|
September 11th, 2009 | #61 | ||
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 251
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Occidental Dissent "A functioning police state needs no police." —William Borroughs |
||
September 12th, 2009 | #62 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Quote:
|
|
September 12th, 2009 | #63 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 251
|
Libertarians tend to think in abstract terms. They have all sorts of theories about government, economics, and ethics. I’m impressed less by their abstractions and more persuaded by the empirical results that follow their implemention.
We’ve tried almost everything the libertarians recommend over the course of American history: the gold standard, multiple currencies, financial deregulation, private roads/railroads, absence of the Federal Reserve, absence of the income tax, cutting back government bureaucracy, legalization of drugs, laissez-faire capitalism, international free trade, federalism/small government, expansion of civil liberties, neutering the state, deunionization, no Social Security, no Medicare/Medicaid, no Earned Income Tax Credit, no welfare system, no minimum wage or collective bargaining, no workplace safety standards, dispensing with virtue ethics, private schools, etc. We have a vast well of experience with radical liberty to draw upon. Yet the libertarians always seem to prefer their abstract arguments and deductive reasoning to historical ones. Why is that? We know how free market laissez-faire capitalism ends: in vast concentrations of wealth (land and capital) in the hands of a privileged few, huge multinational corporations that tower over the remaining small businesses, monopolies and cartels, private transportation systems that suck every penny out of the common man, race replacement through ‘cheap labor’ immigration, a radicalized, uneducated and degraded proletariat constantly engaged in strikes and riots and infected with Marxism, environmental degradation, financial panics and depression, shortage of credit, depressed wages, a plutocratic elite that buys elections and corrupts the political system with its largesse. It was a good system for the wealthiest few who didn’t use public services, at least for a while, until the top heavy economy periodically collapsed under its own weight in the inevitable cyclical depression. The system is inherently unstable for both labor and capital and gave rise to the very social forces which succeeded in undermining and overthrowing it. If by some chance we ever were to return to Gilded Age conditions, history would unfold again in much the same way. It is worth noting that this is the degenerate condition that millions of Jewish immigrants found Americans in when they arrived on our shores. Their arrival in the New World was part of the ‘cheap labor’ glut that flowed out of Eastern and Southern Europe into Northern industry at the time. The Jews would later climb the same ladder into the American plutocracy used by J.P. Morgan, Rockefeller, Carnegie and Ford. Aside from the small faction of libertarian ideologues, there is no constituency for returning to the days of the Robber Barons. The working class justifiably balks at surrendering the handful of concessions won from Capital over the past hundred years. The middle class, still reeling from ‘free trade’, clamors for ever more public services (which Obama promises to deliver). Even the wealthy realize that a managed economy is ultimately in their interest. It stiffles labor militancy and the growth of radical class-based redistributionist movements. The government is also useful (as in the Panic of ‘08) when it pulls their collective chestnuts out of the fire. White Nationalists support ending non-White immigration and deporting the non-White labor force already in the United States. In doing so, we have earned the implacable hostility of the business community; both small businesses and multinational corporations alike depend on their non-White helots. We’re proposing a permanent and radical increase in the price of labor that will bankrupt any number of businesses. The only way forward to the White ethnostate is through a knife fight to the death with the pro-business lobby and the ethnic grievance organizations that are allied to them. That’s not a fight we can possibly win with a libertarian economic agenda that will alienate the working class and lower middle class. Once the beast is subdued (the cheap labor lobby and its hanger ons), White Nationalists will have to be permanently on guard to ensure it never rises from the dead. As you note, this could involve constitutional measures, draconian penalties for racial treason, a permanent class or religious order of “Defenders” charged with the responsibility of overseeing the culture and economy, a national academy to train the “Defenders,” government control of the media, public schools that indoctrinate our youth in the racial ideal, or some combination the above. Whatever the case, the salient point is that a transition to a White Nationalist ethnostate (a process likely to take generations) will require authoritarian measures which run against the grain of libertarianism, and probably not solely on a temporary basis. Indeed, there is nothing “libertarian” at all about what we are proposing to do: overthrowing civic institutions and replacing them with a new blut und boden racial order, mass violations of sacrosanct individual rights and property rights, engaging in ‘aggression’ against sovereign individuals in the name of collectivism, engaging in racial and religious intolerance, imposing ethical and aesthetic standards on a libertine populace, etc. A true libertarian (whose mind is governed by universal abstractions) would never entertain such measures. In many ways, the White Nationalist worldview (based solely on collective self interest, not highminded universal principles) is the polar opposite of libertarianism and the other species of liberalism. If you really think about it, libertarianism has no future in a White Nationalist ethnostate. In selecting our form of government, our primary concern must be the nature of our elite, not the ‘rights’ of individuals. After a successful revolutionary struggle, I seriously doubt White Nationalists will want to go back to the days when America was governed by a shallow Judeo-Capitalist plutocracy whose primary qualification to rule was their ability to make money. Social mobility will have to be organized on some other basis than the Horatio Alger myth; perhaps along the lines of the “essentially religious civil servants” you described above. At a minimum, this would require a highly regulated economy, not the laissez-faire free market favored by libertarians. Most importantly, the status system will have to be forever severed from market economy, which is another blow against libertarianism. We’ve seen the mischief the advertising industry has caused by creating artificial needs and instilling sick materialistic values in the masses. This is closely linked to the low White birthrate, racial nihilism, and popularity of contraception and abortion in the West. You’ve already mentioned that status must be linked to values like duty, honor, and self sacrifice in the new system. I would go beyond that and argue for a return to virtue ethics in your HS curriculum. We need to move beyond the silly expressivist notion that each child should be allowed to nurture his own individuality. From our perspective, some values are manifestly superior to others. In a White ethnostate, ‘liberty’ and ‘equality’ would be knocked off the pedestal they now occupy in contemporary political discourse. More important considerations like community and the preservation of our genetic integrity would rise to the fore and take precedence. I seriously doubt we would break wholly with the tradition of individual rights or basic republican equality before the law. The old values would still have their place, but they would no longer be considered absolute, center stage, or universally applicable to all races. The market economy is also another likely survivor, albeit in a form unrecognizable to the one we are familar with today. I will stop short of saying that pro-Whites need an entirely new political philosophy. We don’t need to establish a new set of (false) universal principles which could later be invoked to sabotage our racial interests. Instead, we should take our direction from art and literature that reflect our racial ideals, and adopt a critical posture towards all systemizers and their fetish for abstractions.
__________________
Occidental Dissent "A functioning police state needs no police." —William Borroughs |
September 12th, 2009 | #64 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 251
|
In a White ethnostate, there would be no shortage of outlets for individual talent and genius. You could easily spend your entire life trying to restore racial sanity to Kirksville, MO. That's one small town. Your efforts alone probably wouldn't be enough to get the job done.
There are thousands of towns all across America in similar desperate condition. In such places, there will be plenty of 'freedom' to do what matters. The 'freedom' of young White girls to drop their panties for sweaty negroes in the restroom of integrated clubs might be taken away. The 'freedom' of Jews to own mass media outlets and poison the morals of the masses will similarly be dispensed with. A healthy civilization doesn't need 'freedom' of that sort. No one is proposing that an all powerful central government run everything. Outright race sabotage should be illegal. It shouldn't be licensed in the name of liberty.
__________________
Occidental Dissent "A functioning police state needs no police." —William Borroughs |
September 13th, 2009 | #65 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 98
|
John Dewey, at the behest Justice Felix Frankfurter, succeeded in getting the Ivy League's numerus clausus (quota system) on Jewish enrollment at Harvard rolled back. This opened the doors just wide enough for the whole constellation of American elite universities to be taken over. He personified the sort of high WASP noblesse oblige which ultimately resulted in the incremental handing of the whole country over to the new alien elite in fits of Fabian rectitude.
|
September 14th, 2009 | #66 | ||
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 316
|
Quote:
Quote:
Could we be doing any worse job of alienating the White working class IF WE TRIED? As Alex might put it: those crickets you hear chirping after your last post is the sack of cats on this site mulling over how they are ever going to start cooperating economically. *chirp* But - Look at what can be done with the right emphasis and a little imagination: http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/17012 Now I ask: Is that really so undesirable or something to fear? DEATH to the judeo-Capitalist plutocracy and judaic spirit that rules over our lives! |
||
September 15th, 2009 | #67 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 909
|
Free enterprise and capitalism are two very different things.
In our post-agricultural, post-industrial consumerist society, restrictions limiting or even dismantaling capitalist enterprises such as Wal-Mart, Home jewPot, Lowes, and perhaps more importantly corporate restaurants, would create an environment in which every American family could successfully operate a small business. Want to open a hardware store or restaurant? Good luck with that shit. Man was freest when he controlled the means to his own livelihood in agriculture. Under capitalism, we're all peasants to the feudal corporations. Getting rid of a lot of these fuckers would allow every man to own his own "farm" again, so to speak. True, free enterprise (freedom of competition) is the only way to go, but the cycle of capitalism always ends in the same place. Much like communism, capitalism has it's interesting points in theory, but human nature always gets in the way of the final product. |
September 15th, 2009 | #68 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,896
|
|
September 15th, 2009 | #70 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2009 | #71 |
Administrator
|
You want to operate in retail (not just clothes but general) you have to pretty much make one of three choices: unique products, special services, low cost.
Food example here in Kirksville: - low-cost (Aldi) - special services (Hy-Vee - "a smile in every aisle") - unique products (Wal-mart - all kinds of items the other two don't carry) |
September 15th, 2009 | #73 |
Administrator
|
Wal-mart started as a small store. What differentiated it was the owner, Sam Walton, got off his ass and made deals. Your average mom-and-pop store does not want to do that. It wants to sit on its ass and enjoy the markup because its customers can't drive 90 miles to get better deals. A lot of the whining about Wal-Mart is simply the combined hue of the lazy + the leftists. It's certainly not coming from W-M workers or customers. It comes from professors and other useless eaters.
|
September 15th, 2009 | #74 |
Administrator
|
Dewy is fairly described as the jewiest non-jew who ever lived. He was a pervert and a liar; a blackmailer and a subverter. He should be buried in a jewish cemetery though he be 100% WASP (I think).
|
September 15th, 2009 | #75 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2009 | #76 | ||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
So you end up with people who are trying to be radicals, because they know it is intellectually indicated, but, because of the professional deformation they have undergone in the long years in the academy, they have simply lost the dynamism and wildness you need to spark the real thing. The best they can manage is a limp $PLC. It's almost as cute as it is pathetic. But of course, it could be contended that many successful political radicals came from middle-class academic backgrounds, Che for example. Rightists, and racialism is rightism, no matter Metzger's opinion, don't tend to be cultists as leftists are. After all, if they were prone to unreality, they would be leftists. While this makes them more desirable as people, it makes them less suited to forming radical cadre. They simply can't get past acting gentlemanly, not making people feel bad, being respectful even when they disagree. This renders them essentially unfit for the revolutionary task, save as dredgers up of useful facts and quotations. I have no fear of looking bad. I have no Ph.D. and have never been to grad school. I don't have to impress anybody. So I can write with the inner wildness one needs, the wildness that when combined with factual knowledge can lead to liberating breakthroughs in terms and frames. To me, and anyone else in my class, the academics are miners excavating rough diamonds. But they have no idea how to carve and set them. I do. They provide the bones, but I know how to flesh the body and make it dance. We don't win over elites, we make ours the quest for the ages. We lure new elites not by the promise of riches and fame but by the prospect of glory eternal. That's what lured me - a person who had other options - the prospect of going down in history as the man who defeated the jews. Not just in a time and space, but for all eternity. There's your unique selling propsition, not fucking IQ differences or some fucking Mythos, whatever that is, I guess a cereal of some sort. Glory, baby. It's hard to be on glory road when your colon doesn't work. Where is the new me? Him I want to read. Do you grok me, Aryan water brothers? Any of you? |
||
September 15th, 2009 | #77 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 909
|
Quote:
Most truly independent small businesses catering in common goods have been in business long before the giants started their monster expansions in the 1990s, and thus have a pre-established customer base. How does a new business get started up competing with corporate grocery stores, corporate dollar stores, corporate restaurants, corporate gas stations. I just feel that the real freedom of competition, if you will, is being constrained more and more over time. Sure you can theoretically, but in certain cases not realistically. My concern is more in the future. I think it's fair to say that the big ones will carve out enough of the market that the concept of "small business" (speaking strictly of your typical store-front type of business) will be a concept known only to a minority. |
|
September 15th, 2009 | #78 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 909
|
Quote:
|
|
September 15th, 2009 | #79 | ||||||||||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
All you get when you support regulation is taxes. Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||
September 15th, 2009 | #80 | |||||
Administrator
|
Quote:
BTW, I guess we might be lily-ish up here compared to your neck of the woods, but I can assure you there are plenty of niggers all the way up through Northern Missouri, Iowa and Minnesota. There are plenty of niggers in the twin cities, and plenty in the Quad Cities area too. Anywhere there's a river or a main road there are niggers. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
Tags |
faileoconservative, whino |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|