|
April 13th, 2005 | #1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Pat Buchanan uses "Nazi" card like all the others.
Check out the recent Buchanan article and notice how when he's desperate to make a point he resorts to the same "Nazi" comparisons as the typical Liberals.
http://www.theamericancause.org/a-pjb-050323-nazi.htm Nazis: Pioneers in Medicine by Patrick J. Buchanan March 23, 2005 Ours is a nation where a judge may not sentence Beltway sniper Lee Malvo to death, because he is too young to die, but can sentence Terri Schiavo to death, because she is too severely handicapped to live. Schiavo continues the process of dying by starvation and dehydration, a method of capital punishment most would consider criminal if done to a pet. This was the method used at Auschwitz to murder Father Maximilian Kolbe, the priest who volunteered to take the place of a Polish father of a large family, who was one of 10 the camp commandant had selected for execution in reprisal for the escape of a prisoner. After being starved and dehydrated for days, Kolbe was injected by his Nazi captors with carbolic acid. He died a martyr's death, said the church that canonized him. That is what would have happened to Terri. Only she would have been denied the lethal injection by those watching her die. That there arose a national outcry at the execution of Schiavo – so loud Congress and President Bush heard it and came to the rescue – is a sign America is not morally dead ... yet. But a culture of death has taken deep root in America's soul. One wonders if our young, so many of them cheated of a knowledge of history in schools they are forced to attend, are aware of how closely our elites approximate, in belief and argument, the elites of Weimar and Nazi Germany in the 1920s and 1930s. In 1920, Dr. Alfred Hoche, professor of psychiatry at the University of Freiburg, and Karl Binding, a law professor at Leipzig, authored "The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life." They urged a national policy of assisted suicide for those "empty shells of human beings" – the terminally ill and mentally retarded, and those with brain damage and psychiatric conditions. In October 1933, The New York Times quoted the Nazi minister of justice as saying that ridding Germany of such poor creatures would make it "possible for physicians to end the tortures of incurable patients, upon requests, in the interests of true humanity." "If we desire a certain type of civilization," said George Bernard Shaw, "we must exterminate the sort of people who do not fit in." In researching "The Death of the West," I discovered that the first episode of publicized "legal" killing of an innocent was the case of "Baby Knauer." The father of the little boy, who was blind, retarded and missing an arm and a leg, appealed to the Fuhrer for permission to have his son put to death. Hitler referred the matter to his physician, Karl Brandt. In 1938, permission was granted. When war came in 1939, a program code-named "Aktion 4" went about systematically eliminating all "life unworthy of life" in the Reich. By 1940, scores of thousands had been put to death. Then, Bishop Clemens von Galen took to the pulpit of Munster Cathedral to damn Hitler's regime for "plain murder" and direct German Catholics to "withdraw ourselves and our faithful from their (Nazi) influence so that we may not be contaminated by their thinking and their ungodly behavior." "Aktion 4" went underground. One of its graduates, Franz Stangl, would turn up two years later as commandant of Treblinka. After the war, the German doctors who had carried out Hitler's orders in violation of the Hippocratic Oath were judged guilty of "crimes against humanity." The Dutch doctors who refused to cooperate in the Nazi program of eliminating "life unworthy of life" during the occupation of Holland were placed among the moral heroes of an immoral era. Ironically, as the protest to save Schiavo built up steam over the weekend, The New York Times in its "Saturday Profile" warmly featured another Dutch doctor. Dr. Eduard Verhagen has, said the Times, become famous in Europe for having "presided over the medically induced deaths of four extraordinarily ill newborns." "For his efforts to end what he calls unbearable and incurable suffering," wrote reporter Gregory Crouch, "Dr. Verhagen has been called Dr. Death, a second Hitler and worse – mostly by American opponents of euthanasia." Verhagen describes himself as a bearer of peace and happiness to children. When these suffering little ones die, he says, "the child goes to sleep. ... It's beautiful in a way. ... They're children who are severely ill and in great pain. It is after they die that you see them relaxed for the first time. You see their faces in a way they should be for the first time." Franz Stangl could not have put it better. Hitler's doctors may prove to have been the medical pioneers of 21st century. © 2005 Creators Syndicate, Inc. |
April 14th, 2005 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
|
He uses Nazis but he doesn't use the word jews. This is good. Unless any of the names mentioned were, in fact, jews, or "of jewish (puke) descent", in which case it should be noted as an historically interesting footnote.
If the Nazis did these things, how can you complain? Neo Nazis should be proud of it, I suppose. |
April 16th, 2005 | #3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ive read his book, Death of the West, and it was a bit rediculous. He defends the very same people who are the driving force behind whats threatening the West. The brains atleast.
The question is, is he sugar coating what he really feels or does he really think what he says? Obviously, he wouldnt have a career if he didnt sugarcoat his words and even then he is considered "racist" by lemmings. |
April 19th, 2005 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Goy Wonder
Posts: 1,327
|
Buchanan is a darkhole
About 10 years ago or so, I used to think PB was a White Man's voice. Now, not anymore. PB is flat out scared shitless to do anything but run around in catholic circles pretending to champion traditional American values. Bullshit!
a combo of a fraud and a catholic pussy. PB makes a damn good living on teevee, writing a few articles and publishing a few books, which are decent for the masses of Whites as first step material. Death of the West was halfway controversial but never lighted the fire across the lemming white world because most whites don't give a fuck anymore. sad but all too true. Buchanan is mostly a catholic bullliever with a little paleocon mixed in for good measure. a white man's darkhole. does he know the problem and its causes? of course. he is a fraud, controlled by the big media jews just because he wants to make a few million and live the good life. I'd say he avoids race and it's importance in our world because he's a businessman. |
April 19th, 2005 | #5 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Agreed. I think many Catholics see him a puss too.
As Alex has shown well in five years, people want a voice that speaks for them with guts and uncompromisingly, without all the simpering. Patsy Buch played that role for a time, but always shies away from throwing the hardest punches. What kind of fighter pulls his best punches? A loser, that's who. We must keep on building on these foundations to show Whites that there are leaders available who will speak for their interests without all the bullshit apologizing. As soon as I see a socalled "leader" apologize I want to vomit. When it comes to nazis, they fought the Jews successfully for a time, but lost the war. That is why they can be demonized. Jews won the war, which is why they are on top. What we need to do is quit playing our fiddles to the tune called by the Jew and dance to our own music. |
May 1st, 2005 | #6 |
Administrator
|
Buchanan's like the fresh pope: opposed to all modernism but the revised Catholic-Jewish relationship. That tells me what I need to know. "It was all a game, a way of making a living," as Sobran said of professional conservatism. When you start with the premise that men come back from the dead, little contradictions like being against wet floors and for running taps are easily ignored. That's where the faith part kicks in. Buchanan within two months of his death will have written a column proving the Catholic church did everything it could to save the jews in WWII. He's not one of us.
Last edited by Alex Linder; May 1st, 2005 at 10:03 PM. |
May 2nd, 2005 | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
|
Well said, Alex and AE. I couldn't agree more.
And it's why I've always admired, respected, and supported David Duke. No matter his minor flaws, he's always NAMED and EXPOSED the jews. And quite persuasively, effectively, proficiently, and widely I'll add.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire |
May 2nd, 2005 | #8 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Rounder,
Duke showed in the 92 Republicunt primaries-- that a good looking White guy who tells the truth on race would get more primary votes than a faker like Buch. That's worth remembering. Buchanan, staked out elements of Duke's position since then, since he wasnt in the sights of Jewry. But anytime he strayed too far, they yanked his leash and he tucked tail and hid out for a while, or did something stupid like pick a Negress for a running mate. Buchanan is fake opposition. |
May 5th, 2005 | #9 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
May 12th, 2005 | #10 | |
Genetically Wealthy
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 623
|
Quote:
This week he is in the headlines over his quite enjoyable essay questioning WW2 intervention, one that induced a jew to squeal even though jews aren't mentioned one single time. Doesn't he know better? You don't NOT mention the jews when talking about WW2. WWII comments blasted BY ANDREW METZ STAFF WRITER May 12, 2005 Was World War II worth it? In the inflammatory world view of Pat Buchanan, the short answer is no. The war that stopped the Nazis' global campaign and the mechanistic extermination of European Jewry was actually not worth the effort. The commentator yesterday offered equally provocative answers to other questions: Why destroy Hitler? And why venerate FDR and Churchill? On the radio and Internet, Buchanan framed his positions as amplification of remarks made over the weekend by President George W. Bush that the pact ending the war brought on a Stalinist domination that was "one of the greatest wrongs of history." But Buchanan's comments on the Don Imus radio show and in an essay posted on the Web site of his organization, The American Cause, went much further. He suggested that because Germans voted Hitler in, they did not need to be liberated, and that Britain and France drew Germany into the wider conflict. He did not mention Jews or the Holocaust - the most outrageous omission for Yaffa Eliach, a Holocaust expert and survivor. "For me it is very important to present the truth, to show the murder," Eliach said. "The idea was to kill Jews." Abraham Foxman, president of the Anti-Defamation League, called Buchanan's comments "immoral" and "bordering on Holocaust denial. "But, you know, he has been there before," Foxman said. "Pat Buchanan in the past has challenged whether or not there were crematoria." Veterans were also insulted. "That is more or less saying they fought for the wrong reasons and the sacrifice was futile," said Veterans of Foreign Wars spokesman Jerry Newberry. "Buchanan apparently hasn't given much thought to what the world would have looked like if Hitler and his henchmen would have succeeded." Buchanan did not return calls yesterday. Former Mayor Ed Koch offered this blunt rebuttal: "I believe that no decent human being should ever sit down at the same table with Pat Buchanan and I am shocked that otherwise responsible, respectable citizens share platforms with him on Sunday shows." Copyright 2005 Newsday Inc.
__________________
". . . the Jews are irreligious, atheistic, immoral bunch of bastards." "...generally speaking, you can't trust the bastards. They turn on us."- Richard Nixon black African Americans Asian Hispanic Black Katrina Blacks African-American Jew Negro Bush Negroes |
|
May 13th, 2005 | #11 | |||||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Good for Buchanan. But as valuable as his words are, confronting the Holofraud directly would get to the root of the problem. By refraining from doing so, he allows the jews the upper hand. "Buchanan refuses to participate in our group hallucination, making him the evilest of men." What Holocaust? It never happened. It's a Big Lie. Quote:
Just as you receive the treatment your behavior and attitude show you'll tolerate, you receive the quality of newspaper editorial your dollars and responses show you'll tolerate. If you subsidize Buchanan with your praise, time, and money, you will get more Buchanans. But Pat's been part of the System since Nixon, and all I see in that period is Whites going backwards. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||||
May 14th, 2005 | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
|
Did Hitler's forces kill three million Polish Catholics?
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|