Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 5th, 2016 #1
NewsFeed
News Bot
 
Post Withdraw women's right to vote

Let me be clear here. When I refer to women's right to vote I mean voting on affairs of state, not on The X Factor or Big Brother, contests for which they're eminently suited. But my suggestion is probably futile anyway because that particular boat has long sailed and won't be returning to port any time soon. Our best hope is that it founders on the rocky shoals of reality with all aboard perishing in a watery grave.

Why the animus? Because it's clear that everything which besets and torments us today can be traced back to the entry of women to politics, with their strings expertly pulled by Cultural Marxist nation-wreckers such as those of the Frankfurt School. Their success can be judged by the pitiful state of the White male today. Discriminated against at every turn, the butt of every joke in the media, walking on eggshells lest an innocuous comment offends some protected group, edged out of jobs, college places and promotions, while the Government seizes at least half of his income which then ends up with the very groups who dispossess him.

Should he succeed, against the odds, in getting into a good university he'll discover to his horror that they're no longer elite intellectual forums. No, he'll find that they're virtual daycare centres for delicate snowflakes protected from upsetting contrarian opinion, Cultural Marxist brainwashing laboratories, with academic courses dumbed-down to accommodate minorities admitted under AA quotas. (Sociology degrees. Here, take one). Should he decide to start a business he'll find himself swamped with equal employment, health and safety, environmental and legal requirements and a government bureaucracy which works at every hands turn to frustrate him and drain away his earnings. And woe betide him should he marry, his house and children forfeit should his wife decide to up and leave.

And there are deeper economic and social implications. The bogus 'fairness' and 'equality' doctrines have created a huge and growing welfare class, one where the state replaces the traditional roles of fathers and husband roles by enthusiastically catering for baby mamas' bastard spawn. The replacement of merit by (bogus) fairness has had catastrophic impact on standards everywhere as women and other suffering minorities get shoehorned into positions beyond their capabilities. Say goodbye to bridges that don't collapse and the economic wonders that women and other minorities take for granted. And women succumb to the worst forms of xenophilia, leading the welcome for the swarthy hordes of invaders currently swarming across our borders. (Female support is massively under-represented - by orders of magnitude - for Europe's "far-right" (ha!) parties and similarly over-represented for kumbaya parties like the Greens).

It's no surprise that women vote disproportionately for such liberal, left-wing and kumbaya-style policies and the politicians that espouse them. (Obama would not have been elected had voting been confi

----- snip -----


read full article at source: http://irishsavant.blogspot.de/2016/...t-to-vote.html
 
Old February 5th, 2016 #2
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Look at the most popular entertainments for women: the perpetually, inexplicably fascinating (for females, anyway) Kardashian-Jenner mudshark whore/tranny circus and other "reality" filth; lousy sheebs like Lena Dunham & Amy Schumer; Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry & Beyonce on the "musical" front. Then consider their favorite popular art: Thomas Kincaid, P. Buckley Moss - cutesy, purely decorative stuff.

Yes. Giving them the vote was the greatest political blunder that ever benefited the kike in White history - and the worst thing that ever happened to the White race. I'd take it away from them if I could in a heartbeat - along with the right of Christers like the shitheads who gave "REAL Christian!" Cruz Iowa after he lied to them about Uncle Ben dropping out. Sadly, that katz is out of the bag for good, so we've got to do everything we can to work around it.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old February 5th, 2016 #3
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
Look at the most popular entertainments for women: the perpetually, inexplicably fascinating (for females, anyway) Kardashian-Jenner mudshark whore/tranny circus and other "reality" filth; lousy sheebs like Lena Dunham & Amy Schumer; Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus, Katy Perry & Beyonce on the "musical" front. Then consider their favorite popular art: Thomas Kincaid, P. Buckley Moss - cutesy, purely decorative stuff.

Yes. Giving them the vote was the greatest political blunder that ever benefited the kike in White history - and the worst thing that ever happened to the White race. I'd take it away from them if I could in a heartbeat - along with the right of Christers like the shitheads who gave "REAL Christian!" Cruz Iowa after he lied to them about Uncle Ben dropping out. Sadly, that katz is out of the bag for good, so we've got to do everything we can to work around it.
I agree. They're obsessed with the likes of sluts like Paris Hilton, Kim Kardashian and American Idol, and they always vote liberal and Hillary will be elected if she gets the nomination because women will vote for her combined with the voting fraud as well. I say 80 percent of women will vote for Hillary maybe more.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #4
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

Ironically several studies suggest that a lot of women don't take any interest in politics and simply vote for the same candidate as their husbands or parents.

Why don't we just ban voting altogether; it's not like it makes any difference and it would save A) a section of society from rigging it and B) another section of society from trying to pretend A) didn't happen.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #5
John from Canada
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,158
Default

Only white men who own property should vote.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #6
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
Only white men who own property should vote.
Mere property ownership shouldn't be a factor; Bill Gates is both "white" and has a Mt. Everest of property. Ideally, I'd limit the franchise to White men with IQs of at least 95, between the ages of 25 & 75: weed out the retards, the know-it-all, know-nothing-at-all punks & the senile. Require a test on civics & general knowledge of world affairs. In short: create an electorate WORTHY to decide the nation's affairs.

Of course, that's just pie-in-the-sky. But if we can rip the god damned kike's hairy paws off the controls of the mass brainwashing machinery, we could herd the women & the shitheads back onto the path of racial survival quite easily.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #7
White Brazilian Boy
Senior Member
 
White Brazilian Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Posts: 823
White Brazilian Boy
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
Only white men who own property should vote.
And the person should have basic knowledge of Geography and History.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #8
keifer
Senior Member
 
keifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
keifer
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
Only white men who own property should vote.
When your property is faced with threat by invasion, are you gonna expect non property owners to help you defend your property and voting rights.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #9
Darkvictory
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 190
Darkvictory
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Ironically several studies suggest that a lot of women don't take any interest in politics and simply vote for the same candidate as their husbands or parents.

Why don't we just ban voting altogether; it's not like it makes any difference and it would save A) a section of society from rigging it and B) another section of society from trying to pretend A) didn't happen.
You have a point.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #10
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Ironically several studies suggest that a lot of women don't take any interest in politics and simply vote for the same candidate as their husbands or parents.

Why don't we just ban voting altogether; it's not like it makes any difference and it would save A) a section of society from rigging it and B) another section of society from trying to pretend A) didn't happen.
Can't be that true because the polls show women voting a lot more democrat than men do.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #11
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffreyWaffenSS View Post
Can't be that true because the polls show women voting a lot more democrat than men do.
According to some woman named Terry O'Neill from the National Organisation for women, the discrepancy/lead of women who voted Obama in 2012 were unmarried (ie with no significant male in their lives) heads of families and reacting to Romney's comments on issues that affected them such as after school care, planned parenthood (especially when you have candidates in Indiana telling them that post rape pregnancy is the will of god) and so on.

I find the studies credible because the female lead in the comparison between male and female is not that great. It would be interesting to find out if the proportion of families with a woman at the head is similar to the discrepancy in male/female votes.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #12
John from Canada
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bev View Post
Ironically several studies suggest that a lot of women don't take any interest in politics and simply vote for the same candidate as their husbands or parents.

Why don't we just ban voting altogether; it's not like it makes any difference and it would save A) a section of society from rigging it and B) another section of society from trying to pretend A) didn't happen.

Canadian women were given the vote in exchange for supporting the war against Germany.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #13
Bev
drinking tea
 
Bev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: England
Posts: 38,247
Bev
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John from Canada View Post
Canadian women were given the vote in exchange for supporting the war against Germany.
Yes, women in the armed forces, nurses dealing with the fallout and women who had husbands/sons fighting were given the vote in 1916, if I remember correctly. All women without the influence of men in their lives, I believe - at least, that's if the rules were the same as ours meaning nurses had to be unmarried. So it doesn't rule out the thought that women vote the same as their significant male figure.
__________________
Above post is my opinion unless it's a quote.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #14
Vaughn
Junior Member
 
Vaughn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 122
Vaughn
Default

Women are herd animals totally incapable of exhibiting independent thought. They are also poor decision makers. Just look at all the single mothers lugging around their womb turds in public after Chad knocked them up and took off. Countless women in their thirties and forties wondering why men won't commit to them after spending their youth drinking booze, pursuing worthless pieces of paper, and jumping from cock to cock. "Feelz before reelz" is the female's standard operating procedure.

Never allow them to vote under any circumstances.
 
Old February 6th, 2016 #15
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vaughn View Post
Women are herd animals totally incapable of exhibiting independent thought. They are also poor decision makers. Just look at all the single mothers lugging around their womb turds in public after Chad knocked them up and took off. Countless women in their thirties and forties wondering why men won't commit to them after spending their youth drinking booze, pursuing worthless pieces of paper, and jumping from cock to cock. "Feelz before reelz" is the female's standard operating procedure.

Never allow them to vote under any circumstances.
Especially a lot of them you see them lugging around literally brown pieces of shit with the soulless look in their eyes. I see that on dating site a lot white women with their hellspawn in their photos. Fucking race traitors.

And now you have shows like Duck Dynasty that promoting having a niglit making it look all hip to have a nigger baby.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #16
Meg Kafka
Senior Member
 
Meg Kafka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lake Tahoe
Posts: 1,184
Meg Kafka
Default

It wasnt Jefferson and Washington that gave them the vote. That should tell you all you need to know.

Obviously, the full fruition of the female vote came to roost when Johnson, Carter, and Klinton--2 of them early metrosexuals---came in and nearly caused financial and political collapse. So I'd include **most modern men in the equation of "females". Whether they have a penis or not, theyre basically chicks with a vote.

The only thing that can return things to 'as nature intended' would be some kind of catastrophe that sends most people back into a survival mode.

In lieu of that not happening, the best men can hope for is to outsmart the whole thing, avoid the libtards, and become part of a community that is left alone somewhere like Wyoming. THey need some really good lawyers. Such as creating a "religious community" or a "tax free" non profit, or whatever. As the world becomes less stable and scary, there would be droves and droves of women trying to get into the compound.

You dont want a target on your chest like those dumb asses in Oregon.

I dont agree with your denominational conclusions here, this had nothing to do with Christianity. If anything, Christianity has been the only force to retain the nuclear family the past 50 years since the socialistas got all the womyn wanting to be "equal" by working 10 hours a day. Evangelical Christians have consistently voted as a block for the ability of the father in the home to be the head of the house, and that he should work while the woman raises the kids. Not only that, but against "TRANS GENDER" bullshit, and against faggotry. But whatever.

Last edited by Meg Kafka; February 7th, 2016 at 01:29 PM.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #17
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meg Kafka View Post
It wasnt Jefferson and Washington that gave them the vote. That should tell you all you need to know.

Obviously, the full fruition of the female vote came to roost when Johnson, Carter, and Klinton--2 of them early metrosexuals---came in and nearly caused financial and political collapse. So I'd include **most modern men in the equation of "females". Whether they have a penis or not, theyre basically chicks with a vote.

The only thing that can return things to 'as nature intended' would be some kind of catastrophe that sends most people back into a survival mode.

In lieu of that not happening, the best men can hope for is to outsmart the whole thing, avoid the libtards, and become part of a community that is left alone somewhere like Wyoming. THey need some really good lawyers. Such as creating a "religious community" or a "tax free" non profit, or whatever. As the world becomes less stable and scary, there would be droves and droves of women trying to get into the compound.

You dont want a target on your chest like those dumb asses in Oregon.

I dont agree with your denominational conclusions here, this had nothing to do with Christianity. If anything, Christianity has been the only force to retain the nuclear family the past 50 years since the socialistas got all the womyn wanting to be "equal" by working 10 hours a day. Evangelical Christians have consistently vote as a block for the ability of the father in the home to be the head of the house, and that he should work while the woman raises the kids. But whatever.
At least Carter is wiser towards Israel and that terror state. Can't say that about patriotard heroes like Reagan and both Bush presidents. Granted Carter wasn't that good of a president but to say he was as bad as Onigger is a big stretch.

Reagan is to blame too for a lot of the economic shit going on and his "trickle down" capitalist bullshit that in reality favors big companies and moving their plants overseas claiming the money will "trickle down" to the average joe.
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #18
N.B. Forrest
Senior Member
 
N.B. Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, CSA
Posts: 11,145
N.B. Forrest
Default

Quote:
Meanwhile in the US, support for the current Republican frontrunner Donald Trump is particularly strong among angry, frustrated, white, less-educated men in their 40s.
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....

Quote:
Young, angry white voters may be on the rise – but without the votes of women and older people they will always hit a ceiling.
Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
__________________
"First: Do No Good." - The Hymiecratic Oath

"The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life." - John Wesley Hardin
 
Old February 7th, 2016 #19
JeffreyWaffenSS
Senior Member
 
JeffreyWaffenSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,513
JeffreyWaffenSS
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....



Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
I agree. Especially younger women under 50 are very self centered, really don't give a shit except for themselves, unless there is a rich guy then they care about his money. That's why you see a lot of nigger and spic ball players with white girlfriends and wives because they want his money and be famous.

To be honest though I almost want Bernie Sanders to be president and if somehow he gets a democrat congress to try and pass his spending shit and all the whites and everyone gets hand outs and eventually the system crashes and a revolution. That is the only way this country is going to change is something radical to happen.

As long as the white man has his porn, internet, TV, and cheap American beer he's happy.
 
Old February 8th, 2016 #20
Meg Kafka
Senior Member
 
Meg Kafka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Lake Tahoe
Posts: 1,184
Meg Kafka
Default

Yeah, thats a familiar smarmy rant. The Tea Party emergence was always attributed to "white racist rednecks". Never mind that if you examined the demographics of the Tea party, they were probably in the top 5 percent of education, income, and charity contributions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by N.B. Forrest View Post
The commie Guardian oozes condescension & contempt when talking about this demographic - uniquely: the demands of perpetually pissed, city-destroying niggers are 100% legit & Must Be Addressed; those of Whites are just the whinings of "less-educated" losers who used to be on top and don't like getting a taste of their own medicine....



Women & the old are both easily frightened by jew-skewing & as self-centered as fuck. As for the Young Angry Whites & that allegedly perpetual "ceiling" the Guardian-type fags think will protect them & their genocidal agenda: today's deadwood aged are keeling over every day, to be replaced by the more politically astute who can see that their complacency allowed the jews to run roughshod & destroy the basics of our survival.

In short: you'll get yours, bastards.
 
Reply

Tags
women tools

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:12 PM.
Page generated in 0.14253 seconds.