|
October 18th, 2014 | #161 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
Codreanu - some of his boys turned themselves in after an action knowing they'd be killed and tortured. And they were. Codreanu's attitude is not correct, either, altho often cited by WN. You could have a healthy christian society, and jews will prosper in it, and be able to split it apart. Perhaps this is what you're saying. Why? Because christianity contains no principle against judaism. Nor anything to safeguard white-racialness. that tells me, but not codreanu that xtianity and racialism dont go together. Why try to square a circle? It wastes your time and annoys the circle. |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #162 |
Administrator
|
I think the only reason jews didnt appear to dominate in early centuries the way they do now is that the technology to leverage their power didn't exist.
I have never seen anyone address that point; to me it's obvious. As god is my witness, i have been intellectually honest and addressed every xtian argument i could find, and beaten them all down, best i can tell. Last edited by Alex Linder; October 18th, 2014 at 01:57 AM. |
October 18th, 2014 | #163 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
October 18th, 2014 | #164 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
A society based on agriculture and barter, where the ultimate power belongs to the warrior, has very little place for Jews. When trade over long distances develops and money comes into use, and power shifts to whoever happens to have the most money, then a society is ripe to be infested and taken over by Jews. Adams refers to Rothschild in his last chapter. An important reason why Germany reacted against plutocracy and the Jews as they did is that they made the transition from agriculture to international trade so late and therefore so quickly that they were aware of its effects, and in their mentality they hadn't entirely made the transition from Spiritual Man to Economic Man.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; October 18th, 2014 at 01:37 AM. |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #166 | |||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
He's a liar. That's what you'd concede if you didn't like him. I guess I'll have to step in for you here. Give me your cape. Now...I am Truthman. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
October 18th, 2014 | #167 | |||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So really it comes to: 1) who wants to live in whites-only society? 2) how do we achieve that politically? once we do 3) how do we protect it in perpetuity? 4) how do we arrange things to live among ourselves, for the everyday stuff? I've answered all these. Not to the depth eventually will, but enough to evoke a strategy that can be argued. Last edited by Alex Linder; October 18th, 2014 at 02:14 AM. |
|||
October 18th, 2014 | #168 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
Quote:
Hey Gandalf, the majority of people in Spanish speaking America are not "mestizos", they are overwhelmingly Amerindian. There are some regions with more mixed-race people, like say, Colombia, but most places like Mexico, all of Central America except Costa Rica, Bolivia, Equador, Peru, etc are just indians who speak Spanish. The Iberian colonial experience was not that different from secular states like Britain or the Netherlands. British had America and Australia, but the Iberians had the equivalent of Argentina and Uruguay. People like you never mention the teeming mass of mongrels the British left behind in the Carribean, all over Africa (especially South Africa), and the West Indies. Miscegenation was very common in the British Raj until the mid 19th century when women started accompanying their husbands-it should be notable that the majority of Spanish colonies in the America's were independent by the mid 19th century. Nor do they mention a bizarre experiment like Guyana, where the average person is 1/4 dot-Indian, 1/4 feather Indian, 1/4 Negro, and 1/4 white A significant percentage of people in Holland have some Indonesian ancestry, yet people like you dismiss that and keep quoting "The Black Man's Gift To Portugal" as fact. The Spanish in the Americas had, as you showed, a race-based caste system that was a carbon copy of what Anglos had in North America. In case you didn't know, Jews of race (conversos) were very much present as parasites accompanying those who were discovering and conquering the America's, including in North America.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #169 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,778
|
What does Jew Alex of the Whiteness project feel about the White race?
http://whitenessproject.org/checkbox/alex How about Jewess Shayna? http://whitenessproject.org/checkbox/shayna "I feel very uncomfortable when it's only white people in the room"- Solves the "puzzling" question Jared Taylor asks himself as to why Jews would want to import more non-whites and mix the races, even if it means the whole country becomes a third world cesspool.
__________________
"The favorite slogan of the reds is: 'No Pasarán!: Yes we have passed! And we tell them...and we tell them, we will pass again!'" ― Benito Mussolini after the Communist capitulation in Barcelona Last edited by Joe_Smith; October 18th, 2014 at 04:13 AM. |
October 18th, 2014 | #170 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,247
|
Quote:
You haven't shown the slightest evidence that Taylor is in any way the cause of what Greggy does. You did the same stuff back when Greggy wrote his idiotic "Dealing with the Holocaust" essay. Jared Taylor must be the cause of this! How? How in hell was there any demonstrable connection between Jared Taylor and Greg Johnson's telling people that they must accept the Holohoax? Taylor, so far as I know, has never had anything to say about the Holohoax. The way you want to blame Taylor for everything, when there is no evidence to support it, is nuts. I don't think you can show that Taylor is harming anything with his own activities either. Since Taylor's audience is conservatives, the notion that Taylor is curbing some latent anti-Jew tendency among those conservatives surely has little to no substance. I don't know if you were aware of this, but the conservative media that these people listen to most of the time is stridently pro-Jew. Turn on an AM radio sometime if you didn't know that. Tune to a conservative talk station and listen. Or watch a little bit of Fox News. It would be hard for Taylor to buck that and still even be able to talk to the vast majority of those people. At least he bolsters their healthy tendencies on some racial issues. Taylor is only doing half the job, but a half-full glass is not something to curse. And I am sure that it is possible to build on what Taylor is doing, but it takes patience. Throwing rocks at the teacher in the racial kindergarten is not going to make the students in the racial kindergarten want to advance to your level faster. On the contrary, it will just convince them that you older kids are very bad people.
__________________
Anti-Nazi is a codeword for anti-White. www.national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com www.noncounterproductive.blogspot.com www.williamlutherpierce.blogspot.com Last edited by Hadding; October 18th, 2014 at 04:23 AM. |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #171 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Armorica
Posts: 36
|
Here is a table chart of the American WN scene according to Greg Johnson and others :
-------------------------- Vulgar retards ------- Refined intellectuals --- Wholesome church picnickers Vanguard Elite -------- Anglin & Ransdell ----- Greg Johnson (true to principles) Mainstream ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tea Party (not true to principles) Halfway equivocators ------------------------------------------------------- Hunter Wallace (name the Jew only once in a while) |
October 18th, 2014 | #172 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Armorica
Posts: 36
|
The vanguard/mainstream distinction is ambiguous:
Vanguard = radical? small elite? intellectual? explicit? Mainstream = watered down? big masses? low brow? implicit? On the one hand, you have normal, wholesome, slightly stupid masses of White people who think no harm, don't know anything about the Jew, and simply want to go on living their peaceful lives as White people. On the other hand, you have the vanguardists who stick out as sore thumbs in the general population. And each time a man of the people becomes aware of ZOG, he stops being mainstream and becomes a vanguardist, and can be described as somewhat removed from normal White people. Such an analysis of the situation means that you refuse the idea that normal White people can have any political leaders to represent them. So, I think the vanguard/mainstream distinction is artificial and can be counterproductive. The real distinction should be between people who know about the Jew, and those who don't know yet, but will soon learn all about it thanks to our diligent efforts. In his essay titled "Vanguardism, Vantardism, and Mainstreaming", Greg Johnson says that "our movement should aim to recruit Whites of all social classes who are above average in intelligence, virtue, and taste". I would simply say that we need to unite all Whites who stand against race-replacement. Resisting our collective destruction by racial replacement is a sign of intelligence and moral strength. But we see a lot of smart and moral people who cannot resist the pressure of conformism as well as the pressure of government and media intimidation. They lack the courage and independence of mind. That is where the style of communication used by Anglin, Ransdell, and also Kyle Hunt, can be very useful and persuasive. It will not only work with half-witted proletarians. In fact, those three guys do much more than use words like kike and nigger, they rely a lot on logic and reason, like most opponents to the Jews. Their particular style can appeal to all kinds of people. The Jews, by comparison, completely ignore logic and reason, and are nevertheless able to sway intelligent people, thanks to their control of government and the media. |
October 18th, 2014 | #173 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Armorica
Posts: 36
|
Quote:
Today, thanks to the work of the revisionists, the Jewish story seems to be that the holocaust of the Jews by the Germans was a secret operation. That is supposed to explain why no shred of evidence was left. If so, it is wrong to blame the Germans and National Socialism for what was secretly done by only a handful of them. It amounts to racial defamation. Killing Jews was not consubstantial to National Socialism. For example, when you see old pictures of German crowds acclaiming Hitler, you know their enthusiasm had nothing to do with killing Jews. By comparison, the mass murders committed by the Jews in the USSR were not secret operations carried out by a tiny minority of Jews, and they were documented in a number of Western newspapers at the time. The Jews in the West knew about it and still supported their murderous cousins in the East. And the Jewish participation in the mass murder was not a top down operation. They were not simply obeying orders. -- About Greg Johnson: what doesn't make sense is that he seems to think it is possible to defend aspects of National Socialism without first debunking the holocaust story. |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #174 | |
Switching to glide
|
Quote:
Here in America, I know the arguments. That symbols don't matter, that you can get people to rally under any symbol, including the swastika. I don't disagree. You can get a large majority of the white population to do/say/believe just about anything if you have the power that comes with mass propaganda that starts very early in life. White children today are nothing other than flat-out indoctrinated by the public (and private) educational system in 2014. Brainwashed is another word you could use. Examples abound. They're documented all over the forum. A group could adopt every single principle of National Socialism but call their system something else, use different symbols and they would have a much easier time getting through initially without the Pavlovian response National Socialism and its symbols engender from a good portion of the white population, at least at this time. In 25 years, after everyone connected to WWII in any capacity is long dead, the "Bad boy" image that has been used to portray National Socialist since roughly 1939 might actually be an asset.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #175 |
Senior Member
|
Beefs Five: The Saga Continues
Posted on October 18, 2014 by Hunter Wallace Alex Linder vs. Brad Griffin Editor’s Note: Unlike Alex Linder, who is an internet personality with a forum and a podcast, I am actually an organizer. In fact, I am getting on the road to go to an event right now, although I won’t be in Georgia where we have another event going on tomorrow. This entry was posted in Humor, Vanguardists, White Nationalism. Bookmark the permalink. http://www.occidentaldissent.com/201...aga-continues/ Last edited by Robbie Key; October 18th, 2014 at 08:22 AM. |
October 18th, 2014 | #176 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|
October 18th, 2014 | #177 |
Switching to glide
|
Until Brad Griffen can get 100 people to show in public for a single event, then he can talk about being an organizer, because the attendance I've seen of his events so far couldn't adequately staff a reasonably successful Taco Bell during the lunch rush.
So it's a bit difficult to take him seriously.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder |
October 18th, 2014 | #178 | ||
Bread and Circuses
|
Quote:
According to Adolf Hitler: Quote:
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. |
||
October 18th, 2014 | #179 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 88
|
Quote:
This is Michael O’Meara’s Toward the White Republic: Our people face extinction not because the Jews or the liberals monopolize the media, force-feed us anti-white ideas, control the leading institutions, and wield all the power and influence. This is a big part of it, to be sure, but to see things solely—or principally—in these terms is to overlook the last two or three centuries of Western history.Like Sunic, O’Meara believes that capitalism is a larger factor of white decline than Jewish depredations. That’s what I call “bicausalism Type-B”: This is a copy-paste quote of one of my links above: These days my classification of “bicausalism” has stirred a long discussion through several threads at Occidental Dissent (see, e.g., here): 1.- Monocausalists – Most of the commenters at Age of Treason, and people like Dave Duke whom I deeply respect. These people believe that there’s but one cause of our woes: the subversive Jews. 2.- Bicausalists Type A – Those who, like Greg Johnson, Alex Linder and some commenters at Linder’s VNN Forum, believe that Jews are the primary cause of our woes, though there are other important factors as well. Unlike monocausalists, these bicausalists also blame our parents’ religion. 3.- Bicausalists Type B – Those who, like Tom Sunic, Manu Rodríguez and I believe that there’s something seriously wrong with us, extremely wrong actually. Whites’ mental issues (which include a Calvinist type of Old Testament Christianity that conquered North America) are the primary infection, and the Judaization of the West, a secondary infection (like AIDS / pneumonia, etc). This is my corollary to the above classification. Note that I have added a #4, which means an antithetical monocausal stance to the one mentioned above. (Keywords: AoT = the blog Age of Treason; GoV = the blog Gates of Vienna): 1. AoT-like monocausalism – blames Jews 100%, Whites 0%Of course, in bicausalism you can either blame one or the other in diverse ratios depending on the specific bicausal individual, say, 90 / 10 percent or inversely 45 / 55 percent, etc. I was trying to use specifically the case of the history of Spain's conversion to Christianity in the 6th century, and then Latin America as a textbook case of why whites can do it to themselves (thoroughgoing mongrelization) without the help of the subversive tribe.
__________________
http://chechar.wordpress.com/ |
|
October 18th, 2014 | #180 | ||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Taylor is the enemy, and we here should be proud to have been the first ones to call him out for what he is, and relentlessly bash him for his jew service. He is now seen by most as exactly what we've said he is: a jew tool. |
||||
Tags |
#1, white nationalism, wn infighting |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|