|
March 27th, 2009 | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
|
March 27th, 2009 | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Florida CSA
Posts: 1,904
|
Quote:
Also, please explain the "low Protestant mindset that is the milieu from which WN springs". As opposed to what, exactly? If you intended to follow your own advice, you wouldn't have posted this crap. You'd have taken the high road that you recommend to others. Perhaps it's your culture, not to? |
|
March 28th, 2009 | #23 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
There is no mystery about segregation. Apart is apart full-stop.
__________________
This bus is "Whites only". Your bus will be along in 3-4 hours. The number one enemy of the white race is the jew. Number two is rabbi john jewtree. His concubines included. |
|
March 28th, 2009 | #24 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
No, I mean what I said - the low, scummy behavior too many WN exhibit is more typical of the South than the North. Think Baptists. They in particular are likelier to be stupid and hypocritical. Think Jimmy Swaggart, Ted Haggard. I don't know if they're Baptists, but they're on that level. These are people saying one thing and doing another. If they ever split with their buddies, they resort immediately to ANY character smear they think will stick, facts be damned. As I say in a different post, read "Don't Call Me Brother." This deals with pentecostals, Church of Christ in specific. It shows you just how SLEAZY the leadership of these people are. Low-end Christianity is not an impressive thing. The leaders are corrupt, and the lay people are too stupid to see it. A direct parallel can be drawn between the poor southern christians Austin Miles describes and the ranks of NA/SF. The North has plenty of problems too but they tend to take a different from. The North's problems come less from stupidity and corruption than the South's do, and more from self-righteousness and moral crusading - the sanctimonious madmen I've expended much air describing and warning about. If you don't think there's a huge difference between a north shore Episcopalian liberal and a back-country Alabama Baptist, well, I assure you there is. White nationalist ranks tend to be drawn from the South for historical reasons. It's not surprising that the defects their leaders display are the same as those found in the South. It is very much a low, Protestant, Southern thing to protect corrupt leadership by refusing to allow any criticism of a leader. That is how NA and SF both have always operated. It doesn't work. My guess is that no movement or cause led by people at the cultural level of Baptists will ever break free from the insane liberals because they simply don't have the intelligence. The vast majority of them will continue to be abused and mocked because they simply lack the brains to figure out what is going on. |
|
March 28th, 2009 | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 280
|
Case Hardening as a Model for WN
We need to dealienate our people from each other. Just as the Marxist analysis of "class" must be discarded in favor of "race" as the category that matters, we must get rid of the separation into groups where high-IQ or low-IQ whites are unwelcome. End "jocks vs geeks".
|
March 28th, 2009 | #26 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
March 30th, 2009 | #27 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
March 31st, 2009 | #28 | ||||
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,544
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
'We live in a world defined by the jewish media' - Geoff Beck, TTIND. 'Gentiles are supernal garbage' - Rabbi Schneur Zalman, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch. |
||||
March 31st, 2009 | #29 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 171
|
Quote:
There is a so-called WN named Don Black, who does lie, who has been the first to cast lying slander in any argument. That person, Don Black, needs to be exposed for what he has done, slandering WN, over the years. The flag of Stormfront must fall. Another WN nation will take over. Don Black has always been the first to lie, the first to defame. That person has to be shunned from all White community. We have to stand up and defend White honor and the principles of truth. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #30 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 250
|
Quote:
Honor and truth are non-existent at board level at SF. Everyone knows that. It's no secret.
__________________
This bus is "Whites only". Your bus will be along in 3-4 hours. The number one enemy of the white race is the jew. Number two is rabbi john jewtree. His concubines included. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #31 | |||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
"Well yeah, I them, your honour, but I know for a fact that some other dude killed 3 times as many people!"
And I'm not a Jew anyway. Stop this nonsense. Quote:
Quote:
Race membership is decided by luck. Class membership is decided by relevant factors (e.g., wealth). Therefore, judgements based on race will be, on average, less accurate than judgements based on class. Personally I doubt there'd be more than one or two people who would be in a position to use either sort of judgement. Quote:
|
|||
April 1st, 2009 | #32 | |
Guest
|
Quote:
Last edited by fdtwainth; April 2nd, 2009 at 05:19 AM. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,544
|
Racial differences eg. the genetic advantages that Whites have over other races. You seem to want us to forget about or forego those and fixate on class (war).
__________________
'We live in a world defined by the jewish media' - Geoff Beck, TTIND. 'Gentiles are supernal garbage' - Rabbi Schneur Zalman, founder of Chabad-Lubavitch. |
April 1st, 2009 | #35 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Relax.
I was being serious. You lot constantly use generalisations to do harm. Judging individuals by misunderstood statistics, seemingly just so you have an excuse for being wankers. Quote:
And as I said, I wouldn't use either unless I were making policy or something. |
|
April 1st, 2009 | #36 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Whites don't like blacks, don't want to live around them. I prefer a politics that protects their freedom to live and develop separately. If you, like other liberals, actually believed your own bs about race not being real, you would support free association rather than criminalize it. |
||
April 1st, 2009 | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
Judge bases on class? What? What are we judging? If it's competency then Whites in all classes are more competent than any other race in the same "class" and in fact "lower" class Whites would be better at it. Case in point - our latest flux of "highly educated" nogs and wogs.
If you want to say people are equal within a "class" then well that's laughable and easily disprovable, so if people aren't equal in a class then class doesn't suggest a "class" at all (Since class suggests an approximately equal proficiency with some exceptions that aren't meaningful to the mean) but rather a social construct that in fact doesn't exist. Meaning that it all breaks down to simply race so essentially the only argument that would make your argument hold together is to say that Whites and other people within a class are equally capable and that simply isn't true. Thus class is no longer a descriptor and thus not a way of "judging" anyone. Last edited by psychologicalshock; April 1st, 2009 at 07:07 PM. |
April 2nd, 2009 | #38 | ||||
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
April 2nd, 2009 | #39 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
if you know that black males are disrpoportionately resposnsible for violent crimes, such as muggings, or rapes against white women, which they provably and statistically most certainly are-- then if you are a white woman walking down the street at night and a coon is following you, then you SHOULD indeed you MUST assume based on his GROUP that he presents a serious potential threat. Reaching inside the purse to ready the revolver is a rational response based on "PREJUDICE" which is not blind but clear sighted and based on facts. Social groups such as race or ethnic-tribal belonging-- Jewishness for example-- when you know the group, it tells you something probably about the individual, in certain contexts. THe information is useful. We should want to know it, and we should use the information whenever its useful to us. Just like marketers who spend billions of dollars a year studying group demographics including age, sex, religion, neighborhood, geographic, class, income, edcuational level, blah blah blah, a thousand group belongings, do this and spend tons of money on it because it is useful. |
|
April 2nd, 2009 | #40 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
YET: the purpose of the thread topic as I see it, is not to justify the rational use of social groupings, such as race, but to point out that just because someone agrees with us that race may be used for rational and constructive purposes, and just beause that person is our own race, doesnt mean that person is a good person with ethics we would approve of or desire to associate ourselves with.
There is nothing contradictory between observing group tendencies, and being able to take this or that individual as an exception to the group tendency, in some important way. Larry, now you can go back to your mikvah, or doing your metzizah b'peh, or making matzohs or whatever it is that all do this time of year. |
Tags |
jewed thread |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|