Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 27th, 2010 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default A message of the French revisionist Vincent REYNOUARD

A message of Vincent REYNOUARD

Objet : Audience [hearing] du 26 janvier [January]


I just left the courthouse in Brussels where my appeal was to be heard (appealing the court ruling of June 2008 condemning me to a year in prison and a ca. 20 000 € fine for the offense of revisionism).

The hearing, originally scheduled to take place in September 2009, had been pushed back to today. But this morning my lawyer was unavailable because he had to plead in a trial conducted before the Assises court.

The hearing was today postponed to November 9, 2010, to the chagrin of the lawyers for the opposing party …

I remind all that the facts of my case date back as far as June 2001!

The attorney general has however tried reassuring that according to current legislation the statute of limitations will not be reached before 2013.

But this argument has not pleased our opponents, so the hearing on November 9 was classified as “priority”, which means that no further postponement will be allowed.

I went out a free man from the courthouse and I assure you I did not linger in the area, preferring to seek more clement skies. And I enjoyed using this visit to Brussels to see my children. I must unfortunately confirm that following the official cancellation of my status as a resident of Belgium, my family still has no medical protection, rental help or foodstamps [since I went underground].

[My wife] Marina hopes her efforts will lead finally within a reasonable time to restoring these. For now, she lives only from the charity of friends, whom I thank from the bottom of my heart …

As for me, I am not registered anywhere now as a resident [being "on the lam"]. I think I may soon seek residence somewhere in France to obtain a card for universal medical coverage. But so far nothing has been done.

Again, thank you to all who support us in this race. Our combat continues.

In friendship,

Vincent
 
Old July 17th, 2010 #2
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

The French Revisionist Vincent Reynouard imprisoned



From his Belgian prison Vincent Reynouard asks us to spread the following communiqué:


(fast translation)

(extract)

Dear Friends,

Since July 9th, I am imprisoned to the prison of Forest ( Brussels).

I wait to know if I shall be extradited towards France which demands me so that I make the punishment of one year of imprisonment for which I was condemned in June, 2008 (Court decision of appeal of Colmar).

Since this date, France had aunched an European warrant for arrest against me.

I ignore if I shall be finally extradited, because it is possible that in this affair I can benefit from red tapes to obtain my release.

But I am ready for everything and the eventuality of the prison in France does not frighten me.

It would be even an honor however the activist I am.

In France, it is because a Robert Faurisson, a Paul Rassinier, a Henri Roques, Pierre Marais or a Pierre Guillaume dared to defy the taboo that a young generation was able to know the revisionism and to take back the torch which, or, would have fallen on the ground to go out.

For me, the revisionism is as a foetus which develops ceaselessly. When it will be for maturity, then the hour will have come for him to play its role.

They thus make a mistake seriously those who see in the revisionism the simple questioning of the existence of " gas chambers " in the German camps. If it was only about it, it has been a long time since the debate would be closed... But, really, the stakes in the debate exceed the historic question. And it is because it is perfectly conscious of it that Big Brother pursues mercilessly the Holocaust deniers wherever that they are.

I thus call all the real opponents of the New world Order to support the free research in history as well as the global, frontal debate and without concession led from now on more than ten years by the team of the Objective Historic Truth.

As for me, the judges know that I shall never give in. I shall pursue the fight, whatever are the risks and the consequences. For the Palestinians, for Germany and, especially, for the young generations of Europe so that they are freed of this incapacitating myth which kills our Old Continent.

Vincent REYNOUARD
 
Old July 28th, 2010 #3
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

NEWS from Vincent REYNOUARD

Message of July 25th, 2010


Dear friends,

First of all, thanks to all of you who, following my detention, have written to me here at Forest prison. Having neither envelopes nor stamps in sufficient number, I cannot answer, and I'm sorry for that. Still, thank you for your showings of support, which go straight to my heart. I'll ask those who wish to write me to enclose in their letters a stamped envelope (at "Europe" postal rate) for the reply.

On July 23rd the judges in Brussels declared that the arrest warrant issued for me by France was valid. Therefore extradition is now unavoidable. It will doubtless come about in ten days' time or so.

My lawyers have asked me to take certain actions to try to avoid prison in France, or at least minimize the length of detention. I shall do nothing of the sort. In effect, I want it to be possible to say that in 2010, in France, a father of eight children, aged from 1 to 17, languishes in prison simply for having publicly expressed revisionist arguments.

I want it known that in France, in 2010, a father of eight whose only weapon is a pen languishes in prison.

I'll be told in reply that, for now, 99.9% of people don't care. And it's true. But I repeat: we revisionists look further ahead, towards the day when, with the help of events, moods will change. Perhaps we'll be dead then. But when future researchers, unhindered by current taboos, study this history – our history – of the period 1990-2010 and see the repression of which the revisionists have been victims, then the conclusion to make will be obvious.

As I write, I think of my dear wife and my dear children.

I think of their state of mind... Yesterday, in the visiting room, Marina was crying. She told me my 14-year-old son wasn't eating and that the five "little ones" wanted their father. That hurts but, beside the fact that the Truth holds certain rights over us, if I carry on the revisionist struggle – the implications of which run well beyond the realm of History – I carry it on precisely for my children, as well as for other peoples' children, for the Palestinians, for Europe, and, more generally, for a world rid of this New World Order built on the ruins of the 3rd Reich.

Whatever the hardships, I will never give in. The cops, judges and prisons will make no difference. The seed has been sown; it will germinate and, some day, it will grow.


Vincent REYNOUARD

Last edited by alex revision; July 30th, 2010 at 12:09 PM.
 
Old August 12th, 2010 #4
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

Vincent Reynouard : Latest news


(fast translation)

August 7th, 2010

On August 4th, my lawyer tried last time to tear away me from the claws of the "justice". He pleaded the nullity of the European warrant for arrest which France launched against me. The audience was surrealist.

The prosecutor wanted to demonstrate that I was very present in June, 2008 in my trial in front of the Court of Appeal of Colmar. He quoted an extract of the fact that it claimed to be the ruling returned by this Court of Appeal; we asserted there that I had been present in the audience and that I had been able to express myself lastly.

Now, I am the first one to know that, not having received the summons for this appeal, I was not in the audience. The president then pointed out to the prosecutor that, in the warrant for arrest, it was specified well that the ruling of Colmar had been returned "by default", thus in my absence. Sheepish, the prosecutor then underlined that he possessed only a fragment of the copy of the ruling, thus which he did not know about it more. " Have we the completeness of this ruling? " Finally asked the president by turning to both helpers. "No", he was answered him. In brief, since July 9th the Belgian "justice" took care of my case without having one of the main parts of the file.

"Anyway", made the president, " we do not have to judge the value of the warrant for arrest; Mr Reynouard will go to explain in Colmar, it is everything. " My lawyer retorted: " forgery! The law of 2003 obliges you to verify the legality of the mandate; he has to fill seven conditions; now the sixth is not it. " At this moment the prosecutor launched : " I quote two case law which assert the opposite " (understand : which do not make obligation to the judges to appreciate the legality of the mandate). This dialogue of the deaf lasted even some minutes, then the president interrupted the debates by saying: " well. We are going to verify this detail. Judgment on Friday [in August 6th]. "

And, as expected, the magistrates finally gave reason to the prosecutor. We can however wonder about the value of the "justice" in a country where the case law opposes to the law.

This small anecdote confirms what I always said that is to say, in affairs the real Foundation of which is ideological, it's absolutely vain to hope to go out of it by using the law.

Heroic Ernst Zündel and Germar Rudolf experienced it before me, and in more painful circumstances... The revisionists are the main and the most dangerous enemies of Big Brother. For them, there is neither faith nor law. Full stop

I am thus to be extradited towards France (what I had finally never doubted).

When? Mystery. But I stand firm and shall never give in. Certainly, my body is imprisoned; obliged to stay 11 pm on 24 in 10 m2. But my spirit is free!

I thank wholeheartedly those who write me to support me and to support my admirable wife who stands firm in spite of all the problems in which a mother of 8 children struggles when her husband was deprived of her.

The real hero, here, it's her. Some of you wrote me that one day I shall have my statue. Maybe. But if this day arrive, I ask that we statufie AT FIRST my wife and my children.

Until later

Vincent Reynouard


Monsieur Vincent Reynouard
Prison de Forest
Cell. 903 C
52 avenue de la Jonction
B-1190 FOREST
(Belgium)
 
Old August 20th, 2010 #5
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

NEWS

Vincent is imprisoned in the prison of Valenciennes where he is going to execute the punishment ordered by the Court of Appeal of Colmar (on 1 year of imprisonment).

His wife got on the phone the social worker who said to her that according to remissions he could be released at the end of January / beginning February (considering the specificity of the offence, we can wonder about these remissions: shall we grant them to him?).

As well as in the case of Ernst Zündel, Vincent can receive from the mail, accompanied possibly with photocopies of articles, but neither books, reviews.

Here's his address:

Monsieur Vincent Reynouard
Centre pénitencier de Valenciennes
N° d'écrou: 33034 [Not to omit!]
75 rue Lomprez
B.P. 455
59322 VALENCIENNES Cedex

FRANCE
 
Old August 25th, 2010 #6
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

For to help Vincent Reynouard in prison you can:

Make a bank transfer

Here's the address of the bank for transfers coming from the whole world

(indeed to mention also his name and his number) :


Vincent REYNOUARD

N° 33034

IBAN: FR 76 1007 1590 0000 0010 1785 969

BIC: BDFEFRPPXXX


Holder of the account:

MA Valenciennes
A.P – Régie comptes nominatifs
75 rue Lomprez, BP 80 455
59322 Valenciennes Cedex

FRANCE

Last edited by alex revision; August 26th, 2010 at 08:32 AM.
 
Old August 27th, 2010 #7
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

A MESSAGE FROM VINCENT REYNOUARD

REGARDING THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION



The courageous petition launched in my behalf by Paul-Eric Blanrue again brings up the matter of limits to freedom of expression. In the name of what, exactly, might such limits be imposed? To answer this crucial question, let’s ask ourselves: why, in general, is freedom ever limited? [1] The image of a fence with a sign on it reading "Forbidden: danger” seems to me the best of answers: the purpose of limiting freedom is to protect.

First of all comes the protection of the individual, the integrity of his body, his life, his reputation and, in some societies where religion is prominent, his soul. Hence all laws against calls to violence, incitement to murder, insults, defamation, invasion of privacy and also, in certain societies, blasphemy and heresy.

Then, on a more general level, comes the protection of society as guarantor of the common good, therefore of civil peace and the lives of citizens. Thus justification is offered for laws against subversion, whether direct (calls to revolt...) or indirect (promotion of ideas adverse to the reigning ideology).

Naturally these restrictive laws, which reflect a people’s culture, will be liable to vary according to time and place. Moreover, the problem of excess of power may arise. Still, such abuse as occurs never calls into question the principle itself. That is why I do not condemn, per se, the existence of laws limiting freedom, including that of expression. But it is essential to prevent excesses of power, and to speak out against them when they happen.

Are the so-called "anti-revisionist" laws unjust? That is the question here. Several arguments have been put forth in support of the answer “no”.

I shall quickly dismiss the first of these, which consists in invoking the "suffering" of victims who should be protected from intolerable affronts. This argument might be of some worth if the revisionists denied the existence of anti-semitic persecution under Hitler and likened the concentration lager to holiday camps. But that is not at all so. Contrary to the message conveyed in the media, the revisionists are not "deniers"; if they denounce the lies of the official version, they try at the same time to discover and explain what really happened. And in this truer history, the victims’ suffering remains tragically present.

A second argument offered to justify anti-revisionist laws consists in asserting that the "revisionist enterprise (...) is anti-semitism, which is not an opinion but an offence". [2]

To begin, I shall reply that if the link between revisionism and anti-semitism were so plain to see, so obvious, then there would have been no need, in France for example, for an anti-revisionist law; the 1972 statute punishing racism (and thus anti-semitism) would have sufficed.

In reality, that link is so unobvious that it takes some clever reasoning to assert its existence. This reasoning, as I have heard it several times from the mouths of lawyers speaking against us in our court cases (I think especially of barristers Korman and Lorach), can be summed up as follows:

"For centuries, anti-Semites have conveyed the image of Jews who would lie and use dishonest schemes in order to steal money and, in so doing, become the most powerful people on Earth (cf. the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion). That is exactly the message of Holocaust deniers, because they say the Jews are lying with their Shoah stories, that they are mighty enough to impose this lie of theirs on the whole world and then take advantage of it to steal money from Germany, Switzerland, Austria, etc. Conclusion: Holocaust denial is a modern form of traditional anti-semitism. With today’s anti-semites, it’s no longer: ‘Death to the Jews!’, but rather: ‘The Jews didn’t die!’; the end goal, however, is the same."

In this line of reasoning, one sentence is crucial: "They say the Jews are lying with their Shoah stories." Indeed. But what if, in effect, the Shoah is just a myth? What’s to be said of those who have steadily avoided any debate for over 30 years in order to be able to go on telling their tales? Are they not witting liars? What’s to be said of the laws passed nearly all over Europe to protect this historical lie, and this one alone? Are they not proof of the power of certain Jewish lobbies? And what of the billions paid to Israel by Germany in “reparations” for the (alleged) genocide? Doesn’t it all add up to an enormous swindle?

It’s there to see: the case made for the anti-revisionist laws by their Jewish advocates is based wholly on the reality of the (alleged) "Holocaust". If that reality becomes the subject of a lively debate, the case collapses like any house of cards. Therefore, before making it, they ought to allow free research and a free confrontation of points of view. An open and fair debate about the (alleged) "Holocaust" should be permitted.

However, it is precisely that peremptory argument which is used to forbid not just any debate, but also any public expression of revisionist arguments. Consequently, the situation is this: we are told that the "Holocaust" is historical truth and that to deny it amounts to anti-semitism. But anti-semitism is an offence, therefore disputing the reality of the “Holocaust" must be prohibited.

Stripped of all those intermediate steps, the argument
becomes: “the ‘Holocaust’ is a reality, there is no discussing that; therefore those who want to discuss it must be condemned." This is totally – frightfully – arbitrary.

A third argument in favour of anti-revisionist laws consists in saying that questioning of the "Holocaust" aims at re-establishing National Socialism.

Doubtless. But if, indeed, the Shoah is only a slander, then the people who are accused of it and, more generally, the regime so accused must be rehabilitated on this point. It’s only right.

I shall be told in reply that the revisionist undertaking seeks, ultimately, an overall rehabilitation of National Socialism, so as to pave the way again for that ideology.

*— Must I infer from this that, once rid of the number 1 charge against it, Hitlerism would exert an irresistible appeal on the masses, so positive an ideology would it then be?

— Good God, no!, will come the retort. With or without the Shoah, Nazism remains a hateful ideology by its imperialism, its contempt for others and its absolute denial of individual freedom.

— Then what are you afraid of? Since that ideology is such a horror, why are you afraid that people might let it be restored? And then, especially as, with or without the Shoah, National Socialism remains indefensible, why this law making it an offence to question the existence of crimes against humanity?

It’s plain to see: far from justifying the existence of the Gayssot Act, this third argument turns against those who let it loose. For in the end it shows that for the anti-revisionists, it’s a question of defending – protecting – not a historical truth but rather a political "truth" that serves as their weapon in an ideological struggle. The alleged "Holocaust" ensures that it will never be possible to hold a serene and fair debate allowing people objectively to compare the relative appropriateness of liberal ideals and Fascist ideals. With history locked shut, political discussion is locked shut. A glaring example of abuse of power!

This leaves a fourth argument, Zionist in essence. "In denying the Holocaust”, we are told, “you want to undermine the legitimacy of Israel, and thus make a new ‘Holocaust’ possible."

First, let me emphasise that these geopolitical considerations have no right intervening in a controversy that, by its nature, stands exclusively within the area of History. The Germans either did or did not exterminate the Jews between 1941 and 1945. It's one or the other, and the correct answer cannot depend on current events in the Middle East. In this debate, it’s the historian who must answer, not the geopolitical specialist and still less the Zionist.

I’ll add, however, that the truth about the alleged "Holocaust" will necessarily have repercussions in the Middle East. Since the year 1945 (indeed, since 1942) the Zionists have been using the Allies’ war lies to support their projects. It’s no accident that Israel emerged less than two years after the end of the great Nuremberg trial, which made the myth official. With no Shoah, Israel wouldn’t have seen the light of day. That being the case, with the collapse of the myth the Jewish State will, necessarily, collapse.

Will there consequently be a new "Holocaust"? I don’t think so, although there will certainly, inevitably be instances where things get out of hand in Palestine. But what would you expect? One cannot, with impunity, maintain a situation of injustice for more than 60 years running... Some day or other there will be a price to pay. Personally, I think the Jews will gain much in evacuating Israel peacefully rather than staying on doggedly till the day – the inevitable day – their expulsion comes about.

Even though it may seem cynical, I’ll state here that, all things considered, the victory of revisionism would be a lesser evil for the Zionists.

The conclusion of all this? It’s that nothing, absolutely nothing, justifies the so-called anti-revisionist laws. They are only abuses of power perpetrated by individuals afraid of certain geopolitical and political discussions. Individuals hoping to maintain, for as long as possible, a status quo that’s to their own liking.

For the moment, the peoples of the Western world condone, wittingly or not, this myth. They accept it because they see or feel, vaguely, that the New World Order, guarantor of their hedonistic impulses, finds in the "Holocaust" a weapon enabling it to prevent thoroughly any bothersome discussion and thus, any traumatic calling into question.

No matter that it’s a slander proffered against millions of people (from Hitler to Pope Pius XII, along with bodies like the Red Cross); no matter that this slander is also the source of the ongoing tragedy of an entire people: the Palestinian people. "I’ve got Internet, my laptop, my flat screen TV, etc., that's where I place my ideals in life. As for the rest, I just hope that, with time, everything will turn out all right and everyone else can enjoy my standard of living..."

This near-universal indifference must not, however, weigh down on us. For our duty is to stand up to the lies, the injustice and the slander. We must therefore act without concern for success or failure. We must ceaselessly repeat: the alleged homicidal "gas chambers" in the wartime German camps did not exist, the "Holocaust" is a myth, the "six million" a delirious estimate and the anti-revisionist laws an abuse of power unworthy of an enlightened society.

People find fault with me for being a "desperado", for asserting my traditional Catholicism and my National Socialism. Most of them have never read me. They know neither what my Catholicism is nor what my National Socialism is. Let them start by reading me. Afterwards we can discuss things in the concrete.

The forces we’re fighting against are very powerful. But as they’re grounded in lies, their feet are made of clay. Take the example of repression: thanks to a tailor-made law the mighty can hunt us down, put us on trial, convict us, steal our money, tear us from our families and throw us between four grim walls. At the moment, with the people an accomplice by their approval or fearful silence, this mode of action may well appear frighteningly efficient.

But the day when, subsequent to external events, minds change and taboos falter, the treatment we’ve received thus far will bear powerful witness for us and against them. People will look back at today and say: “What?! They had only their pens; they demanded a fair debate to pit the two arguments against each other and you, you who had millions, you with your radio and television networks, newspapers and cinema, you hunted them down, convicted them, ruined them, threw them in prison, tore them from their families?! – They were anti-semites, Fascists, Nazis, you say? Oh dear! But an argument’s worth doesn’t depend on the person who makes it: its value, if any, is intrinsic. – They threatened public safety, did they? Oh dear! Amidst the din from your televisions and the rest, their voices weren’t a cry or even a whisper, but a mere murmur. But for you, that murmur was too much. You must really have feared the power of their message to react that way. However, only the truth has any power. That’s enough for me to conclude who, in this matter, was telling the truth."

That is why, today, we have to suffer. Contrary to what some think, our suffering is not in vain; it’s like seeds that we sow.

Tomorrow, the harvest will be plentiful.

Vincent Reynouard


Prison of Forest, Belgium, August 18, 2010

_________________________________________

[1] I speak here of freedom in the modern sense of the word, that is, individual freedom grounded in the Rights of Man, according to which there is no such thing as human nature, the individual constructing himself each day in line with his own will, a will which, in order to find expression, must be guaranteed essential freedoms.


[2] Argument developed once again recently by the barrister of the “Association of sons and daughters of Jews deported from France”, Mr Didier Bouthors, before the Cour de Cassation, France’s highest court (see the French Catholic daily La Croix, May 10, 2010).
 
Old September 24th, 2010 #8
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

News of Vincent Reynouard

Passages of Vincent Reynouard's letter, to his wife, dated September 16th, 2010.

(fast translation)

(...)

I shall not describe you all that we live here on bother, on humiliations and on disappointments with the majority of the guards (not the totality, fortunately) which treat us without any kindness and refuse our requests sometimes the most justifiable. It is very simple: I learnt to ask them to nothing more. We forget me for the walk? I do not demand.

We forget me for the shower? I do not demand. (...) We refuse that I give my bread or my coffee to a neighbor who asks to me for it? I do not recriminate.

We had said to me " For your stamps, made a ' exceptional canteen ': ask for the price rates which you want, we shall buy them from you ". I made a "canteen" on September 5th. I always wait.

The day before yesterday I wrote to ask for explanations: no answer.

During this time, more 200 stamps than us had sent to me are seized and " put in the "cloakroom" a lower floor. And I, in my cell , I have not than 2 stamps anymore for France. In brief, here I am clamped. But I say nothing. I learnt to undergo...

And I do not say to you everything so that this letter is not retained by the censorship (hello to you who read!).

As say prisoners in the walk: it's the misery here.

Above everybody agrees.

I do not write you it to worry you or so that you feel sorry for my fate.

It's useless and then, as I often write it, my conditions of detention remain nevertheless bearable. Everything is affair of mental. It is necessary to learn to hope for nothing, to seize what offers and to forget without regret what is inaccessible.

I hang on to my German, to my painting and to the small library where I go 45minutes a week: on Mondays mornings, it is my small paradise in this prison.

(...)
 
Old November 6th, 2010 #9
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

With Paul-Eric Blanrue, against the Gayssot Act
and for Vincent Reynouard

 
It's wrong when we are denied the right to challenge common beliefs or culture, especially when everyone knows that the books are written by the victors. It doesn't stem from hate to say "I don't believe" whatever. This anti free speech stuff always irks me. This is nothing like a call to violent action even. (Steve Wozniak)

That is the comment with which Steve Wozniak, co-founder of Apple Computers (see his biography at
Steve_Wozniak Steve_Wozniak
), has recently accompanied his signature of the petition launched in France by historian Paul-Eric Blanrue against the Gayssot Act and in favour of Vincent Reynouard. The Gayssot Act of July 13, 1990 prohibits the diffusion of historical revisionism on pain of imprisonment and fine.

On the grounds of this law, Vincent Reynouard, aged 41 and a father of eight, was in 2007 sentenced to one year in prison without probation and ordered to pay about €70,000 for having written a 16-page pamphlet entitled Holocauste ? Ce que l'on vous cache...("Holocaust? What’s being kept hidden from you...").At the request of the French authorities, who had issued a "European arrest warrant" for him, he was arrested by the Belgian police last July in Brussels, where he lived with his family, then jailed in Belgium for over fifty days before being extradited to France. He is now incarcerated in Valenciennes in northern France.

And throughout the Western world the mainstream media ignore the fact that in France an honest man, father of eight children, is serving a year in prison and must pay €70,000 because he authored a piece of writing of sixteen pages.

For his part Noam Chomsky has stated his position in a letter against the Gayssot Act and in defence of Vincent Reynouard. You may find that letter at The full statement from Noam Chomsky to the release of Vincent and the repeal of the law Gayssot | Comité de soutien à Vincent Reynouard.Currently there are a thousand signers of the petition.

I invite you to add your signature to theirs once you have read the English version of the press release, posted at French author Vincent Reynouard sentenced to one year in prison presenting Mr Reynouard’s case and showing the e-mail address to which to send your name; please indicate your place of residence and, if you wish, your profession.

Thank you.

Best wishes,

Robert Faurisson (November 5, 2010)

Last edited by alex revision; November 6th, 2010 at 12:34 PM.
 
Old December 5th, 2010 #10
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

We don't forget!





December 6th


Vincent REYNOUARD


Imprisoned for 150 days!


We would be grateful to you for sending a word of support and encouragements to Mr. Vincent Reynouard (He's fluent in English):


Vincent REYNOUARD
Centre pénitencier de Valenciennes
N° d’écrou: 33034
75 rue Lomprez
B.P. 80455
59322 VALENCIENNES Cedex
FRANCE
 
Old December 6th, 2010 #11
Susan
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,359
Susan
Default

I wish I had some money to send him and his family but I don't. But, I will send him a Christmas card wishing him well and letting him know people are thinking of him and admiring him for his strong stance for free speech.

Last edited by Susan; December 6th, 2010 at 12:28 PM.
 
Old March 7th, 2013 #12
barù
Member
 
barù's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: R.S.I. : Repubblica Sionista Italiana
Posts: 366
barù
Default solidarietà

Chi vuole aiutare, in forma del tutto privata e discreta, la famiglia (moglie e 8 figli) del prof. Vincent Reynouard, rinchiuso in carcere per “revisionismo storico”, può - con molta delicatezza e salva restando la dignità del professore - inviare un obolo alla sua sposa Marina Godefroy tramite Western Union, presso un ufficio postale o centri specifici Western Union. Occorre indicare il suo nome (Marina), cognome (Godefroy), la sua data di nascita (29 settembre 1972) e l’indirizzo:

107, chaussée de Vleurgat B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgio.

Poi invierà alla signora tramite mail ([email protected]) il codice in 13 cifre della Western Union indicando la somma dell’offerta e il proprio nome e cognome.

Grazie a tutti!

d. Curzio Nitoglia
http://www.doncurzionitoglia.com/app..._reynouard.htm
__________________
DANIELE DIEGO LUCA MIRKO PRIGIONIERI POLITICI DAL 16/11/2012 http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?s...65207&t=149813
 
Old March 11th, 2013 #13
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,942
alex revision
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barù View Post

107, chaussée de Vleurgat B-1000 Bruxelles, Belgio.
That's an old addresse!



How to help and contact Vincent REYNOUARD:

E-MAIL :

[email protected]

[email protected]


By Mail :


Monsieur Urbain Cairat

C.P. 1528

CH-1820 MONTREUX

SWITZERLAND
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.
Page generated in 0.14690 seconds.