Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old June 4th, 2011 #41
J. Kerr
Whats next?
 
J. Kerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Currently living on the outskirts of Diversity
Posts: 820
J. Kerr
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N.M. Valdez View Post
That would require that I be short. Since I posted photographic evidence that I'm not, it's a bit stupid for you to pretend otherwise.
Sure little-big chief!


Quote:
Originally Posted by N.M. Valdez View Post
Why is there never mention of "Italian-occupied government," or "IOG," considering the genomic similarities between wops and Ashkenazim?
Italians are some of the best people you will ever have the privilege to live amongst.
Italians keep a clean neighborhood and will chase niggers off.
To claim that jews and wops are alike just shows how stupid you really are.
 
Old June 6th, 2011 #42
Bernie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,302
Bernie
Default

Winston Churchill...........A shadowy London club called, 'The Focus'.........How a handful of wealthy British Jews bought the perfect political figure to start WW2 on the 29th of July 1936


The finest and most courageous Historian of WW2, David Irving fell foul of the British Establishment partly for revealing how Jews financed Churchill during the 10 years between 1929 to the start of WW2 a time in which he held no office at all and his sole income was that of a British MP's fairly modest salary.

This money enabled Churchill to maintain his huge estate employing around thirty people. Before he was bought by the Jews, Churchill often spoke highly of Hitler and his leadership stating, if ever Germany's fate were to befall Great Britain, he hoped a man of Hitler's caliber would emerge.

In 1936, that changed and he began to warn Britain about the dangers of a re-armed and confident Germany under Hitler and speak of 'Guns before Butter'. No man in History bears greater responsibility for the catastrophe of WW2 than Winston Churchill.


"Irving went on to describe several sources of secret financial support enjoyed by Churchill. In addition to money supplied by the Czech government, Churchill was financed during the "wilderness years" between 1930 and 1939 by a slush fund emanating from a secret pressure group known as the Focus."

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_Okeefe.html
 
Old June 6th, 2011 #43
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Ezra Pound - antiwar, anti-usury - forced hospitalization.

http://foems.multiply.com/journal/it...UND_REALLY_SAY

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezra_Pound#St_Elizabeths
 
Old June 7th, 2011 #44
T.J. McAllister
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 225
T.J. McAllister
Default

In Europe there has been a strange pattern of effective and credible activists dying in vehicle 'accidents'. I don't know if any of these have been conclusively proven to be sabotage - but considering what these men have said and done close to the time of their deaths, there is reason to be suspicious.

Joerg Haider - 2008, car accident ('faulty vehicle' or 'inebriation')
Alexander Scholz Heimattreue Deutsche Jugend-leader- 2008, motorcycle wreck
Uwe Leichsenring NPD politician (called the 'Haider of Saxony') - 2006, car accident
Jürgen Möllemann elected official who criticized criticism of Ariel Sharon - 2003, parachute accident
Ian Stuart Donaldson - 1993, car accident

They'll just kill you if they want to.
 
Old June 7th, 2011 #45
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,174
notmenomore
Default

charles a lindbergh - america 1st committee - kidnap/murder of son
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old June 7th, 2011 #46
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default

"The Uneasy Death of Riad Hamad" (2008)



Hamad, who was originally from Lebanon but had lived in Austin for more than 30 years, taught business education and keyboarding at Small Middle School, was a graduate student at UT (already with several degrees), and was very active in Austin-based charity work aimed at easing living conditions in the occupied territories of Palestine – most specifically via the Palestine Children's Welfare Fund, through which he sold Palestinian crafts to raise funds for destitute Palestinian families.
He was also very outspoken about international politics, objecting strongly to Israeli and U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Partly as a consequence, he had been investigated by federal authorities, who asked questions of some of his neighbors, and in February, the FBI and Internal Revenue Service raided his South Austin home and seized 40 boxes of materials related to his charity work, reportedly pursuant to an investigation of alleged "wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering." Although no charges had been brought, the raid greatly disrupted Hamad's charity work.


"Park-goers who saw the body said the death did not look accidental. They said the man's face was wrapped with duct tape, and his arms appeared to be tied in front of his body."

http://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2008-05-09/621848/
 
Old June 8th, 2011 #47
Mike Parker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
Mike Parker
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
German-American Bund
- nonintervention, ethnic activism - violence, political prosecution.

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p419_Peel.html
 
Old June 8th, 2011 #48
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Jesus Christ - Leader of small anti rabbinical jewish religious movement that evolved into Christian faith aka judaism for gentiles - Crucified
 
Old June 8th, 2011 #49
Ian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cumbria, England
Posts: 1,208
Ian
Default

John the Baptist - spoke out against leading jew Herod and his jewish princess wife Herodias - beheaded, and head on platter to young dancer jewish princess Salome.

 
Old July 6th, 2011 #50
N.M. Valdez
SMASH THE FASH
 
N.M. Valdez's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
N.M. Valdez
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eilert View Post
By the way, cash your welfare check and rent Apocalypto. You might learn something.
I did learn something.

As a Mexica Movement publication put it, "Apocalypto is Gibson’s ignorant and criminal white supremacist vision of Maya civilization. Hitler’s minister of propaganda could not have done a better film to destroy the true beauty of our Maya heritage."

'Apocalypto' a pack of inaccuracies: Maya experts say Gibson's violent film wrong historically

Quote:
By Mark McGuire
NEW YORK TIMES NEWS SERVICE

December 12, 2006

Mel Gibson's historical drama “Apocalypto” certainly has a veneer of authenticity. If you have to scramble to remember your fifth-grade lessons on Maya culture, you'd certainly believe you're watching an accurate, detail-rich depiction of Mesoamerican life.

“A lot of people will think this is how it was,” said Walter Little, an anthropologist and expert on Maya language and culture at the State University of New York at Albany. “Unfortunately.”

Little and two other Mesoamerican scholars at the Albany campus recently screened the big-budget, subtitled epic, which opened Friday and was last weekend's No. 1 movie, grossing $14.2 million.

All three said they were disappointed by the plot and taken aback by the graphic violence, which to these eyes suggested “Braveheart” as directed by Quentin Tarantino in a particularly vile mood.

But even if they could sponge away the blood, these experts found the devil – or at least a set of thumbs-down reviews – in the details.

“This was not a film about the Mayas,” said Robert Carmack, a retired anthropology professor from SUNY Albany's lauded Mesoamerican program. “It's a big mistake – almost a tragedy – that they present this as a Maya film.”

In any genre film, experts and geeks alike will pore over the minutiae. In their estimation, a movie rises or falls on the little things.

Seafaring experts debate the minor gaffes of “Titanic,” while experts on ancient Rome talk about minor historical imperfections in “Gladiator.”

Most moviegoers won't catch these mistakes or willful fact-doctorings. Does it matter to the average ticket holder that Gibson apparently fudged some facts? Not really, especially if you're just looking for a period adventure featuring, by my unofficial count, 12 wildly different modes of killing.

There are no guns, but lots of lethal weapons. To those in the know, however, the flaws stick out like Roseanne Barr in a Broadway musical.

Take the film's depiction of a major Maya city that serves as the setting for much of the film's third act. Many of the architectural details are correct, but they're cobbled together from different locations (including ancient cities in Guatemala and the Yucatan) and different eras, the experts said.

So what, you say? Try picturing 16th-century explorer Giovanni da Verrazano navigating the east coast of the New World, and then ending his journey by traversing the New York City suspension bridge that bears his name.

You get the idea.

The experts said they thought, during much of the movie, it was set sometime between A.D. 300 and 900 – until a closing scene places it closer to the early 1500s.

“It was a postmodern collage,” Little said. “It was a hodgepodge.”

Carmack grew more and more steamed in his post-screening analysis. In particular, he seethed over the portrayals of human sacrifices and other spectacles, which he said more closely resembled practices used by the Aztecs or even the ancient Romans.

The sadism that permeates the movie was simply not part of the culture, the experts said. Yes, the Mayas practiced human sacrifice, but in ways that were highly ritualized and usually involved a single victim. Not pretty, to be sure, but a far cry from the slaughterhouse of mass sacrifice depicted in “Apocalypto” – a virtual conga line of the soon-to-be headless, followed by desecration of their bodies.

The body count was high, and the treatment of the dead cavalier, all three anthropologists said.

The Mayas, an agricultural society, also would not have had an open field of rotting corpses situated near their crops.

Modern-day descendants of the Mayas “would be totally disgusted by this film,” Carmack said. “It was all invented. The ritual was a disgusting perversion of human sacrifices among the Mayas.”

Edgar Martin del Campo, a newly arrived faculty member who begins teaching at SUNY Albany in January, talked about religious glitches and other flaws. Examples: Mayas would not have been awed by an eclipse as they were in the film – they were, in fact, early astronomers. Villagers would not have been dumbstruck by a city; most lived in or around metropolises. The costumes were contrived.

Give the film this, the scholars said: Gibson was brave enough to make the movie in the Yucatec language. But just as the use of Yucatec isn't exactly a guarantee of boffo box office, the historical inaccuracies of Gibson's latest will zoom right by the average viewer. The gore will not.

Gibson's last subtitled period piece, 2004's “The Passion of the Christ,” was an international hit. Even so, that graphic drama drew criticism similar to that already levied against “Apocalypto,” angering many scholars and Jewish leaders for its depiction of Christ's final hours.

“The Passion” was a cultural phenomenon that sparked mainstream debate over the Gospels and the history of anti-Semitism, among other topics. It's doubtful the history behind “Apocalypto” will prompt widespread research by moviegoers – most of whom will be in search of nothing more than two hours of action. Regardless, the experts will be howling. It will be up to you whether to listen.

“The problem is when you misrepresent (a subject to) somebody, they don't always seek out the correct version of things,” Little said. “They're going to accept that as reality. So why would they go search out what it really is?”
Hopefully, you did too, E-liart.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I don't know what the truth is, and have said as much.
 
Old August 16th, 2011 #51
Bernie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,302
Bernie
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T.J. McAllister View Post
In Europe there has been a strange pattern of effective and credible activists dying in vehicle 'accidents'.

Joerg Haider - 2008, car accident ('faulty vehicle' or 'inebriation')
Alexander Scholz Heimattreue Deutsche Jugend-leader- 2008, motorcycle wreck
Uwe Leichsenring NPD politician (called the 'Haider of Saxony') - 2006, car accident
Jürgen Möllemann elected official who criticized criticism of Ariel Sharon - 2003, parachute accident
Ian Stuart Donaldson - 1993, car accident
I would add, Pym Fortuyin Elegant homosexual Dutch political leader, certain to get elected on a 'Holland is Full' ticket. Shot in the head by a 'Lone Nut' around 2005

Anna Lindh Swedish Foreign Minister extremely critical of Israel and likely first Female PM of Sweden. She was shopping unaccompanied in a mall when a 'Lone Nut' sprang at her and using a large hunting knife completely disemboweled the woman, literally carving her gizzard out.

Theodoor van Gogh Anti muslim Dutch film maker stabbed in chest by a 'lone nut' Muslim named Mohammed.

I've been following this for years and am completely convinced there are 'death squads' out there who will knock of anyone who opposes their multicultural agenda and looks like rising to prominence as did all the people on this list. The good thing is the recent riots in Britain have turned hundreds of thousands of people against multiculturalism. That's a tide they cannot stop.
 
Old August 16th, 2011 #52
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,174
notmenomore
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernie View Post
I've been following this for years and am completely convinced there are 'death squads' out there who will knock of anyone who opposes their multicultural agenda and looks like rising to prominence as did all the people on this list. The good thing is the recent riots in Britain have turned hundreds of thousands of people against multiculturalism. That's a tide they cannot stop.
They may not be able to stop the tide, but they sure do seem to be pretty effective at assassinating any leaders. In fact, they seem to be able to discern leaders before the led do, and then act accordingly...
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old August 16th, 2011 #53
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Leonard Rouse
Default



Name:

Rudolf Diesel

Threat:

Research involved petroleum substitutes that circumvented the exploration, refining, and distribution activity of Big Oil, which had already become heavily entwined with European and American governments.

Liquidation:

"Fell overboard" during the night of a North Sea steamship crossing from Antwerp to London, 29 September 1913. No witnesses.
 
Old June 1st, 2012 #54
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

How federal entrapment actually works

by Bill White

The American federal justice system is based upon the principle of entrapment. Federal agents go out looking for individuals they believe are “predisposed” to commit crimes, and then persuade them to conspire to commit new crimes, and arrest them for the conspiracy, resulting in a sentence similar to what they would have received had the committed the actual crime itself. A key to this system is that no actual crime occurs, and that, often, no actual crime was possible – the federal government arrests people for dreams that never come to fruition, and which they usually could never have achieved without the aid of the federal government. Thus, the federal government not only incarcerates a large portion of the US population, but it simultaneously manages to not actually address any real criminal acts in doing so. This system is largely based upon that of the old Soviet Union, where arrests of individuals for crimes of motive and social and economic status took priority over arrests for commissions of real criminal offenses.

Most federal entrapment cases revolve around two things – drugs and guns – products of the “war on drugs” which Ronald Reagan laid the legal foundation for in the mid 1980s. Modern “terrorism” and “murder for hire” cases are largely derived from the “drugs and guns” model and are derivative thereof.

In a federal entrapment, an individual is recruited as an informant for the federal government. This individual is typically someone accused or convicted of federal crimes in the past, though, in political movements where the average member is not involved in crime, they may be relatively bit players who express dissatisfaction with some higher priority federal target. Typically, an individual receives a reduction of one third to one half of their sentence for cooperation with the federal authorities that leads to the arrest of a more valuable target. Individuals not facing federal charges typically receive a salary of $400 - $500 a week, tax-free, plus a cash bonus for every conviction that results from their efforts. In both cases, there is an intense motivation to lie or engage in dishonest or criminal acts to convict the informant’s target. This motivation is shared by the informant’s handlers, who are generally under quotas to produce so many arrests in so long a period, with higher profile arrests being better for agent’s careers. Thus, there is an intense motivation for all parties to target and frame innocent but high profile citizens. Federal agents are typically required to have four informants on their payroll and encourage to have at least ten on their payroll at any given time. When one calculates all of the federal agents and agencies involved in such a program, as much as one out of every one hundred adults in the United States is employed creating crimes for the benefit of the US federal government.

The informant is then told to find a victim – a person who will be implicated and arrested for breaking a federal law. Higher profile victims are preferred, and innocence is not a defense against entrapment. Federal law requires that federal agents show that there was a “propensity” to commit a crime, but it has been found that “propensity” to commit a major drug trafficking offense can consist of having once smoked marijuana, and that “propensity” to commit an act of terrorism can consist of having once spoken angrily about the government. Thus the “propensity” requirement is really no requirement at all – if all us fails, the informant merely has to claim that they heard an angry statement, and an entire “murder for hire” frame up can be justified. The federal courts have also ruled that the unsupported testimony of a single witness can be sufficient evidence to prove an issue beyond a reasonable doubt, never mind provide reasonable cause to initiate an investigation

In a federal sting, the informant will typically approach an individual and ask them to commit a crime. Federal law requires that a conspiracy involve two or more people who are not federal agents, but the federal government evades this requirement, when necessary, with solicitation, aid, and attempt laws. Solicitation statutes often don’t apply, because they require the targeted party to solicit the crime, when the federal government is generally the party suggesting the crime. However, the Courts have found that the federal government can suggest a crime and the party they suggest it to can still “solicit” it by agreeing that it should occur – particularly if the federal agent pretends to have “cold feet” or to withdraw. Aid to terrorism laws (different from “aiding and abetting”) require that an individual intend to provide “material assistance” to terrorism; examples of “material assistance” include things as minor as sharing “terrorist” literature on the internet or working as the criminal attorney for an individual accused of “terrorism”. Attempt laws are utilized when a targeted individual insists on being “lone wolf”, and involve a more complex type of FBI operation, in which materials for an attempt often have to be provided without any real danger being created.

Federal sting operations tend to be stereotyped, and are run according to operations manuals provided by the FBI. For instance, in Chicago, Illinois, a popular type of DEA sting involves “robbing a stash house.” An individual involved in drugs is approached and asked to participate in robbing a stash house – though the stash house and the drugs do not exist. Once an agreement is reached, the targeted individual is asked to bring others into the agreement, and a small “crew” is formed. The amount of drugs at the stash house is talked up from perhaps one kilo to begin with to thirty; the effect of this is to increase the sentencing guidelines from five to thirty years. These targeted individuals are told to meet at the wildlife preserve just south of Chicago, where they are ambushed by federal agents and arrested. Six to ten individuals in two groups are typically arrested in this manner every week by federal agents.

The individuals targeted for this kind of sting are generally poor drug addicts. Often, they will appear on the related videotapes obviously high on cocaine as they are walked through the arrest process by the agents and informants. Most would never have had access to thirty kilos of cocaine outside of the federal sting; all are treated in the press as major drug traffickers and as evidence of the effectiveness of the government’s war on drugs.

During a federal string, every effort is generally made to eliminate the potential for violence or injury. The federal government has sometimes spectacularly failed in this regard, and has sometimes authorized political violence, such as the Oklahoma City bombing or the attempted bombing of Cyndi Steele. In general, though, the federal government tries to minimize the threat to their own agents and to the general public, because such violence reflects negatively on federal operations. The primary means by which the federal government effects this is through the maintenance of control over the operation at every level – their informants become intimately involved in the operation and are present at every major development in it to prevent anything outside of the script from occurring.

For instance, federal informants will generally not provide loaded or even functional weapons to targets. In many cases, federal informants do provide guns, bombs or missiles to targeted individuals; in all cases, these are non-functional items. If targeted individuals simply tested or demanded a demonstration of the weapons they were buying, a majority of federal terrorism “attempt” cases would be short circuited. When targets provide their own weapons, the federal informants will work to separate the target from the weapon; a typical ploy is to suggest that all weapons be placed in the trunk of a car or in a separate vehicle from the one the targets are travelling in. A good way to delay or short circuit a federal arrest is to carry a loaded weapon on one’s person – though flash bangs and similar devices are typically used when federal agents believe they have lost control of a weapon during a frame up.

Federal informants also do not provide useful information to targets. Most federal law enforcement officials live in terror of their home address being published on the internet; one cannot underestimate the personal cowardice of the men and women who serve in the federal judiciary and in the federal law enforcement agencies. Federal agents never provide accurate personal information on federal officials to targeted victims, and, if they provide inaccurate information, it will be the address of a public building or phone number – not an incorrect residence. Just as with weapons, if most targets of federal stings attempted to validate the information they were receiving, they would not be in prison today. Federal stings tend to catch people who are careless and excessively trusting, which is why they tend not to catch the individuals actually operating criminal enterprises.

The federal government will, within political groups, attempt to incite violence, but this violence will always be vague and directed towards public buildings and public targets – not towards individuals. It is also always the kind of violence that an individual requires assistance to commit – the feds will not tell an individual to go and get a gun and shoot up a building, first, because the sentencing guidelines for shootings are lower than for explosives, but, second, because that is something an individual could potentially do without the assistance of the federal agents. Better to lead the target down a route where they are dependent on the agents than down a route where they could “go rogue” and commit an act on their own.

Federal sting operations also direct their targets towards means of communication that can be monitored and in which both parties can be definitely identified. For instance, telephones, particularly cellular telephones, are utilized for ease of recording and because the GPS devices in telephones definitely identify the location of a party. Credit cards are preferred for purchases, when possible, because they provide identity information on the purchaser – though cash, particularly counterfeit cash, is utilized when the recipient is a federal agent. (An example is a federal missile terrorism sting, in which the target was told that the cost of the missile he wanted to fire at a federal building was $75,000, and the target was encouraged to counterfeit funds with a Xerox machine to purchase the missile – adding eighty years to his sentence). Federal agents also like to meet in person and utilize a device that generally looks like a car-lock clicker to record what happens. The federal government attempts to put as much of their operation as possible on record – and thus they will avoid things like anonymized internet as a means of communication.

To ease concerns about communication monitoring, the federal government will generally use a stereotyped set of code words suggested by their informants. In murder for hire cases, the murder is often referred to as “painting the house.” In drug case, a kilo of drugs may be referred to as a “CD”, a “leather jacket” or a “car rim”. The same phrases and techniques are typically used and reused in these cases, as the men arrested are generally incarcerated so long that they are not able to share information on how they are arrested with others, and thus the general population remains ignorant of what is occurring.

In evaluating whether or not someone is approaching you is an informant, one should be observant. If the individual is asking you to join them in committing a crime, you should ask yourself, “why is this person asking me to commit a crime?” If you are not someone already engaged in violent crime, it is unlikely that someone you do not know would approach you and ask you to commit a crime. If you are the leader of a political group not engaged in criminal acts, it is rare that someone who is not a federal informant would ask you to commit a crime. As mafia members will tell you, a general rule of criminal acts is not to work with someone you don’t know – and you should know who they are, where they live, who their family is, how they earn a living, and all of the details before even entertaining a criminal proposal from them.

If one is aware of federal law and particularly federal sentencing guidelines, federal informants become easier to spot. Most federal informants, once they have their hooks in a target, will attempt to talk a case up directly along the federal sentencing guidelines – increasing drug and money amounts or changing the underlying offense to make the crime more serious. For instance, thirty kilos of “ghost coke” maxes out a drug sentence as a thirty year mandatory minimum; bombing an occupied building carries a thirty five year mandatory minimum bombing an unoccupied building or a public area carries less. If what the person approaching you for the crime is walking you through the sentencing guidelines, they are an informant.

But the best way to be safe is to simply stay in control of your actions yourself. If you are going to commit a crime, be the person directing it, or at least directing your role in it. Real criminals try to avoid meeting in large groups to plan crimes; the person directing the activity meets with each member individually. Preferably, the participants approach and leave the target area individually, meeting only during the commission of the crime. Real criminals do not place their weapons in the trunk of a car; they have no weapon, or they have a weapon ready for use. If you are not a real criminal, consider whether it is a line of work really suited for you – for many, it is not.
 
Old June 21st, 2012 #55
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Parker View Post
Ezra Pound was no fool. A great mind attacking the jewish problem.

http://www.whale.to/b/pound.html
 
Old November 12th, 2012 #56
AlexanderHaynes
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 106
AlexanderHaynes
Default

Rudolf Hess --- NSDAP --- Broken physically and mentally by MI5 agents and psychiatrists, imprisoned for life on invented evidence to prevent him from talking, garrot murder by four SIS agents framed as suicide

Source: David Irving, Wolf-Rudiger Hess (son)

Heinrich Himmler --- NSDAP --- Lured into an abandoned house by two SIS agents as he thought he was going to negotiate with Montgomery, murder framed as suicide

Source: David Irving

Feel free to continue documenting the use of extrajudicial executions by Western democracies.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.
Page generated in 0.15280 seconds.