|
|
|
Thread | Display Modes | Share |
May 24th, 2021 | #21 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
.
The jews' vicious hate campaign against Corbyn continues, even when he's no longer the party leader, and they use photoshopped pictures of him: Quote:
|
|
July 23rd, 2021 | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
July 26th, 2021 | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
"Sir" Trevor Chinn. "Trust me, goyim." |
|
August 3rd, 2021 | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
August 15th, 2021 | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
August 16th, 2021 | #26 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,286
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
September 4th, 2021 | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
https://www.unz.com/jcook/jewish-chr...-and-the-left/ |
|
September 26th, 2021 | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
September 27th, 2021 | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
September 27th, 2021 | #30 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
|
September 28th, 2021 | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 996
|
UK Labour denounces anti-Israel motion as not 'comprehensive' or 'balanced'
Labour's Shadow Foreign Secretary Lisa Nandy claimed a motion calling for sanctions against Israel because it practises the crime of apartheid was not "comprehensive" or "balanced" and the leadership would not support it.
The motion,*voted in*at the Labour Party Conference yesterday, called for sanctions on the State of Israel and demanded it stops building illegal settlements, ends its occupation of the West Bank and the blockade of Gaza and reverses its annexation of Palestinian lands. It received overwhelming support from local Labour Party branches and trade unionists and passed at Labour's annual conference in Brighton, however, it was deemed unbalanced and incomprehensive and rejected by the leadership. Nandy, however, claimed that Labour policy was to condemn unacceptable use of violence against civilians on "all sides". More here... https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20...e-or-balanced/ Israeli lackeys are in ALL Government's!!! |
October 19th, 2021 | #32 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 996
|
The tyranny of translunacy how higher status in leftism decides who can invade whose territory
Here’s an interesting sentence in Latin:*Utinam populus romanus unam cervicem haberet!*But what does it mean? Since the nineteenth century, fewer and fewer British prime ministers have been able to answer that question. Boris Johnson bucked the trend. He*has a degree*in classics from Oxford and could tell you instantly*that it means: “Would that the Roman people had a single neck!”
Serve the cervix He could also tell you that those were the headchop-hungry words of the tyrant Caligula (12–41 AD),*according to*the historian Seneca, and that*cervicem*is the accusative singular of the feminine Latin noun*cervix, meaning “neck.” Johnson could also tell you all the other forms of*that word in Latin, from the dative singular to the genitive plural. But alas, his grasp of the word in modern English has deserted him. It’s now a medical term meaning “the neck of the womb.” But when Johnson was asked at the Conservative Party Conference to affirm that only women have a cervix, he*evaded the question: “What I think about this is [that] biology is very important. But we have a system now in our country for many, many years in which people can change gender. We help them to do that and what I absolutely passionately believe, and I fought for this for a long time, is everybody should be treated with dignity and respect.” By piffling and prevaricating like that, Johnson blew his chance to put clear blue water between the Conservatives and their supposed ideological opponents in the Labour party. In the previous week the Labour leader,*Keir Starmer, had been asked whether it was transphobic to think, as*one of his female MPs*does, that “only women have a cervix.” The swamp-creature Starmer*claimed it was*indeed transphobic. That simple statement of biological fact was “something that shouldn’t be said,” he told his interviewer. “It is not right.” Why so? According to Starmer, it’s because transgender people are among the “most marginalised and abused communities.” If you don’t follow his logic, that’s unsurprising: there is no logic there. The alleged “marginalization” of transgender people doesn’t give them the right to replace biological reality with translunatic fantasies. Labour loves translunacy In fact, this absurd controversy about who has a cervix is proof that transgender people are the opposite of “marginalized.” Their lunatic ideas are accepted by mainstream leftists right across politics, academia and the media. The Labour party bows before transgender lunacy and the supposedly right-wing leader of the Conservative party refuses to repudiate it. But let’s be clear about what is going on in the cervix controversy. When Starmer made his absurd statements, he wasn’t worried about the sensitivities of “trans-men,” or cervix-possessing women who claim to be men. Trans-men are a relatively quiet and unaggressive group. No, Starmer was worried about “trans-women,” the variously perverted and mentally disturbed men who claim to be women. As Steve Sailer has often*pointed out, trans-women are both loud and aggressive. They’ve driven the transgender agenda, which now includes the drugging and mutilation of confused or misguided children. Biologically male translunatics are the ones that Starmer is scared of. If he had spoken the truth and said that only women have a cervix, it would immediately follow that those without a cervix cannot be women. Translunatics and their supporters would promptly have driven him out of the Labour leadership. More here... https://www.theoccidentalobserver.ne...ose-territory/ |
January 17th, 2022 | #33 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
February 4th, 2023 | #34 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
February 20th, 2023 | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
February 23rd, 2023 | #36 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
Quote:
Jewish "baroness" Ruth Smeeth: |
||
June 8th, 2023 | #37 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
June 9th, 2023 | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
Quote:
|
|
June 24th, 2023 | #39 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
.
The vicious, hateful jews keep attacking Jeremy Corbyn: Quote:
|
|
November 7th, 2023 | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 37,494
|
.
Bloodthirsty zionist Keir Starmer supports Pissrael's genocide against the Palestinians. Quote:
|
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|