Southern Culture These Days

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by Jethro

I'm sure you have noticed their tendency to glide over that point: nothing good came out of the defeat of the South in the War Between the States, unless you count almost half the (now useless) niggers in America moving to the North as God's sense of humor.

Yep, not an honest man in the bunch.

Desegregation: The Boston Busing Crisis - YouTube

Desegregation: The Boston Busing Crisis - YouTube

Forced Busing in Boston: Desegregation of Schools_JF MG - YouTube

Forced Busing in Boston: Desegregation of Schools_JF MG - YouTube

Desegregating Baltimore City Schools - YouTube

Desegregating Baltimore City Schools - YouTube

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by Leonard Rouse

Has there ever been a book written on the nigger 'experience' in the north after the WbtS. . .or more importantly, that of white northerners confronted with the genuine article for the first time--as opposed to fevered abolitionist bullshit?

NORTH EXPOSED TO CIVIL WAR *JUST DESERTS*

The various civil-rights acts and the diminishment of prejudice produced changes in the political arena; African Americans became increasingly elected to public office. In 1966, Edward Brooke became the first African American to be elected to the U.S. Senate since Reconstruction, and, in 1967, Carl Stokes became the first African American to be elected mayor of a major American city (Cleveland). Many major cities, among them New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, have since elected black mayors. In 1984 and 1988, Jesse Jackson campaigned for the Democratic nomination for president, becoming the first black to contend seriously for that office. Douglas Wilder became first African American to be elected governor of a state in 1989. Gen. Colin Powell, the first African American to head the Joint Chiefs of Staff and serve as secretary of state, was the popular choice of many Republicans for the 1996 presidential nomination, although he declined to run.

MORE: http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/history/A0858852.html

[Leonard Rouse]

I was referring to the period prior to 1900 and after war's end.

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by Leonard Rouse

I was referring to the period prior to 1900 and after war's end.

I know you were, but I'm having trouble finding any relevant reference materials.

[Fred O'Malley]

This is an historical account, it is pretty long, but well 'sub-headed' for quick referencing.

The shattered south: AD 1865

The cost of four years of war has been massive on both sides, in men and money alike. The north has more of each and loses more of each: about 360,000 Union soldiers killed compared to 260,000 Confederates; some $5 billion spent as opposed to $3 billion.

But this is money spent on the war, not the cost of the destruction of buildings and of industrial and agricultural capacity. These other costs fall almost entirely on the south, where nearly all the fighting takes place (even before the devastation caused by Sherman in 1864). By contrast the industries of the north go through a boom period, servicing the war effort at government expense.

Both sides introduce income tax for the first time to pay for the war. Other forms of tax, tariff and duty are raised to unprecedented heights. Government bonds are issued to bring in money.

But there is more private [jewish] wealth in the north for the government to borrow. The south has to resort more recklessly to printing money. The result is crippling inflation. By the end of the war a Confederate dollar is worth 1.5 cents in Union money. To buy a pair of boots in Richmond in 1864 costs $200. Butter is $15 a pound.

Inflation, starvation and physical ruin are frequently the aftermath of a major war. But in the south in 1865 there are other unprecedented problems. The whole economic basis of southern life has been transformed.

Some four million slaves have been freed. For the small minority of the white population who owned slaves (less than 5% of the total) this represents a major financial loss; in 1860 the price of a healthy young male Negro in New Orleans was $1800. In addition the planters now have to pay wages to the former slaves working their plantations, and the amount of work which can be extracted from them is much reduced. Previously they slaved from dawn to dusk. Now they work a labourer's day of nine or ten hours.

This change in itself reduces by as much as a third the productivity of the great cotton plantations. Meanwhile the world price of cotton has been falling, with rival supplies from India and elsewhere undercutting the southern product. For all these reasons 'king cotton' no longer reigns. The riches which once supported the life style of the southern planters are no longer available.

The rest of the whites, many of them poor, suffer in the economic depression. For them a large free black labour force also represents an economic threat. Add deeply ingrained racial prejudice and an enhanced resentment of the north, and it is clear that the south is a somewhat intractable problem for the federal government.

Read more: http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/...#ixzz28r42jy6e

[Leonard Rouse]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

I know you were, but I'm having trouble finding any relevant reference materials.

Yeah. What I asked was partially a genuine question, but partially a point: I don't think the discussion has ever taken place seriously. There's nothing to find.

A massive movement of sub-humans from South to north? It's a major incident in American history. But it's rarely discussed because the truth hurts: Niggers are niggers in north, South, or the moon.

I've only ever heard some far-left illiberals maundering about 'endemic racism' or somesuch. Usually it's a kike taking a shot at WASPs. . .Connecticut well-to-dos putatively 'mistreating' their nigger help.

I wonder how many northern industrialists thought they were going to get rich with all the 'cheap' nigger labor heading their way. You know it didn't take them a month to realize they were worthless.

Still, I wonder how that thought of profit affected immigration policy. . .Irish, Italians, Eastern Europeans.

[Jethro]

In the North, the taxpayers subsidize Jew academics who churn out studies that tell them niggers are enriching their neighborhoods. They are dumb enough to actually swallow their lies and vote for Obama for they will have a nigger president.

[Fred O'Malley]

New attitudes were seen towards the topic of slavery because of the Revolutionary War, especially in the North. It inspired a spirit of liberty and an appreciation of the work of the work of all black soldiers (slaves). Some of the Northern legislatures adopted laws during the late 1700s that provided for the end of slavery immediately or gradually. The census of 1790 revealed that the nation had about 59,000 free blacks and this included 27,000 from the North. After the Revolutionary War, a lot of the free blacks were able to find jobs at the tobacco plants, the textile mills, and other factories. (while whites in the south starved) Some found even better jobs, some became editors and others became merchants. One of the best editors were Samuel Cornish and John Russwurm, who helped start the first black newspaper in 1827. A lot of the whites treated the free blacks as if they were inferior to them. They were not allowed in certain places such as hotels, theaters, restaurants, and other public places. Other disadvantages that they had even though they were free was that they were not allowed to vote, and the children had to attend separate schools from the whites. Also
colleges and universities with the exception of Bowdoin and Oberlin, did not accept any blacks.

In the North as well as in the South inside the churches unless they were all blacks attending it, the blacks had to sit apart from the whites. In 1816, Richard Allen who was a black Philadelphia minister helped to establish the first black denomination in the country. The continuous increase of free blacks in the North as well as in the South was beginning to alarm the whites, and so they began stating some more constrictions with the activities the blacks had. In most of New England the blacks could not visit any town without a pass. By 1860, the nation had about 490,000 free blacks, and even though they were free they received so much discrimination that they thought they were only a little better off than the slaves. Most of the abolitionist leaders attacked slavery in their writings and their public speeches. William Lloyd
Garrison which was one of their leaders established an antislavery newspaper, called The Liberator, in 1831. Douglass, who was the most influential black leader published an abolitionists newspaper called The North Star in 1847. A tension that began in the South in 1859, led to raids which were said to begin or lead to fights between the North and the South.
MORE: http://cghs.dadeschools.net/slavery/...acks.north.htm

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by Leonard Rouse

Still, I wonder how that thought of profit affected immigration policy. . .Irish, Italians, Eastern Europeans.

You can find that here: http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/...#ixzz28r42jy6e

[America First]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

Yep, not an honest man in the bunch.

Desegregation: The Boston Busing Crisis - YouTube

Forced Busing in Boston: Desegregation of Schools_JF MG - YouTube

Desegregating Baltimore City Schools - YouTube

Next door school districts with jooish children attending were never affected.

[R. Pearson]

Why are Small Southern Colleges Suddenly Attracting Jews in Record Numbers?

While large Southern colleges like Emory, Tulane, and the University of Texas at Austin have long been popular choices for Jewish students, small schools beneath the Mason-Dixon have traditionally been devoid of a significant Jewish presence. Now, thanks to a mix of administrative initiatives and organic student efforts, Jewish populations at schools like Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Millsaps College in Jackson, Miss., the College of Charleston in South Carolina, and Elon University in Elon, North Carolina, among others, are experiencing rapid growth.

While Northern Jews often assume that the Bible Belt is a homogenous and xenophobic place, no students, advisers, or administrators noted any increased anti-Semitism on campus in response to the growing Jewish populations.

In fact, small Southern schools have a history of welcoming Jews. Through the 1940s, when both covert and overt quotas limited Jewish populations at elite Northeastern schools, Southern colleges remained open to Jews. While the large Southern public universities had the largest Jewish populations, there was also some presence at the smaller private schools as well. When the quota system officially ended in the late 1940s, Northern Jews flocked to Northeastern universities, establishing a large and steady presence at many elite institutions. Meanwhile, the Jewish populations at the small Southern schools withered.

According to a 2002 Wall Street Journal article, “Something else is driving the quest for more Jews…about which Vanderbilt is unusually forthright. It wants them to raise its academic standing.” According to Stuart Rockoff, director of the History Department at the Goldring / Woldenberg Institute for Southern Jewish Life, “These schools are obsessed with their ranking. Their thought is that if you are attracting Jewish kids you are attracting better kids.”

Today, these communities are being slowly resurrected. Students and faculty alike described a fascination with Jewish customs among non-Jewish students. This, leaders say, is healthy, a strong motivator for the community to increase its exposure. One of the most popular programs at each of these schools is the annual construction of a sukkah, which Jewish and non-Jewish students both visit. On this new frontier of Jewish student settlement, encounters like these speak to an experience that goes beyond administrative concerns about school rankings.

http://newvoices.org/2008/11/24/0003-2/

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by R. Pearson

Why are Small Southern Colleges Suddenly Attracting Jews in Record Numbers?

http://newvoices.org/2008/11/24/0003-2/

If they intend to run the world, they'll need a lot of branch offices, no?

[R. Pearson]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

If they intend to run the world, they'll need a lot of branch offices, no?

What does this say about Southern Culture when it actively recruits jewish students to raise its standards?

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by R. Pearson

What does this say about Southern Culture when it actively recruits jewish students to raise its standards?

It says our institutions of higher learning are in the wrong hands.

[R. Pearson]

Originally Posted by Fred O'Malley

It says our institutions of higher learning are in the wrong hands.

That's the point - they're in Southern hands and have mostly Southern students. This goes right back to the original video posted by Linder. It's no wonder Southerners believe jews to be their saviors.

[Jason 916]

Originally Posted by Roy Wagahuski

They're right to be on guard, too. A south full of niggers is nasty enough, last thing that poor region needs is an exodus of pushy, pothead faggotlanders and their shitty politics crashing the county, not unlike their 60 million amigos back home.

Stay the fuck out of other people's states.



Women. No surprise there.

Yeah, because we're all "pushy pothead faggotlanders" out here. Not like the south is being invaded by "amigos," too, eh?

Yeah, I'll pretty much go wherever the fuck I want to, as far as that goes. I'm a racially-conscious White man, remember?

[Fred O'Malley]

Originally Posted by R. Pearson

That's the point - they're in Southern hands and have mostly Southern students.

Well, I wouldn't mind southerners educated (not indoctrinated) in yankee schools, then coming home to teach. However, I don't want to turn over southern minds to yankee teachers. We want our culture, as difficult as you and others find to believe.

We are the South, we don't want to be the north. You can keep your values and propagandized minds, we are "happy in our own skin."

[Fred O'Malley]

I believe that we can clear up the reasons for the civil war by reading the reasons the states themselves gave.

Secession Acts of the Thirteen Confederate States

[Roy Wagahuski]

[gotta love a good ending]

Ala. man gets 2 years in jail for viral BCS video
Posted: Thursday, November 29, 2012

NEW ORLEANS (AP) - An Alabama football fan got a dressing-down and two years in prison for obscenity in a viral video with an unconscious LSU fan after last year's championship game.

State District Judge Karen Herman told Brian Downing of Smiths Station, Ala., that he's a bully who has permanently damaged someone else's life.

Downing declined to say anything before the judge sentenced him as part of a plea deal.

He pleaded guilty in October to two counts of obscenity for rubbing his genitals on the LSU fan. Prosecutors dropped a charge of sexual battery, which is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

The incident took place last January after Alabama defeated LSU at the Superdome to claim the BCS title.