Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 17th, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default The Legal Situation in France

The Gayssot Act (Loi Gayssot), voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it an offense in France to question the existence of the category of crimes against humanity as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46. Proposed by the communist deputy Jean-Claude Gayssot, it is one of several European laws prohibiting Holocaust denial. Its first article states that "any discrimination founded on the membership or non-membership to an ethnic group, a nation, a race or a religion is prohibited." The Commission nationale consultative des droits de l'homme (Human Rights Consultative National Commission), created in 1947, is charged of making a yearly, public report on the situation of racism in France.

After Robert Faurisson was removed from his university chair under the act, he challenged it as a violation of his rights to freedom of expression under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Human Rights Committee upheld the Gayssot Act as necessary to counter possible anti-Semitism.

Text of the law (in French)

Last edited by Alex Linder; February 17th, 2008 at 12:52 PM.
Old February 17th, 2008 #2
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Le Pen found guilty of Holocaust denial

By Henry Samuel in Paris


Disgraced French far-Right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen was given a three-month suspended sentence on Friday for calling the Nazi occupation of France "not particularly inhuman".

The 79-year-old founder of the National Front party, not present for the verdict in a Paris court, was found guilty of denying a crime against humanity and complicity in condoning war crimes, both violations of France's Holocaust denial legislation.

Mr Le Pen was also fined 10,000 euros. His lawyer said he would appeal against the sentence, which was below the five months called for by the prosecution.

The charges relate to comments Mr Le Pen made in an interview with far-Right Rivarol magazine in 2005.

The court said Mr Le Pen had sought to "instill doubt" about Nazi persecution of Resistance members and Jews and their deportation.

It also ruled that he had "re-written history" to present the Gestapo in a favourable light, while making no mention of its crimes when referring to a 1944 massacre in the town of Villeneuve d'Ascq.

"The court reproaches my client for not talking about certain episodes. That is impossible to defend," Mr Le Pen's lawyer, Walleyrand de Saint Juste, told The Daily Telegraph.

The veteran leader has been convicted of several other controversial outbursts, but anti-racism organisation MRAP praised the "very heavy" sentence, saying it was very rare to convict someone via the press.

A journalist at Rivarol and the newspaper's head received fines. All three were ordered to pay a symbolic euro to the Sons and Daughters of French Jews association.

The verdict comes as the National Front, which Mr Le Pen will lead for another three years, is facing political and final meltdown.
Old February 17th, 2008 #3
M. Delataire
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 722
M. Delataire

It would not surprise me if a ZOG educater suggested that the Kwa impose such a program as well. However, if imposed, can it be turned against them?
Old February 17th, 2008 #5
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

56 lawyers have launched November 21, a call for the repeal of the "memorial laws" - whose law antirévisionniste Fabius-Gayssot - here is the list of courageous signatories.

Bertrand MATHIEU, Professeur, Université Paris I
François TERRE, Membre de l’Institut François EARTH, Member of the Institute
Anne Marie LE POURHIET, Professeur Université Rennes 1
Olivier GOHIN, Professeur, Université Paris II
Thierry DI MANNO, Professeur, Université de Toulon
François GAUDU, Professeur, Université Paris I
Anne LEVADE, Professeur Université Paris XII
Christophe BOUTIN, Professeur Université de Caen
Yves JEGOUZO, Professeur Université Paris I
Florence CHALTIEL, Professeur, IEP Grenoble Florence
Olivier DUBOS, Professeur, Université Bordeaux IV
Marie Claire PONTHOREAU, Professeur Université Bordeaux IV
Maryse DEGUERGUE, Professeur, Université Paris I
Frédéric SUDRE, Professeur, Université de Montpellier
Paul CASSIA, Professeur, Université Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines
Diane de BELLESCIZE, Professeur, Université du Havre
Henri OBERDORFF, Professeur, IEP de Grenoble
Olivier LECUCQ, Professeur, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour
Jean MORANGE, Professeur, Université Paris II
Gilles LEBRETON, Professeur, Université du Havre
Yvonne FLOUR, Professeur, Université Paris I
Jean-Jacques DAIGRE, Professeur, Université Paris I
Catherine LABRUSSE RIOU, Professeur, Université Paris I
Yves DAUDET, Professeur, Université Paris I
Olivier JOUANJAN, professeur, Universités de Strasbourg
Alain PIETRANCOSTA, Professeur, Université Paris I
Jean GAYON, Professeur, Université Paris I
Michel MENJUCQ, Professeur, Université Paris I
Raymonde VATINET, Professeur, Université Paris V
Danielle CORRIGNAN-CARSIN, Professeur, Université Rennes 1
Alexis CONSTANTIN, Professeur, université Rennes 1
Pierre AVRIL, Professeur émérite, Université Paris II
Bernard CHANTEBOUT, Professeur émérite, Université Paris V
Guillaume WICKER, Professeur, Université Bordeaux IV
Michel GERMAIN, Professeur, Université Paris II
Joseph PINI, Professeur, Université Aix-Marseille III
Geneviève BASTID BURDEAU, Professeur Université Paris I
Hervé LECUYER, Professeur, Université Paris II
Florence DEBOISSY, Professeur, Université Bordeaux IV
Marie France CHRISTOPHE TCHAKALOFF, Professeur, Université Paris I
Jacques PETIT, Professeur, Université Rennes 1
Christian LARROUMET, Professeur Université Paris II
Christophe de LA MARDIERE, Professeur, Université de Dijon
Laurent AYNES, Professeur, Université Paris I
Olivier BARRET, Professeur, Université Paris V
Michel FROMONT, Professeur émérite, Université Paris I
Yves GAUDEMET, Professeur, Université Paris II
Vincent HEUZÉ, Professeur, Université Paris I
Philippe STOFFEL-MUNCK, Professeur, Université Paris I
Pierre MAYER, Professeur, Université Paris I
Philippe PORTIER, Professeur, Université Rennes I
Frédéric POLLAUD-DULIAN, Professeur, Université Paris I
André ROUX, Professeur, Université Aix Marseille III
Stéphane PIERRE CAPS, Professeur, Université de Nancy
Francis HAMON, Professeur émérite, Université Paris XI
Alexandre VIALA, Professeur, Université Montpellier
Old February 17th, 2008 #6
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

The French Government's hypocrisy, Islam and Holocaust revisionism (2)
Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:44:29

A Second Open Letter to France's Ambassador to the US by Paul Grubach

Faurisson was severely injured in a nearly fatal attack on Sept. 16, 1989.

This is a Second Open Letter to France's Ambassador to the United States by Paul Grubach February 8, 2008

Ambassador Pierre Vimont Embassy of France in the United States 4101 Reservoir Road, NW Washington, D. C. 20007

Dear Ambassador Vimont

As you are undoubtedly aware by now, Holocaust revisionist scholar Dr. Robert Faurisson will probably stand trial for comments he made at the Iran Holocaust Conference of December 2006. Allegedly, he violated France's Gayssot Act, a statute passed in 1990 that prohibits any public doubt about the alleged Jewish Holocaust.

There is a new development to this ongoing story that I would like to bring to your attention.

On January 24, Dr. Faurisson was taken into police custody for questioning and a search of his house was carried out. In my last open letter to you of January 15, I brought attention to the hypocritical double standard of the French government.

In September 2006, high school teacher Robert Redeker made a scathing attack upon the Prophet Mohammed and the Islamic religion in the center-right daily Le Figaro. Because of threats to his life, he was forced to go into hiding.

The French government immediately came to his defense, offering him police protection and a public statement on his behalf. In reference to Redeker's case, former Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin called the threats to his life "unacceptable," and added: "We are in a democracy. Everyone has the right to express his views freely, while respecting others, of course." (See The New York Times, 30 September 2006, p. A 3)

That this is an outrageous lie is demonstrated by the ongoing plight of Dr. Faurisson. In 1991, French "democracy" demanded that Dr. Faurisson be removed from his university chair. In July 2006, French "democracy" again violated his inalienable right to freedom of speech and research. He was convicted of "Holocaust denial" by a Paris court over remarks he made on Iranian television, and was given a three-month suspended prison term and he has to pay 18 000 euros.

Clearly, as the cases of Redeker and Faurisson show, one has the right to attack and violate the sacred beliefs of Muslims, but one has no right whatsoever to question and repudiate the Holocaust doctrine, one of the most sacred beliefs of Jewish-Zionism. The sacred belief and taboo of the Jewish people is enshrined in law in France. If you contest the Holocaust, you are prosecuted and persecuted.

However, the sacred beliefs of Muslims are not enshrined in law. If you attack Muslim beliefs, this is depicted as an expression of "freedom of speech." Once again, this is evidence of a hypocritical double standard. I have come across another case which further bolsters my point.

Do you recognize the name of the French Jewish writer, Marek Halter? He co-founded the so-called "anti-racist" group, SOS-Racisme. There is an interview of him in the February 11, 2005 issue of the English edition of The International Jerusalem Post, (pp. 9-11).

Halter claims that France's rapidly growing Islamic population is too frequently incompatible with democracy. Let me give you two of his direct quotes. Halter stated: "All of a sudden we realize that they [Muslims] are not a small minority anymore and that the way most of them practice their religion is not compatible with French democratic principles." He also stated: "Muslims threaten to weaken a French democracy that no longer knows how to impose its rules without seeming oppressive."

In April 2007 the European Union made inciting racism and xenophobia crimes throughout its 27 member states in a landmark decision. Even before April 2007, when Halter made these statements, inciting racism and xenophobia in France were outlawed.

That is to say, Halter made these statements when these "racism and xenophobia" laws were on the books. A French prosecutor could cogently argue that Halter's statements incite hatred and xenophobia against Muslims, and thus, the man should be prosecuted. After all, he is stating that Muslims as a group threaten to weaken and even destroy French "democracy."

This will cause people to hate Muslims. Your so-called French "democracy" allows him to make anti-Muslim statements. Yet, Robert Faurisson is put on trial by this same French "democracy" for making statements that contest and debunk Holocaust orthodoxy.

Do you see my point, Ambassador Vimont? France grants "freedom of speech" to Jewish people like Marek Halter who criticize and attack Muslims. Yet, "democratic" France denies freedom of speech to non-Jews like Faurisson who question and debunk the orthodox view of the Holocaust.

If France was truly a democracy as former Prime Minister de Villepin claims, it would defend Dr. Faurisson's right to freedom of research on the Holocaust. That is to say, there would be no "limits in advance" or "prewritten conclusions" about his Holocaust research.

After all, France grants freedom of research for atheists and others who deny the existence of God or attack the Islamic and Christian religions.

If the French government does prosecute and imprison Dr. Faurisson for his Holocaust revisionist views, this will only demonstrate to the world the truth of his arguments. The French government cannot disprove his Holocaust revisionism with reason and science, but must resort to oppressive laws and prison sentences in its attempt to silence truth.

Sincerely, Paul Grubach
Old February 17th, 2008 #7
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

PERIGUEUX, France - President Nicolas Sarkozy on Friday defended a plan to require 10-year-olds to honor child victims of the Holocaust, saying adults should not hide terrible truths from children.

The idea, floated by the president earlier this week, rankled psychologists worried about traumatizing youth and has teachers reviving debates about how France remembers World War II. But Sarkozy stood firmly by the plan in meetings with teachers over proposed reforms of France's school system.

"We must tell a child the truth," he said. "We do not traumatize children by giving them the gift of the memory of the country."

The president wants each child in the last year of French primary school, at about 10 years old, to "adopt" the memory of one of the 11,000 Jewish children in France killed in the Holocaust, learning about the selected child's background and fate.

"If you do not talk to them of this tragedy, then you should not be surprised if it repeats itself," Sarkozy said. "It is ignorance that prompts the repetition of abominable situations, not knowledge. Make our children into children with open eyes."

Sarkozy outlined no details of the plan, which does not have to be submitted to a vote in parliament. Education Minister Xavier Darcos said the practice may not be obligatory, but the goal is to have children start adopting Holocaust victims in the next school year.

Respected former Health Minister Simone Veil, herself a survivor of the Auschwitz concentration camp, said she found the plan chilling.

"It's unimaginable, unbearable, tragic, and above all, unfair," Veil was quoted as saying on the Web site of the magazine L'Express. "We can't inflict this on 10-year-old children. We can't ask a child to identify with a dead child. The weight of this memory is much too heavy to bear."

Supporters of the plan include renowned Nazi hunter Serge Klarsfeld. Much of the existing information about France's Holocaust victims came out of research led by Klarsfeld.

Psychiatrist Serge Hefez was among those who voiced reservations about Sarkozy's idea, saying on LCI television that adults should not "impose ghosts" on children.

Teachers unions complained that they were not consulted ahead of time.
Old February 17th, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Zionists Attack Truth-Seeking Scholars

Jews will once again subject Robert Faurisson (aged 78) to a trial for “holocaust denial.” The French judicial police served Faurisson a summons demanding that he appear in court this Thursday (24 Jan 08). Faurisson is charged with attending the December 11, 2006 conference in Iran titled, “Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision.”

This will be the fifteenth time that Jews have hauled Faurisson into court. Jews have already frozen his bank account, while court officials have repeatedly visited his home, threatening him and his wife with seizure of their furniture to pay for financial "damages" caused by his “heretical” remarks.

Faurisson is arguably the most thorough of all examiners of the holo-hoax. Ernst Zündel, Gemar Rudolph and others are in prison, but Jews consider Faurisson enemy #1, because of the meticulousness of his work. And since the holo-hoax cannot be defended with reason and science, Jews use oppressive laws and prison sentences to protect it from rational criticism. In many cases they use extreme violence, as you will see later in this post. Fortunately the Goyim are too cowardly to resist Jewish terrorism.

At the Iran conference, Faurisson said that for the past 32 years, he has been waiting for someone to show him one of the chambers where Jews where supposedly gassed during the holo-hoax.

In July 2006, a Paris court convicted Faurisson of “holocaust denial” because of remarks made by Faurisson on the Sahar 1 Iranian satellite channel in February 2005. Faurisson was given a three-month suspended prison term, and was also fined 7,500 euros.

The former Prime Minister of France, Dominique de Villepin, said, "We [the French people] are in a democracy. Everyone has the right to express his views freely.”

Therefore all defamatory remarks against Muslims or Islam are protected as “free speech.”

However, any questioning of the holo-hoax or Jewish atrocities is illegal.

The Gayssot Act of 1990 – initiated by President Jaques Chirac -- prohibits any questioning or examination of the holo-hoax.

Faurisson’s specialty is examining documents and manuscripts. In 1991 he was fired from his university post for questioning the holo-hoax. He was charged with violating the Gayssot Act, (Loi Gayssot) passed on 13 July 1990 that makes it illegal in France to question the holo-hoax. The law was proposed by the communist deputy Jean-Claude Gayssot, and is one of several European laws that make it illegal to examine the holo-hoax.

Its first article states that "any discrimination founded on the membership or non-membership to an ethnic group, a nation, a race or a religion is prohibited."

Discrimination against Muslims, of course, is permissible.

When Faurisson was terminated at the university, he appealed to the ICCPRHRC (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Human Rights Committee). This is a UN group that polices literature for any questioning of the holo-hoax. (It is not to be confused with the more high-profile Commission on Human Rights, a Charter-based mechanism, or its replacement, the Human Rights Council, which of course is controlled by Jews.)

Faurisson said the Gayssot Act violated international law. The ICCPRHRC disagreed, saying the Gayssot Act is necessary to counter “possible anti-Semitism.”

In 1991 Faurisson (collaborating with Siegfried Verbeke” published the Dutch-language brochure Het "Dagboek" van Anne Frank. Een kritische benadering ( The “Diary” of Anne Frank - A Critical Evaluation). The examination concluded that the “diary” is a forgery, since the original handwritten manuscript cannot be that of a child. The brochure was outlawed in the Netherlands.

Faurisson was born on January 25, 1929, in Shepperton, England. His father was French and his mother was Scottish. In his youth he attended schools in Singapore, Japan, and France. He was educated at a Lycée in Paris, and at the renowned Sorbonne. He received his "State Doctorate" in letters and the humanities from the Sorbonne in 1972, where he also taught from 1969 to 1974. From 1974 until 1990, he was a professor of French literature at the University of Lyon II. He is a recognized specialist of text and document analysis, and is the author of four books on French literature.

Faurisson took the stand as a witness to defend Ernst Zündel in the 1985 and 1988 Jewish trials in Toronto. He brought in Fred Leuchter, an American gas chamber specialist who had personally examined Nazi detention camps. Faurisson also spent hundreds of hours -- often working all day and very late into the night -- preparing questions used by defense attorney Doug Christie to demolish prosecutors.

(Side note: On 7 May 1995, Jews attacked Ernst Zündel’s home in Toronto. A few days later, Jews sent Zündel a booby-trapped package, which Zündel turned over to the police, who exploded it).

During an interview in December 1980 with the French radio network "Europe 1," Faurisson summarized the result of his historical research:

“The alleged gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which has made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are Israel and international zionism. The principal victims are the German people -- but not their leaders -- and the entire Palestinian people.”

For these words, Faurisson was convicted in July 1981 of “racial defamation and incitement to racial hatred” (even though Jews are not a race). He was given a suspended three month prison sentence, fined several thousand francs, and ordered to pay 3.6 million francs for the cost of making public the verdict on television and in periodicals. However, in June 1982 an appeals court threw out the charge of incitement to racial hatred and eliminated the 3.6 million franc payment.

In June 1995 a Paris court ordered Faurisson to pay a fine of $3,000 for writing Réponse à Jean-Claude Pressac sur le problème des chambres à gaz ("Response to Jean-Claude Pressac on the problem of the gas chambers"). Henri Roques, another French revisionist, was likewise fined $3,000 by the court for distributing the work.

On 25 September 1997, the Jews charged Faurisson for a statement made in April 1996 about the Garaudy-Abbé Pierre affair in which he mentioned "the imposture of the Nazi gas chambers." During the trial, Faurisson told the court: "We are only three years away from the year 2000, and there are billions of people who are asked to believe in something they have never seen and don't even know how it worked!"

The prosecutor asked for a new kind of sentence: either imprisonment or a fine, to which Faurisson responded by declaring: "I shall not buy and shall not pay for my freedom. No one has ever bought me and no one will ever buy me."

On 23 October 1997 the court found him “guilty” and ordered him to pay 120,600 francs ($20,000), divided into three parts: 50,000 francs as a fine, 20,600 francs for the Jewish prosecutor, and 50,000 to pay for the publication of the summary of the court's judgment in two daily newspapers.

Three months later the Jews charged him again. In December 1997 Faurisson received a summons from a Paris court official for an essay, "The Horned Visions of the Holocaust," that had been posted on a website without his prior knowledge or approval. In this piece Faurisson wrote, "The Holocaust of the Jews is a fiction."

He responded to the summons with a stern letter in which he declared his refusal to "collaborate" with French justice authorities and police in the repression of revisionism.

Three months after that, the Jews attacked again. On March 16, 1998, Faurisson had to appear before a Paris court to stand trial for a short definition of "revisionism," as inaccurately reported in a newspaper.

The following month, Dutch Jews launched an attack. On April 8, 1998 Faurisson was ordered to stand trial in Amsterdam for the publication in 1991 in Dutch of his detailed analysis of the Anne Frank Diary. The Anne Frank Museum in Amsterdam and the Anne Frank Fonds in Basel, Switzerland, jointly brought the legal action. The Museum complained that Faurisson’s work made it necessary to provide “special training” for museum guides who had been awakened, and that Faurisson’s critique might reduce the number of museum visitors, and therefore museum revenues.

On October 3, 2006, a Paris court found Faurisson guilty of “Holocaust denial” for having said, during an interview with Iranian television, that “there was never” a single execution gas chamber used by the Germans during World War II.

As you can see, the Jews really want to silence this guy.

Jewish terrorists physically attacked Faurisson ten times between November 1978 and May 1993. None of the Jewish terrorists was ever brought to justice. The attack on September 16, 1989 (photo above) almost killed him. A Jewish terrorist group that called itself "The Sons of the Memory of the Jews" claimed responsibility. None were charged with a crime.

Three young Jews set a trap for the 60-year-old scholar, waiting until he was out walking his dog. They hit him with pepper spray, knocked him to the ground, and then repeatedly kicked him in the face and chest. Faurissaon only managed to get to the hospital because a passerby saw him lying on the ground. Badly injured, he had to undergo a lengthy surgical operation.
Old February 17th, 2008 #9
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder


As you will see below, Jews are the only people who can get away with violence in France. The media ignored most of the following Jewish terrorist acts, one of which was seen by millions. Jewish publications or organizations applauded them, and suggested that the Goy victims deserved their fate, and that such attacks are "only natural and normal," and that no one need expect any leniency in the future if he should ever again arouse Jewish anger.

As you read the following, keep in mind that there have been several hundred victims of Jewish terror groups, but not a single Jew has even been the victim of an organized attack in France.

In France there is a consensus that Jewish terrorists must be treated as a privileged minority whose "anger" (colère) must be excused, even when they attack and hospitalize police officers, as they often have. Hence Jews have a Yiddish proverb: "Happy as God in France" (“God” meaning Jews).

Private militia groups are not legal in France – unless they identify themselves as Jews. Jewish terrorists are the only ones legally permitted to bear arms in France. (Do you think I’m exaggerating? Keep reading.) France's criminal police investigators are paralyzed in their investigations of crimes committed by Jewish terrorists, who are euphemistically called "young Jewish activists of Paris." The organized Jewish community possesses -- with Interior Ministry approval -- a paramilitary force the like of which does not exist for any other ethnic, religious or minority group in France.


• On 18 March 1978, Jews planted a car bomb that killed François Duprat, an author and distributor of holo-hoax revisionist writings. Duprat’s wife was severely injured. The “Sons of the Memory of the Jews" claimed responsibility (the same group that attacked Faurisson in 1989).

• On 9 December 1979, a hundred Jews wearing helmets attacked the 14th national conference of GRECE (Groupe d'études et de recherches sur la civilisation européenne, "Group for the Study and Research of European Civilization"). Wrecking the bookstands, they displayed banners bearing the name "Organisation juive de défense" (OJD, "Jewish Defense Organization"). Fifteen of the conference attendees were injured. One lost an eye. The police arrested several of the terrorists, but released them that same afternoon on the intervention of Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch, a Jewish friend of Jacques Chirac (future President of France). Keep that name Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch in mind as you continue reading. He will pop up again and again when Jews commit terrorist acts.

• On 19 September 1980, terrorist members of the "Jewish Defense Organization" (OJD) attacked sympathizers of Marc Fredriksen, an executive of FANE ("Fédération d'action nationale et européenne," or "National and European Action Federation"), at the Paris Palace of Justice (court house). The Jews injured six persons, two of them seriously. The Palace of Justice guards, although charged with maintaining order, permitted the Jewish terrorists to strike without hindrance.

(The OJD is the European equivalent to the terrorist Jewish Defense League.)

• On 3 October 1980, Jews attacked and wrecked the headquarters of FANE (National and European Action Federation"). The same night, Jews attacked the Librairie française bookstore on the rue de l'Abbé-Grégoire street in Paris. Jews tried to burn down this bookstore more than ten times. Jews also fired machine guns at the headquarters of a small political party, l'Oeuvre française, directed by Pierre Sidos. Also in October, groups of Jewish demonstrators roamed the streets, attacking anyone who was tall, blond, and had short hair.

• On 7 October 1980, Jews threw sulfuric acid on Charles Bousquet, 84 years old, in his home in Neuilly. The Jewish terrorists had apparently mistaken him for the nationalist Pierre Bousquet (no relation to René Bousquet). Charles Bousquet was hospitalized for a month at Foch Hospital in the major burns ward, and suffered after-effects from his injuries. He refused to press charges because his son Pierre, a professor of history at the University of Paris IV, has asked him not to "on account of the Israelites." He told Robert Faurisson, "They Jews who did it will be in Israel by now, so it would all be useless. I want to forget it.”

• On 12 October 1980, Jews attacked Mark Fredriksen, beating him severely. Fredriksen was admitted to the Rambouillet hospital in serious condition. While he was in the hospital being treated for multiple fractures, Jews tore up his apartment. Later while he was still in the hospital, three young Jews showed up and asked to see him. Their description matched that of the Aziza team that subsequently attacked Michel Caignat with acid…

• On the morning of 29 January 1981, Jews attacked Michel (Miguel) Caignet, a 26-year-old Sorbonne student who was preparing for a doctorate in Anglo-German linguistics. Caignet, a holo-hoax revisionist, had just left his residence in Courbevoie to go to the university when four Jews knocked him down, held him down, and sprayed sulfuric acid into his face and right hand. Following the attack with acid, his face looked so hideous that only two newspapers ventured to publish his photograph.

Within an hour the police grabbed the principal terrorist, Yves Aziza, but released him so he could go to Israel.

• On 20 October 1980, Jews attacked the revisionist writer André Figuéras at his residence.

• On 18 September 1981, about 200 Jews of the Organisation juive de combat (OJC or "Jewish Combat Organization") beat up several spectators at the Palace of Justice in Paris, where the defamation trial brought by Pierre Sidos, president of l'Oeuvre française, against Jean-Pierre Bloch was taking place. (Bloch was a Jewish defender of Jewish terrorists.)

• On 25 November 1981, Jews torched the Études et documentation bookstore.

• On 8 May 8 1988, at Saint-Augustin Square in Paris, Jewish terrorists used iron bars to attack l'Oeuvre française supporters who were taking part in the traditional parade in honor of Joan of Arc. The Jews wounded 15 supporters, two of them very seriously. Four of the victims were hospitalized. A 70-year-old man remained comatose for several weeks. The police question ten Jewish terrorists from the en OJC (“Organisation juive de combat or "Jewish Combat Organization"), but Jewish lawyer Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch interceded on their behalf. Legal proceedings were instituted against some of the attackers. Only three of the Jewish terrorists were tried. Each received a two-year suspended prison sentence.

• On 6 February 1990, during a television broadcast emceed by Christophe Dechavanne, Jewish lawyer Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch came on to the stage with a group of OJC terrorists. Olivier Mathieu Mathieu had just time enough to exclaim: "Faurisson is right." Then ten or so of the terrorists severely beat him, his fiancée, and Marc Botrel. Millions of TV viewers saw this. The terrorists included Moshe Cohen, a former second lieutenant of the Israeli army. The Jewish attacks continued off stage and out into the street. The police questioned one of the Jewish terrorists, but quickly released him on the intercession of Jean-Pierre Pierre-Bloch, the Jewish lawyer who had helped commit the terrorist acts himself.

Jews have repeatedly attacked Pierre Guillaume, who was in charge of the Vieille Taupe ("Old Mole") publishers, which has issued a number of revisionist works, including those of Professor Faurisson. Guillaume has been physically attacked, and his Paris bookstore has been firebombed. Jews also attacked him at the Palace of Justice in Paris (where the guards did not intervene). In 1991, Jews attacked his bookstore in the rue d'Ulm on a regular basis.

• On 20 April 1991, at the "Maison des Mines" building in Paris, 50 Jews claiming to be members of the Groupe d'action juive ("Jewish Action Group") used iron bars and baseball bats to attack elderly attendees of a meeting of the "Friends of Saint-Loup" ("Les Amis de Saint-Loup"), named after a deceased writer whose real name was Marc Augier. Thirteen persons were injured, two of them very seriously. Juliette Cavalié, 67 years of age, was taken to Beaujon Hospital, where she lapsed into a coma that lasted three months. She was never able walk or feed herself again.

• On 12 September 1987 at the Sorbonne University, Jews attacked Henry Chauveau, plus Michel Sergent, Pierre Guillaume, Freddy Storer (a Belgian), and Professor Faurisson, all of whom were injured. (Chauveau was seriously injured.) The Sorbonne guards grabbed one of the Jewish terrorists, but a plainclothes policeman ordered the Jew released. The incident was used to expel Robert Faurisson from the Sorbonne University on the grounds that he “attracted violence.’ (Prof. Faurisson had once taught at the Sorbonne.)

One of the documents that Jews use as “evidence” for the “gassings” hoax is the “Confessions' of Kurt Gerstein,” which itself is a hoax. In June 1985, Henri Roques wrote a thesis that demolished the Kurt Gerstein hoax. Jean-Claude Allard, a holo-hoax revisionist, presided over the thesis examining board. In an action without precedent in French academic history, Jews annulled the thesis' defense. Then on 14 January 1988 in Lyon, Jews attacked and hospitalized Professor Jean-Claude Allard. The OJC ("Jewish Combat Organization") claimed responsibility.

• In 1993 there was civil unrest in a Paris soccer match. Several French citizens (some of them Jews) were tried, and became known as the "hooligans of the Parc des Princes," a Paris soccer stadium. On 13 April 1994, during a break in the trial, Jewish terrorists entered the Palace of Justice with weapons and iron bars, and attacked the courthouse guards. None of the terrorists were arrested.

Jews attack Goyim throughout France, but especially in the Palace of Justice (central courthouse) district in Paris, plus the surrounding area. This area is under particularly good police surveillance for two reasons. First, the Palace has its own "military command" consisting of hundreds of armed guards. Second, next to the Palace building is the "Quai des Orfèvres," or the headquarters of the police crime investigations department. Fortunately for Jewish terrorists, the police never stop them, for fear of becoming victims themselves. Once the militants have complete their brutal work and have disappear, the cowardly guards hasten to the bloody victims, fussing over them like concerned nannies. The victims are never able to get the police to interrogate the attackers, or even to learn their identities.

Collusion of the Interior Ministry with Jewish Terrorists

In 1986, when Laurent Fabius was Prime Minister of France, his wife, Mme. Françoise Castro, revealed that the Jewish terrorists and the Interior Minister worked hand in hand. She stated: "The government has allowed Jewish militants to establish themselves in some quarters of Paris and also in Toulouse, Marseille, and Strasbourg [and to have] regular contacts with the Interior Minister."

On 8 June 1993, Jews attacked René Bousquet, former secretary general of the police in the wartime Vichy government (and who was later deported by the Germans).

French Jews are allowed to publicly call for murder

On December 14, 1992, in report broadcast nationwide on the American PBS radio network, Professor Pierre Vidal-Naquet said in English: "I hate Faurisson. If I could, I'd kill him personally."

Calls for physical violence have appeared many times in French papers. Example: "As far as he is concerned, Jacques Kupfer, president of [the militantly Zionist] Herout de France, has a precise idea of the Jewish response. Kupfer said, “I have never been of the opinion that anti-Semitism is settled by means of communiqués or philosophical discussions. You settle the problem of the anti-Semites in a very physical manner. Jewish young people must be ready for that: there's no need to cry, or to be afraid, or to complain.”

A list of incendiary statements by French Jews in positions of responsibility calling for physical violence would be a long one. Jews do not shrink from political assassination. On this subject, one may read the recent work of Nachman Ben-Yehuda, Political Assassination by Jews: A Rhetorical Device for Justice (New York: State Univ. of New York Press, 1993).

We know the considerable role played by Jews in the Bolshevik revolution. In France, the song of the Bolshevik partisans was written by two Jews, Joseph Kessel (1898-1979) and Maurice Druon, both of which were later members of the French Academy. The song's refrain is well known: "Hey there! Killers by gun or blade. Kill swiftly!" ("Ohé! Les tueurs à la balle et au couteau. Tuez vite!")

The Klarsfelds

For more than three decades, Jewish militant Serge Klarsfeld and his German-born wife, Beate, have dedicated themselves to fighting and holocaust revisionism. Serge Klarsfeld is an attorney and an officer of the National Order of Merit, but he has never concealed his taste for violent action against Goyim he does not like. He has also admitted to using lies and blackmail.

On 24 July 1978 at a news conference in Paris following the indictment in Cologne of Kurt Lischka, Serge Klarsfeld stated: "We are not seeking vengeance. If that were our aim, it would have been easy for us to kill all the Nazi criminals we have tracked down." Someone asked, “What f the court in Cologne refuses to try Lischka?" Klarsfeld replied: "That would be signing his death sentence"

In 1982 the Klarsfelds hired an assassin, a Bolivian socialist of Indian origin named Juan Carlos, to liquidate Klaus Barbie, but the operation did not succeed.

During a 1986 interview with the Chicago Tribune (June 29, 1986), Beate Klarsfeld told "how she haunted at least three former Nazis until they committed suicide or died; how she organized attempts to kidnap others; how she used headline-making gimmicks to bring to trial or to ruin the careers of many who were convinced the world had forgotten them." She related how she slapped the face of German Chancellor Kurt-Georg Kiesinger in public in 1968.

In 1991, Beate Klarsfeld entered Syria with fraudulent papers to go after Alois Brunner (who was already disfigured and missing most of his fingers as the result of letter bombs). She wanted to repeat the kind of demonstration that had been staged in front of the home of Paul Touvier in 1972 (which was broken into, looted, and laid waste).

In 1992, the Klarsfelds organized what Le Monde (Oct. 21, 1992, p. 4) called "the savage escapade of the Betar at Rostock (France). They spread terror in the central square of the Rostock town hall, with Israeli flags displayed, calling passersby “dirty Germans, dirty Nazis!” A short time later Beate Klarsfeld expressed approval of the Betar attack against the Goethe Institute (German cultural center) in Paris, calling it an act of "legitimate violence," because the Rostock police had questioned a few of the Jewish attackers. Jewish terrorists had injured nine policemen, several of which required hospitalization after being beaten with baseball bats and iron bars, and sprayed with toxic gas.

Other Jewish efforts to destroy holo-hoax revisionists

By law Robert Faurisson (at the University of Lyon II) and Bernard Notin (at the University of Lyon III) were allowed to resume lecturing after their court sentences had expired. Jewish terrorists disagreed. One of them, Marc Aron, plus organizations as the Union of Jewish Students of France, declared that Faurisson and Notin must never again be allowed to publish or lecture. Without so much as a murmur, all the presidents of the Republic in succession, all the prime ministers, all the Education Ministers, all the university presidents, and all the labor unions promptly submitted to that edict. Faurisson and Notin were banned for life.

In June 1994 Bernard Notin tried to move to Morocco so he could teach at the University of Oujda. The Union of Jewish Students of France demanded the cancellation of the contract signed by the Moroccan university, and “the definitive dismissal of M. Notin from the teaching profession altogether.” Naturally the contract was torn up.
Old February 17th, 2008 #10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 1,629

Newbies: note that the Fabius-Gayssot Act is named after a Jew, Laurent Fabius. The Jewish roots of that law are mentioned here:

Old March 22nd, 2008 #11
Robert Bandanza
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: JUDEAware, originally MassaJEWsetts
Posts: 8,901
jewsign Zionist Thought-Crime Police go after French Alternative News Site
Old March 24th, 2008 #12
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

"Israel is only state where snipers shoot down little girls outside their school gates".

A French senior civil servant has been sacked for publishing a violent anti-Israeli diatribe on a website, the Interior Ministry said.

The atricle was published on March 13 on the website, which serves the Muslim community in France. Bruno Guigue, deputy prefect of the southwestern town of Saintes, wrote that Israel was "the only state where snipers shoot down little girls outside their school gates."

The author of several books on the Israli-Palestinian conflict, Guigue wrote of the "Israeli jails where – thanks to religious law – they stop torturing on the Sabbath."

The article sparked a row in the country and was harshly condemned by politicians from all sides of the political arena.

Interior Minister Michele Alliot-Marie dismissed the official after learning of the column on Wednesday, the ministry said., which is said to have 6 million unique users per month, presents itself as "the first website for French-speaking Muslims worldwide."

According to its owners, it helps to distribute cultural and civil information and advance the dialogue on integration and the representation of Muslims in Europe and in the French-speaking world.
Old March 24th, 2008 #13
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

[jews attempt to censor a website in France]

AlterInfo in trouble: another struggle for the freedom of speech on the Internet

The French alternative website is threatened with closing down as they face legal complaints and accusations of "antisemitism" by the Zionist lobby.

The French associative AlterInfo news agency is facing what it qualifies as a "new attempt of intimidation and destabilization". In January, UEJF [1] and AIPJ [2], two Jewish militant associations, lodged and summoned AlterInfo to appear in court for a summary judgment. The judgment returned on January 18th ruled in the Jewish lobbies' favour, which prompted the news agency to lodge an appeal, in which they will be able to better explain and justify their position. [Note: AlterInfo cannot reveal too many details about the case, to prevent the justice from interpreting the news release as an interference in the judicial procedure.]

These legal proceedings, as reported on the alternative news site, follow repeated death threats as well as several attempts at bribery in order to influence the editors and their editorial line. The editorial line is defined as "the transmission of another version of what the dominant thought imposes, an alternative interpretation of the information conveyed by the commercial media".

This procedure is coupled with a media campaign, in the front line of which we find UEJF and AIPJ.

Alterinfo's editor reports in an article:

" [...] I will mention two articles which the militant UEJF and AIPJ associations published against me and against the Alter Info website in their community press. 'L'Actualité Juive' ('The Jewish News') and its very 'objective' scribe are not attempting this for the first time: over the last year, at least three insulting articles have been published by the same right-thinking author. See :

Jean-Yves Camus' last article in 'Actualité Juive' in pdf format

The CRIF[3], recently joined this assault by publishing a statement entitled: "Writ issued against an anti-Semitic and conspiracy focused website."

Alterinfo states:

"Those who, since our beginnings, have been denigrating us, have suddenly been more fearless after the complaint filed against us - which is easily seen by googling (always visible on some sites against which we do not exclude the possibility of raising a complaint). After the CRIF website which published: 'Writ issued against an anti-semitic and conspiratorial website', the website joins the list of the sectarian storytellers, where we can read in a resentful and very subjective rag published on (Caroline Fourest's site): ' [...] The text, extracted from 'Les Indigènes de la République' website, has already been republished by Bellaciao, Indymedia / Paris Ile-de-France, or the anti-Semitic and conspiracy focused website ' [Link to the article]

Alterinfo declares: "That we are being blamed, for lack of other lies, to be conspiracy focused doesn't bother us, and we claim our "conspira-Zionism", but the anti-Semitism, in addition to being an offence, we strongly deny; we shall see at the appropriate moment (when we have the financial means) if the justice will pronounce fairly on this issue."

The AlterInfo editors denounce the UEJF and AIPJ method which, according to them, follow the same logic: "Failing to silence us, they want to ruin us financially and psychologically in order to hinder our association's proper functioning".

The site appealed for donations on January 11th, to deal with expenses induced by the procedure. On February 18th, the association paid 9200 Euros for lawyer's fees, which covers "hardly half the expenses generated by this case". The pleading hearing for the appeal is scheduled on April 16th, 2008 at 2 pm; to send your donation please click here.

AlterInfo is in good standing among the French alternative media. "In January, the site had 312,749 visits and 1,686,434 readings for 171,503 different IP addresses. The number of readers of our site irritates, and perhaps even frightens, certain groups ", declares Alterinfo.

Among these site visitors are several renowned readers and institutions, all identified by their connection IP. "The diversity and relevance of the published texts seem to interest many more people than our opponents would like us to believe. If, as our detractors assume, our guests were only nut-cases or vulgar anti-Semites, how do you explain our readers' diversity?

To illustrate their deviancy and demonstrate that their charges are only fantasy, we retain listings of the connection IPs of the governmental institutions - governments and parliaments as well as various ministries (national and foreign), even the Elysée (French Presidency) occasionally (by the way, what could the president advisors look for on our site?) What is indicated by these numerous financial institutions - central banks of various countries, even the World Bank An-Interview-With-Alan-Patricof coming to glean information from our site, and the various national trade media which regularly also visit our pages?", reports Alterinfo.

These legal proceedings are all the more surprising as Alterinfo deals with the problems of Zionism (a xenophobic political ideology which is among others promulgated by Christians and condemned by numerous Jews) and emphasizes frequently the distinction, which it makes, between Zionism and Judaism.

Is it factual to call a person anti-American who criticizes Dick Cheney's neoliberal political ideology?

Don't be mistaken, in this case, it is the freedom of speech on the Internet that is targeted. AlterInfo needs you... NOW!

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for the good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

"It is not our detractors who will close our site and associative news agency, but the passivity and/or the laxness of our most diligent readers and our supposed supporters and their reaction to our current financial difficulties."

"Those who filed this lawsuit thought indeed that even if we won in the summary judgment or in appeal, we would be financially 'weakened'. If they partially 'succeeded', it becomes clear how many supporters we have, and to a certain extent, they only strengthened our determination to continue, and brought more attention to our purpose and cause. Furthermore, they gave us the occasion to see who were our true friends, and it is priceless.", declared Alterinfo editors.

Here are the four news releases published by the AlterInfo website to

- Alter Info communiqué (UEJF and AIPJ vs. Alter Info case) January 11th, 2008.

- Report: UEJF and J'ACCUSE vs. Alter Info -January 20th, 2008.

- Results of our call to donation and projects for the continuation [Alter Info editorial staff] - February 18th, 2008.

-Bis repetita UEJF/J'ACCUSE contre Alter Info: L'assignation en référé, nouveau procédé de censure ? - Zeynel CEKICI, Alterinfo's chief editor - 18 mars 2008

[1] The Union of the Jewish students of France ( UEJF) is a student association created in 1944, which represents the Jewish students in France (Wikipedia).

[2] J'Accuse (I accuse) - International Association for Justice (AIPJ), was founded in 2001, notably by people in charge of UEJF and LICRA. Marc KNOBEL,
researcher at the CRIF and at the Simon Wiesenthal Center is the president. About this matter, it is interesting to have a look at the text "The thought Police: CRIF at the National Magistracy School" on

[3] The French Jewish Organizations Council (known also under the CRIF acronym) federates, within a single representative organization, various
political, social or religious leanings in the French Jewry. To date, the CRIF federates more than sixty associations, among which the Unified Jewish Social Fund and the Universal Jewish Alliance (Wikipedia).

[reader comments]

3. Posté par Frank Fredenburg le 22/03/2008 21:32

When will the people of the West wake up and realize it is Jewish Groups that are behind the movement to destroy our freedoms. They are behind Mass Immigration and MultiCulturalism. Zionism controls the Jewish State and the Jewish groups in the West. Here is a sample, of what Zionism believes in.

" Our race is the Master Race. We are divine Gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. in fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."

Menachem Begin - Israeli Prime Minister Zionist Terrorist

4. Posté par Cola le 23/03/2008 06:28

Please excuse me, for I don`t speak a word of French but I feel the need to post a comment.

I only hope that the people of France and Germany and all European countries (and many other countries like where I live) retake your countries from your traitorous, jew terrorist rodent scum puppet governments so that your cultures etc. stay intact.

I cannot believe you have an ex-mossad terrorist as your president.

5. Posté par almohades le 23/03/2008 12:56

Et ben dites-donc ! pour des defenseurs de la liberté de l'expression , ces attaques du crif ou je ne sais quoi, ne traduisent ni plus ni moins le monde totalitaire et dictatorial d'aujourd'hui !

On va voir la suite et on s'exprimera comme dans un monde democratique et "civilisé" ?!
Messieurs les censeurs du crif et compagnie: à bon entendeur salut !

6. Posté par al akl le 23/03/2008 14:24

C'est clair que les articles devraient être en plusieurs langues, car la traduction automatique dénature les propos. Le monde entier est en train d'émerger de son sommeil, et tous voient le sionisme comme le principal ennemi de l'humanité. Enfin ceux qui ne mettent pas tout de suit des lunettes en bois pour éviter les migraines... Merci a SOTT.
Il manque maintenant de sites qui lient tous ces résistants à ZOG. Mais ça arrive.

8. Posté par Frank Friedenberg le 23/03/2008 19:33

More Zionist bragging.

"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that..I want to tell you something very clear: Don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it." - Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.

Zionism is Jewish Supremacism! Clear and simple. These people are snakes. I take that back. I apologize to the Snake Kingdom. Snakes have there place to play in our world and the order of nature. These monsters, serve no useful purpose, to our planet.
I'm afraid I'm not up on my French either and I'm dying to know what the people of France think of this issue. Millions of people around the world speak English, but don't speak French, if any of the French people that make statements on here, speak English, could you write a sentence or two in English, so we can get an idea what your feelings are, on this issue.

France is a beautiful country with a rich culture. Please don't allow these BLOODSUCKERS to destroy it. France is certainly worth saving. What do they keep doing? They keep telling the world, that the French people are very anti semitic. I hear that remark often. All they are, is VAMPIRES. They will keep drawing the blood out of your country and mine, until there isn't any left, to draw. Then they will move, to their next victim. A more evil bunch, has never existed. Look at that statement by Menachem Begin, that I listed above. Now who was it, that made statements like that????????????? I'll think of it in a second. MASTER RACE?????????????? INFERIOR RACES ?????????????? I know now, it was non other than Adolph Hitler.

Wait a minute, I just noticed something, AshkeNAZI and German NAZI. Isn't there some kind of a similarity there? Maybe t is just me.

10. Posté par Trinidad le 24/03/2008 10:27

Hi, you ask what the French think of the issue of antisemitism and zionism : I'll say French people are no better than the rest of the sleeping masses all over the world. The fact that we have, here in France, a large Arabic population, doesn't change the fact that the Zionist lobbies rule, and the Arabs are looked down on, and are the scapegoats of today -- potential evil terrorists.

The Jewish lobby's very strong in France, like everywhere else in the West -- politicians are their puppets. And people don't have a clue (generally speaking).

11. Posté par Frank Friedenberg le 24/03/2008 18:52

I'm sorry to hear that! I was hoping to hear that they are getting angry. The Sun Newspaper, has an Internet site where people can give their views about different subjects. The Sun is a British tabloid Britney-Spears-Career-Analysis Feb-08 type paper. I went on their recently to see what the English people think, of what is going on in the world. I've try to mention Zionism and the threat it posses to the West. I've gotten a pretty bland response. They continually complain about the state of their country and the crime and Mass Immigration. But as soon as you mention the word Jew, then you either get one response or the other. One is to just ignore you and the other is to start calling you names. I can see that the British people are totally asleep. I have some French, from my mothers side of the family, so I have an interest in France. As I said before, France is worth saving! What is it with the European people, that they have so little regard for their countries? At least there is some signs, that Americans are waking up. I hope it continues!

Thank you for responding to my request. I'll be watching to see if any others, show an interest. Good luck with your country and lets pray that your people and mine surprise the Zionists.
Old August 14th, 2008 #14
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

French Jewish group to sue YouTube
Published: Thursday, August 14, 2008

PARIS - A French Jewish group said Thursday it is suing the YouTube video-sharing website over a clip showing a host of Jewish public figures to the soundtrack of a pre-war anti-Semitic song.

The video posted on the U.S. site YouTube and its French rival Dailymotion shows a slideshow of more than 150 French politicians, TV stars, journalists, writers, philosophers, actors, singers and comedians.

It is set to the sound of a song recorded before World War II, called "Rebecca's wedding," which describes the guests at a Jewish wedding as dirty, rude and dishonest.

"We consider this video, though it names no-one, to be a photographic list of an anti-Semitic nature and therefore liable to criminal prosecution," the head of the National Bureau of Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism (BNVCA), Sammy Ghozlan, said in a statement.

He said he filed suit against Dailymotion and the author of the video on Tuesday, and intended to take similar action against YouTube after discovering it too was hosting the clip.

The anti-Semitism bureau took legal action earlier this week after it found a Paris store selling T-shirts printed with the phrase "Jews forbidden from entering the park," in German and Polish.

A Chinese woman and her daughter, who run the store in the multi-ethnic Belleville neighbourhood of Paris, were later arrested and are facing possible charges of incitement to racial hatred, judicial officials said Thursday.

Investigators are trying to track down who manufactured, distributed and imported the T-shirts, whose inscriptions are reproduced from 1940 banners that targeted the Jews of Lodz, central Poland.

Poland was occupied by Nazi Germany at that time, and 95 percent of the 200,000 Jews held in the Lodz ghetto eventually died in concentration camps.

Belleville, in the northeast of the capital, has been the scene of clashes between gangs of Jewish and north African youths, in which a 17-year-old Jewish boy was seriously injured in June.

France is home to Europe's largest Jewish commuity, estimated at 600,000 people, and its largest Muslim community, at around five million.
Old June 16th, 2009 #15
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Interesting tidbit from Michael Burleigh's "The Third Reich, A New History" (2000).

Something interesting. With the arrival of the Nazis came freer speech:

In August 1940, the Vichy government repealed the Law Marchandeau, which had suppressed explicit antisemitism in the French press. This meant that France's not inconsiderable number of otherwise highly gifted antisemite could publish what they liked.
Old June 16th, 2009 #16
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Notice the way your attitude toward the jew defines you in the eyes of Systemics and courtier historians like Burleigh. It's like calling someone an anti-fluite because he doesn't like a dangerous, disgusting disease. An ordinary attitude toward an unpleasant aspect of reality hardly defines the observer - except in a system controlled by the disease.
Old January 31st, 2014 #17
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Anti-Semitic Comedian 'A Victim of His Own Fascism'

Standard jew practice: commit act of aggression against enemies, then claim they're doing it to themselves

Sec. Gen. of European Jewish Congress calls Dieudonne an 'embarrassment to France' the day after anti-Semitic Paris march.

By Ari Soffer (jew)

neo-Nazi march in Greece (illustration)
[gee, if i recall, these in the picture aren't neo-nazis, they're leftists protesting Merke's visit. but if that's true, then jew Ari and jew paper Israel National News are...liars]


Anti-Semitic comic Dieudonne M'Bala M'Bala and his followers may consider himself a victim of "the system", but he is in fact simply a victim "of his own fascist convictions", according to a prominent European Jewish leader.

Secretary General of the European Jewish Congress, Serge Cwajgenbaum, told Arutz Sheva that French authorities eventually were forced to crack down on Dieudonne - after long being accused of ineffectiveness against rising anti-Semitism - as his actions became "an embarrassment to France". Dieudonne's performances, which often feature Holocaust denial, anti-Jewish stereotypes and other forms of anti-Semitism, have been banned by authorities, and the hatemonger now faces criminal charges connected to past breaches of race-hate laws.

Cwajgenbaum, himself a French Jew, was speaking at the European Parliament during the International Holocaust Remembrance Day commemorations there earlier this week. He explained to Arutz Sheva how the initiative - the brainchild of the European Jewish Congress - gained traction and is now a permanent feature of the EU's calendar.

Regarding the controversial "quenelle" gesture - an inverted Nazi salute popularized by Dieudonne - Cwajgenbaum said he had no doubt it was anti-Semitic. Dieudonne had initially linked it to anti-Semitism himself, despite presently denying that was his intention, and the symbol is a way for extremists to identify with each other and share anti-Semitic sentiments, he said.

[in english]

EJC represents kikes in 40 countries. Defends and pursues their JEWISH interests. Does any body represent and defend and pursue your interests, white man?

Participants at the EU ceremony in Brussels joined French and other European Jewish leaders in voicing concern over an alarming rise in anti-Semitism in France, as well as the rise of fascism in Greece and Hungary. Speaking at the event, Greek Prime Minister Antonis Samaras assured the audience that his government was taking the rise of the far-right, anti-Semitic Golden Dawn party very seriously, and emphasized that European leaders had an obligation to ensure that "nothing even remotely like" the Holocaust would ever happen again.

The threat of French anti-Semitism was rammed home just the day before, when an anti-government march in Paris degenerated into a shocking display of hate, as large portions of the 17,000-strong crowd chanted virulently anti-Semitic slogans including "Jews out of France!" and "Jews, France is not for you!"

That is wonderful.

France's Jewish community - the third largest in the world (after Israel and the US) - is seeing an unprecedented exodus, go rats go! may you all drown in the Mediterranean, rat jews and the continuing tide of anti-Semitism has triggered preparations in Israel for a major influx of olim (immigrants to Israel) from the country.

A recent poll by the EU's Fundamental Rights Agency recorded that 40% of French Jews fear publicly identifying as Jews, and that 75% of European Jews feel that anti-Semitism is on the rise.
Old July 17th, 2014 #18
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

Member of French National Front jailed after she compared country's black justice minister to a monkey on Facebook

- Anne-Sophie Leclere has been jailed for nine months and fined almost £30k
- The mother-of-three was due to be a candidate in local elections this year
- The National Front has called her sentence 'revolting' and 'excessive'

A female member of France’s far-right National Front party has been sent to prison for nine months for comparing the country’s black justice minister to a monkey on Facebook.

Anne-Sophie Leclere, a 34-year-old mother of three who was due to be a candidate in local elections this year, must also pay a fine equivalent to almost £30,000, and has been banned from seeking office for five years.
Her party immediately condemned a sentence which it believes is among the harshest ever handed down over a social media posting.

Ms Leclere was standing in Rethel, in the Ardennes region of eastern France, but it was a court in the overseas territory of Cayenne, French Guiana, which found her guilty.

The court heard how Ms Leclere published a picture of a baby monkey, with the caption ‘At 18 months’.

Next to it was a picture of justice minister Christiane Taubira, 62, above the word: ‘Now’.

During a TV documentary, Ms Leclere defended her post, insisting Ms Taubira was ‘a savage’, who was ruining France with her Socialist policies.

Ms Leclere said of Ms Taubira, who was born in French Guiana: ‘Honestly, she’s a wild animal, coming on TV with that devil’s smile. I’d prefer to see her swinging from a tree than in government.’

Ms Leclere, who was reported to the police by an anti-racism group in French Guiana, added: ‘I have friends who are black.’

Following the court judgement, she insisted ‘I did not make racist remarks even though my comments on television were clumsy.

The photo was posted on my Facebook page and I took it off a few days later. I was not the creator of this photograph. I have received several messages of support,’ she added.

A National Front spokesman said the sentence was ‘revolting’ and ‘excessive’, and would appeal.

He said: ‘This must be the one of the harshest sentences handed out in long time for freedom of speech.'

The National Front is currently riding high in opinion polls in France, having won 25 per cent of the popular vote in European elections in May with its anti-immigration, anti-EU agenda.

Its leader Marine Le Pen has been trying to soften its xenophobic image by broadening the party’s appeal, and Ms Leclere was one of a number of women candidates selected to do this.

Ms Taubira has suffered racist insults in France in the past, including having people wave bananas at her.

Last edited by Alex Linder; July 17th, 2014 at 08:58 AM.
Old October 29th, 2014 #19
Alex Linder
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,499
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder

French "hate speech" lawsuit leading to worldwide online censorship

The Jewish Daily Forward recently published an article describing how large Internet-based social media companies, including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, are dealing with online "hate speech," particularly in the aftermath of a judicial ruling roughly one year ago in France that required Twitter to remove "anti-Semitic" content. The article notes:

A little over a year after a French court forced Twitter to remove some anti-Semitic content, experts say the ruling has had a ripple effect, leading other Internet companies to act more aggressively against hate speech in an effort to avoid lawsuits.

The 2013 ruling by the Paris Court of Appeals settled a lawsuit brought the year before by the Union of Jewish Students of France over the hashtag #UnBonJuif, which means “a good Jew” and which was used to index thousands of anti-Semitic comments that violated France’s law against hate speech.

Since then, YouTube has permanently banned videos posted by Dieudonne, a French comedian with 10 convictions for inciting racial hatred against Jews. And in February, Facebook removed the page of French Holocaust denier Alain Soral for “repeatedly posting things that don’t comply with the Facebook terms,” according to the company. Soral’s page had drawn many complaints in previous years but was only taken down this year.

“Big companies don’t want to be sued,” said Konstantinos Komaitis, a former academic and current policy adviser at the Internet Society, an international organization that encourages governments to ensure access and sustainable use of the Internet. “So after the ruling in France, we are seeing an inclination by Internet service providers like Google, YouTube, Facebook to try and adjust their terms of service — their own internal jurisprudence — to make sure they comply with national laws.”

The change comes amid a string of heavy sentences handed down by European courts against individuals who used online platforms to incite to racism or violence.

On Monday, a British court sentenced one such offender to four weeks in jail for tweeting “Hitler was right” to a Jewish lawmaker. Last week, a court in Geneva sentenced a man to five months in jail for posting texts that deny the Holocaust. And in April, a French court sentenced two men to five months in jail for posting an anti-Semitic video.

“The stiffer sentences owe partly to a realization by judges of the dangers posed by online hatred, also in light of cyber-jihadism and how it affected people like Mohammed Merah,” said Christophe Goossens, the legal adviser of the Belgian League against Anti-Semitism, referring to the killer of four Jews at a Jewish school in Toulouse in 2012.

In the Twitter case, the company argued that as an American firm it was protected by the First Amendment. But the court rejected the argument and forced Twitter to remove some of the comments and identify some of the authors. It also required the company to set up a system for flagging and ultimately removing comments that violate hate speech laws. [...]
Ultimately, the organized international Jewish community and their puppets controlling the political, financial, and media establishment of the Western world want to outlaw any criticism or exposure of their agenda, activities, and criminality under the auspices of "hate speech." The greatest tool for mass communication and free, independent thought - the Internet - is under a well-organized and financed attack led primarily by international Jewry.

Posted by John Friend at 10:15 AM


Display Modes

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.
Page generated in 0.22423 seconds.