Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old May 5th, 2012 #61
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

I'm going to try to sum up my view briefly and quickly.

First, a side point: it is sad we can't use simple words like nazi or libertarian without setting off predictable shrieks. Even smart people respond to these like their chain has been jerked. Their mouth opens, their eyes close, their brain short circuits.

Look, race is only a big deal where freedom and segregation are outlawed. Once the race problem is cleared up, which is not intellectually difficult, but politically extremely difficult, what is left? How we live among ourselves. And it is here that the 'libertarians' have a great deal of insight and findings and wise advice to offer. And it's not even that most or many of them disagree on race. If they did, they wouldn't support free association, as they are ideologically bound to do. So by their own bullshit they are not even allowed to not support the main legal prop allowing white men to protect their own communities. So implicitly they are on our side already. And if they don't emphasize this and other pertinent freedoms, it is because of cowardice, which is found pretty much everywhere you look outside WN on the matter of race, and/or because they are focused on the fed or foreign policy or some other area - where again, what they want is pretty much 100% of what WN want too.

What a lot of WN don't understand, because they don't have the intellectual or social background, is that we can combine two extremely strong and naturally dovetailing appeals:

- the chance to live in an all-White nation;
- the chance to live as free and responsible adults, rather than as 'human resources'

Too many WN want a wipe-your-ass social welfare state that is in no particular different from the ZOG we have now in terms of the scope of government control, oversight and what is laughably called 'needed services' provision.

But this is not what we want. We do not want a WN that caters to White niggers.

The only thing we owe the poorer, dumber half of our population is this:

- racial protection as part of our collective;
- the right to keep money honestly earned.

For education, health care and the rest, it is up to them to arrange, just as it is for the right half of the bell curve. The government, under my White administration, will not be used to plunder the able to succor the defectives.

You'll notice the 99% overlap between WN who can't spell common words and WN who think all we need is to replace the Z in ZOG with a W.

We need a society fit not just for White men but for white Men.

Most WN leaders have never sat down and thought about what a White Man is. I have. A white man is someone capable of making his own decisions and arrangements. If he's not, then he's simply a white nigger, and our cause is a waste of time.

Last edited by Alex Linder; May 7th, 2012 at 01:18 PM.
 
Old May 5th, 2012 #62
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Ronsavelle View Post
I left MR some time ago. By coincidence I saw the part about antinomians.

I have never been moved negatively like I have at MR. I sensed a willful refusal to understand real economics. My rage got worse and worse, without abatement. I was up at 4AM to get water and my first thought was homicide. No other site has produced any lasting reaction like that. I left.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: until this movement can shed its crazies/liars/moles/general dysfunctionals, we’re not getting anywhere, or at least not as far as we could. There are very, very few places on the internet where quality discussions of our people’s future can really take place. To have them disrupted and cluttered with increasingly outlandish liars, slanderers, and nutcases is not doing anyone any good…including the nuts. (from MR)
They have English leftists like Lister who live in a bubble, and have never actually been around people who don't think like they do, hence they can't believe others who aren't socialists are actually serious. Then you have the proprietor, an intelligent and seemingly well meaning fellow, allowing a crank natural or artificial by the name of Richards to call almost literally every single person in WN who's not him a jew or agent of jews. I left MR for good when he was allowed to lie that VNN had denied the Mossad's production values behind '9/11.' When I pointed out not only had I supported this theory publicly, our main thread dealing with this question was stickied in our main forum and appeared to have more views than pretty much any other thread on the forum. The baselessness of his lie proved, he refused to retract his claim but repeated it. I don't tolerate that. I won't help any site that allows that kind of lying to take place without consequences. And Guessedworker was, or is, allowing this known liar Richards to be master editor of the site.

If all others abandon standards, we will not here.
 
Old May 16th, 2012 #63
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[from OD]

I hope the race realist philo-semites are paying attention. John Derbyshire sided with Israel and Jews for years. Unsurprisingly, it did not buy him any good will from Jonah Goldberg, John Podoretz and crew. This is what happens when you align with Jews.

Correct.

Notice Fudgy Pudgy misusing my 'faileocon' to describe the jewfuls at National Review. 'Faileocon' refers only to paleocons; it points up their complete and utter destuction at the hands of jewed conservatives such as those at NR. The cons at NR haven't failed, they have succeeded. They dominate and define modern conservatism. The paleocons sit under the table and whimper and feebly lick around for crumbs.
 
Old May 16th, 2012 #64
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

National Review is worse than wrong - it's boring. It used to be a great magazine, even in spite of its politics, which were a mix of good and bad. Now it's just TASS/right. Nothing but special pleading for Israel and...I don't know what else because I stopped reading it ten years ago.

Fudgy Pudgy is foolish to call what he does 'discourse poisoning.'

The li'l feller doesn't leave the opposition much work to do when he openly calls himself a poisoner and a terrorist. The second is if anything even worse. No, you're not a terrorist, you're a typist. But should you ever get called to court, that'll sound real good being read back to you front of a jury of AmeriKwan retardates, to be redundant.

[OD commenter Denise]

I just cannot believe how so-called “educated, elite” people are absolutely determined to destroy Civilization, and themselves, in the process. Their nastiness – and they ARE NASTY – betokens a certain level of self-awareness. They are dripping with HATRED. They call us Haters – but we, underneath all our anger, and despair, are trying to preserve life and limg, and that whch is worth preservingf. We don’t talk aobut this enough – but we ARE positive, underneath our collective horror. We want tpo livve. We believe in Life, and tryng to create the Best LIFE we can create. I beeleive that this is basic, decent healthy impulse is what motivates all our actions, on the most fundamental level. We are the Light Bearers

Not those creatures. They ARE death dealers. Not merely physical death – the death of the soul. The death of Light, and the very Spark of Life. And, in some fundamental level – the know what they are doing. They know.


That's correct. And that's why we at VNN always underline that "We are the good guys."

Leaving aside the jews, the WASPs and others who sellout with them or work alongside them out of similar mindset respect nothing but their own ego. They inflict blacks on others as a form of hubris. They'll bow before no man nor reality either when it comes to their alchemical activity - trying to turn niggers into human beings.

In one sense our side, mostly made up of conservatives, are good people - because they, in good faith, try to prove what they say. They are decent to do that. But decency doesn't win in politics. The other knows we're right. They see in niggers the same thing we do. Everybody does, black, white or green. But that doesn't mean they share the obvious conclusion. The conclusion is only obvious to us.

Rather than prove our case, we must assume our case. The proof is for backgrounders to get newbies up to speed; our fighters simply assume we're right and laugh as they punch rather than raising their fingers to remonstrate and niggle and beg to differ. Does anyone understand what I'm saying?

Our case is the most obvious thing in the world. It no more needs be proved than a supermodel must prove she is beautiful. Rather it needs to be championed and vindicated.
 
Old May 17th, 2012 #65
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

PS If Derb’s piece is sufficiently beyond the pale that its author must be terminated immediately, why is its publisher — our old friend Taki — proudly listed on the NR masthead?
Ha, well, you see, Taki has a lot of...clout.

Whenever a mainstream white bloviator is speaking on race it is always with the same detached air that they would use if discussing the movements of driver ants in east Africa. The notion of being personally invested in the welfare of their own people is beyond the pale.

In contrast, mainstream blacks and jews spit, sputter, and howl in explicit and personal racial solidarity…The only distinction between the two appearing in verbal facility.

If the empire of anti-white liberalism is ever to wane, this will be one of the first inflection points: a white commentator takes his own side…and lives.


Well said.
 
Old May 17th, 2012 #66
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Fleming on Derbyshire:

I have also advised him that he has been too candid on race matters. There is hardly a subject on which Americans can stand to know the truth or even hear it discussed, and race heads the list of taboo subjects, taking precedence even over sex and gender issues.

First, this is wrong. Americans have no problem discussing race. The proof is the comments column of every newspaper out there. They all censor racial comments. Why? Because the comments are uniformly to the right, to the white side, of the opinions expressed by the System reporters.

Fleming tells this lie in order to excuse his own cowardice. He and his brethren conservative cowards will always fob off their responsibility. Instead of their leading, and anyone running a magazine or website IS offering intellectual leadership, they want to write about the potty little shit they enjoy, rather than telling their people what they need to hear. How did our nation end up where it is? Men like Fleming, by their cowardly evasions, stood aside and let the jews triumph.

Race is taboo because "the American people" don't want to discuss it? Bullshit. It's taboo because the jews that control the media don't want it discussed - except in their terms. This has produced an immense underground anger, as Whites increasingly come to realize just how screwed they are in this country. Fleming is simly a coward. Rather than admit, as even the Derbyshitter he's writing about dared, that jews run things in this country, and his words are conditioned by fear of them, he pretends it's the American people who don't want the truth discussed.

Fleming is a perfect conservative: an excuse-making coward.
 
Old May 17th, 2012 #67
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Race is the deepest issue. It is the natural basis of conservatism. How can you conserve a culture without preserving the blood it springs from? So even if it were true that people didn't want to hear the truth it would be the conservative knowledge-man's professional and moral duty to tell them that truth, to lead them into the light.

There is no accurate way to convey the deep contempt I feel for men like Fleming. They are utterly contemptible cowards. Men like Fleming are the reason the United States has been destroyed.
 
Old May 17th, 2012 #68
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Respectfully, can I ask how is John Derbyshire showing us respect by calling the people to his right a bunch of crazies and agreeing that the right needs to be policed to keep out the crazies? The people to his right were just about the only people to aggressively defend his essay. Yet he had kinder words for Rich Lowry and the execrable William F. Buckley, Jr. than them.

That's right. How are WN going to be respected by others when they don't respect themselves? Part of respecting yourself means not pretending people who don't agree with WN positions are your friends rather than chasing them like fangirls. Derbyshire is a race-mixer. His writing about race has contributed nothing we didn't have earlier and better from men who really are on our side.

Derbyshire is not our friend, he is our enemy. Keep fawning on him, though. That will change things.

WN must be a jealous cause. It must hate and fight competitors, not fawn over them. Conservatives are our most dangerous competitors for the minds of the people we're trying to reach. They have more money and are better positioned than we are. When you throw in our sucking up to them, how can we possibly win? We can't.

Last edited by Alex Linder; June 19th, 2012 at 02:41 PM.
 
Old May 18th, 2012 #69
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The US is literally awash in gas. Look up how much we export. The reality is nothing like what is reported in the media. White people on these sites talk non stop about how the media, politicians, academia, every spokesperson, journalist, you name it, lies continuously and totally inverts reality concerning race. White people on these sites ridicule any talk about the Jewish Holocaust. But the same people apparently believe them on most other subjects.

Amen. Been having to make this point over and over. A common criticism of WN is that it is too abstract, it's not real. This is not true, but to the extent there is a kernel of reality to it, it lies in the fact that because people agree there are racial problems does not mean they are united racially in what is to be done, nor that they agree on sub-racial political matters.
 
Old May 18th, 2012 #70
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Until the federal gov’t explicitly Constitutionally acknowledges and enshrines man’s God-given Right to Free Association, there’s going to be more and more trouble.

We hear an awful lot obout "God-given" rights. We never, ever hear about God-vindicated rights.
 
Old May 25th, 2012 #71
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The jew is the problem that prevents the rest of the problems from being dealt with. Thus, the jew is the meta-problem.

Our inability even to perceive the jew as the source of our problems and inability to deal with problems is itself a product mostly of bogus ideas (christ cultism; anything political taught in public schools) spread by jews through jewed institutions.
 
Old June 19th, 2012 #72
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[Greg Johnson asked me to respond to three articles; this is the first. My comments will be posted in between in blue. I'll be working on posting/commenting on all three articles the rest of the day and tomorrow if need be. My comments will appear in bits and pieces, so may want to wait or refresh. I will also comment on the many comments on Johnson's piece, which you can read through the link at the bottom.]

Our Fault?
Greg Johnson

2,996 words

Swedish translation here

The existing American system has driven white birthrates below replacement while flooding the country with fast-breeding non-white immigrants, both legal and illegal; it promotes racial integration, miscegenation, anti-white discrimination, multiculturalism, and diversity worship; it denigrates white achievements and pathologizes white pride and ethnocentrism while stoking non-white resentment, entitlement, and truculence; and it apparently has no brakes.

If these conditions persist, our race will become extinct. And since genocide is defined not merely as killing a people outright, but also as creating conditions inimical to their long-term survival, the present system is not merely anti-white, it is genocidally anti-white.

Well said.

A common claim among racially-conscious conservatives and White Nationalists is that this slow-motion anti-white genocide is “our fault,” sometimes even “all our fault.” To give just two recent examples, Patrick Buchanan entitled his latest book on the decline of white America Suicide of a Superpower. Alex Kurtagic, speaking at the 2012 American Renaissance conference, reportedly said, “Western man has brought catastrophe on himself . . . . Western man has become his own worst enemy, opening his borders to the rest of the world and thus ‘sponsoring his own decline.’” (For other examples, see Tanstaafl’s discussions of the “suicide meme” at Age of Treason.)

1. The claim that white dispossession is entirely our fault is absurd on the face of it, since it denies that other groups exercise any agency and bear any responsibility at all. It exculpates the non-whites flooding into white lands, driving us from our homes, destroying our cultures, and crowding out our posterity.

But it is more than absurd. It is repugnant. It implies that white victims of non-white rapists, robbers, and killers are responsible for their plight, but their assailants are not. It implies that Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian were responsible for their own torture and murder at the hands of a gang of blacks, not the blacks themselves.

Whites, however, find such grandiose claims irresistible, for even when we flagellate ourselves for being responsible for all the evils in the world, we secretly revel in the fact that we are the masters of the world, the only people who matter, the only people who make history.

Hmm...Agree with the absurd and repugnant, but I don't think self-flattery is the driver behind 'suicide.' Most times, the user is simply brainlessly repeating something he picked up from a heavy like Sam Francis. Francis got it from James Burnham. What Fat Sam should have noticed/realized and broadcast was that it dovetails perfectly with the claims of the people who are actually causing the problem - the jews, aka, the murderers. Western culture, which is a dysphemism for the White race, is being murdered. The murderers are the jews. Not observing this is a matter of low character (self-interest and cowardice, most notably) masquerading as a difference of opinion. Masses of white men have never voted to elect a new people by opening the borders. They have voted against that many times. But their votes end up being canceled by the media, the judges, the executive (as nigger Obama did just the other day). With no effective representation among the elite, it must come as a double pain to hear about how they are committing national suicide, to the ones that are awake. I should say that a people that is scolded, harassed, hectored and lectured around the clock about the holy thing that is diversity yet routinely votes against it is the opposite of suicidal. They very much want to live. They seek, they need, only leadership. It is that leadership that Big Jew and its whiteskin sellouts and catspaws goes out of its way to crush. That crushing is what we should be calling murder and laying at the feet of the murderers - the jews and those of any race who serve as their goons and accountants.

But in the end, when push comes to shove, people who believe themselves guilty for all the evil in the world will give way before the force of people who believe themselves morally righteous. White guilt is promoted to ease the way to white dispossession and white genocide.

Yes. Everything is done to induce in average whites guilt, misery, fear and other bad things, all of which reduce their desire and ability to resist their own targeting for destruction. All whites can feel these things, as they are common throughout the media and the garbage spewed in public schools, even if comparatively few whites can trace the psychological onslaught to its source and understand its meaning.

2. Whenever you hear talk about what “we” are doing to “ourselves,” you should be suspicious. For collectives do not act. Individuals and small, like-minded elites act in their names. In every society, there are those who rule and those who are ruled. There are those who do things, and those who have things done to them.

Thus “America” is not committing suicide. Some Americans are destroying the country for the rest of us, because it is to their advantage. And if one looks at those who are promoting and profiting from America’s decline, Jews are massively overrepresented among them, although there are white culprits as well.

Agreed and would always throw in here Churchill's observation about the original communism, which applies just as well to any other form of radicalism you care to inspect:

the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.

Name the jew means when the jew is guilty of something, he is held responsible. Nothing more. It's a phrase and admonition that wouldn't need to exist if conservatives weren't cowardly evaders and endless employers of euphemism. The people who use the inaccurate suicide for the accurate murder like to mock 'name the jew' because it is too direct, reasonable and powerful, thereby showing up their cowardly evasions for what they are, even if only indirectly. Imagine a real leader like Hitler saying "we are doing it to ourselves." Unthinkable. Cowardice is so entrenched in conservatism it amounts to its backbone and balls. Indeed, I don't think there is a difference. Conservatism is the political form of cowardice, at least for anyone aspiring to actual change rather than mere analysis.


3. Before we weigh the sense in which whites are responsible for our own predicament, we have to state clearly that 90% of the time, the claim that it is “our fault” is not being advanced as a serious, sincere proposition. Thus one would be a fool to analyze it as such. Most of the time, the claim that white dispossession is “our fault” really means one thing: that it is not the fault of the organized Jewish community. The primary purpose of blaming whites is merely to avoid blaming Jews. Questions of plausibility aside, one could just as well blame God, witches, or space aliens, so long as attention is directed away from the Jews.

Buchanan, for example, knows that many of the destructive policies that he chronicles in his book were pushed by the organized Jewish community in order to enhance their power at the expense of whites. But Buchanan has chosen to play by Semitically-correct rules, so he treats the Jews as part of “us” and then claims that “we” are doing it to ourselves. Whatever Kurtagic actually thinks is going on, he had to blame whites, for American Renaissance forbids White Nationalists from criticizing Jews (while sponsoring Jews to criticize White Nationalism).

So nine times out of ten, when somebody claims white dispossession is “our fault,” this is a dishonest attempt to avoid talking about the Jewish question. Of course the motives, and thus the blameworthiness, of these lies vary. Some are told by sincere white advocates playing an angle. Others are told by Jews hoping to prevent whites from effectively resisting genocide.

4. Some white advocates argue that not all of us should talk about the Jewish problem. Education takes place in stages. One does not study geometry before arithmetic. Before one can understand the Jewish role in the race problem, one first has to understand that there is a race problem at all. First we must learn the facts. Then we can get to the explanation. Furthermore, people have been so brainwashed by racial egalitarianism that it is very difficult to get them to think critically about race. The job is even harder if one throws the Jewish question into the mix, given the six million ways our people have been brainwashed about Jews — from the churches, the schools, the mass media, and popular culture.

This argument has merit, but it does not justify lying about the “suicide” of the West. It is one thing to focus on educating our people about the race problem and leaving the Jewish question to someone else. It is quite another thing to cover for the Jews by claiming that they are white like us and that we are the cause of our own dispossession.

If one wishes to focus on the race question alone, then how should one answer when the Jewish question is raised? An honest answer is simply to point out that there is a debate within the white advocate community about the Jewish role in white dispossession. This answer takes no side but conceals no truths either. It does not amount to complicity with and covering for Jewish subversion. One should state it flatly and then get back on message.

5. Now that we have dealt with the dishonest use of the “our fault” meme, we can deal with the actual question: To what extent is white dispossession our fault? I believe that white dispossession is, to some extent, our own fault. Thus white dispossession is not entirely the fault of the Jews. The Jews could not have done this to us without white collaboration.

6. But we have to analyze what is meant by “fault” here. In the minimum sense, being at fault refers to being a causal factor in one’s own downfall. The strongest sense of “fault” is specifically moral culpability. Moral culpability is relative to two factors: power and knowledge. The more power one has to promote or halt white dispossession, the more responsibility one has. The more knowledge one has of white dispossession, the more responsibility one has.

The fact that many whites think that it is moral to promote the destruction of their own people is no excuse. They know very well that they are harming people, evading reality, and telling lies, even if they think that it is justified by their ultimate ends.

There is also a sense in which moral ignorance should never be treated as an excuse, for above any particular moral imperative is the moral imperative to know the truth about right and wrong. We ought to know what we ought to do. People who labor under false moral systems ought to know better. We all ought to know better, because we all ought to do right.

One can also be at fault in a morally innocent way. One can, for instance, have the best of intentions but still contribute to evil because one is enmeshed in a system that transforms good intentions and deeds into evil results. But once one becomes aware of how one’s decent acts are perverted to serve evil ends, one is responsible to change the system that makes one complicit in evil.

It may be impossible to unplug completely from an evil system. Or even if it is possible, it may render one completely incapable of changing the system. One might have to withdraw from society completely and live under a bridge. But if everyone who became aware of the evils of our system simply dropped out to save his own soul from further culpability, the system would only be strengthened. But the highest imperative is not to maintain the goodness of one’s own soul. The highest imperative is to fight the evil of the system. Thus one should stay plugged into the system, regardless of the personal costs, and do everything one can to change it. And provided that one actually is working to change it, one incurs no more bad karma.

The weakest sense of “fault” is simply a vulnerability, an Achilles heel. Everybody has weaknesses. They are not immoral per se. But how one deals with one’s weaknesses is a moral issue. Specifically, if one is aware of one’s weaknesses and how they can be used by others to further evil ends, one has the responsibility to stop it.

7. The guiltiest whites are the powerful politicians, businessmen, and intellectuals who handed control of our destiny over to Jews. Somewhat less guilty are powerful whites who are products of the current system and who work with non-whites to promote anti-white policies: affirmative action, racial integration, non-white immigration, multiculturalism, globalization, miscegenation, white guilt, etc. These people deserve punishment.

8. Of course, crimes of commission are worse than the crimes of omission. But the fact remains that powerful whites who simply do nothing to halt white dispossession are more culpable than powerless ones.

9. For people in power, ignorance of how long-term trends affect their people is no excuse, because part of their responsibility is to know about such things. They ought to know better.

10. Most whites are relatively powerless. We are merely along for the ride. But most powerless whites still share the universalistic, altruistic, anti-ethnocentric values of the whites who are actively selling us out. Many others share the cynical, selfish, individualistic, devil-take-the-hindmost values of those who actively betray us merely for money and power.

White traitors would be far fewer if their actions were viewed as evil by the majority of the white community. Thus all whites who share the values that promote white genocide also share a small degree of complicity.

11. But what of whites who reject white genocide and the values that promote it? One cannot redeem oneself merely by rejecting deadly ideas, for if one stands by and does nothing to stop them, one is still a bit culpable for the outcome.

12. Worse still are those who know full well the perils that our race faces and decide to “do something,” but then do something counterproductive. It is better to do nothing, than to do something counter-productive. Of course serious men disagree about what is productive. But there are better and worse ways to conduct disputes. And the deeper problem is that we lack serious men to begin with. But if one grasps the full peril of the situation, there is simply no margin for buffoonery.

13. Since all whites at one time or another fall into the above categories, we are all — to widely varying degrees — culpable for our racial decline. All whites bear some responsibility, although whites as a whole do not bear full responsibility.

But once one understands one’s mistakes and learns how to avoid them in the future, there is no point in dwelling on the past. Our goal as White Nationalists should be to bear no further culpability for our ongoing genocide. And the way to do that is: (1) to understand the problem to its roots, (2) to reject all the causes of our predicament, and (3) to actively work for our race’s salvation. Until you do that, you remain part of the problem.

There are different ways to work for our race’s salvation. You decide your own level of explicitness and involvement, and the rest of us will accept that. But whatever you do, make sure that it counts, then do it to be best of one’s ability. You must do your duty, and your first duty is to determine what that duty is.

14. But it is not just the case that whites, individually, are more or less culpable in our own genocide. For genocide is not just a matter of individuals. It is also a matter of the system. The liberal, democratic, capitalist system alone is conducive to white genocide, even without Jewish involvement.

Jewish power and influence have a long history. But present-day Jewish hegemony is a relatively recent phenomenon. It was certainly well-advanced when the Jewish cabal around Woodrow Wilson delivered the United States into World War I. Yet the Jewish lobby was defeated in 1924 by immigration restrictionists. But beginning with the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jewish hegemony was firmly established, and Jews have moved from victory to victory.

It is fair to say that Jews are the primary architects, organizers, defenders, and beneficiaries of this anti-white genocidal system. But if Jews built the superstructure, whites laid the foundations long before the rise of Jewish hegemony.

White capitalists promoted wave after wave of immigration of increasingly heterogeneous white and non-white stocks in order to gain advantages over the native-born working class. (The vast majority of American Jews came here as immigrants, drawn by the anti-national, anti-racial logic of capitalism.)

White businessmen bought black slaves and hired Chinese coolies rather than pay white workers living wages. (The fact that Jews were among the sellers of slaves is immaterial. They could not have sold them if nobody was buying.)

The white universalism, egalitarianism, and racial altruism that sustain the system are entirely alien to Judaism. Their roots lie in Greek natural law philosophy, Christianity, and Enlightenment liberalism. These values led Americans to fight a bloody and devastating Civil War largely over black slavery long before the rise of Jewish hegemony.

As Patrick Buchanan points out in Suicide of a Superpower, the materialistic values of liberal democracy have led to declining fertility in every first world country, including Israel and Asian countries, which lack hostile Jewish elites. If you combine this system with the racial egalitarianism and altruism and non-white immigration that existed in America before Jewish hegemony, one arrives at pretty much the same system that is killing us today. In other words, the present American system could conceivably have developed along essentially the same lines, even if Jews had never set foot on our shores.

This means that if the Jews suddenly departed tomorrow, but the capitalist system and universalist, egalitarian values remained in place, our race would still be on the path to extinction. Thus we need to do more than merely separate ourselves from other races. We also need to get to the deepest roots of the problem: the moral, political, and economic weaknesses that Jews are exploiting so effectively.

15. We are not, however, entitled to ignore reality just because it could have been different. And the reality we face is the rule of a hostile Jewish elite promoting genocide against whites. Jews are not the only members of our ruling coalition, but they are the senior partners who determine the overall direction of the system and have subordinated it to their ethnic interests. All other groups in the ruling coalition – environmentalists, labor unions, feminists, homosexuals — have to take a back seat when their interests conflict with the Jewish agenda of white genocide.

16. Furthermore, Jews are the primary guardians of the present system. Even if one wishes to criticize and change this system without mentioning Jews, as soon as one presents a credible challenge, one will find oneself opposed by Jews acting as Jews to secure their collective interests. Sometimes we do not get to choose our enemy because our enemy chooses us. Ultimately, there is no way for whites to regain control of our destiny without explicitly naming and fighting Jewish power. As Alex Linder said, there’s no way out but through the Jews.

17. Assigning blame to whites does not in any way lessen Jewish culpability. If I foolishly walk into a black neighborhood and get murdered, my folly does not lessen the assailant’s guilt. It does not transform homicide into suicide and absolve the killer of his crime. Likewise, due to white weaknesses, follies, and vices, the organized Jewish community is now committing genocide against our race. But that does not alter the facts: whites are not committing suicide; we are the targets of genocide.

18. Blaming whites for our present plight is analogous to a doctor treating lung cancer with a stern lecture about the necessity of quitting smoking. Yes, smokers are responsible for their cancers. But assigning blame is not the same thing as a cure. Once one already has cancer, it is too late to change one’s lifestyle to prevent it. One must first excise the tumor. Then, if one survives the operation, one can work on the necessary lifestyle changes to make sure the cancer does not return.

Yes, whites are in large part responsible for our plight. We are suffering from bad leadership, bad values, and an ethnocidal political and economic system that has made us vulnerable to race-replacement and a takeover by a hostile Jewish elite. We’ll work on those problems. But first we need to cut out the cancer that’s killing us. We need to regain control of our destiny and separate ourselves from other races. Then, if we survive, we can work on creating a new system that ensures that this will never happen again.

Published: April 12, 2012

http://www.counter-currents.com/2012/04/our-fault/

Last edited by Alex Linder; June 19th, 2012 at 08:03 PM.
 
Old July 26th, 2012 #73
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[part of comment from dixiegirl at OD]

Obviously, freedom from oppressive government is of no interest to many.

They want “free” health care, “free” housing, “free” education (just start READING books, for God’s sake; you can do it yourself), etc—-

Isn’t that what a slave is? A complete state dependent?


It sure would be nice if more WN thought this way, but we have too many socialists.
 
Old July 28th, 2012 #74
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[from Majority Rights]

“Mulatto supremacism” is their exploitative aim..

“White Women for Sale!”

Very nice. Mongrel supremacist works too. Nice counterpoint when charged with white supremacism.
 
Old July 30th, 2012 #75
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[from OD comments]

Jennifer says:
July 30, 2012 at 11:36 pm

Here is the line I used to draw them in:

It is “racist” and “nazi” to want white people to continue to exist.

As soon as they object to this, they are hooked in and will lose.
 
Old August 6th, 2012 #76
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

When Charles Jencks famously stated that modernity died in 1973 when the towers were destroyed, what he really meant was that utopian visions of multiracial paradise died. Except he couldn’t say that in polite company and expect to keep his career.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.
Page generated in 0.15472 seconds.