|
January 15th, 2014 | #1 |
Administrator
|
#1 Atheist / Rat Thread
'Rat' is my term for my beliefs, as concerns things irrational taken seriously by cloudy thinkers and professional conmen. It stands for one who believes that rational thinking is effective mentation in every sphere of human activity and conjecture.
A term is necessary to escape the politicization of 'atheism,' which if not begun as a slur was turned into one by the church, and then proudly claimed by vile leftists, though there is no necessary connection between the one position atheism takes and leftism as a whole. It's actually the opposite - atheism fits the right-wing view of the world better than the left. It is my view, as a rat, nay as The Rat, as King Rat, as Primus Inter (Rat) Pares, that atheism is a term unnecessary save for the irrationalist, which is to say religious, majority - they need a way to focus their hate, and 'atheist' provides it. 'Atheism' is a strawman - because the rejection of the assertion about a supernatural God made by christians does not amount to a belief system, as suggested by the -ism, not any more than a rejection of someone's assertion of the reality of Santa Claus amounts to a belief system. Some atheists call themselves 'clears,' more recently. This smacks of leftism in that it's a patting of oneself on the back for being sharper, better, whatever than one's opponent. While that may be the case, it is lip-curlingly gauche to praise oneself, which is what the term amounts to. So I am a rat, and a proud and happy rat. Anyone opposed, take it up with this guy: Anyway, this thread will be for data about atheists, as the majority call their strawman, and the majority reaction to them. Last edited by Alex Linder; January 15th, 2014 at 12:36 AM. |
January 15th, 2014 | #2 |
Administrator
|
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3346201.html
Vatican Clarifies Pope's 'Atheist' Remarks [CORRECTED] Shortly after Pope Francis gave an homily in which he said even atheists who do good are redeemed, a statement from a Vatican spokesman clarified the pope's remarks. Just one day after the pope's now famous words in Rome on May 22, a Vatican spokesman the Rev. Thomas Rosica released a statement quoting a section of the Catechism of the Catholic Church that says people who reject the teachings of Jesus Christ cannot attain salvation. "All salvation comes from Christ, the Head, through the Church which is his body," Rosica wrote. "Hence they cannot be saved who, knowing the Church as founded by Christ and necessary for salvation, would refuse to enter her or remain in her." Thanks for the warning, meatball. However, Rosica wrote that it's not impossible for an atheist to eventually be saved by Christ. “Rejection of Christianity may not mean the rejection of Christ,” he wrote. "We can never say with ultimate certainty whether a non-Christian who has rejected Christianity...is still following the temporary path mapped out for his own salvation which is leading him to an encounter with God.” Things that can't be nailed down because they, well, are imaginary, are very flexible and supple, like an Ugly Stick (TM). They bend to the temper of the times, or the political needs of pope. Rosica's statement was written in response to the many calls and messages he received after Francis' controversial homily. The Catholic Church defines redemption and salvation differently: while everyone is redeemed through the death of Jesus Christ, salvation is offered by God and can be either accepted or rejected individually. In his homily, the pope said everyone, "even the atheists," have been redeemed "with the Blood of Christ," according to Vatican Radio. This is a grown man spouting this silliness. A grown man with no conception of his own ridiculousness. Speaking with great authority about things that do not exist. It's funny for those with eyes to see and ears to hear. "If we, each doing our own part, if we do good to others, if we meet there, doing good, and we go slowly, gently, little by little, we will make that culture of encounter," Francis said. "We must meet one another doing good. 'But I don't believe, Father, I am an atheist!' But do good: we will meet one another there." The Vatican's statement seemed to attempt to do damage control for Francis' remarks, emphasizing that his job is more to speak well than to provide an indisputable interpretation of the Bible. "[Pope Francis] is first and foremost a seasoned pastor and preacher who has much experience in reaching people," the statement said. "His words are not spoken in the context of a theological faculty or academy nor in interreligious dialogue or debate." (h/t Christian Post) Correction: A previous version of this article asserted that Rosica had said that atheists cannot be saved, and attributed the quotation from the Catechism to Rosica. Last edited by Alex Linder; January 15th, 2014 at 12:29 AM. |
January 15th, 2014 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
If anyone asks me, I'll just say I don't believe in the gods imagined by men. And if anyone asks why, then I'll say show me a single person on the planet that can prove the existence of any god.
The question of whether there is or isn't a higher level power that would fit man's definition of what a god might be is a completely different question than whether I think gods imagined by men are actually real. I'm not sure anyone will ever know the answer to the first part. I'm not going to get defensive about being called an Atheist, and if someone pushes the envelope with that label, I'll immediately own up to it for the same reason I'll own up to being a racist, or an antisemite. Even if you call yourself something else, there still might be people who will confront you about it and say "You're still technically an Atheist, right?". At the end of the day, I really don't give a shit what people think. A new neighbor moved in 2 houses down, and he went around knocking on doors introducing himself to the neighborhood. Which is fine, and its a friendly White thing to do. The problem is, he started leaving trash on my doorstep in the form of kwaristian leaflets. And I happened to see him the next day, walking up the road with a few leaflets in his hand that matched the one on my doorstep. At first I tried to not be rude to the guy, and told him that being courteous to your neighbors involves not imposing your religious beliefs on them. He starts mumbling about christ this, christ that, and after about 10 seconds of listening to that shit I had lost my patience with the guy, and told him "what part of me not believing in your dead jew on a stick don't you fucking understand?" He mumbled, yo yo you're an Atheist!! And I said, yeah, so don't drop your trash off at my doorstep again. Never seen the guy again, and I don't even think hes been dropping leaflets around my area anymore. Last edited by Crowe; January 15th, 2014 at 01:06 AM. |
January 15th, 2014 | #4 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
January 15th, 2014 | #5 |
Switching to glide
|
Religion would be hilarious if it wasn't so fucking dangerous.
All religions are basically cults who believe varying levels of some fairly dubious shit. Talking snakes, people returning from the dead, have you ever read The Bible? I mean not just skim it, but truly get in there, not only the Cliff Notes quotations people bandy about when someone dies? There's some crazy stuff in there. My opinion is that a certain percentage of Homo sapiens have a genetic predisposition to believe weird/outlandish stuff. They're easily influenced. Easily lead. Easily exploited. Perhaps it's linked to an overall general lower intelligence? The brightest in any religion are using it as a tool. They're either making a living off the flock, or somehow bending it to suit an ulterior motive.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder |
January 15th, 2014 | #6 | |
Switching to glide
|
Quote:
I would've just thrown the religious tracts in the trash. Make a mental note to wear a Black Sabbath T-shirt next time I might run into the guy. I wouldn't have stopped him on the road. It's a semi-free country and if he wants to spend his day promoting the all-hits album from Mathew, Mark, Luke & John, I got better shit to do. /shrug
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #7 |
MIA
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Off the reservation
Posts: 2,639
|
Christians are delicious |
January 15th, 2014 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,431
|
Quote:
White christians are pretty fat and happy, as people go. The white christians I know are the white atheist's smallest threat. They're all like "oh well, god blessim anyway" I bet you have some personal family experience with that and it drives you up a wall.
__________________
No time for the old in 'n out, love. I've just come to read the meter. |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 974
|
The opposite of ATHEISM (no spiritual) is THEISM (spiritual).
Did you atheists ever read short book who wrote William Pierce (educated man)-CosmoTHEISM? If you red this,what is your opinion about this theism? I see here mention of the Vatican. Vatican is state within a state,they don't promote real Romancatolicism,he (Vatican) is globalist branch who have own agents who promotes interests only one states-Vatican he only care about his own state. Secularism is the answer for this with ideology who promote interests for defend race,nation and state. People like people-they have right for belive in spiritual but let they consetracion on they own race,nation and state and not on priests (any other religion),because people tuday know how to read what some religion say and priests are not required. P.S. Alex,I can sense wich religion lies on you posts Why? I red your theme when you past chapter one book wich I read,chapter is "Racial history in Haiti" (thereabouts). Last edited by Fico; January 15th, 2014 at 02:07 PM. |
January 15th, 2014 | #10 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 8,089
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Crowe; January 15th, 2014 at 01:58 PM. |
||
January 15th, 2014 | #11 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews. |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #12 |
Senior Member
|
Pierce was aware of a higher power which moved towards spiritual awareness, a pretty logical idea considering evolution, itself, is moving upwards, from unthinking molecules towards ever higher levels of conscious complexity.
__________________
Vladimir Putin's Russia is being attacked by the very same forces that attacked Hitler's Germany, namely the Jews. The fate of the world hangs on Putin defeating the Jews. |
January 15th, 2014 | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,431
|
Quote:
Hey Alex, they're a-comin to getchoo
__________________
No time for the old in 'n out, love. I've just come to read the meter. |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Theist means a person that believes in God or gods. An Atheist is someone that doesn't. I don't like this word.
If someone asked me what my race was, I wouldn't say, non-black. If someone asked me my political leanings, I wouldn't say non-progressive. It sounds smart-alecky and evasive. We don't define things in the negative. |
January 15th, 2014 | #15 |
Witness to Genocide
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Where there are no PAKIS and NIGGERS
Posts: 823
|
I'm a militant atheist, but I don't like the word "rat." Rat conjures up images of informers, snitches and ZOG bots.
Alternative designations such as physicalist and/or (scientific) materialist are much better and far more accurate terms IMO. |
January 15th, 2014 | #16 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
|
|
January 15th, 2014 | #17 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
The jebus cultists already hate and distrust atheists. That won't change. Have fun with it. That's how I look at it. But the biggest point is that one is hardly DEFINED by rejecting ONE assertion that aint true, even if the assertion is made by millions of people. Whereas, to many cultists, the cult is their whole life. It gives them a context and meaning. I think they're pathetic and wrong, but they really think they've got something. |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #18 | |
Administrator
|
Quote:
At a higher level, I reap the meta lesson that the world evolves by irony. Raised in the ultimate WASPy 'high-minded' world of reality-is-whatever-you-make-it, characterized, most famously, by the CS belief that sickness is a result of bad thinking, it produced the opposite of its intentions in me. I abstracted a larger lesson from this, and from other things I've observed: things in this world tend to produce their opposite. That's what I take the yin/yang symbol to mean. At least, it's a good visual representation of that idea, whatever the Easterners intend by it, which I don't know and have not studied. If you mean to produce a particular effect in this world, you must be extremely careful you do not produce the opposite, because it is very, very easy to do. I think I produce the effect I intend. But I collect high-quality comment about my work, and more than one insists that I have driven people away from racialism. It's an odd world, to be sure. But I have never found reality tricking me. I can say with 99.9% certainty there is no God, but I can say with 100% certainty that if there is a god, he is not at all as the christians depict him - loving. He is sadistic, perverted and twisted - a god of sniggering irony. This is visible in 1000 ways, but you have to have something of an artistic streak (a sensitivity to how effects are produced) and a sense of humor - and christians are notoriously humorless. Anyone who can read the book of Revelation without laughing and chucking the thing across the room - is qualified to be a christian. Not qualified to be a human, though. It really is a disgusting cult, and, as I maintain, the worst thing that ever happened to our race. Unfortunately, a genetic proneness to gullibility in too many of our people probably must take the ultimate 'blame.' Whites need to become a sharper instrument, and, per the irony principle that seems to guide the world, the jewish attempt to genocide our race may in fact simply winnow it and produce a race with a much higher percentage of VNN types. That's usually how things work. Last edited by Alex Linder; January 16th, 2014 at 12:52 AM. |
|
January 15th, 2014 | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,139
|
I don't mind the term Atheist. Despite it having been co-opted by the enemy, and despite it's vunerability to circular logic, Atheist is nevertheless simple and established, and requires no lengthy explanation.
|
Tags |
#1 |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|