The Biggest Mistake Men Make

[Charlie-Horse]

Originally Posted by natsocnet

Integrity doesn't come into it or do you prefer to trust the integrity of Gordon Brown because he's not Jewish...

When we speak of Jews, we speak in the general sense. Not all Jews are typically Jewy, but most are. Like saying not all men are straight, but most are.

Only hysterical idiots always think in absolutes. Like saying all men are rapists. All christians are nutcases. All women are oppressed.

When you are in a position to clear the Jews out, that will be a different matter. Until then there is nothing we won't use in our struggle to smash the control of our Jewish masters.

That's not a fair comparison, Gordon Brown is an 'Internationalist' Socialist and even worse a member of 'New' Labour. Labour are funded by the Jews, so I would not trust him either.

I would accept self criticism from a Jew but I would never trust him or take him at his word. This is what I mean when I say 'integrity', they are a race of deceivers and are as cunning as they are long lived. They have no concept of integrity, to a Jew to appear honest is a smart business move and a tactic to gain, that is all.

[April]

Originally Posted by Peer Fischer

Right, but you gotta make her think (or feel like) you're putting her on a pedestal.

No actually the opposite. You can hold her on a pedestal for being your lover, a good cook or the mother of your children, but dont let her know that.

Why do so many women go for nignogs? Because they act like they are hot shit and the stupid women believe it, after all that is what the TV says. Can imagine a black man or a spic kissing his woman's ass, hell no, they cheat and beat them up...and the dumb ass women love it.

I am not advocating cheating or beating, what I am saying is that it is Natural Law that women go for men that they perceive to be leaders or champions or at least bad asses who can protect them.

If you hold yourself up and act like you know what the hell you are doing, most people will perceive that you do.

[ben shockley]

Originally Posted by April Gaede

No actually the opposite. You can hold her on a pedestal for being your lover, a good cook or the mother of your children, but dont let her know that.

Why do so many women go for nignogs? Because they act like they are hot shit and the stupid women believe it, after all that is what the TV says. Can imagine a black man or a spic kissing his woman's ass, hell no, they cheat and beat them up...and the dumb ass women love it.

I am not advocating cheating or beating, what I am saying is that it is Natural Law that women go for men that they perceive to be leaders or champions or at least bad asses who can protect them.

If you hold yourself up and act like you know what the hell you are doing, most people will perceive that you do.

You got a thing for the bad boys April? BAd Boys+smart=smart
Bad Boys+dumb=dumb

[Sándor Petőfi]

Originally Posted by natsocnet

Integrity doesn't come into it or do you prefer to trust the integrity of Gordon Brown because he's not Jewish...

Straw man.

When we speak of Jews, we speak in the general sense.

Who are "we"? When I speak of Jews, I speak in the racial sense.

Not all Jews are typically Jewy, but most are.

All Jews are Jewish by race. Do you understand what the Jewish race is? It is a race of cultural parasites by evolution.

Like saying not all men are straight, but most are.

All men are heterosexual.

Only hysterical idiots always think in absolutes.

Oh the irony. Only hysterical idiots always think in absolutes. I think that settles the matter of who the idiot here is.

Like saying all men are rapists. All christians are nutcases. All women are oppressed.

All cobras are carnivores. All animals are mortal. All light waves propagate at the constant speed c in a vaccum. All contradictions are false. All H2O at 1 atmospheric pressure freezes below 273 K. All tapeworms are parasitic. All Jews are subversive.

When you are in a position to clear the Jews out, that will be a different matter. Until then there is nothing we won't use in our struggle to smash the control of our Jewish masters.

Jew apologist. Jew enabler. Go to Stormfront if you want confirmation of your beliefs. They think like you do over there.

[Sándor Petőfi]

Originally Posted by natsocnet

Of course there are exceptions,

There is nothing about this which is a matter of course.

you dope.

No, I don't, actually.

Jews who are known to their tribe as "self-loathing" Jews.

What's interesting for the case at hand about the self-loathing Jew is that he is literally self-loathing, for he realises the fact, which you apparently don't, that he cannot excape his Jewishness. The most enduring example of this is the suicide of Otto Weininger, a brilliant young man whose deep insights led him to understand that there is no redemption for a Jew but death.

As for the idea of Jüdischer Selbsthaß, on paper we owe that to Theodor Lessing, and Lessing owes it to his conversations with Ludwig Klages. Ironically, Lessing himself is an important example of the inescapability of the Rassensehle. For instance, his Geschichte als Sinngebung des Sinnlosen gives us, although it is not one of the author's aspirations, something of a signed confession of how Jews view history; they view it as a nothing more than myth, to be written as a person sees fit; hence their falsifications of history from Babylon to Berlin. Hebrew priest or Marxist theoretician, it makes no difference. If you don't know the work and are wondering what I mean, just think of Sigmund Feud's psychoanalytic theory; it is, contrary to the opinions of many racialists, a great work of psychology, except that it attempts to describe all of mankind when it fact it only describes Jews.

But all of this is strictly irrelevant, since Makow is not a self-loathing Jew. He is a Jew apologist.

In the meantime, "the Jews" serve as a convenient scapegoat for the Illuminati. It is easy to forget that the majority of Jews are patriotic citizens who would like to assimilate if only their country wasn't being dismantled. They are not part of this world government agenda.

He's also as nutty as a nut in a nutcase. In a bag full of nuts.

In conclusion, a Satanic cult controls the world. It consists not of Jews, Muslims, or Christians but of Satanists pretending to be Jews, Muslims, and Christians.

Yaaawn ...

Just because you say otherwise, don't make it true.

Well look who's talking.

So instead of spouting crap why don't you actually prove your assertion that Markow is just another typical Jew.

It's Makow. Alright then. I'll interpret his Jewish thought-patterns for you, since you say you're incapable of doing that for yourself.

Romantic love is the ersatz religion of our neo-pagan era, a form of idolatry based on sexual infatuation. But no one is worthy of adoration. No one is perfect.

JTP: Romantic love is sexual infatuation. The Jew understands sexual infatuation, but not romantic love, and conflates the two. It's quite ridiculous really, but it is typically Jewish. Contrast Keats with Ginsberg. Anybody who bothers to examine 4000 years of Aryan lyric and plastic art will find that this statement is false. For example, love is not a means of sex, but sex a means of love. You know what I mean by that, but a Jew doesn't.

There's a lesson learned in this. Jews do not know who Eros is. They do not feel it and subsequently don't know what we mean by it.

Allsiegender Eros,
Du wähltest als Hinterhalt
Zum Sprung auf gesicherte Beute
Die rosigen Wangen der Jungfrau.
Du schreitest über das Meer
Und über die ländliche Flur.
Niemand kann dir entfliehen,
Weder ein ewiger Gott
Noch ein sterblicher Mensch.
Dich empfinden ist Rasen.
Du lockest hinüber zum Unrecht
Sogar das Herz des Gerechten.
Durch dich entbrannten auch diesmal
Der Vater und Sohn zur Zwietracht;
Denn gegen die mächtige Stimme
Des Urgebotes erhebt sich
Das Liebesverlangen ...

Sophocles

There is no equivalent Jewish verse. There couldn't be. The Jew reads that and he thinks "What is this Greek up to?" Every matter of the soul is a scheme, a farce, to the Jew. That is only a reflection on him. Jews do in fact project. See what I meant earlier? Thank old Sigmund for explaining that.

JTP: Romantic love is a form of idolatry. It is, of course, the most curious of Jewish misunderstandings of paganism, and one of the best examples of how they cannot help but think in the crassest, material sense, that the Jewish prophets were convinced that pagans were worshipping the actual idols. He has done the same thing here.

JTP: No one is worthy of adoration. It is a Jewish habit to hold man in low esteem. Unfortunately this sort of thinking found its way into Europe through Christian priestcraft. For the Aryan, the person is indeed worthy of adoration, insofar as he is the embodiment of the ideal! Aha! What the stupid Hebrew has not understood is that it is not the person, but the ideal in the person that we love.

As for his assertions that romantic love is an ersatz religion, and that our era is neopagan, these are just lies. Dishonesty is typically, but not exclusively, Jewish. The only ersatz religion here is humanism.

A "means to an end" may sound harsh to some. But in fact, nature designed women to make things happen. Mainly babies. A girlfriend once said, "I want to be used."

JTP: A woman is a means to an end. Once more the Jew reveals his soul. Or rather the fact that he hasn't one. It's not the treating of women as objects I am speaking of, but his attitude towards his own life. Everything is a means to an end to a Jew. He'll never do anything if he doesn't get something out of it. So ideas like honour are entirely foreign to him.

A man might think of a wife as a race driver thinks of his car, a cowboy his horse, a shepherd his dog, or a carpenter his tools. Men treasure what belongs to them, serves them well, and are true.

JTP: There is nothing more Jewish than this. As difficult as it is for us to appreciate, this man actually does think of his wife as he thinks of his car or his box of tools.

The romantic model of male-female love, based on lust and idealization of beauty, does not work.

JTP: Again the Jew is attempting to conflate eros and lust. But he has outdone himself this time, and turned the idealisation of beauty into a vice. The denigration of beauty has its roots amongst the Levantines. The ancient Aryans in fact esteemed beauty as - the highest virtue. And rightly so!

Here's the ugly Jew



and here's the ugly Jew's idealisation of the family. Meet the Kikensteins.



Have you understood yet why Jews denigrate beauty?

Beauty is skin deep. There is no correlation between beauty and intelligence or character.

JTP: Beauty is skin deep. Nonsense. Not only is it a nonsense, but is ironically superficial.

Das Schöne ist eine Manifestation geheimer Naturgesetze, die uns ohne dessen Erscheinung ewig wären verborgen geblieben.

Beauty is a manifestation of secret natural laws, which otherwise would have been hidden from us forever. So Goethe. So the German soul.

And so science. It has long since explained the role of beauty in sexual selection and of sexual selection in evolution. Physical appearance is indeed the best indicator of physical health, and physical health is every bit as important as psychic health. Except to that troglodytic Jewish race that is.

But it doesn't end there. Whatever this Hebrew fool says, there are clear correlations between beauty and the psyche. The symmetries of the form, the gestures of the body, the tautness of the muscles, the expressions of the face; they all tell of mental health. Malformations in the region of the head are particularly offensive to our sensibilities, and are particularly predictive of some sort of malaise. The mentally retarded are typically ugly. So are criminals. And the underclasses. Think Jerry Springer. Or think Jews. There is a preponderance of psychopathology amongst Jews. Most Jews are insane in one manner or another, and most of them are physically ugly. Monstrum in fronte, monstrum in animo.

As for Jews, they have no beauty in them. So Jewish scribblings with brush or pen. The best any Jew could ever do was to imitate as Mendelssohn did, but the rule has always been ugliness. I have an evolutionary explanation for this fact, but I'll keep it to myself for now. I'll just say that further evidence of his inability to experience the beautiful is the physical ugliness of the Jewish race, the obvious result of an inability to select for beauty. Such ugliness is of course characteristic of parasitical species; think of tapeworms, ticks, lice, fleas etc.

Now, Henry Makow doesn't even know what this word beauty means to you or me. In fact, and if you had any insight you could see this in his writing, he gives it his own, typically Jewish meaning, namely that of lust. The problem is, when Aryans have this rubbish drummed into their heads long enough they begin to believe it.

JTP: Overestimation of intelligence. Intelligence is a Jewish red-herring. We see this when it is taken to its desired conclusion on Stormfront, where the argument is made that [I]Jews are fine because Jews can solve a bunch of inane puzzles in an IQ test[/I, or miscegenation with mongoloids is alright, since mongoloids can add 2 +2 . Also, valuation of humans based upon intelligence. It's an absurdity. And it's completely alien to traditional Aryan thought.

In "Satan: Prince of this World" William Guy Carr wrote: "Satanists have always used sex bribery and the depravities and perversions of sex to obtain control of men and women they wished to use to further their diabolical conspiracy. Satanism makes a God of sex." (p. 37)

JTP: Paranoia. Moreover, sexual paranoia. Everything is reduced to either sex or economics for the Jew. Those are, after all, the only motivations with which his evolution has supplied him, for that is all the parasite needs to do to survive; multiply and suck dry. Hence Freudianism and Marxism.

Believe me, I can go on, but it's rather late.

This is the agenda of the kabalistic central bankers who control the mass media, education and government.

See, the Jew just can't bring himself to say Jewish. Kabbalistic? Sure, if that means Talmud-reading, Torah-observing, kappel-wearing Jews.

Women have been turned into sex objects in order to homo-sexualize us.

As for that statement, it's just plain batty.

[kevinlanning]

Originally Posted by April Gaede

No actually the opposite. You can hold her on a pedestal for being your lover, a good cook or the mother of your children, but dont let her know that.

Why do so many women go for nignogs? Because they act like they are hot shit and the stupid women believe it, after all that is what the TV says. Can imagine a black man or a spic kissing his woman's ass, hell no, they cheat and beat them up...and the dumb ass women love it.

I am not advocating cheating or beating, what I am saying is that it is Natural Law that women go for men that they perceive to be leaders or champions or at least bad asses who can protect them.

If you hold yourself up and act like you know what the hell you are doing, most people will perceive that you do.

The difference between being pussy whipped and a leader is knowing one's self enough to set boundaries and keep them.

Once the boundaries are established then a woman knows that being treated like she is on a pedestal only comes with mutual respect for the man's needs.

Funny how you mentioned that women like bad asses because I was always the one getting in trouble that the girls liked. Now that I am single again, they still like me but they are so fat that I am afraid that they will eat me.

[kevinlanning]

Originally Posted by Mike Jahn

What they mean by "playing the game" is that you are supposed to create conflict with them to prove you are a man. Men don't understand that women want conflict and emotional upheavals (drama) while men like sameness and stability.

I understand that very well but the type of conflict that is needed by the female is directly related to her emotional and intellectual abilities. Conflict and cat and mouse is very stimulating with an intelligent and attractive woman. Drama and turmoil by an out of shape child is debilitating. Guess which one is in the majority?

[Mike Jahn]

Originally Posted by Sándor Petőfi

As for that statement, it's just plain batty.

No, Makow is right about that, the Jew media promotes promiscuity because it creates rootless White males, males who can live everywhere but nowhere. A promiscuous White male can't built a community to organize against Jewry because he is incapable of forming or maintaining a family. Strong communities are formed by a chain of families working together, promiscuity eliminates the capacity to make the chain. The individualist focus of homosexuals is very similar to the individualism of the rogue "player" White males. Homosexuals don't care what kind of world they will leave behind (sorry no pun intended) when they die and neither do the promiscuous White males.

[April]

Originally Posted by ben shockley

You got a thing for the bad boys April? BAd Boys+smart=smart
Bad Boys+dumb=dumb

NO I got that out of my system long ago, and I was never really into it that much anyway. But I do know how my sisters think.

Now at my age I see the attractiveness of a man who is a good father, a good provider an avid reader and a strict National Socialist.

[Sándor Petőfi]

Originally Posted by Mike Jahn

No, Makow is right about that, the Jew media promotes promiscuity because it creates rootless White males, males who can live everywhere but nowhere. A promiscuous White male can't built a community to organize against Jewry because he is incapable of forming or maintaining a family.

That is only part of the picture, because promiscuity by itself cannot do this. Indeed, promiscuity had never before been an issue for men. No, the problem is that of unmarried men, and this is a result, partly, of men being no longer able to satisfy their drives within the context of marriage. Under ridiculous notions of sexual equality, modernity has redefined adultery as

Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse.

whereas adultery meant

Sexual intercourse between a man and another man's wife.

as we can see from the KJV

Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Here are just two examples of how this monogomania destroys the family:

Young men are hesitant to marry because marriage, under Judeo-Christian law, means a stifling of their natural drives. In the past European men circumvented this inconvenience de facto by taking mistresses. This is no longer feasible because a) it is no longer socially acceptable, b) wives are now in positions of power over their husbands, which together give us the fact that any straying from the path means a waving of divorce papers. Thus families are not formed.

As already implied, women now expect their husbands to be monogamous. This reflects social norms rather than nature, although a women is naturally competitive and giving her power yields the desired result: miserable men or divorced men. Thus families are torn apart.

Strong communities are formed by a chain of families working together, promiscuity eliminates the capacity to make the chain.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that what you really meant to say was female promiscuity.

The individualist focus of homosexuals is very similar to the individualism of the rogue "player" White males.

Similar is not the same. You cannot make men want to have sex with men by making them want to have sex with women.

Homosexuals don't care what kind of world they will leave behind (sorry no pun intended) when they die and neither do the promiscuous White males.[/QUOTE]

Makow is wrong, because homosexuals are born, not made. Makow the Judeo-Christian cannot admit this on religious grounds. And, no, sexual molestation is not a sufficient cause for homosexuality, because most victims do not end up as homosexuals.

[Axel Faaborg]

Originally Posted by Sándor Petőfi

As already implied, women now expect their husbands to be monogamous. This reflects social norms rather than nature, although a women is naturally competitive and giving her power yields the desired result: miserable men or divorced men. Thus families are torn apart.

I personally would have no problem being monogamous if it were with the kind of woman I want. Hell, I actually did have that for a while before it all went to shit, and I was damn happy to be faithful to her. I certainly wasn't left wanting for sex.

Perhaps the problem is not so much women demanding men be monogamous, but instead those same women being annoying cunts and on top of it not taking responsibility for making sure that the man is satisfied in exchange for said demand.

At any rate, from what I see we now have a huge problem of WOMEN not being monogamous as well. What in the world is the fix for that?

[Axel Faaborg]

Originally Posted by Sándor Petőfi

Makow is wrong, because homosexuals are born, not made. Makow the Judeo-Christian cannot admit this on religious grounds. And, no, sexual molestation is not a sufficient cause for homosexuality, because most victims do not end up as homosexuals.

How sure are you of this? Any research done on it that you know of?

Anecdotal experience of my own strongly suggests otherwise.

[Harry Flash]

Sándor Petőfi

I asked you to prove your assertion; not to deliver another dump load of B grade opinionated crap. Don't waste my time.

Don't bother to respond. You'll get no further reply.

[Harry Flash]

Originally Posted by Charlie-Boy

That's not a fair comparison, Gordon Brown is an 'Internationalist' Socialist and even worse a member of 'New' Labour. Labour are funded by the Jews, so I would not trust him either.

I would accept self criticism from a Jew but I would never trust him or take him at his word. This is what I mean when I say 'integrity', they are a race of deceivers and are as cunning as they are long lived. They have no concept of integrity, to a Jew to appear honest is a smart business move and a tactic to gain, that is all.

Sure... whatever

The point is that any "self loathing" Jew is of value because he is an outsider proving our assertions about Jewry as a whole.

[brutus]

What young woman doesn't dream of herself as being alluring, charming, compelling, enchanting, fascinating, mesmeric, seductive, spellbinding, and stunning?

When a single man finds a single woman who he thinks is thoroughly beautiful, inside and out, and he can convey to her in words exactly how he feels, the woman will find his words irresistible if he persists. He is the key and she is the lock and sincere words make it all work.

Most trouble comes from not knowing what to say.

.





.

[Sándor Petőfi]

Originally Posted by natsocnet

Sándor Petőfi

I asked you to prove your assertion; not to deliver another dump load of B grade opinionated crap. Don't waste my time.

Don't bother to respond. You'll get no further reply.

I did prove the assertion you asked me to prove: Makow is a subversive thinker. Now you're running with your tail between your legs, you 50 IQ moron.

[Sándor Petőfi]

Originally Posted by natsocnet

Sure... whatever

This is the only sort of reply this idiot can put together.

Originally Posted by Sándor Petőfi

That is only part of the picture, because promiscuity by itself cannot do this. Indeed, promiscuity had never before been an issue for men. No, the problem is that of unmarried men, and this is a result, partly, of men being no longer able to satisfy their drives within the context of marriage. Under ridiculous notions of sexual equality, modernity has redefined adultery as

Voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse.

whereas adultery meant

Sexual intercourse between a man and another man's wife.

as we can see from the KJV

Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbor's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.

Here are just two examples of how this monogomania destroys the family:

Young men are hesitant to marry because marriage, under Judeo-Christian law, means a stifling of their natural drives. In the past European men circumvented this inconvenience de facto by taking mistresses. This is no longer feasible because a) it is no longer socially acceptable, b) wives are now in positions of power over their husbands, which together give us the fact that any straying from the path means a waving of divorce papers. Thus families are not formed.

As already implied, women now expect their husbands to be monogamous. This reflects social norms rather than nature, although a women is naturally competitive and giving her power yields the desired result: miserable men or divorced men. Thus families are torn apart.

Thank you, an apt observation. It is, in fact, adultery and not sexual promiscuity we must fight. Perhaps, these two words, sexual promiscuity, would be better to be left out of the WN lexicon.

[Charlie-Horse]

Originally Posted by fdtwainth

Thank you, an apt observation. It is, in fact, adultery and not sexual promiscuity we must fight. Perhaps, these two words, sexual promiscuity, would be better to be left out of the WN lexicon.

Why are you concerned that we are being bred out of existence by the MUD races? Or are you just concerned with your own personal gratification, your own deviant needs?

I don't really agree with promiscuity I think it's dirty, cheap, and makes women dirty used whores. I think it's foul but I can also see that under some extreme circumstance that it is sometimes a necessary evil.

I think the Jew likes to see us behave in an immoral way and be promiscuous, they like us to become cheap, to become like them, without morals and without decency.

I notice that the Jew inspired rock and roll bands always promote it, I see a Jew in the background 'jacking off' to the thought of us debasing ourselves and them turning a profit from it.

[Contumacyman]

Brutus wrote: "the woman will find his words irresistible if he persists"
So true. I used to always ask my older aunts and family female friends how they got togehter with their husbands, and they all said it was because "he had a line, and I fell for it".
When a man knows what to say (sometimes being humorous does the trick), women are drawn to such a man and want more. Some men just have a knack for it, and, being a handsome devil helps but is not essential - having an irresistable "line" is what trumps all other considerations. Some of my aunts still remembered (in their old old age) the line that their husbands used to win them over as teenagers (aeons ago). It is the "key" that unlocks the door to their soul.