|
February 7th, 2006 | #41 | |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
Quote:
Liberal arts majors shouldn't try this, JP. The speed of light is about 300,000 kilometers per second. That is, about 186,000 miles per second. There is no human on earth, and probably no camera that could detect a visual difference in timing of events at the distance to the WTC of an observer. You are smart JP, but don't overreach. Enkidu
__________________
Hunter S. Thompson, "Big dark, coming soon" |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #42 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
No they are not uniform in the manner that controlled demolitions are uniform and visible. Those clearly aren't even explosions.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #43 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 7th, 2006 | #44 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Anyone who calls that "uniform" or believes that looks like "squibs" has either never seen a controlled demolition or doesn't understand English.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #45 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 928
|
get a life
Quote:
This is just some so-called "military expert", one man. It's not the Finnish Military. There are civilian hacks on the local news who are "military experts". Get real! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #46 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
They'll get a Finnish "military expert", a Russian general, a physics professor a pilot- anybody BUT A DEMOLITIONS EXPERT!
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #47 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 7th, 2006 | #48 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
LOOK-AT-IT, COMPARE-TO-VIDEO-OF-REAL-DEMOLITIONS.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #49 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 7th, 2006 | #50 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
The opposite of random.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #51 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The truth that there is a lot more going on in the world than what your television tells you is going to dawn on everyone sooner or later, whether they like it or not. Believe what you will but when that violent awakening of yours comes, don't say no one told you.
|
February 7th, 2006 | #52 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 7th, 2006 | #53 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
The building is in the process of collapsing at that point; demo charges go off BEFORE the building begins to collapse. See the problem is that you are looking at a collapsing building(the WTC) and not a building that has been demolished.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #54 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
February 7th, 2006 | #55 | |
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Do you have any proof of this or are we just supposed to take your word for it. I don't suppose it would be asking too much for you to explain how they managed to rig the building with demolitions without hundreds of people noticing.
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,370
|
Quote:
The mossad stole the Romulan's invisibility cloak. Just ask Mr. Spock, he'll tell you. |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #57 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The building could have been rigged over time, it's no big deal to have offshift workers doing shit in any given building, I used to work in them offshift myself and had free rein through most of the buildings.There have been plenty of witnesses reporting that there were unknown workers in those buildings offshift-some supposedly doing cable work. I heard a guy who lived near there across the river in Jersey say that he had a view of the buildings and noticed that they had a much higher number of lights on in the weeks before and he thought it strange. Rigging the building would not have been a problem. |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #58 | ||
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Quote:
Rigging for demolitions isn't that simple. It can take MONTHS to do a much smaller building and it involves drilling and knocking out walls. That is why I said the conspiracy writers need to get demolitions experts to build a model of what would need to be rigged so that we could determine how they could do it secretly. Oh, why no whistleblowers in the conspiracy?
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
||
February 7th, 2006 | #59 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
I didn't say it would have been simple, it surely took an effort, but they had the resources to do whatever it took. There are no insider whistleblowers because they either don't give a shit or they know they'd be toast. Why no insider whistleblowers on JFK? Why no insider whistleblowers on Pearl Harbor? |
|
February 7th, 2006 | #60 | ||
Marxist-Leninist
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,761
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Hey morons!! BAN ME!!! |
||
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|