Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 24th, 2018 #1221
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Christians use similar "muh feelings" arguments as the cultural marxists do to justify their positions. It's just another example of both being 2 peas from the same jew-pod. I feel like gawd exists, so he must. I feel like all races are equal, so they must be.
Not quite, there is plenty of tangible evidence that equality is a lie. I obviously can't prove God exists but you can't prove otherwise either.

Even the cultural-Marxists know that nigger countries are shitholes, which is why they got so offended over Trump's comments. Per the cultural-Marxism "religion," you are not supposed to speak of self-evident truths because it is "offensive."


Cultural-Marxism tells us to go against natural feelings while Christianity is a natural feeling.

Last edited by Man of the road; January 25th, 2018 at 05:05 PM.
 
Old January 24th, 2018 #1222
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
Cultural-Marxism tells us to go against natural feelings while Christianity is a natural feeling.
Christianity demands belief in jewish fairy tales, without any evidence, and so does Cultural Marxism.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old January 24th, 2018 #1223
Scaramantula
Zen Fascist
 
Scaramantula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Val Verde
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
while Christianity is a natural feeling.
If it's so natural, why did it have to be brutally enforced for centuries, and why did it start to decline once the threat of punishment was removed?
__________________
Women have spent the last 100 years proving men have been right about them for the past 100,000 years.
 
Old January 24th, 2018 #1224
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Christianity demands belief in jewish fairy tales, without any evidence, and so does Cultural Marxism.
There is evidence of Christ's existence, not only the existence but that there was something supernatural regarding Him; that's why jews labeled Him a "sorcerer."
Moslems too acknowledge Christ as a high prophet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scaramantula View Post
If it's so natural, why did it have to be brutally enforced for centuries, and why did it start to decline once the threat of punishment was removed?
Most people back then were believers and only the most extreme cases of blasphemy and/or heresy were punished by death. If the Church still ruled our motherland you think these hordes of lawless invaders would be running around doing as they please?


The Church's power started to decline because of (((Freemasonry))) Just like they demolished European monarchies. The Freemasonic motto is "fight tyranny everywhere, even in the home." It's not far from the satanic mantra of, "do what thou wilt."

Linder basically said that everything that's bad for the jew is good for us. I'd like to touch two points: Jews had Christ killed, the Roman authorities even offered to free Him for they found no wrongdoing but (((they))) insisted on his execution.

The Jews freely admit they were at war with the Roman Church. It's easy to think in the - "Christ was a jew so I reject Christianity" - dichotomy. However, this goes way deeper than that. Go ahead and challenge yourself by trying to do research on Freemasonry, you'll find there is very little out there. If you do come across something, it's usually been "corrected" by them. They are everywhere and very apt at doing info-leak and damage control.
 
Old January 24th, 2018 #1225
Longbaugh
Senior Member
 
Longbaugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 849
Default

Quote:


There is evidence of Christ's existence,



No, there isn't. There is absolutely no evidence contemporary to the time of Jesus's alleged existence that he did, actually, exist. None. We have not one, single, word written about him from anyone who was alive when he was allegedly alive. Not a one.



Quote:


It's easy to think in the - "Christ was a jew so I reject Christianity" - dichotomy. However, this goes way deeper than that.

No, it doesn't. It goes no deeper that.
__________________
Free Palestine.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1226
Erik T. White
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: The Deep South of the USSA
Posts: 4,813
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
There is evidence of Christ's existence,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Longbaugh View Post
No, there isn't. There is absolutely no evidence contemporary to the time of Jesus's alleged existence that he did, actually, exist. None. We have not one, single, word written about him from anyone who was alive when he was allegedly alive. Not a one.
Quote:
The oldest written fragments of the Iliad that survive date from centuries after we think the poem was first committed to writing, and the oldest surviving complete copy is the fabulous Venetus difficult to know what moment if any it reflects.
http://dhayton.haverford.edu/blog/20...ts-date-homer/A, which dates from nearly 1800 years later. Therefore, on the basis of the written text alone it is

There is also the question of whether Homer even existed as a single person.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeric_Question

One argument was there was no evidence of Pontius Pilate. This has been proven false by archeology:



Tacitus records the name Pontius Pilate in his "Annals of Imperial Rome," and states a figure "who called himself the Christ" was executed by Pilate. I took classical culture as one of my humanities required courses, and out professor stated Tacitus had to be correct and please the Emperor or Tacitus himself would be killed.

14/88

Erik
__________________
Whites are afraid to speak out against their enemies, let alone act out. This must change ~ Alex Linder
Sweat saves blood, blood saves lives, but brains saves both. ~ Erwin Rommel

Last edited by Erik T. White; January 25th, 2018 at 01:51 AM. Reason: more info
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1227
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
There is evidence of Christ's existence, not only the existence but that there was something supernatural regarding Him; that's why jews labeled Him a "sorcerer."

Moslems too acknowledge Christ as a high prophet.
So you believe jeboo was "supernatural" just because kikes in ancient times called him a sorcerer, and muslims recognize him as a prophet? You really are a sucker for semitism. You seem to give so much credence to a non-White religion that originates from a desert shit hill, and quote non-Whites in ancient times, and their equally cooky religions, as evidence for your claims. And you basically admitted that what I said above was 100% correct, when you quoted jews as calling jeboo a "sorcerer" as evidence that he was supernatural. You're a sucker for fairy tales, as long as it feels right. That's the same mindset of a snowflake leftist.

I don't believe ancient man is a good judge of "supernatural", considering anyone with parlor tricks could have been called a wizard, magician, or a sorcerer. Ancient man used to point to thunder as evidence for god/s. But now we have scientific explanations, knowledge obtained by learning and studying our environment. The kinda knowledge that was deemed heretical by your Catholic Church for over 1000 years.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; January 25th, 2018 at 07:13 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1228
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Default

I like how you won't address how jews killed Christ, showing that they didn't exactly like Him. Or the fact the jews were historically against the Church. Instead you'd rather take personal jabs at me. What's bad for the kikes is good for us, right? Linder said you're either on team White or team Jew, the jew was historically an enemy of the Church. If you are against the Church too, it's obvious you're on team rabbi.

Last edited by Man of the road; January 25th, 2018 at 08:04 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1229
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
Go ahead and challenge yourself by trying to do research on Freemasonry, you'll find there is very little out there. If you do come across something, it's usually been "corrected" by them. They are everywhere and very apt at doing info-leak and damage control.
Nobody here subscribes to Freemasonry. I don't know why you keep bringing it up in this topic, but I think mostly everyone here regards it as an anti-White organization, right along with your Catholic Church.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1230
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
I like how you won't address how jews killed Christ, showing that they didn't exactly like Him. Or the fact the jews were historically against the Church.
So just because jews are against something, we should support it? The difference between me and you, is that I don't let jews tell me how to think. In more ways than just being gullible to jewish fairy tale books.

Maybe jeboo did exist, as a flesh and blood person. Who might have worked a few parlor tricks for "man of the roads" in ancient times. Like getting someone to fake being blind, then *curing* them. Or putting some planks on the water and walking on them, to make it look like he's walking on water from a distance. Someone exhumes his supposed tomb = jeboo resurrected. You gotta really go out on a limb to seriously believe all this garbage. You're more than just a sucker, but a witless dupe. Just because lots of other people believe it doesn't mean anything. It's more about people just not wanting to challenge the way they were born and raised. The White race doesn't need any of this. There is nothing beneficial that your christ cult provides to White society that couldn't be provided by a healthier medium.



Quote:
Instead you'd rather take personal jabs at me. What's bad for the kikes is good for us, right? Linder said you're either on team White or team Jew, the jew was historically an enemy of the Church. If are against the Church too, it's obvious you're on team rabbi.
I have no problem stating what my views are, and nothing I believe requires subscribing to fairy tales of any sort. Jewish in nature, or otherwise.

I support the idea that if we don't exterminate the jews, they will exterminate us. So this is counter-extermination. Is that "team rabbi" enough for you, christian?

We need to support Racial Nationalism in every White country. That could be in the form of Ethnic Nationalism, National Socialism, or some variation of Fascism. Democracy is for the birds.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; January 25th, 2018 at 07:46 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1231
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik T. White View Post
Tacitus records the name Pontius Pilate in his "Annals of Imperial Rome," and states a figure "who called himself the Christ" was executed by Pilate.
I'm sure Pilate executed *lots* of jews, and how common of a name was "Christ" during those times? It could have been as common of a surname in ancient Israel as "Jones" is in the USA, for all we know. This isn't a question of whether there were plenty of kikes in ancient Israel named "Christ", but did the bibli-cool (it's a cool historical fiction) Christ, actually exist?

Using the comparison here between "Christ" and "Homer" isn't valid. As far as I know, Homer didn't work any "miracles". He simply wrote and told stories. Even though some people may have believed those stories to be truth, and not fiction. Many of the claims made by the buy-bull are just as erroneous as the ones made in Homer's epics. One is quickly regarded as fiction, but the other is regarded as fact, if for no other reason than people are intellectually dishonest, and refuge to challenge ridiculous claims, just because people are set in their ways.

I firmly 100% believe, that the White race will never see it's true potential, as long as we're carrying around semitic baggage from 2000 years ago. It's time people wake up, in more ways than simply becoming racially aware.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1232
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Nobody here subscribes to Freemasonry. I don't know why you keep bringing it up in this topic, but I think mostly everyone here regards it as an anti-White organization, right along with your Catholic Church.
That's precisely why I keep bringing it up. To show that the Vatican I was much more anti-jew than it was anti-White. You don't know, or at least refuse to acknowledge, the historic polarity between jewry in Europe and The Church.

I completely agree that every single White country needs racial nationalism. I also find absolutely nothing contradictory in being a National Socialist and a Vatican I Catholic.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1233
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
I completely agree that every single White country needs racial nationalism. I also find absolutely nothing contradictory in being a National Socialist and a Vatican I Catholic.
The Vatican I church was anti-White, as me and others have shown in this topic. But you can choose to continue believing whatever makes you feel good. Because feeling good is more important than the facts, anyway, right?

National Socialism advocates a clear separation between Church and State. Meaning that Churches are to refrain from engaging in politics. It was decreed as such by Hitler and other members of the NSDAP. That's one of the core tenants of National Socialism. Christian priests were sent to camps right alongside jews and faggots for not heeding these demands. So you're OK with this?

Here is what Himmler had to say with regards to christianity:

Quote:
"We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves. Today at Heydrich's funeral I intentionally expressed in my oration from my deepest conviction a belief in God, a belief in fate, in the ancient one as I called him - that is the old Germanic word: Wralda.

We shall once again have to find a new scale of values for our people: the scale of the macrocosm and the microcosm, the starry sky above us and the world in us, the world that we see in the microscope. The essence of these megalomaniacs, these Christians who talk of men ruling this world, must stop and be put back in its proper proportion. Man is nothing special at all. He is an insignificant part of this earth. If a big thunderstorm comes, he can do nothing about it. He cannot even predict it. He has no idea how a fly is constructed - however unpleasant, it is a miracle - or how a blossom is constructed. He must once again look with deep reverence into this world. Then he will acquire the right sense of proportion about what is above us, about how we are woven into this cycle.

Then, on a different plane, something else must happen: we must once again be rooted in our ancestors and grandchildren, in this eternal chain and eternal sequence. By rooting our people in a deep ideological awareness of ancestors and grandchildren we must once more persuade them that they must have sons. We can do a very great deal. But everything that we do must be justifiable vis-ŕ-vis the clan, our ancestors. If we do not secure this moral foundation which is the deepest and best because the most natural, we will not be able to overcome Christianity on this plane and create the Germanic Reich which will be a blessing for the earth. That is our mission as a nation on this earth. For thousands of years it has been the mission of this blond race to rule the earth and again and again to bring it happiness and culture."

Speech to top leaders of the SS, June 9, 1942 Berlin

Source: Nazism; A History In Documents And Eyewitness Accounts, 1919 - 1945 by J. Noakes and G. Pridham
Schocken Books Inc, New York, First American Edition 1990, Page 498
And with regards to what's in bold, science has shed some light on these matters since Himmler's time. We have a pretty damn good idea how a fly and a blossom are constructed, and we can even predict thunderstorms as well as do something about it, such as take proper shelter, and build structures that can survive them. And we even know that 'controlling' weather is theoretically possible, although currently outside of our capabilities. But it won't be forever.

Also, Himmler would not have made such a bold stance against christianity, if Hitler didn't also agree. I believe the policy of the NSDAP was to eventually phase out christianity, slowly, from German life. They wanted to handle the matter with kid gloves, and not rock the boat too much. Programs such as "Positive Christianity" give credence to this being their actual position. I think it gives some legitimacy to "Hitler's table talk", where Hitler appears to be on the same page as Himmler with regards to christianity (in private), even though he's a Catholic:

https://www.davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html

I'd support a National policy designed to slowly phase out christianity from our society, and replace it with healthy, core, Nationalist, and Racial ideology. Instead, let's elevate ourselves to the fullest potential, and we can do that with policies designed for the best to flourish. Religion? Maybe, if by religion you mean "way of life". A religion doesn't have to mean a belief in jewish fairy tales, and one can still have a belief that there is *probably* a creator of the universe without subscribing to generic, semetic fairy tales that just dumb us down as a people.

I stated being an atheist previously, but the difference between atheist and agnostic are often blurred. I'm open to the possibility of the existence of higher beings, that we might define as 'gods'. But I most definitely do not believe in the christian interpretation of this. The existence of your god, specifically, as defined by the buy-bull, I deny. I deny that your Jesus (pronounced like spics do, etc hey-sus), if he ever existed, was anything other than a trickster who commanded a coterie of gullible idiots. And stirred up enough of a fuss to get executed. Claiming to be the "King of the Jews" probably didn't help matters any. Claiming to be King, when you're not, would have gotten you executed in quite a few countries in the ancient world.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; January 25th, 2018 at 09:36 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1234
Emily Henderson
Intellijintly Dezined
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erik T. White View Post
http://dhayton.haverford.edu/blog/20...ts-date-homer/A, which dates from nearly 1800 years later. Therefore, on the basis of the written text alone it is

There is also the question of whether Homer even existed as a single person.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homeric_Question

One argument was there was no evidence of Pontius Pilate. This has been proven false by archeology:



Tacitus records the name Pontius Pilate in his "Annals of Imperial Rome," and states a figure "who called himself the Christ" was executed by Pilate. I took classical culture as one of my humanities required courses, and out professor stated Tacitus had to be correct and please the Emperor or Tacitus himself would be killed.

14/88

Erik
TY for presenting tangible material for discussion, Erik.

None of the Mythicists re Yeshua argue that Pilate is not a historical figure--in fact, it further proves their point re Yeshua.

Re Pilate: we have a partial narrative from his contemporary Philo. We have a narrative one generation later from Josephus. For Pilate, we evidence in the form of an inscription commissioned by him.

If we had one for Jebus, the debate over his tangible existence would be over right there, but we don’t.

We have another Jew, Philo, who lived in a nearby province through the tenure of Pilate, writing about him. He wrote an entire book about him.

We have neither for Jesus. No discussion of historical event from a contemporary (Gospels were written long after, written referring to Jesus as a figure they never knew in the original.)
We have nothing in Philo’s writing referring to Jesus, either.

Multiple historians discuss Pilate: Philo, Justus, Tacitus, Josephus. Nothing regarding Jesus. For Jesus we have the Gospels, which even Christian Apologist Ehrman, being a scholar to a certain degree, admits are highly mythological—this is why you can’t corroborate the Gospels by citing persons using the Gospels themselves.

The earliest sources refer to Jesus as a a celestial savior god and say nothing—IN THEIR ORIGINAL- about his ever being on earth or ever known to anyone by any means other than scripture and revelation.

Not true of Herod, not true of Pilate. We have much tangible proof of their historical existence.

We have detailed references to Pilate within forty years of his life by Josephus, something we do not have for Jesus---there are two references to Jesus in Josephus’ writing, but are DECADES later add-ons. Written after the Gospels were published. Neither are detailed.

As the Mythicists have shown, we have better evidence for Pilate than we have for Jesus, as we should have similar for Jesus (real name Yeshua) were he such.

And for the sake of the argument, if Yeshua really lived and was killed, he was killed by the Romans when his fellow Jews brought him before them, and said to kill him. Why? He was a blaspheming Jew, who lied about being their King. According to the gospel accounts, Jewish authorities in Roman Judea charged Yeshua with blasphemy, and asked for his execution.

(((They))) lacked the authority to execute Yeshua (John 18:31). They brought him to the Roman Governor of the province, Pontius Pilate, and claimed he was a threat to Ceasar, the Roman King.

Romans had the power to say no. And that's if one believes it is not a Euhemerized myth.
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier

Last edited by Emily Henderson; January 25th, 2018 at 10:08 AM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1235
Scaramantula
Zen Fascist
 
Scaramantula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Val Verde
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
If the Church still ruled our motherland you think these hordes of lawless invaders would be running around doing as they please?
Yes, because they're fellow Christians.

Quote:
Tacitus records
Taticus wasn't even born when the Rabbi Joshua was supposedly killed.

There's as much evidence Jesus existed as there is for King Arthur being a real person.

ZERO
__________________
Women have spent the last 100 years proving men have been right about them for the past 100,000 years.

Last edited by Scaramantula; January 25th, 2018 at 06:37 PM.
 
Old January 25th, 2018 #1236
Man of the road
Senior Member
 
Man of the road's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
So just because jews are against something, we should support it? The difference between me and you, is that I don't let jews tell me how to think. In more ways than just being gullible to jewish fairy tale books.
Not necessarily, but I can't think of even one thing that the jews were vehemently against which was bad for us.

Quote:
Maybe jeboo did exist, as a flesh and blood person. Who might have worked a few parlor tricks for "man of the roads" in ancient times. Like getting someone to fake being blind, then *curing* them. Or putting some planks on the water and walking on them, to make it look like he's walking on water from a distance. Someone exhumes his supposed tomb = jeboo resurrected. You gotta really go out on a limb to seriously believe all this garbage. You're more than just a sucker, but a witless dupe. Just because lots of other people believe it doesn't mean anything. It's more about people just not wanting to challenge the way they were born and raised.
That's your belief that those things didn't happen.

Quote:
The White race doesn't need any of this. There is nothing beneficial that your christ cult provides to White society that couldn't be provided by a healthier medium.
Unless you believe in the afterlife, then salvation is provided.

Quote:
I have no problem stating what my views are, and nothing I believe requires subscribing to fairy tales of any sort. Jewish in nature, or otherwise.
Neither do I, but at least learn basic theology before calling something jewish when it's actually an antithesis.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
The Vatican I church was anti-White, as me and others have shown in this topic. But you can choose to continue believing whatever makes you feel good. Because feeling good is more important than the facts, anyway, right?

National Socialism advocates a clear separation between Church and State. Meaning that Churches are to refrain from engaging in politics. It was decreed as such by Hitler and other members of the NSDAP. That's one of the core tenants of National Socialism. Christian priests were sent to camps right alongside jews and faggots for not heeding these demands. So you're OK with this?

Here is what Himmler had to say with regards to christianity:

Also, Himmler would not have made such a bold stance against christianity, if Hitler didn't also agree. I believe the policy of the NSDAP was to eventually phase out christianity, slowly, from German life. They wanted to handle the matter with kid gloves, and not rock the boat too much. Programs such as "Positive Christianity" give credence to this being their actual position. I think it gives some legitimacy to "Hitler's table talk", where Hitler appears to be on the same page as Himmler with regards to christianity (in private), even though he's a Catholic:

https://www.davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html
You posted one Himmler quote but there are plenty of Hitler quotes to the contrary. Here a leftist filth is lamenting that the National Socialist movement was indeed very Christian orientated:

Quote:
Adolf Hitler was baptized in a Catholic Church in 1889 and was never be excommunicated or in any other way officially censured by the Catholic Church. Hitler frequently referred to and Christianity in his speeches and writings. In one 1933 speech, he said: "To do justice to God and our own conscience, we have turned once more to the German Volk." In another he said: "We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out."

In a 1922 speech, he said:

"My feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter.

In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed his blood upon the Cross.

As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. ...
And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly, it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people. And when I look on my people I see them work and work and toil and labor, and at the end of the week they have only for their wages wretchedness and misery. When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in their queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil, if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people are plundered and exploited."
https://www.thoughtco.com/hitler-was-an-atheist-250215

Positive Christianity was an uncucking. If they wanted to phase it out, they actually rocked the boat the other way by shutting down the "Freethinkers."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German...hinkers_League

"Freethinkers Hall, the national headquarters of the League, was then converted to a bureau advising the public on church matters."

Quote:
I stated being an atheist previously, but the difference between atheist and agnostic are often blurred. I'm open to the possibility of the existence of higher beings, that we might define as 'gods'. But I most definitely do not believe in the christian interpretation of this. The existence of your god, specifically, as defined by the buy-bull, I deny.
Or is it that you learned that the NSDAP was actually an anti-atheist movement and would rather call yourself an "agnostic?"

So you're "open" to the possibility of a higher force, just not the God of the Catholic Church. What would make the existence of say, Krishna, more likely than the Holy Trinity?


Quote:
I deny that your Jesus (pronounced like spics do, etc hey-sus), if he ever existed, was anything other than a trickster who commanded a coterie of gullible idiots. And stirred up enough of a fuss to get executed. Claiming to be the "King of the Jews" probably didn't help matters any. Claiming to be King, when you're not, would have gotten you executed in quite a few countries in the ancient world.
In Latin, which is what - lesvs nazarenvs rex lvdaeorvm- was written in, it is pronounced with an English Y sound. The "fuss" was telling jews to clean up their act, which is why they accused Him of "blasphemy" and lied to the Roman authorities about Christ being a threat to the state. They demanded that Pilate change the wording to "I am King of the Jews" to make the execution seem justifiable but he refused, probably to show that they had Him killed out of spite.

Last edited by Man of the road; January 25th, 2018 at 08:14 PM.
 
Old January 26th, 2018 #1237
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Since you missed this:

https://www.davnet.org/kevin/articles/table.html

Quote:
On a question from C. S., whether this antagonism might mean a war, the Fuehrer continued:

No, it does not mean a war. The ideal solution would be to leave the religions to devour themselves, without persecutions. But in that case we must not replace the Church by something equivalent. That would be terrifying! It goes without saying that the whole thing needs a lot of thought. Everything will occur in due time. It is a simple question of honesty, that's what it will finally boil down to.

In England, the status of the individual in relation to the Church is governed by considerations of State. In America, it's all purely a matter of conformism.

The German people's especial quality is patience; and it's the only one of the peoples capable of undertaking a revolution in this sphere. It could do it, if only for the reason that only the German people has made moral law the governing principle of action.

The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity. Bolshevism practises a lie of the same nature, when it claims to bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to enslave them. In the ancient world, the relations between men and gods were founded on an instinctive respect. It was a world enlightened by the idea of tolerance. Christianity was the first creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of love. Its key-note is intolerance.

Without Christianity, we should not have had Islam. The Roman Empire, under Germanic influence, would have developed in the direction of world-domination, and humanity would not have extinguished fifteen centuries of civilisation at a single stroke.

Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things. [pp. 4-5]
And:

Quote:
Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.[p. 51]
+ lots more.

Most of the pro-Christian statements were from the 20s. I think Hitler changed his mind about christianity, and the church, in later years.

Also, from Goebbels:

Quote:
What does Christianity mean today? National Socialism is a religion. All we lack is a religious genius capable of uprooting outmoded religious practices and putting new ones in their place. We lack traditions and ritual. One day soon National Socialism will be the religion of all Germans. My Party is my church, and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do his will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel.

Joseph Goebbels
And:

Quote:
Martin Bormann: “National Socialist and Christian concepts are incompatible."
Keep in mind, that this man was very close to Hitler.

And Man of the Road, you're right about one thing. The NSDAP was going to 'un-cuck' Germany. They were going to slowly phase out christianity.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER

Last edited by Crowe; January 26th, 2018 at 07:23 AM.
 
Old January 26th, 2018 #1238
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Man of the road View Post
So you're "open" to the possibility of a higher force, just not the God of the Catholic Church. What would make the existence of say, Krishna, more likely than the Holy Trinity?
Nothing. My belief is basically this: If god/s exist, I think men have it entirely wrong. Certainly with regards to ascertaining their intent. I don't believe such beings require our faith, or worship, or gratitude, any more than we require such things from maggots. I don't believe in gods who are as incompetent as the jewish scribes who wrote your scriptures. People have a hard time understanding that we're just one plant in an extremely vast cosmos. We're nothing. Christians have a very Earth centrist view of the cosmos, whereas somebody like me recognizes the reality that we're a speck of dust in the vastness of the universe.
__________________
Low-IQ bible scholars are legion, the big book o' bullshit is catnip to the underbrained. --ALEX LINDER
 
Old January 26th, 2018 #1239
Scaramantula
Zen Fascist
 
Scaramantula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Val Verde
Posts: 401
Default

There's an old saying:

"Judge them by the company they keep"

Hitler surrounded himself with openly rabid anti-Christians like Himmler, Bormann, Rosenberg, Goebbels and Heydrich.

Hardly the people a devout Christian would want to be around.
__________________
Women have spent the last 100 years proving men have been right about them for the past 100,000 years.
 
Old January 27th, 2018 #1240
Jimmy Marr
Moderator
 
Jimmy Marr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
Default

Rex Imperator takes a modest approach to dealing with retards:

Quote:
[I'm] more pragmatic about the CQ. Any reading of Christian doctrine reveals it to be a protoMarxist system designed to degrade the goyim. But few Christians actually read the doctrine. To them, it's more of an elaborate symbol than a cogent belief structure. It is the quintessentially European motif of sacrifice dressed up in the cultural baggage of the country which holds such appeal to the masses. They keep it because it is tradition, because it represents opposition to modern degeneracy, but not out of any critical inspection of its claims or content.

This is why the Jews have adopted their schizophrenic treatment of it. As a cultural institution, it had transmuted into something more European than Semitic in practicality, and so had to be dismantled. Thus attacking it en masse and specifically among the youth, while milking shekels out of the Boomers inextricably immersed in it for muh greatest ally the Chosen People™. You can even see them engaging in a simultaneous top-down reverse transmutation back into a Semitic death cult with the social justice push apparent at nearly every church in the area. Truly nefarious.

For our purposes, I'm not going to rule out appealing to Christian identity in the short-term. If this is ever going to be resolved without Plan Siege, we don't have the necessary time to abolish and replace that component of the American identity with something healthier among our target demographics. It will be a gradual process, as it was during the Third Reich.
 
Reply

Tags
#1, christianity

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.
Page generated in 0.39325 seconds.