|
September 23rd, 2005 | #21 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Liberty Lobbies White Paper.
Find a copy of the liberty lobbies White Paper on the ADL it is most interesting and well documented.
|
September 23rd, 2005 | #22 | |
Retrosexual
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion." - Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist. |
|
September 23rd, 2005 | #23 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/f...on_the_adl.txt ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/SF/SFA/gov/ADL-Whitepaper White Paper on the ADL FOREIGN AGENTS CONTROL YOUR GOVERNMENT (Spotlight Reprint from August 10, 1981) Dual Loyalists Work Against U.S. Interests Liberty Lobby has always advocated a policy of America first in foreign affairs and this has made it the enemy of every alien interest which wishes to manipulate the power of the United States for its own selfish purposes -- purposes not often noble and never in this nation's interests. Thus, Liberty Lobby has been the butt of a sustained smear campaign by the media designed to intimidate potential supporters -- to frighten them off for fear of a similar fate. The main organization orchestrating this malicious barrage of hate has been the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) of B'nai B'rith, and the purpose of this white paper is to analyze the purpose and methods of the ADL. This laudable (not to mention courageous) task becomes all the more important at this time when America stands a hair's-breath away from nuclear war and the ADL is the main culprit leading us into that holocaust. Liberty Lobby deeply resents the fact that America is literally an occupied nation, held in subjection by a foreign government which has seized control of its policy-making apparatus -- a once-great nation without the will to resist or to act independently when the interests of this other nation are involved. It is the purpose of Liberty Lobby to acquaint enough Americans with these facts to cause a political upheaval -- an upheaval which is clearly on the way simply because the facts are so vivid that they can no longer be hidden. Liberty Lobby urges all readers of this white paper to personally contact their congressman and senators to discuss the facts presented below and to demand that the allegations be either confirmed or denied by official investigation. If the ADL is -- as we state -- an unregistered agent of a foreign power then the parties responsible must be indicted and tried for felony violation of American law. Congress can do no less than investigate these serious charges and you have the right and obligation to be sure that it does. Background Most Americans have probably never heard of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). Many of those who have heard of it (including some of its own naive supporters) regard it as nothing more than another in the vast herd of organizations that claim to be promoting brotherhood. Only those who have paid attention to what the ADL is actually doing have a real conception of its nature. The ADL was founded in 1913 by the B'nai B'rith (Sons of the Covenant), a Jewish fraternal organization dating back to 1843. The B'nai B'rith has always publicly represented its own activities as essentially charitable. It is tax-exempt and contributions are tax-deductible. Its creature, the ADL, was allegedly intended to act as a counterforce to anti-Jewish sentiment in the United States. Originally it appeared that the ADL was to be nothing more than a publicity organ of the B'nai B'rith whose purpose was to combat religious prejudice against, and unflattering stereotyping of, the growing number of Jewish immigrants in the United States. It quickly became clear that the ADL had taken to itself a more ambitious role. It would have not only a positive propaganda function; it would also have a "monitoring" or espionage function, along with a suppressive, censoring function whose goal was to prevent anything being heard, read, or seen which was opposed by those who control the ADL. Additionally, the scope of the ADL's protection of the Jews against defamation was defined to include the encouragement of political and social programs and attitudes which would help the Jews (most of whom were arriving from Eastern Europe and were perceived as people of distinctly alien race, tongue, beliefs, and customs) gain more and more power, status, prosperity, and influence. Because the Jews on the whole were "outsiders" working their way up -- as were other immigrants -- the ADL took a stance that was harshly opposed to people who already "belonged," as well as to their opinions, religions, traditions, heroes, institutions, clubs, jokes, scientific theories, and everything else which tended to bind together and stabilize the already-established Americans into a relatively homogeneous cultural and social whole. Secret Report There was an effort to make the ADL's efforts appear more altruistic, and to disguise their true thrust, by creating the appearance of working on behalf of all minorities, for brotherhood in general. A recent proof that such a scheme was consciously contrived by the ADL is found n a secret report entitled "The Proposed B'nai B'rith- Anti-Defamation League Operations in Latin America," written in 1965 by Arnold Forster, who for many years was general counsel of the ADL. Depicting Latin America as a kind of new frontier for development by the ADL, and lamenting only that Latin America Jews are not more unified and more aware of the threat of anti-Semitism, Forster writes on page 46: (Many elements in the Jewish community are convinced "things are good." These people have closed their eyes for many years to existing anti-Semitism, hoping that by doing so it will go away. This group is fearful that public action designed to counter anti-Jewish hostility will "stir things up." They are reluctant to "make waves," attracting attention to themselves. The only way these Jews will be persuaded to join defense efforts is to "dress up" programs with the problems of other ethnic groups, camouflaging the fight for the Jewish minority in an across-the-board fight for all minorities.) Liberty Lobby has a full copy of this amazing blueprint for expansion into South America by exploiting and intensifying social problems. If resentment arose among the established Americans (most of whom were of Northern European descent), then it would be ascribed to selfishness and prejudice; a strong sense of guilt must be inculcated in those who felt the natural responses of pride and self-defense even as the ADL and other Jewish groups worked to increase Jewish pride. If anybody criticized the ADL or the aims and people it supported, then he was an anti-Semite and a danger to democracy. If anybody opposed legislation that would take money, power, or privileges away fro the established Americans and give them to unestablished Americans, he was somebody to be shunned and humiliated on account of his greed and bigotry. Even those who manifested simple patriotism and pride of heritage were ridiculed as "nativists" or attacked as dangerous fanatics. "Nationalism" became a dirty word in the ADL dictionary because of its connotation of white cohesion. Meanwhile the ADL always dealt sympathetically with any ideology -- socialism, communism, internationalism -- which promised to break down the existing leadership of society. That was during the first half of this century. And then came political Zionism -- no longer just a dream of returning all Jews to a single nation of their own, but instead an active process by which Palestine was to be seized by Jews from its Arab owners and turned into a super-nationalistic state with an official religion, to be populated by Jews from all over the world and supported patriotically and financially by those who did not actually go there. What was bad in America was fine in Israel, as far as the ADL was concerned. America needed a "pluralistic" (that is, accommodating every race, religion, and culture) society, while Israel had a monolithic society. America needed a total separation of church and state (no displays of Christmas trees or crosses on public grounds, and no prayers in public schools), while Israel was inseparable from Judaism. The ADL became the instrument of a foreign power following the Zionist policy of terrorism and aggression in Palestine which resulted in the foundation of Israel. ADL leaders are constantly traveling to and from Israel and have frequent communications with Israeli diplomatic personnel in the United States. ADL publications, such as the "ADL Bulletin" and "Facts," are largely devoted to Israeli and Zionist matters. The energy of the ADL is largely focused on stifling criticism of Israel in this country by labeling such criticism "anti-Semitism" and seeking the ruin of any politician or private citizen who dares to say anything against Zionism or Israeli interests. 34 Americans Killed After Israel's planes knowingly attacked the American ship, "USS Liberty," and killed 34 American sailors, the ADL boasted about its success in covering up and distorting the truth about the atrocity. When Liberty Lobby's daily radio program, "This is Liberty Lobby," reported on Israeli military attacks on the Arabs, the ADL called the program anti-Semitic and bigoted and undertook a long and viscous campaign of lies, threats, and economic intimidation to get the program off the air. As all members of Congress know, more than one man of politics has been consigned to private life because he was less than adoring of Israel, or even because he admitted that there is such a thing as a Zionist lobby or a Zionist influence on the American press -- an influence which, less than incidentally, is felt mainly through the ADL. More ominously still, it now appears that Zionist influence in this country is spearheaded by the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, and that the ADL and the openly terrorist Jewish Defense League (JDL) are orchestrated by the Mossad. The ADL maintains a pose of opposition to violence, while the JDL, openly flying the Israeli flag within this country, screams for blood and makes physical assaults on its victims. The same man who loses his job or is denied an office because of the ADL is liable to be beaten up or shot by the JDL. The ADL and the JDL are two horns of the same beast. Methods According to Joseph P. Kamp, Arnold Forster, the long-time general counsel of the ADL, was arrested many years ago for painting swastikas on a synagogue. Much more recently, the Associated Press reported that Irving Rubin, West Coast leader of the JDL, was booked for investigation of using an explosive device in the bombing of the Beth Sar Shalom Religious Center in North Hollywood. This apparently incongruous behavior points up the important fact that the ADL (and the JDL) must have anti-Semitism in order to exist, and they will create the appearance of it if they cannot find it growing in the wild. Zionism is in fact founded on the Zionist's acceptance of anti-Semitism as a natural and unavoidable phenomenon which can be ended only by the movement of Jews to their own homeland. (Herzl, "The Jewish States: An Attempt at a Modern Solution of the Jewish Question," 1943, pp. 19-20; Hertzberg, ed., "The Zionist idea," 1966, p. 49.) As long as most Jews show no inclination to migrate to Israel, the fear of anti-Semitism whipped up by the ADL serves the second useful purpose of garnering tremendous financial and political support for Israel among Jews in America and elsewhere. The scope of the ADL's propaganda efforts would be impossible to detail in a short space. The ADL line is planted in everything from comic books to textbooks, "true confessions" magazines to Christian religious publications. The television series, "Holocaust," was basically an ADL creation and was accomplished by a great outpouring of ADL-orchestrated publicity and a barrage of study guides for use in schools and churches. The same is true, to a lesser extent, of the series "Masada." Without even going into the historical inaccuracies of the two films, their messages can be summed up easily: 1. The Israelis were (are) nicer than all other humans. 2. Jews always are persecuted by unappreciative "gentiles." 3. Israel is Jewish property. 4. Israel is the only hope for Jewish survival. Words and Images To purvey its propaganda the ADL has machined a special set of verbal tools for its unique purposes, just as did the communists, for whom "democracy" means communism and "liquidate" means murder. The ADL vocabulary is designed to make the ADL and its clients look wonderful while making its victims and enemies seem abhorrent. The process begins with the creation of two contrasting images -- one of innocence, kindliness, intelligence, and tolerance, and another as an amalgam of disease, neurosis, insanity, wild-eyed religious fanaticism, mindless hatred, torture, and mass murder, most typically in the form of pogroms medieval and modern. We have all seen the movies, the novels, the comics, the plays, the "musicals," the comedians, the well-tutored teachers, and the endless torrent of television programs which create those ADL-desired images. Love and Hate The lines are drawn as clearly as at any Saturday-night professional wrestling match where the handsome, cleancut athlete in the white cowboy hat confronts the grotesque, slavering mound of blubber that will attempt to annihilate him. The crowds love and hate the images even before the battle of good and evil begins, and once it is established who deserves to be obliterated, the same brutal cheating that draws boos when originated by the monster brings screams of delight when used by the good guy. The ADL places itself and those it represents in the angelic realm of Good. Those who oppose it or displease it are consigned to the demonic kingdom of Evil. The military invasions of the Good are righteous wars of self-defense. Everybody else's wars are wars of aggression. The tortures and prison-murders of the Good are interrogations and accidents. The napalming of civilians and the wiping out of whole villages are "retaliations" or inspiring military victories if carried out by the Good, and deeds of infamy to be memorialized 'ad nauseum' if inflicted by the Evil. When the ADL spreads lies about somebody it is "sharing information about the truth nature" of its victim. If the lies are about an employee, the employer is cautioned about "the effect on community good-will of your keeping such an individual on your payroll after you have been made aware of his true nature." A politician or businessman who is threatened with blackmail if he doesn't fall in line is being "sensitized to Jewish concerns." The expression of views disliked by the ADL is a "spewing forth of bigotry and hate." Such views are "filth," "garbage," "obscene," a "threat to American democracy," and constitute "pollution of the airwaves." Such views "are not legitimate fare," and "have no place on the log of a reputable broadcaster." Certain opinions (i.e., those opposed by the ADL) are not within the constitutional protection of freedom of speech. The Chameleon Anti-Semitism The most favored and most devastating terms in the ADL's arsenal are "anti-Semitism" and its variants. There is, of course, nothing worse than anti-Semitism. It is the greatest evil in the history of the world, and it always "lurks just below the surface of Western civilization ready to burst forth in a new orgy of horror." Just why it should lurk there -- or even what it is -- is rarely discussed, but all good folk must be "ever watchful for its slightest manifestation," and put before all else their efforts to stuff it back under the topsoil when it tries to break out. It is a "deadly virus" which must, along with its carriers, be dealt with like an outbreak of typhoid. Likewise vague, and purposely so, is what constitutes anti-Semitism. It is a wide net that catches many fish. Even a Jew who says the wrong thing -- such as Saul Joftes, for many years an officer of the B'nai B'rith, who said that Israel was controlling the ADL and the B'nai B'rith -- is called an anti-Semite. He is also a "sick individual" who has deteriorated as a result of "severe emotional problems." In order to make criticism of Zionism ineradicably disreputable, the ADL says that anybody other than a Zionist who uses the word "Zionist" is really using a code-word for Jew. Therefore any criticism of Zionism (including Israel, of course), is irrational and obscene and demonic, not to mention anti-Semitic. Furthermore, any criticism of Israel or the ADL is invariably reported by the ADL as "an attack on Israel [or the ADL] and on all Jews," even though there has been no reference direct or indirect to Jews. And no discussion of ADL vocabulary would be complete without mentioning the word for all seasons -- "canard." A canard is a false or unfounded story, and any allegation or report which the ADL does not like is simply dubbed a "canard" and thus disposed of for all time without the need for analysis or discussion. It can be seen that to the ADL language is not so much a means of communication as a means of obfuscation, and that words are used to mislead, to put the truth out of focus, and to avoid confronting real issues. The ADL Attempts to Stifle Freedom of Speech From the earliest years of its history, the ADL has revealed itself to be a self-anointed censor of what should reach the public consciousness in America. One of its main fields of activity is the suppression of views it does not want heard, and, as such, it is the avowed enemy of freedom of speech. The favored method, where it is feasible, is called "quarantine." It simply means that a person or group subject to quarantine is never heard of and never heard from. What he says and does is not reported (except to the ADL), and what he writes is not published. If he is engaged to speak by a club or college or broadcasting station, the ADL sees to it that the speech never takes place. The sponsoring entity is subjected to telephone calls, threatening letters, and visits by delegations of local ADL and B'nai B'rith supporters. If quarantine works, then its victim is rendered, for all practical purposes, voiceless and unable to exert influence except in the most restricted sphere. He is not even attacked. He is a non-person. The concept of quarantine is quite openly discussed in ADL circles as an alternative to actively slandering its enemies. The Washington "Star" of February 10, 1965 reported that Herman Edelsberg, director of the ADL's Washington office, said that members of the "radical right" who could not be persuaded to change their views to conform with the ADL's dogmas should be dealt with by "keeping them in quarantine, until, from tedium, they drop out." No Debate An organization that has been closely linked to the ADL in purpose and in fundraising, the American Jewish Committee, concluded in January, 1960, after a five-year study by Dr. Andhil Fineberg, that an opponent's statements should not be debated because debate would strengthen the opponent's ability to get attention. Those who know him should "privately expose him to opinion molders." Presumably one is exposed if he is called a hatemonger and an anti-Semite in the right private quarters. It may be, however, that some genuine dirt can be dug up, in which case a wider audience is desirable: "... [P]ublicity can be effective where a bigot is concealing facts about himself." (Quoted in Joseph P. Kamp, "The Bigots Behind the Swastika Spree," 1960). A member of the audience at a so-called "Rumor Clinic" presented by Hyman Haves of the ADL's southern California office on February 1, 1950 in Santa Ana, California, reported some of the speaker's remarks in this manner: "Explaining the tactics of the League [ADL], Haves related instances wherein ADL representatives called on editors and radio station owners in cities where opponents were scheduled to speak. he told how these editors and radio station operators were "enlightened and convinced" to give no publicity to the speakers. He described this as the "quarantine or silent treatment" and said it was greatly reducing the audiences of the enemies of the league. "He said boastfully that many ADL opponents "have been cut down" by finding some embarrassing or unpleasant happening in their past and using it against them. Haves said the league found the income of one particular enemy who paid income tax on only $11,000, to be actually $32,000, and said the ADL simply gathered the information and turned it over to the federal government. "You can call these tactics anything you want to," Haves commented. "You can even say smear. We prefer to say education." Silent Treatment Technology A striking instance of the silent treatment technology is found in a letter, dated December 13, 1933, written beneath the letterhead of the Anti-Defamation League, Chicago, Illinois, by Richard E. Gutstadt, director. The letter begins, "To the Publishers of Anglo-Jewish Periodicals," "Gentlemen: "Scribner & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant entitled "The Conquest of a Continent." It is extremely antagonistic to Jewish interests. Emphasized throughout is the "Nordic superiority" theory, and the utter negation of any "melting pot" philosophy with regard to America. "We are interested in stifling the sale of this book. We believe that this can be best accomplished by refusing to be stampeded into giving it publicity. Every review or public criticism of the book of this character brings it to the attention of many who would otherwise know nothing of it. This results in added sales. The less discussion there is concerning it, the more sales resistance will be created. "We therefore appeal to you to refrain from comment on this book, which will undoubtedly be brought to your attention sooner or later. It is our conviction that a general compliance with this request will sound the warning to other publishing houses against engaging in this type of venture." Iron Curtain Over America In 1955 ADL National Chairman Henry Schultz wrote on ADL stationary to Lt.-Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, complaining that the distinguished general had written a letter endorsing John O. Beaty's book, "Iron Curtain Over America," "and recommending it to Americans in general." Schultz then went on to educate Gen. Stratemeyer about the book's author: "Professor Beaty is no newcomer to the field of anti-Jewish propaganda. As long ago as 1948 he was delivering anti-Semitic lectures in the Southwest." Until the publication of "Iron Curtain Over America," Beaty was "irritating only in a local sense." Now he was nationally known, and something had to be done about it. (Exactly what Prof. Beaty had said that was so objectionable was not revealed, of course, and the ADL did not "propose to burden" the general "at this point with our detailed analysis of the book...") The ADL's muscle man then put on the twist in typical heavyhanded, oblique fashion: "In view of the foregoing, it is our feeling that you may want to consider the advisability of some publication which can assure the American people, who hold you in such high regard, that you repudiate religious hatred, as we know you do, and the use of your name by Professor Beaty..." The renowned Air Force general responded, "I forcefully resent what you have said or implied," and stated, "I do not consider that book anti-Jewish in any sense of the word." He continued: "When the United States of America reaches the point where a citizen cannot read what he desires to read and to recommend such reading to others then we will have reached the status that exists in Soviet Russia... As I interpret your letter, your organization would have the people read only what you think should be read and recommended to others. This I resent as a free American citizen. "I do not understand what you mean by your statement, "we do not propose to burden you at this point, etc." Is this a veiled threat to my free expression and thoughts? If so, this I also resent. "Your letter is the most outrageous communication I have ever received in my life and I intend to give it the widest possible publicity, including my many Jewish friends." A somewhat similar incident occurred in 1959, when Gen. Ulysses S. Grant III caused an article called "Abraham Lincoln and the Rothschilds" to be distributed to members of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States. Herman Edelsberg of the Washington, D.C. office of the ADL wrote an insulting letter to Gen. Grant on June 19, 1959, claiming that he had lent his name "to a vile anti-Semitic canard" and "the fabrication of a warped mind." Edelsberg dwelt in an uncomplimentary manner upon the alleged history of the article and its distributors, of course, rather than upon the factual content of the piece, which had to do with the role of international bankers in the American Civil War. Edelsberg ordered the general to "speedily and fully repudiate" the publication. Gen. Grant replied indignantly with a defense of the historical accuracy of the article, and pointed out that it was only Edelsberg and the ADL who had given it "the anti-Jewish twist." "What "the international bankers" of Europe did a century ago to help the Confederacy cannot by any reasonable person be considered a reflection on the many, many good Americans who are Jews, and your efforts to make it seem so is difficult to understand." The ADL pressure continued, with great play in the newspapers -- which tended, as is usually the case with newspapers, to adopt the ADL's language as their own and to describe the article flatly as "anti-Semitic." There was much debate over whether the general had "apologized," but the apology was also an ADL fantasy, and the general never abandoned his guns. |
|
September 23rd, 2005 | #24 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Congressman Gets Treatment
Congressman John G. Schmitz of California received the same kind of treatment in the summer of 1972, after he had written an introduction and endorsement to "None Dare Call It Conspiracy," by Gary Allen. Mr. Allen, like the author of Gen. Grant's article, had spoken of "international bankers." Harvey Schechter of the ADL sent a letter to Congressman Schmitz. "We were distressed to read your introduction to and endorsement of "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" by Gary Allen, and we hereby call upon you to withdraw your endorsement and repudiate this anti-Semitic propaganda book." Congressman Schmitz published the ADL letter along with his own reply in the "Congressional Record" of June 19, 1972. He wrote to Schechter that Schechter's attack on him because of "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" was "one of the most remarkable confirmations of the book's thesis that I have seen," in that Gary Allen had stated that the ADL was used "as an instrument to try to convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds or their allies is an attack on all Jews." Quoting from the book, Congressman Schmitz continued: "Any individual book exploring this subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of ADL committees all over the country. The ADL has never let truth or logic interfere with its highly professional smear jobs. When no evidence is apparent, the ADL, which staunchly opposed so-called 'McCarthyism,' accuses people of being 'latent anti-Semites'." "There is not a word in Gary Allen's book which could possibly be construed by any reasonable man as an attack on any religious faith." Among its other efforts on behalf of American democracy, the ADL attempted to get the Federal Communications Commission to prevent telephone companies from permitting the purveyors of certain ideas from using their recorded message services. The group the ADL had specifically in mind had denounced the Peace Corps and (according to the ADL) called up "lurid visions of a 'communist conspiracy' lurking behind" various groups, including (surprise!) the ADL. (Washington "Post," Sept. 9, 1965.) A few years later the Supreme Court eventually thwarted a prolonged ADL effort to make the FCC take away the license of a radio station which had broadcast an "appeal to prejudice." The ADL had refused a proffered opportunity to broadcast a reply: "A reply, said attorneys for the Jewish service organization, only focuses more attention upon a racial or religious slur, lending it more dignity." The same policy is no doubt useful if one just can't think of a good answer. This is Liberty Lobby The longest and most intense campaign waged by the ADL against a specific group in many years is its continuing war to have the radio program, "This is Liberty Lobby," removed from the airwaves. The ADL's enmity to Liberty Lobby stemmed originally from its general enmity to all nationalist, "rightist" elements in America. The ever-increasing importance of Israel in the ADL program, running up against Liberty Lobby's outspoken advocacy of United States neutrality in the Middle East, as elsewhere abroad, precipitated the ADL "counteraction," as the instigators euphemistically called it. The entire matter is documented by materials, such as internal ADL letters and memoranda, uncovered during a subsequent lawsuit brought by Liberty Lobby. The whole effort was carefully planned, organized, and coordinated at the ADL's national headquarters in New York. Inquiries by Israeli officials in the United States played an important, and perhaps the leading role, in getting the counteraction underway. Not surprisingly, some of the Israeli-ADL correspondence is missing from the materials the ADL was forced to produce during the Liberty Lobby lawsuit, and the one letter that got through was reproduced so poorly that most of it is illegible. It is from the ADL, Boston, to the Israeli Consulate in Boston, and is dated December 24, 1973. The letter begins: "I appreciate your calling my attention to Liberty Lobby broadcast on [station call letters illegible], Boston." The letter continues for two more paragraphs, almost entirely illegible, beginning with the words, "I believe that you are aware of the fact that Liberty Lobby is..." The words "editorial" and "bumper stickers" appear, giving clues of the general trend of the discussion. Copies of the letter were sent to at least eight individuals, most or all of them ADL professional staff. Form Letters Soon radio stations began receiving phone calls and letters of complaint from local people, most of whom (the radio station personnel reported) had apparently never heard the Liberty Lobby program. The letters were almost always parrot renditions of language from ADL "kits" mailed out from New York to regional offices. Packets of "information" about Liberty Lobby were sent to radio stations, and there was an attempt to create the impression that numerous spontaneous complaints were being received about the program by the ADL offices. Advertisers susceptible to ADL and B'nai B'rith influence threatened to withdraw, and in some cases actually did withdraw, their business from stations which would not cancel the Liberty Lobby broadcasts. Meanwhile, as is easily proved by a review of the scripts that were used, there was nothing even remotely anti-Semitic or similarly objectionable in the "This is Liberty Lobby" broadcasts, although there were occasionally comments on Israel. In a letter of December 3, 1973, the chairman of a western broadcasting company wrote to Sheldon Steinhauser of ADL's Denver office referring to complaints about the Liberty Lobby program: "I must, however, in all candor say that upon listening to these programs I have never heard anything which could be classified as an attack upon the Jewish faith or our citizens of that national origin. "It is a rather abrasive attack upon foreign policy in the Near East. It is not, in my opinion, at all different from any other highly controversial opinion, hence we have no intention of censoring it." Courageous Broadcaster On January 16, 1975, an attorney from the Washington, D.C. law firm of Koteen & Burt, representing station WVOX, New Rochelle, New York, wrote to one Donald Flamm, who passed the letter on to the ADL. "Particularly over the course of the last year or so, a great deal of pressure has been brought to bear upon WVOX... by various people and organizations in an attempt to force it to drop "Liberty Lobby"... During the course of various inquiries about this program, I have reviewed numerous scripts to determine, among other things, whether it is being used as a vehicle for attacking various people and groups and whether, therefore, various requirements of the Federal Communications Commission's Fairness Doctrine come into play. In no instance that has come to my attention have I found anything which is even superficially anti-Semitic." The attorney went on to say that a New York "Times" reporter who had done a story on the program had found nothing anti-Semitic in it, and that the station president, Bill O'Shaughnessy, "has become satisfied that those who actually bother to listen to the program have not found it to be anti-Semitic." The lawyer stated that the American Civil Liberties Union believed that attempts to remove the program from the air "represent a classic example of attempts to suppress freedom of speech." All broadcasters were not as courageous as O'Shaughnessy, who refused to buckle even though he was favored with menacing letters from ADL general counsel Arnold Forster personally. According to an ADL memorandum, Howard Warshaw, president of Universal Broadcasting Company, New York, after having met with ADL staff and having been warned by them that "This is Liberty Lobby" was "anti-Semitic," ordered the general manager of WTHE (Mineola, Long Island) to listen to all Liberty Lobby programs in advance and to discuss any "questionable" material with him. If any tape contained "the kind of anti-Semitic material contained in the specimens we reviewed" (i.e. criticisms of Israel and of potential U.S. involvement in a Middle East war) they would be pre-empted, or an older tape played. The memo, from Mel Cooperman to Harry Rosenkranz, January 10, 1974, concluded: "By the way, WTHE has carried, and will continue to carry every ADL "Report from Israel" program we send them, as they have for six years." On April 23, 1974, the ADL's Monroe Schlactus wrote to ADL's "director of domestic fact-finding," Irwin Suall, that he had been told that Howard Warshaw of Long Island "has begun to be most cooperative in killing the tapes even before we express concern." It happened that Warshaw also owned station KUXL in Schlactus' Minnesota territory: "I would imagine that through Mel's contact with Warshaw, we may be able to preview all the Liberty Lobby tapes before their airing." A memorandum from Isadore Zack to Herman Brown, with copies to various ADL higher-ups, spread the following good news: "I understand from Sherm Keller of WRYT-Boston that his boss, Ken Carter, plans to audition the Liberty Lobby tapes before putting them on the air and will not use any program that mentions Israel in a derogatory way. I am alerting our monitors to check this out." Liberty Lobby Makes Comeback The massive ADL "counteraction" (fully documented in official documents procured through legal process) did result by 1975 in the loss of many stations and the cancellation by the Mutual Network of its contract with Liberty Lobby to carry the program. This reduced the total number of stations to 106. However, in spite of continuing ADL pressure, today (June, 1981) the program is carried on 470 stations, most of them as a free public service. The program's point of view today is identical to what it was in 1975, which should say something about the increasing public acceptance of Liberty Lobby's pro-American outlook. In Liberty Lobby's files there is also documentary evidence that ADL agents have contacted advertisers in order to prevent them from placing ads in Liberty Lobby publications, and that ADL agents seek out contributors to Liberty Lobby and pay visits to their homes. Even advertising agencies are put on the griddle: "For the record, I have received information that there is an advertising agency in Los Angeles which is handling the placing of Liberty Lobby's radio program on radio stations nationally... I have asked Harvey Schechter to undertake an investigation of this agency. -- Memorandum from Irwin Suall (director of ADL's "Domestic Fact-finding Department") to Justin Finger, February 14, 1974. "Talent" is not immune from persecution, either: The same Harvey Schechter (of the ADL's Los Angeles regional office) who was to investigate Liberty Lobby's advertising agency was also hot on the trail of the famous announcer who introduced Liberty Lobby's radio programs. Schechter wrote to Maxwell Greenberg on July 30, 1974: "I for one, am distressed at the fact that Liberty Lobby broadcasts begin with an opening comment by Harry von Zell... In view of his key position with Home Savings and Loan and the gutter anti-Semitism of the Liberty Lobby, I would like to suggest that a letter from you to him about this might further stimulate him to take action to deny Liberty Lobby the use of his voice." In an unrelated incident, a radio announcer named Allan E. Augustine was fired by WOKY, Milwaukee, after the ADL complained that Augustine had acted irresponsibly in interviewing two nazis on his talk show. Union Saves Pilot's Job A final example of the ADL's tactics shows them at their most vile. On April 3, 1978, Irwin Suall wrote to the management of Trans World Airlines (TWA): "I'm writing at the suggestion of Arnold Forster, who happens to be abroad at present, concerning Mr. ----, a TWA pilot who has managed to antagonize a large number of people in New Jersey." The letter went on to accuse the TWA pilot of writing letters-to-the-editor which were critical of "Jews, Zionism and Israel." (In actual fact, the pilot had never criticized Jews. He had, however, gone so far as to put an ad in a newspaper in which he placed, according to Suall, "the blame for the deaths in the March 11th PLO raid on the Israelis.") "It so happens that a number of people apparently know that --- is a TWA pilot..., ---'s propaganda activities are apparently linked in their minds with TWA. "Mr. Foster felt that you would want to be informed about this matter and asked me, just before he left, to share the information with you and to convey to you his most cordial regards, I would be pleased to hear from you." At last report the pilot still has his job, although thanks more to his union and the Railroad Labor Act than to his employer, Cases of this kind come to the light of day only rarely; many a man has probably been dismissed at the behest of the ADL without ever knowing the real cause. Represents A Foreign Nation No regular reader of the "ADL Bulletin" and other ADL publications and productions can doubt that the ADL's primary concern is the artificial nation of Israel. The welfare of Israel is put above all else, certainly including the United States. Visits to the United States by Israeli generals and politicians are given front-page coverage in such reverential tones as are reserved by Catholic newspapers for visits of the pope. The pronouncements of Israeli leaders are published with obbligatos of adulation -- except for a couple of times when Prime Minister Menachem Begin went so far in his cheerleading for Jewish influence in the U.S., and in his open calls for the Jewish lobby to get what Israel wanted, that the ADL feared people would realize that he was proving what the "anti-Semites" had been saying all along. The ADL tries to put the best appearances on everything Israel does, while the United States is judged as good or bad depending on the extent of its support for Israel. The same goes for other countries: The Soviet Union was enormously popular with Zionists until it interfered with emigration of Soviet Jews to Israel. The Soviet Union then became a wicked and anti-Semitic country, and the U.S. was expected to dump ice on its d�tente with the Soviets and prune its foreign policy accordingly. And, of course, the most glaring example of distortion of American policy for Israel's benefit appears in the costly hostility of the United States toward the Arab countries -- a policy totally opposed to America's true interests and existing entirely because of Israel's long-lasting war with its neighbors. Israel the Only Issue There is one and only issue as far as the ADL is concerned -- Israel. If Israel tries to sink a ship of the United States Navy and murders 34 Americans in the process, the ADL prides itself on covering up the facts and explaining them away, while on the other hand anybody who ever killed an Israeli (even though his country is at war with Israel) is a despicable terrorist and bloodthirsty outlaw. A careful distinction is made between those who are able to kill large numbers of civilians from airplanes (American supplied airplanes) and those who can afford only to kill smaller numbers on foot. The ADL never tires of telling us, and having us told, that because the population of the Jewish state is made up of an exceptional people unceasingly persecuted due to some ineradicable flaw in all non-Jews, the Israelis are exempt from the rules of human behavior and have a special license to steal other people's real estate, to kidnap anywhere in the world, to torture, to kill, to lie, to falsely accuse, and to interfere at will in the politics and social development of other countries. To justify and further the programs and aims of Israel is the primary mission of the ADL. The organization is, of course, at one with the B'nai B'rith, with its large and highly manageable and influential system of professional lodges. Especially significant are those lodges made up of highly placed people in the advertising, publishing, entertainment, and news fields. It works in alliance with other groups that comprise the Israel lobby -- such as the American Jewish Committee, whose Washington representative, Hyman Bookbinder, boasted in a public speech of the speed with which he had been able to assemble on the Capitol steps a display of American congressmen and senators in support of an Israeli government demand. Sophisticated Intimidation As contrasted to the Jewish Defense League, which uses physical intimidation and overt violence while literally parading the Israeli flag within this country, the ADL deals primarily in propaganda and moral, political, and financial intimidation. It instigates, coordinates, places, and often writes, on behalf of Israel the avalanche of slanted news stories, editorials, magazine articles, television programs, cartoons, politicians' speeches, entries in the "Congressional Record," letters, and even motion pictures and novels, which -- particularly at the time of some Israeli crisis or extensive Israeli demand on American leaders and taxpayers -- smothers the United States. Once a rock has been started rolling downhill, one does not have to keep prodding it or the others it picks up along the way: People know what is expected of them. If they do not, they will be "sensitized," or perhaps even tenderized. Event he standup comic knows that to defy the party line would be professional suicide. Toward the end of the 1960's the ADL and its cohorts accuse Poland of "anti-Semitic" acts, (See, for example, entry by the ADL's congressman, Joshua Eilberg, in the July 16, 1968 "Congressional Record") and lo, within days the insulting "Polish joke" was born, pounding home month after month the alleged stupidity of the Polish people who up to then had been treated as heroic defenders of freedom. In such ways American attitudes are molded to the benefit of Israel and to the detriment of any group on Israel's hit list. The inconvenient fact that what helps Israel usually hurts the United States is handled by the ADL and similar organizations by the technique, proof of the intent of which is available in numerous publicly distributed recordings of their meetings, of trying to make Israeli interests appear identical to the interests of the United States and attractive to the American people. "We are a minority too small to have our desired effect without the help of many others," goes the reasoning. "we must therefore make other people identify our interests with theirs, and we must create the illusion that what is good for us is good for America." By such sleight of hand, the tiger is led by the monkey, and a great and powerful nation is made to sacrifice its own welfare for the sake which has nothing to offer in return except the probability of involvement in nuclear war. Foreign Agents Registration Act The Foreign Agents Registration Act, Title 22 U.S. Code �611 et seq., provides criminal penalties for failure of propagandists and others active in this country on behalf of foreigners to file highly detailed registration statements with the Attorney General, to file copies of all political propaganda (however disguised or sugar-coated), and to label all such propaganda conspicuously, and to keep and reveal records of their activities. "Political propaganda" is defined by the act to include any "communication or expression by any person... which is reasonably adapted to, or which the person disseminating the same believes will, or which he intends to, prevail upon, indoctrinate, induce, or in any other way influence a recipient or any section of the public within the United States with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party or with reference to the foreign policies of the United States..." �611(j). The same rules apply to "political activities" which in any way "influence any agency or official of the public within the United States with reference to formulating, adopting, or changing the domestic or foreign policies of the United States or with reference to the political or public interests, policies, or relations of a government of a foreign country or a foreign political party" �611 (o). The Foreign Agents Registration Act is designed to include anyone "who directly or through any other person" carries on such activities and who acts as an agent, representative or "in any other capacity" at the order, request, or under the direction or control, or under the direct or indirect supervision, direction, control, or subsidization of a foreign principal �611(b). 'There is absolutely no doubt that the ADL is operating in criminal violation of the Foreign Agents Registration Act; that its foreign principals include the government of Israel and its subdivisions, numerous Israeli Zionist groups such as the World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency and their fundraising branches within the United States; and that the ADL works in complicity with large numbers of equally guilty parties in the American communication media and the political arena.' It is the job of the U.S. Department of Justice to enforce the Foreign Agents Registration Act, (*) but while the department has exerted itself ordering American Protestant ministers to register as foreign agents because they arranged preaching and a few other public appearances for some clergymen of the Christian League of Southern Africa, ('Washington Weekly', Oct. 5, 1978) it has been curiously paralyzed when it comes to pursuing the ADL and its huge network of coordinated Israeli agents. (*) [Title 50, �851-858 contains additional provisions for registration of foreign agents with the Attorney General. These sections are applicable to "every person who has knowledge of" espionage, tactics or terrorism of "a government of a foreign country..." it stretches the imagination to assume that ADL officers are not fully aware of the activities of the terrorist organization known as the Jewish Defense League, an open agent of Israel which provocatively flies the Israeli flag during its demonstrations against "enemies of Israel." No one can miss the perfect orchestration of ADL and JDL activities. It is commonly believed that both agencies are manipulated by the efficient Israeli espionage and terrorist are, the Mossad.] Easy To Document Documentation of the ADL's actions as an agent of Israel is neither rare nor difficult to come by. Indeed, it is almost impossible to encompass its scope in a paper of this length. The examples that follow are a fair selection from among thousands. First, there is no question that Israel, which could never have existed financially, militarily, or otherwise without the constant support of the United States, wishes to exert all possible influence on this country and to draw all possible sustenance from it, while preventing any aid or support by the United States going to countries on Israel's enemies list, and in particular to the Arab countries from which Israel hacked out its territory. The World Zionist Organization and the Jewish Agency are specifically designed to be the Israeli government's overseas arms. Even though purposely not made branches of the government, the status, function, and authority of the WZO and the Jewish Agency are set forth in Israeli law. Among their goals are to organize Jewish communities outside Israel to serve Zionist purposes, to spread propaganda, to see that money is collected (almost always to tax-exempt "charitable" organizations) and channeled to Israel, to encourage immigration into Israel, and to influence various governments to formulate foreign policy to pass laws which favor Israel. Most of the Israeli aims in the United States are spearheaded by the ADL, with other Zionist-oriented groups such as the American Jewish Committee playing important roles. The WZO and the Jewish Agency keep a low profile, while the ADL poses as an American organization serving American Jewish aims, though in reality honing its activities to serve Israel on every point. When Arab countries organized a boycott of Israel, the ADL openly led the fight to have anti-boycott legislation passed in the U.S., took measures to see that American businesses were trading with Israel under the anti-boycott laws, and even acted on Israel's behalf as regarded Japan's cooperation with the Arab boycott. "The Anti-Defamation League, a Jewish organization, has long been bothered by the Japanese reaction to the boycott. For years, the organization has been trying on its own to persuade the Japanese to change their policy. Now, evidently wearying of these efforts, Anti-Defamation League officials are seeking the aid of American corporations." -- The Wall Street Journal, May 13, 1968 On March 4, 1975, the New York Times reported that: "The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith has written to President Ford reporting what it calls a concerted campaign among shipping companies, aided and abetted by American commercial banks unlawfully to comply with the Arab boycott regulations against the state of Israel." Since 1966, the ADL has produced a radio program called "Dateline Israel," some 26 new programs each year, broadcast over hundreds of stations, which consists entirely of Israeli propaganda. Prominent in the origins and production of "Dateline Israel" was ADL general counsel Arnold Forster, who was reported in the May, 1974 "ADL Bulletin" to have been to Israel more than 50 times. Forster Writes Letters Forster, among his other achievements on behalf of a foreign state, wrote seemingly innumerable letters (always published, of course) to the editors of major newspapers on subjects having exclusively to do with Israel and the protection or furtherance of Israeli interest. Every public criticism of Israel was met with a thundering defense. Every Israeli policy was dolled up as a glamorous boon to American interests. every hint of cooperation with Arab countries by the U.S. was depicted as a dark collaboration with the forces of evil. In 1973 the ADL took out full-page newspaper advertisements whose message was that Arab oil-producing countries were greedy and that any change in the Mideast policy of the United States that might please the Arabs would not improve the American oil situation. The ads were designed to influence public opinion to ignore the obvious -- that the oil cut-off by the Arabs had been a direct response to the United States mindlessly and illogically supporting Israel in an aggressive war against Arab countries. "Maariv," published in Tel Aviv, Israel, reported (Jan 14, 1969) that the ADL in the United States had made a study of Arab "propaganda" against Israel, and had concluded that the center of export of such propaganda to America was Beirut, Lebanon. Arnold Forster was in charge of the ADL study. "Mr. Foster [sic], who is now in Israel as one of the representatives of the Jewish organizations to the conference called by the prime minister, said that the Arabs have discovered the best way to lie is from a distance." For the ADL, there is obviously one overriding issue -- Israel -- and old allies who don't agree become 'persona non grata'. ADL Chairman Kenneth Bialkin, in a New York "Times" item (Aug. 19, 1979), said that "some black leaders have become persuaded by new left propaganda and have taken up with the worst of pro-Arab, anti-Israeli elements." Bailkin called such blacks "troublemakers." |
September 23rd, 2005 | #25 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Bigoted Extremists
A couple of years earlier, when black American workers wanted to comply with the Arab boycott of Israel, the ADL said that a coalition, including blacks who said they would be the first to lose their jobs if Arabs withdrew their business, involved "bigoted extremists" linked to "anti-Semitism" -- a good example of name-calling when logic would lose the day. When the executive committee of the B'nai B'rith International Council met in 1960, the president concluded: "Positive action by the Jewish communities should be taken to combat Arab League propaganda," and " a program of counter -- action to deal with the Arab League should be considered." ("Summary-Minutes, B'nai B'rith International Council, Executive Committee Meeting January 26-27, 1960, Amsterdam, Netherlands.") The B'nai B'rith, swearing that it is strictly a religious, charitable, and welfare organization, has taken an active role in getting funds from Germany as compensation or reparation to Jews who claimed to have been unjustly damaged by Hitler's government. A revealing insight into the procedure is offered by a B'nai B'rith "Memorandum to Members of the Board of Governors from Maurice Bisguer" (Feb. 17, 1960): "In accordance with the claims agreement resulting from West German B'nai B'rith negotiations, the predominant amount of funds is to be reserved for Israel." A typical issue of the "ADL Bulletin" would appear to have been conceived and composed in an Israeli information office. The June, 1980 issue, for example, which happens to contain an uncomplimentary article about Liberty Lobby, begins with an article by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger (who is pictured receiving an award form the ADL) entitled "The Middle East." With subheads such as "No Negotiations with PLO," it contains nothing even remotely displeasing to Israel, and lest we miss its real point, the following words are emphasized by being printed in a shaded rectangle: "While in office and after, I never believed and I do not believe now that the solution to the West Bank problem can be the creation of a Palestinian state." Oil Is Menace Inside the front cover of the same issue is a comment by ADL national director, Nathan Perlmutter. Leading off with the news that anti-Semitism, "as we have customarily measured it," has been declining, he says that the greatest danger "to us" is oil because nations which want oil from the Arabs are snuggling up to the PLO, and, "in the hapless balance is Israel." There follows a long, illustrated article on a trip to Israel by M. S. Forbes, editor-in-chief of "Forbes" business magazine, a trip which had been suggested and arranged by the ADL. "He went at the suggestion of Maxwell E. Greenberg, the Anti-Defamation League's national chairman, and Abraham H. Foxman, its associate national director, following a dispute between the ADL and "Forbes" editors over rejection of a league ad on peace in the Middle East which had been submitted for the "Forbes" annual Arabic Middle East edition. ADL felt the ad had been rejected because the magazine feared offending the Arabs..." So the ADL officers, suggesting "that a Forbes trip to Israel was long overdue," met Mr. Forbes in that Middles Eastern nation, introduced him to the right people in government, the military, and business, and showed him the country. Mr. Forbes, of course, loved Israel and the Israeli leaders, on whom he bestowed such accolades as "sharp, incisive," "perceptive, candid, with good judgments," "able, impressive" and "Oh, fabulous." Mr. Forbes likened America to Israel and had nasty things to say about the PLO. The next article in the June 1980 "ADL Bulletin" was entitled "PLO/Khomeini Connection." It dealt with the cordial relations between the PLO and the ever-unpopular ayatollah, and concluded that both "share the goal of destroying Israel," and that "to give them power is to whet their appetites, increasing their lust for destruction." (Shades of Adolf.) Vanessa Redgrave's Trouble The actress Vanessa Redrave narrated a film called "The Palestinian," which, although few who criticized it has actually seen it, outraged the ADL because it was reportedly anti-Israel and contained an interview with the head of the PLO. There were vigorous efforts to prevent the documentary from being seen in the U.S., and to ruin Vanessa Redgrave's acting career. Arnold Forster said on behalf of the ADL that to advocate the overthrow of Israel was "the ultimate anti-Semitism." Miss Redgrave commented: "The American public cherishes its right to information and to form its own opinions. It should not be abrogated into the hands of a minority of fanatical Zionists who want to destroy the Palestine Liberation Organizations and lie about its aims." -- Los Angeles Times, January 18, 1978 In a pitch letter to ADL supporters on November 10, 1975, Dore Schary listed as examples of the ADL's good work: Suing the U.S. to thwart the Arab boycott of Israel, exposing the collusion of other groups with the Arab boycott of Israel, and persuading the Gulf Oil Company to repudiate and publicly declare that it will never again repeat a contribution to "the Arab propaganda campaign" against Israel. Next on the agenda: "The recent vote in the United Nations attacking Zionism as 'racism'..." When President Jimmy Carter compared the Palestinian movement (to return to the farms and homes that had been taken by Israel) to the U.S. civil rights cause, spokesmen for the ADL called the comparison "insulting," and "frightening." Arnold Forster exercised his gift for meaningless semantic smokescreening by calling the PLO "False revolutionaries" and "murderers" (Washington "Post," Aug. 3. 1979). On January 9, 1981, the ADL's headquarters publicly distributed, under the label, "News," a report called "World-Views and Middle East Policy," by Kenneth Jacobsen, which compared the probable Middle East policy of the incoming Reagan administration. The entire discussion centers on the relative benefits to Israel which would result from the different policies. Carter, the report said, had seen Third-World nations (read Arabs) as essentially neutral, and to be won over through "friendly" approaches, which meant that the "U.S. would downplay Israel as a strategic interest, would see the Palestinian issue as the central problem in the Middle East, and would make periodic overtures to the PLO." (Not good.) Reagan, on the other hand, would bring with him those who would see both the Soviet threat and an Arab oil threat. (Good.) By convoluted and illogical arguments, Jacobsen comes to the conclusion that the U.S. has shown "unnecessary obsequiousness to the Arab world," and that the best way for America to meet the oil problem is to join more closely with Israel in its hostility to the Arab nations. 'With this new approach, there will be no hesitancy to support Israel as clearly America's most reliable ally and to identify Israel as a strategic asset to the U.S.' Many more examples could be cited to prove that the ADL, day after day, year after year, works within the United States as an agent in the service of a foreign nation. Not only are such political activities a violation of the Foreign Agents' Registration Act, but also disqualify the ADL from its tax-exempt status. Conclusion A suffocating atmosphere of threat, extortion, blackmail, character assassination, and falsehood hangs over the activities of the ADL. It is an atmosphere deliberately poisonous of freedom hangs over the activities of the ADL. It is an atmosphere deliberately poisonous of freedom of speech and thought, designedly stifling of the open exchange of ideas, and contrary to the provisions of the Constitution and to the most important considerations that motivated the American revolutionaries to create a new and independent nation in the first place. The ADL is alien in concept and subversive in operation. It is unethical, un-American and illegal. It operates as a thought police, smearbund, and intimidation mafia using traditional American institutions and gullible citizens to further the foreign policy aims of a foreign nation and the political power of political Zionism and individual Zionists. Its "chutzpah" cannot be excused, nor can the actions or inaction of Americans who know of its outrages but, because of fear, fail to fight them. Nothing can be more important today than to expose and contain this evil force. Nothing less than the safety of all Americans is at stake today as irresponsible Zionists play Russian roulette with a world nuclear holocaust. ---------- [This white paper was distributed to every member of the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States on June 1, 1981 in booklet form. Since then it has been sent hundreds of thousands of Liberty Lobby members and supporters. Demand has grown so fast that this edition has been prepared for each subscriber to The SPOTLIGHT. Extra copies of either the booklet edition or the newsprint edition are available from: Liberty Lobby, 300 Independence Ave, S.E., Washington D.C., 20003, 1-800-522-6292: NEWSPRINT Edition: $10 per hundred, BOOKLET Edition: 10 copies or more 40� each.] ---------- ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/SF/SFA/gov/ADL-Whitepaper |
September 23rd, 2005 | #26 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
rich jews talk down to Missourians
I'd like to know what Karen Aroesty, Regional Director, St. Louis Regional Office, gets paid per year to spread lies and hate against Gentiles on behalf of the ADL. I would bet that her income is twice that of the Missouri state average. Or more. Hey Karen, we know you read this website all the time, why dont you come on down and tell us what you make? HMMM?
|
September 23rd, 2005 | #27 | ||||||||||
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
what does ADL do in MO?
according to the ADL here's what it does in Missouri. I hope Missourians will ask themselves whether these Jews are the wonderful "light of the nations" they say that they are, or just a bunch of big city carpetbaggers stirring up trouble where they're not welcome. In quotes I will quote verbatim what the ADL says they're up to in Missouri-- go check for yourselves to see if I misquote them-- and then I will suggest what my interpretation is. Readers are free to make their own decisions.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
ADL welcomes Nigerians to Missouri? Oh hurrah. That's just great. Great for who? Did Mr Mwelwa Musambachime explain that to the listeners? I wonder. Quote:
Quote:
Diversity awareness = Making Whites feel guilty for being White. Brought to you by the Jewish ADL. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
September 24th, 2005 | #28 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
ADL as a hate group--they have no, NO, moral authority.
All they know is sheer terror. |
September 26th, 2005 | #29 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
|
|
September 26th, 2005 | #30 |
Retrosexual
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
|
Lenni Brenner's book: Zionism in the Age of the Dictators
Looks like a good source of information, as long as one keeps in mind that it was written by a marxist (Jew).
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion." - Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist. |
September 26th, 2005 | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
No way to victory but over the Jew!
Quote:
|
|
September 27th, 2005 | #32 | |
Retrosexual
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion." - Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist. |
|
September 27th, 2005 | #33 | |
Retrosexual
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
|
A Jew is a Jew is a Jew
According to Mr. Brenner, the IHR are "roaches", "nutsies", "loony", and "crackpots".
In a letter to the IHR, he wrote: Quote:
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion." - Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist. |
|
September 30th, 2005 | #34 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,938
|
Machinations of the Anti-Defamation League
Paul “Pete” McCloskey A former US Congressman tells how his long career in law, politics, academic life, and the US Marine Corps led him to mistrust governmental official history, and to esteem the mission of the IHR. McCloskey relates what he has learned in his role as lead attorney in an ongoing class action suit that targets the ADL's vast spy operation, in concert with corrupt police officials in America and Israeli spy and police agen*cies, against American citizens. Inside information on how the Zionist lobby torpedoed his political career (and those of other loyal Americans); on how Jewish pressure prevented Stan*ford University from hiring world-class historian Norman Davies; on how, and why, the Lobby works the way it does. A witty, wise, enlightening presentation -- from the 13th IHR Conference (May 2000) -- by a contemporary rarity: a coura*geous, thoughtful, and independent man in public life. Here |
October 1st, 2005 | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
|
Quote:
Former U.S. Congressman Paul Findley (D) from Illinois, who served 22 years in Congress, is another highly outspoken jew-wise critic of the GD kikes. He stated in his book, "They Dare to Speak Out" : "No American foreign policy is possible without jewish approval." (Among his many truths). Interestingly, Jesse Jackson was one of the dozen or so "prominent" leaders who indorsed that book. Quoting credible people like McCloskey and Findley are essential to our efforts to EXPOSE THE JEWS to the masses. Thanks.
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire |
|
October 1st, 2005 | #36 |
deken
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
|
You can't understand the nigger problem unil you understand the Jew problem
All major black "leaders" bow down to their Jewish masters. The ADL's endorsement is eagerly sought after by most black leaders. The ADL is actively trying to become a world-wide power by spreading their tentacles internationally. A recent article by the ADL criticises Namimbia, an African country who looks like it was the inspiration for the movie "Planet of the Apes", for publishing anti-holocaust articles there. My biggest surprise was that there were blacks that didn't buy into the holocaust bullshit, but the ADL, under Jew Foxman, went ballistic. The ADL is a powerful and dangerous organization. Never underestimate its power and danger to whites.
|
October 1st, 2005 | #37 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
Quote:
|
|
October 1st, 2005 | #38 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 12,684
|
Quote:
One Florida soccermom who received a TAA was quoted in a Florida newspaper as calling it "psychological terrorism." What she really meant was that TAA truths and realities scared the shit out of her. TAA 3 btw, is gonna scare the shit out of more soccermoms and girli-men than all previous editions combined. Oh, glory days !!! (How many copies should I put you down for, Will?)
__________________
“To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —–Voltaire |
|
October 1st, 2005 | #39 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,603
|
Quote:
In line with the comments of that Florida soccer mom, a Raleigh TV newsreader once commented on some literature I and my comrades had distributed there with this: "The reason these people are so dangerous is because they come across as so reasonable and rational." No shit, Sherlock! And those we are trying to reach respond to reasonable, rational White folks who stand up and consistently articulate what they have been feeling but never hear from newsreading media whores. |
|
October 1st, 2005 | #40 | |
Retrosexual
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The New Jerusalem
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
__________________
"A safe rule where Jewish propaganda is concerned is to multiply or divide their figures by ten, at least, before accepting them as the basis for discussion." - Arnold Leese, from the December, 1937 edition of The Fascist. |
|
Tags |
abe foxman, adl, jew lies, jew on white, jew pedophile, jew propaganda, jew rape, leo frank, mary phagan |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|