Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old November 8th, 2014 #21
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default

 
Old November 19th, 2014 #22
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities explained
Kevin MacDonald on July 16, 2010 — 158 Comments

Steve Sailer has an important blog at VDARE.com quoting from Russel K. Nieli’s essay on No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life by Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Radford. It’s no surprise that there is affirmative action for Blacks and Latinos: “To have the same chances of gaining admission as a black student with an SAT score of 1100, an Hispanic student otherwise equally matched in background characteristics would have to have a 1230, a white student a 1410, and an Asian student a 1550.”

Unfortunately, the authors lump Jews and non-Jews into the White category, but combining their results with what we know about Jewish admissions to elite universities yields some interesting results.

In a 1998 op-ed (“Some minorities are more minor than others”), Ron Unz pointed out “Asians comprise between 2% and 3% of the U.S. population, but nearly 20% of Harvard undergraduates. Then too, between a quarter and a third of Harvard students identify themselves as Jewish, while Jews also represent just 2% to 3% of the overall population. Thus, it appears that Jews and Asians constitute approximately half of Harvard’s student body, leaving the other half for the remaining 95% of America” (See also Edmund Connelly’s take.) A 2009 article in the Daily Princetonian (“Choosing the Chosen People”) cited data from Hillel, a Jewish campus organization, that with the exception of Princeton and Dartmouth, on average Jews made up 24% of Ivy League undergrads. (Princeton had only 13% Jews, leading to much anxiety and a drive to recruit more Jewish students. The rabbi leading the campaign said she “would love 20 percent”—an increase from over 6 times the Jewish percentage in the population to around 10 times.)

Jews therefore constitute a vastly disproportionate share of the population classified as White at elite universities. Data from an earlier study by Espenshade show that around half of the students at elite universities are classified as White, suggesting that Jews and non-Jews classified as White are approximately equal in numbers. (Given that students from the Middle East are also classified as White, there is the suggestion that Jews outnumber non-Jewish students of Christian European descent.)

One might simply suppose that this is due to higher Jewish IQ. However, on the basis of Richard Lynn’s estimates of Ashkenazi Jewish IQ and correcting for the greater numbers of European Whites, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews should be around 7 to 1 (IQ >130) or 4.5 to 1 (IQ > 145). Instead, the ratio of non-Jewish Whites to Jews is around 1 to 1 or less. (See here.)

So there must be some other reason besides IQ that Jews are such a large percentage of the population classified as White at elite universities.

Espenshade and Radford show that there is discrimination against poor Whites and against non-urban Whites—exactly the population groups that are least likely to be Jewish. There is a “a general disregard for improving the admission chances of poor and otherwise disadvantaged whites.”

When lower-class whites are matched with lower-class blacks and other non-whites the degree of the non-white advantage becomes astronomical: lower-class Asian applicants are seven times as likely to be accepted to the competitive private institutions as similarly qualified whites, lower-class Hispanic applicants eight times as likely, and lower-class blacks ten times as likely. These are enormous differences and reflect the fact that lower-class whites were rarely accepted to the private institutions Espenshade and Radford surveyed. Their diversity-enhancement value was obviously rated very low.

One possible explanation is that the desire for better off students reflects the universities’ desire to have students who are better able to pay their way, so that more money can be diverted to less well-off non-Whites. Nieli points out that this “cannot explain why well-qualified lower-class whites are not at least offered admission without financial aid. The mere offer of admission is costless, and at least a few among the poor whites accepted would probably be able to come up with outside scholarship aid.” Right.

Nieli suggests that the real reason that rejecting less well-off Whites benefits the university is because it raises the yield score (the ratio of those accepted to those who enroll) and lowers the acceptance rate (the ratio of applicants received to those accepted) on the theory that less well-off Whites would not be able to afford to attend without scholarship money that the university wants to reserve for non-Whites. This makes them look good to the rating agencies.

This explanation seems rather ad hoc. Quite a few less well-off Whites would doubtless be willing to take out loans in order to satisfy their dream of an education at an elite university. To be convincing, Nieli should at least have some data supporting his theory. Even an anecdote or a colorful story gleaned from an academic cocktail party would be nice.

The other finding is

what might be called an urban/Blue State bias against rural and Red State occupations and values. This is most clearly shown in a little remarked statistic in the study’s treatment of the admissions advantage of participation in various high school extra-curricular activities. In the competitive private schools surveyed participation in many types of extra-curricular activities — including community service activities, performing arts activities, and “cultural diversity” activities — conferred a substantial improvement in an applicant’s chances of admission. The admissions advantage was usually greatest for those who held leadership positions or who received awards or honors associated with their activities. No surprise here — every student applying to competitive colleges knows about the importance of extracurriculars.

But what Espenshade and Radford found in regard to what they call “career-oriented activities” was truly shocking even to this hardened veteran of the campus ideological and cultural wars. Participation in such Red State activities as high school ROTC, 4-H clubs, or the Future Farmers of America was found to reduce very substantially a student’s chances of gaining admission to the competitive private colleges in the NSCE database on an all-other-things-considered basis. The admissions disadvantage was greatest for those in leadership positions in these activities or those winning honors and awards. … Excelling in these activities “is associated with 60 or 65 percent lower odds of admission.”

It’s interesting that the bias against Red State interests holds even when controlling for other variables such as family income. These students are being rejected not because of their family income but because of their attitudes and interests–a finding that casts doubt on the yield rate/acceptance rate explanation for the bias against less well-off Whites as well.

These data strongly suggest that Jewish overrepresentation at elite universities has nothing to do with IQ but with discrimination against non-Jewish White Americans, especially those from the working class or with rural origins. It would be interesting to see the dynamics of the admissions process. How many admissions officers are Jewish? And, whether or not they are Jewish,what pressures are they under to admit Jewish students? The brouhaha that engulfed the Princeton campus because Jews were “only” overrepresented by around 6.5 times their percentage of the population suggests that there is considerable pressure for high levels of Jewish admission. The Daily Princetonian ran four front-page articles on the topic, and the New York Times ran an article titled “The Princeton Puzzle.” (See here; the original NYTimes article is here.) Clearly anything less than 20% Jewish enrollment would be met with raised eyebrows and perhaps intimations of anti-Semitism.

The big picture is that this is a prime example of the corruption of our new elite. As noted previously, the poster child for this corruption is the nomination of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court. The fact that she is a Princeton graduate now makes even more sense given that when she went to Princeton the percentage of Jews was around 18% — more in line with the de facto affirmative action policies favoring Jews that we see now in most Ivy League universities.

Whatever else one can say about the new elite, it certainly does not believe in merit. The only common denominator is that Whites of European extraction are being systematically excluded and displaced to the point that they are now underrepresented in all the important areas of the elite compared to their percentage of the population.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...ies-explained/

[normal whites are locked out of the better universities, but this is a double-edged score, as staying away from uni means avoiding debt, if the white is smart]
 
Old November 29th, 2014 #23
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

duke on jews being a race not a religion. a race that tries to destroy other races while denying that it itself is a race.
 
Old January 10th, 2015 #24
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
RickHolland
Default



Jews create Jews Only Parliament for Europe

http://davidduke.com/jewish-extremis...ly-parliament/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Jewish_Parliament

http://ejp.eu/

Quote:

Commentary from David Duke. Can you imagine what would happen if White Europeans decided they would create a Parliament for only White people? Every Jew would be screaming “racist” on their Jew run media outlets and cry millions of tears about it.



The recent inaugural meeting of the first ever “European Jewish Parliament”—which took place in the official European Union Parliamentary building complex—is a racially-based, Jews-only organization designed to serve the interests of that group only.

All peoples, of all races and all nations, have the right to elect bodies which govern themselves and look after their own interests. This is the principle of self-determination, which is written into the United Nations’ Founding Charter.

Yet, these very same Jewish extremists who openly flaunt their Jews-only parliament before the world, are at the forefront in denying that vey same right to all other people.



In Palestine, ordinary Palestinian people have been robbed of their land, murdered, terrorized and abused for daring to try and elect am authority which represented their interests.

In America, Jewish Supremacist extremists in the ADL, the “Southern Povery Law Center” and the Simon Wiesenthal Center” are at the forefront of suppressing any attempt by European-Americans or African-Americans to assert their political rights and to stand up for their communities.

This vicious double standard applies equally to pro-European American politicians and activists such as David Duke as much as it does to Afro-American activists such as Louis Farrakhan.

In addition, Jewish extremist organizations such as the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, which specialize in importing as many diverse “immigrants” as possible into America, are part of a larger Jewish Supremacist network which rigorously polices the ethnic purity of Israel and warns against “losing Jewish identity” by allowing non-Jews into the Zionist state.

In Europe, Jewish supremacist organizations in every nation are at the forefront of suppressing any form of self-determination for Europeans. They use the code word of “anti-racist” for their anti-European activities, in exactly the same way they use the “anti-Semitism” codeword for anyone who criticizes the activities of the racist Zionist state of Israel.

In the Middle East, Zionist agents regularly murder and assassinate opponents, in Gaza, Dubai, Iran and other nations, all in the name of “preserving Israel.”

The existence of the European Jewish Parliament, to whom Jews from all over Europe were elected—by other Jews, after a careful screening and registration process (no doubt to make sure they were only dealing with bona fide Jews) was first envisioned by Zionist extremist Shimon Peres, former President of the state of Israel who is credited with bringing nuclear weapons to the Middle East.



According to its own publicity material, the European Jewish Parliament would “ensure that the interests of Jewish communities are included and properly represented” and that only “Jews residing in the EU countries and countries of the EJU family . . . will have an opportunity to be elected and to elect the Parliament.”

Of course, the very notion of a Jews-only parliament is contrary to EU anti-discrimination laws—which some of the Jewish extremist members of the new Jews-only parliament, in their capacities as EU members of parliament, helped draw up.

According to EU law, it is illegal to discriminate against anyone on the basis of color, gender, religion or ethnic origin—and a Jews-only parliament therefore discriminates against non-Jews by its very nature.

Imagine the outcry from these same Jewish supremacists if Germans—or any other nation on earth—elected elected a parliament from which Jews were specifically excluded.

The Jewish extremists would be crying “racism” and “anti-Semitism” from the rooftops –but in the hypocritical upside down world of Jewish Supremacy, it is perfectly acceptable to have a Jews-only parliament to “serve their interests.”
http://www.dailyslave.com/jews-creat...nt-for-europe/
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old January 10th, 2015 #25
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
RickHolland
Default

Israel won't recognize Armenian genocide, says ambassador

Quote:
Israel does not plan to recognize the Armenian genocide perpetrated by Turkey, Rafael Harpaz, Israel's ambassador to Azerbaijan, told Azeri website Trend.

“Israel is a democratic country, everybody has two opinions, not one opinion,” Harpaz said. “The government has a very clear opinion.”

He said Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman had made Israel's policy clear.

Harpaz told Trend he hoped Israel's troubled relations with Turkey would improve.

"There are enough common interests and issues in the world for us to cooperate,” Harpaz reportedly said. “I would like to take an example of Turkish Airlines. Turkish Airlines is the biggest foreign airline which is active in Israel. Istanbul is the biggest hub for Israelis. The same goes for tourism, trade which is up. We hope that our political relations with Turkey will improve."

Harpaz has served as Israel's ambassador to Azerbaijan since 2012.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.636058
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old February 3rd, 2015 #26
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,904
Robbie Key
Default

Charlie Hebdo — The Gift That Keeps Giving

Francis Carr Begbie on February 3, 2015 — 2 Comments

The Charlie Hebdo affair is the gift that keeps on giving if you want to understand the contours of power in the West today. There are many past incidents which, although trifling at the time, now take on a whole new importance when seen through the lens of Charlie Hebdo — this solid gold BBC radio debate is one of them.

On Holocaust Memorial Day 2013 the Sunday Times ran a Gerald Scarfe cartoon which showed a bloodthirsty Binyamin Netanyaju cementing up a wall with the bodies of dead Palestinians. It was a gory, tasteless work which was par for the course for the artist and which would seem to fall well within the lampoonists terms of engagement as claimed by the post-modern supporters of #JeSuisCharlie — i.e. nothing is sacred and no-one is beyond satire.



Except, as Gerald Scarfe was to discover, it turned out that some things are very much untouchable and unsayable. For the organised Jewish community reacted with predictable well-orchestrated incandescent rage and, equally predictably, the fearless News International caved in, withdrew the cartoon and responded with a fulsome apology from Rupert Murdoch himself.

Despite Murdoch’s apology, the affair soon escalated. The Board of Jewish Deputies complained to the press regulator; the UK Chief Rabbi Lord Sacks said it had “caused immense pain to the Jewish community in the UK and around the world”. The Israeli ambassador was outraged. The Speaker of the House in Tel Aviv called on his Jewish counterpart in the House of Commons to take action. Even Tony Blair waded in. The Sunday Times set up immediate meetings to placate the Jewish community. Eventually Gerald Scarfe apologised for the “timing” of the cartoon. As a demonstration of national and international community power and a warning to others, it was impressive.

Remember, all this happened the year before Operation Preventive Edge and the slaughter of more than 2000 Palestinians in Israeli bombardments. In the BBC radio debate the argument for a cartoonist’s free speech is made by that staunch man of the left, Guardian cartoonist Steve Bell, while his opponent is the pugnacious editor of the Jewish Chronicle , Stephen Pollard.


Summarised, Pollard’s position seems to be that free speech is absolute, except that one must be aware of the consequences — in this case, offending the Jewish community and then dealing with threats of losing one’s job, etc. What that comes down to is that any any images of Israelis spilling the blood of Palestinians is off-limits because for Jews this dredges up memories of accusations that Jews ritually sacrificed non-Jewish children during the Middle Ages. This of course neatly de-legitimises any mention of the deaths of children in the Gaza massacres. The same logic would apply to any critical depiction of the culture of the Holocaust.

The “blood sacrifice” angle, which must have baffled many listeners, gave Pollard a peg to hang his argument on. He took particular exception to the illustration of blood dripping off Netanyahu’s trowel. He makes the assertion that the cartoon amounts repeating the “blood libel” that non-Jewish children are ritually sacrificed by the Jews. He also asserted that such criticisms are illegitimate and should not be published on Holocaust Memorial Day, a self-serving argument if ever there was one.

Bell’s response is half-hearted and uninformed. “The problem with this argument is that extraneous emotions like blood libel are drawn in,” he says feebly. Bell said the cartoon was anti-Netanyahu rather than anti-Jewish. Pollard was having none of it. “I defy anyone not to see that this cartoon is about Benjamin Netanyahu glorifying in the blood of Palestinians.”

So the pattern of complete intolerance to criticism of Israel, even in cartoon fashion, was there two years ago. But now thanks to the Charlie Hebdo affair, we have a prism through which to view it clearly. The Jews as an elite group will react to a cartoon they find offensive by demanding apologies and doing their best to get the culprit fired. In any case, they have raised the costs of printing any cartoon that even mentions that Israelis have shed the blood of Palestinians. Cartoonists like Scarfe and Bell will certainly think twice before they produce a similar cartoon.

Muslims, as a non-elite group, have no other option than to react to such cartoons with murder. The same can be said about Muslim reaction to politicians who oppose Muslim immigration. Which is why Geert Wilders is under protective guard at all times.

But in either case, the bottom line is to control public discourse related to their ethnic group.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...-keeps-giving/
 
Old February 7th, 2015 #27
RickHolland
Bread and Circuses
 
RickHolland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Jewed Faggot States of ApemuriKa
Posts: 6,666
Blog Entries: 1
RickHolland
Default

Charity Commission is protecting sham charities – not only tax scams for the wealthy but also ethnic cleansers of Palestine

Quote:
“William Shawcross, resigned as director of The Henry Jackson Society, a right wing ‘think-tank’ which advocates war with Iran, to take up his current position as Chair of the Charity Commission. Shawcross is a former trustee of the Anglo-Israel Association, and was a founder member of the Friends of Israel Initiative which pledges to stand “in a spirit of solidarity with the State of Israel… inside the institutions of the international community”.

The Charity Commission “is not fit for purpose”, according to Chair of the Public Accounts Committee, Margaret Hodge MP, who has raised the option of scrapping it. Hodge was responding to a National Audit Office (NAO) report that concluded the Charity Commission is not tackling abuses of charitable status effectively.

The NAO published an accompanying report on the case of The Cup Trust, a sham charity tax scam for the wealthy; the “charity” bought and sold bonds among its members to the tune of £46 million purely for purposes of tax avoidance. Since the scam started in 2010 with the sham charity’s registration, The Cup Trust had a total income of £176m out of which £152,292 was released in grants to charitable causes. According to the NAO, the Charity Commission should never have allowed The Cup Trust to register as a charity in the first place or allow it to keep its charitable status even after its unsuitability was flagged up.

Under pressure, the Charity Commission had no option but to open an inquiry, and launched enquiries in both 2010 and again in 2011 but then concluded that The Cup Trust’s charitable status could not be revoked because it claimed to have been set up for exclusively charitable purposes and it had made some miniscule grants, i.e. 3p went to charity from every £100 raised. The Commission claimed it was unable on these grounds alone to revoke The Cup Trust’s charitable status. The NAO slamed the Charities Commission for its “reliance on the view that tax avoidance schemes were a legitimate activity for charities and that it was for HMRC to pursue tax issues”.

The Jewish National Fund is another body whose charities the Charity Commission has long maintained on the register in the face of incontrovertible evidence that the JNF aims are contrary to the requirements of public benefit and that it is raising funds for largely non-charitable purposes. As with The Cup Trust, the Charity Commission has rebuffed all challenges to the charitable status of the JNF UK, the most recent by the Stop the JNF Campaign, on the grounds that the JNF claims to have been set up for purely charitable purposes and that it donates money to causes. In fact, the JNF UK is a branch of the international JNF-KKL, which is a para-statal organisation in Israel and an open participant in, and often the director of, the Israeli Government’s past and present ethnic cleansing operations in Israel/Palestine.

The JNF-KKL is involved in Israel’s Prawer Plan to forcibly drive up to 70,000 Palestinian citizens of Israel from their lands in the Naqab, in the South of Israel, and replace them with exclusively Jewish settlements. Calls for Israel to withdraw the Plan have come from many bodies, including the UN Committee on the Elimination for Racial Discrimination, the European Parliament,the UN Office for Human Rights, and Human Rights Watch. Israel has ignored the calls.

The JNF is a part of the Israeli Government, and is a key player in the Zionist programme to acquire land that cannot then be sold or leased to Palestinian citizens of Israel.
This egregious case of ethnic discrimination would be criminal if practiced in the UK. As the Stop the JNF Campaign has shown, the Charity Commission has ignored its own guidance when considering the charitable status of institutions operating abroad to “first consider whether they would be regarded as charities if their operations are confined to the United Kingdom”. Not only would the JNF charities not be charities; they would be liable to prosecution for criminal activities.

Those who run the Charity Commission were long aware of the cases made against both sham charities, The Cup Trust and the JNF UK. In both cases the Charity Commission’s arguments are shocking and unacceptable to virtually anyone appraised of what these bodies actually do. Sixty-eight MPs signed EDM1677 in 2011 calling for revocation of the JNF’s charitable status. No doubt alarmed at the potential damage from continuing an association with the JNF, given the rising awareness of the JNF’s activities, David Cameron resigned a JNF Patron in 2011. Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband have kept their distance, breaking a long-standing tradition whereby all three main party leaders became JNF Patrons on becoming party leader. Tony Blair remains a JNF Patron.

In its fund-raising for ethnic cleansing, the JNF has a strong ally in the Chair of the Charity Commission, Shawcross, who succeeded Dame Suzi Leather in 2002. To take on his new appointment Shawcross resigned as director of The Henry Jackson Society, a right wing ‘think-tank’, itself a very dubious registered charity and a vocal advocate for war with Iran. Shawcross is a militant Zionist, former trustee of the Anglo-Israeli Association, and as founder member of the Friends of Israel Initiative pledges to stand “in a spirit of solidarity with the State of Israel… inside the institutions of the international community”. The Charity Commission is one such “institution” where Shawcross operates as Chair “in a spirit of solidarity with the State of Israel” in its violations of Palestinian human rights.

The Charities Commission CEO, SAM younger, admitted on BBC Radio 4 this morning that the Charity Commission is defective “in identifying where serious wrongdoing is happening in charities”, but he pleaded that pressure of work meant they “rely on being able to identify…wrongdoing then dealing with it”. This will not wash in the case of the JNF’s sham charities, for the Stop the JNF Campaign – not to mention 70 MPs – identified the JNF’s wrongdoing very clearly. Younger also added bizarrely that “the test of being registered as a charity is your charitable purposes not your activities”. Read that again: as long as the paperwork is persuasive, then what they do is not important!

The scandal engulfing the Charity Commission is the latest failure of an oversight body charged with preventing crime and abuse in major UK institutions; the BBC promoted and protected Jimmy Savile throughout his lifelong career while he was widely known in the BBC canteen as a sexual predator; the majority of the MPs elected in 2005 to the Westminster Parliament were forced to repay expenses they had improperly (fraudulently?) claimed; the Press Complaints Commission issued a 2009 report dismissing claims of widespread phone hacking, the Independent Police Complaints Commission since its founding in 2004 has investigated over 800 deaths following police contact or in police custody without a single conviction. Bodies charged with safeguarding the elderly in care homes, or children in care, or standards in the NHS have all been embroiled in scandals. The Charities Commission is now the latest such exposure.

The Charity Commission maintained the charitable status of The Cup Trust scam over several years, but it has defended for decades a sham charity involved in Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. Indeed, such was the obviously non-charitable aims and activities of the JNF that when it was founded in 1901, the JNF’s own experts advised against seeking charitable status on the grounds that:

“if the purpose of the Fund, as stated in the resolution of the Zionist Congress, is to promote the return of the Jews to Palestine through purchasing land there and leasing it to Jewish settlers, we cannot state that the purpose is charitable within the framework of British Law… We therefore conclude that the purpose of the Fund will be a political rather than a charitable one…”.

The JNF UK charity the JNF Charitable Trust 2012 report confirms that the JNF’s main purpose, to realise the “Zionist dream”/nightmare, has not changed since 1901.

We can’t rely on government bureaucrats to clean up the Augean stable that the Charity Commission is revealed to be; we need a stronger campaign to build up public pressure against the criminal activity of the JNF-KKL and the JNF UK’s role.

Please join Stop the JNF UK and/or invite a speaker to your TU/church/student/campaign meeting.

Contact: [email protected] 07931 200 361
Website: www.stopthejnf.org
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stopthejnf

Stop the JNF Campaign submission to the Charity Commission:
http://www.stopthejnf.org/charity-co...-of-palestine/


Quote:
What is the JNF?

In 1901 delegates to the Fifth Zionist Congress in Basel decided to create Keren Kayemeth Lelsrael (KKL) - the Jewish National Fund (JNF). The purpose of the JNF was, and still is, to ‘acquire’ land for the establishment of the Zionist state of Israel in historic Palestine; and specifically “for the purpose of settling Jews on such land”. Crucially this land could never again be sold or leased to non-Jews.

Today the JNF enjoys charitable status in over 50 countries worldwide while their involvement in ethnic cleansing and colonisation is given cover by governments and political figures. In the UK, Gordon Brown and David Cameron, leaders of the two main political parties, are patrons of JNF UK.

The JNF, Colonisation and Ethnic Cleansing

The JNF was established as a principle Zionist tool for the colonisation of Palestine. Israel’s first Prime Minister made clear the intent of the Zionist movement towards the indigenous Palestinian population and their lands:
“If we want Hebrew redemption 100%, then we must have a 100% settlement, a 100% Hebrew farm, and a 100% Hebrew port” David Ben-Gurion, 1936

The JNF were actively involved in the process of ethnic cleansing prior to the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948:
“Transfer does not serve only one aim – to reduce the Arab population – it also serves a second purpose by no means less important, which is: to evict land now cultivated by Arabs and to free it for Jewish settlement” Yossef Weitz (Head of JNF Settlement Dept), 1940

The JNF is complicit in Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian territories and of the Golan Heights.
In the Jordan Valley, illegally occupied by Israel, and where Palestinians are denied access to land and water, the JNF funds reservoirs and parks for settler use only.
In the Golan Heights the JNF is working with the state of Israel to colonise Syrian land illegally occupied by Israel since 1967.


Racism and Apartheid Within Israel

The JNF today also has a direct role in implementing the racist policies of the state, continuing the dispossession of Palestinians still living inside Israel (20% of the population). 93% of the land in Israel is public land that is allocated as state property, JNF) or Development Authority. JNF policies directly prohibiting sale or lease of land to non-Jews is in practice to all 93% of state land since the JNF holds a majority in the Israeli Land Administration’s Council.

The Israeli government has targeted the Galilee and the Negev (al Naqab) as areas requiring ‘Judaisation’. These are currently important campaigns for the JNF in the UK and internationally. The JNF actively funds and builds on confiscated land while Bedouin residents have been forcibly relocated and refused access to their villages. JNF UK does not even recognise the existence of the Bedouin:“The central objective of the Charity... is to now also raise funds to allow the population of Israel to use... the Negev Desert which has previously been uninhabited.”

What Can I Do?

Join the international campaign to expose JNF involvement in ethnic cleansing and colonisation and help co-ordinate our actions to:

Take Legal action: challenge the charity status of the JNF and coordinate other judicial review process; support cases against the JNF by Palestinians whose land and property were stolen by the JNF and/or who were dispossessed by the JNF - from 1948 until today

Research and document JNF's activities, use of funds, and impact, support investigation into JNF funding of and participation in para-statal activities, collect testimonies, produce research reports and publications, write articles, publicize findings, collect land deeds, produce digital stories/videos of testimony and a book of specific cases that highlight JNF role in land confiscation and discrimination as part of a broader system of occupation and colonisation

Educate: produce printed materials, submit presentations for conferences, organize workshops and public speaking events, coordinate art exhibits, performances and speaking tours, create digital stories based on testimonies

Boycott and Disrupt JNF Events: JNF organises fundraisers, delegations, and cultural, educational, sporting and political events

Take Direct action: Petitions, letters, poster and sticker campaign, disruption of events, pickets, civil disobedience, demonstrations

Produce and influence mass and grassroots media: submit editorials and articles to print and online journals, organize press conferences, buy advertisement, produce grassroots media, produce and/or screen documentaries, produce and participate in public radio and television series, produce poster campaign

Support processes of accountability under international law: participate in review processes being organized by civil organizations to hold Israel accountable under human rights and other international law (i.e. review of Israel for its treaty implementation under the Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights)

Join the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Campaign National Committee (BNC), Palestine Solidarity Campaign, Habitat International Coalition of Cairo and the International Jewish anti-Zionist Network in coordinating this campaign.
http://cardiffpsc.weebly.com/jewish-...und---jnf.html
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H.
 
Old February 22nd, 2015 #28
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Views clash at trial of rabbi

Quote:
Views clash at trial of rabbi

Mendel Epstein is accused of using a kidnap team to force divorces.






TRENTON - Before prosecutors described Rabbi Mendel Epstein as a leader in a devout Orthodox community, they played a short, grainy video clip that they said showed he was a criminal.


"Basically, what we're going to be doing is kidnapping a guy for a couple hours," he is heard telling two undercover FBI agents about what prosecutors said was a kidnapping in 2013.

Opening statements began Wednesday in the trial of Epstein and his three codefendants: son David Epstein, Jay Goldstein, and Binyamin Stimler. Mendel Epstein, who is accused of employing a kidnap team to force unwilling Jewish husbands to divorce their wives, faces charges of conspiracy to commit kidnapping and attempted kidnapping. The others face similar charges stemming from a staged kidnapping in 2013 and three other forced divorces.

Defense attorney Robert Stahl disputed the charges and portrayed Mendel Epstein, 69, as a "champion of women's rights."

"This is not a band of criminals extorting men for money or beating them for money," Stahl said, arguing that Jewish law allows recalcitrant husbands to be forced into giving a divorce document known as a "get."
He called the husbands the villains as Epstein, dressed in a dark suit, silently nodded toward Stahl.

Prosecutors allege Epstein's team used brutal methods and tools, including handcuffs and electric cattle prods, to torture the men into granting divorces.

The alleged kidnap team brought surgical blades, a screwdriver, and rope to a staged kidnapping in 2013, authorities have said. Epstein allegedly told the undercover agents he arranged similar kidnappings every year or year and a half, U.S. Attorney Joseph Gribko said.

Gribko referred to the recordings throughout his opening statement, including of one Epstein allegedly describing how the cattle prods were used.

"If [the cattle prod] can get a bull that weighs five tons to move, you put it in certain parts of his body and in one minute the guy will know," prosecutors said Epstein told two undercover FBI agents who were posing as a brother and sister trying to force the sister's husband to grant the divorce.

Gribko said Epstein was recorded telling the agents the effort would cost $60,000.

Stahl, holding Epstein's 1989 book, A Woman's Guide to the Get Process, called Gribko's opening statement an "interesting and compelling story," but not evidence against Epstein.

Stahl argued that Epstein was simply good at advocating for women and that his reputation was "that he can convince these husbands to go give their wives a get." Stahl did not dispute that "some laws may have been broken along the way," but said that did not include kidnapping.

Stahl, along with the other defense attorneys, sought to discredit David Wax, a witness in the case. Wax is cooperating with prosecutors after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit kidnapping in a case in which he was paid $100,000 to force a Jewish man to divorce his wife.

Prosecutors are expected to play footage Thursday from recordings by undercover agents.







Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/news/lo...pWKxBpCK7Ae.99
 
Old March 27th, 2015 #29
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,342
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default


Israel has granted refugee status to 0.07% of African asylum seekers
http://mondoweiss.net/2015/02/refugee-african-seekers
 
Old May 3rd, 2015 #30
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Lol – israeli jews blame arab neighbors for halting progress towards a middle east free of nuclear weapons

Quote:
It seems as if with every passing day the Jews are proving that Adolf Hitler was 100% correct about them. Here you have the Israeli Jews blaming their Arab neighbors for standing in the way of achieving a Middle East free of nuclear weapons.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/i...-zone-30718083


This is ridiculous considering that Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and has refused to sign on to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. It doesn’t get much more hypocritical than this. Of course the Jews will never blame themselves for anything. They are a group of people incapable of introspection as this situation proves.
http://www.dailyslave.com/lol-israel...clear-weapons/
 
Old July 30th, 2015 #31
polnick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
Blog Entries: 18
polnick
Default

Poor whites get a hard time getting freebies, while the average street wise black momma pulls in on an average of 43 thousand in benefits. Only the Hassid Jewess can compete with the black momma, she can bring in the same plus a free Hebrew education for her Yiddles. The problem poor whites face applying for benefits is there is always a black supplying the freebies. After being forced to return many times to get the required documents the poor white usually gives up and try's street begging to survive.
 
Old September 7th, 2015 #32
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Baby killing jew leader of israel Benjamin Netanyahu refers to Syrians as migrants in english and infiltrators in hebrew

Quote:
The baby killing Jew leader of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu has been caught referring to Syrians as migrants in English and infiltrators in Hebrew.

This once again shows how these Jews articulate different messages to their own people and to the outside world.


http://www.pmo.gov.il/MediaCenter/Sp...art060915.aspx
The original Hebrew version of the statement, available on the Prime Minister’s Office website, refers to Syrian refugees as “infiltrators.” Mind you, none of the refugees have entered Israel, legally or illegally, so it’s not quiet clear how they could be infiltrators.
In a later paragraph, the whitewashing of Netanyahu’s unfortunate semantic choice goes even further. The Hebrew version quotes Netanyahu as saying (my translation): “We won’t allow Israel to be flooded with infiltrators, work migrants and terrorists.”



http://972mag.com/in-english-bibi-ca...rators/111448/

The English version entirely omits “infiltrators.” It quotes Netanyahu as saying: “We will not allow Israel to be flooded with illegal migrants and terrorists.”
The message here is clear. In Hebrew there is no such thing as a Syrian refugee who might find shelter in Israel; instead, there are infiltrators, work migrants and terrorists. All of those words are meant to scare the average Israeli into rejecting the possibility of taking in refugees.

http://www.dailyslave.com/baby-killi...ors-in-hebrew/
 
Old September 12th, 2015 #33
polnick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
Blog Entries: 18
polnick
Default

Low level Jews are not interested in anything but paying their bills.Concern for Israel is almost non existent among secular American Jews. The security of themselves is their main concern. But there are bogus groups claiming to represent American Jews asking for US aid for Israel. They only represent Israel.
 
Old September 16th, 2015 #34
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default

 
Old September 16th, 2015 #35
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Iran Has 0 Nukes While Israel’s 80 Nuclear Weapons Are Real Threat To Peace

Quote:
By Kit O'Connell @KitOConnell | August 21, 2015


JERUSALEM — While the Iran deal is often touted as the only possible solution to prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the Middle East, both U.S. and Israeli intelligence reports suggest that country never intended to build a nuclear weapon.

Meanwhile, Israel, one of its regional neighbors, possesses not only 80 functioning nuclear warheads but also the capability to use them.
Israel’s nuclear weapons program probably dates back to the 1950s, when U.S. surveillance flights first detected suspicious activity, according to a report from Bruce Riedel, a columnist with Al-Monitor, a news site offering analysis of events in the Middle East.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/...lear-arms-race

“President John F. Kennedy pressed Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion very hard not to proceed with a weapons program, arguing it would precipitate a regional nuclear arms race,” noted Riedel. “Under pressure from Kennedy, Israel agreed to American inspections of its French-supplied Dimona reactor, but then systematically blocked any serious inspection process.”

By the time Nixon became President, the United States moved from objecting to Israel’s nuclear weapons to protecting the program. Israel never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and, as Matt Peppe noted on MyMPN, the MintPress News blog, the U.S. helped Israel block efforts by the U.N. to prevent nuclear conflict in the Middle East.
http://www.mintpressnews.com/MyMPN/u...dle-east/1772/
There was ample evidence in 2013 to allow the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), a nonprofit devoted to preventing the proliferation and use of nuclear weapons technologies, to declare that Israel has at least 80 nuclear warheads.
http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/israe...eapons-report/
Using Defense Department sources, NTI estimates that Israel possessed enough material to create as many as 190 warheads, but halted construction prior to reaching that number.

Although the Israeli government formally refuses to comment on the existence of its nuclear weapons program, it’s become a rarely acknowledged “open secret,” as Julian Borger noted last year in the Guardian.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...uclear-arsenal

In late 2013, a former speaker of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, shockingly admitted to the program’s existence, leading to calls by Israeli conservatives that he be tried for treason. Western governments, Borger added, also uphold this air of secrecy:

“In 2009, when a veteran Washington reporter, Helen Thomas, asked Barack Obama in the first month of his presidency if he knew of any country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons, he dodged the trapdoor by saying only that he did not wish to ‘speculate.’

UK governments have generally followed suit. Asked in the House of Lords in November about Israeli nuclear weapons, Baroness Warsi answered tangentially. ‘Israel has not declared a nuclear weapons programme.’”

According to Riedel, Israel not only possesses dozens of nuclear warheads, but also three separate methods of delivering those weapons to a target. F-15 and F-16 fighter jets, supplied by the U.S. military, “can deliver nuclear weapons anywhere in the Middle East,” adding that “The Israeli air force has a well-deserved reputation as the best air force in the region with the best pilots.”

Riedel reported that Israel can also deliver Nuclear weapons through the “Jericho” midrange missile system, developed by France, and using cruise-missiles on German-built submarines.

Borger, in his report to The Guardian, highlighted the hypocrisy of so many countries supposedly dedicated to nuclear nonproliferation:

“The list of nations that secretly sold Israel the material and expertise to make nuclear warheads, or who turned a blind eye to its theft, include today’s staunchest campaigners against proliferation: the US, France, Germany, Britain and even Norway.”
http://www.mintpressnews.com/iran-ha...-peace/208815/
 
Old September 17th, 2015 #36
polnick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
Blog Entries: 18
polnick
Default

There was never an ability of Israel to create a nuke. They were given them by bribery. Suitcases full of hundreds dollar bills could even get a politician to hand over their wife. Storage of the nukes seems impossible without being detected. But mini nukes can be kept in the Vatican vaults until needed.
 
Old September 17th, 2015 #37
polnick
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 192
Blog Entries: 18
polnick
jewsign Jews Shave And Bathe Daily.

Orthodox Jews represent only 10% of the Jewish people. It is a misrepresentation depicting faces with ugly curls coming down the side of their faces as normal Jews. Most Jews shave and bathe daily before wearing expensive designer clothes. They wear cologne purchased in Macys or Bloomindale for 100 bucks. They are not seen in Synagogues but at fine restaurants and trendy night clubs. Most earn over 200 thousand yearly as lawyers and stock brokers.
 
Old September 18th, 2015 #38
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Jew -controlled west helps defeat proposal to inspect Israeli nuclear reactor

Quote:
This is really something else. A huge deal is made out of Iran’s nuclear energy program and how it needs to be subjected to numerous inspections.

Yet when it comes to a proposal for the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect an Israeli nuclear reactor, the West does everything they can to block it.

This is more proof that the West is controlled by a bunch of evil hypocritical Jews. They must be dealt with. All Jews must be removed from any position of power and banned from White European countries.



http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...701452,00.html


In a 61-43 vote, the Inernational Atomic Energy Agency General Assembly on Thursday defeated a proposal submitted by Egypt and supported by Syria, Iran, Libya, and Iraq to force inspections on Israel’s nuclear reactor in Dimona.

Israel had been working closely with the US and other Western allies behind the scenes in order to reach a majority that would block the proposal.

Israel has managed to block similar proposals in recent years, saying their purpose was mainly to single out Israel. But this was the first time the proposal was made in the context of the nuclear deal with Iran.
http://www.infostormer.com/jew-contr...clear-reactor/
 
Old January 1st, 2016 #39
Roger Bannon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 838
Roger Bannon
Default

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...eli-curriculum

Quote:
A novel about a love affair between a Jewish woman and a Palestinian man has been barred from Israel’s high school curriculum, reportedly over concerns that it could encourage intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews.
 
Old June 8th, 2016 #40
littlefieldjohn
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,048
littlefieldjohn
Default Jewish Lobby Mum on Israeli Segregation

Quote:
In Israel, Jews are so segregated from Arabs that most even live in separate towns—but the Jewish lobby in America and Europe, who are always the first to condemn any form of racial segregation involving white people, are completely silent on their own country’s policies.

News sources meant only for Jews are quite open about the fact of segregation in Israel. For example, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA)—one of the largest and oldest international Jewish news sources—has recently published a boastful article showing how Jews are segregated from Arabs in “four major areas” of Israeli life.




Titled “4 ways Jews and Arabs live apart in Israeli society,” the JTA starts off its review by discussing the recent “uproar”—in Israel only—concerning the admission that hospitals are racially segregated in Israel.

The JTA then asserts that this is not the only area in which Jews are segregated from Arabs in Israel.


“Jews and Arabs attend separate schools,” the JTA boldly asserts as a matter of fact, before explaining how this works:

Israel’s schools are separated by both religion and race.

Jewish students attend either[sic] secular, religious, or haredi Orthodox schools, while the Arabs attend separate Muslim, Christian, and Druze systems taught in Arabic.

The split education system does, the JTA says matter-of-factly, lead to “lower educational achievement among Arab Israelis.”

This means, the JTA continues, that on average two-thirds of “non-haredi Jews” (that is, non-orthodox Jews) qualify for university, as opposed to less than half of Arab students.

This also means that Israel’s universities have very low numbers of Arabs: in 2012, Arabs made up only 12 percent of bachelor’s degree students, and 4 percent of doctoral students.

he next segregation measure claimed by the JTA is even more dramatic, stating quite simply that “Jews and Arabs live in separate towns.”

Israeli Jews and Arabs mostly live in separate cities.

Two of the country’s largest cities, Jerusalem and Haifa, have substantial Arab populations, but even those cities are often separated by neighborhood.

Nearly all of Jerusalem’s Arab residents live in the eastern half of the city.

The JTA goes on to reveal that

Aside from a handful of other mixed Israeli towns, most of the country’s cities are more than 90 percent Jewish or Arab. Though Arabs make up nearly 20 percent of Israel’s citizenry, the Tel Aviv metropolitan area, Israel’s largest, is nearly 95 percent Jewish.

There are also massive disparities in public services and economy, the JTA article continues.

Arab cities have higher poverty rates and, in general, worse municipal services than their Jewish counterparts. Eight of Israel’s 10 poorest towns are Arab. The richest 30 are Jewish.

The third place of segregation, the JTA reveals, is in politics, saying that the Jewish and Arab “political leaders rarely work together.”

The JTA says that:

Israel often points to its Arab-Israeli lawmakers as proof of the country’s democratic chops.

But Israeli Arabs’ political leadership perpetually sits in the Knesset’s opposition, and few politicians in the government are Arab, such that the two communities’ agendas rarely align. The only Arab in Israel’s political leadership is the deputy minister of regional cooperation, Ayoub Kara, who is part of the Druze [Christian] minority.

Fourthly, the JTA asserts, “Arabs are barely present in Israel’s mainstream media.”


Israeli Arabs have their own active press, but they are vastly underrepresented in mainstream Israeli media, comprising fewer than 3 percent of total interviews on leading Israel stations in January and February this year alone, the JTA says.

The number drops even lower when it comes to news segments not directly related to Israeli Arabs. Aharish’s Channel 2, for example, spoke to only 11 Arabs out of more than 5,500 total such interviews in January.

In America, the Anti-Defamation League—which fanatically supports Israel—is one of the leading campaigners against any form of segregation involving white people.

For example, in June 2015, the ADL issued a statement “applauding” a US Supreme Court decision enforcing the “Fair Housing Act” *even when the impact of a neutral policy is discriminatory
.



*This means that any local authority is liable to prosecution if racial segregation occurs in its jurisdiction—even if there was not active intent to segregate, or where it “happened naturally.”

Christopher Wolf, ADL Civil Rights Chair, said in a statement that the “Fair Housing Act is an essential tool to eradicate housing discrimination and promote more inclusive neighborhoods. This decision recognizes the realities of discrimination. Intentional or not, discrimination hurts people and damages the fabric of our society.”

Obviously, Wolf and the ADL have a different set of standards for their own country, Israel—where they not only segregate suburbs, but entire towns.

According to the Jewish lobby therefore, discrimination in Israel is fine, and must be supported to “protect Jewish identity,” but any white person using this identical argument is an “evil racist” who is “damaging the fabric of society.”

Once again, the message is clear: there is one rule for Jews, and another completely different rule for non-Jews.
http://newobserveronline.com/jewish-...i-segregation/
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:11 PM.
Page generated in 0.18480 seconds.