Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old September 15th, 2020 #301
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Are These Antifa/BLM Riots A Jewish Coup?


Kevin MacDonald • September 12, 2020



It was always obvious to those of us on campus in the Vietnam years that if you fired at random into a mob of student protestors you would hit a lot of Jews, and that is exactly what happened at Kent State in 1970 (three out of the four dead) [Remembering the Jews of Kent State, 45 Years Later, by Anne Cohen, The Forward, May 4, 2015]. Subsequently, Stanley Rothman documented the key Jewish role in the New Left in his definitive 1982 study Roots of Radicalism: Jews, Christians, and the New Left. Similarly, at least one (Joseph Rosenbaum) and possibly two (Anthony W. Huber) of the Antifa shot in self-defense by Kenosha WI lifeguard Kyle Rittenhouse appear to have been Jews. (In a now-deleted post, the Jewish Chronicle tried to downplay Rosenbaum by saying he was “non-practicing.”) [Rosenbaum, not Jewish but targeted by antisemitism after death during unrest, by Rob Golub, August 27, 2020]. Will scholars eventually find that the Black Lives Matter moral panic that has convulsed the U.S. in 2020 also had a substantial Jewish component—that it is, in fact, a Color Revolution-style attempted Jewish coup?
(...)
This summer of riots and statue-toppling, like the late-winter impeachment farce, should not be seen as a one-off event. I believe it is part of the struggle between our new, Jewish-dominated elite, mostly stemming from the 1880–1920 First Great Wave of immigration, and the traditional white Christian majority of America, significantly derived from pre-Revolutionary colonial stock but augmented by subsequent white Christian immigration, from which America’s historic so-called WASP elite was derived.
(...)
So how to conceptualize Jewish involvement? As documented in my book The Culture of Critique, Jews have been the backbone of the American Left since they arrived in America and are central to the new elite that emerged in the counterculture of the 1960s. The Frankfurt School, largely shaped by Jewish refugees from Hitler, reconceptualized anti-Semitism as resulting, not from class conflict as orthodox Marxism had claimed, but from ethnic conflict. Similarly, Jewish activism in the post-World-War-II U.S. focused on importing non-Whites as allies of Jews in opposition to the traditional White American majority. Hence the critical role of Jews and Jewish organizations in the passage of the 1965 Immigration Act.

Jews and Jewish organizations have allied themselves with Blacks since the early twentieth Century with the founding of the NAACP. And, despite a substantial history of Black anti-Semitism (e.g., Louis Farrakhan, the recent spate of attacks on Orthodox Jews in New York, anti-Jewish statements by Black media figures like Nick Cannon—who also thinks Blacks are superior to White people but only apologized to Jews), this alliance continues into the present.

(But the Cannon incident shows brings into focus that there are limits to Cancel Culture. Steve Sailer has pointed out that previous black insurrections have been stopped when they begin to criticize Jews, which he thinks is happening now).

Some Jews have taken the opportunity of recent developments in Cancel Culture to put forth their own continuing grievances against the West. Hence the Jewish campaign to remove the statue of French king Louis IX (Saint Louis) from a park in his namesake city of St. Louis. [Should St. Louis take down the statue of its anti-Semitic namesake? Activists say yes., by Ben Sales , Jewish Telegraphic Agency, June 26, 2020]

In this spirit, the Forward’s Aiden Pink helpfully supplied a list of 8 “anti-Semites” who still have memorials in the U.S.: Charles Lindbergh (who correctly identified Jews as one pressure group attempting to get the U.S. into World War II), Gen. George S. Patton (who was unsympathetic to the post-World War II treatment of Germans and Jews), Henry Ford (publisher of The International Jew), Peter Stuyvesant (who tried to prevent Jews from settling in New York), Martin Luther (author of On the Jews and Their Lies), President Ulysses S. Grant (who issued an order expelling Jewish cotton speculators from areas under his command during the Civil War), Mary Elizabeth Lease (who linked Jews with banking as part of her populism), and Thomas E. Watson (who led a campaign against Jewish accused murderer Leo Frank). [8 American monuments celebrating anti-Semites, June 23, 2020]
Read the rest here:

https://www.unz.com/article/are-thes...a-jewish-coup/
 
Old September 16th, 2020 #302
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Hypocrisy Thy Name Is Zion


Jewish groups support BLM while ignoring Palestinian genocide

Philip Giraldi • September 8, 2020

(...) Interestingly, Jewish groups in the United States have been in the forefront in supporting BLM’s apparent mission to upend what used to pass for America’s European-derived culture. Ironically, that culture includes free speech, democracy and mercantilism, all of which have greatly benefited Jews. The narrative is, of course, being wrapped around the common cause of blacks and Jews together fighting against the alleged white nationalists who are being blamed by the media for much of the violence taking place even when videos taken at the scenes of the rioting definitely show nearly all black mobs doing the arson and looting.

And blacks who are skeptical of the Jewish role are quickly put in their place, as was Rodney Muhammad of Philadelphia, who was removed from his executive position with the NAACP after expressing skepticism about all the Jewish friends that blacks suddenly appeared to be acquiring, quoting an observation often attributed to the now disgraced Voltaire on a Facebook entry, “To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”
(...)
And ADL is not alone in its defense of BLM. More than six hundred Jewish groups have signed on to a full page newspaper ad supporting the movement. The ad says “We speak with one voice when we say, unequivocally: Black Lives Matter” and then goes on to assert “There are politicians and political movements in this country who build power by deliberately manufacturing fear to divide us against each other. All too often, anti-Semitism is at the center of these manufactured divisions.”

So, once again, it is all about the perpetual victimhood of Jews. That Jews constitute the wealthiest and best educated demographic in the United States would seem to suggest that they are especially favored, which they are, rather than targeted by raging mobs of hillbillies. More than 90% of discretionary Department of Homeland Security funds goes to protect Jewish facilities and the Department of Education and Congress are always prepared to create new rules protecting Jews from feeling “uncomfortable” in their occasional interactions with critics of Israel.

Jews largely think and vote progressive, which is part of the reason for aligning with blacks even though rioting and looting is likely to affect them more than other demographics as many of them might still have businesses in the cities that are most likely to be hit. But there is also a much bigger reason to do so. Many blacks in BLM as well as progressive white supporters were beginning to suggest that the movement should broaden its agenda and recognize inter alia the suffering of others, to include the Palestinian people. A strong show of support from Jewish groups, backed up by what one might presume to be a flow of contributions to the cause, would presumably be a way of nipping that sentiment in the bud just as Jewish donors to the Democratic Party were able to block any language in the party platform sympathetic to the Palestinians.

It is of course the ultimate irony that Jewish groups are very sensitive to the suffering of blacks in the United State while at the same time largely ignoring the war crimes and other devastation going on in Israel and Palestine at the hands of their co-religionists. The beating and shooting of unarmed and unresisting Palestinians, to include children, the destruction of the livelihoods of farmers, and the demolition of homes to make way for Jewish settlers is beyond belief and is largely invisible as the Jewish influenced U.S. media does not report it. It is, simply put, genocide. And on top of that, Israel has been bombing defenseless civilians in Gaza nearly daily of late, attacking and destabilizing Lebanon and Syria, and also conniving with American Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to go to war with Iran.
Read the rest here:

https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/hypocri...-name-is-zion/
 
Old September 17th, 2020 #303
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Jewish philanthropist Susan Sandler is donating $200 million to fight racism


September 17, 2020 3:28 pm

(JTA) — Susan Sandler, a progressive Jewish philanthropist, said she is donating $200 million to racial justice causes in this country.

Sandler said Monday that she was establishing the Susan Sandler Fund to support a number of organizations, led by people of color, that are fighting racism in the South and Southwest, The New York Times reported.
https://www.jta.org/quick-reads/jewi...o-fight-racism

 
Old September 17th, 2020 #304
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

.
Look what happens on Fox News when Newt Gingrich points out that (the evil globalist jew) George Soros is funding the election of left-wing prosecutors:

Quote:
Fox News Cuts Off Newt Gingrich After He Points Out George Soros Role in Electing Prosecutors




JOEL B. POLLAK and PENNY STARR 17 Sep 2020

Fox News cut off former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich on Wednesday after he brought up the role of billionaire left-wing financier George Soros in funding the election of left-wing prosecutors in local races over the past several years.

Gingrich argued that the rise in crime in many Democrat-governed cities was partly the result of the election of left-wing district attorneys who had received financial assistance from George Soros.

But commentators Melissa Francis and Marie Harf attempted to silence Gingrich.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...g-prosecutors/

Here's the segment:


And some of the Youtube comments:

Quote:
They looked scared for their lives, honestly.
Quote:
When everything the American public believe is a lie, CIA has done its job.
Quote:
when the mask falls off temporarily
Quote:
This is one of the strangest interview conclusions I have ever seen.
Who is the blonde woman so desperate to keep George Soros out of the discussion? And why did Fox News go along with this shutdown on the Soros comments by the former Speaker of the House? Is the panel scared of something? Does Fox News not have its facts together on Soros? Wow. Now I am curious.
Quote:
Don't mention the name of he whom lines our pockets.
Quote:
Why don't we need to bring George Soros into it? He paid for it. This is a fact, that is verifiable by Soros' own sources.
Quote:
Fox News is controlled opposition.
Quote:
Fox News personnel obviously have their orders to NOT call out Soros.
Quote:
TO KNOW WHO CONTROLS YOU SEE WHO YOU CANT CRITICIZE
 
Old September 18th, 2020 #305
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Soros-Backed Coalition Preparing for Post-Election Day Chaos — ‘We’re Going to Fight Like Hell’




JOSHUA KLEIN 17 Sep 2020

Under the guise of seeking to “prevent a constitutional crisis,” a massive network of well funded left-wing activists and progressive groups are training, organizing, and planning to mobilize millions of Americans should President Trump “contest the election results,” refuse to concede, or claim an early victory.

More than 80 advocacy groups and grassroots organizations have joined in a broad coalition calling itself “Protect the Results” and proclaiming that “we cannot ignore the threat that Trump poses to our democracy and a peaceful transition of power.”

The coalition is a joint project of Indivisible and Stand Up America, two left-wing groups founded in response to President Trump’s 2016 election and whose goals are “to organize and resist Trump’s dangerous agenda” and “to defeat Trump and his enablers.”

Seeking to “protect” election results by use of its millions of members, the coalition calls to “take coordinated action” and “prepare for a potential post-election crisis.”
(...)
Ezra Levin, co-founder of Indivisible, tweeted:

New cover story in the Nation from @AbramskySasha. Trump’s a loser and will try to cheat, so we’re preparing
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ght-like-hell/
 
Old September 19th, 2020 #306
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Nolte: BLM Riots Are Officially the Most Costly Manmade Damage to American Property in History




JOHN NOLTE 16 Sep 2020

The domestic terrorists in Antifa and Black Lives Matter have accomplished one thing: the most costly riots in the history of our country, reports the far-left Axios.

Property Claim Services, a company that tracks insurance claims filed due to riots and the like, found that the left-wing riots that occurred between May 26 and June 8 of this year could reach $2 billion in insurance claims.

Obviously, because the left’s domestic terrorism extended well beyond June 8 and is still ongoing, the company acknowledges “this is still happening, so the losses could be significantly more.”

Most importantly, these estimates are all being compared based on 2020 dollars. Meaning, previous riots, like the 1992 Rodney King Riots in Los Angeles, cost $775 million in 1992 dollars. That adds up to $1.42 billion today, which is still lower than the $2 billion Black Lives Matter Riots estimate — which again only covers eight or nine days of rioting that has never really stopped.

Here’s a piece of perspective that shocked even me…
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ty-in-history/
 
Old September 19th, 2020 #307
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
Here's an article about how jewish Google protects BLM:


Read the rest here:

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/...-lives-matter/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Page


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Brin


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Porat

Larry Page and Sergey Brin. "Trust us, goyim."


I still remember around six or seven years ago, when you type the word "nigger" in a Google search, there would be search suggestions like "why do niggers stink", "why are niggers so loud and obnoxious", "why are niggers so poor" etc showing up.

There is no single search suggestion that is even remotely racist or negative to Blacks on Joogle showing up anymore.

When you type the word nigger you won't get any search suggestions at all.

And you're more than likely to get these stupid unreadable Captchas instead, because they think of you as a "Hitlerbot" for ever typing the word nigger in their search engine.

So they are showing their true colours now. their anti-White racism is on full display to the point of absurdity. like when you google "American inventors" there would be mostly Blacks showing up on the list.

I think any normal person would get freaked out, and be like "WTF!?" by such rigged results.
As they become more obvious in their agenda , more people will start to question the legitimacy of their search results.

Hopefully It will lead those people to their awakening..
 
Old September 19th, 2020 #308
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinhead Zack View Post
(...) So they are showing their true colours now. their anti-White racism is on full display to the point of absurdity. like when you google "American inventors" there would be mostly Blacks showing up on the list. (...)
Yeah, here's the Jewgle screenshot (click on it to enlarge it):



So eight out of ten famous American inventors were negroes?

Good grief...
 
Old September 20th, 2020 #309
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default BLM is an NGO

Mike Whitney
The Unz Review
Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:00 UTC

Let's assume that Black Lives Matter is not a "social justice" movement, but a corporate-sponsored public relations vehicle that's being used to advance the agenda of elites? Is that too much of a stretch?

And let's say that the massive protests that erupted across the country were not random or spontaneous events as some people seem to think, but part of a broader strategy to control the headlines by shifting the dominant "narrative" to race. The death of George Floyd fits perfectly with this "broader strategy", as the incident took place 6 months before the general election, which (conveniently) gave the Democrats enough time to mount an effective attack on Donald Trump using an issue on which they feel he is particularly vulnerable. (Race)

Was it all a coincidence?

Maybe or maybe not. But it's certainly worth investigating, after all, we've just endured 3 and a half years of relentless fabrications connected to the Russiagate scam, so the idea that this latest headline-grabbing fiasco might be, well, fake, is certainly within the realm of possibility.

So, let's see if we can figure out "why" wealthy elites and their giant charitable foundations would choose to dump millions of dollars into an organization that claims to be Marxist. Could be that....

1/ They are genuinely committed to social justice for black people?

2/ They think "racist" cops are the Number 1 problem facing black people today?

3/ They think the massive protests are raising consciousness which will have a transformative effect on the country?

4/ They need a flashy social justice organization (BLM) to divert attention from widening inequality, spiraling unemployment, ballooning poverty, shrinking growth, and the savage restructuring of the economy that is creating a permanent underclass forced to scrape by at food banks, homeless shelters and tent cities that are sprouting up across the country but which are religiously ignored by our prostitute media?

If you chose Number 4, you guessed right. The protests, demonstrations and riots are all part of a spectacular "Product Launch", the most impressive Madison Avenue-type extravaganza of all-time. BLM has exploded onto the scene just months before the election eliminating all of the 10 Top issues listed by Gallup that voters really care about, and skillfully shifting the public's attention to race, race relations, social justice and cops. What an astonishing turnaround! In the old days we would have called this the "old switcheroo", an art-form that has been perfected by BLM (and their Democrat handlers) who have turned the election on its head by burning down half the country, then claiming they are the victims. How's that for twisted logic?

So, what can we say definitively about BLM? What does the group really believe and what is it trying to achieve? Having spent a fair amount of time on their website, I'm still puzzled. The website contains a number of emotive videos with pulsing background music and lively narration. But-like everything else with this shadowy group- there doesn't seem to be much substance. The emphasis seems to be on appearances rather than policy, slogans rather than remedies, and catchy monikers (Black Lives Matter) rather than thoughtful recommendations for real change. So, where's the beef? Who is Black Lives Matter and what do they want?

Are they a civil rights group in the tradition of Martin Luther King?

No.

Are they a black power group in the tradition of Malcolm X and the Black Panthers?

Nope.

Are they "Marxists" like they say?

Of course not. Have you ever heard them talk about "historical materialism", "social relations", "capitalist accumulation", or any of the other concepts that are central to Marxist ideology? No. Heck, they don't even talk about the glorious "revolution" that's supposed to topple the capitalist system and pave the way to "socialist utopia".

Why would anyone call themselves a Marxist when they never talk about revolution, wage-labor or class struggle? Why?

Because it's a silly affectation that appeals to leftists, that's why. It's like wearing a beret to an art exhibit, it's a meaningless display of ideological conformity. The Marxist label is a glitzy designation that is intended to mislead the public about who runs the group, how it is organized, what its leaders believe and what their true intentions are. The idea that a "trained Marxist" - who wholeheartedly believes that society is broken into "classes whose interests stand in irreconcilable opposition" - would create a group whose views are entirely shaped by race and race relations is patently absurd. It is a contradiction in terms. These are not Marxists leaders and this is not a "social justice" movement. So, what are they?


Quote:
Comment: While many of them may not be Marxists per se, they most certainly emote the fervor of cultural Marxism, or an ideology of victimhood.
They're an NGO, a non-governmental organization which provides services to its members and its patrons. Like many NGOs, they have won the public's trust, which makes them a useful proxy for stakeholders who remain largely in the shadows. In short, BLM is corporate-funded, agenda-driven franchise performing the tasks that best promote the interests of its deep-pocket contributors. The grassroots social justice stuff is mostly baloney.

And who are the contributors? Check out this excerpt from an article at The Unz Review:

Quote:
"In the wake of the racial unrest which followed Freddie Gray's death in Baltimore in 2015, George Soros's Open Society Institute donated $650,000 to Black Lives Matter...According to one watchdog group, "In 2016 organizations in the Black Lives Matter movement received $33 million in grants from the Open Society Foundations, founded by Hungarian hedge fund manager George Soros in 1993, and the Center for American Progress, founded by former White House chief of staff and Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta in 2003." According to the Washington Times, access to Soros money insured another $100 million from "a series of wealthy liberal foundations including The Ford Foundation, in addition to $33 million in grants from the Open Society Foundations, with additional grant-making from the Center for American Progress." ("The Invisible Man at the Race Riots", E Michael Jones, The Unz Review)

Is it safe to assume that the money flowing into BLM from these uber-Capitalists is not being provided to support a "Marxist" revolution?

Yes, that's a fair assumption. Big donors don't hand out millions of dollars to groups that want to overthrow capitalism and redistribute their wealth to the struggling proles. That's NOT why they're funding BLM. They're funding BLM because it is an effective vehicle for achieving their political ambitions while hiding behind the fig leaf of "social justice". That's what's really going on. BLM is just a mask behind which the elites operate.

And what do these donors get for their money?

They get a logistically-sophisticated, well-trained, fully-mobilized domestic insurgency which is capable of inflicting massive damage on cities or towns across the country at a moment's notice. They also get an activist militia that uses military-type tactics while taking advantage of a highly-developed social media infrastructure which is second to none. Finally, they get an experienced band of street-smart hooligans capable of prosecuting a hybrid war on the state, the objective of which is to undermine confidence in government institutions, roll back critical civil liberties protections, plunge the country into a protracted, fratricidal war, replace the existing Constitutional Republic with a new authoritarian order and spread social unrest and mayhem from sea to shining sea. If you are a foreign oligarch who wants to transform America into an impoverished Third World Shithole, BLM is not a bad place to put your money.
 
Old September 20th, 2020 #310
Dawn Cannon
Senior Member
 
Dawn Cannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The Vampire Ball
Posts: 6,409
Default

Of course, according to Wikipedia, there are no "Financial transparency issues". Take a look:
"Some observers have stated that the Black Lives Matter nonprofit does not adequately disclose what their financial contributions are spent on. Executives from Black Lives Matter have denied that it uses ActBlue to donate to the Democratic National Committee. In an AskReddit thread, Black Lives Matter indicated that their expenditures include "... civic engagement, expansion of chapters, Arts & Culture, organizing and digital advocacy resources and tools." (Wikipedia)"
"Civic engagement"?!?

Is that like 'burning down a furniture store in Kenosha' or beating a 70 year-old Asian woman to death with a 2×4? The group needs to clarify.

The funding issue is not going to go away nor should it. The American people need to know who is providing the resources for the massive rampage that took place in over 700 cities across the country. As yet, not one US corporation has withheld donations pending an investigation of whether BLM was responsible for the damage or not. Why is that, do you think?

Is it because these foundations and plutocrats are getting exactly what they paid for?

Uh huh. What we know for certain, is that the riots were the worst in the nation's history and that the insurance payouts already exceed $2 billion. Check it out from RT:


Quote:
"The tidal wave of arson, vandalism, and other property crimes that swept across the nation in the aftermath of the Floyd killing left between $1 billion and $2 billion in damages, as measured by insurance claims paid out by the industry....
Quote:
While that figure represents only the damage done between May 26 and June 8 - meaning the real figure taking into account the destruction in cities like Portland and Kenosha is likely much higher - it still represents the worst riot damage in insurance industry history, according to the report. Previously, only natural disasters like hurricanes and floods had resulted in over $1 billion in damage claims." ("George Floyd riots cost insurance companies as much as $2 BILLION - more than any in HISTORY, industry claims", RT)
We also know that BLM was at the center of the action despite the pathetic coverup by the Democrat-owned media. Here's more background from an article at The Federalist:

Quote:
"Contrary to corporate media narratives, up to 95 percent of this summer's riots are linked to Black Lives Matter activism, according to data collected by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED). The data also show that nearly 6 percent — or more than 1 in 20 — of U.S. protests between May 26 and Sept. 5 involved rioting, looting, and similar violence, including 47 fatalities....

Of the 633 incidents coded as riots, 88 percent are recorded as involving Black Lives Matter activists....BLM activists were involved in 95 percent of the riots for which there is information about the perpetrators' affiliation...

...the data shows just how widespread the summer BLM-linked rioting has been. It has not been limited merely to anarchist strongholds such as Portland, Oregon... but has stretched across both major and minor U.S. cities and included dozens of locales with no violent police incidents this summer. ("Study: Up To 95 Percent Of 2020 U.S. Riots Are Linked To Black Lives Matter", The Federalist)
See what I mean? So, don't be confused by the media's obfuscation. These riots have BLM fingerprints all over them.

Fortunately, 50 House Republicans have asked Attorney General Barr to investigate this summer's riots and determine where these groups are getting their money. In their letter to Barr they said:

Quote:
"It is clear that these individuals are well-funded and supported by a national network of left-wing activists committed to perpetrating violence and furthering anarchy in our streets... As such, we urge you to immediately open an investigation to identify and prosecute all individuals and groups responsible for funding and organizing these terroristic acts that are wreaking havoc on our nation." ("House Republicans Demand DOJ Investigate Organized Riots", The Federalist)
It's clear, that the Republican congressmen are referring to Antifa and other Black Bloc groups, but it probably won't matter. Once the investigation begins, BLM's finances will come under greater scrutiny and we'll finally see the source of their funding and how it filters through the organization. I'm not at all convinced that BLM is the leaderless "non-hierarchical" organization they pretend to be. That's another "leftist" fable. Large piles of money are not handed off to clerks in the back of the plant. They are given to trusted leaders who distribute the loot in a way that meets the requirements of the donors. BLM is not a charity, it's a franchise, which means it's probably run like every other top-down business.

The most damning critique of BLM appeared in an April, 2017 article at the World Socialist Web Site titled "Black Lives Matter cashes in on Black Capitalism". The article is an excellent investigative piece that provides essential information for understanding how BLM is set-up, who provides the funding, how the group has aligned itself with elite organizations, and how it is being used to splinter the working class consistent with the Democrats "divide and conquer" political strategy. Here's an extended excerpt from the piece which is "must read" material:

Quote:
"Last summer, the Ford Foundation, one of the most powerful private foundations in the world, announced that it was organizing to channel $100 million to the Black Lives Movement over the next six years... In a statement of support, Ford called for the group to grow and prosper. "We want to nurture bold experiments and help the movement build the solid foundation that will enable it to flourish."...
From the beginning, the "mothers of the movement" Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors and Opal Tometi...specifically opposed uniting blacks, whites and immigrants against the brutal class-war policies of the capitalist state. Instead, the group did its best to confine anti-police violence protests within the framework of the capitalist system and push a racialist and pro-capitalist agenda.

Even prior to 2013, however, all three of the cofounders had developed close ties to corporations, foundations, academia and/or government-sponsored agencies. Tometi, in particular, was a well-known quantity in these circles. She had spoken at the UN ... had been to the White House and met with Obama liaison Heather Foster, and addressed the Aspen Institute, a high-level think tank associated with the US military and intelligence community....

The real substance of the group's policies is the unremitting injection of racial divisions and animosity into the movement of opposition to police violence. It aims to update the age-old tactic of divide and conquer, seeking to prevent the unity of the working class — black, white and immigrant — from challenging the capitalist system, the source of the deepening social and political oppression.

.....The Ford Foundation — with its long history stretching from its CIA fronts in the 1940s and the promotion of black capitalism in Detroit in the aftermath of the 1967 riots — provided a financial anchor for BLM's expansion.

The Ford Foundation enlisted other such "philanthro-capitalists": the Hill-Snowden Foundation, Solidaire (Ford Foundation and Leah Hunt-Hendrix, granddaughter of the oil and gas tycoon H.L. Hunt), the NoVo Foundation (started by Warren Buffett's son Peter and daughter-in-law Jennifer Buffett in 2006), the Association of Black Foundation Executives (Kellogg Foundation and JPMorgan Chase and its Black Organization for Leadership Development [BOLD]), the Neighborhood Funders Group-Funders for Justice (also funded by Ford), among others.

The media and the state

While spontaneous protests began to adopt the #BLM hashtag as opposition to police violence developed, it was the promotion by the bourgeois media that brought #BLM into national prominence.... As data accumulated by killedbypolice.net and other news media sources underscored the fact that police killings were directed against poor and working-class whites as well as inner-city blacks, the issues of social inequality, poverty and class began to take center stage. The more universal slogan "All Lives Matter" came into wide use.

BLM denounced the specter of growing class unity and decried "All Lives Matter" as illegitimate and even racist....

BLM personnel meanwhile were being groomed for top-level official positions. Leading Black Lives Matter spokespersons made repeated trips to the White House in 2015 and 2016 to hold meetings with President Obama and his representatives. The Democratic Party was conferring official authority upon the group. ...

Later in July, at a separate meeting with Obama, Mckesson and Packnett agreed that Packnett would serve as an official representative on Obama's Task Force for 21st Century Policing...

These remarkable meetings of top Black Lives Matter associates with the US president and his top police agencies demonstrated that the group had no objection to being incorporated into the state apparatus. Indeed, a "seat at the table" was their aim....BLM's hostility to the working class and reactionary rhetoric play an ever more dangerous role in the current political climate, dovetailing with the extreme right wing and legitimizing racialism.

Their assessment of the election of Donald Trump demonized the white working class, a view also promoted by Hillary Clinton, the New York Times and other pro-Democratic Party media. Utterly hostile to the unification of the working class against the class-war policies of the new government, BLM sees the possibility of "opportunities" under the Trump administration. Vowing to train 300 black leaders to take positions on "school boards, city councils, neighborhood councils, and every branch of government," the group looks to a further political future within the Democratic Party."
("Black Lives Matter cashes in on black capitalism", World Socialist Web Site)
END


Does it sound like BLM is a cog in a much bigger corporate-political-elitist machine?

Yes, it does.

Does it sound like they are being used to fragment and suppress the emerging populist movement that supports Trump's nationalism over the Democrat's globalism?

Yes, again.

Then, what can we glean from this article in the WSWS?

We can assume that BLM is largely an invention of ruling class elites to divert attention from the collapsing economy and the unprecedented human catastrophe that will follow shortly after the election. The plan involves shifting public attention to divisive racial issues that put working people at each other's throats while concealing the vicious class war that is being prosecuted behind the shield of a fake social justice movement.

Bottom line: BLM is not the friend of working people, in fact, it is funded by their sworn enemies. They are the footsoldiers in the War on the Deplorables.

https://www.sott.net/article/441648-...he-deplorables
 
Old September 20th, 2020 #311
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
Look what happens on Fox News when Newt Gingrich points out that (the evil globalist jew) George Soros is funding the election of left-wing prosecutors:
Quote:
Nolte: Harris Faulkner Issues Awkward Statement About Gingrich-Soros Fiasco


John Nolte 17 Sep 2020

The Fox News Channel’s Harris Faulkner issued a bizarre statement Thursday, one day after an unforgivable debacle involving former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich.

On Wednesday, Gingrich appeared on Outnumbered and accurately tied the nearly four months of rioting to leftist billionaire George Soros, who, over the past few years, has gone into a number of states to financially back “progressive” prosecutors, the very people making all this rioting possible. Bottom line: these Soros-backed prosecutors are making the nonstop riots possible because they refuse to prosecute the rioters.

This revolving door is deliberate, and is meant to not only keep the rioters rioting, but to encourage those who would normally fear prosecution to come out and riot.

After Gingrich stated this fact on Fox’s Wednesday edition of Outnumbered, co-host Melissa Francis said, “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this.”

Gingrich responded, again with 100 percent accuracy: “He paid for it. I mean, why can’t we discuss that fact that millions of dollars….”.

“No he didn’t,” Marie Harf interjected with fake news. “I agree with Melissa. George Soros doesn’t need to be a part of this conversation.”

“Okay, so it’s verboten,’ Gingich said of the truth — meaning the truth is forbidden on Fox News.
Read the rest here:

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/...-soros-fiasco/
 
Old September 20th, 2020 #312
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
3 dead after gunman wearing t-shirt ‘with BLM slogan’ goes on ‘totally random’ shooting spree in Kentucky


20 Sep, 2020 21:08 / Updated 3 hours ago




Police in Louisville, Kentucky, have arrested a man for shooting three men dead in a bar. The killer apparently struck without motive, and some commentators have accused the press of burying the story[/COLOR][/B].

Michael E. Rhynes Jr, 33, was arrested just after midnight on Saturday and charged with three counts of murder, after he allegedly walked into Bungalow Joe’s Bar and Grill, pulled a handgun, and shot three men dead at point-blank range.

“Nobody had ever seen this guy before,” bar owner Joe Bishop told WRDB News. “It was a totally random act. I didn’t think I’d be scrubbing blood off my patio on a Saturday morning."

The slaying did not appear to be racially motivated. Rhynes Jr is black, and he killed two white men and a black man. Yet as rumors circulated that Rhynes Jr was wearing a ‘Justice for Breonna Taylor’ t-shirt, some commenters online accused the national media of ignoring the story for ideological reasons.
https://www.rt.com/usa/501232-louisv...ect-blm-shirt/
 
Old September 21st, 2020 #313
Skinhead Zack
Senior Member
 
Skinhead Zack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Vinland
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
Yeah, here's the Jewgle screenshot (click on it to enlarge it):



So eight out of ten famous American inventors were negroes?

Good grief...
We wuz inventorz an sheeit :

Maybe they should rename themselves as Coongle.
(It is reasonable because Kikes are part-negro as well)
 
Old September 21st, 2020 #314
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

.
It seems that American sports fans are sick and tired of the jew-controlled NBA's constant BLM-propaganda:

Quote:
NBA Game 1 Eastern Conference Ratings Crash, League Numbers Down 45% Since 2012




WARNER TODD HUSTON 17 Sep 2020

The NBA’s ratings continue to plummet as the league moves through its conference finals this year. However, the crash isn’t a new thing. It’s been going on since 2012.

Game 1 of the finals featuring the Heat and Celtics earned only 4 million viewers, down significantly from last year’s Bucks-Raptors game of 5.5 million viewers, Outkick reported.

The ratings crash is even worse going back a few seasons. In 2018, Game 1 of the Eastern Conference Finals between the Cavs and Celtics saw 7.2 million viewers, making this year’s 4 million an even worse showing.

“The first round was down an eye-popping 27% year-over-year. In addition, the first round’s 1.94 million average is down 40% from two seasons ago, the last time LeBron James participated in the playoffs,” Outkick noted.
https://www.breitbart.com/sports/202...45-since-2012/

Quote:
Adam Silver (born April 25, 1962) is an American businessman, lawyer and sports executive who is the fifth and current commissioner of the National Basketball Association (NBA). (...) Silver was born into a Jewish-American family
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Silver

Adam Silver. "Trust me, goyim."



 
Old September 22nd, 2020 #315
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
White Bar Owner and Trump Supporter Commits Suicide After Black Ex-Federal Prosecutor Indicts Him For Shooting Looter


Eric Striker Sep 20, 2020



Nebraska bar owner and white Trump supporter Jake Gardner committed suicide today after a Grand Jury indicted him for manslaughter, use of a firearm in commission of a felony, terroristic threats, and numerous of other felonies in relation to the shooting of James Scurlock.

The shooting occurred on May 30th during a Black Lives Matter riot in Omaha. Gardner had posted up outside of his bar, The Hive, to prevent looters from attacking his business.

According to both witnesses and footage of the incident, 2 rioters tackled Gardner to the ground outside of his property. He pulled out his gun and fired warning shots in the air, which dispersed the attackers. Another assailant then put Gardner in a choke hold from behind which forced him to shoot and kill the aggressor, 22-year-old James Scurlock.

Omaha District Attorney Donald Kleine refused to charge Gardner, calling the shooting a textbook act of self-defense. This decision was overruled by a "special prosecutor" appointed to the case, former black federal prosecutor Frederick Franklin, who called a Grand Jury after left-wing activists dug up evidence that Gardner was a vocal Trump supporter and critic of Black Lives Matter.

Gardner and Scurlock had never met before May 30th. Former Assistant US Attorney Franklin showed the Grand Jury texts and Facebook messages revealing his political views, which he claimed was important in understanding the "frame of mind" of Gardner, and thus establishing the white man's criminal culpability three months after DA Kleine decided he was innocent.

A number of bizarre claims were used to try and frame Gardner as a frothing at the mouth racist in the media. A Medium post by a person claiming to know Gardner from June suggests that a reference on his LinkedIn page to being the founder of "EON Hospitality Management" might really be a coded nod to an obscure and short-lived World War II-era Greek 'Nazi' Youth organization.

According to reporting by The Gateway Pundit, shortly before committing suicide Gardner expressed concerned that his bail would be set at millions of dollars and he would not be able to afford to pay for his legal defense. Gardner attempted to raise money on Go Fund Me, but the for-profit company took his appeal down for political reasons. If convicted, Gardner would've been sentenced to 95 years in prison.

As for the "victim" Scurlock, he was filmed earlier on the night of his death looting and vandalizing various shops. He and four other black men were convicted and sentenced to prison 2015 for an armed home invasion, for which Scurlock served one year out of a five year sentence. Scurlock was convicted again for assault and battery in 2019, and once more for domestic assault in February 2020, which he served 90 days in jail for.

The death of Jake Gardner personifies how abusive the criminal justice system has become in the Trump-era. It is now normal for bounty-hunting prosecutors to use a white person's right-wing political views to try and establish criminal motives in cases where none exist, as seen with the McMichaels or the Wuestenbergs.
https://national-justice.com/white-b...r-indicted-him

 
Old September 23rd, 2020 #316
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

.
Published today:

Quote:
Newt Gingrich: George Soros Actively Working to ‘Undermine the American System’




THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D. 23 Sep 2020

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich said Monday that billionaire left-wing disrupter George Soros is actively working to undermine the American political system.

Radio host Eric Metaxas asked Gingrich to explain the bizarre incident that occurred on Fox News last Wednesday, when Fox News cut Gingrich off after he brought up the role of Soros in funding the election of left-wing district attorneys in local races over the past several years.
(...)
“Look, one of the members — Marie Harf — was actually John Kerry’s press person so her visceral reaction made perfect sense,” Gingrich added. “If you are a left-wing Democrat, you know that if the country learns how much George Soros is doing to undermine and destroy America that is a huge and indefensible position.”
https://www.breitbart.com/2020-elect...erican-system/
 
Old September 23rd, 2020 #317
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
'We have officer down': Officer SHOT as gunfire rings out in Louisville amid protests over Breonna Taylor charges


24 Sep, 2020 00:59 / Updated 1 minute ago

A police officer in Louisville has been shot amid chaotic protests over the lack of murder charges for the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor, with footage from the scene showing officers taking cover as gunfire erupts.

As groups of protesters squared off with police around Louisville on Wednesday night, multiple shots went off. One officer was shot, according to preliminary reports from law enforcement, which has provided no further details about the incident.
https://www.rt.com/usa/501538-office...aylor-protest/
 
Old September 24th, 2020 #318
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

.
LA's part-jewish mayor keeps agitating against white people:

Quote:
L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti: America Does Not Yet Have a Multiracial Democracy


Joel B. Pollak 23 Sep 2020

LOS ANGELES — Mayor Eric Garcetti told a press conference Wednesday evening that he was “deeply disappointed and saddened by today’s news” in the Breonna Taylor case in Louisville, Kentucky, in which one officer was indicted for wanton endangerment. Two other officers were not indicted by the grand jury.

Garcetti said that the charges in the case “had, unfortunately, nothing to do with the death of Breonna Taylor,” and that the grand jury decision had done “nothing to allay the fears of black families across the country that it could be their daughter, or their son, or the loves of their lives that could be next.”
(...)
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron said Wednesday that a witness had corroborated police claims that they had identified themselves as they served the warrant.

Nevertheless, Garcetti said that the decision of the grand jury was a reason “why we cannot, as a nation, stop saying ‘Black Lives Matter’.”
https://www.breitbart.com/crime/2020...ial-democracy/
 
Old September 27th, 2020 #319
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stewart Meadows View Post
.
The following op-ed from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz defends the anti-white terrorist organization Antifa:


https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.pre...jews-1.8902330
Yes, it's interesting how the "anti-racist" Antifa activists side with the racist, genocidal bandit state of Pissrael...







 
Old September 28th, 2020 #320
Stewart Meadows
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,499
Default

 
Reply

Tags
black lives matter, george floyd, george soros, jews, jon ossoff

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 AM.
Page generated in 0.34290 seconds.