Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 9th, 2005 #21
Owain_Glyndwr
Crazed Lone Gunman
 
Owain_Glyndwr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 103
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by imadrifter

Dating's a bitch but it beats getting a cat.
At least my Cat isn't likely to run off with a nigger, my house, and the fruits of a decade of gut busting hard work

Took a while to realise it but it's not compulsory to be in a relationship
and from what I see around me these days I can honestly say I'm not
keen for whats on offer.

Theres a lot to be said for being single...
__________________
And in the Grove, by Gate and Hill, midst merry throng and market clatter stood the Hall of the Mountain Grill where table strain’d ‘neath loaded platter......

From the Legend of Beenzon Toaste.
 
Old November 9th, 2005 #22
abby_normal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owain_Glyndwr
At least my Cat isn't likely to run off with a nigger, my house, and the fruits of a decade of gut busting hard work

Took a while to realise it but it's not compulsory to be in a relationship
and from what I see around me these days I can honestly say I'm not
keen for whats on offer.

Theres a lot to be said for being single...

Yeah, but I hate being single. That and I would love to have a family of my own. Man just wasn't meant to be alone.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #23
Georgia Peach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pixi
Is your boyfriend racially aware? If not, I'd say you'd probably be better off cutting him loose and finding someone who shares your beliefs. I don't know how old you are, but I'd say that it's probably good advice for any age that there's no sense in wasting time with someone if you know your relationship will never go anywhere.
I thought he was. He talked the talk but I've noticed some things that contradict.

I say "nothing else" to do b/c there's a lot more.It's not like I'm leading him on or anything. We both know what's going on. Don't want you to think that I'm a walking horse's ass. It's just one of those things that if you're in it, you'd understand it.

But, back to dating.

I don't know if it's me or if this is normal. You find what you think to be a racially aware person but there's always something hidden. Some guys I've dated have done some odd things. They say they believe in racially purity and would never mix but you find out they are registered on dating sites to find Asian women, would fuck a Mexican but not date her, visit interracial porn sites. I mean, WTF? I'm not man bashing, I'm just wondering why this is. It's hard enough to find a good faithful person no matter if you're male or female.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #24
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
It's hard enough to find a good faithful person no matter if you're male or female.
No matter what, a white man with anything other than a white woman, in any capacity, is doing it because he's either too "weird", too poor, or too fed up to kwalify for the blessings of life and love with a neurotic, self-absorbed modern white woman. Mexicans don't bitch so much, Indonesians cost less, Asians aren't as psychotic, etc. Not condoning it, but there are reasons; on the other hand, it is also just perversion. But white men and women are both irreconcilably neurotic, by now. The white man is so beat down by jewry and female self-absorption that, when he does land a girlfriend, he becomes ludicrously "clingy" and so alienates the female, whereas the female is almost inhuman with indifference, contentiousness and other cruelties, from the start. It's clear that a very, very large segment of the white male population will never "maximize its sexual capacity", i.e. in marriage and reproduction. This is, sadly, a quite natural state (optimal breeding of the species), which is further exacerbated by cultural delimitation (taboos, etc.). It really has nothing to do with reproduction anymore, practically speaking. The best, or closest, males get the chicks. With females it's like that: they want optimal standard (for nesting and security) or what is nearest to hand (in a neurotic state). The stable center of white manhood gets nothin', or sloppy seconds, or rather sloppy two-hundredths. How many chicks do you know who've been with more than ten guys? In evolutionary terms this means the female has been "heavily marked", i.e. is not worth competing for, does not represent viable procreative material. Please, don't say men are "no better". Men are dotards; they will follow where you lead. By contrast, women are wild; they will do and think what you force them to and even, before long, become a little high-heeled commissariat for you, like any English thoroughbred. Anyway, the slutty dross we call "white girls" is verily choking our race out of existence, while we choke our chickens and wish someone would make a Dating Service Just 4 Us. Who cares? Just keep strokin': it won't get any better for us.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #25
Antiochus Epiphanes
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
 
Antiochus Epiphanes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
Default

lots of White girls settle down from their flightyness once married or having had a kid or two.

if you want a "down to Earth" White woman and dont like Americans, look into Russian girls, they come highly rated.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #26
Georgia Peach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Do you really believe anything that you just typed? Honestly.

**That was intended for upp**
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #27
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
Do you really believe anything that you just typed? Honestly.
Sorry. I guess I can just commiserate with you faggots about the dearth of viable white girl flesh, instead of trying to explain it.

Boo hoo

have problem

no racially aware chicas

OMG
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #28
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
if you want a "down to Earth" White woman and dont like Americans, look into Russian girls, they come highly rated.
I think you mean highly priced. Which is all right, women are a commodity and have always been essentially bought, but it's such a risk, and for what? A popsicle masquerading as a human being and speaking a downright ungodly tongue.

I think the BEST thing would be a Balkan chick. Don't cost as much, not as weird as Russians, etc.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #29
abby_normal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes
lots of White girls settle down from their flightyness once married or having had a kid or two.

if you want a "down to Earth" White woman and dont like Americans, look into Russian girls, they come highly rated.

Well...I've considered this but the cultural and language barriers would be a problem. That and it's really expensive (going over there to meet, ect.). I would rather meet a decent, intelligent, and preferably southern woman who was racially aware. I am and I don't look at interracial porn or speak out the side of my mouth about interracial dating either. My ex-wife used to get on to me and I would get into fights when I saw interracial dating/marriage when walking downtown or such. I find it terribly abhorent! But there is definitely something wrong with alot (not all) of american chicks. I think the feminism is what bugs me the most. Saying that, I don't really believe in a patriarichal society either (our ancesters weren't), but that doesn't mean that women should sprout dicks either and pretend they're men! We should recognize and celebrate the roles we where meant to be in, in a loving way. This crazy shit that passes for feminism is way too destructive for all the obvious reasons. I look to my parents as the "perfect" example: Dad was a doctor and made the living, mom raised us kids and kept a wonderful house. By the time dad walked in the door, dinner was ready and the house was in order. And dad worshipped mom; it was easy to see the love for her. He took her everywhere and really doted on her. It was his greatest joy to see the look in her eye when she opened the gift box and saw the jewelry he would have custom made for her (one of his patients and best friends was a fantastic jeweler). And I could see the love was reciprocated. It made for a great childhood.
Thats what I want. I'm not a doctor, but I was taught how to be a southern gentleman, and how to treat a lady. Unfortunately, how to be a real lady seems to be a lost art.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #30
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abby_normal
Saying that, I don't really believe in a patriarichal society either (our ancesters weren't),
So, what, women ruled in Aryan societies -- when, other than now? Do enlighten. Or did no one rule, like some Jew said? A big Celtic dance festival where no one ruled and perfect harmony reigned.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #31
abby_normal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uppinatta
So, what, women ruled in Aryan societies -- when, other than now? Do enlighten. Or did no one rule, like some Jew said? A big Celtic dance festival where no one ruled and perfect harmony reigned.
Well, if I remember my history correctly, the women where held in high esteem; in fact, most of the rune casters tended to be women (like a priestess, for example Freya Aswynn). It was more matriachrial"ish" if you will. I think the definitions don't really strictly apply as we think of them today. Everyone had a role to fill, men and women. It was more harmonious. Although only in terms of within the clan or tribe. There was quite a bit of intertribal fighting though, but usually due to population pressures (like between the celts, angles, saxons, viks, ect.). I guess what I meant earlier was that in a purely patriarchal society, men tend to forget the importance of the female (such as in the early Victorian society) and treat them as weak objects. When that happens, a backlash will eventually result; such as was seen during the counterculture revolution of the 60's. Another result of such distorted thinking is the pollution of the earth; the womb of the earth is just as important as the womb of the woman. Disregarding either is foolish and full of folly. Both male and female are important (sky father, earth mother). Men should listen to the wise counsel of the wife, wife should heed the direction of the husband.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #32
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abby_normal
Well, if I remember my history correctly, the women where held in high esteem;
Yes — ESTEEM. The word is arche, or RULE. In Rome, women were held de sui juris, which is to say, of legal credibility; they were the reason Romans subdued entire nations; yet for all that, they were not rulers, nor in Celtic society. Esteem does not equal rule, is what I'm getting at. Your view of this topic is, however, way too narrow; you jump from this beautiful little idea of matriarchal (read: rule by mother) Celtic society, to the "Victorian era", to the 60's, in less than a hundred words. Surely you realize how recklessly abbreviated your opinions are? how - uh - gay and free of any hard factual basis or logic? you know what we call "casters" in modern language, right? WITCHES. Is that rule, or is it superstition? and why is superstition your model?

This mischief in thinking is caused by new age crap ("earth is our womb!") and is the hippie residue of feminism. Somehow, like a force of nature, or by the cosmic law that every push has its push back, the "Victorian era", with its wanton, grisly, inhuman oppression of women (the like of which had never before been seen in history anywhere on Earth, our collective womb!), produced the hippie-Jew feminists of the "cultural revolution" here, way forward in mid-20th century rural NY. Yes, forget flappers -- forget Jewry -- forget everything but these two notions: "oppression" of women in the "Victorian era", and the girls-gone-wild 60's; put them together and you have a tidy little proof that any order imposed on a segment of the population naturally, inevitably produces bra-burnings and the like.

A totally girlie of way of looking at history and the universe, man.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #33
Georgia Peach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You like your women silent with a sandwich in their hand, eh?
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #34
abby_normal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
You like your women silent with a sandwich in their hand, eh?

whom are you refering too?
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #35
abby_normal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by uppinatta
Yes — ESTEEM. The word is arche, or RULE. In Rome, women were held de sui juris, which is to say, of legal credibility; they were the reason Romans subdued entire nations; yet for all that, they were not rulers, nor in Celtic society. Esteem does not equal rule, is what I'm getting at. Your view of this topic is, however, way too narrow; you jump from this beautiful little idea of matriarchal (read: rule by mother) Celtic society, to the "Victorian era", to the 60's, in less than a hundred words. Surely you realize how recklessly abbreviated your opinions are? how - uh - gay and free of any hard factual basis or logic? you know what we call "casters" in modern language, right? WITCHES. Is that rule, or is it superstition? and why is superstition your model?

This mischief in thinking is caused by new age crap ("earth is our womb!") and is the hippie residue of feminism. Somehow, like a force of nature, or by the cosmic law that every push has its push back, the "Victorian era", with its wanton, grisly, inhuman oppression of women (the like of which had never before been seen in history anywhere on Earth, our collective womb!), produced the hippie-Jew feminists of the "cultural revolution" here, way forward in mid-20th century rural NY. Yes, forget flappers -- forget Jewry -- forget everything but these two notions: "oppression" of women in the "Victorian era", and the girls-gone-wild 60's; put them together and you have a tidy little proof that any order imposed on a segment of the population naturally, inevitably produces bra-burnings and the like.

A totally girlie of way of looking at history and the universe, man.
Wow. I guess I really struck a nerve with you huh. No my thinking isn't narrow, it's broad because the topic has no one narrow simplistic answer! The sky father/earth mother concept is ancient. It's not new age. But you are right in that the 60's the jews perverted that concept into feminism as we know it today. Helrunar is not witchcraft. If you knew anything of the subject you wouldn't say that. And the reason I used it as an example is because in strictly patriarchal societies, women weren't allowed to "lead" in any spiritual sense. And lastly, "a girlie way of looking at history and the universe"? Please. I'm a grown man and I am mature enough to recognize that when women and men uplift each other, there will be harmony (at least between the sexes anyway). Everything I've said by the way, is from a Gnostic viewpoint.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #36
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by abby_normal
Everything I've said by the way, is from a Gnostic viewpoint.
No shit, dude.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #37
uppinatta
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
You like your women silent with a sandwich in their hand, eh?
Uh, why not.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #38
Pixi
resident psycho
 
Pixi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
You like your women silent with a sandwich in their hand, eh?
You forgot the beer.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #39
Bardamu
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,571
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pixi
And just what's wrong with kitties?
I like cats just fine, but women are a hell of a lot more interesting, and they clean their own box.
 
Old November 10th, 2005 #40
Pixi
resident psycho
 
Pixi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Georgia Peach
Do you really believe anything that you just typed? Honestly.

**That was intended for upp**
An important thing to realize when posting on VNN is to not take things like that personally. Men constantly have to watch what they say to avoid "offending" the feminists and fragile primadonnas in this country. On VNN, they actually have the freedom to say what they're thinking and feeling, without worrying about some psychotic dyke from NOW trying to come in to censor them. When you think about it, a lot of women in this country do fit uppinatta's description.

When you read something on here that seems to be anti-women, just reread it, and ask yourself if it's an accurate description of you or your behavior. If it isn't, then just let it go. Most men on here realize that the majority of women posting on VNN don't fit in the same category as the women they (rightfully) have issues with.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:33 AM.
Page generated in 0.79060 seconds.