|
July 17th, 2012 | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
|
July 17th, 2012 | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
|
July 17th, 2012 | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
|
Quote:
That's right, according to the Christian Identity followers, the Afro-Asiatic Hebrews were White, just like Europeans - in fact, according to Christian Identity, Europeans are the "True Israelites" being descended from the lost tribes of the Hebrews. Jews, on the other hand, are Turkish imposters that only claim to be Israelites, according to Christian Identity doctrine. C.I. declares that all the Jews are desceded from Khazar Turks that converted to Judaism by the 9th century AD. and that the Khazars are the spawn of Satan. The Turkish Khazars did in fact convert to Judaism as their state religion, as many Jews had already settled in the territory occupied by the Khazars; but the majority of the Jewish people have been genetically proven to be of Semitic descent and originated in the Levant. Christian Identity followers refuse to acknowledge such facts, however and only stick with the evidence that they can warp and twist to support their own desperate attempts to prove that the god they live in fear of is White, so that their worship of Yahweh and Jesus, does not conflict with their own White racial separatist ideology; even though it requires serious acrobatics of the mind to contrive. Last edited by Steven L. Akins; July 17th, 2012 at 04:36 PM. |
|
July 17th, 2012 | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 6,145
|
Thanks, Steve. Much appreciated.
|
August 21st, 2012 | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 926
|
Atheist Billboards Outrage Charlotte NC Residents
An atheist group in Charlotte, N.C., put up two huge billboards Monday ridiculing Christianity and Mormonism. The billboard against Christianity calls God "sadistic" and "useless," while the display against Mormonism calls God a "space alien." "David Silverman, president of American Atheists, said the controversy is exactly what he expected. http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2012/A...te-Residents-/ |
October 3rd, 2012 | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Price of hate: Radical Israeli settlers vandalize Christian monastery
OCT.2012
Radical Jewish settlers vandalized a Christian church outside of Jerusalem, spray-painting “Jesus is a bastard” and “price tag” on its outer door. Such attacks have been on the rise despite police promises to curb hate crimes in the Holy Land. http://rt.com/news/christian-monaste...jerusalem-510/ |
December 12th, 2012 | #27 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Vandals Spray Hate Graffiti on Jerusalem Church
Quote:
|
|
May 31st, 2013 | #28 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Jerusalem church built at Virgin Mary’s holy site vandalized
Quote:
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...#ixzz2Utzr09CK |
|
August 22nd, 2013 | #29 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Molotov cocktail thrown at monastery outside Belt-Shemesh
Quote:
http://www.jpost.com/National-News/M...Shemesh-323777 |
|
September 20th, 2013 | #30 |
Administrator
|
rabbi says "good" that europe is overrun by islamics
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...18#post1596818 |
September 21st, 2013 | #31 | |
Jews are not superior
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA - House of Babylonia where greed, immigration and homosexuality flourishes and the jews love it.
Posts: 1,609
|
Quote:
The true reason "Christ" exists according to the Christians has been dismissed by many and greatly misunderstood by others, except of course the jews. The jews know all too well the meaning of Christ. According to the Bible, Christ was sent here born as a jew. Christ actually represented the "victim" the jews are so bent on denying his true idealogical existence. Jews to get attention cry, "victim," many times. Christ was to be the mockery of the jews and their crying, "victimhood," which many Christians have overlooked and while many other non-jews have not figured out. All in all, "God" despises the jews and has successfully made a mockery out of the jews, which the jews have fervently either deny there was a "Christ" or call him a "fraud" or have called him a "bastard" and have called the virgin Mary a "whore." Many still wonder why that is. The jews want to hide their blatant and deliberate cries of "victim" so that no one will figure out how they get away with murder, bullying, destroying nations/societies, destroying worldwide financial and economic systems, and how they blatantly get away with international crimes, while the UN and other nations turn a blind eye and never prosecute Israeli leaders for war crimes and sanction that country for illegally building settlements while displacing and killing Palestinians. The Palestinians and Muslims are true believers of "God." This is why the jews so hate them and anyone who is born of the Christian faith and will do anything to destroy them and their nations. Ya'll get it now? Pontius Pilate was the only one in biblical times to figure out the true intentions of the jews when they brought "Christ" before him as a fraud. He knew the jews wanted to rid him and his iconic existence because he threatened the very existence of the jewish population and their agendas to destroy the world. In turn he had "Christ" executed, the one who represented the "victim" as the jews many times represent. How are the jews treated in modern times? Instead of being executed as the menacing, murdering thugs they are, they are held in high regard while they are allowed to cry, "victim" and are protected and are called "friends."
__________________
A jew can't handle "truth" with dignity, but refutes with lies of exaggeration. Jews -- tall, tall, tall, tales they tell. Famous fairytale storytellers of the Holocaust. |
|
October 9th, 2013 | #32 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Attack on Jerusalem graves unnerves Christians
Quote:
|
|
March 31st, 2014 | #33 |
Administrator
|
JAMES Q. WILSON
Why Don’t Jews Like the Christians Who Like Them? Liberalism can’t abide conservative evangelicals. Albrecht Durer's Revelation of St. John, 1498. In the United States, the two groups that most ardently support Israel are Jews and evangelical and fundamentalist Christians. Jewish support is easy to explain, but why should certain Christians, most of them politically quite conservative, be so devoted to Israel? There is a second puzzle: despite their support for a Jewish state, evangelical and fundamentalist Christians are disliked by many Jews. And a third: a large fraction of African-Americans are hostile to Israel and critical of Jews, yet Jewish voters regard blacks as their natural allies. The evidence about evangelical attitudes is clear. In 2006, a Pew survey found that evangelical Christians were more favorable toward Israel than the average American was—and much more sympathetic than either mainline Protestants or secularists. In another survey, evangelical Christians proved much likelier than Catholics, Protestants, or secular types to back Israeli control of Jerusalem, endorse Israeli settlements on the West Bank, and take Israel’s side in a Middle Eastern dispute. (Among every religious group, those who are most traditional are most supportive of Israel. The most orthodox Catholics and Protestants, for instance, support Israel more than their modernist colleagues do.) Evangelical Christians have a high opinion not just of the Jewish state but of Jews as people. That Jewish voters are overwhelmingly liberal doesn’t seem to bother evangelicals, despite their own conservative politics. Yet Jews don’t return the favor: in one Pew survey, 42 percent of Jewish respondents expressed hostility to evangelicals and fundamentalists. As two scholars from Baruch College have shown, a much smaller fraction—about 16 percent—of the American public has similarly antagonistic feelings toward Christian fundamentalists. The reason that conservative Christians—opposed to abortion and gay marriage and critical of political liberalism—can feel kindly toward Jewish liberals and support Israel so fervently is rooted in theology. One finds among fundamentalist Protestants a doctrine called dispensationalism. The dispensationalist outlook, which began in early-nineteenth-century England, sees human history as a series of seven periods, or dispensations, in each of which God deals with man in a distinctive way. The first, before Adam’s fall, was the era of innocence; the second, from Adam to Noah, the era of conscience; the third, from Noah to Abraham, of government; the fourth, from Abraham to Moses, of patriarchy; the fifth, from Moses to Jesus, of Mosaic law; and the sixth, from Jesus until today, of grace. The seventh and final dispensation, yet to come, will be the Millennium, an earthly paradise. For dispensationalists, the Jews are God’s chosen people. For the Millennium to come, they must be living in Israel, whose capital is Jerusalem; there, the Temple will rise again at the time of Armageddon. On the eve of that final battle, the Antichrist will appear—probably in the form of a seeming peacemaker. Fundamentalists differ over who the Antichrist will be (at one time he was thought to be Nero, at another time the papacy, and today a few have suggested the secretary-general of the United Nations), but dispensationalists agree that he will deceive the people, occupy the Temple, rule in the name of God, and ultimately be defeated by the Messiah. Many dispensationalists believe that how a person treats Israel will profoundly influence his eternal destiny. Christian dispensationalists were early Zionists and continue to support Israel today, for it is there that they believe Christ will return. In 1878, William Blackstone, a well-known dispensationalist and the author of Jesus Is Coming, wrote a document that argued for a Jewish state in Palestine. It appeared in 1891, five years before Theodor Herzl called for a Jewish state and six years before the first Zionist Congress. Blackstone got more than 400 dignitaries to sign his document, including the chief justice of the Supreme Court, the Speaker of the House, John D. Rockefeller, J. P. Morgan, and several other prominent Americans, almost all of them Christians. After President Benjamin Harrison ignored the petition, Blackstone tried again in 1916 with President Woodrow Wilson, who was more sympathetic—and who supported the British foreign minister, Arthur Balfour, a devout Protestant, when in 1917 he issued his famous declaration calling for a Jewish home in Palestine. Evangelical and fundamentalist Christian preachers enthusiastically promote this pro-Israel vision. In a study of preachers in 19 denominations, political scientist James Guth of Furman University found that evangelicals were much likelier to back Israel in their sermons than mainline Protestants or Catholics were, a difference that persisted after controlling for age, sex, party identification, and type of media used to reach congregations. Guth also showed that self-described evangelicals who attended church regularly, and thus heard their ministers’ sermons, were much more inclined to support Israel than were believers who did not attend regularly. Evangelical preachers are reinforced by popular Christian books. In 1970, Hal Lindsey published The Late Great Planet Earth; in 1995, Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins followed with Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth’s Last Days, and went on to write 11 more volumes on the same theme. Lindsey can claim more than 35 million sales, and the Left Behind books have sold 60 million. These bestsellers tell the dispensationalist story, discuss Armageddon, and argue for the protection of Jews and of Israel. Lindsey argues that, based on the book of Revelations and related biblical sources, “some time in the future,” there will be “a seven-year period climaxed by the visible return of Jesus Christ” but that this will not happen until the Jewish people have reestablished their nation in their ancient homeland. Whatever one makes of his prediction, Lindsey is unambiguous about the importance of Israel to him—and, by extension, to his millions of readers. Reinforcing the preachers and writers are various pro-Israel evangelical organizations, including Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and the National Christian Leadership Conference for Israel. Mainstream Protestant groups, such as the National Council of Churches and the Middle East Council of Churches, have a very different attitude toward Israel. The NCC, for example, refused to support Israel during the Six-Day War in 1967, and immediately afterward began to protest victorious Israel’s expansion of its territory. From that point on, the NCC’s positions ran closely with Arab opinion, urging American contact with the Palestine Liberation Organization, for instance, and denouncing the Camp David Accords because they supposedly ignored the Palestinians’ national ambitions. In 2004, the Presbyterian Church decided to study a proposal to divert its investments from firms doing business with Israel. Within a year, the Episcopal Church, the United Church of Christ, and parts of the Methodist Church followed suit. As Paul Charles Merkley sums up in his book about Christian Zionism, mainline Protestant churches’ “respectable leadership had backed away from Israel; all of her constant friends were seated below the salt.” Why do mainline Protestant leaders oppose Israel? That question becomes harder to answer when one recalls that Israel is a democratic nation with vigorously independent courts that has not only survived brutal attacks by its Arab neighbors but provided a prosperous home for the children of many Holocaust survivors. As with any other nation, Israel has pursued policies that one can challenge. Some may criticize its management of the West Bank, for example, or its attacks on Hamas leaders. But these concerns are trivial compared with Iran’s announced desire to wipe Israel off the map by using every weapon at its disposal, including (eventually) a nuclear one. The answer, I think, is that many Christian liberals see Israel as blocking the aspirations of the oppressed—who, they have decided, include the Palestinians. Never mind that the Palestinians support suicide bombers and rocket attacks against Israel; never mind that the Palestinians cannot form a competent government; never mind that they wish to occupy Israel “from the sea to the river.” It is enough that they seem oppressed, even though much of the oppression is self-inflicted. After the Marxist claims about the proletariat proved false and capitalism was vindicated as the best way to achieve economic affluence, leftists had to stop pretending that they could accomplish much with state-owned factories and national economic plans. As a result, the oppressed replaced the proletariat as the Left’s object of affection. The enemy became, not capitalists, but successful nations. That shift in focus has received encouragement from certain American academics, such as Noam Chomsky, and from the European press, including the BBC, the Guardian, the Evening Standard, and Le Monde. All tend to denounce Israel in the most unrestrained terms. When Israeli ground forces sought to root out terrorists hiding in a Jenin refugee camp, they lost 23 soldiers and killed 52 Palestinians. Among other press critics, the British writer A. N. Wilson, uninterested in the facts, called the episode a “massacre” and a “genocide.” The Left will always have its enemies; Israel has merely replaced John D. Rockefeller at the top of the list. But why do so many Jewish groups and voters abhor their Christian evangelical allies? To answer that question carefully, we would need data that distinguish among Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, and secular Jews. It is quite possible that Orthodox Jews welcome evangelical support while Reform and secular ones oppose it, but I could find no data on which to base a firm conclusion. Most Jews are political liberals, devoted to the Democratic Party and liberal causes generally. As Milton Himmelfarb once put it, “Jews earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.” Such voting habits are not hard to explain in a population that historically includes victims of discrimination, oppression, and mass murder. By contrast, evangelicals tend to be conservatives to whom politics seems less important than their dispensationalist beliefs. That liberal politics trumps other considerations—including worries about anti-Semitism—for many American Jews becomes clearer in light of other data. The most anti-Semitic group in America is African-Americans. This wasn’t always the case. Many early black leaders, including W. E. B. Du Bois and Ralph Bunche, were quite supportive of American Jews. Du Bois even criticized Bunche for being “insufficiently pro-Zionist.” The NAACP endorsed the creation of Israel in 1948, and the Jewish state received continued support from Paul Robeson, Bayard Rustin, and Martin Luther King, Jr. But by the time of the 1967 war, much of that leadership had left the scene. Stokely Carmichael, H. Rap Brown, James Forman, Malcolm X, and Shirley Du Bois (widow of W. E. B. Du Bois) were critical of Israel. At a New Left convention in the late 1960s, black delegates insisted on passing a resolution condemning the “imperialist Zionist war.” Nowadays, according to several polls, about one-third of U.S. blacks have very anti-Semitic attitudes, and this hasn’t changed since at least 1964, when the first such poll was conducted. And it has been African-American leaders, not white evangelicals, who have made anti-Semitic remarks most conspicuously. Everyone recalls Jesse Jackson’s reference to New York as “Hymietown,” to say nothing of Louis Farrakhan, a great admirer of Hitler, who has called Jews “bloodsuckers.” Yet African-American voters are liberals, and so often get a pass from their Jewish allies. To Jews, blacks are friends and evangelicals enemies, whatever their respective dispositions toward Jews and Israel. But another reason, deeper than Jewish and evangelical differences over abortion, school prayer, and gay marriage, may underlie Jewish dislike of Christian fundamentalists. Though evangelical Protestants are supportive of Israel and tolerant of Jews, in the eyes of their liberal critics they are hostile to the essential elements of a democratic regime. They believe that the United States was founded as a Christian nation and worry about the decay of morality; they must wish, therefore, to impose a conservative moral code, alter the direction of the country so that it conforms to God’s will, require public schools to teach Christian beliefs, and crush the rights of minorities. Christian Smith, a sociology professor at the University of North Carolina, analyzed four surveys of self-identified evangelicals and found that, while they do think that America was founded as a Christian nation and fear that the country has lost its moral bearings, these views are almost exactly the same as those held by non-evangelical Americans. Evangelicals, like other Americans, oppose having public schools teach Christian values, oppose having public school teachers lead students in vocal prayers, and oppose a constitutional amendment declaring the country a Christian nation. Evangelicals deny that there is one correct Christian view on most political issues, deny that Jews must answer for allegedly killing Christ, deny that laws protecting free speech go too far, and reject the idea that whites should be able to keep blacks out of their neighborhoods. They overwhelmingly agree that Jews and Christians share the same values and can live together in harmony. Evangelicals strongly oppose abortion and gay marriage, but in almost every other respect are like other Americans. Whatever the reason for Jewish distrust of evangelicals, it may be a high price to pay when Israel’s future, its very existence, is in question. Half of all Protestants in the country describe themselves as evangelical, or born-again, Christians, making up about one-quarter of all Americans (though they constitute only 16 percent of white Christian voters in the Northeast). Jews, by contrast, make up less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, and that percentage will shrink: as many as half of all Jews marry non-Jews. When it comes to helping secure Israel’s survival, the tiny Jewish minority in America should not reject the help offered by a group that is ten times larger and whose views on the central propositions of a democratic society are much like everybody else’s. No good can come from repeating the 1926 assertion of H. L. Mencken that fundamentalist Christians are “yokels” and “morons.” James Q. Wilson, formerly a professor at Harvard and at UCLA, now lectures at Pepperdine University. In 2003 he was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award. His article is adapted from a Manhattan Institute lecture. http://www.city-journal.org/2008/18_...TKwmu8.twitter |
April 1st, 2014 | #34 |
Administrator
|
Extremist Jews Vandalize Israeli Catholic Convent in Price Tag Outrage
Graffiti Blasts Christians and U.S.-Led Peace Talks By JTA Published April 01, 2014. A Catholic monastery near Beit Shemesh was vandalized with anti-American and anti-Christian epithets. “America is Nazi Germany” and “Price Tag — Peace Agreement,” as well as “Jesus is a monkey” and “Mary is a cow,” were spray painted on the walls of the monastery. The tires of four vehicles also were slashed. The monastery is located in Deir a-Rafat village located close to Kibbutz Tzora near Beit Shemesh. The vandalism was discovered by monks on Tuesday morning; Jerusalem police are investigating. Price tag refers to the strategy adopted by extremist settlers and their supporters generally to exact retribution for settlement freezes and demolitions or Palestinian attacks on Jews. Other monasteries in the area have been victims of suspected price tag attacks in the past. http://forward.com/articles/195603/e...holic-convent/ Read more: http://forward.com/articles/195603/e...#ixzz2xgXd7Znq |
April 2nd, 2014 | #35 |
Administrator
|
hoffman comments on desecration in last post
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bwg8...NhTnk2VGc/edit |
May 20th, 2014 | #36 |
...
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,744
|
Jew's don't respect you, christian dupes, no matter how much of their mythology you adhere to, or how many jew asses you kiss.
--- http://time.com/101785/popes-upcomin...s-on-churches/ comments: http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/co...es_to_welcome/ Pope’s Upcoming Visit to Holy Land Marred By Attacks on Churches Israeli officials blame Jewish extremists for the surge in anti-Christian vandalism As the Israeli government prepares to welcome Pope Francis on his first visit as Pope later this month, vandals have scrawled hate-filled graffiti at some Christian sites. “Jesus is garbage,” “Death to Christians” and “We will crucify you” are among the messages that have been spray-painted on the walls of Christian churches and monasteries in Israel in recent weeks. Although no arrests have been made, Israeli officials say they suspect Jewish extremists of being behind the vandalism. Israeli officials link the surge to the Pope’s visit, which appears to have ignited resentment toward Christianity by some Israeli Jews. A small minority of Israeli Jews blames Christians for past violence by Christians against Jews and for what they perceive as ongoing attempts to convert Jews to Christianity. Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said most of the perpetrators act individually: “It’s not like dealing with a terror organization.” Pope Francis’ three-day visit starts in Jordan on May 24. He then travels to Bethlehem in the West Bank, and Jerusalem, where he will visit Yad Vashem, the museum commemorating victims of the Holocaust. The trip was scheduled to commemorate the 50th anniversary of rapprochement between Pope Paul VI and the leader of the Orthodox Christian church. Publicity over the church attacks – not seen before previous papal visits – has some Israelis asking why it’s happening now. “The question to ask is what kind of Israeli state do we want here? Our educational challenge is to promote respect to the other,” says Amnon Ramon, a specialist on Christianity at the Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, an independent think tank. Amos Oz, perhaps Israel’s most celebrated author, called the extremists “Hebrew neo-Nazis” at a public event, adding that perpetrators “enjoy the backing of numerous nationalist lawmakers — maybe even racist — and also rabbis who give them a foundation that is, in my opinion, pseudo-religious.” Oz’s remarks stirred up a fresh wave of debate and name-calling, an unwelcome drum-roll for a papal visit intended to celebrate the overcoming of historical enmities. |
September 22nd, 2014 | #37 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
“The Christian Fundamentalists who send them money apparently don’t understand what they are dealing with.”
http://incogman.net/2013/06/let-a-je...the-real-deal/ |
September 23rd, 2014 | #38 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,236
|
“The Christian Fundamentalists who send them money apparently don’t understand what they are dealing with.”
http://incogman.net/2013/06/let-a-je...the-real-deal/ Thread is redirected ...anyone else?
__________________
Experience molds perception. Last edited by Alexander M.; September 23rd, 2014 at 05:43 PM. |
September 24th, 2014 | #39 |
Christian Anti-Semite
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kikesville, Hymietown
Posts: 251
|
Why do you think the jews invented and perpetuate the holohoax myth? It's all about making the Christians feel guilty about how the poor, "persecuted" jews were treated so that they'll continue to support the sewer of the Middle East, a.k.a. Israhell, with their hard-earned money. It's all part of the jewish swindle to cheat the Christians out of their money while the kikes are enjoying themselves ... all the way to the bank.
__________________
No jews, no problems. Never trust a jew. |
September 24th, 2014 | #40 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Quote:
|
|
Tags |
christianity, christians, israel |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|