|
March 7th, 2006 | #101 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does anyone know any structural engineers or demolitions experts that would view the questions raised by facts in the videos?
|
March 7th, 2006 | #102 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,392
|
Abraham Lincoln
You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time."
|
March 7th, 2006 | #103 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #104 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
This loose change video is public domain. i have a copy in my possession. no copyright restrictions at all. Can we upload this to the VNN multimedia screening room?
download it from here http://www.loosechange911.com/ |
March 7th, 2006 | #105 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
|
I think it's time to merge all these 911 threads into one, and name it "The Circle Jerk of the Paranoid Schizophrenic".
How many of you have a degree in engineering? How about physics? How about any of the natural sciences? Raise your hands..........................no, didn't think so. I knew a guy, with a degree in physics, who didn't believe the controlled demo bullshit. Matter of fact, this guy held a PhD in physics. |
March 7th, 2006 | #106 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Anyhow they got 2 phds in physics talking on those videos, are those guys paranoiacs too? I understand the debunking mentality-- but you need to sit down and look at this shit. It does make a big difference between the official story that the Arabs knocked em down and the Israelis were like following them around or something-- vs, neoconservative elements within the government blew these buildings up and murdered thousands of people. That is qualitatively different and if it's plausible-- just PLAUSIBLE-- not provable, considering, they toted all the evidence off to be melted down for scrap in China-- if it is just PLAUSIBLE to a person of reasonable education and judgment-- then it's a major big fucking deal. How not so? Dont just debunk this stuff-- watch them both like I did and come back and tell us what is wrong with what they're saying exactly, in these two movies identified in this thread. |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #107 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #108 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Here's the thing I cant get over. The one vid shows over and again the footage of a building being demolished-- and that building by the way, looks like one of the old Robert Taylor Home projects from Chicago Illinois-- justaposed with the collapse of WTC 7.
Same fucking thing. So what happened? Some debris hit the side of the WTC 7 building. There were some fires inside. And then, it suddenly fucking collapsed like it was dynamited, and lo and behold, everybody running around on the ground AT THE TIME-- CONTEMPERANEOUS SENSE IMPRESSION-- LAWYERS WILL KNOW THAT AS "RES GESTAE" EVIDENCE-- is that there were these big boom explosions-- and then wow, the fucking things went down in 10 second freefalls. Gee, I didnt know a wastebasket fire could do that eh? |
March 7th, 2006 | #109 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
But-- you admit that you have not watched either movie, isnt that right? |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #110 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #111 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
One of my friends said to me today, geez it's like the Zapruder movie-- you see his head go snapping backwards, but they say he got hit from behind, that's why his head snapped backwords, and they have a bullshit explanation that people take seriously for a decade before the actually RECONVENE a Senate Select Subcommitte to re-investigate exactly what the fuckall happened. And lo, some compelling evidence is found that there were two shooters on on the grassy knoll.
Were those people on that later committee that came up with different conclusions than the first official investigation, were they paranoiacs or conspiracy theorists? |
March 7th, 2006 | #112 | |
Nuthin' But Luv, Baby
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,280
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #113 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
I dont know what happened, but it looks to me like those building were blown up. Demolished, is the word for it. I know what it looks like when a building gets demolished-- it looks like that. I know what it looks like when a high-rise building catches on fire and burns for a while because, it has happend several times around the world, and they are always left with the central beams or whatever sticking up even if the floors collapse-- and there have been longer hotter fires than this where the goddamned floors didnt even collapse let alone all pancake at once, presto, ten seconds! The government story is LESS plausible than the demolition story. The only difference is MASS HYSTERIA groupthink that prevents people who DO have PHDs from sticking necks out so they can a) get fired from their jobs, b) lose chance for that tenured position, c) get mocked by their Jewish colleages, d) have their ex-wives try to use this against them in custody battles, or e) all of the above! |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #114 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
Well, my friend was pretty scared about the whole thing-- but he wasnt an eyewitness. Can you share with us exactly what street you were on that gave you a visual vantage point? At what time did you visually see any of this and exactly what part? Come on man, don't fade on us now! You lay the claim-- maybe so! I just want to know your perspective, can you describe it to us? |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #115 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,302
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #116 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
|
|
March 7th, 2006 | #117 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
I'm not going to call you names, I didnt believe this stuff yesterday before I watched it either. For years I have heard one silly-assed bullshit story after another out of the socalled patriot community, ufos and all the rest of it, and wasnt eager to swallow another whopper. This is not the same thing. |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #118 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
http://911revisited.infad.net/video.html
WTC towers 1 & 2 had 47 solid steel central columns each. The core was not hollow as stated in the official account. Why werent these columns left standing? MIT Engineering Professor Jeff King talks about this. Another expert raises questions. This one, most troubled about the dust cloud-- whence the pulverized concrete? |
March 7th, 2006 | #119 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
|
Quote:
What an idiot! |
|
March 7th, 2006 | #120 | |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
Quote:
I have more than 5,000 hours (much more, actually) flying full cockpit flight simulators. I worked for two different companies designing, and building f15, f16, f18, and foreign fighter simulators. I also helped design and build a Space Shuttle simulator for Lockheed Aerospace in the 1970s. Some expertise, not a lot. The only thing I can state backed with some actual certitude is that it is completely impossible for anyone with only simulator training to fly a vastly more complicated airplane than that in which they have simulator training. In fact, it is laughable to even suggest it. Enkidu
__________________
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon" |
|
Tags |
#1, 911, c4l, gov, jew bs, jew vs jew, jews did 9-11, wtc |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|