Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 1st, 2011 #21
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Why does the US-ZOG government want thousands of young whites to turn to Hitler-worship? The Hegelian Dialectic. ZOG wants to control the opposition by setting up cheesy false flag Hitler-worship organizations in various locations throughout the US and Europe in order to control people and make good photo opportunities so that organizations like the ADL and SPLC will continue to receive tax-payer dollars. How do you know if you belong to such an organization? If they ask you to "pray" to Adolf Hitler that should give a hint.
Don't use Hitler as a crutch. The Indo-European race is your light.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #22
Thomas de Aynesworth
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
It was not meant to be.
You cannot stop the will of the folk. It is likely that German Swiss, had peace continued after 1939, would have yearned for German unification. They would of had it, too.
Quote:
You expect the Swiss to give up their country to Hitler? Why? What's in it for them? Nothing!
The Reich provided all German-speaking peoples with a homeland, and not just a land where Franks and Germans are forced to live in.
Quote:
Besides, the Non-German Swiss are important Europeans too. The Rhaetian people go back to before the Roman Empire. The Helveti where the Celtic tribe that resided in Switzerland during pre-historic times.
It would be highly likely that the western area of Switzerland would be A) left independent or B) ceded to the French.
Quote:
Really, this uncivilized attitude coming from the Hitler-worshipers exposes itself for the baseness that it is.
I don't think it is so uncivilized. Only a folk can create a true civilization, and Switzerland has no folk, rather a collection of folk who do not share common tongue or culture.
Quote:
Hitler was secretly opposed by his highest ranking gernerals (including Rommel and Canaris and later even Himmler) for a reason.
Yes, the Führer refused to allow every general with an idiotic idea try and get a jewel for their own crowns.
Quote:
Hitler simply went nuts! (or he was some kind of imposter to begin with). Which is a good reason in itself to avoid a Hitler style one-man government.
That is not what the contemporary literature or *honest* eye-witnesses tell us.
Quote:
Besides all this, the Axis people (and Europe in general) would have incurred even much heavier losses if Hitler executed his plans for invasion.
Why is that, I wonder? Are you one of those 'Germany couldn't take Switzerland militarily without huge losses' idiots?
Quote:
Many of the ideas of National Socialism did not originate with Hitler. BUT HE HIGHJACKED THEM. Not so dissimilar to the way the "Tea Party" has been highjacked in our time. Which is why we all need watch very closely any leader that rises up out of nowhere and sets up a kind of dictatorship (supposedly representing European interests). This is why I post on VNN. Because Alex Linder does not believe in a "one-man" centralized government. We should all be very scrutinizing of any one-man leader that arises and question him carefully.
No, he did not. The NSDAP gave Hitler full control. It was not a hijacking any more than a rightful heir highjacks his throne.

And stop with this 'question authority' nonsense. Those who question authority to the extent that the subvert it are traitors to their ideology.
Quote:
I forgot to point out that the so called "European Union" is the direct result of Hitler.
The so-called "European Union" is a means by which the remaining plutocrats in Europe can maintain their old order. National-socialism is very much against such degenerate leadership.
Quote:
I remember hearing the arguments of Helmut Kohl. He said the "only alternative to the EU is war"!
Are you having a senility moment? What does Helmut Kohl have to do with anything? He never met the Führer.
Quote:
Cause and effect. "By there fruits shall ye know them". If Germany had better leadership than Hitler then we would not have these problems today. I give Hitler credit for his resistance to Marxism however.
Complete tosh. If Germany had *other* leadership, for better or for worse, the USSR would have occupied at the very least all of mainland Europe, more likely all of Europe.
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #23
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaraT View Post
George, I should have been clearer regarding Switzerland vs. the Germans in WW2.

I think for the short-term the Swiss were in the same boat as the Swedes. As long as they were relatively compliant and supplied the Germans with things they wanted:

Swiss (munitions, chemicals, machinery)

Swedes (nickel and iron ore, timber, troop access from Norway through Sweden to Finland)

they were safe from German aggression for the time being. The Germans would even overlook the Swiss' strong air defense posture because the loss of a few aircraft was acceptable for the benefits they were getting from the ongoing relationship.

Of course, all bets would have been off if Germany had actually won the war and controlled the European continent, say as far out as the Urals. Sweden, Switzerland, Spain and Portugal undoubtedly would have first come under heavy pressure to get in line with the New Order, or else.
Other Neutrals like Sweden and Spain at least had the sea to flee to. The Swiss had no where to go but victory or death against difficult odds.

Dictators like Hitler, Barroso, and Thomas are too easily manipulated by alien powers.

__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #24
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas de Aynesworth View Post
You cannot stop the will of the folk. It is likely that German Swiss, had peace continued after 1939, would have yearned for German unification. They would of had it, too.

The Reich provided all German-speaking peoples with a homeland, and not just a land where Franks and Germans are forced to live in.

It would be highly likely that the western area of Switzerland would be A) left independent or B) ceded to the French.

I don't think it is so uncivilized. Only a folk can create a true civilization, and Switzerland has no folk, rather a collection of folk who do not share common tongue or culture.

Yes, the Führer refused to allow every general with an idiotic idea try and get a jewel for their own crowns.

That is not what the contemporary literature or *honest* eye-witnesses tell us.

Why is that, I wonder? Are you one of those 'Germany couldn't take Switzerland militarily without huge losses' idiots?

No, he did not. The NSDAP gave Hitler full control. It was not a hijacking any more than a rightful heir highjacks his throne.

And stop with this 'question authority' nonsense. Those who question authority to the extent that the subvert it are traitors to their ideology.

The so-called "European Union" is a means by which the remaining plutocrats in Europe can maintain their old order. National-socialism is very much against such degenerate leadership.

Are you having a senility moment? What does Helmut Kohl have to do with anything? He never met the Führer.

Complete tosh. If Germany had *other* leadership, for better or for worse, the USSR would have occupied at the very least all of mainland Europe, more likely all of Europe.
The Swiss speak a much older dialect than Germans stupid.
Why should the Swiss give up their much older more genuine culture for a Halloween party with Nazi costumes?
You make no sense. The Swiss did not yearn for the so called "union" you endorse for a reason.
The Greeks are right. You really are alien bastards. Helmut Kohl is one of the fathers of the so called EU and his actions were the direct result of Hitler.
Anyway, you prove my point.
Go kiss your Lord Hitlers ass.
If there is a just God, then may He grant your wish to serve Hitler, and make Hitler your Lord for eternity.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

Last edited by George De Vaus; November 1st, 2011 at 11:01 PM.
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #25
Thomas de Aynesworth
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,752
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
The Swiss speak a much older dialect than Germans stupid.
German languages vary throughout the country and this vibrant culture was preserved under the steady hand of the NSDAP.
Quote:
Why should the Swiss give up their much older more genuine culture for a Halloween party with Nazi costumes?
They wouldn't be giving up anything, other than an artificial border in exchange for a real one.
Quote:
You make no sense. The Swiss did not yearn for the so called "union" you endorse for a reason.
That's why there was a pile of far-right parties operating in Switzerland, most having connections to Germany. I'm sure these would have fizzled out in Switzerland if Europe stayed out of war.
Quote:
The Greeks are right. You really are alien bastards. Helmut Kohl is one of the fathers of the so called EU and his actions were the direct result of Hitler.
No connection has yet been made. If it was due to Hitler wanting an economic bloc, then I suppose I could just as easily say that Hitler was a direct result of Napoleon, who also was a proponent of a united Europe.
Quote:
If there is a just God, then may He grant your wish to serve Hitler, and make Hitler your Lord for eternity.
You are nuts, old bean.
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #26
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas de Aynesworth View Post
German languages vary throughout the country and this vibrant culture was preserved under the steady hand of the NSDAP.

They wouldn't be giving up anything, other than an artificial border in exchange for a real one.

That's why there was a pile of far-right parties operating in Switzerland, most having connections to Germany. I'm sure these would have fizzled out in Switzerland if Europe stayed out of war.

No connection has yet been made. If it was due to Hitler wanting an economic bloc, then I suppose I could just as easily say that Hitler was a direct result of Napoleon, who also was a proponent of a united Europe.

You are nuts, old bean.
Bullshit. Hitler specifically wanted the Swiss to speak "High German".
A lot of the statements you made are factually false. For example, Albert Speer, in his memoirs describes how he personally witnessed Hitler going mentally insane.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 1st, 2011 #27
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas de Aynesworth View Post
Why not take Switzerland?
I respectfully request the Administrator Alex Linder to comment on this post so that I can make some more informed decisions about how to spend my time.
Thank you.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #28
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
Bullshit. Hitler specifically wanted the Swiss to speak "High German".
A lot of the statements you made are factually false. For example, Albert Speer, in his memoirs describes how he personally witnessed Hitler going mentally insane.
Lol! Goytoy, please! "Speer's memoirs?" You mean that self-serving load of shit he wrote in order to ingratiate himself with his new jew(ish) overlords? You are stupid enough to take that as "factually correct"?!

Here, try this on for size...just for starters (I chose a short one so as not to fuck with your ADD.):

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p439_Weber.html

You're as about as obvious as a boner in sweatpants, and you're not fooling anyone here with your little charade. What's your next unbiased, fair-treatment recommendation going to be?...Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich?
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope.
- Bugs

Last edited by Matthaus Hetzenauer; November 4th, 2011 at 03:05 PM.
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #29
Emmeric
Junior Member
 
Emmeric's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
I forgot to point out that the so called "European Union" is the direct result of Hitler.
Totally ludicrous.

The EU is Hitler's nightmare - a parliamentary behemoth incapable of providing legislation to benefit its peoples.

Period. You go on and on about reading Swiss books to think you know enough about Hitler. Try reading Mein Kampf - and don't read the introduction and decide it isn't worth reading, but then claim to everyone else you read it.
__________________
"Don't pick a fight with an old man, If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." -John Steinbeck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKL7Uc89jFM
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #30
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmeric View Post
Totally ludicrous.

The EU is Hitler's nightmare - a parliamentary behemoth incapable of providing legislation to benefit its peoples.

Period. You go on and on about reading Swiss books to think you know enough about Hitler. Try reading Mein Kampf - and don't read the introduction and decide it isn't worth reading, but then claim to everyone else you read it.
It's not ludicrous. Nigel Farage said the same thing to the EU parliament in one of his speeches (which I discovered only after I made the same observation).

I did read about two-thirds of Mein Kampf and it caused me to conclude that "Hitler" is one of the worst enemies that the European peoples face. "Hitler" is an anti-itellectual. He wants to do the all thinking and decision making.
Yes, he wants strong German bodies but only if they follow his insanity.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #31
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matthias Hetzenauer View Post
Lol! Goytoy, please! "Speer's memoirs?" You mean that self-serving load of shit he wrote in order to ingratiate himself with his new jew(ish) overlords? You are stupid enough to take that as "factually correct"?!

Here, try this on for size...just for starters (I chose a short one so as not to fuck with your ADD.):

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v05/v05p439_Weber.html

You're as about as obvious as a boner in sweatpants, and you're not fooling anyone here with your little charade. What's your next unbiased, fair-treatment recommendation going to be?...Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich?
You dish out a lot of self-refuting innuendo but little substance.
I do not base my conclusion that Hitler went insane on Speers memoirs only but other sources as well. Look, there is a ton of information out there on Hitler's insanity. Learn to do some research. Everyone knows that "Hitler" required his regular dose of dope from Dr. Morrel just to get by.
Why do you people worship a madman? It is beyond me.

Germans attacking their European neighbors is not a "unifying" act.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #32
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas de Aynesworth View Post
You cannot stop the will of the folk. It is likely that German Swiss, had peace continued after 1939, would have yearned for German unification. They would of had it, too.

The Reich provided all German-speaking peoples with a homeland, and not just a land where Franks and Germans are forced to live in.

It would be highly likely that the western area of Switzerland would be A) left independent or B) ceded to the French.

I don't think it is so uncivilized. Only a folk can create a true civilization, and Switzerland has no folk, rather a collection of folk who do not share common tongue or culture.

Yes, the Führer refused to allow every general with an idiotic idea try and get a jewel for their own crowns.

That is not what the contemporary literature or *honest* eye-witnesses tell us.

Why is that, I wonder? Are you one of those 'Germany couldn't take Switzerland militarily without huge losses' idiots?

No, he did not. The NSDAP gave Hitler full control. It was not a hijacking any more than a rightful heir highjacks his throne.

And stop with this 'question authority' nonsense. Those who question authority to the extent that the subvert it are traitors to their ideology.

The so-called "European Union" is a means by which the remaining plutocrats in Europe can maintain their old order. National-socialism is very much against such degenerate leadership.

Are you having a senility moment? What does Helmut Kohl have to do with anything? He never met the Führer.

Complete tosh. If Germany had *other* leadership, for better or for worse, the USSR would have occupied at the very least all of mainland Europe, more likely all of Europe.
England, Iceland, Sweden, ect. are all Germanic nations with Germanic languages. According to your logic the Germans should also invade and occupy these counties as well in the name of "Germanic unification". Sounds crazy, excessively greedy and just plain evil to me. Should the Norman part of Britain go back to France in the name of your grand Nazi unification Tom?
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

Last edited by George De Vaus; November 4th, 2011 at 08:26 PM.
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #33
Chad Wentworth
Senior Member
 
Chad Wentworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Romania
Posts: 1,558
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
You dish out a lot of self-refuting innuendo but little substance.
I do not base my conclusion that Hitler went insane on Speers memoirs only but other sources as well. Look, there is a ton of information out there on Hitler's insanity. Learn to do some research. Everyone knows that "Hitler" required his regular dose of dope from Dr. Morrel just to get by.
Why do you people worship a madman? It is beyond me.

Germans attacking their European neighbors is not a "unifying" act.
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #34
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chad Wentworth View Post
How did you grow those horns Chad? That's amazing.

__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 4th, 2011 #35
Emmeric
Junior Member
 
Emmeric's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Butte, MT
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
It's not ludicrous. Nigel Farage said the same thing to the EU parliament in one of his speeches (which I discovered only after I made the same observation).

I did read about two-thirds of Mein Kampf and it caused me to conclude that "Hitler" is one of the worst enemies that the European peoples face. "Hitler" is an anti-itellectual. He wants to do the all thinking and decision making.
Yes, he wants strong German bodies but only if they follow his insanity.
HORSE SHIT.

You know nothing of Mein Kampf, as evidenced in your response. You use the media portrayal of Hitler, a totally fictional representation of a bogeyman the world has never experienced.
__________________
"Don't pick a fight with an old man, If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." -John Steinbeck

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKL7Uc89jFM
 
Old November 5th, 2011 #36
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
You dish out a lot of self-refuting innuendo but little substance.
I do not base my conclusion that Hitler went insane on Speers memoirs only but other sources as well. Look, there is a ton of information out there on Hitler's insanity. Learn to do some research. Everyone knows that "Hitler" required his regular dose of dope from Dr. Morrel just to get by.
Why do you people worship a madman? It is beyond me.

Germans attacking their European neighbors is not a "unifying" act.
Bullshit, little man. You dished out the innuendo (do you even know the meaning of the word?); I put up irrefutable proof that your boy Speers was a certifiable liar. You listed Speers first and foremost as "proof" that AH was insane -- I submitted real proof that Speers was merely a self-serving bitch trying to get into the good graces of the jew. (Though in a rare instance he did in fact speak the truth when he claimed he was totally unaware that AH planned the mass extermination of European jewry when he, Speers, would've been responsible for coordinating the bulk of the effort. Why such a claim? Because there were no plans for such actions.) Speers would have parroted any script his jew overlords put in front of him, regardless of it being truth or fiction. Was he insane? Check. Was he a virgin? Check. Did he bang his niece? Check. Did he have one testicle? Check. Was he a hermaphrodite? Check. Jesus, Jorge, you really are a complete idiot...

And yes, I'll cede that AH was given amphetamine in one form or another, but this was towards the end of the war when he needed to be awake damn near round-the-clock. He was one man fighting the jew's three: FDR, Churchill and Stalin (or "Uncle Joe" as the jew-owned New York Times so lovingly dubbed him). And speaking of Winnie, he was an outright alcoholic; did he need to stay drunk to stay awake? Everyday, ordinary people are prescribed amphetamines and painkillers, not alcohol -- does this qualify them as insane?

AH isn't a "god" to us; we do not "worship" him -- he's an inspiration. He was the only man to date to actually try to rid his nation and the European continent of jewry's corrosive, malignant influence. Your boys, "The Big Three", fought to ensure jewry's continued domination throughout the West. Without their help judeocommunism wouldn't have triumphed and upwards of 100 million lives would've been spared -- and that's a fact that even a nitwit such as yourself cannot deny.

Now, what else ya got?
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope.
- Bugs

Last edited by Matthaus Hetzenauer; November 5th, 2011 at 12:07 PM.
 
Old November 5th, 2011 #37
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
I respectfully request the Administrator Alex Linder to comment on this post so that I can make some more informed decisions about how to spend my time.
Thank you.
Maybe I can help you out there, Chief...

potty-training? You must be costing your parents a fortune in Pull-ups at this point. I mean thirty fuckin' years...come on already...
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope.
- Bugs
 
Old November 5th, 2011 #38
Matthaus Hetzenauer
Wutta maroon!
 
Matthaus Hetzenauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: In my comfy rabbit hole. Wut's it to ya, doitbag?
Posts: 5,687
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George De Vaus View Post
Why does the US-ZOG government want thousands of young whites to turn to Hitler-worship? The Hegelian Dialectic. ZOG wants to control the opposition by setting up cheesy false flag Hitler-worship organizations in various locations throughout the US and Europe in order to control people and make good photo opportunities so that organizations like the ADL and SPLC will continue to receive tax-payer dollars. How do you know if you belong to such an organization? If they ask you to "pray" to Adolf Hitler that should give a hint.
Don't use Hitler as a crutch. The Indo-European race is your light.
Just where do you come up with this looney-toons bullshit anyway?

Answer this: If jewry did indeed want unsuspecting young Whites to turn to "Hitler-worship", as you put it, why would they have banned Mein Kampf, the "bible of Nazism", from countries such as Germany? And why would they, jewry, work so hard to have it banned in the US? If ZOG was so intent on getting White youths hooked on NS, wouldn't they in fact be promoting the book rather than discouraging the latter from reading it? Well...?

And you ask, "How do you know if you belong to such (a Hitler-worshipping) organization? If they ask you to 'pray' to Adolf Hitler that should give a hint." Pray tell, Jorge, just what organizations are you aware of that ask you to "pray to Adolf Hitler"?

You're a complete fraud, junior, plain and simple. You haven't the faintest as to what you're talking about...
__________________
Wit' jews ya lose; wit' rope deah's hope.
- Bugs

Last edited by Matthaus Hetzenauer; November 5th, 2011 at 12:26 PM.
 
Old November 5th, 2011 #39
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Emmeric View Post
HORSE SHIT.

You know nothing of Mein Kampf, as evidenced in your response. You use the media portrayal of Hitler, a totally fictional representation of a bogeyman the world has never experienced.
If you read it carefully, you might notice (like I did) that Hitler's attitude is more to set himself up as a dictator than it is to help the European race.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
 
Old November 5th, 2011 #40
George De Vaus
Senior Member
 
George De Vaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 963
Default

Matt,
I use the phrase "Hitler-worship" because I saw testimony from Germans (who were children at the time) who said they were asked to pray to Hitler.
Also, Hitler required the entire German military to take an oath of obedience to him personally.
And look at all the irrational attacks that come out of the woodworks as soon as I mention the possibility that Hitler has flaws.
When you call attention to some of Hitler's flaws it is amazing the way people become unglued in exactly the same way that people become unglued when you point out some of the flaws their religions.
__________________
"Speak what you think now in hard words and tomorrow speak what tomorrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said today."
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

Last edited by George De Vaus; November 5th, 2011 at 03:21 PM.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.
Page generated in 0.20880 seconds.