Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > Uncensored Europe + > United Kingdom
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old April 16th, 2021 #81
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

How does one even be a survivalist in Britain? Learn how to avoid double decker buses, and avoid sharia controlled zones?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #82
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
How does one even be a survivalist in Britain? Learn how to avoid double decker buses, and avoid sharia controlled zones?
Survivalist (secondary definition): A person who tries to ensure their own survival or that of their social or national group

I have gathered information relating to survivng in the event of civilisational collapse. I have organised the information and stored it on a document. Not doing this is imprudent and makes you weak. Prey.

I do not like your attitude.
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #83
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
Survivalist (secondary definition): A person who tries to ensure their own survival or that of their social or national group

I have gathered information relating to survivng in the event of civilisational collapse. I have organised the information and stored it on a document. Not doing this is imprudent and makes you weak. Prey.
Why do you got such a fixation on British ethnic and national survival when you're admittedly not part of that group?

Quote:
I do not like your attitude.
Sue me Britfag wannabe.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #84
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Why do you got such a fixation on British ethnic and national survival when you're admittedly not part of that group?
I am mostly British though. Mostly English, specifically. I look very nearly entirely like one of them.

I am only concerned with the ethnic survival. The racial material being 100% present in someone is what makes them British, not any civilisational label. Also, the United Kingdom is a very faulty, weak, ridiculous and malignant civilisation that has many qualities that I hate and/or find embarrassing. It is also doomed.


To answer your question, my reasoning behind advocating British racial preservation is as follows:

1) The British have utility to the creation of a society that has maximum protection against belligerent, threatening and subversive activities and influences, meaning it is essential for achieving societal / civilisational invulnerability
(As a general rule, having specific uniform racial distinctiveness and total racial homogeneity in a society’s population makes it easier to detect outside elements and thwart enemies - YOU CANNOT INFILTRATE A GROUP CONTAINING A HIGH PROPORTION OF MEMBERS WHO HAVE AWARENESS OF THE UNIQUE CHARACTERISTIC(S) OF THE GROUP IF YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF HIGHLY RESEMBLING ITS MEMBERS)
(Britons are concentrated on several islands, and island-based civilisations, in general, are more difficult for enemy forces / elements to reach, assault and/or conquer, as history has demonstrated on numerous occasions - Force multiplier)
(Specific racial homogeneity is ESSENTIAL for very highly effective societal and civilisational protection, and anyone who says otherwise is an ignoramus and/or a liar)
(The British geographical prevalence and protection levels greatly exceed those of the Scandinavians, and Scandinavia borders Russia too, which is seriously threatening)
2) The British have utility to the continuity of high-level general aesthetic desirability, a very fun and irreplaceable quality, as well as a crucial defensive component that is protected primarily through preservation of people of specific European racial types, which are British (with the English variant and its features bestowing beauty at the greatest potency and prevalence), Scandinavian and British-Scandinavian mixture
3) The British have utility to saving people from being born racially non-optimal or racially non-British, saving them from all the associated detrimental and disadvantaging effects (e.g. racial separatism ineligibility, lack of transplant compatibility, aesthetic inferiority of minor / non-minor severity) (denying people the aforementioned qualities for no valid reason, with sufficient awareness of how destructive and dooming the racial deprivation is, is evil and sick)
4) For at least the majority of people (myself included), British words and names are far easier to spell and pronounce, unlike the words and names of the British race’s only major desirability rival, the Scandinavian camp, so there is no higher level of frustration or time consumption here
5) It is very reasonable to speculate that the British race and its biological material have at least a strong prevalence / numerical advantage over the Scandinavian one, so this makes British racial preservation efforts more feasible, and it makes focus on the British race more practical
6) The United Kingdom is a civilisation equipped with nuclear weapons, so it is in the interests of morally upstanding people everywhere that the British racial demographic is not replaced with demographics that will massively enable the installation of a regime (e.g. an Islamic regime) that will use the nuclear weapons for nefarious purposes

This is where the logical reasons and the reasons not related to my personal feelings end, so I do not use the following reasons in arguments...

7) I like looking at the race's superiority and distinctiveness, and looking at the females is especially enjoyable, what with the nicely structured facial features and very endearing faces of innocence a significant amount of the females have (the English variant provides the enjoyment at the greatest potency)
8) I have significant emotional attachment to the race (this emotional attachment was earned, not automatically given)
9) The race is a significant source of nostalgic pleasure for me
10) With all the conditions of life the racial type’s biological material has bestowed upon me (e.g. very desirable current aesthetic state, capacity for aesthetic excellence, providing females who are fun to look at, giving a nostalgia source), I would be a monstrous ingrate if I were not to support and dote on the race
11) All racial biology that is not Northern / Northwestern European disgusts me to some significant extent (this is nothing personal, it is just my natural reaction to it, just like how my natural reaction is to male-on-male sexual interaction)
12) I see myself as an agent of human quality continuity and advancement, so as someone who views the British race, the English variation of it especially, as exceptionally important and desirable, I am naturally going to vehemently advocate its continuity


Superiority, nostalgia and defensive utility make for a delicious cocktail. In the modern era, the British / English are VERY criminally underrated in the desirability department, with the racial types being horrendously deprived of the positive recognition they deserve.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Sue me Britfag wannabe.
And what is your master race, oh enlightened one? I see the American demographic is so much better off these days for disregarding British racial demography (heavy sarcasm).

I, someone with racial and aesthetic perfectionism deeply ingraned into their mindset, want to be a member of a racial camp with a well-established desirability record, with a strong precedent having been set, with the race being at the top of unofficial ethnic hierarchies (e.g. in the United States), a racial group which I was supposed to have been born into anyway?! I know, that is just crazy! How irrational of me.

Do you like my cultural and demographic warfare engagement manual?

Last edited by John Trent; April 16th, 2021 at 05:07 PM.
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #85
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
And what is your master race, oh enlightened one? I see the American demographic is so much better off these days for disregarding British racial demography (heavy sarcasm).
Most American Whites got Germanic and Celtic genes, and what makes that so much different than the average British White-skin?

Culturally, America and Britain are both pretty jewed. One of your royals came over here to marry one of our niggers, which really says a lot. I'd say that makes one of our niggers worth about as much as one of your royals.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #86
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Most American Whites got Germanic and Celtic genes, and what makes that so much different than the average British White-skin?
The British are racially distinct from the Germans and the Irish. Look at the racial distinctiveness of the British, Irish and Germanic peoples, and you will hopefully see what I mean. I am shocked that you are still oblivious to this, after everything I have said. Denying the distinctive differences is a monumental exercise in futility. The British race is generally and inherently aesthetically superior to the Irish and Germanic camps, with a logical and very compelling precedent to back it up. The British are not even in the same European racial area as the Germanic peoples. The British are Northwestern, and the Germans are Western. The English variation of the British race is greatly generally aesthetically superior to the Germanic one.

The integration of the non-British racial material, save for one specific type of it, has caused very severe general aesthetic damage to the American population. The damage is VERY conspicuous to me. Another cautionary tale of what happens when people turn their backs on the British race. There are several of such tales.

The aware observers know I am not lying about the precedent or the racial distinctiveness, and they know that I am correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Culturally, America and Britain are both pretty jewed. One of your royals came over here to marry one of our niggers, which really says a lot.
Prince Harry is not British anyway. Nearly all of the royals are mixed. Harry is not one of "our" royals. Talking in collectivist terms such as those makes you sound like a communist.

What is the point in even arguing with me? You will lose.

Last edited by John Trent; April 16th, 2021 at 05:06 PM.
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #87
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
The British are racially distinct from the Germans and the Irish. Look at the racial distinctiveness of the British, Irish and Germanic peoples, and you will hopefully see what I mean. I am shocked that you are still oblivious to this, after everything I have said. Denying the distinctive differences is a monumental exercise in futility. The British race is generally and inherently aesthetically superior to the Irish and Germanic camps, with a logical and very compelling precedent to back it up. The British are not even in the same European racial area as the Germanic peoples. The British are Northwestern, and the Germans are Western. The English variation of the British race is greatly generally aesthetically superior to the Germanic one.

The integration of the non-British racial material, save for one specific type of it, has caused very severe general aesthetic damage to the American population. The damage is VERY conspicuous to me. Another cautionary tale of what happens when people turn their backs on the British race. There are several of such tales.

The aware observers know I am not lying about the precedent or the racial distinctiveness, and they know that I am correct.
Post some example photos of what you define as the epitome of british racial specimens, no homo.

Quote:
Prince Harry is not British anyway. Nearly all of the royals are mixed. Harry is not one of "our" royals. Talking in collectivist terms such as those makes you sound like a communist.

What is the point in even arguing with me? You will lose.
Brits are just as deserving of their oil drilling "royal", along with their nigger "prince" and "duchess" as Americans are deserving of a nigger "president", in my opinion.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #88
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
Default

The terms British and American are not racial classifications and never have been. Griffin's BNP was obliterated in the courts trying to prove otherwise and quickly dissapeared in humiliating fashion. Any cakewalking coon or cow loving wog can become British or American just by obtaining a document. Unfortunately the current parliament and US vice president are living proof of this fact.

Anyone who claims the *Brittish" are a race is either a moron or a troll. Why give life to this fraud, John Trent? It's a mystery to me.
 
Old April 16th, 2021 #89
Paul Anthony
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Austria
Posts: 2,205
Default

I've said before 'Brother John Trent' is either serverly mentally ill, autistic, or one of the greatest comedians I've ever come across.. And I'm still not sure?!?
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #90
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry. View Post
The terms British and American are not racial classifications and never have been. Griffin's BNP was obliterated in the courts trying to prove otherwise and quickly dissapeared in humiliating fashion. Any cakewalking coon or cow loving wog can become British or American just by obtaining a document. Unfortunately the current parliament and US vice president are living proof of this fact.

Anyone who claims the *Brittish" are a race is either a moron or a troll. Why give life to this fraud, John Trent? It's a mystery to me.
Are you seriously denying the existence of racial distinctiveness among the relevant racial inhabitants of the British Isles? Are you seriously that delusional? All those with a sufficient level of racial awareness are laughng at you. Clearly, you are the one who is either a moron or a troll.

Griffin was incompetent. During his Question Time appearance, he used the term 'skin colour'. His list of mistakes is huge.

I have been around the British all my life, unlike you, who has almost certainly never been around any of them, or seen them in any significant frequency! I know what they look like! I will not have some arrogant foreigner telling me I am wrong!

When the Hell did I ever say 'American' is a racial classification?
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #91
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Post some example photos of what you define as the epitome of british racial specimens, no homo.
I will not waste my time with the attachment feature, because it is fiddly and annoying, but I will post the details of the precedent that has been set.


When one examines various activities and factors of the past and the present, they will see there is a clear historical precedent and consensus on which people are the most aesthetically appealing overall. The vigorous beauty assertion this site makes has very great validity, and railing against it is just ridiculous and, in practice, will lead to people being senselessly condemned to inferior appearance. Offenders are either very confused, very ignorant, anti-Britons, anti-Europeans, mental slaves who have become attached to another racial type through base mental processing (e.g. tribalistic impulses, nationalistic reasons) (this renders them biased), emotionally immature common-grade fools, or they may be some mixture of the categories.

To start with, several Western entities have doted on the continuity of Britons (some people like to crudely and incorrectly refer to them as WASPs or 'Anglos'), with notably disproportionately higher English variant focus. Efforts were made to repel other European racial types (Germanic, Mediterranean, Slavic, etc). An example being the stances of early racialist elements in the United States, clearly perceiving the British race as a highly desirable quality to be continued. Among the general population, there was clearly very widespread subconscious recognition of the greater racial desirability of the "WASPs". It is true that there were other factors involved (e.g. Protestant-Catholic tensions, fear of the Communist Bloc), but the doting there has been consistent. This can be reasonably interpreted as part of a consensus.

Scandinavians have very high approval ratings regarding aesthetics. The fact that so many people who lack advanced racial awareness and have not carried out extensive observation have managed to notice the heightened levels of overall aesthetic desirability is very telling. This can also be reasonably interpreted as part of a consensus.

If one with adequate racial awareness examines physical beauty-centred content produced by certain Western organisations (e.g. the more explicit "entertainment" magazines / studios) before the era of ultra-sensitivity, heavy leftist influence and political correctness, they will notice how nearly all of the people exhibited are of Northern / Northwestern European appearance or heavy resemblance, with non-Europeans pretty much nowhere to be found. Even in non-physical beauty-centred Western media, many of the people, male and female, who are featured, many of whom are intended to be seen as physically attractive, are very physically attractive, with heavy Northern / Northwestern resemblance, at the very least. In these types of media, serious emphasis is made on the aesthetic desirability of the relevant characters. Prominent examples of these media types include but are FAR from being limited to the older animated Disney productions (films and television), many teenage / adult female audience-aimed films (this is most commonly seen in the ones that have 'mean girl' antagonists and/or teenage girls who exhibit vivacious / endearing qualities), television programmes (Home and Away used to be a very good example of British / N/NW racial desirability being exhibited with high frequency, as were the old American "high school" / teen dramas), comic books (e.g. DC Comics characters such as Harley Quinn) and many of the older American films (especially the ones in the horror genre, which feature cliques or groups of high-spirited teenagers, who usually end up being victims). Even in the modern era, N/NWs and heavily N/NW-resembling people are still rather prevalent in the beauty-related media spotlight. This is another aspect that can be reasonably interpreted as part of a consensus.

Another important point is that, in the area of inherent desirability, English demographics have never been seriously attacked (apart from the invalid 'bad teeth' stereotype asserted by some stupid, jealous, resentful and/or persistent Americans) or persecuted throughout history, and neither have Scandinavian ones. This is not to say that any persecution is morally acceptable, but still, it does indicate demographic presence preferences. It is fair to assume many of the persecutors noticed the different appearances of the racially different people and disapproved of what they saw, seeing such demographic spread as threatening.

It is very interesting how very frequently Northern / Northwestern and/or N/NW-resembling people feature in regular media with at least some aesthetic desirability relevance. The nature of many of the characters in Japanese cartoons and other media animation (the video game area is the most prominent example) is also very much worth highlighting. Nearly all the characters are of Northern / Northwestern European appearance or heavy resemblance. Why would characters with this racial appearance be so very disproportionately included if there were no sort of very intense general admiration? There is a very intense overrepresentation of heavily N/NW-resembling female characters with various girl-focused fashion toys and accessories (e.g. Barbie before producers started to yield to the anti-European brigade), with very strong emphasis placed on the physical beauty of the characters. Furthermore, it is very obvious the primary reason for there being such a heightened prevalence of good-looking people in countries like the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand is because of high prevalence of the Northern / Northwestern European racial material (those countries now have either considerably lower or drastically lower proportions of aesthetically pleasing people comprised within them now, primarily due to the prevalence of non-British racial material). This aspect becomes obvious through examining the facial features, as the pleasant ones are disproportionately N/NW or at the very least, N/NW-resembling. Another interesting aspect is the significant amount of partially non-N/NW females who are Europeans, who apply makeup to themselves to mimic N/NW appearance as closely as possible (nearly all of them do this unknowingly).

The findings are overwhelmingly conclusive. The volume of general aesthetic desirability is much noticeably higher in Northern (no notable difference among Scandinavian nationalities) and Northwestern European (Britons more heavily so than Irish, with the English being the most generally aesthetically pleasing Northwesterners overall) and N/NW extraction demographics. Britons, Scandinavians, those who are mixed with the two racial types and those with heavy N/NW resemblance were compared to other European types several times, with differing samples and significantly large sample sizes. There is definitely strong correlation.

Opponents are technically correct about physical beauty being subjective, but this does not matter when there have been such consistent patterns of doting and distinction. The logical course is obvious. Basically, the evidence and patterns very greatly consist with the assertion of Britons (especially the English variant), Scandinavians and British-Scandinavian mixture people being the most desirable in the beauty department overall. It is most logical to use these racial groups as points of reference for beauty amplification efforts. There are clear and logical paths to follow to achieve optimal results regarding aesthetics and other aspects.
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #92
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

A large chunk (NOT ALL) of American users of this site should return to the sewers whence they came! Their stupid and pathetic inputs are worthless and unwanted. Mentally and culturally outclassed simpletons. Arrogant degenerates and ignoramuses!

Due to the disregarding of British racial demography, combined with the integration of all types of European racial biology, the term 'Ugly American' has now become literal as well as figurative, in the vast majority of cases.

Last edited by John Trent; April 17th, 2021 at 02:57 AM.
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #93
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Anthony View Post
I've said before 'Brother John Trent' is either serverly mentally ill, autistic, or one of the greatest comedians I've ever come across.. And I'm still not sure?!?
"Autistic comedian with severe mental illness....not funny" will suffice. One never knows when a crank like this will give in to its perversions, so, in order to protect the "British racial demographic" from his, it needs to be placed in a secure facility such as Broadmoor. Until then he should be banned.

Where does he stand on the moon landings....
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #94
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
I will not waste my time with the attachment feature, because it is fiddly and annoying, but I will post the details of the precedent that has been set.
What kind of illiterate prole are you, if you can't figure out how to post an image on an internet forums?

Or, maybe this applies:

__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #95
John Trent
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The grievously decadent and mental inadequacy-infested cesspit known as Britain
Posts: 1,240
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
What kind of illiterate prole are you, if you can't figure out how to post an image on an internet forums?
In the past, I had problems getting the images to appear with the proper dimensions. So now, I just cannot be bothered. Deal with it.

I am not wasting any more time on you, or that revolting maggot with a profile picture of a man who is very clearly racially foreign. This thread has moved too far off-topic.

Denying British racial distinctiveness. Oh, that cracks me up greatly.
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #96
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
Default

It's like Griffin and Jack Sen had a love child and named it John Trent.
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #97
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

John Trent, what % coolie are you? Half? Quarter? Eighth? Sixteenth? Are you lighter or darker than Jack Sen?
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #98
Henry.
Senior Member
 
Henry.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
I am not wasting any more time on you, or that revolting maggot with a profile picture of a man who is very clearly racially foreign. This thread has moved too far off-topic.

Denying British racial distinctiveness. Oh, that cracks me up greatly.
That's Mr. Maggot to you. So in your expert view you don't think the man in the avatar is part of the "British racial demographic" as you so comically put it?
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #99
Paul Anthony
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Austria
Posts: 2,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Trent View Post
In the past, I had problems getting the images to appear with the proper dimensions.
AUTISM!!!

Worry not 'Brother John' I'm here to help!!

https://picresize.com/
 
Old April 17th, 2021 #100
Paul Anthony
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Austria
Posts: 2,205
Smile

'Brother John' can you please post us some pics of English girls you find sexy and atheticly pleasing?!
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 AM.
Page generated in 0.33108 seconds.