Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts


Go Back   Vanguard News Network Forum > News & Discussion > General Discussion
Donate Register Multimedia Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Login

 
Thread Display Modes Share
Old December 7th, 2012 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Even the Lord of Deficit Spending Agrees with Lenin: Currency Debauching (Printing Money) Destroys Society

Started reading Keynes Hayek: The Clash that Defined Modern Economics, by Nicholas Wapshott (2011). Here's an interesting bit:

In The Economic Consequences of the Peace, Keynes had raised the perils of inflation running out of control in language that would be hurled back at him by Hayek and his "sound money" followers. Keynes was aware that the fixed relationship between currencies before World War I, pegged to the price of gold, had been overtaken by events, because governments had printed money to pay for the war. Keynes reminded readers that the undermining of currencies was an invitation to revolution. "Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency," wrote Keynes. "By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens." Keynes gave credit to the Bolshevik leader for his perspicacity. "Lenin was certainly right," he wrote. "There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency." In November 1918, by Keynes's reckoning, "in Russia and Austro-Hungary this process [of printing money] has reached a point where for the purposes of foreign trade the currency is practically useless." But Keynes cautioned that "the preservation of a spurious value for the currency, by the force of law expressed in the regulation of prices, contains in itself, however, the seeds of final economic decay." For those like Hayek, huddled in winter coats in their apartments because they could not afford fuel, Keynes's warning rang true. (pp. 22-23)
 
Old December 7th, 2012 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Queer socialist Keyenes is essentially the father of deficit spending - yet he admits that currency inflation, printing money, counterfeiting, whatever you want to call it, steals the working man's purchasing power, thereby destroying society and preparing the way for political revolution. The communist Lenin agrees.

Nigger like Obama does exactly what they're talking about, possibly without realizing it.

This could open an opportunity for WN, if we are prepared to take advantage of it.

Last edited by Alex Linder; December 7th, 2012 at 10:26 PM.
 
Old December 7th, 2012 #3
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,802
Hunter Morrow
Default

This fraud "money" system that is a thieving enabler of Judaism has been rejected by the young, by my generation. It was set up to discredit capitalism. The term for the money grubbing and greed and theft absent all race and nation concern has been thoroughly associated with fascism in the eyes of my generation. People tell me that America lives in a fascist nation!

When Mussolini nationalized certain aspects of lending, nationalized gas and oil and the railroads and controlled the currency was that what we have now? Or do we have profiteering cartels?

There is no race concern to what we have now. We have the opposite. The dissolution of national pride and race pride in this internationalist multiculturalism.

Now, my generation is right to reject this but they fall straight into the propaganda trap! Socialism has been set up as the opposite of the "fascism" America and the White world has now. So now more young people have a favorable view of socialism than "fascist capitalism."

People aged 18-29 have a more favorable view of socialism than capitalism. An entire race in this country, niggers, associate a huge socialist government with mandatory power and goodies for them. An entire political party has a majority of its people in favor of socialism.
Quote:
Recently the Pew Center for research published a poll in which they found that 49 percent of young people in the U.S. have a favorable view of socialism, while only 43 percent reported viewing it unfavorably. The report also revealed that African Americans have a favorable view of socialism at a rate of 55 percent to 36 percent.




I know the present system will fall but I think it has been designed to fall into the hands of socialists.

Socialism is just Judaism/Bolshevism anyhow.
 
Old December 7th, 2012 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
I know the present system will fall but I think it has been designed to fall into the hands of socialists.

Socialism is just Judaism/Bolshevism anyhow.
It's our "education" system that's changing attitudes. People of no initiative or brains are reduced to whining about fairness, their calling card for stealing the earnings of others. Public school teachers are education majors - the dumbest major in college. They have no ambition or brains or they wouldn't be teaching in government schools. And they hate those who do.
 
Old December 7th, 2012 #5
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,802
Hunter Morrow
Default

It is a good thing it isn't mandatory to attend public school by law and it is a good thing we don't spend 600 billion a year on public schools. It is also a good thing that college degrees aren't mandatory tests to see if somebody is adequately "politically correct" and "multicultural" that have my generation 1 trillion dollars in debt.

Oh. Oh. Fuck.
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #6
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
It's our "education" system that's changing attitudes. People of no initiative or brains are reduced to whining about fairness, their calling card for stealing the earnings of others. Public school teachers are education majors - the dumbest major in college. They have no ambition or brains or they wouldn't be teaching in government schools. And they hate those who do.
They're infinitely self-righteous with an infinite sense of entitlement- and not only in the Kwa, let me tell you. In Sweden, the teachers-union is the biggest one by far, and they just recently finished the yearly wage negotiations (that always allows for tedious, week-long whining in the press), and they demanded, listen to this: a 1500$ raise... a month! (From their current 3500$ wage.) Granted, that is gross figures, and with our very high tax pressure, a large proportion of that nordic money gets recycled back into the keynesian' pot before it ever hits their bank-account, but it is still gives a good indication of just how delusional they are.

Even more dumbfounding is that they are heavily leftist leaning, with around 70% voting in support for what is considered the left block (social-democrats, the greens and the left-party [that has changed it's name from "left-party communists"], although, with our "right" being the equivalent of left by european standards, that distincion could arguably be deemed redundant -- AND they (in particular the women) are heavily supportive of the third-world invasion that is absolutely shredding not only our society and communties to pieces, but our budget too. Leftist feminine socialist hegemony + vicarious generosity + isolated nordic egalitarian mind-set + third-world jew led biological attack= An absolutely lethal brew.

... need I even mention that our school results are dropping like a stone on top of all this? I say we draw the gigantic immigration costs from the same account that are paying this army of ineffective, sloppy indoctrinators' -then, maybe, we'll get to see some fireworks. Because say what one might about them, their rabidness and delusional self-righteousness is at least 100% genuine, and I could see it channeled into a murdering frenzy if you could show that something, or some group*, was eating DIRECTLY into their pay-check. (The inflation is of course already doing this year by year, and the publicly founded invader costs too, but they're to dumb to realize those "subtleties", [or even that the state does not intrinsically "have" ANY money; as it only redistributes what it has taken from others] thus, you have to keep it on a VERY basic level.)
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #7
Hunter Morrow
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,802
Hunter Morrow
Default

Yes. Teaching has become left wing, big government Bolshevism so the profession self-selects for people like that. These people have the lowest SAT and ACT scores and wind up with the highest GPA. All the classes are just indoctrination.

The thing that always has puzzled me is that these people play a huge, public role in pushing the racial dissolution of their nations in the class room and in the voting booth and yet they have all privately complained to me of the impossibility of educating "African American and Hispanic youth." Well, quit voting to bring more of 'em!

Europe is the same way with the Muslims. Teachers publicly kiss the Stone Age asses of ragheds for status and financial gain and then privately complain that they are ineducable savages.

Well...QUIT TELLING EVERYBODY HOW GOOD THEY ARE IF THEY SUCK! IF THEY SUCK, QUIT VOTING TO BRING THEM IN!

That is the quality of a government school teacher's mind.
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #8
Jordan Appleyard
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solskeniskyn
They're infinitely self-righteous with an infinite sense of entitlement- and not only in the Kwa, let me tell you. In Sweden, the teachers-union is the biggest one by far, and they just recently finished the yearly wage negotiations (that always allows for tedious, week-long whining in the press), and they demanded, listen to this: a 1500$ raise... a month! (From their current 3500$ wage.) Granted, that is gross figures, and with our very high tax pressure, a large proportion of that nordic money gets recycled back into the keynesian' pot before it ever hits their bank-account, but it is still gives a good indication of just how delusional they are.
Off-topic, but becuase you are in Scandinavia (and I am 1/4th Swede), I just really hate even more that in neighboring Finland the educational system is one of the best in the world (for fucks sake they compared with Japan), and all this accomplished by a rigorous, competitive, unapologetic method of teacher selection that draws its new crop of teachers each year from the top 5% graduations of teacher colleges. Then the liberals cry this is all Oh So All Elitest and Evil, that everybody is all equal in intellectual endowment, and anybody who wants to be a teacher just ought to get the job. But when you get them talking about the American education system vs. Finland's, they steam roll over America shamelessly in a super hypocritical turnabout because Finland is in Europe, everything is better just because it is in Europe, and it's such a terrible and unforgivable shame America picks most of it's new teachers from the 2/3rds bottom of the graduating class. This attitude forementioned I saw several months ago as an article in the Smithsonian magazine. Finland's rigourous teacher picks is responsible for installing teachers who promise full dedication no matter what obstacle to helping every single child, especially those kids most likely to drop out and become wiggers for life. It seems the liberals would rather have all the kids suffer a bad education and the downfall of a nation so they can win another debate and pump their egos being right all the time, and threating those dissenting with loss of their jobs or drumming up false charges, or calling and reporting the IP address of the accused to the FBI (as is the case with the Democratic Underground forums when a heated debate gets nasty they do this to their conservative posters).

And of course, by the way, what is Sweden's rank of education globally? Far behind Finland?
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #9
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan Appleyard View Post
Off-topic, but becuase you are in Scandinavia (and I am 1/4th Swede), I just really hate even more that in neighboring Finland the educational system is one of the best in the world (for fucks sake they compared with Japan), and all this accomplished by a rigorous, competitive, unapologetic method of teacher selection that draws its new crop of teachers each year from the top 5% graduations of teacher colleges. Then the liberals cry this is all Oh So All Elitest and Evil, that everybody is all equal in intellectual endowment, and anybody who wants to be a teacher just ought to get the job. But when you get them talking about the American education system vs. Finland's, they steam roll over America shamelessly in a super hypocritical turnabout because Finland is in Europe, everything is better just because it is in Europe, and it's such a terrible and unforgivable shame America picks most of it's new teachers from the 2/3rds bottom of the graduating class. This attitude forementioned I saw several months ago as an article in the Smithsonian magazine. Finland's rigourous teacher picks is responsible for installing teachers who promise full dedication no matter what obstacle to helping every single child, especially those kids most likely to drop out and become wiggers for life. It seems the liberals would rather have all the kids suffer a bad education and the downfall of a nation so they can win another debate and pump their egos being right all the time, and threating those dissenting with loss of their jobs or drumming up false charges, or calling and reporting the IP address of the accused to the FBI (as is the case with the Democratic Underground forums when a heated debate gets nasty they do this to their conservative posters).

And of course, by the way, what is Sweden's rank of education globally? Far behind Finland?
Yeah, that's some glaring hypocrisy for you. The same kind of, eh, inconsistencies can be seen from Swedish leftists' as well (in other areas).

Our educations system started heading south at some point in the 80's, with big changes in structure and methodology; and up to that point we had a more traditional, rigorous, qualitative approach that I'd say was closer to the one you're still enjoying. But it is this last decade that the drop has really started to become evident; yes even critical, according to some. The reason? Well, this is certainly not my area of expertize, and call me crazy, but I'd theorize that the hundreds of thousands third-worlders that have flooded in, many of which are completely illiterate and have not before attended a day in school (not accounting for the more important IQ and genetic differences) could have something to do with it...

I know that they often refer to the 'PISA'-rankings when discussing these things, and a quick google gives:

Quote:
... Sweden came in 19th overall out of 65 OECD countries and partners, far behind OECD partner Shanghai, China and OECD leaders Korea and Finland, the PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) 2009 survey revealed. Nordic neighbours Norway (12th) and Iceland (16th) also came ahead of Sweden, as well as the US in 17th.

Compared with PISA 2000, Sweden has lost 19 points and now has 497, compared with 556 for Shanghai, 539 for Korea and 536 for Finland. The OECD average is 493.
...
http://www.thelocal.se/30668/20101207/
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #10
Solskeniskyn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,424
Solskeniskyn
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hunter Morrow View Post
Yes. Teaching has become left wing, big government Bolshevism so the profession self-selects for people like that. These people have the lowest SAT and ACT scores and wind up with the highest GPA. All the classes are just indoctrination.

The thing that always has puzzled me is that these people play a huge, public role in pushing the racial dissolution of their nations in the class room and in the voting booth and yet they have all privately complained to me of the impossibility of educating "African American and Hispanic youth." Well, quit voting to bring more of 'em!

Europe is the same way with the Muslims. Teachers publicly kiss the Stone Age asses of ragheds for status and financial gain and then privately complain that they are ineducable savages.

Well...QUIT TELLING EVERYBODY HOW GOOD THEY ARE IF THEY SUCK! IF THEY SUCK, QUIT VOTING TO BRING THEM IN!

That is the quality of a government school teacher's mind.
We actually had an aired debate just this last night with the school-minister of our "conservative" government coalition getting "grilled" by the standard collection of screaming teachers (women) of leftist persuation. Their claim? The narrative? The usual: the worst afflicted schools in the most under-priviliged (immigrant ghetto) neighbourhoods are underfunded, and this is the reason that they are performing so abysmally in school. Only, and this is significant: if you actually look at charts mapping out how much each of the schools are receiving per pupil, you see that these so called "under privileged", "discriminated against" students are in fact getting 120-150-200- sometimes 300%(!) of what the average pupil gets. I.e they are by objective measures favored; priviliged; which is the opposite of what these "debates" ends up conveying, and what the average, unknowing Swede walks away thinking.

They always make sure not to get into any specifics, lest these inconvenient facts could actually surface; but, even if they would, I'm sure these ladies wouldn't be daunted one bit by it. "So what?" they would say, "we are entitled to all the funds we could possibly need to provide for a "sufficient" student environment." "That is societys responsibility." "Period." Because "every child's right to a good education is more important than some numbers scribbled together on a budget sheet".

Watching this farce, I got reminded once more of the observation that I know Alex et al have made numerous times, that relates to the coinage: vicarious generosity (which I think is genius and really strikes home) - the distinctively feminine character of this mindset. It's at its chore emotionally driven. Anti-distinctions. Anti-hard-cold-facts. And I am sure that without this very distinctive and destructive turn to the feminine that characterize Swedens (&Kwa's &the contemporary western) political debate, the "multi-cultural", jew instigated, at face value absolutely insane third-world immigration, would not have been able to take place.
 
Old December 8th, 2012 #11
Rick Ronsavelle
Senior Member
 
Rick Ronsavelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,006
Rick Ronsavelle
Default

Yah, the real war is masculine vs. feminine.

On the right- making distinctions. The masculine (now illegal- "anti-discrimination". Taking facts into account is now illegal.)

On the left- denial of distinctions- the worst being denial of difference between thought and fantasy. This is feminine. jew is also here- some strange hybrid.

Both sides claim they are oppressed by the other- Both are right.

A renaissance period suppresses the female/fantasy. Thought predominates.

An anti-renaissance period (now) suppresses the masculine. Fantasy predominates, with fantasy paper money. And fantasy alchemy (stones into bread [Keynes], niggers into humans, and so on. And fantasy socialism.)

The basic war- in our heads, and outside too, is:

THOUGHT VERSUS FANTASY.
 
Reply

Tags
counterfeiting, deficit spending, keynes, lenin, revolution

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.
Page generated in 0.15397 seconds.