Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 1st, 2008 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

[This will be an updated, stickied thread of the best LTEs/snippets from paleocon and other non-White Nationalist media]
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

[from Takimag]

"Conservatism” has been great for the Davos crowd. Aside from the outright destruction of the United States, they have gotten almost everything they have wanted over the past several decades: liberalization of financial markets from the meager restraints imposed on them, the WTO, a drastic expansion of “free trade,” evisceration of unions, open borders, etc.

“Conservatives” rail against government when 100% of the poison pulsating through our culture comes out of the private sector. Capitalism has produced a level of cultural degeneracy in the USA without peer in all of world history. How many niches of pornography do we have in the USA? Gay, interracial, bestiality, tranny, teen, obese, elderly, scat - there’s a thriving market for it all.

In America, homosexuals have the “freedom” to parade around our cities (in Massachusetts they can get married), women have the “freedom” to have abortions, negroes are “free” to knock up teenage white girls. Sluts like Britney Spears and Lohan, thugs like Jay Z and Lil’ Wayne, white trash like Kid Rock are role models.

Conservatives and liberals have reached a consensus that all of this is fine. They call it “freedom of the individual” and “tolerance” and “human rights.” The only value sacred to them is indifference to all the scum running wild in America.

We’re supposed to believe that Iran, Germany, Japan, Russia, South Africa, the American South ... whatever Hitler-of-the-Month the media conjurs up are the bad guys and America is everything great and wonderful. The whole world should aspire to be like us. Everyone who ever lived before the baby boomers were hopelessly backward.

No thanks. I can’t imagine a society that could possibly be more degenerate than contemporary America. Well, aside from the Netherlands. I don’t believe in liberal democracy. I don’t see “conservatism” as being an alternative to it either.
Posted by Prozium on Feb 01, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

"Civil rights” = a movement built by non-Whites, i.e., people who are genetically Jewish, especially Emanuel Celler: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=2570
Posted by J.R. on Feb 01, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

Adrianna,

You give Martin Luther King and his followers way too much credit. The Civil Rights Movement kicked off in 1955 with the Montgomery Bus Boycott. The U.S. Supreme Court had struck down racial segregation in public schools the year before in the Brown decision. The controversy that followed was caused by the failure of Southern state governments to enforce federal court orders. The Supreme Court had already struck down the white primary and segregation in public accommodations in several other decisions before Brown.

The American establishment decided to rid itself of Jim Crow for its own reasons. Both major political parties were committed to “civil rights reform” by 1948. Truman desegregated the military that very same year. The end of segregation was preordained before White America had ever heard of Martin Luther King.

Betty (Goldstein) Friedan published The Feminine Mystique in 1963 - a year before the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Her radicalism was in no way caused by an obscure black preacher from Georgia. Friedan had been a radical for decades before the triumph of the Civil Rights Movement.

The common thread that runs from civil rights to feminism to abortion to gay liberation to the progressive left of 2008 is not Jim Crow. Rather, it is the inclusion of your co-ethnics in United States and their attraction to subversive political movements.

Everyone in America knows what the “Christian Right” is and that it has a discernible political agenda. To identify and oppose the “Jewish Left,” however, is to be branded an “anti-Semite” or something much worse and excluded from polite company.
Posted by Prozium on Feb 01, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #5
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

The United States is not a nation in any sense of the word. Americans no longer share the same language, religion, ancestry, history, or political beliefs. The USA is a “dollar country.” Various tribes and rootless individuals from around the world have decamped here to pursue economic opportunity. The only common threads that hold America together are militarism and materialism. The sooner this farce is tossed in the dustbin of history the better. You can join Adrianna in Aztlan.
Posted by Prozium on Feb 01, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

Hey Sid, that’s Mr. Momak to you. If I was a female, it would be stara momica , or maybe stara kokica . But I wouldn’t expect you to understand that—in my experience most ‘conservative’ multiculturalists are strangely lacking in actual knowledge of other cultures and languages.

At any rate, we should have the type of ‘economic crisis’ that Japan has. A crowded (with Japanese) island with no resources still manages to run huge balance of payments surpluses with us, build factories on American soil, on the bleeding edge of robot technology (precisely because they want to remain Japanese).

Here is another ‘xenophobic’ country that is kicking butt, Germany.

http://www.newsweek..com/id/91613/page/1

If you read the article, there is the usual MSM call—but they need more immigrants! In other words, the MSM can’t seem to fathom, as Sid can’t, that cultural homogeneity and even labor ‘shortages’ can be a good thing. And strangely, for all their Turks, the German insistence on an ethnic identity has keep those people from rioting, bombing. Unlike the French ‘assimilationists” and the British multiculturalists.

Sid, you might want to take a look at two ‘emerging’ powers, China and Japan. How many Jamaicans, Pakistanis, Turks, in any of those countries. India allows immigration—if you are brown (but not a Paki or Bangladeshi), as Peter Brimelow has shown. You can try this at home—google ‘India’ and “Person of Indian Origin Visa”.
Posted by stari_momak on Feb 01, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

Race accounts for 90%+ of Obama’s appeal to white liberals. There is nothing about his policies remarkable enough to explain the support his candidacy has generated. He makes nothing but grandiose promises about “hope” and “change” without detailing specifics.

Obama is so attractive to progressives because he presents himself as the herald of the liberal rapture — the fantasy colorblind utopia — which we have been hearing about ad nauseum since the 1960s. If Obama does win the presidency, he is likely to be a tragic figure. He’s a charlatan who will disappoint after riding to power on a wave of wildly inflated expectations.

Black political power has been tried all over America in our inner cities. It has been tried in Haiti and throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Is that “change we can believe in”? Unfortunately, facts have never been allowed to stand in the way of millenarianism.
Posted by Prozium on Jan 31, 2008.
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

[WND]

No to Newt

Newt Gingrich, like Fred Thompson and John McCain, is a bogus conservative. He is, and has been for many years, a member in good standing of the Council on Foreign Relations, an organization whose sole purpose is to institute neo-fascist global government – the New World Order Daddy Bush so proudly proclaimed back in 1991. Like Baby Bush, Gingrich as president would use his cover as a conservative to help push us over the brink.

Michael R. Oberndorf
 
Old February 1st, 2008 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

Where's the character, America?

[To Joseph Farah:] Excellent article, but practically impossible. The elections are as orchestrated as a WWF wrestling match. We have no real choice. There are no Americans left in the mix; all are variations on Stalin.

The only way to get America back is the way we got it in the first place: by killing the tyrants that seek to control us. That, of course, will not happen because Americans no longer have the strength of character to act in such a bold way.

I have been reading WND for a few years now and love it. You and David Kupelian are right on the money.

Larry
 
Old February 2nd, 2008 #10
John in Woodbridge
Senior Member
 
John in Woodbridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,749
John in Woodbridge
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The United States is not a nation in any sense of the word. Americans no longer share the same language, religion, ancestry, history, or political beliefs. The USA is a “dollar country.” Various tribes and rootless individuals from around the world have decamped here to pursue economic opportunity. The only common threads that hold America together are militarism and materialism. The sooner this farce is tossed in the dustbin of history the better. You can join Adrianna in Aztlan.
Posted by Prozium on Feb 01, 2008.
Something I was thinking about. Not to get into the politics of WWII, but you can see how the country galvanized when the country was 95 percent white. Now, the US is really a number of nations and each nation (tribe) is warring against each other. While the tribes still have their own territories to a degree, since integration it's pretty much hand-to-hand combat and guerrilla warfare.
__________________
It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood
 
Old February 4th, 2008 #11
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

To my knowledge, “conservative” wasn’t a part of the American political lexicon until the mid-twentieth century. The state’s rights ideology has a much older lineage, but it was associated with the Southern Democrats who bolted the New Deal coalition over LBJ’s support for the Civil Rights Act of 1964. My ancestors didn’t call themselves “conservatives.” They were segregationists, racialists, “State’s Rights Democrats.” A weak central government for them was necessary to ward off a Northern dominated federal government from interfering in Dixie’s unique social system.

I’m no expert on the subject, but I want to say that “conservative” was popularized by William F. Buckley’s National Review during the 1950s. “Conservative” was an established political tendency within the GOP by the time of Barry Goldwater’s presidential campaign in 1964. “Conservatives” were people who believed in small government and low taxes. Goldwater would later become notorious for his opposition to the “social conservatives” (newly minted) who defected to the GOP from the Democratic Party.

“Conservatism” used to be synonymous with “classical liberal.” American conservatives were people who disagreed with FDR’s revision of liberalism in the wake of the Great Depression. They wanted to return to an earlier version of liberalism which was averse to using government as a tool to redistribute wealth ("reform liberals” came to believe that concentrated economic power was a threat to personal liberty and equality).

James Newland is correct to distinguish between American conservatism and European conservatism. “Conservative” was a dirty word in liberal America until the 1950s/1960s. It was generally associated with “reactionary.” In America, “conservatism” is merely a species of liberalism whereas in Europe it is more closely identified with religion, monarchy, custom, etc. European conservatives don’t believe that “freedom” and “equality” are the highest goods.

There has never been a European style “conservatism” in America to stand in the way of the progress of liberalism. There were, however, illiberal tendencies within the American mainstream that traditionally acted to restrain this ideology. First and foremost amongst these was racialism. Racial identity took an importance in the United States unique in the Western world. Religion was another restraining force. A weaker since of ethnic identity also once put the brakes on liberalism.

No more. The significance of the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s is that all the non-liberal elements of Americanism were finally expunged from our national identity. We are united by nothing other than our allegiance to liberal ideology. Americans no longer share the same ancestry, history, culture, or religion. “Conservatives” have endorsed this consensus. For conservatives, to be an American is nothing more than having U.S. citizenship and believing in “principles” like non-discrimination. We are an ideological nation like the Soviet Union now.

Conservatives like Zmirak wonder why our culture has become so debased. The answer is that Americanism is nothing but liberalism. Conservatism is liberalism - which explains its exhaustion. We are racing forward to the final dénouement when our standard of living collapses and whites become a minority in America.

Let’s see how popular “conservatism” remains then.
Posted by Prozium on Feb 03, 2008.
 
Old February 9th, 2008 #12
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default Re: Best of Paleocon Media (and other non-WN)

I never said I was a “conservative.” Conservatives are people who would rather have 1 billion non-whites settle in Europe and North America than be accused of “racism.”
Posted by Prozium on Feb 07, 2008.
 
Old February 25th, 2008 #13
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Jew Gottfried:

Once again I feel impelled to respond to my critics, and particularly to those who criticize me as a “Zionist,” and as someone who worships at the altar of America the “superpower,” and endorses “unconstitutional wars,” being carried out against the will of the American people. If my respondent means by “Zionist” that I have kind feelings toward the Israelis and would not want to see their Arab neighbors destroy them, I shall have to plead guilty.

http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article/some_responses



Dr. Gottfried:

Two facts stand in the way of your argument (trying to distance the Israelis from the “neocons") having any credibility:

1. The “Clean Break” and “Project for a new American Century” documents were prepared for Netnyahoo and the Israeli Govt. and were only put into the implementation phase after Israel’s govt blessed this approach to “greater Israel”

It follows that the war in Iraq and the planned war on Iran are to implement this Israeli agenda. The day to day “autonomy” of the neocons only proves they are all working for the pre-approved “strategic plan” as described in these 2 documents.

2. Never in History has a civilian population so eagerly participated in the ethnic cleansing and aparthied against the Palestinians as the Israeli public. Whether it is land grabbing or chopping down olive trees or stealing water and livestock or simply torturing the Palestinians, the Israeli public are its gory participants.

Even the german public could plead “ignorance” but the Universal conscript army of the Israelis proves that everyone is involved in the project to reduce another people to the status of imprisoned animals.

I wonder how come you never visit Gaza, can it be the same psychology that prevented Germany’s leaders from visiting the concentration camps, so the do not have to see what they are responsible for?

How come you never write about the injustices being perpetuated by 1 million neo Nazi Russian racialist against the jews, christians and the Palestinians? Enough Said!

Posted by Ali Khan on Feb 21, 2008.


The Israelis are now losing their
better educated and relatively mobile population,
which does not want to live any longer in an armed
camp with narrow borders.

Posted by paul gottfried on Feb 21, 2008.



Liberal democracy is nothing to crow about. It enthrones ignorance at the expense of intelligence. It holds public policy captive to crude media driven popularity contests. Why is democracy considered such a great system of government? Imagine the sort of chaos “democracy” would create if we ran the medical profession that way. Instead of licensing qualified professionals, we could elect physicians on the basis of their ability to raise large sums of money, look good on television, and flatter idiots by giving lip service to their favorite myths. Charlatans would quickly run wild again. People would lose their lives and money from malpractice. It is only the field of government where incomptence is not considered a disqualifier for higher office.

Posted by Prozium on Feb 23, 2008.




The West managed to get by just fine without democracy for a thousand years. What is the alternative to liberal democracy? To be perfectly honest with you, I really don’t care. Nothing could possibly be worse than the sick, degenerate, materialistic farce of a culture we have today which holds up 50 Cent and Britney Spears as role models. It doesn’t even have the will to reproduce itself! If that were not bad enough, these democratic politicians are literally giving our lands away to alien settlers.

I’m going to go out on a limb and say that I would rather have Communism or Zmirak’s theocracy than that. As for my own ideal, I think government should be run like any other profession, so my ideal is a sort of caste based technocracy. I would be for republicanism provided it doesn’t degenerate into democratic conditions. Is a military coup too much to hope for? Whatever it takes to haul these f****** politicians before a firing squad has my support. A boot stomping on Larry Kudlow’s face for a thousand years for a thosuand years sounds nice. What do you think?

Posted by Prozium on Feb 23, 2008.
 
Old March 5th, 2008 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default


Alexander Cockburn on William F. Buckley, Jr.:


"I found him mostly unwatchable and unreadable, being 97 per cent predictable and disgusting in all his views, with a style intolerably loaded with affectation -- fake English urbanity and pompous usage. He was the sort of writer who could never use the word 'punishment' without sticking 'condign' in front of it, the better to flaunt his stylistic credentials."

"Buckley wore urbanity like cheap make-up, badly applied. At the slightest challenge it disappeared and we were left with the hiss and venom of a true reptile."
 
Old March 5th, 2008 #15
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Ron Paul and Raw Milk
Posted by Lew Rockwell at 03:18 PM

Writes Daniel: "RP spoke today before the annual lobby day of the National Independent Consumers and Farmers Association here on the Hill. They are the group that wants government to stay out of their business. It was an enormous success. It was standing room only, with Amish organic farmers sharing space with Capitol Hill staffers and local farm advocates. The room was full of local farm products and unpasteurized milk and milk products, delicious farm-made meats and sausages, artisan breads. As soon as RP walked in, there was a hush across the crowd. He was introduced by the great local farm guru Joel Salatin to an enthusiastic standing ovation that was so ferocious that it surprised RP. He spoke near a large Ron Paul chocolate sculpture that an artisan chocolatier had crafted for the occasion. His speech was interrupted several times by loud applause and when he finished his message of self-reliance and government non-interference, there was another extended standing ovation. Another Congressman followed him and remarked at how difficult it was to follow Ron Paul. You could tell: half the room cleared out when RP left. What is interesting about the speech of the Member who followed RP is that several times he emphasized that he was 'just like Ron Paul' on this or that issue. That would NEVER have happened before this past year’s events. Members would have gone out of their way to say how different they were from him. Now the opposite is true. And most of his applause lines were when he emphasized how like Ron Paul he is. What a great event! With gallons of that demon raw milk that the government doesn’t want you to have!"
 
Old March 14th, 2008 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[LTE to WSJ}

Free Speech and Islam: Questioning Assumptions
March 4, 2008; Page A15

In "Free Speech and Radical Islam" (Feb. 15), Flemming Rose unwittingly assumed the role of the German officer he mentioned when he allowed the malicious cartoons to be published. This obviously and predictably would enrage millions of Muslims around the world. His concern about free speech is disingenuous.

He clearly gives a free hand to insult Islam and Muslims by neglecting to point out, based on his logic, that it would be equally allowable to ridicule the Holocaust or depict a figure of Martin Luther King containing a caption with the "N" word. I doubt he would allow that, as well he shouldn't. If he strictly follows his own logic, why didn't he point out that there are laws in Europe prohibiting opinions denying the Holocaust, or that the U.S. news media refrain from using derogatory terms for African-Americans as a form of censorship?

Muslim nations and much of the former colonialist West, to be sure, have a formidable task in dealing with radicalized elements of the faith. Mr. Rose's actions are part of the problem. Perhaps even more disturbing is that the omissions from his discussion are those expected from one with prejudice rather than from one seriously dedicated to free speech.

Sid Nassri
Orangeburg, S.C.
 
Old March 17th, 2008 #17
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

In 1917, the United States entered the First World War. The ostensible reason for embroiling U.S. armed forces in that conflict was the secret alliance that Germany proposed with Mexico in which the American Southwest would be returned to that country in the event of a victory by the Central Powers. 126,000 Americans died in that war, 234,300 were wounded. Men were sent into the trenches, through barbed wire, and died of asphyxiation from poison gas to thwart this ambition of the Kaiser.

Not that any of this matters to John Zmirak. His relatives probably fought on the other side. But, there are some of us in America whose ancestors knew George Washington and Robert E. Lee, and we have some concerns about what is happening to our nation. I don’t have any stories to recount about ethnic immigrant neighborhoods in New York City. I have never been there. My folks were the pioneers. We built this country before the Zmiraks of the world could speak English.

Which brings me to my point: who needs foreign enemies when you have conservatives? Saddam Hussein had neither the ambition or the power to slice and dice the U.S. economy and ship it off to China. I don’t think Josef Stalin was enamored with gay marriage. He probably would have frowned upon hip hop and rock n’ roll, amongst other things, as “bourgeois decadence.” There were laws against that stuff in the USSR. Radios were jammed to keep the contagion out. Milosevic didn’t care a wit about California or Arizona. Poor Hitler, he would have laughed at political correctness. The Führer was an admirer of the Confederacy. A threat to U.S. interests? Insofar as he thought about North America at all, he thought it would be a good idea to rid the United States of the forces that were tearing it down, and we must admit that history has shown he was right.

Zmirak has been reduced to recycling textbook neocon canards: we had an interest in propping up French imperialism in Indochina (nope, that reasoning led to the Vietnam War, which we lost), foreigners are immoral (channelling George W. Bush and Paul Wolfowitz here), we had a stake in the Philippines (we turned out the lights there in the 1990s), we had to save Britain from the Nazis (they were the ones who attacked Germany, and could have ended the war at any moment), we had to stop Hitler and Stalin from going to war (umm, our intevention did not stop the war on the Eastern Front), we had to stop the Bolsheviks (no, we were their allies), Stalin’s atrocities were in the past (Hitler’s lashing out at the Jews was directly caused by losing the war), we have to prop up liberal democracies (why?), we had to win the Cold War (this is what you call victory, half of American children being nonwhite?)

That is how the conservative operates. Point the finger at the demonic immoral foreigner, exaggerate the threat he poses, obsfucate your real interests in a cloud of squid ink. It is the textbook Bush/Rove/McCain strategy. DON’T pay any attention to the invariable ways in which conservatives are robbing you, the future that they are leaving behind for your children, or their cowardice, non-solutions, and lack of interest in solving America’s problems.

Too bad for them that the amount of sand they can throw in your eyes is limited. Reality has a way of breaking through to the surface. Tune into Wall Street today and you will see what I mean.
Posted by Prozium on Mar 17, 2008.

I have some good news to report. Today on Wall Street we had the first of the impending major bank failures with the virtual collapse of Bear Stearns. Not even $400 billion dollars in corporate welfare from the Federal Reserve has thawed the credit crunch. The day is fast approaching when America will sink into the Bush Depression. When that happens, Americans are going to work themselves up into a furious rage, possessed by the single thought that “these people have done it again,” and they will cast “conservatism” down into the same fiery bottomless hole that Herbert Hoover and the GOP into in 1932. That will be the magic moment when “spectre of the Browns” becomes a very real possibility.
Posted by Prozium on Mar 14, 2008.



John Zmirak,

You wrote the following:

“Why is it, exactly, that everything I write--even if it’s about local politics in 1980s Queens--somehow ends up sparking a debate about the dead, evil ideology of fascism? What is going on here, people?”

Because our generation is witness to a measure of cultural degeneracy that previous generations would have found incomprehensible.

People are beginning to reconsider the possibility of racial nationalism because they can see no other way for our culture to reassert itself. The conservatives have failed and those who followed them are slowly becoming more radicalized.
Posted by Tom T on Mar 15, 2008.

[You know that jew comedian line: I got...nothing! Thatz exactly where the conservatives are were and will always be. WE have it, and it is coming.]


Zmirak has no rebuttal to my point that abortion was illegal when racialists controlled America. On the contrary, legalized abortion coincided with the rise of conservatism. In fact, come to think of it, so did almost every form of degeneracy that comes to mind.
Posted by Prozium on Mar 16, 2008.

[Prozium is the dominant commentator at Takimag, even though he is not an official poster, but a response poster]
 
Old March 17th, 2008 #18
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Another thread, with a wise poster named Brutus...

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=534#comments

You can see that the paleocons' readers are open to the truth, if not the paleocons themselves.
 
Old March 17th, 2008 #19
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

51Haywood Hale

It has long been a ploy of the corporate Jewish media in the U.S. which is anti-Christian and anti non-Jews to use the racism card oversensitively - in its domination of the media - so as to splinter America into camps or groups largely antagonistic toward, due to the spin in the media, the white Christian majority. There is no denying this unless one is to deny history. However precisely due to mainstream media domination one reading this perhaps for the first time would wonder if it was actual or not, or worse if I in simply telling the truth weren’t also “anti-Semitic.” That’s a much worse thing to be of course thanks to the media spin for the past 50 years, than if one were anti-Christian or anti-European etc. This cosncious ploy or strategem in dominating the media and oversensitizing so-called racial matters becomes a powerful polemic favoring the Jewish camp or tribe, obviously, at the expense of non-Jews. Jews cannot argue that they have melted into the American pot or stew since they continue to identify themselves as a blood group in everything, including insisting on referring to themselves as ‘Jewish Americans’ in that order. While at the same time, when it suits them, ‘preaching’ cosmopolitanism and so-called universalism (for others.)

*Obama’s preacher’s remarks came to light now for the first time since he apparently denounced Israel and the U.S. as state sponsors of terrorism. Israel against the Palestinian people whose land they have stolen and want to continue stealing, and the U.S. for being a mean Empire with its troops in 140 countries around the world. And a nation recently which invaded and destroyed another nation Iraq like a Nazi Germany might have invaded Poland when it was not attacked first by said nation it invaded. If these travesties don’t make us ‘terrorists’ what are we? WHAT ARE WE?

I recall one of the more self-serving economic arguments for the invasion of Iraq. I.e. “We must invade Iraq [or] oil will be over $100 per barrel.” … Actually at the time I translated that warning this way: “We must invade Iraq [so] oil will be over $100 per barrel.” And in my own mind that of course was the Standard Oil argument for the war. Standard Oil [i.e. Exxon’s] profits have never been higher than today and oil is over $100 per barrel. But they were just going along for the ride with the more powerful Jewish Lobby in the U.S. known as AIPAC which perceived Iraq as a threat to Israel’s desire for complete hegemony in the Middle East. The Jewish Lobbies in behalf of Israel are worldwide. But that’s the real reason Obama is in trouble suddenly [in] the U.S. MEDIA which SETS the nation’s agenda, for what his preacher said putting Israel’s and our policies honestly in the light.

Of course Obama has to play the game and respond in MEDIA speak to these attacks starting with Gerry Ferraro who served as point to get the ball rolling whether it was unwittingly or not. After which the Clintons prisoners of the mainstream MEDIA as well and who have to play the game can only sit back and see if it is helpful to their own ambitions for political power here in the U.S. or perhaps not. The Jewish MEDIA machine starting with the New York Times have endorsed Hillary since she is perceived as more dependable a lacky for Israel than Obama may prove to be. Although now Obama has denounced his own preacher - to win favor in the eyes of the Jewish Media Machine. That’s who or what he has to appease if he is to remain a viable candidate for President.

Consider the following in the U.K. as well:

“Neo-Lefties, the Second Boot of the Jewish Lobby”
-by Bob Finch
www.israelshamir.net

The British Jewish lobby in Britain has been intimidating anyone in the country who criticizes, let alone condemns, the illegal state in Palestine and its racist warmongering policies. The same is true in America as it is in the rest of the western world. The greater the social status, media prominence, or political position, of those criticizing the Jewish apartheid state, the greater the Jewish intimidation perpetrated against them.

(continue reading at the above link)

before you do-?-Do you still actually deny this even to yourself?


PCR was once an immigration restrictionist, a leading critic of “affirmative action,” and even somewhat of a race realist who often defended whites in general and white men in particular from the lies and hatreds of anti-white leftists and cultural Marxists. He also wrote many articles on false accusations, wrongful convictions, and malicious prosecutions -usually in cases of child sexual abuse.

Then George W. Bush invaded Iraq and Roberts joined forces with the leftists he once despised and became a featured columnist at CounterPunch. Since that time, unsurprisingly, he hasn’t written a “politically-incorrect” word about race or even immigration.

Most depressing by far, however, was his total silence on the Duke rape hoax abomination, arguably the most horrifying subversion of due process and presumption of innocence since the interfamilial “sex-ring” and “mass-molestation” day care withhunts of the 1980s and early 90s.

The pre-9-11 PCR would have written 10-20 articles on this sickening travesty.
 
Old August 21st, 2008 #20
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,338
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

I Resign From the Mont Pelerin Society

by Paul Craig Roberts

I have come to the conclusion that the Mont Pelerin Society is no longer an effective force for freedom, becoming instead another tool in behalf of US hegemony, ringing Russia with US military bases and puppet governments in the name of "supporting democracy." As far as I am aware, the MPS has not addressed the Bush administration's assault on US civil liberties or the disrespect the Bush administration has shown for the US Constitution and international law, particularly the Geneva Conventions. Nor has the society taken exception to US wars of aggression in behalf of undeclared agendas.

I don't see how the society can function in behalf of liberty when its long-time Treasurer is so closely associated with the Republican Party, now thoroughly neoconized. The alacrity with which the Heritage Foundation jumped on the Bush administration's propaganda bandwagon about "the Russian invasion of Georgia" epitomizes the new association of "freedom" with American hegemony.

As Secretary of State Rice put it (according to Matthew Lee, AP News, August 18, 16:17 EST), "'We are not going to allow Russia to draw a new line at those states that are not yet integrated into the trans-Atlantic structures', she said, referring to Georgia and Ukraine, which have not yet joined NATO or the European Union but would like to."

But, of course, the US and its NATO allies are going to draw a line around Russia.

What does the Caucasus have to do with the North Atlantic? Why is NATO, which was created to keep the Soviet Army out of Western Europe, still around almost two decades after the disappearance of the Soviet Union? Why has its membership doubled, and why is it being extended to the Black Sea? Is Mongolia next? The US strategic objective – to ring Russia with bases and puppet states in order to exercise hegemony over Russia – will lead to war, the destruction of liberty and perhaps life on earth. This gratuitously insane neoconservative foreign policy is one that will lead to nuclear war. It stands in total contradiction to the alleged values of the Mont Pelerin Society.

As every great libertarian and the founding members of the MPS acknowledged, war is the greatest enemy of liberty.

The US used force to rip Kosovo out of Serbia and to hand it to Muslim drug runners in exchange for a US military base. The US bombed Serbian civilians and accused the Serbians of war crimes. South Ossetia has been autonomous since the early 1990s from which date Russian and Georgian peacekeepers have been in S. Ossetia. The US puppet president of Georgia attacked S. Ossetian civilians with his American and Israeli trained and equipped army, killing about 2,000 and driving 30,000 into Russia, and the Georgian peacekeepers turned their weapons upon the Russian peacekeepers. The American puppet, installed by the neocon National Endowment for Democracy, committed this war crime in order to ethnically cleanse S. Ossetia of Russians and to end the separatist movement in order to smooth Georgia's entrance into NATO.

The "Russian invasion" was a response to this US-sponsored war crime. No real fact or truthful account can be found in the Heritage presentation or the US media. I do not want to be associated with an organization that is a front for American hegemony and wars based on propaganda, lies, and deceit. If Milton Friedman and F.A. Hayek were still alive, I am certain they would join me in resignation.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.
Page generated in 0.14572 seconds.