Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 4th, 2013 #1
Karl Radl
The Epitome of Evil
 
Karl Radl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The Unseen University of New York
Posts: 3,130
Default Was Tom Clancy anti-Semitic?

Was Tom Clancy anti-Semitic?


Parsing through the daily news and views in the Judeosphere my eye fell upon an article written by one Benjamin Ivry in the ‘Jewish Daily Forward’ about the recently deceased best-selling military fiction writer Tom Clancy. (1)

The basis of the article is simple enough. Clancy used negative stereotypes about Israelis and thus was; as one commentator in the peanut gallery, put it: ‘a racist fuck’. Or if you want to put that in more obvious terms: Ivry is suggesting that Clancy was anti-Semitic.

Now before I comment on this I should state that I have never read anything Clancy has written (nor have I ever wanted to [the closest I have ever come was an Andy McNab novel when I was a teenager]) so I am just going to go off the general outlines of the stories and also what others have written about what Clancy wrote.

With that said I would be remiss if I didn't point out that Ivry’s article is basically that of a coward. Clancy dies and now Ivry accuses him of anti-Semitism when Clancy cannot sue him for libel/slander where-as had Clancy been alive and had then Ivry had the fortitude to accuse Clancy of being an anti-Semite then Ivry could have had his day in court to prove his case should he have so wished.

That he didn’t do this is indicative of the fact that Ivry knows that he cannot actually evidence his claim and that if it came to a legal showdown then he would stand little to no chance of actually winning such a case. Hence Ivry waits till after Clancy has died to attempt to assassinate his memory among his readers.

This assassination of memory; to use a term used by ‘holocaust’ believers, is a typical tactic of jews wanting to perpetuate the idea that historical or current individuals are in some way hostile to them (and that any such hostility is ispo facto irrational). (2) In this particular instance the case that Clancy was somehow anti-Semitic; or in Ivry’s double-speak ‘sent mixed messages’ to jewish readers, illustrates the utterly contrived nature of the charge.

In the first instance Ivry clearly doesn’t have a clue about the fact that charging someone with being ‘anti-Semitic’ is to label them as holding to a very specific intellectual position, which argues (and in my view correctly) that jews are a biological group and that as a biological group they are hostile to other groups. It is not the same thing with someone being hostile to jews as a religious group (i.e. being hostile to Judaism or anti-Judaism) or someone being hostile to Israel as a country (i.e. being hostile to Zionism or anti-Zionism): precisely because these are separate positions that can be held in differing combinations (hence why many historical anti-Semites expressed qualified supportive of Zionism). (3)

Ivry is using ‘anti-Semitic’ in its sense as a Zionist ideological trope that assumes that Zionism; and thus Israel, represents all jews because it claims to do so. This trope works by associating how Zionism views itself as the de facto representatives of all jews regardless of whether the jews concerned wish to be represented by Zionists or not.

To illustrate this we might say; to paraphrase a Polish proverb, that when you hit a jew then a jew on the other side of city cries out in pain. That is essentially what the Zionists are doing: they are declaring that if you hit one jew then you have hit all jews regardless of whether you were doing it because said individual was jewish or not.

This true in this instance because Ivry's case; such as it is, against Clancy for being 'anti-Semitic' is based not on things that Clancy said or did, but rather a very small amount of what he wrote.

Ivry states as follows:

'“The Sum of All Fears” (1991) posits that an Israeli nuclear weapon is commandeered by Palestinian terrorists. An Israeli policeman kills an Arab protestor because the policeman’s “adulterous ex-wife left him as a punishment from God because he was not measuring up to what a Jewish man should be,” as Wikipedia summarizes the character’s motivations.'

Now one wonders what on earth is 'anti-Semitic' about that plot line?

Israel is well-known to have nuclear weapons (even if it likes to deny having them) and Israelis killing Palestinian protesters for trivial reasons is also not exactly uncommon either. Any body is free to go on YouTube for example and Google 'Israeli killing Palestinian' and you get some 875,000 results!

Even if you were to doubt that then Israeli historians themselves have documented the horrific behaviour of Israeli civilians, police and military personnel towards the Palestinians. (4)

Ivry's claim seems to be based not on 'anti-Semitic' statements made by Clancy, but rather his objection to Clancy's suggestion of the highly-sexed jewish woman and the rather wimpy jewish man who is unable to please jewish women in bed. These are stereotypes to be sure, but they are commonly accepted in jewish culture as truisms and also frequently find their way into jewish dating books.

After all where does Ivry think the stereotypical fussy and seriously over-bearing jewish mother came from? While further not considering why there isn't a stereotypical over-bearing father stereotype in jewish culture.

Ivry need but consider the fact that going to the gym for many jews is considered to be goyische; i.e. something non-jews do (or in other works un-jewish), to see that the jewish idea of masculinity is actually rather emasculating. When one understands that then it can be quickly appreciated that the jewish male is more 'Hebrew Hebbie-Jeebies' than 'Hebrew Hammer'.

Essentially Ivry's case against Clancy comes down to the fact that he doesn't like the fact that Clancy portrayed jewish men as unmanly limp-wristed wimps and jewish women as ruthless man-eating sluts in a very small part of his corpus.

This is illustrated by the fact that Ivry takes issue with the depiction of a jewess in; of all things, a video game based on Clancy's work:

'Some Israeli women are highly sexualized temptresses in Clancy’s eyes, but also potential killers, as epitomized by Ayana Yacoby, an Israeli Army and Mossad fighter in his “Rainbow Six” series of video games. Wikipedia describes Ayana:

“Specialization in infiltration and intelligence gathering. Speaks fluent English and Arabic. Unmarried. Ayana is a master of the silent kill. Her training has prepared her for moving stealthily into hostile territory and neutralizing whatever threats may confront her. She is extremely intelligent with little tolerance for fools.”'

The above is clearly a very positive depiction of an Israeli jewess as it ascribes to said jewess preternatural physical and mental abilities so is actually ascribing her a form of 'chosen' status.

Ivry's taking issue with this depiction clearly shows two things:

The first is his sheer desperation to find faeces to fling at Clancy in the vain hope that some of it is going to stick. After all if Clancy's novels were replete with this sort of thing it should be easy to demonstrate and; indeed, would have been done in his lifetime.

The second is the fact that Ivry's argument is really about Clancy's depiction of jewish men (i.e. as not being manly enough which has piqued Ivry so much that he has started trying to handbag Clancy's still-warm corpse) not about Clancy being 'anti-Semitic'.

Where; if Clancy was 'anti-Semitic', are Clancy's disparaging comments about jews and his view of them as a biological group who are trying to subvert America?

That's right: no where.

So how on earth was Tom Clancy an anti-Semite?

That's right: he's 'anti-Semitic' for making Ivry have a mental crisis about his masculinity.


References


(1) http://forward.com/articles/184965/t...ewish-readers/
(2) For example see James Petras, 2006, 'The Power of Israel in the United States', 1st Edition, Clarity Press: Atlanta, p. 14
(3) For a summary of this please see: Albert Lindemann, 1997, 'Esau's Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews', 1st Edition, Cambridge University Press: New York, pp. x-xxi
(4) For a detailed discussion of this please see: Avi Shlaim, 2010, 'Israel and Palestine: Reappraisals, Revisions, Refutations', 2nd Edition, Verso: New York and Ilan Pappe, 2011, 'The Forgotten Palestinians: A History of the Palestinians in Israel', 1st Edition, Yale University Press: New Haven


-------------------------------


This was originally published at the following address: http://semiticcontroversies.blogspot...i-semitic.html
__________________
 
Old October 5th, 2013 #2
Gordon Green
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,491
Default

But everyone 'sept one said Clancy was a tool of the elite Jews.
 
Old October 5th, 2013 #3
M.N. Dalvez
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,110
Default

Standard technique. Yawn. Next!
 
Old October 5th, 2013 #4
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Radl View Post
Was Tom Clancy anti-Semitic?


Ivry need but consider the fact that going to the gym for many jews is considered to be goyische; i.e. something non-jews do (or in other works un-jewish), to see that the jewish idea of masculinity is actually rather emasculating. When one understands that then it can be quickly appreciated that the jewish male is more 'Hebrew Hebbie-Jeebies' than 'Hebrew Hammer'.
The Jewish notion of masculinity consists of targeting a pregnant Palestinian's belly and claiming credit for a two-fer.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old October 5th, 2013 #5
Jim Harting
Senior Member
 
Jim Harting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,285
Default

There are two very different definitions of "anti-Semitism": the non-Jewish definition and the Jewish definition.

For non-Jews, anti-Semitism consists of hostility towards Jews.

For Jews, anti-Semitism means opposition to Jewish goals.

Thus, the Jews define anyone who opposes what they want as a functional anti-Semite, whether that person actually dislikes Jews or not.

By way of example, the Jews consider the NRA to be an anti-Semitic organization, not because it attacks Jews, but because it opposes the Jewish goal of disarming White Americans.

The opposite of an anti-Semite is a "righteous gentile." This is a non-Jew who enthusiastically embraces putting Jewish interests and Jewish welfare before all else, including their own safety and prosperity.

For, Jews, there really are only two categories of non-Jews: "anti-Semites" (those willing to say "no" to them on occasion) and "righteous goyim" (willing slaves).
__________________
NEW ORDER Website: http://theneworder.org
NEW ORDER on GAB: https://gab.ai/NEW_ORDER
NS Publications: http://nspublications.com
VNN National Socialist Union: https://vnnforum.com/group.php?groupid=58
 
Old October 6th, 2013 #6
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
There are two very different definitions of "anti-Semitism": the non-Jewish definition and the Jewish definition.

For non-Jews, anti-Semitism consistsFor, Jews, there really are only two categories of non-Jews: "anti-Semites" (those willing to say "no" to them on occasion) and "righteous goyim" (willing slaves).
A good distinction. The recent poll where only 9% of the American population supported an attack on Syria, an enemy of Israel, indicates that "anti-Semites" outnumber "righteous gentiles" these days. A very healthy trend.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old October 6th, 2013 #7
zoomcopter
Senior Member
 
zoomcopter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The goyim reservation
Posts: 5,944
Blog Entries: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Harting View Post
For Jews, anti-Semitism means opposition to Jewish goals.
Even if Jewish goals include the death and destruction of the non-Jew. The fate of Palestinians is linked directly to our own fate as we are one in the same in the eyes of world Jewry.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews.
 
Old October 30th, 2013 #8
WayneOfTheNorth
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 353
Default

I was playing Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell video game for ps3.

Now it is a great game, but I assure you Tom Clancy did not program this game. 100's of highly paid programmers did, and jews wrote every word of the dialogue. Tom Clancy had nothing to do with it.

There is a dyke bitch in charge, and Sam Fisher and his black boyfriend are always engaged in homo erotic flirting, but Sam never flirts in anyway with his gruff dyke boss.

At first I laughed when there was some sort of faggy dialogue between Sam Fisher and his black friend in the video game, then it happened again...and again.

Yes, that's right. Sam Fisher is a FUCKING FAGGOT!!

It's all about Iran and how evil terrorists want US troops to leave their country.

Everything in these video games is very realistic, the plots and the jews agendas.

And also, the high level super agents are probably faggots, too.
 
Old October 30th, 2013 #9
WayneOfTheNorth
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 353
Default

I just went through the fiction section of the library and looked at every author that had at least 7 or 8 books, they almost all had 'New York Times Best selling author" on the spine of the book. I picked out their New Y ork times best seller and read a few pages of each book, about 4 or 5 different authors, and everyone of them sounded like they were brainwashed by jews, or jews wrote every word of the book and these people are just playing along like they wrote it.

Just ask yourself white kind of assholes would play along in fooling the public pretending they write these books, when they know it's a bunch of jews?

Pedophiles, probably all of them are into 5 year old boys pissing or something.

Nearly every New York Times best selling author writes loads of shit about Nazis in their best selling book. So I know that these idiots aren't writing these books but a bunch of goddamn kikes are writing every word of their best sellers, then they get to write their other boring books, maybe.
 
Old October 30th, 2013 #10
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneOfTheNorth View Post
I just went through the fiction section of the library and looked at every author that had at least 7 or 8 books, they almost all had 'New York Times Best selling author" on the spine of the book. I picked out their New Y ork times best seller and read a few pages of each book, about 4 or 5 different authors, and everyone of them sounded like they were brainwashed by jews, or jews wrote every word of the book and these people are just playing along like they wrote it.

Just ask yourself white kind of assholes would play along in fooling the public pretending they write these books?
It's a C-O-N-spiracy. John Grisham's books are really written by a TI-84 graphing calculator--programmed by joos.
 
Reply

Tags
famous anti semite, tom clancy

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.
Page generated in 0.59669 seconds.