|December 19th, 2008||#1|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Jews Hate, Lie About and Attack Non-Jews
I need not write anything here as the picture speaks a thousand words .
|August 9th, 2009||#3|
Join Date: Jul 2006
...one jewish fingernail
A poster for a campaign launched yesterday by the Binyamin Citizen’s Committee protests American pressure to freeze settlement construction.
|November 6th, 2009||#4|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
|July 17th, 2012||#5|
[perfectly captures the hate jews carry for gentiles, be they arabs or aryans]
click on photo to enlarge to truly appreciate the vicious hatefulness of these jews abusing an old woman whose house they are stealing
Settlers [sic] make fun of the Palestinian woman after the occupation authorities force her out of her home in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in Jerusalem.
|July 17th, 2012||#6|
Join Date: Apr 2004
I like this comment:
There's another thread with comments on the pic here: http://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/wpcfx/irony/
Though the atheism section is the most leftist part of the site, I've found.
Still, gotta love how the world is growing to hate Israel more and more.
I usually browse these un-P.C. sections http://www.reddit.com/r/niggers+shhh...falseflagwatch
|August 1st, 2012||#7|
[jew defame their enemies on Wikipedia, which purports to be a neutral resource]
January 6, 2010 (Wednesday)
Wikipedia editors respond to Holzel furious about his description of them as "a cabal of religious zealots":
You have again described the editors of this article as "a cabal of religious zealots". First, when BBC News ("Holocaust denier to be released") and The Guardian ("Holocaust denier Irving freed early from prison") refer to Irving as a "Holocaust denier", is that because they're also part of that "cabal of religious zealots"? Are they also committing a "terrorist act"? Was Justice Gray also part of that "cabal of religious zealots"? Did he also commit a "terrorist act"? Second, I strongly urge you to re-factor your comments, and remove all reference to Wikipedia editors. WP:CIVIL is no joke, learn to communicate civilly. Jayjg (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC) If I might cut in here, our biggest problem in maintaining neutrality is the overuse of quotations. I would much rather see editorialising than a he said/she said approach to writing about historical debates. Please get clear consensus (at least ten editors in favour) to add any quotes, no matter how authoritative the source may be. Ottre 04:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Now at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_attacks_on_Jews_by_User:Tholzel. -- Peter Cohen (talk) 10:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Holzel to editors: Well, I give up. I can see that no matter how many historians you allow yourself to use in the article to say the Irving is not an historian, me adding a single highly respected counter-argument is not going to be permitted. The only complaint you didn't use is that my exculpatory evidence is "unbalanced." And the way you dwell on secondary complaints, centered not on the issue but on my uncivility in order not to reply to the crux of the issue -- well it shows that you are really expert at your job: Master Propagandist cruising under the false colors of a disinterested editor. I hope it pays well.Tholzel (talk) 14:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
[[The newspapers they mention and the BBC have long stopped calling me a Holocaust denier because of the legal risks.]]
"Repeated attacks on Jews"?? Is that what you guys call my disagreeing with the "editors" of this anti-Irving diatribe? Why didn't you say you were Jewish? Then I would have understood why you are totally unable to present Irving's biography in a neutral, disinterested manner.Tholzel (talk) 20:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Holzel's response to the Wikipedia panel:
I will gladly answer these questions, but I must say, your answer takes my breath away.
1) This is not an encyclopedia article. It is text proofing taken to a high art. Every point made by the "article" is there to denigrate -- not describe -- an historian of considerable merit in his field. After using 5,300 words of ten historians criticizing Irving's professionalism, I try to add a single paragraph by Justice Gray (whom you quote liberally when it suits you) to give counter evidence that essentially negates much of these complaints against Irving -- and you find that single 211 word paragraph by this expert too long???
2) This article is a professional hatchet job because it has been produced not by an amalgam of contributors as Wiki contributions are supposed to be created, but by a cabal of religious zealots whose entire interest is to besmirch David Irving. Wiki contributors are specifically told not to contribute if they mind being challenged and contradicted. But there is no warning that certain sites like this one are off-limits to contributors, and which is watched over by a secret priesthood that has taken over complete control of the entire article. Not kosher!
Further evidence of its professional single-source construction can be gleaned by comparing it to a similar article, the one on "Holocaust denial." Here we find the exact same construction -- liberal quotes by experts, a lengthy footnote list, references, etc., etc. A really professional job, and by such coincidence, exactly of the same ilk as the Irving article.
3) You continually come back to the same uncivil tactic: "Are you saying (insert something I did not say into my mouth) because if you did (insert threat)?" How can we discuss Irving if everything anyone says who disagrees with you is uncivil, and only what you say, is permissible. It is looming censorship of the worst type.
4) Now that I have answered your questions, perhaps you will ask the question that you have coolly dodged for several days now: What is Holocaust denial? If you cannot even answer that -- and you have used the usual tricks to not do so -- not relevant, see another 10,000 word article we wrote -- how can you claim Irving is one? Most of the claims in the article are innuendo, a mish-mash of alleged anti-Semitism (is anti-Semitism Holocaust denial?), and massive guilt by association (it is unbelievable how many Nazi portraits grace a biography of this Englishman). Of course you get away with this because you never say what Holocaust denial is. Or put another way, it's whatever you say it is, plus whatever critics you've lined up say it is.
It is not an answer to say he lost at a trial. It is not an answer to say he sued and not the other way around, as if being accused of being a Holocaust denier was in the same league as being called daft. Holocaust denial is a crime in many countries, so calling Irving one -- without having to say what that means -- is a terrorist act. If I were to call you a child molester, I suspect you would sue me. Then you would be doing the suing, just as Irving had to do the suing, to try to clear his name.
So I believe you are absolutely wrong in refusing to allow that short quotation by Justice Gray in the article. I find it utterly incomprehensible that you can blithely brush-off this insertion of trenchant counter evidence by a neutral authority just because his expert testimony happens to negate much of what your article tries to put over on the public. That is exactly what Wikipedia is supposed to allow.
I have replied to Holzel:
I sympathise with them but only up to a point. The quote [from Mr Justice Gray's Judgment] was meant to clarify one issue, namely the oft repeated argument that "David Irving is not an historian." You over-egged the cake. Their highly paid ($500,000) professional expert Professor Richard Evans stated so explicitly in his evidence. On this point he was emphatically contradicted by the Judgment. Hence the importance of the quote. Also: the Judge found that Lipstadt did lie about me on important matters (Hitler painting, Hizbollah ties, Goebbels microfiches). Try again!
February 8, 2010 (Monday)
Holzel has this morning sent me an update on his struggle to get Wikipedia to balance their entry on me properly:
WELL, as you can imagine, you are right -- I was completely and professionally rebuffed by the cabal of ideological zealots who run Wikipedia. NOTHING I could suggest was considered acceptable. When I pointed out that 80% of the commentary about you was negative and 4% positive compared to 34% negative for the bio of Josef Stalin, this was considered irrelevant and certainly no sign of bias.
I was duly banned for "Repeated attack on Jews," even though the complaint in the discussion section was that I was attacking the editors. And, that I had no idea of the religion of the editors. How I could be guilty of attacking Jews if they were not Jewish was never made clear.
The entire sorry tale is available for viewing at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Da...ting_this_page
It is a masterpiece of dissimulation. But, subsequent inquiries about whether I could make a case against the editors made me realize that the organization has been taken over by Talmudic scholars who will always find fault with your argument, and are blind to their own faults.
Any way, I enjoyed the battle for the sake of freedom of speech. I was foolish to think that this modern innovation would have any effect on an entrenched, ancient prior philosophy.
Last edited by Alex Linder; August 1st, 2012 at 09:06 PM.
|May 7th, 2013||#8|
Join Date: May 2009
“I Will Kill Frick”: Emma Goldman Recounts the Attempt to Assassinate the Chairman of the Carnegie Steel Company
|July 15th, 2014||#9|
Duckfaces and Death to Arabs: Israeli Teens Call for Ethnic Cleansing
|August 22nd, 2014||#10|
how kikes troll the internet to destroy jew- or israel-critical writers and websites
|August 22nd, 2014||#11|
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
|August 24th, 2014||#12|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Fake Negro on VNN?
|August 25th, 2014||#13|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Kikesville, Hymietown
No jews, no problems.
Never trust a jew.
|August 27th, 2014||#14|
Join Date: Sep 2013
Where is Deshawn?
|October 18th, 2014||#15|
Join Date: May 2009
|November 23rd, 2014||#16|
Join Date: Jul 2014
N.J. rabbi: Arabs in Israel ‘must be vanquished’
By Ben SalesNovember 23, 2014 9:25am
The rabbi of a major modern Orthodox synagogue in New Jersey has written a blog post that calls for Israel to collectively punish Arab Israelis and Palestinians until they realize “they have no future in the land of Israel.”
In the post, written Friday and titled “Dealing with Savages,” Rabbi Steven Pruzansky of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun in Teaneck offers suggestions that range from destroying whole Palestinian towns to uprooting the Dome of the Rock.
“There is a war for the land of Israel that is being waged, and the Arabs who dwell in the land of Israel are the enemy in that war and must be vanquished,” Pruzansky writes.
The post has since been deleted, but it’s cached here.
Pruzansky refers to “the Arab-Muslim animals that span the globe chopping, hacking and merrily decapitating,” and then writes, “At a certain point, the unrestrained behavior of unruly animals becomes the fault of the zookeeper, not the animals.”
So what should Israel do? According to Pruzansky, essentially end civil and human rights for many Arab Israelis and Palestinians. Beyond killing all terrorists and demolishing their extended families’ homes, Pruzansky says Israel should destroy entire Arab villages if more than one terrorist comes from them. All the residents of those villages, he writes, should be expelled.
He also writes that rioters and stone-throwers should be shot with live ammunition, and that reporters should be barred from these scenes and have their cameras confiscated.
Pruzansky says Arabs should be barred from the Temple Mount for at least six months, and muses that “perhaps the day will come in the near future when the mosque and the dome can be uplifted intact and reset in Saudi Arabia, Syria or wherever it is wanted.”
Pruzansky writes that Palestinians and Arab Israelis as a whole are Israel’s enemy — “and that enemy rides our buses, shops in our malls, drives on our roads and lives just two miles from us.” (“Us” apparently doesn’t include Pruzansky himself, who leads a congregation 5,000 miles from Jerusalem.)
This isn’t the first time Pruzansky has made the news for his views. Earlier this month, he compared The New York Jewish Week to Der Sturmer, a Nazi newspaper. Pruzansky’s congregation, Bnai Yeshurun, has about 800 member families, according to its website, and has been led by Pruzansky for more than 20 years.
Near the end of his post, Pruzansky wonders why Israelis haven’t come to the same conclusions he has. It’s an “enduring enigma,” he says.
Israelis across the political spectrum support safeguarding the state’s democratic character. Most have consistently backed a Palestinian state. But it bears noting that almost all of those who oppose Palestinian statehood still don’t speak anything close to Pruzansky’s language.
A telling example: Naftali Bennett, who leads the furthest-right party in Knesset and strongly opposes a Palestinian state, came out quickly and vehemently last week against an Israeli city’s ban on Arab construction workers. “99.9 percent” are nonviolent, he said, and Israel should not discriminate based on race or religion.
|November 24th, 2014||#18|
Hellstorm: The Devil’s Cauldron
November 15, 2014 Ar
Two million German women were savagely raped and tortured at the tail end of WWII. No one has yet apologized for these horrific war crimes. Why not?
about to die“In the German race there is nothing but evil. Use force and break the racial pride of these German women.Take them as your lawful booty. Kill!”
— Ilya Ehrenberg, Jewish propagandist for the Stalin regime
This 6000-word article consists of two parts. Part 1, by Lasha Darkmoon, sets the scene and provides many factual details about rape atrocities against German women by Allied soldiers in the 1944-1947 period. Part 2, by JA Sexton, is a review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947). This brings to life in vivid detail all the horrors defeated Germany had to go through at the hands of the victorious Allies.
If you have a delicate constitution and want to protect your mind from images of extreme terror, images bordering on the grotesquely obscene, please read no further. If, on the other hand, you have an appetite for the gruesome truth and wish to take a peek into the Devil’s cauldron, then by all means read on.
Part 1: The Devil’s Cauldron
by Lasha Darkmoon
RED ARMY RAPISTS (Artist unknown)RED ARMY RAPISTS
One German woman came to her priest and broke down in tears. “Father, I can’t go on living! Thirty of them raped me last night.” (Goodrich, p.158).The German clergy were only too aware of the rape and mass murder of Catholic nuns, many of them bedridden geriatric women. One of these priests writes in his diary:
“The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims.
During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times.The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles.
The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians. (Ibid. p.84)
The Americans and the Brits knew all these atrocities were going on but did nothing to stop them. They stood by and saw it all happening, cruel accomplices to crime. Indeed, many of them joined in the bloodbath of sadistic sexuality: Americans, Brits, French, and French Moroccans in particular.
“Staggered by what he had seen and heard, a German officer tried desperately to make sense of the disaster; to understand the minds of men ‘who find . . . pleasure in raping the same woman over and over, dozens of times, even while other women are standing near.’” (Ibid. p.93)
Inflicting savage sex wounds on German women, including their children in the presence of their parents, was one the perks of war for these coldhearted killers. “Our fellows were so sex-starved,” a Soviet major told a British journalist at the time, “that they often raped old women of sixty, seventy or even eighty — much to these grandmothers’ surprise, if not downright delight.”
This cynical throwaway comment is indicative of the surreal atmosphere of war fever that possessed so many otherwise sane and well-balanced people at that time: the bizarre idea that an 80-year-old German grandmother should actually be flattered and pleased to be raped.
Several German women recorded how even Soviet servicewomen watched and laughed while they were being gang-raped.
While the idea that the Russians were largely to blame for this orgy of mass rape cannot be denied, the overall picture is more nuanced. “There were Russian freebooters who drank and raped quite shamelessly,” British historian Anthony Beevor tells us, “but there were also idealistic, austere communists and members of the Russian intelligentsia who were appalled by such behaviour.”
“Beria and Stalin, back in Moscow, knew perfectly well what was going on from a number of detailed reports….Marshal Rokossovsky issued order No 006 in an attempt to direct “the feelings of hatred at fighting the enemy on the battlefield.” It appears to have had little effect. The commander of one rifle division is said to have “personally shot a lieutenant who was lining up a group of his men before a German woman spreadeagled on the ground”. But either officers were involved themselves, or the lack of discipline made it too dangerous to restore order over drunken soldiers armed with submachine guns.” — Historian Anthony Beevor, acclaimed author of “Berlin: The Downfall 1945.”
Drink of every variety, Beevor discloses, including dangerous chemicals seized from laboratories and workshops, was a major factor in the violence.
“It seems as if Soviet soldiers needed alcoholic courage to attack a woman. But then, all too often, they drank too much and, unable to complete the act, used the bottle instead with appalling effect. A number of victims were mutilated obscenely.”
According to Beevor, estimates of rape victims from Berlin’s two main hospitals ranged from 95,000 to 130,000. One doctor calculated that out of approximately 100,000 women raped in Berlin, roughly 10,000 died as a result. Mostly from suicide. The death rate was thought to have been much higher among the 1.4 million estimated victims in East Prussia, Pomerania and Silesia. “Altogether at least two million German women are thought to have been raped,” Beevor concludes, “and a substantial minority, if not a majority, appear to have suffered multiple rape.” (See here)
Note that we are talking about 2 million different women being raped, not about two million rapes. Given that women were often raped several times a day—sometimes 60-70 times according to one authority—the total number of rapes could well have numbered over 20 million.
Since the Red Army included a substantial number of Jews in it, many in supervisory positions, there appears to have been an unwritten rule that Jewish women should be exempt from rape. After all, the Bolshevik regime whose forces were carrying out most of these rapes was known to be an essentially Jewish regime, with the cheka or secret police and other top government functionaries being predominantly Jewish. There is a curious account, however, of one German Jewess being raped by Soviet troops. When this was pointed out to the rapists as some kind of anomaly — “Hey, don’t rape her, she’s Jewish!” — the brutalized soldiers are reported to have sneered, “So what? A woman is a woman. Frau ist Frau.”
Here are some relevant facts which the reader might wish to bear in mind when reading JA Sexton’s chilling review of Goodrich’s Hellstorm that follows in Part 2 of this article:
These acts of sexual violence against German women, described by Beevor as “the greatest phenomenon of mass rape in history,” took place mostly in 1944-1945 as the Western Allies and the Red Army fought their way into the Third Reich. They began in October 1944 and reached their climax in 1945, continuing until the winter of 1947-1948.
Of the 2 million German women who were raped, an estimated 240,000 died in the process after sustaining multiple wounds and being gang-raped several times—sometimes as many as 100 times in a single day. A large number of these women are said to have committed suicide.
Stalin knew that these rapes were going on and that the reputation of the Red Army and the Soviet Union was suffering as a consequence. There was a notable difference between the official Soviet attitude to these rapes—one of severe disapproval and condemnation—and Stalin’s own laissez-faire attitude which reflected the view of many around him, especially the Jews in his entourage who hated the Germans with an unquenchable hatred.
Remember that it was Ilya Ehrenberg, Stalin’s Jewish Red Army propagandist, who had authored and signed several leaflets urging Soviet troops to kill the Germans without mercy and to take German women as their “lawful booty.”
In January 1945 Stalin signed an order criminalizing Red Army misconduct. It stated that civilians “should not be subjected to violence. The perpetrators will be punished. In liberated territories, sexual relations with females are not allowed. Perpetrators of violence will be shot.”
These regulations however were seldom applied with any degree of stringency. Leniency, laissez-faire and connivance were the rule rather than the exception—exactly as in Israel today where the IDF and Jewish settlers break Israeli law with impunity and are seldom punished for their crimes of violence against the Palestinians.
Nothing changes in this respect. The law says, Thou Shalt Not. But the state-backed criminal does what he pleases.
Stalin’s easygoing attitude to the mass rape and murder of German women was revealed in an unofficial, off-the-cuff comment he made to Yugoslav politician Milovan Djilas who had complained to him about Red Army rapes in Yugoslavia.
“Understand it ,” Stalin is reported to have said cynically, “that if a soldier who has crossed thousands of kilometres through blood and fire and death has fun with a woman or takes some trifle.” On another occasion, when told that Red Army soldiers had sexually maltreated some German women, he said dismissively: “We lecture our soldiers too much; let them have their initiative.”
Boys will be boys. Let the lads have their fun.
According to Oleg Rzheshevsky, a professor and President of the Russian Association of World War II Historians, 4,148 Red Army officers and soldiers had been convicted of atrocities. He explained that plunder and rapine were an inevitable part of war and that other Allied forces committed such crimes too, not just the Soviets. On the whole, he believed Soviet servicemen had been well-behaved and treated the German enemy in a humane and civilized manner.
The German woman who had been raped sixty times in a single day clearly would not have agreed with this rosy picture of Russian civility.
This claim of exemplary behavior by “most” Soviets soldiers later became the refrain among Soviet commentators, too traumatized with guilt and shame to be able to admit what their own people had done. Russian soldiers were credited with “feeding the German population, rescuing children, and helping to restore normal life in the country.” In many cases this was true. Not all Russians were brutes. Many were indeed kind and decent, noble and self-restrained, deeply impregnated with the Christian values of the great race that had given the world Tolstoy and Dostoevsky.
Indeed one Russian official, Makhmut Gareev, said that “he had not even heard about any sexual violence.” (See here)
The number of rapes committed by US servicemen in Germany are officially estimated at 11,040. Many of these were gang rapes committed by armed American soldiers at gunpoint. The journalist Osmar White, a war correspondent from Australia who served with American troops during the war, writes:
“I know for a fact that many women were raped by White Americans. No action was taken against the culprits. A typical victimization with sexual assault by drunken American personnel marching through occupied territory involved threatening a German family with weapons, forcing one or more women to engage in sex, and putting the entire family out on the street afterward.”
In May-June 1946, no fewer than five dead German women were found in American barracks. Maybe they were being kept as trophies or for continued use after death. Blood-spattered sex dolls. We’ll never know. Punishment was sporadically meted out to American rapists, the maximum severity being reserved for black American soldiers by their white racist officers. Some onehad to be singled out for punishment, after all, so why not Jim Crow? (Seehere)
British troops were also guilty of raping German women. On a single day in mid-April 1945, three German women were raped by British soldiers in Neustadt. A senior British army chaplain was quite matter-of-fact about British participation in rape. “A good deal of rape is going on,” he admitted, adding somewhat callously: “The women probably deserved it.”
Let us see what these German women “deserved”. Here are a few grisly quotes from Hellstorm which you will not find in Sexton’s book review below, though you will find other quotes there that are equally horrifying.
“Of all the methods used to express its anger, the Red Army said it best with rape. From eight to eighty, healthy or ill, indoors or out, in fields, on sidewalks, against walls, the spiritual massacre of German women continued unabated. (p.155)
The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. (p. 159)
When even violated corpses could no longer be of use, sticks, iron bars and telephone receivers were rammed up their vaginas. (p. 155)
The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women. (p.79)
“Those women who were pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist.
Even death was no defense.
‘I saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,’ one sickened witness recorded. ‘They were shouting and laughing and WAITING FOR THEIR SATISFACTION OVER HER DEAD BODY.’” (Emphasis added, p.84)
The haunting book review that follows in Part 2 will take you to hell and back. Prepare for a roller coaster ride into a landscape of terror that neither Dante in his Inferno nor Hieronymus Bosch in his maddest paintings could ever have imagined.
Part 2: Into the Inferno,
by JA Sexton
A review of Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany (1944-1947),
1What is hell?
I’ve often pondered what the concept “hell” entailed; what it means to be living in the absence of “God,” the supreme creative force behind all life. After reading Thomas Goodrich’s breathtaking and physically nauseating analytical narrative of the burnt offering – Holocaust – of Germany I now know what hell looks like and how its inhabitants live and behave.
Relentless, reckless, and senseless hate of a magnitude so profound, so immense, that I am still unable to understand it. And then the irony of it all: that former inhabitants of Europe – Europeans – were responsible for inculcating hell in their own Heimat (homeland).
Who but the Devil itself could make a family turn on itself, causing it to tear itself apart in such a murderous, inhuman fashion that the victims are left unrecognizable after all the torture, abuse, burning, systematic rape, and beatings subsides?
Who or what could inspire such madness? Thomas Goodrich answers this question silently, subtly, but matter-of-factly : the Jews in Communist Russia (the former USSR) were to blame — and so, too, were the Jews of Capitalist America and Britain.
Hellstorm is the type of book that changes lives. Goodrich is the type of author who literally puts you, the reader, there in the midst of hell. And what is this hell that he forces you to experience page after page, torture after torture, and rape after rape? One that has been all but forgotten; the only hell the modern age really knows.
The Allied Holocaust of National Socialist Germany
Goodrich describes the Allied-induced inferno in more detail than most need to know to gain an understanding of the depths of Allied criminality and hatred, but the detail is necessary. Without the detail no one will really know what hell is like. Here’s a taste of it.
A German woman has her jaws forced open by the filthy brutish hands of a Soviet serial rapist. He literally spits into her mouth and forces her to swallow his salivary filth as he rams her body again . . . and again . . . and again – until he’s satisfied fulfilling his oath to Stalin and his chief Holocaust propagandist, Ilya Ehrenburg.
Stalin officially sanctioned the systematic rape of German women. Ilya Ehrenburg, for his part as the lascivious advocator of rape of German women, helped the Red Army perpetrate the largest gynocide and mass rape in recorded history.
Commissar Ehrenburg’s pamphlet urged Soviet troops to plunder, rape and KILL. This pamphlet was distributed in the millions among Red Army troops on the front lines of battle — men who were already intoxicated with hate and vengefulness as a result of over two decades of Bolshevik oppression: the collectivization of their farms, the confiscation of their grain and property, and the mass murder of their families.
Here are the final paragraphs of Ilya Ehrenberg’s pamphlet entitled “Kill”:
“The Germans are not human beings. From now on, the word ‘German’ is the most horrible curse. From now on, the word ‘German’ strikes us to the quick. We have nothing to discuss. We will not get excited. We will kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day.
If you cannot kill a German with a bullet, then kill him with your bayonet. If your part of the front is quiet and there is no fighting, then kill a German in the meantime. If you have already killed a German, then kill another one — there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.
Don’t count the days, don’t count the kilometers. Count only one thing: the number of Germans you have killed.
Kill the Germans!… Kill the Germans!…Kill!”
And in another leaflet, this is what the same psychopath has to say:
“The Germans must be killed. One must kill them….Do you feel sick? Do you feel a nightmare in your breast?…Kill a German! If you are a righteous and conscientious man, kill a German!. . . Kill!”
Ehrenburg, like any skilled propagandist with a penchant for revenge and training in human psychology, appealed to the basest instincts of his men, urging them to rape and wantonly slaughter other human beings at will. There would be no penalties for this injustice. It was all officially sanctioned.
Here is Ehrenburg again, rising to new heights of mental derangement, this time giving Soviet troops the green light to rape and kill as many German women as they wanted:
“Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these German women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, KILL, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army!”
There is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of German corpses.”
— Ilya Ehrenberg
LASHA DARKMOON: Ilya Ehrenberg’s attitude to German women—that they should be treated as”lawful booty” by Soviet troops—is strikingly similar to the attitude attributed by Russian history professor Alexander Statiev to the average Soviet soldier: “Avenge! You are a soldier-Avenger! Kill the German, and then jump the German woman! This is how a soldier celebrates victory!” (See here)
Ilya Ehrenberg, directly responsible for the rape, torture and mass murder of 2 million German women after WWII, is now honored in Israel, his papers being lovingly preserved by the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum.
In his 6-volume memoirs, Ehrenberg openly boasts about being aware of the crimes of the Stalin regime, his own included, and actually admits that a veil of silence has been drawn over these matters.
He is buried in Moscow at the Novodevichy Cemetery where his tomb is graced with a crude, cartoonish portrait by his close friend Picasso. One cannot help wondering if the great Spanish painter was aware that his Jewish pal, who won the absurdly named “Stalin Peace Prize” in 1952, was a psychopath with a lot of blood on his hands.. (See here).
JA SEXTON (continues) : The thought of being burned alive is horrific, but the thought of being burned alive because you are trapped in melted asphalt and literally stuck by your own disfigured hands and knees and screaming is worse.
What did you do to be burned or boiled alive? What was your crime?
You supported Adolf Hitler, the man who dared to stand up to international finance and the Jewish system of systematic international monetary and spiritual enslavement.
THAT was your “crime” and the crime of millions of others in Germany and Europe who were incinerated, melted, tortured, strafed, raped or blown into body parts by their own racial and cultural kindred in the USSR, Britain and America.
The core of the firestorms often reached 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit; the flames 1,300 to 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. A Holocaust in the truest sense of the word: a burnt offering of the Germanic race – women, children, refugees, POWs, the elderly, and even animals at the Berlin Zoo – to the Christian-Jewish “god” Jahve. The truth is that this was the single largest burnt offering of human flesh to the Devil in recorded history. And for what? For what did hundreds of thousands of German victims suffer: international finance Capitalism.
And WHY? This is why: So that a few people, mostly ethnic Jews, could continue to make money from money and enslave millions of people in the process.
Eisenhower’s camps were designed with one purpose in mind: mass death. They were, quite literally, death camps.
Millions of German men and boys died from starvation, disease, exposure, heat exhaustion, thirst, and of course torture, slave labor, random massacre, and systematic execution.
After having served in the worst war in Western history, and one of the worst in world history, German men came “home” to nothing more than rubble. Their wives, girlfriends, and children were dead, enslaved, mutilated, driven to madness, missing, lost, or had gone with the enemy to survive and prevent further systematic rape by Polish, Russian, and Mongolian soldiers.
There were very few “homes” to return to, so thousands of men ended their lives in despair. They had survived six years of horror and warfare only to end it all in the rubble-strewn wasteland once called “Germany.”
Because their own blood kindred in America and Britain — and even in much of Europe — had betrayed them: had turned on them to appease their Jewish overlords.
An older German woman is approached by filthy Soviet soldiers. She knows what awaits her because Goebbels did not lie. She tries to talk them out it. She has children with her. They dispose of the children rapidly, viciously: their heads are rammed into the side of the building. The woman is gang-raped. What does she recall . . . the rape? No. The sound of a child’s skull when it is crushed against a wall. She’ll never forget that sound.
Nor will I because I too can hear it. I too witnessed it. I witnessed it through Goodrich.
PRESIDENT EISENHOWER: “God, how I hate the Germans!”PRESIDENT EISENHOWER:
“God, how I hate the Germans!”
And then there were the death campswhere over a million German men perished because Eisenhower (pictured)hated Germans: “God, how I hate the Germans,” he confided in a letter to his wife.
His racism and hate became official policy, a policy of genocide—an American orchestrated Holodomor. Countless thousands of German men were shipped off to Britain and Siberia to serve as slave laborers for the “victors”.
Victors of what? Total destruction.
While this horror is unfolding, Roosevelt (and later Truman) and Churchill cheerfully offer Stalin half of Europe. They are more than happy to accommodate nearly every demand drafted up by this “Man of Steel.” The result of these Anglo-Soviet arrangements nearly defies description:
The greatest mass expulsion and deportation in history (upwards of 13 million); the mass murder of millions of Germans and their allies in Russian, French, Jewish, and Polish retribution camps and prisons dotted all throughout Europe and the USSR; the systematic mass rape and murder of German and collaborator women (an estimated two million); and the deliberate secret starvation of the Germanic race as spelled out by the Jewish adviser to Roosevelt and Truman, Henry Morgenthau.
Between 20 and 25 million Germans and collaborators perished in the years AFTER the war had officially ended. It is a crime that will never be forgotten, and it is a crime that will forever stain the hands and national consciences of the former USSR, the United States of America, Great Britain and her Commonwealth nations, and perhaps more pointedly the Anglo and Slavic races of the White race.
A little German boy holds a lantern as he sits in a wagon en route to the Allied lines in the bitter winter snow. He’s with his mother. She’s bleeding profusely; she’s dying. The German doctor who the little boy was lucky enough to hunt down is doing his best to perform a tamponade (a blockage) of her uterus. She was brutally, viciously raped. Did she survive? Goodrich doesn’t say, but the prognosis and tone suggests she didn’t make it. She was a German. She supported Hitler. She was a Nazi. She deserved it.
She deserved it.
So said the Allies in the years following the war: Germany merely got what she deserved. The ‘morally superior’ White nations of the globe had smashed ultimate evil: the Nazis; the German race.
GERMAN CHILD VICTIM:
RAPED, TORTURED, AND LEFT TO DIE IN THE WOODS
GERMAN CHILDGERMAN CHILD
“She deserved it . . . because she was a Nazi!”
Never has a greater lie been told. Never has so much hatred and vengeance been poured forth onto one people and one nation that had chosen not to abide by the laws of international bankers and financiers who wish only to enslave, plunder, steal and when necessary, kill.
And most of the White races of the world were more than willing and eager to take up the flag of international Jewish money power and to smash the one White race that opposed it with such honor, valor and sheer might — so much so that it took all the best brain-power and material wealth of the entire White race, and all the monetary power of its Jewish financiers and overlords, to break its back.
I went into Goodrich’s book expecting to read little more than I already knew about the worst gynocide and mass rape of womankind in recorded history, but I was in for a shock. As an individual who looks out for women’s interests, I was repeatedly overcome with emotion while reading of the indescribable genital mutilations, deliberate and systematic terrorism, gang-rape and wanton mass murder of women.
Here is Brazilian German Leonora Cavoa who was an eyewitness to these sexual atrocities:
“Suddenly I heard loud screams, and immediately two Red Army soldiers brought in five girls.
The Commissar ordered them to undress. When they refused out of modesty, he ordered me to do it to them, and for all of us to follow him.
We crossed the yard to the former works kitchen, which had been completely cleared out except for a few tables on the window side. It was terribly cold, and the poor girls shivered. In the large, tiled room some Russians were waiting for us, making remarks that must have been very obscene, judging from how everything they said drew gales of laughter.
The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.
The horror that ensued nearly defies written description, as no written description can actually make a reader of either sex feel and genuinely know the pain and suffering inflicted in this never-ending horror show. The victims’ pain and suffering must have seemed like hours and hours . . . an entire lifetime . . . I can’t imagine. I try not to imagine it because about 2,000 women in the Nemmersdorf area alone suffered a similar fate.
Now two Poles came in, dressed only in their trousers, and the girls cried out at their sight. They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.
I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife and, before the very eyes of the other girls, cut off her right breast.
He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side.
I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl. After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen several times, which again was accompanied by the cheers of the Russians.”
"WE LECTURE OUR SOLDIERS TOO MUCH; LET THEM HAVE THEIR INITIATIVE." — Josef Stalin“WE LECTURE OUR SOLDIERS TOO MUCH;
LET THEM HAVE THEIR INITIATIVE.”
— Josef Stalin
Force yourself to see your own body mutilated in similar fashion; force yourself to picture a knife plunging into your abdomen again . . . and again . . . your short lifetime come to this end: you know you are about to die. You are being murdered; your body brutally tortured by a mob of brutal sadists. Try to imagine the horror and the helplessness you would feel as your person was mutilated and your very life bleeding away on a table.
Can a human being really suffer a worse injustice than this?
Now . . . step back out of the scene and analyze this needless, inhuman horror with the gift of hindsight. This victim was not just the victim of these Red Army men, reduced to base animal instinct and mentality, but she was also the victim of an ideology inspired by Judaism and a Jewish propagandist named Ilya Ehrenburg.
Brazilian eyewitness Leonora Cavoa again :
“The next girl cried for mercy, but in vain—it even seemed that the gruesome deed was done particularly slowly because she was especially pretty.
The other three had collapsed, they cried for their mothers and begged for a quick death, but the same fate awaited them as well.
The last of them was still almost a child, with barely developed breasts. They literally tore the flesh off her ribs until the white bones showed.
Loud howls of approval began when someone brought a saw from a tool chest. This was used to tear up the breasts of the other girls, which soon caused the floor to be awash in blood. The Russians were in a blood frenzy. More girls were being brought in continually.
I saw these grisly proceedings as through a red haze.
. . . Over and over again I heard the terrible screams when the breasts were tortured, and the loud groans at the mutilation of the genitals. . . . It was always the same, the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when the breasts were cut and the groans when the genitals were mutilated.
The slaughter was interrupted several times to sweep the blood out of the room and clear away the bodies. . . . When my knees buckled I was forced onto a chair. The Commissar always made sure that I was watching, and when I had to throw up they even paused in their tortures.
One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been a little older than the others, who were around seventeen years of age. They soaked her bra with oil and set it on fire, and while she screamed, a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina . . .
. . . until it came out of her navel.
In the yard entire groups of girls were clubbed to death after the prettiest of them had been selected for this torture. The air was filled with the death cries of many hundred girls” (pp. 156–57).
And this is where I have to stop transcribing . . .
“The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.”“The Commissar told me to watch and learn
how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.”
LASHA DARKMOON: It is a closely documented fact that most of the supervisory jobs among the Red Army Bolsheviks were held by Jews. The sadistic commissar mentioned above is therefore likely to have been Jewish.
As for the Red army rapists, we have a great deal of circumstantial evidence that the bulk of these may have belonged to three ethnic groups with an ancient animosity toward the White race: Mongols, Tatars, and Asiatic Russian Jews. Remember there were no fewer than 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, many of them primed for “revenge sex” against white women.
Don’t forget also that these mentally deranged degenerates, some of them just let out of prison, had been given the green light to rape and kill with impunity by Stalin’s psychotic Jewish propagandist, Ilya Ehrenberg: “Use force and break the racial pride of these German women,” Ehrenberg had instructed. “Take them as your LAWFUL BOOTY! Kill!”
Since publishing this article two days ago, I have received further information from a trusted correspondent that furthers my thesis—and it is only a thesis at this stage—that Russian Jews were among the most likely rape perpetrators. Not only were there 500,000 Jews in the Red Army, there were also regiments in the Red Army consisting entirely of Jews led by Jewish commanders.
Here is a quote from Solzhenitsyn on the Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and later:
“In 1918 Trotsky . . . created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as, for example, the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance…”
It is my contention that Jewish units such as the one mentioned above were largely responsible for the majority of rapes that took place in Germany at this time.
Covering up this fact would have been of vital importance to the Stalin regime with its heavy Jewish component.
Note that the execution of 22,000 Polish officers at Katyn in 1943, known as the Katyn Massacre, was a war crime for which the Nazis were blamed for several decades, before the shocking truth finally emerged only as late as 2010: that Stalin had ordered the massacre and that his loyal henchman, the Jew Lazar Kaganovich, had been the evil genius who had helped to carry it out — the same man, incidentally, who had been behind the starvation of 7-10 million Ukrainians in 1933, known as theHolodomor Famine.
(See “Russian Lawmakers Say Stalin Ordered Massacre of Polish Soldiers.” CNN, November 27, 2010)
That the rape of 2 million German women was carried out largely by Jews within the Red Army is, I believe, another of those grisly facts that have been carefully concealed by the hyper-secretive Stalin regime. This truth will only emerge into the light of day when Soviet archives are finally thrown open to public scrutiny.
Never in the history of the world has such an orgy of rape and mass murder taken place, all of it against the helpless women and children of a great defeated nation, and all with the full connivance of the three great leaders of the victor countries: the blood-bespattered Franklin D. Roosevelt, the coldhearted war criminal Winston Churchill, and that ultimate psychopath and monster in human form, Josef Stalin.
“We must never forget,” Jewish writer Sever Plocker tells us, “that some of the greatest murderers of modern times have been Jewish.”
It is sobering to reflect that the three statesmen pictured below—Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin—may have been little more than helpless puppets in the hands of the shadowy puppet masters standing behind them.
CHURCHILL, ROOSEVELT, STALIN: THE THREE STOOGES
CHURCHILL, ROOSEVELT, STALIN: THE THREE STOOGES OF INTERNATIONAL JEWRY?
And yet . . . and yet Germany’s back was not broken . . . Goodrich ends his book on a note of hope.
When all had been destroyed, when all seemed to have been lost forever in Year Zero, the Germans proved once again that such was just not the case.
Brick by brick, and hour by hour, they rebuilt upon the ruins of God’s Empire a new Germany. No Holocaust by fire, no gynocide, no viricide, no famine, no other inhuman atrocities, could subdue or quench the noble Germanic spirit — which is the essence of the White race of humankind.
Even though Germany today is still an occupied nation with a hurting people, she still possesses that flicker of life and spirituality that the other White races and nations lost long ago when they sold their souls to Judaism and the Jewish “god” of hatred and revenge.
“Unbowed, unbent, unbroken.”
Such are the words of an album released by a European band named Hammerfall. And such are the words that describe the German people, the German folk, the German race.
The only ones who bear the burden of bloodstain and guilt are the Allies. No crimes in recorded history surpass those inflicted against Germany and Europe by the United States, Great Britain and the former Soviet Union—all with the ideological and financial backing of international Jewry.
The death of National Socialist Germany was the death of Western man and everything he once stood for.
I must thank Thomas Goodrich. Hellstorm has changed my life.
J.A. Sexton’s original book review of Hellstorm may be read here.
|December 15th, 2014||#19|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Grinning Jewish Extremists Charged in Jerusalem School Arson
3 Heartless Suspects Charged With Firebombing Mixed School
Published December 15, 2014.
found picture at: http://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Co...rusalem-384685 look how soulless the eyes of the guy at the right looks.
Three Israelis from a far-right group were charged on Monday with setting fire to a classroom in an Arab-Jewish school that has been a symbol of co-existence in Jerusalem.
Israel’s Shin Bet security service said brothers Nahman and Shlomo Twito, aged 18 and 20, and Yitzhak Gabai, 22, belong to Lehava, a group that objects to personal or business relations between Jews and Arabs.
According to the indictment, the men set fire to a classroom in the Hand-in-Hand school last month and sprayed anti-Arab graffiti on the walls of its courtyard. Classes were not in session at the time.
The brothers, who live in a settlement in the occupied West Bank, and Gabai, a resident of Jerusalem, were led into court handcuffed and smiling. They made no comment and were not asked to enter a plea.
More than 600 pupils from pre-school through high school attend Hand-in-Hand. Its student population is divided equally between Israelis and Palestinians, with lessons given in both Arabic and Hebrew.
The Shin Bet said Lehava teaches the ideology of the late Meir Kahane, a far-right, U.S.-born rabbi who won election to the Israeli parliament in 1984 and advocated the expulsion of Palestinians from Israel and the occupied territories.
Labeled racist and undemocratic by Israel, Kahane’s group, Kach, was banned from politics in 1988. Two years later, Kahane was assassinated in New York by an Egyptian-American gunman.
Violence in Israel and the Palestinian Territories has surged in the past few months. Attacks carried out by Palestinians have killed 11 Israelis, and 12 Palestinians have been killed, including several of the assailants.
Last week a Palestinian minister died after a confrontation with Israeli border police in the occupied West Bank. In July, a Palestinian youth was burned to death by Jewish attackers. Three Israeli teens were killed by Palestinian militants in the West Bank in June.
|March 24th, 2015||#20|
Join Date: May 2009
Just who are The Hasbara and Sayanim?