|
August 26th, 2010 | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NY, nigger and fag capitol of the east!!
Posts: 93
|
Hey Tom, very insightful comment! I bet you think all negroes are like Denzel Washington and Will Smith, always doing the right thing and saving stupid whites from various disasters!! Pull your head out of your ass and quit saying stupid things!!! Did you bother to read the 40 or so posts before you made your retarded statement??? I doubt it!!! Go watch Seinfield episodes to from your opinion of jews!!!! Idiots like you are the reason whites are in so much trouble!!!@#@##@#@!!!!!
|
August 28th, 2010 | #62 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
|
|
August 28th, 2010 | #63 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: FUCK YOU!
Posts: 1,477
|
Quote:
Gman, go see "Kinsey Syndrome" on Jewtube and you'll see the real story behind porn. I don't want anything to do with it as a White man. Heil Hitler! 14/88! |
|
February 26th, 2011 | #64 |
Your Pro-White Neighbor...
|
More jewish Pornographers...
Micheal Whiteacre, jewish pornographer, and proud of it.:
Websites: http://www.youtube.com/michaelwhiteacre http://www.myspace.com/mwhiteacre FB:http://www.facebook.com/whiteacre |
April 2nd, 2011 | #65 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
John Schlesinger
Born John Richard Schlesinger 16 February 1926(1926-02-16) London, England, U.K. Died 25 July 2003(2003-07-25) (aged 77) Palm Springs, California, U.S. John Richard Schlesinger, CBE (16 February 1926 – 25 July 2003) was an English film and stage director and actor. Early life Schlesinger was born in London into a middle-class Jewish family,[1] the son of Winifred Henrietta (née Regensburg) and Bernard Edward Schlesinger, a physician.[2] After Uppingham School and Balliol College, Oxford, he worked as an actor. Career Schlesinger's acting career began in the 1950s and consisted of supporting roles in British films such as The Divided Heart and Oh... Rosalinda!!, and British television productions such as BBC Sunday Night Theatre and The Vise. He began his directorial career in 1956 with the documentary short Sunday in the Park about London's Hyde Park. By the 1960s, he had virtually given up acting to concentrate on a directing career, and another of his earlier directorial efforts, the British Transport Films' documentary Terminus (1961), gained a Venice Film Festival Gold Lion and a British Academy Award. His first two fiction movies, A Kind of Loving (1962) and Billy Liar (1963) were set in the North of England. A Kind of Loving won the Golden Bear award at the 12th Berlin International Film Festival in 1962.[3] His third, Darling (1965), tartly described the modern urban way of life in London and was one of the first films about 'swinging London'. Schlesinger's next film was the period drama Far From the Madding Crowd (1967), an adaptation of Thomas Hardy's popular novel. Both films featured Julie Christie as the female lead. Schlesinger's next film, Midnight Cowboy (1969), filmed in the United States, was internationally acclaimed. A story of two hustlers living on the fringe in the bad side of New York City, it was Schlesinger's first movie shot in the U.S., and it won Oscars for Best Director and Best Picture. During the 1970s, he made an array of movies about loners, losers, and people outside the clean world. Later, after Honky Tonk Freeway (1981), he worked on films that attracted mixed responses from the public, and few dollars. In Britain, he did better with films like Madame Sousatzka (1988) and Cold Comfort Farm (1995). His later films include Sunday Bloody Sunday (1971), The Day of the Locust (1975), Marathon Man (1976), Yanks (1979), The Falcon and the Snowman (1985), Pacific Heights (1990), the TV play A Question of Attribution (1991), The Innocent (1993) and The Next Best Thing (2000). Schlesinger also directed Timon of Athens (1965) for the Royal Shakespeare Company and the musical I and Albert (1972) at London's Piccadilly Theatre. From 1973 he was an associate director of the Royal National Theatre. Openly gay himself, Schlesinger dealt with homosexuality in Darling, Midnight Cowboy, Sunday Bloody Sunday, and The Next Best Thing, and two of the main characters in Marathon Man are implicitly gay[citation needed]. Speaking about the unflattering portrayal of homosexuality in Midnight Cowboy, he stated that he was against political correctness and the self-censorship it encourages, which would prevent such a film from being made today.[citation needed] In 1991, Schlesinger made a rare return to acting by appearing in a cameo role in the BBC made-for-television film The Lost Language of Cranes, in which he played a gay character. Schlesinger also directed a notable party political broadcast for the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom general election of 1992 which featured Prime Minister John Major returning to Brixton in south London, where he had spent his teenage years, which highlighted his humble background, atypical for a Conservative politician. Schlesinger admitted to having voted for all three main political parties in the UK at one time or another. The book and TV series The Glittering Prizes, written by Frederic Raphael, who won the Best Screenwriting Oscar for his work on Schlesinger's film Darling, feature a character believed to be based on Schlesinger.[citation needed] Sexuality In his Diaries – 2003, Alan Bennett describes Schlesinger as "wonderfully funny, particularly about his sex life" and that, despite being "short, solid and fat", Schlesinger was "surprisingly successful in finding partners". Not invariably though. Sometime in the 1970s he was in New York bath house where the practice was for someone wanting a partner to leave the cubicle door open. This Schlesinger accordingly did and lay monumentally on the table under his towel waiting for someone to pass by. A youth duly did and indeed ventured in, but seeing this mound of flesh laid out on the slab recoiled, saying "Oh, please. I couldn't. You've got to be kidding." Schlesinger closed his eyes and said primly: "A simple 'No' will suffice."[4] Bennett was invited to speak at Schlesinger's memorial service held on 30 September 2003. Feeling that the bath house story would be inappropriate, he gave Schlesinger's own account of his investiture with the CBE. John was so aware of his sexuality that he managed to detect a corresponding awareness in the unlikeliest of places. On this occasion HMQ had a momentary difficulty getting the ribbon round his sizeable neck, whereupon she said "Now, Mr. Schlesinger, we must try and get this straight," the emphasis according to John very much hers and which he took as both a coded acknowledgement of his situation and a seal of royal approval.[5] Death Schlesinger underwent a quadruple heart bypass in 1998, before suffering a stroke in December 2000. He was taken off life support at Desert Regional Medical Center in Palm Springs on 24 July 2003 by his life partner of over 30 years, photographer Michael Childers. Schlesinger died early the following day at the age of 77. Filmography Feature and television films (as Director) A Kind of Loving (1962) Billy Liar (1963) Darling (1965) Far From the Madding Crowd (1967) Midnight Cowboy (1969) Sunday Bloody Sunday (1971) Visions of Eight (1973) The Day of the Locust (1975) Marathon Man (1976) Yanks (1979) Honky Tonk Freeway (1981) Privileged (1982) Separate Tables (1983) (TV) An Englishman Abroad (1983) (TV) The Falcon and the Snowman (1985) The Believers (1987) Madame Sousatzka (1988) Pacific Heights (1990) A Question of Attribution (1991) (TV) The Innocent (1993) Cold Comfort Farm (1995) (TV) Eye for an Eye (1996) The Tale of Sweeney Todd (1998) (TV) The Next Best Thing (2000) |
June 11th, 2011 | #66 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Shag the Dog
By William Saletan Posted Thursday, April 5, 2001 Years ago, advocates of sexual abstinence came up with a clever motto to instill chastity in youngsters. "Pet your dog, not your date," they preached. They may live to regret those words. The love that dare not bark its name is now a front-page topic, raised at White House news conferences and in state legislatures, thanks largely to philosopher Peter Singer. In an essay titled "Heavy Petting," Singer asks: What's wrong with fondling Fido? The essay, coupled with two scandals involving sex with dogs—one confirmed in Maine and the other alleged by investigators in California—has elicited cries of outrage and disgust. But the outcry has been largely thoughtless. It's easy to say that becoming more than friendly with man's best friend is wrong. What's hard is backing up that statement with a principle, and reconciling that principle with your beliefs about meat-eating, sexual orientation, or, in Singer's case, pedophilia. Singer's essay tackles a series of objections to doggie-style intimacy. The first is that it's unnatural. If nature had wanted you to mate with your pet, the argument goes, you'd be able to procreate together. Singer points out, however, that we've come to tolerate other non-procreative practices, such as contraception, masturbation, oral gratification, and homosexuality. But isn't sex with animals a uniquely radical affront to tradition? Nope. Dog-bites-man is the oldest story around. Singer cites literary and anthropological evidence that humans throughout history have been attracted to animals—swans, horses, dogs, satyrs, calves—and some have acted on that attraction. OK, but aren't these acts cruel and harmful? Not necessarily, says Singer. "Sex with animals does not always involve cruelty." So why the taboo? According to Singer, it's because we think we're intrinsically and categorically superior to other species. This is the dogma that Singer really wants to penetrate. "We are animals," he writes. "This does not make sex across the species barrier normal, or natural, whatever those much-misused words may mean, but it does imply that it ceases to be an offence to our status and dignity as human beings." Conservative editorialists have doggedly denounced and ridiculed Singer's argument. None of them, however, has explained what's wrong with it. The answer matters, because the principle that makes sex with animals immoral—whatever that principle is—must apply to other issues as well. The Weekly Standard, for instance, faults Singer's nonchalant reaction to an incident in which a lusty, "powerful" orangutan seized a woman "like a drunken frat boy." Is the Standard saying that this incident amounts to a kind of sexual harassment? Is Singer a cad for tolerating it? Then why does the Standard publish articles brushing aside "hypersensitivity to 'harassment' and 'date rape' "? Or take the Wall Street Journal editorial page. The Journal derides Singer for condoning puppy love while his animal rights buddies demand "intolerable paperwork" from researchers who use animals in lab experiments. But if we want rules about what's done to animals by their owners, why not make rules about what's done to them in labs? The same logic applies to mockery of Singer's vegetarianism. "You could say Singer's take on animal rights is: You can have sex with them, but don't eat them," jokes conservative columnist Debra Saunders. That's funny. But you could just as easily ask those of us who eat meat why, if it's wrong to rape animals, it's OK to kill them. Liberals have a different problem. Most of them want to say that sex with your dog is wrong, but sex with a human of your own gender isn't. The trouble is, Singer explicitly connects the two practices (both are non-procreative), and people who advocate sex with animals—"zoophiles," as they prefer to be called—borrow the language of gay liberation. "I'm the first out-of-the-closet 'zoo' to be attacked because of my sexual orientation," Philip Buble, a zoophile, told the Bangor Daily News four months ago. Buble says the "relationship" between man and beast "can develop to be a sexual one." Testifying before a Maine legislative committee a week ago, Buble accused proponents of a ban on animal sexual abuse of trying "to force morality on a minority. It will be a disservice to zoo couples and would keep zoo couples from coming out of the closet and drive us deeper underground." Commenting on Dearest Pet, the book that inspired Singer's essay, other zoophiles articulate an "alternative sexual lifestyle" defined by "loving relationships with their animal lovers." Then there's the case of the killer dogs in San Francisco. Last week, Marjorie Knoller and her husband, Robert Noel, were collared on manslaughter charges because two dogs in their care mauled to death their neighbor, Diane Whipple. Knoller and Noel, who are lawyers, claim they were taking care of the dogs on behalf of Paul "Cornfed" Schneider, a client whom they have adopted as their son while he serves a life sentence for attempted murder. According to a prison guard's affidavit, documents found in Schneider's possession include a photo of a male dog's genitals, "numerous photos of Knoller posing nude with fighting dog drawings," and a letter from the couple that discusses "sexual activity between Noel, Knoller and the dog" that subsequently killed Whipple. When the first vague report of the photos surfaced, Noel told the San Francisco Chronicle, "I'm not going to confirm it or deny it," adding, "There used to be a time when guy-on-guy or woman-on-woman relationships were looked at as unnatural acts. What concern is it to anybody if there is or isn't a personal relationship?" The last thing liberals want is to see homosexuality equated with this kind of animal husbandry. While portraying Whipple and her lesbian partner as a loving couple, they dismiss the Noel-Knoller-Schneider-dog "family" as a twisted sham. But what makes one family real and the other fake? Is it monogamy? Fidelity? Commitment? Effort? A New Republic article suggests as much: "[A] fundamental reason for prohibiting sex with animals is the human desire to join sex [with love] and our recognition of the complexity of that joining, the care with which it must be nurtured and disciplined, the ease with which it is disrupted and led astray." Strange as it may seem, however, it's hard to prove that Philip Buble doesn't nurture and discipline his love for the canine companion he calls "Lady Buble." He's a one-dog man. A month ago, when Buble's father was sentenced to jail for attacking him with a crowbar—in part out of disgust with Buble's "lifestyle"—Buble sent a formal request to the judge. "I'd like my significant other to attend by my side if possible as she was present in the house during the attack, though not an eyewitness to it, thank goodness," Buble wrote. "I've been informed your personal permission is needed given that my wife is not human." In his legislative testimony a week ago, Buble declared that he and Lady "live together as a married couple. In the eyes of God we are truly married." Let's try another criterion. How about harm? Many animal rights activists say this is what's wrong with human-animal copulation, as opposed to gay sex. But that dog won't hunt, either. Singer points out that some sex acts between humans and animals "don't seem to do harm to animals." Is Buble harming the dog for whose emotional well-being he expressed such concern in his letter to the judge? Good luck proving it. In last week's testimony, Buble said zoophiles are born to care for animals. He denied that their physical interaction with their pets includes abuse. And he added that zoophiles do far less harm to animals than hunters, meat-eaters, and medical experiments do. It's hard to argue with that. How about consent? Village Voice columnist Norah Vincent argues that homosexuality is permissible because "sexual acts between consenting adults should be beyond the prurient reach of the state." However, When someone has sex with an animal, he foists himself on a creature that has the mental and emotional capacity of a child. Thus, it is no more capable than a child of giving meaningful consent. … [I]f you have had sex with someone who is constitutionally incapable of giving anything that might constitute meaningful consent, you have committed rape. At the very least you have taken advantage of a creature over which you exercise considerable power. Now we're onto something. The evidence that consent is morally essential—and that animals don't really give it—comes from zoophiles themselves. Dearest Pet reportedly suggests that many artistic images of male animals penetrating women are fantasies projected by men. The usual scenario, according to more reliable records cited in the book, is a man penetrating an animal for his own satisfaction. Singer essentially concedes his vulnerability on the consent issue by ducking it. He defends one scenario in which a dog tries to mount a human visitor's leg, and another in which an orangutan grabs a female attendant. Each scenario presumes the animal's initiative. Likewise, Buble goes through a dog-and-pony show to persuade people that his pet consents to their putative marriage. His letter to the judge included, next to his signature, a paw print purporting to represent the signature of "Lady Buble." But in forging his partner's consent, Buble screwed the pooch. Readers of the letter recognized that the paw print had been drawn by hand, and a Daily News reader discerned another discrediting detail: "I also noticed in the picture of Buble and his Lady that the Ms. wears a choke collar. A willing participant indeed." So one mystery is solved. If you want to say that contraception, sodomy, and homosexuality are OK but sex with animals isn't, you can stipulate (as Slate's "Chatterbox" does) that sex is permissible only if both parties consent to it. This still leaves you with the problem of explaining why it's OK to kill and eat animals. But two other mysteries remain. One is Singer's position on consent. Does he think sex without consent is immoral? What mental capacities are necessary to give consent? Do animals have those capacities? Who else has those capacities? This line of questioning converges with the other mystery. "One by one, the taboos have fallen," Singer writes in his review of Dearest Pet, building up to the subject of zoophilia. The book's publisher calls sex with animals "the last taboo." But it can't be the last taboo, because there's another subject on which Singer, while freely discussing the charms and merits of zoophilia, seems strangely muzzled. The telling issue—the dog that didn't bark—is pedophilia. A philosopher's duty is to clarify his principles and defend their consistent application. Those who embrace the principle of consent, and who agree that an animal "is no more capable than a child of giving meaningful consent," have done both. They have stated their principle and applied it to sex with children. What about Singer? He has often compared the mental ability of higher animals to that of children. Does he think this level of comprehension is sufficient to give consent to sex? If the answer is no, isn't zoophilia wrong? If the answer is yes, isn't pedophilia OK? Dog paddling, an old dog's new tricks, dog-eat-dog, a three-dog night—that's kid stuff. You want to take on a real taboo, Professor Singer? Stand up and be a man. http://www.slate.com/id/103801/ Quote:
|
|
June 11th, 2011 | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
100,000 Turn Out for 'Gay Pride' Parade in Tel Aviv
Thousands of people took part in the Tel Aviv gay pride parade on Friday, held under heavy security. Several main roads in the city were blocked for traffic.
Dancers, singers and speakers graced the stage of the main event at the Meir Park, including Opposition Chairwoman Tzipi Livni and Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai. http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...080379,00.html |
June 11th, 2011 | #68 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,414
|
Jews have been behind the legitimization of homosexuality and sexual deviance since Humanist Manifesto I, and before...
|
June 21st, 2011 | #69 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Why Does ADL Support Homosexuality?
Why Does ADL Support Homosexuality?
quote: " The ADL knows that the fastest way to destroy existing society is through homosexuality. Historically, no nation pervaded by sodomy endured for long. It’s for this reason that Jewish Bolshevik Bella Kuhn, conquering Hungary after the Russian Revolution in 1917, force-fed homosexuality into the curriculum of public education, transforming Hungary’s youth into moral degenerates. The same thing is happening today as ADL promotes homosexuality in our school system, even from the kindergarten level. Several years ago, through Barnes and Noble bookstores, ADL promoted homosexuality through their “No Place for Hate” program. It encouraged families visiting the bookstores to invite a homosexual couple to their home for an evening. This would teach kids, ADL suggested, that there’s no truth in Christian judgments against sodomy. Gays, ADL says, are some of the nicest, most non-threatening folks your kids can get to know. In major US cities, ADL indoctrinates city governments, schools, even liberal churches, that Biblical Christians are gripped by a psychiatric disorder: “homophobia.” ADL says bigoted Christians persecute homosexuals, and are motivated by “hate literature,” the Bible. Outlawing Criticism of Sodomy Yet ADL wants more than to persuade our children to become homosexuals. It seeks special legal protection for homosexuality, making it a “hate crime” to exhibit bias or discrimination against those who practice it. ADL wants homosexuals protected, not just in housing, employment and same-sex marriage, but even from words! ADL claims it should be illegal to even criticize same-sex behaviors in public. To create these laws, ADL has contrived a twisted definition of hate: “bias” against homosexuality. In countries such as Canada, thanks to ADL/B’nai B’rith federal and provincial hate laws, public expressions of such bias on the air waves, print media, or even on the street corner, can mean exorbitant fines or imprisonment. If a talk show host even suggests that homosexuals have a higher rate of AIDS, he can be fined and jailed, and the radio station airing his “hate” can lose its broadcast license. http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/j...sexuality.html |
July 1st, 2011 | #70 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Kameny, Frank (b. 1925)
Frank Kameny is one of the founding fathers of the American gay rights movement. He helped radicalize the homophile movement, preparing the way for the mass movement for equality initiated by the Stonewall Rebellion of 1969. He was born Franklin Edward Kameny on May 21, 1925, into a New York middle-class Jewish family. A prodigy who had taught himself to read by the age of four, he entered Queens College at the age of 15 to study physics. He interrupted his education, however, to serve in the armed forces during World War II. After the war he returned to his studies, and in 1956 he received a Ph.D. in astronomy from Harvard University. Upon graduation Kameny moved to Washington, D. C. to join the faculty of Georgetown University. In July 1957, after one year of teaching, Kameny obtained a civil service job as an astronomer with the United States Army Map Service and began what he hoped would be a fulfilling scientific career. However, events over the next couple of years changed the direction of his life forever. Late one night in 1957, Kameny was arrested on a morals charge in Lafayette Park, a popular gay cruising area in Washington, D. C. He was released, and nothing immediately came of the incident. It was not long afterward, however, that an investigator from the Civil Service Commission came to question him about rumors that he was a homosexual. That fall, after serving in his job for only a few months, Kameny was fired from the Map Service, and early the next year he learned that he had been barred from all future employment in the federal government. A victim of the McCarthy-era regulations that branded homosexuals as potential traitors and unfit for government employment, Kameny found his career in ruins. This experience drove Kameny to militant activism. "My dismissal amounted to a declaration of war against me by the government," Kameny later said, "and I tend not to lose my wars." Kameny attempted to sue the government to get his job back, a lengthy process that went through several appeals. However, all his legal efforts came to naught, including filing his own petition to the United States Supreme Court, which was denied in 1961. Having failed to achieve his goal as an individual, he resolved that it was time to organize and work within a group. Kameny and his friend Jack Nichols established the Mattachine Society of Washington, D. C. in August 1961. Although the Washington group took its name from the Los Angeles-based homophile organization, the two were not affiliated. The Mattachine Society of Washington, D. C.'s first official meeting was held on November 15, 1961 and drew about a dozen men and women. Kameny was elected as the group's first president. In opposition to many gay leaders at the time, Kameny embraced direct action and sought contact with public officials rather than hiding from them. Kameny believed that gay people should fight a "down-to-earth, grass-roots, sometimes tooth-and-nail battle" against discrimination. Under Kameny's leadership, the Mattachine Society of Washington, D. C. charged to the forefront of the emerging homophile movement, in many ways anticipating the militancy that was to be unleashed among gay men and lesbians generally by the Stonewall Rebellion of 1969. Reflecting the specific concerns of its Washington, D. C. members, Kameny's group focused its efforts on removing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation from civil service employment, as well as on granting gay men and lesbians security clearances and qualifying them for service in the military. In April 1965, the group organized the first gay demonstration at the White House. A dozen or so gay men and lesbians, including Kameny and Barbara Gittings, dressed in business attire, carried signs reading "First Class Treatment for Homosexuals" and "Civil Service Commission is Un-American." A few months after that demonstration, the U. S. Court of Appeals issued a ground-breaking decision. The court held that rejection of an application for federal employment on the grounds of "homosexual conduct" was "too vague." The Civil Service Commission, the court ruled, failed to state "why [homosexuality] related to occupational competence or fitness." After a number of similar court decisions were handed down over the next ten years, the Civil Service Commission finally amended its anti-gay policy in 1975. The Mattachine D. C. group also published, irregularly, a newsletter, The Gazette, which they mailed not only to members but also to politicians and policy makers throughout Washington, including J. Edgar Hoover, director of the F. B. I. In fact, an F. B. I. agent once met with Kameny and requested that Hoover be taken off the mailing list. However, Hoover's name remained on the list until his death in 1972. In addition to battling discrimination in civil service employment, Kameny also sought to challenge the negative images of homosexuals prevalent in the 1960s. Toward that goal, he coined the slogan "Gay is Good." The slogan was later adopted by the 1968 North American Conference of Homophile Organizations (NACHO). In 1971 Kameny participated in the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, where he accused psychiatrists of victimizing gay men and women with their unscientific theories of homosexuality. He urged the APA to remove homosexuality from its list of psychiatric illnesses, which the organization eventually did in 1973. In 1971, Kameny became the first openly gay person to run for congress. Competing for D. C.'s non-voting seat in the House of Representatives, Kameny came in fourth among six candidates. He used the campaign to call attention to the inequities experienced by homosexuals in a country in which the government "wages a relentless war against us." Kameny is also a cofounder of the National Gay Task Force and the Gay Rights National Lobby. In 1975, he was appointed a Commissioner of the D. C. Commission on Human Rights, becoming the first openly gay municipal appointee. He also personally drafted the bill that repealed D. C.'s sodomy law, which was finally enacted in 1993. In recent years, Kameny has finally received the recognition he is due, not only from the glbtq community, but from the United States itself. In 2006, for example, the Library of Congress acquired Kameny's papers; and in 2007 the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of American History featured the picket signs he carried in front of the White House in 1965 in its exhibit "Treasures of American History." In February 2009, Kameny's home in Washington was designated as a D.C. Historic Landmark by the District of Columbia's Historic Preservation Review Board. Perhaps most gratifying of all, on June 29, 2009, John Berry, Director of the Office of Personnel Management in the Obama administration, formally apologized to Kameny on behalf of the U.S. government. Berry, who is openly gay, characterized the government's firing of him as a "shameful action," and also presented Kameny with the Theodore Roosevelt Award, the department's most prestigious award. http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/kameny_f.html |
May 4th, 2012 | #71 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
"Pro-Homosexual 'GCB' Reflects Liberal Jewish Agenda "
PRO-GAY "GCB" REFLECTS LIBERAL JEWISH AGENDABy Rev. Ted Pike
2 May 12 quoteFor at least the past decade, ABC has aggressively portrayed homosexual characters as normal, funny and endearing. In 2011, ABC received an excellent rating from GLAAD for its inclusive portrayals of homosexuality, which occur in 55 percent of its primetime programming. Good Christian Bitches is nothing new in its glowing depiction of gay characters. It only breaks ground by blatantly contrasting the likable homosexual, Blake, to backstabbing Christian hypocrites. He exudes charm as he initiates sexual relationships, Brokeback Mountain-style, with the foremen who work on his ranch. He is a pillar of the church and kind husband to a wife with her own sexual arrangements. Jewish executive producer Darren Star and Jewish homosexual director Alan Poul present him as lovable and loyal. (See The Jews Behind Good Christian Bitches (GCB)) In contrast, ABC consistently portrays heterosexual “Christian” marriages as dysfunctional, unsustainable and supremely uninviting. Why does big media tirelessly work to normalize deviant sexuality and break down traditional marriage? To answer that question, we must go back to the origins of liberalism in America. Consider the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. In 1918 Winston Churchill, in an article in the Illustrated Sunday Herald, said: There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian revolution by these international and, for the most part, atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principle inspiration and driving power came from the Jewish leaders… And it may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of producing another system of morals and philosophy as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which, if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. It would almost seem as if the gospel of Christ and the gospel of anti-Christ were destined to originate among the same people and that this mystic and mysterious race had been chosen for the supreme manifestation both of the divine and diabolical. (See Jewish Activists Created Communism) Socialism Comes to America The Encyclopedia Judaica, in its article on Franklin D. Roosevelt, tells us a flood of Marxist Jews came to America during the early 20th century and preached socialism to the working class. Franklin Roosevelt’s liberal policies “endeared him to the Jewish community, which shared his overriding commitment to the welfare state. In fact, so pervasive was Jewish influence in Roosevelt’s experiment to socialize America that the pejorative epithet ‘Jew deal’ became prominent among anti-Semitic elements.” The Judaica describes the creation of 20th century liberalism. For more than a century, liberalism has pitted itself against Christian values and traditions. It has striven to substitute secular, immoral, globalist values that will eventually make America amenable to participation in a Zionist-controlled new world order. (See 'Babylon the Great' is Israel) In all polls of American Jews, more than 80 percent are strongly liberal. The Jewish community at large supports abortion, hate crimes laws, unrestrained immigration, evolution, and radical feminism. Polls consistently show upwards of 80 percent of Jews voted for Obama as well as Democrats in Congress. The same percentage endorse same-sex marriage. Jews dominate such anti-Christian “civil liberties” groups as the American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Poverty Law Center, and People for the American Way. No Jewish attack group more completely represents the liberal Jewish community than the Anti-Defamation League. While Jewish-dominated Hollywood and "big three" TV networks have normalized homosexuality in culture, ADL has worked to establish it legally and make homosexuality not only protected but privileged. ADL’s pro-homosexual influence can be seen in California. In 2007 California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law S.B. 777, legislation replete with ADL language. It outlaws Biblical criticism of homosexuality in public schools. Christians must watch their kids be corrupted by an educational system that demonizes their “bias” against sodomy. This ban on the Bible is not a rare edict. It's the result of massive, purposeful social engineering throughout the past half century but begun in earnest in 1985 by ADL. ADL is architect of "anti-bias" educational programs worldwide. America was founded on tolerance, as a place where people of widely diverse races, religions, and creeds could follow their convictions free of persecution. But America's founders hardly believed vice should be embraced! Early Americans believed the opposite: Families, social groups and even government should encourage "bias" against all forms of vice. These include robbery, graft, prostitution, and that vice so unnatural it was virtually unmentionable: sodomy. In the early 1980s, Jewish-dominated media determined to create as much damage as possible from the 60's sexual revolution they promoted. They encouraged not just drug culture, abortion and fornication but especially "gay rights." In league with Jewish media, ADL's social re-engineering of America and the world has been largely accomplished through its massive "World of Difference" educational program. In 1985 ADL began an educational thrust that encompassed all levels of public education, government, corporations, and social organizations. ADL relentlessly taught millions there must be no bias against race, religion, or "sexual orientation." All bias is very bad. No one is entitled to claim that his religion or sexual orientation is right and another's wrong. When we convince ourselves that our way is the "right way," we are more likely to strike out at those who are different. In fact, intolerance of differences is at the roots of most violence. (See http://www.adl.org/guide/default.asp) First Step: Make Bias Socially Taboo To eventually criminalize bias against homosexuality, ADL first had to make it a violation of social norms. Since 1985 "more than 375,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, responsible for nearly 12 million students," have participated in ADL's "World of Difference" program. These included anti-bias programs beginning as early as ages 3-5. Lesson formats such as "I Belong to Many Groups" foster global, not religious or national, loyalty. ADL sensitivity training programs in corporate America taught business owners to defer to homosexuals. Decades of conditioning prepared American businesses for ADL's workplace bias crime laws on the federal and state level. In 2004 ADL introduced their "No Place for Hate" program, which boldly encourages American families to embrace homosexuality, same-sex marriage, etc. "No Place for Hate" literature has been promoted by Barnes and Noble bookstores and at local chapters across the nation. It encourages families with young children to invite a homosexual couple for dinner, fun, and fellowship. This, ADL says, will help destroy any “homophobic” attitudes developing in young minds. ADL also teaches law enforcement at all levels to recognize and report bias crimes. It conditions US Justice Department officials, FBI, and all police departments to believe verbal "intimidation" of homosexuals is a hate crime and that "gay bashing" may well be traceable to evangelical pulpits. The Fruits of ADL's Labors In the 1980s ADL led countless young people away from Biblical "homophobic" bias against homosexuality. They now teach police, jurists, and administrators who guide and enforce America's public policy. As in Canada and now California, this policy increasingly privileges homosexuals, viewing them as beleaguered victims of Christian intolerance. For 27 years ADL has cultivated, watered and fertilized the moral and cultural soil of America toward acceptance of homosexuality. It was no surprise when the first openly lesbian member of California's state assembly, Jewish Sheila Koehl, submitted a bill, SB777, banning criticism of homosexuality in the public school systems. Signing it into law, Gov. Schwarzenegger enshrined on the legislative level a program of moral transformation begun decades earlier by ADL. Yet ADL remains unexposed, unidentified, and uncriticized by Christian evangelicals and their leaders. Why the silence? ADL is 100 percent Jewish. Most evangelicals believe God will "curse" the nation or person who criticizes Jews (Gen. 12:3). Their leaders, though largely aware of ADL origins of hate laws and organized anti-Christianity, fear they will also be cursed by a mass exodus of support if they criticize “God's chosen people.” If the church remains silent concerning those who invented and foment "anti-bias" laws, there is little to ultimately restrain passage of a virtual epidemic of hate laws identical to S.B. 777. This is exactly what is happening now as ADL-inspired “anti-bullying” laws, which make it a hate crime to criticize homosexuality in the public schools, are rapidly passed state by state. California’s Anti-ADL Rabbi Nachum Shifren is an Orthodox rabbi in California who has been ostracized by the vast majority of Jews, who are secular and liberal. He agrees ADL is playing the central role in corrupting America, so that its own twisted Jewish world order can be established. Shifren, in an article in NewsWithViews (See The ADL vs. Faith and Freedom by Nachum Shifren), says, There is a…sinister group that has done more damage to the Jews and caused more murder and destruction than all of Israel’s enemies combined… This second camp is about control of human beings. It holds a vision of a one-world order, together with Marx, Trotsky, and Lenin—an evil, that to date, has claimed nearly 200 million souls. With these international bandits and mind-control wizards stands the ADL (Anti-Defamation league)…. The ADL’s agenda is simple: anything that will increase their power and control is good…. In order for there to be a One-World Order, man’s spirit and soul must be brought low, subjugated to the level of the beasts. This was the communist credo, to claim that we are no better than animals that must be controlled. G-d must be destroyed, faith debauched, and religion—All Religion. In this camp we find the ADL. …Why is the ADL, supposedly the ‘sentinel’ of the Jewish people, so disposed to the rights and whims of radical gay and lesbian groups? Is this the purview of the ADL? The answer lies in one simple concept: power and control. What the Soviets could not do in Russia, the ADL will attempt to do in America. Shifren says the ADL wants to “be positioned to establish a massive, pervasive, and Fascist bureaucracy that will monitor every single American and impose in this country Nazi Germany-style control—the ultimate vision of the leftist ADL.” Toward this end, he says, Massive mind control about bias is even now being established in education—inculcating our youth from kindergarten through college about politically correct speech. Churches that do not hire homosexuals will be jailed. . . Here in California, our insane legislature just passed such a bill, a bill that will fire faculty or expel students that make a slip of the tongue. Isn’t it amazing? We’re not allowed to have the Ten Commandments in our schools. No minute of prayer, but plenty of mind control of how the White Christians have destroyed the earth and must be neutralized. The day of the multiculturalists is here, aided and abetted by the ADL, using “hate speech” as the Trojan horse that will destroy our once great America. Time to Identify Jewish Liberal Corruptors In 2010 I wrote an article entitled “The Jews Behind ENDA” in which I exposed the existence of a flood of pro-homosexual Jews overwhelmingly dominating all aspects of gay rights leadership in America. I counted 59 Jews controlling the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD), Parents and Families of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAAG), National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce. Soon after my article was widely distributed on dozens of websites, an amazing thing began to happen. Gentiles were substituted in homosexual national leadership! A year later, it had become difficult to find any Jews except Joe Solomenese in gay rights leadership. What happened? Clearly, Jews dove for cover in reaction to public identification as drivers of the homosexual revolution. They didn’t want exposed the ethnic/religious identity of those primarily behind the liberal agenda. That would threaten the huge evangelical donations flowing into Israel as well as the halo that circles modern Judaism in the American consciousness. We can similarly intimidate ADL, SPLC, ACLU and Jewish-dominated mass media (See Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish) by stopping the unbiblical protection of Jewish activists. It’s time to identify them as the primary opponents to Christianity and conservatism in the west. This is truth, not anti-Semitism. It’s time to stop saying hate crime and same-sex marriage laws are the work of liberals and homosexuals. It’s time to give credit (and blame) where it is due: ADL and secular Judaism. Only when Christians stop giving aid and comfort to these wreckers of our civilization can there be hope of arresting America’s decline. Only then, accompanied by significant national repentance, can our battered nation begin to rebuild. http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/P...ishAgenda.html |
May 5th, 2012 | #72 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
|
|
May 5th, 2012 | #73 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Wrong Parallel Universe
Posts: 3,499
|
Quote:
|
|
May 5th, 2012 | #74 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
Not to be rude, or overstep my bounds.....but what does this have to do with WNism?
|
February 19th, 2013 | #75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Kike "music executive" Clive Davis' bisexuality "is a welcome relief"
Quote:
|
|
March 20th, 2013 | #76 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
CHILD BUGGERY A-OK Wrote Big Jew Homo Activist
Quote:
Self-absorbed Jews, like homo Larry Kramer, love using the word “Holocaust,” even when it comes to AIDS — a truly foul disease spread by these sick sodomites. http://incogman.net/2013/03/child-bu...st/#more-94104 |
|
May 17th, 2013 | #77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Queer is the New Pink: How Queer Jews Moved to the Forefront of Jewish Culture
Quote:
|
|
May 22nd, 2013 | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Biden: Jewish Leaders Drove Gay Marriage Changes
Quote:
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...7#.UZxK16zLf8R |
|
May 23rd, 2013 | #79 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Queer Jew Named Head Of American Psychiatric Association
"The APA has played a key role in the advancement of LGBT rights since the early 1970s when, following years of advocacy by gay activists, the organization removed homosexuality from its longstanding classification as a mental illness in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) of Mental Disorders."
http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/...ociation-apa/? |
May 26th, 2013 | #80 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Lesbian Love Story Wins Top Honor At Cannes
Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|