|
|
February 12th, 2008 | #1 |
Administrator
|
Australian Aborigines
Australia's Aborigines: A Timeline
Published: February 12, 2008 A timeline of key dates and facts about Australia's Aborigines: _ 1788 British settlers establish a penal colony in Sydney, leading to skirmishes between the colonialists and local Aboriginal clans. Aborigines are believed to have numbered about 750,000 at the time of settlement and to have inhabited Australia for up to 70,000 years. _ 1789 The first cases of smallpox, brought by the settlers, are reported among Aborigines and kill hundreds. _ 1791 Officials grant parcels of land around Sydney to convicts who have served their time, beginning years of dispossession of Aborigines that continues as white settlers disperse throughout Australia. Clashes between Aborigines and settlers lead to tens of thousands of deaths among Aborigines and hundreds of settler deaths. _ Jan. 1, 1901 The Commonwealth of Australia is formed, but the constitution excludes Aborigines from the national census, leaving them to be considered "fauna." _ 1910 State governments introduce policies to remove mixed-blood Aboriginal children from their families, arguing the children would be better off because the race now estimated at around 60,000 nationally was doomed to extinction. _ 1937 Assimilation of mixed-blood Aborigines by force if necessary is adopted as official policy at a meeting of federal and state officials, while Aborigines living a "tribal life" are to stay on reserves. _ 1967 In a landmark referendum, Australians vote overwhelmingly in favor of changing the constitution to count Aborigines in the census, effectively granting them voting rights and ending constitutional discrimination. _ 1970 The last laws granting authorities wide powers to take Aboriginal children away from their families are abolished, though many Aborigines say statistics show the government is still more likely to take Aboriginal children into foster care than white children for reasons such as abuse. _1976 The federal government passes legislation granting Aboriginal ownership to large parts of the Northern Territory, kicking off a new movement to reclaim traditional lands. _1992 The highest court rules that Aborigines held a form of ownership to Australia before the settlers arrived, a landmark decision that results in legislative recognition of native title rights over some government-owned lands_ and years of acrimonious debate about the issue. _1997 A national inquiry says policies removing Aboriginal children from their parents caused massive trauma to 100,000 children and their families, and recommends the "stolen generation" be compensated. Prime Minister John Howard refuses an official apology, but hundreds of thousands of Australians attend so-called "Sorry Day" events. _ 2007 Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is elected, and promises a formal apology to those Aborigines taken from their families on behalf of the government. The apology is due in Parliament on Wednesday. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/...s-Timeline.php |
February 12th, 2008 | #2 |
Administrator
|
[Here's an email circulating in Australia in response to the government's official apology to abos (2/13/08). It contains many facts about human subsidies given aborigines.]
AUSTRALIAN APOLOGY TO THE ABORIGINAL POPULATION We apologise for giving you doctors and free medical care, which allows you to survive and multiply so that you can demand apologies. We apologise for helping you to read and teaching you the English language, thus opening up to you the entire European civilisation, thought and enterprise. We feel that we must apologise for building hundreds of homes for you, which you have vandalised and destroyed. We apologise for giving you law and order which has helped prevent you from slaughtering one another and using the unfortunate for food purposes. We apologise for developing large farms and properties, which today feed you, where before, you had the benefits of living off the land and starving during droughts. We apologise for providing you with warm clothing made of fabric to replace the animal skins you used before. We apologise for building roads and railway tracks between cities and building cars so that you no longer have to walk over harsh terrain. We apologise for paying off your vehicles when you fail to pay the instalments. We apologise for giving you free travel anywhere, whenever. We apologise for giving each and every member of your family $100.00 and free travel to attend an aboriginal funeral. We apologise for not charging you rent on any lands when white people have to pay. We apologise for giving you interest free loans. We apologise for developing oil wells and minerals, including gold and diamonds which you never used and had no idea of their value. We apologise for developing Ayers Rock and Kakadu, and handing them over to you so that you get all the money. We apologise for allowing taxpayers money to be paid towards a daughters' wedding ($8,000.00 each daughter). We apologise for giving you $1.7 billion per year for your 250,000 people, which is $48,000.00 per aboriginal man, woman and child. We apologise for working hard to pay taxes that finance your welfare, medical care, education, etc to the tune of $1.2 billion each year. We apologise for you having to approach the aboriginal affairs department to verify the above figures. For the trouble you will have identifying the "uncle toms" in your own community who are getting richer and leaving some of you living in squalor and poverty. We do apologise. We really do. We are only too happy to take back all the above and return you to the paradise of the "outback", whenever you are ready. |
February 12th, 2008 | #3 |
Administrator
|
Aboriginal crime in Australia What is meant by the term, "Aboriginals are over-represented in jails"? The journalists and PR experts working, at taxpayer expense, for the Aboriginal industry have created a number of terms best described as emotive propaganda. One such term is "Aboriginals are over-represented in jails" You wouldn't think they would publicise such a fact. But the propaganda effect has turned a negative into a positive. The term has been picked up and used by the Aboriginal industry, judges and do-gooders to try and make us all feel guilty about jailing any Aboriginal, regardless of the crime. There may be some validity to this term if Aboriginals received longer jail sentences than white offenders. But the reverse is the case. On average, Aboriginals receive 42% shorter jail terms than non-Aboriginals jailed for the same offence (read the article "Judges soft on Aboriginal criminals"). Why are Aboriginals "over-represented" in jails Simply because they commit more crime. According to the University of WA crime research centre, while Aboriginals make up less than 3% of the population, they commit 20% of the violent crime in Western Australia. The research centre also found that one in five assaults, one in three robberies, more than one in three homicides and about one in ten sexual offences are inter-racial. About 93% of those involve Aboriginal offenders and non-Aboriginal victims. That is why Aboriginals are "over-represented" in the criminal justice system. No amount of posturing and emotional blackmail can change the facts. The hidden victims of Aboriginal crime While the judges and do-gooders protect Aboriginal criminals (mainly males) from justice, they help perpetuate violence against Aboriginal women and children The judges and do-gooders should read the following statistics and then hang their heads in shame: * Up to 50 per cent of Aboriginal children are victims of family violence and child abuse * A survey carried out among 120 households in Adelaide found 90 per cent of the women and 84 per cent of the young girls had been raped at some stage of their lives. * In most States, more than 70 per cent of assaults on Aboriginal women are carried out by their husbands or boyfriends * Aboriginal women are 20 times more likely than non-Aboriginal women to be victims of violence Source: The publication, Through Black Eyes, published by the Secretariat of National Aboriginal and Islander Child Care. http://www.australian-news.com.au/aborepresent.htm |
February 12th, 2008 | #4 |
Administrator
|
Judges soft on Aboriginal criminals
Judges sentence Aboriginals to 43% shorter jail terms than the rest of the population If you are an Aboriginal felon then you can expect a jail term 42.8% shorter than a non- Aboriginal convicted for the same offence. The median aggregate sentence length for all offences for Aboriginals is 2 years, versus 3 years and 6 months for non-Aboriginals. These startling figures, as shown in the table below, validate the public perception that judges are soft on Aboriginal criminals. Scales of Injustice Offence (jail terms for non-Abo vs Abo) Homicide 14 years 10 years Assault 2 years 6 months 1 year 6 months Sex offences 6 years 7 years Other against person 3 years 3 months 3 years 3 months Robbery 6 years 5 years 8 months Break and enter 2 years 1 year 11 months Fraud 1 year 8 months 2 years 6 months Theft 1 year 1 year Property damage 3 years 9 months Justice procedures 9 months 9 months Good order offences 4 months 14 months Drug offences 4 years 6 months 2 years 3 months Driving offences 6 months 7 months Other traffic offences 6 months 8 months Other offences 1 year 4 months 9 months All Offences 3 years 6 months 2 years http://www.australian-news.com.au/abosentence.htm |
February 12th, 2008 | #5 |
Administrator
|
The general consensus among scholars for the arrival of humans in Australia is placed at 40,000 to 50,000 years ago with a possible range of up to 70,000 years ago though not as widely supported. The earliest human remains found to date are that of Mungo Man which have been dated at about 40,000 years old.
At the time of first European contact, it has been estimated the absolute minimum pre-1788 population was 315,000, while recent archaeological finds suggest that a population of 750,000 could have been sustained.[8] [Population estimates of non-Whites are typically exaggerated by White-hating academics, in order to magnify the horror of European colonization.] British colonisation of Australia began in Sydney in 1788. The most immediate consequence of British settlement - within weeks of the first colonists' arrival - was a wave of Old World epidemic diseases. Smallpox alone killed more than 50% of the Aboriginal population living in the vicinity of Sydney.[9][10] The second consequence of British settlement was appropriation of land and water resources. The combination of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900. A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes of cities and towns or on lands considered unsuitable for settlement. Many Indigenous people adapted to European culture, working as stock hands or labourers. With the exception of a few in the remote interior, all surviving Indigenous communities gradually became dependent on the settler population for their livelihood. By the early 20th century the Indigenous population had declined to an estimated 150,000 from 190,000.[11] Commonwealth legislation in 1962 specifically gave Aborigines the right to vote in Commonwealth elections. The 1967 referendum allowed the Commonwealth to make laws with respect to Aboriginal people, and for Aboriginal people to be included when the country does a count to determine electoral representation. In the 1971 controversial Gove land rights case, Justice Blackburn ruled that Australia had been terra nullius before British settlement, and that no concept of native title existed in Australian law. In 1972, the Aboriginal Tent Embassy was established on the steps of Parliament House in Canberra. In 1992, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in the Mabo Case, declaring the previous legal concept of terra nullius to be invalid. |
February 12th, 2008 | #6 |
Administrator
|
The present Aboriginal population in Australia is around 460,000, which is about 2,27 % of the total Australian population. They live in all parts of Australia, but there is a large concentration in Queensland.
In 1972, the Aboriginal Land Right Commission was established to investigate how land could be returned to the Aboriginals. This was the first time that the Australian government acknowledged that land was taken away from the Aboriginals and that it was right to give it back. This research was limited to the Northern Territory, which directly fell under the Federal Australian Government. |
February 12th, 2008 | #8 |
Administrator
|
The natural way to report the data below would focus on the extraordinary, by White standards, proclivity for crime the abos exhibit. Academic Broadhurst, predictably, sticks with the jew-leftist convention of portraying protected minority as the victim rather than the perpetrators. Leftists only mention minority groups and crime in two ways: to claim they are overrepresented in prison and as victims of crime. Omitted are the essential facts that they are victims of crimes committed by their own kind, and that they are not overrepresented in prison, they are committing far more jailable offenses, per capita, than other groups. As we see above, the actual fact of the matter is they are punished less heavily than Whites.
Aborigines and Crime in Australia Roderic Broadhurst Crime and Justice, Vol. 21, Ethnicity, Crime and Immigration: Comparative and Cross-National Perspectives (1997), pp. 407-468 This article consists of 62 page(s). Aborigines are: - 16 times more likely in Western Australia to be victims of homicide and - 6.5 times more likely to report crimes against the person to police than are non-Aborigines - 9.2 times more likely to be arrested - 6.2 times more likely to be imprisoned by lower courts - 23.7 times more likely to be imprisoned as an adult - 48 times more likely to be imprisoned as juveniles than non-Aborigines. The increased overrepresentation from arrest to imprisonment appears largely a function of the very high levels of recidivism found among Aborigines: - 88 percent of male Aborigines are rearrested compared with 52 percent of non-Aborigines - 75 percent of Aborigines return to prison at least once compared with 43 percent of non-Aboriginal males. States with a high Aboriginal "cultural strength" and socioeconomic "stress" index are the most punitive. "Cultural strength," "stress," and imprisonment are highly correlated and associated with those states with the most "frontier" characteristics. [Entire article only available in paid archive.] http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=019...TOR-reducePage |
February 15th, 2023 | #9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
|
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
April 7th, 2008 | #10 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: stormfront
Posts: 231
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
June 1st, 2008 | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
|
Aborigines 'don't know rape is illegal'
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599...7-1702,00.html
By Tara Ravens May 28, 2008 06:53pm MORE than 90 per cent of people in Arnhem Land do not understand basic legal concepts, with many Aborigines under the impression that white society is "lawless", a report has found. This has resulted in wrongful imprisonment and "massive confusion", with some communities still unaware that rape is considered illegal, says Richard Trudgen, CEO of the Aboriginal Resource and Development Services (ARDS). In a report titled An Absence of Mutual Respect, researchers spoke to Yolngu people from a cross-section of the community, including interpreters, locals and community leaders. They were quizzed on the 30 most commonly used English legal words such as bail, commit, arrest, charge and guilty. The ARDS report found 95 per cent of Yolngu people were unable to correctly identify their meaning. Only 17 per cent of responses from language professionals were correct while 90 per cent of community leaders, such as ATSIC members, school teachers and council representatives, had no understanding of the terms at all. Ninety-seven per cent of Yolngu people born after 1967 fell into the lowest category of understanding. "This research found that many Aboriginal people from Arnhem Land had little comprehension of what was happening in the legal system," Mr Trudgen said. "This still leads to many outcomes that are unjust and can also be a factor in some people getting into further trouble. "Many elders also believe it is one of the main reasons for increased crime on Aboriginal communities." Mr Trudgen said the results explained the stark over-representation of Aborigines in territory prisons currently over 80 per cent and why increasing numbers of young males were falling foul of the law after moving to large urban centres. "People thought that pleading guilty actually got them through the court quickly and they didn't go to jail," he said. "There is massive confusion out there about white fella law point blank." In conclusion, the report found many Aborigines were disempowered when it came to dealing with the legal system, and it recommended communication programs to bridge the gap. It said Aboriginal people often thought they were functioning within a lawless society because "they don't understand it so they see it as lawless". This can lead to "quite devastating consequences", said Mr Trudgen, who referred to the case of an elder who had asked him if rape was illegal. "When I said yes, he told me `none of our young people know that'. "This is 2008. When are we going to have an emergency response into communication in these communities?" Researchers also interviewed some people in prison. "When they realised what the term guilty meant they were able to identify some of the things that they were convicted of that they never had anything to do with," Mr Trudgen said. |
June 3rd, 2008 | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 602
|
When abos attack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=if_zX2RwRIk A tour of a typical abo household. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzOaGJmK57U
__________________
Multiculturalism is a form of mental AIDS - Exterminance |
May 21st, 2009 | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,109
|
How do abos relate to lebs?
|
June 16th, 2010 | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 27,577
|
Australia plans to change 'racist' policy that restricts how Outback Aborigines spend
Australia plans to change 'racist' policy that restricts how Outback Aborigines spend welfare
http://www.google.com/hostednews/can...5kfXNZKA6pc9wQ CANBERRA, Australia Australia plans to reform a policy criticized as racist for restricting how Outback Aborigines spend their welfare checks by applying it to recipients regardless of ethnicity, the prime minister said Wednesday. The government introduced so-called "income management" into Aboriginal settlements in the remote Northern Territory three years ago. The policy aims to reduce alcohol and drug abuse by withholding part of Aborigines' welfare checks so the money can only be spent on essentials such as food, clothing and rent. It was part of a package of radical measures aimed at tackling rampant sexual abuse of indigenous children. Aborigines are the poorest ethnic group in Australia, and many Aboriginal communities survive almost entirely on welfare. The government wants to extend the spending restrictions to everyone not just Aborigines receiving welfare payments in Northern Territory from July 1, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said Wednesday. People new to welfare will also have their spending restricted if social workers think they need help handling money. The changes will depend on legislation proposed next week to the Senate, where the government holds a minority of seats. The measures will "ensure that more welfare is spent on life's essentials like food, clothes and rent and less goes to alcohol," Rudd told Parliament. It will "support and encourage families to make positive decisions about the critical things for their families like education, health and nutrition," he added. The United Nations special rapporteur on indigenous human rights, James Anaya, last year described welfare management as "demeaning" and incompatible with Australia's obligations under indigenous and human rights conventions. Irene Khan, secretary-general of the London-based human rights group Amnesty International, mirrored Anaya's criticisms after visiting squalid Outback camps last year, saying such measures targeting Aborigines compromised human rights. Richard Downs, of the Alyawarr Aboriginal tribe in the Northern Territory, said he expected Aborigines would be disproportionately targeted under the loose rules of the new system. "Indigenous people seem to be put in a class of criminals and people who can't manage their lives," Downs said. Amnesty International Australia said in a statement that while the new regime would not be directly racially discriminatory, concerns remain that it would disproportionately effect Aborigines. Aborigines make up about 2 per cent of Australia's 22 million-strong population. But almost 30 per cent of the Northern Territory's population of 200,000 is Aboriginal, the highest proportion in the country. Opposition leader Tony Abbott told Parliament on Wednesday he supported the changes, indicating the legislation may pass in the Senate. |
June 16th, 2010 | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
|
dark relations
Lebs tend to live together in ghettos in Western Sydney, but most of the abos live in rural and regional areas. There are some city dwelling part abos, enjoying government jobs and handouts.
The dark skins tend to group together publicly, but privately don't have much to do with each other. Greeks are even accepted in "Black Boys" aboriginal football teams. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|