Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 6th, 2012 #41
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thor View Post
Old as it may be, this is probably the most enlightening thread I've read on this forum. Mr. Linder, I salute you.
You're welcome.

The way I indicate is counterintuitive, yes. But it's the right way.

Lift and separate, as the old bra commercial had it: lift and separate the
beautiful, firm White tit from the saggy, ununderwired bra of conservatism.
 
Old April 7th, 2012 #42
Trevor Dermott
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 326
Trevor Dermott
Default

The recent kerfuffle concerning Derbyshire bolsters the argument:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...0125&ref=media

Looks like Derb went a little too far dispensing what ought to be common sense. A bit of liberal shrieking from places like gawker and huffpo caused the faggots at NRO to buckle and fire him.

All that jew-truckling didn't save Derb's job in the end. Conservatives simply do not have what it takes.
 
Old April 17th, 2012 #43
Thor
Junior Member
 
Thor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 189
Thor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post

I am going to write an essay on the mistaken concept of 'gateways' at some point. A lot of people are hung up on that point. It's a version of the cock crows before the sunrise, therefore his crowing causes the sunrise. Fallacy.
Speaking from a personal--and therefore non-encompassing--experience, I can say that there is no conservative gateway to white nationalism. I'm sure most here, myself included, were ordinary conservatives before we became WN, but, as you say, that doesn't necessarily mean one creates the other.

One day I just googled "zionist media" and read Pierce's "Who Rules America?". At that point, I had no idea of the massive crisis in Europe regarding demographics, so everything started to hit pretty hard soon after. There were no conservative voices that had a message to inspire me to go and look for those facts.

Linder, did you ever write the essay concerning gateways? I will search for it.
 
Old July 17th, 2013 #44
Leonard Rouse
Celebrating My Diversity
 
Leonard Rouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: With The Creepy-Ass Crackahs
Posts: 8,156
Leonard Rouse
Default

Bump due to Derek Black's recent public, SPLC-facilitated crimethink confession.

The 'big tent' (little integrity) model of White politics is a laughable failure. Or, to paraphrase Mr. Miyagi, when you walk down the middle of the road, you get squish, like grape.

 
Old September 8th, 2013 #45
Jewish Jelly
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 27
Default

Of course morons like Alex and others on this site consider homosexuality to be immoral, yet think that "moral high ground" is stupid, which demonstrates real morality in the definition of the word. Typical hypocrisy from sub-human downies.
 
Old September 8th, 2013 #46
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Alexander M.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Jelly View Post
Of course morons like Alex and others on this site consider homosexuality to be immoral, yet think that "moral high ground" is stupid, which demonstrates real morality in the definition of the word. Typical hypocrisy from sub-human downies.
So you join the forum this month and this is what you are made of ?

Your the next contestant on the popular game show "SWITCH"

Stick any finger in your ass with your right hand and stick any finger in your mouth with the left hand and just "SWITCH"

We have a winner.
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old September 11th, 2013 #47
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jewish Jelly View Post
Of course morons like Alex and others on this site consider homosexuality to be immoral, yet think that "moral high ground" is stupid, which demonstrates real morality in the definition of the word. Typical hypocrisy from sub-human downies.
I don't know which idiot you are come back here to moronicize but I don't know that I've ever called homoism immoral, except possibly as a bit of rhetoric amid more pointed attacks.

Calling stuff moral or immoral is for retards - religious retards. Nature knows no morality. It's just something humans came up with. Unavoidable, true, and useful to an extent, but real in any other sense - absolutely not.

What I say about queerness is that it's morbid - diseased. It comes from people who are fucked in the head. They are dangerous to themselves, to others, and to normal children. Therefore at best they can be tolerated in the closet. If they try to go public, they need to be put down.

As for "moral high ground' that is purely a function of who's controlling the mass media. As I've said 1000 times.

The only people who believe in "moral high ground" are conservative queers who conceive politics as some kind of game in which God blows the whistle on the bad guys and rewards the good guys. Of course this never happens, but if they paid attention to political reality, they wouldn't be conservatives. And faggots like you never pay attention either. Homosexuality has been considered immoral from day one in the US. Today, large percentage of the public think it's just fine, something good even. How did that happen if morality is absolute and unchanging? It happened as the result of a deliberate normalization strategy pursued by jews and homos in the mass media. Therefore, as I already stated, 'moral high ground' is a function of control of the loudspeakers. When you're behind them, morality is whatever you scream into them. When you're in front of them, morality is whatever you hear repeated the loudest and longest. Only religious nitwits who never hold power and have no idea how to get it think otherwise. And these spirit-queers are afraid to actually get in the ring, to observe and act based on reality, so they posit a non-existent afterlife in which their imaginary god will vindicate their position.

What could be more pathetic than that?

Christians really are queers of the spirit, and in a very real way, more destructive than queers of the flesh.
 
Old September 15th, 2013 #48
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,433
Crowe
Default

Conservatives represent the largest portion of Whites who support and worship Jews. They are eating up everything Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh are feeding them. Its a far more dangerous ideology than Liberalism. Why? Because its the ideology that is directly targeted toward corrupting straight White males.
 
Old September 17th, 2013 #49
albert999
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1,536
Default brilliant

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
[The following is from a different thread. It presents the case for treating conservatives as the other liberals - attacking them as our enemies since they have all, down to the last one, sold out or truckled under to the dominant jew.]



Other than balls, a gelding's not that different from a stallion.



Slow your roll, nigger, and just think about how stupid the above statement is.



So, to you, cowardice is acceptable in your political analyst or representative. Do you feel that way about your doctor, too? Do you go to a doctor who knows the disease you're suffering from, but withholds the diagnosis and cure from you?


I would think you were baiting me if I didn't know that dimness is about 95% likelier. I just got done writing the answer to that question. Ok, let me give it to you in the simplest words I can, Special Ed.

Yes. The rise of nationalism is almost a mathematical function of the decline of conservatism.

I'll now slightly expand that answer.

Ordinary people, not all that different from you, are not real swift. They can barely distinguish the ground from the sky. Pat Buchanan is enough like us that it confuses people. The same can be said for all conservatives: they favor some of the same things we do (basically, acting normally - respect for the respectable in everyday life), which makes them, the conservatives, a plausible opponent to the weirdos of the left. Do you understand the implications that flow, for our position, from the fact that tens of millions of people believe that by supporting 'the right' they can effect the kind of political change we need to get back to Normal White America? If they think the solution lies within the system, i.e., through supporting one or other of the people/parties they see on tv/in the papers, then why the heck would they ever bother about us? I want you to take ten or fifteen days, however much time you need, to digest this point:

IF BUCHANAN CAN GET THE JOB DONE, WHY THE HECK DOES THE PUBLIC NEED US?


Now, if the public doesn't need Buchanan, because he can't get the job done...then the next epiphany is that Buchanan is an obstacle to the public seeing us, and pondering our case, and realizing that we alone, we White Nationalists, have what is needed to get the job done. Buchanan and his ilk are...in the way. He is on tv and in the papers daily. Our people are not. He's close enough to our position, plausible enough a representative of normal-white interests, that masses of people, dim by nature, tired by overwork, just might be fooled by him. God knows they always have been. And that's how we've ended up where we are. Now, Buchanan has no reason to change: his shtik and spiel have made him rich. WE ARE THE ONES WHO MUST CHANGE. So I don't want to hear any shit about how I'm wrong in attacking little Catholic Patsy. Attacking conservatives as cowards and weaklings is precisely what we need. It is tactically even more important than attacking liberals, because the people we want already hate them, and their power is merely a function of their support for the jews' agenda. We can't polarize the public between Whites and jews until conservatives, the have-it-both-ways people, are roadkilled and dragged off on the shoulder. Only then does the political Chicken, begin...

Knocking Pat off the air is like knocking the flowers off a Pasadena New Year's float. It shows the ugly chicken wire cage of jewish totalitarianism beneath the pretty colors and designs and smiling waving chesties. It reveals to the public what's actually going on: naked jewish tyranny. No one who disagrees with the jews in any way is allowed face or sheet time in AmeriKwa. That awakening is good for our side. It is necessary. Pat Buchanan and other seemingly rational conservative geldings on tv and in the papers hurts our side, because they make it look like the system is open. For the mass of people, none to bright to begin with, and tired from work, can't make out the difference. They don't spend all day on the Internet studying politics. They're working. They need things gross and crude, otherwise they're going to be fooled by polished professionals like Pat. But if he doesn't have the answers we need as a race, then it is in our interest that he be knocked off tv, because he can only mislead people as to the cause of our decline.

I'm pleonasming my ass off, but I really don't think you dimwits won't benefit from overbludgeoning. So just read more and think a little, or wave your feelers, or whatever you do to receive sensory input.

To repeat:

Ordinary dimwits cannot distinguish the White Nationalist position from the conservative position, since our side is kept off tv by the jews.

In order to make our presence known, we have to KNOCK THE CONSERVATIVES OUT OF THE WAY. The fact that they somewhat look like us, and that some of our policies overlap (anti-queer, anti-feminist, pro-borders, etc.) does not mean they are on our side. They are in fact spittingly hostile to us. They call us kooks, loons, crazies, basement dwellers - in short, there is no term of abuse used by the commie-jew-left against us that is not also used by the commie-jew-controlled-right. That ought to be a lesson to you dimwits, but, being tepid namby-pambies like 99% of white males, you just smooth over the differences like a wife who doesn't want to make trouble. We'll find a way to muddle through somehow, just pretend that we all get along, that we're all on the same side. Even though we're not, and it only helps the already rich and cowardly pretenders called conservatives who look down on us and do all they can to destroy our school and reputations to preserve their status as the real outsiders and alternative to the judeo-System. Nah, just pretend. "It's better that way," as the wigger in the Offspring song sings. Better to be a big fat stupid undiscriminating barren pussy like Starr or her cat than to stand up for yourself, your school, your leaders, your principles, your race. If you think Pat Buchanan is a good guy, and helping our cause, you are not a White Nationalist.

White nationalists have nearly as much difficulty as the average joe in understanding what's going on in politics because:

a) they are nearly as dim-witted as pro wrestling fans;

b) they have never seen professional conservatism from the inside, so they think it is something other than "a game; a way of making a living," as Joe Sobran called it.

Wise up, idiots. Pat Buchanan is not interested in standing up for you, he's interested in getting into your wallet. WN Buchanan fans are the exact equivalent of a chick who thinks a guy really likes her when in fact he just wants sex. Pat's interested in you watching him on tv and thinking he stands for the change you want. He isn't, but if he can put on a good enough show to fool you, he's got your money. And he knows you're stupid. He knows, as he would put it, hard-core WN have "nowhere else to go." No one else on tv even pretends to be right wing. That makes him the it girl. And until WN scorn him and demand better, he's right. Again, if you support Buchanan, you are a conservative, not a White nationalist.

Fuck the Kwanservatives, we're the Sex Pistols

What our White Nationalist cause needs to do to succeed is to polarize the nation between jews and White Nationalists. That means, in tardspeak, that the average dolt, let's call him Special Mark, the guy who reads the paper for twenty minutes before dinner, must perceive that there are two competing visions out there, between which he can choose:

1) the judeo-System - the debt-sex-vice-sports-multicult vision

2) the White Nationalist system - a White nation without jews, muds or neo-morals

Polarizing the public between these positions is a tall order. It means destroying the dominant conceptual framework as it exists now: with false option A (liberals/Democrats) and false option B (conservatives/Republicans). Ordinary people cannot make out, without help, that there is not a dime's worth of difference between right and left, they are two puppets pulled over the filthy claws of the eagle-nosed kike who actually runs things and makes all the decisions. It is our job to expose, reveal, destroy. Part of that revelation is beating the living hell out of the conservatives until ordinary people perceive them as the weaklings, laughingstocks, and System tools they are.

In practical terms, polarization entails demonizing and attacking the RIGHT, THE CONSERVATIVES, the PALEOCONSERVATIVES even more than the left-liberal-PC-communists. We should not only attack the fake right, the false opposition, we should attack them with joy and relish. Laughter indicates the laugher is or feels superior to the target. That's exactly the meta-message the winning politician must communicate - that he is stronger than his opponent. That he is the bull goose in the pen. That is a lesson the conservative never understands, which is why he is always fighting uphill. Footnoting is for cowards and folks who don't get it. At best it's fill-in stuff. No footnote ever won a political battle. A political battle is just the human version of that nature channel perennial: the battle between bulls for mating rights. Bluffing is involved, and laughing is essential to bluffing, as ridicule can destroy anything. Anyone preferring reasoned discourse over laughter, if not an actual academic, to whom foonoting is proper, is very likely a coward or a dullard. We beat the jews by laughing at them and fighting them. Laughter is the proper means of verbal warfare. Not "proving" things. Not footnoting. Not remonstrating. Not being polite and respectful. Not playing along with appearances. Not not doubting motives. All those are for weaklings, for losers, for conservatives. We are not they. "I'm not like you [Kwanservative] Charlie Brown [with your fulsome MLKommie praise, your love of diversity, your pathetic and ineffectual puling], I have to win sometimes." We White Nationalists are lions. Well, we're cubs who might become lions if we act right. The conservatives are dung beetles. After the jews have eaten the wildebeest and pooped out the remains, the Pat Buchanans of "It's Pat" fame crinkle by on their six little feet, and roll up the salubrious balls of dung on which they subsist. Do you want to be a lion or a dung beetle, White man?

If you agree there are things a grown man, a political analyst, can't say, you are giving your seal of approval to the cowardice that is putting our race in the ground. You hurt our cause and you are not welcome at VNNForum. White nationalism has a higher standard than you are able to meet.

The conservatives, including Pat Buchanan, must be destroyed, run off, hounded into irrelevancy, so that the people can see that we, not he and his febrile faileocons, are the REAL alternative to the evil jews producing The System Show.

I really have been impressed these last few months at the childlike cluelessness of so many who think they are WN. The typical WN thinks he is displaying his sophistication when he makes excuses for why this or that kahnster dung beetle can't say this or that.

Let me tell you, men of gerbil: You're not sophisticated. You're stupid dupes and dullards. You think Buchanan is really putting one over on the dominant kikes, and you're right. He is putting one over. Not on the kikes. On you.

I have worked in these offices. I have taken the calls from liberal talking head A asking if conservative talkie B wants to go out for drinks after work. These guys are all buddies. They live the good life by putting on a Punch and Judy show for the mass morons like you. Some of the leftists might be honest about what they believe, since they can say EVERYTHING they want, qualified only by tactical advisability. But none of the rightists are anything but tools, except for the jewish neocons, who root and jew about with freedom, as they are kikes. As John Derbyshire at least had the courage to admit, everything he writes is conditioned by his fear of jews. If he displeases them, he has no job. Men who accept employment as political writers/analysts on terms that require them to relinquish their manhood and their independent judgment are unworthy of respect or subsidy. They are, rather, to be despised and spit on as weaklings. If you don't agree with this statement, you are not a white nationalist. You are a conservative. Cowardice at no time in White history has been acceptable in a political leader. That is a horrid and disgusting innovation of the 20th century. Reject it.

Now is the first time in history that White men, almost across the board, willingly agreed to sacrifice their honor and their independence for a paycheck. Pat Buchanan and the rest of the paleocons are house eunuchs waving palm fronds for the Pet pashas who employ them. A white nationalist who praises Pat Buchanan and makes excuses for him is seen by me, and by Pat himself, as a fool. A man with no self respect has no respect for others too stupid to see him for what he is. Pat Buchanan knows how to wink and nod at WN in order to suck our money. And too many of you idiots think he's helping us rather than helping himself by using us.

Pat Buchanan is dangerous to our cause because of his virtues - his learning and his political knowledge. He knows precisely how to affect that he is one of us. He know that hinting that he stands for all that is white and good is the way to fill his coffers. He also knows that that is his role within the jewish system. You have to give a little to get a little, the jewish tyrant knows. Pat is that giving a little. To maintain the fiction of an open system, there have to be at least a few people who appear, and appear plausibly, to oppose the powers that be. Pat Buchanan is precisely that man. As a good little Irish Catholic, PB always runs cringing and whimpering back to Authority, because that is his nature, and that is how he was raised and trained. Religious folks like PB have no problem with shitty, self-interested behavior as long as the dirt is done in private, and the facade kept up in public. The idea of saying the same thing in private as you do in public is foreign to the Christian, as is any ideal of manliness. Christianity is a shabby thing.

The White fool imagines that Buchanan aids our cause. The reality is that our cause aids Buchanan. Buchanan never says a word about White dispossession. He never says a word about jews controlling our government. He openly advised the Republicans to undercut the most successful White political candidate of the last 25 years, David Duke. Buchanan is a team player, and a System dolly all the way to the bank. WN is a cause that he can watch and steal the best arguments from, without crediting the men who thought them up - the revisionists now languishing in jail, for example. That way he can maximize his support base and shine up his radical veneer while staying safe with the jews. Most people, as I started and will end with, can't make out a clever, well written conservative position coming from the pen of someone like Buchanan from a genuine white nationalist position. It is in our interest that we do everything possible to help them, and that surely and necessarily entails attacking and destroying Pat Buchanan. If you don't agree with that position, you are not one of us. You are a conservative. Anything that obscures the difference between White nationalism and conservatism is detrimental to our cause.

Politics is a zero-sum game. Money and time that go to Pat Buchanan and the faileocons are money and attention that do not go to White nationalists. Any so-called WN who praises Buchanan and encourages us to support him is objectively damaging our cause - by aiding men who already possess tremendous material (money and tv access) advantages over us. Not to mention men who, whenver the question is put to them directly, denounce us.

Accept nothing but the real thing, White men.

Raise your standards.

Pat Buchanan is our competitor.

Pat Buchanan is our enemy.
Just brilliant, you explained this much better then David Duke, finally I can understand WHY? And copy and paste this to explain to others.
 
Old September 17th, 2013 #50
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Conservatives represent the largest portion of Whites who support and worship Jews. They are eating up everything Fox News, Glenn Beck, and Rush Limbaugh are feeding them. Its a far more dangerous ideology than Liberalism. Why? Because its the ideology that is directly targeted toward corrupting straight White males.
Rush Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly , etc.;their job is to be ready to lead the kwanservatives back to their chains while they are being systematically disarmed at the behest of the Jew.
 
Old December 19th, 2013 #51
Alexander M.
Senior Member
 
Alexander M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
Alexander M.
Default Let it Burn: The Conservative Blogosphere's Penchant for Impotent Observation

Matt, Glenn, and Ace will just go on typing every day, complaining about what is and what isn't. They'll do their insect work of impotently chronicling the texture of the encroaching chaos, but without analysing its structure and pointing out the obvious solutions. They and theirs will continue doing this right up until the moment the power goes out and the darkness is broken only by the fires of doom.

http://alternativeright.com/blog/cat...nt-observation
__________________
Experience molds perception.
 
Old August 10th, 2015 #52
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Sean Gruber
Default Trump as club

http://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=1891180&postcount=30
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old November 23rd, 2016 #53
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
RickHolland
Default

__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Reply

Tags
conservatism, faileoconservative, false opposition, patriotards, strategy

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:39 AM.
Page generated in 0.14388 seconds.