Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 24th, 2008 #1
alex revision
Senior Member
 
alex revision's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 16,341
alex revision
Default Jews Swindle White Individuals, Corporations, and Nations

The Rothschilds and their 200 years of political influence

23 October 2008


Independent.co.uk

Nat Rothschild, the financier at the centre of allegations that threaten to engulf the shadow Chancellor, George Osborne, is no stranger to laws which forbid politicians from accepting donations from abroad.

Political donations from overseas are also illegal in the US, where John McCain's campaign team is under investigation for allegedly accepting a benefit in kind from two mega-rich British citizens, namely Nat Rothschild and his father, Jacob, the Fourth Baron Rothschild.

In April, Mr McCain passed through London and spoke at a fund-raising dinner for expatriate Americans, where seats at the cheapest tables cost £500 a head. What caught the eye of Judicial Watch, a Washington-based foundation dedicated to combating corruption, was that the event was held "by kind permission of Lord Rothschild and Hon Nathaniel Rothschild" at the family home in Spencer House, St James's, the only privately owned 17th-century palace in central London.

The US Federal Election Committee is still investigating the allegation that Mr McCain's campaign team broke electoral law by accepting a benefit in kind from the Rothschilds. "We haven't heard from the FEC yet, and don't expect to until after the campaign," Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch said.

The Rothschild family and politics have been intertwined for generations, ever since Nathan Rothschild, who founded the English branch of the family business, financed Britain's war against Napoleon two centuries ago.

Nathan was the son of Mayer Rothschild, who founded the family business in the Jewish ghetto in Frankfurt during the 18th century.

Serena Rothschild, Nat Rothschild's mother, was one of the largest individual donors to the Conservative Party last year. She gave £190,000.
She has also helped fund Mr Osborne's office.

When another member of the clan, Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, married the New York businesswoman Lynn Forester, they spent the night of their wedding dinner in the White House as guests of Bill Clinton. Lady Rothschild was a fund-raiser for the Democrats, but defected to the McCain camp after her friend Hillary Clinton was beaten to the nomination by Barack Obama.

So it is nothing new for a Rothschild to be mixing with prominent politicians – but generally they do it in a way that does not invite unnecessary publicity. What is unusual about Nat Rothschild's sudden intervention in the affair of the oligarch and the Corfu yacht is the way he has placed himself centre stage. His presumed motive is anger at Mr Osborne's bad manners in passing on what Peter Mandelson had said about Gordon Brown, when Lord Mandelson, Mr Osborne, and Mr Rothschild were guests of the Russian aluminium tycoon Oleg Deripaska.

Despite the now famous photograph that shows Mr Rothschild and Mr Osborne as privileged 21-year-old Oxford undergraduates, they were not close friends and their paths soon diverged. Within two years of that photograph being taken, Mr Osborne had set himself on his chosen career path by taking up a senior post at Conservative headquarters. In the same year, Nat Rothschild, showing no interest in finding a steady job, teamed up with Annabelle Neilson, a model he had met on a beach in India, eloped to Las Vegas, and married her.

His horrified parents must have feared that he was heading off on the same self-destructive course as two of his cousins – Amschel, who hanged himself in a Paris hotel in 1996, and Rafael, who died of a heroin overdose in Manhattan at the age of 23.

But Nat Rothschild emerged from his marriage break-up three years later a changed man. In New York, he met Timothy Barakett, founder of Atticus Capital, a hedge fund that places large and often risky bets on behalf of wealthy clients. Mr Rothschild became co-chairman of the business, which at its peak was managing investments worth more than £20bn. That was before turmoil in the markets – last month, it was reported that £2.5bn had been knocked off the value of Atticus's assets.

Even so, Nat Rothschild is thought to have made much more than the money he stood to inherit as Jacob Rothschild's youngest child and only son. Father and son are now a team, who co-founded JNR, an investment vehicle with offices in London and New York and extensive interest in Russia. It was Jacob who introduced Nat to Peter Mandelson.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...ce-969772.html
 
Old October 27th, 2008 #2
Jack Black
Member
 
Jack Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 308
Jack Black
Default

In twelve articles published by various mainstream British newspapers between the 21st and 27th of October, concerned with the Mandelson, Osborne, Deripaska connection:

Anton Malevsky was a gangster and the Oligarch, Boris Berezovsky, was once described by Forbes Magazine as the Head of the Russian Mafia. The Oligarch, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, is still in jail and the Oligarchs Roman Abramovich and Mikhail Cherney are also suspected of being involved in some very heavy duty behaviour.

All of the above are Jewish.

As is Deripaska, as was the father of Peter Mandelson.

Mayer, Nathan, Serena, Victoria, Jacob and Nat Rothschild, Rupert Murdoch, David and Simon Reuben, Frank Lowy; Andrew Feldman; Matthew Freud; Ben Silverman, Billy Joel and Ken Livingstone, most of whom are connected to the scandal in some way and were mentioned in the articles, are also Jewish.

Some say that the Rothschilds financed both sides of every major war since Napoleonic times.

Which, if true, isn't all that nice either.

If you want to pick through the "mainstream" articles in question, check out this link:

I Am An Englishman
 
Old October 30th, 2008 #3
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3821262/Th..._related_doc=1
http://m.1asphost.com/ABigSecret/boo...othschilds.pdf

Last edited by Mike Mazzone of Palatine; October 30th, 2008 at 01:37 PM.
 
Old October 30th, 2008 #4
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Kievsky
Default

We need a White Rothschild more than anything. Basically someone who uses his wealth towards White Emancipation. That was the Rothschild thing back in the 1820's until Lionel was elected a British MP in the 1840's.

It is absolutely true that we suffer under laws that handicap Whites; a wealthy White can do what it takes to remove these handicaps and restore the Freedom of Association, which will lead to all other good things. White Emancipation is not some novel thing, it is merely a matter of restoring the founding document of this country!
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old October 30th, 2008 #5
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kievsky View Post
We need a White Rothschild more than anything.
Would such a man be embraced by his fellow whites, or would they scrutinize every aspect of his life and focus on how he doesn't live up to their expectations. This would depend very much upon how white racialists interact with him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kievsky View Post
Basically someone who uses his wealth towards White Emancipation.
How specifically will that wealth be allocated? What emancipation efforts get the best results? We need to plan the logistics so that the efforts are sustainable.

Currently there are many outlets where our message can be heard without spending a lot on overhead. Our message is very blunt: "Jews: The White Family's Worst Enemy".

We have lots of images of typical jewish behavior. Supplement those images with the written message to make it a mantra. We need enough of those images to spread around wherever people are exposed to different forms of TJB. Whether it be news events, historical review, discussion of advertising principles or anywhere else we can have a voice.

If we're persuasive enough, we might find our man.

Last edited by Mike Mazzone of Palatine; October 30th, 2008 at 02:18 PM.
 
Old October 30th, 2008 #6
Kievsky
Senior Member
 
Kievsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,229
Kievsky
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Mazzone of Palatine View Post
Would such a man be embraced by his fellow whites, or would they scrutinize every aspect of his life and focus on how he doesn't live up to their expectations. This would depend very much upon how white racialists interact with him.
The naysayers would be ignored.
__________________
Godzilla mit uns!
http://mindweaponsinragnarok.wordpress.com
 
Old October 30th, 2008 #7
Mike Mazzone of Palatine
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kievsky View Post
The naysayers would be ignored.
Excellent. Notice how podblanc has "White Now" embedded on their videos? Is it possible to switch to "Jews: The White Family's Worst Enemy" every time TJB is exposed during a podblanc vid? It would strengthen the connection of jew=enemy in the minds of our viewers. If the theme of jew=enemy is not strong enough in the mind of a potential venture capitalist, better marketed options may seize his wallet.

Such a media technique would be very cutting edge. It would be a unique selling point when soliciting funding. Our message would be more clearly stated in every piece we put out there.

Problem "Jews: The White Family's Worst Enemy"
Solution "White Now"

It's important to convincingly and effectively convey this message at all times to both the best and worst of the white stock. Once that goal is achieved, we can better solicit funding. Our target market is the white race. For funding purposes, we must convey the urgency of this message to the wealthiest whites, not necessarily the whites who best share all of our ideals. We must also convincingly inform them of the benefits and plausibility of victory.
 
Old January 10th, 2009 #8
H.E.A.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Jews Swindle and Manipulate Financial Systems to Damage White Nations

http://www.radioislam.org/thetruth/22wallst.htm
 
Old January 13th, 2009 #9
Jack Black
Member
 
Jack Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 308
Jack Black
Default Jews Swindle and Manipulate Financial System to Damage White Nations

His firm has played a major role in world finance for decades.

It formed partnerships with some of the largest brokerage businesses on Wall Street, including Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch.

He advised the Securities and Exchange Commission how to regulate markets, served as Chairman of the Nasdaq Stock Market and headed the trading committee of Wall Street’s biggest trade group. His firm was one of the three top market makers in Nasdaq stocks and the third-largest matching buyers and sellers of securities on the New York Stock Exchange.

He was also a fixture on the Palm Beach social scene and a member of some of its most exclusive clubs.

One newspaper reported him as a “man who had cultivated an image as a straight-shooter with a personal touch” and his company's web site stated that "in an era of faceless organizations ... Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC harks back to an earlier era in the financial world: The owner's name is on the door… Bernard Madoff has a personal interest in maintaining the unblemished record of value, fair-dealing, and high ethical standards that has always been the firm's hallmark."

The web site was still saying this the day after Bernard Madoff was arrested for perpetrating the largest fraud in American history.

On 11 December 2008, The New York Times reported thus:

Quote:
The first alarm bells rang at the firm on Tuesday, when Mr. Madoff told a senior executive he wanted to pay his employees their annual bonuses in December, two months early.

Just days earlier, Mr. Madoff had told another senior executive he was struggling to raise cash to cover about $7 billion in requested withdrawals from his clients… So on Wednesday, the senior executive visited Mr. Madoff’s office… and asked for an explanation. Instead, Mr. Madoff invited the two executives to his Manhattan apartment that evening. When they joined him there, he told them that his money-management business was ‘all just one big lie’… Madoff “stated that he was ‘finished,’ that he had ‘absolutely nothing…

Madoff told the executives he intended to surrender to the authorities in about a week BUT FIRST WANTED TO DISTRIBUTE APPROXIMATELY $200 MILLION TO $300 MILLION TO ‘CERTAIN SELECTED EMPLOYEES, FAMILY AND FRIENDS’.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/bu...f&st=cse&scp=1

Oh yes.

He might have stolen a lot of cash off huge numbers of people but he still had enough stashed away to sort out his nearest and dearest. The NYT continued:

“According to the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mr. Madoff confessed to an F.B.I. agent that there was ‘no innocent explanation’ for his behaviour... He had lost money on his trades, he told the agent, and had ‘paid investors with money that wasn’t there’.
On 15 December 2008, The Evening Standard told us that "the key question being asked on Wall Street is how the main US financial regulators, the Securities and Exchange Commission, failed to see that a vast fraud was being carried out right under their noses".

The Standard added:

Quote:
Today it emerged that the SEC had not inspected Madoff's investment advice business since it was first registered with the agency in 2006.

THERE WAS GROWING CONCERN THAT MADOFF'S IMPECCABLE POLITICAL, BUSINESS AND CHARITY CONNECTIONS MEANT IT WAS EASIER FOR HIM TO PULL THE WOOL OVER THE EYES OF THE REGULATORS.
British banks lose £1billion in Wall Street fraud | News

On 15 December 2008, Bloomberg.com told us this:

Quote:
SINCE 2000, BERNARD MADOFF HAS GIVEN AT LEAST $100,000 TO THE DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE AND MORE THAN $23,000 TO THE PARTY’S CANDIDATES, INCLUDING SENATOR CHARLES SCHUMER OF NEW YORK AND SENATOR FRANK LAUTENBERG OF NEW JERSEY.
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide

Ladies and gentlemen, the man with the "impeccable political, business and charity connections", who also, quite by chance, appears to be the greatest swindler in US history, is Jewish.

As are the aforementioned Senators, Schumer and Lautenberg and, I am sure, quite a few of his impeccable connections.

On 15 December 2008, The Daily Telegraph told us that Madoff and his wife also “gave away millions to arts and education groups and JEWISH CHARITIES and served on the boards of several prominent foundations, theatres and colleges.”

I wonder if the donated millions gave him a say, regarding the curriculum and ethos of the “education groups” and “colleges”?

The Telegraph added:

Quote:
You had to be invited to get an 'in' with Bernie, as friends knew him. This allure of exclusivity and reputation for impressive financial returns helped convince many investors of his financial bona fides, even though some money men raised repeated concerns about his firm's zero volatility results and lack of oversight…

Many of those who won an 'in' with Mr Madoff have now lost their life savings after trusting everything to ‘Bernie’.
Bernie Madoff: Profile of a Wall Street star - Telegraph

On 15 December 2008, The Evening Standard told us this:

Quote:
Two of Britain's leading banks are thought to have lost more than £1billion in the world's biggest fraud, it was revealed this afternoon.

HSBC said its exposure to the Bernard Madoff Wall Street swindle was ‘in the region of’ £688million.

Royal Bank of Scotland said its loss will be about £400million. HALF OF ANY LOSSES INCURRED BY RBS WILL FALL ON THE TAXPAYER FOLLOWING THE GOVERNMENT BAIL-OUT LAST MONTH.

Dozens of other leading City institutions, including its biggest hedge fund, Man Group, sponsor of the Booker prize, and Nicola Horlick's Bramdean Asset Management have been stung.

Spanish bank Santander, owner of ABBEY, ALLIANCE & LEICESTER AND THE SAVINGS BUSINESS OF BRADFORD & BINGLEY, said its potential exposure was more than £2billion.

The losses could not have come at a worse time for a British banking industry struggling with the credit crunch and the economic downturn...

Madoff, ONE OF WALL STREET'S MOSTS RESPECTED FUND MANAGERS, won followers all over the world because of the consistent high returns from the funds run by Madoff Investment Securities.

BUT HIS OPERATION WAS IN EFFECT A GIANT PYRAMID SCHEME WITH MONEY FROM NEW INVESTORS PAYING FOR THE PROFITS FOR ESTABLISHED BACKERS… AMONG OLDER, JEWISH INVESTORS MADOFF WAS KNOWN AS THE ‘JEWISH BOND’ BECAUSE INVESTMENTS WITH HIM PAID OUT BETWEEN EIGHT PER CENT AND 12 PER CENT EVERY YEAR.
British banks lose £1billion in Wall Street fraud | News

Well, here we see who the “established backers” were.

They would appear to have been the “older, Jewish investors”.

I wonder who the “new investors” who were propping up the “giant pyramid scheme” happened to be?

Ladies and gentlemen, I would bet Bernard Madoff’s bottom dollar that the newbies could be found amongst the Brit-based banks, HSBC, the Royal Bank of Scotland, the ABBEY, the Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley.

The pensioners of Axa Insurance would also be at risk and five Liverpool Councils, Dorset County Council and Hampshire County Council have already admitted to having liabilities of more than £12million between them.

And, ladies and gents, when I post this information in those “free speech” forums that haven’t yet banned me, do you know what the PC Crowd will do? They will not criticise the criminal whose greed, dishonesty and self-service have caused so many such fear and misery. But THEY WILL call me a whole lot of nasty names for having pointed out Bernard Madoff’s pedigree!

On 14 December 2008, the web site of the Israeli Daily, Ha’aretz, reported thus:

Quote:
The arrest of Wall Street trader Bernard L. Madoff, who federal agents say defrauded investors of an estimated $50 billion, has had immediate consequences in the Jewish philanthropic world…

On Friday, Madoff resigned from Yeshiva University, where he served as the chairman of the Sy Syms School of Business and treasurer of the board of trustees… In a statement, Yeshiva University spokeswoman Hedy Shulman said that news of Madoff's arrest had ‘shocked’ university officials…

The same day, the Boston-based Robert I. Lappin Charitable Foundation, which had the bulk of its money invested with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, closed its doors and terminated its seven staff members. A 16-year-old charity, the organization's stated goal had been ‘REVERSING THE TREND OF ASSIMILATION AND INTERMARRIAGE’…

‘The money needed to fund the programs of the Lappin Foundation is gone,’ the statement read. ‘It's with a heavy heart that I make this announcement,’ the organization's trustee, Robert I. Lappin, said.

‘The Foundation's programs have touched thousands of lives over many years IN OUR EFFORTS TO HELP KEEP OUR CHILDREN JEWISH’.
http://www.google.com/gwt/n?u=http:/...s/1046187.html

The Lappin Foundation described its aims thus at its own web site:

Quote:
OUR MISSION IS HELPING TO KEEP OUR CHILDREN JEWISH, THUS REVERSING THE TREND OF ASSIMILATION AND INTERMARRIAGE.

We accomplish this mission by providing a variety of programs for children, teens, parents, and others, which:

Enhance Jewish pride;

Convey the beauty, joy, and fun of being Jewish and THE RICHNESS OF OUR JEWISH HERITAGE;

Develop a connection to and love of Israel;

INSTIL A FEELING OF BEING A MEMBER OF THE JEWISH FAMILY, A GREAT AND UNIQUE PEOPLE…

IMBUE OUR CHILDREN WITH THE DESIRE TO STAY JEWISH AND MARRY JEWISH…

SUPPORTING INTERFAITH FAMILIES IN RAISING CHILDREN EXCLUSIVELY WITHIN THE JEWISH FAITH.
The Lappin Foundation

So, here we have a fabulously rich Jew contributing hugely to an organisation devoted to the preservation of Jewish racial identity.

And yet, throughout the Western world, the white man has been routinely demonised for attempting to do the self-same thing! And, guess what? It has almost always been the Jew who has been at the forefront of the howling chorus of indignation whenever that white man tried to stand up for his own. “Racist”, “fascist”, “Nazi”, “bigot”, “anti-Semite”, that’s what the Madoffs and their bought politicians and media darlings would label anyone who dared to stand out against the foreigners-are-better-than-you PC message that we have been hammered with in recent times.

Ask yourselves this, ladies and gentlemen: if we were to substitute the words "English", or "British" for the word "Jewish" in the Lappin Foundation’s statement of intent, and then tell the world that “our mission is helping to keep our children British, thus reversing the trend of assimilation and intermarriage”, what do you think this country's Jewish community would make of it?

Well, we know what they’d make of it because every race law ever introduced into this country was introduced at the behest of the Jewish Board of British Deputies!

You don’t believe me? Well, check this out:

On 17 December 1998, in a report titled: Response of the Board of Deputies of British Jews to proposals to amend the Race Relations Act, 1976, the Board of Deputies of British Jews issued the following triumphal communiqué:

Quote:
THE BOARD HAS BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPOSALS FOR RACE RELATIONS LEGISLATION IN THE UK…

The Defence Policy and Group Relations Division, which monitors the activities of political extremists and racists, HAS URGED SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS TO ENACT AND STRENGTHEN RACE RELATIONS LEGISLATION… IT HAS ALSO SOUGHT ALLIES AND MADE COMMON CAUSE WITH OTHER RELIGIOUS AND MINORITY GROUPS.

THE BOARD PLAYED A FUNDAMENTAL PART IN URGING UPON GOVERNMENT THE FIRST RACE RELATIONS ACT WHICH WAS BASED, IN PART, ON REPORTS PREPARED FOR THE BOARD BY PROFESSOR GEOFFREY BINDMAN AND LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL. SUBSEQUENTLY THE BOARD HAS PROVIDED WRITTEN AND ORAL EVIDENCE TO ENQUIRIES WHICH PRECEDED THE PASSAGE OF THE PUBLIC ORDER ACT 1986, THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT 1994 AND THE CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998...

There remains some scope for improvement… We draw attention to proposed 1B, which recommends that the Race Relations Act should apply to all aspects of the activities of Government and all Public Bodies. We would support the extension of the RRA to all government and public bodies. These organisations play a leading role in FORMING PUBLIC OPINION on social issues…

The Board can also see the case for NEW LEGISLATION to combat discrimination and incitement on religious grounds… We are also shortly to respond to the Government’s request that it might consider introducing specific legislation to outlaw HOLOCAUST DENIAL…

In addition to changes in the main body of national law, CHANGES ARE NEEDED IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS OF MANY INSTITUTIONS AND ORGANISATIONS to decrease or remove discrimination on religious grounds.
I Am An Englishman

So, here you see that what the Jew wants for himself (“imbue our children with the desire to stay Jewish and marry Jewish” etc.) isn’t necessarily what he wants for us.

This is what he wants for us: “Forming public opinion”, “new legislation”, “legislation to outlaw holocaust denial”, “changes in the main body of national law”, “changes…in the rules and regulations of many institutions and organisations” and “successive governments to enact and strengthen race relations legislation” etc.

You know a phrase that we are all familiar with these days is “political correctness”.

The PC Crowd are those who would always be on the side of Cool Britannia, as defined by treacherous, Brit-loathing globalists like Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson, (Mandelson's father was the editor of The Jewish Chronicle) and never on the side of the stable, proud, homogenous and secure British people as they used to be.

These are the folk who would call me all the routine bogey words if I were to say that I wanted to “keep our children British” but would NEVER criticise a Bernard Madoff for contributing to an organisation that wanted to keep Jewish children Jewish or, for that matter, for the financial horror that his fraudulent financial dealings have visited upon so many.

So, who are they?

Well, those most likely to supply the obligatory negative response to anyone who would put the indigenous Briton first in Britain would, most likely, be drawn from the following:

Most politicians and trades unionists; the civil servant jobsworth; the anarchic, loony-left, student and homosexual activist types who populate groups like the Anti-Nazi League, Unite Against Fascism and Rock Against Racism; high ranking freemasons; (30th degree and above) the opinion formers in the media and those with immigrant close up in their pedigree.

A disproportionate number of the PC folk listed in the preceding sentence would have Jewish forbears, so I suppose it’s not surprising that so many of those who first foist the notion of political correctness upon the world were, also, Jewish.

Before World War I, Marxist theory said that if Europe ever erupted in war, the working classes in every European country would rise in revolt, overthrow their governments and create a new Communist Europe.

But when, in 1914, war did break out, that didn't happen. Instead, the workers in every European country lined up to fight their country's enemies. Finally, in 1917, a Communist revolution did occur, in Russia. But attempts to spread that revolution to other countries failed because the workers did not support it.

In 1923, the Frankfurt School began to plan the destruction of western man through means other than outright war. The plan would soon become known as Cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism is better known today as political correctness.

Almost all of leading lights of the Frankfurt School were Jewish.

Check out the essay, Who Stole Our Culture, here:

I Am An Englishman

If Theodor Adorno, Georg Lukacs and the rest of the original Cultural Marxists were alive today they wouldn’t be condemning the capitalist mega-thief, Bernard Madoff.

Nor would they have a bad word to say about the rabid Zionists of the American Neconservative movement, who ensured that a reluctant world went to war with Iraq, or the so-called Oligarchs who robbed Russia blind during that country’s particularly bestial variation on the privatisation scam.

Oh no, ladies and gentlemen, Adorno et al would be doing their best to demonise me for daring to tell you that most of the Neocons, most of the Oligarchs and so many of the top folk who, along with Madoff, profited so obscenely from the de-regulation of the banking industry and whose avarice, ultimately, created the credit crunch, were Jewish.

Check out the Oligarchs in the essay, Boris Berezovsky here:

I Am An Englishman

And the Neocons in the chronological series of essays, He Fights for Them, here:

I Am An Englishman
 
Old January 13th, 2009 #10
Jack Black
Member
 
Jack Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 308
Jack Black
Default

The desire to disappear the Gentile didn’t start with the imposition of political correctness.

A hugely disproportionate number of Jews were at the forefront of the creation and implementation of the various revolutions and attempted revolutions that preceded the endeavours of the Frankfurt School.

The Jew, Karl Marx, published his Communist Manifesto in 1848. (The “year of the revolutions”) His brute ideology came to fruition in the great slaughter that was the Russian Revolution and its bloody aftermath.

In 1924, the year that Lenin died, (Lenin’s grandfather was a Jew) the three most powerful men in Russia were Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev, real names Bronstein, Apfelbaum and Rosenfeld. In his 1994 work, Stalin Against the Jews, Jewish writer, Arkady Vaksberg, says this:

Quote:
Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev, alone formed the 'leadership nucleus', and had every reason to expect to inherit the mantle of leadership from Lenin. The man closest to the 'troika' after Sverdlov's death was Grigori Sokolnikov.
Trotsky, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Sokolnikov and Sverdlov were all Jewish.

The murder of millions of innocent Russians that took place under the Bolsheviks was not the first occasion that Hebrew ease with idea of mass slaughter was demonstrated. One only has to look in the biblical books of Joshua and Esther to see how comfortable the Jew is with genocide.

Back in the twentieth century, Sigmund Freud’s mind-bending psychoanalysis and Israel Zangwill’s melting pot ambitions had already presaged the Revolution.

Edward Bernays’ ("the father of US public relations") efforts to hypnotise the masses on behalf of the elite began around the time of the Bolshevik uprising. The doings and sayings of the likes of these were already preparing the Brave New World that the "stay Jewish and marry Jewish" Madoffs were planning for rest of us.

The following statements are taken from Bernays' 1928 work, Propaganda:

Quote:
THE USE OF PROPAGANDA, CAREFULLY ADJUSTED TO THE MENTALITY OF THE MASSES, IS AN ESSENTIAL ADJUNCT OF POLITICAL LIFE.
Quote:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of organised habits and opinions of the masses must be done BY EXPERTS, THE PUBLIC RELATIONS COUNSELS; THEY ARE THE INVISIBLE RULERS WHO CONTROL THE DESTINIES OF MILLIONS… The most direct way to reach THE HERD is through the leaders… all this must be planned… INDOCTRINATION MUST BE SUBTLE. It should be worked into the everyday life of the people, 24 Hours A Day In Hundreds Of Ways…

A REDEFINITION OF ETHICS IS NECESSARY…

THE SUBJECT MATTER OF PROPAGANDA NEED NOT NECESSARILY BE TRUE.
I Am An Englishman

20 years before Bernays published Propaganda, Israel Zangwill created a storm in America.

He was the author of the most popular play of that year's Broadway season. Zangwill called his play, The Melting Pot. The plot of the play did not contradict its title.

Zangwill, a Jew, whose parents had previously fled Russia, was the leading "English" Zionist of his time.

In his 1921 book, The Voice of Jerusalem, Zangwill wrote:

Quote:
Men form one universal brotherhood… their individual lives, their nations and races, INTERBREED AND BLEND and go on to merge again at last in one common human… This conclusion was in fact the starting-point of Hebrew literature… this NEW WORLD ORDER would… reduce racial frictions to a minimum by the WORLD-POLICY OF THE OPEN DOOR… In particular, boundary questions could be denuded of their significance…

Bolshevism may be good or bad, but the United States of Russia would be in greater congruity with World-Peace than a swarm of conflicting nationalities; and if the Bolshevists can succeed in re-uniting them, they will to that extent be promoting the larger and truer ideal.
Love of the land? – No!

Love of country? – No! Love of family, neighbourhood and clan, pride in your British identity? No! No! No! The "world-policy of the open door" must be adhered to and you must "interbreed and blend"!

In his February, 1919, essay, Before The Peace Conference, Zangwill lets us know who will be running the show when the game is finally won.

And where the capital of the Order will be.

Quote:
If mankind thus builds a brotherhood, the immeasurable slaughter and suffering of the war will be redeemed, and THE PROPHETIC GOSPEL OF ANCIENT JUDAEA WILL COME INTO ITS OWN AT LAST...

Judaism stands to gain also a minor traditional hope from the Peace Conference: the repossession of Palestine, and if this secondary consummation could be united with THE SETTING UP OF JERUSALEM AS THE SEAT OF THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS, instead of the bankrupt Hague, the two Hebraic dreams, the major and the minor, would be fused in one and the Hebrew metropolis, that meeting-point of three world-religions, would become at once the centre and symbol of the new era.
If "mankind builds a brotherhood" there will be no more war?

Tell that to the 55 million who died in WWII, Israel, old son. And the Koreans, the Tibetans, the Vietnamese, the poor in South America and Africa, the Palestinians and Iraqis etc.

And a world government, with Jerusalem as its capital?

Hands up who fancies that?

Actually, it doesn't really matter whether you fancy it or not. You may have noticed that what the Jew wants the Jew does tend to get.

In the Collected Speeches, articles and letters of Israel Zangwill, we are told that the philosophy of "interbreed and blend" lined up for the rest of us, will not apply to Mr Zangwill or his own tribe:

Quote:
I say that without the vision of a League of Nations the whole world will perish… It is the vision of our own Isaiah... In such a world, if it emerges, WOULD IT MATTER IF WE JEWS DID HAVE A SINGLE NATIONALITY, if within all these leagued nations there was this STILL FINER CORE OF COMRADESHIP?… Instead of disavowing the brotherhood of Israel let us proclaim, from our Jerusalem centre, the brotherhood of man.
So, the Jew "interbreeds" the rest of the world into one happy-clappy, dumbed down, racially indistinct melting pot, whilst he still hovers benignly above the hodge-podge, a distinct "single nationality".

Does anyone out there think the Zangwill types will want to blend in with us khaki fellows when their self-serving visions are finally made flesh? Do you think they will be prepared to be dustbin men in this fawnly similar Utopia?

Or do you think they will still be giving the orders?

Check out the what others have said about the destruction of the white race in Interbreed and Blend here:

I Am An Englishman

On 19 December 2008, Stephen Foley reported thus in The Independent:

Quote:
NUMEROUS INVESTORS AND BANKS ACROSS WALL STREET REFUSED TO DEAL WITH BERNARD MADOFF FOR SEVERAL YEARS BEFORE HIS ULTIMATE ARREST ON FRAUD CHARGES, AMID WIDESPREAD RUMOURS OF SUSPECT ACTIVITY AT HIS BROKING AND FUND MANAGEMENT BUSINESS...

And in an explosive new revelation, Wall Street's chief regulator, THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ACTUALLY INVESTIGATED THE RUMOURS AND DISCOVERED THAT MR MADOFF HAD LIED TO ITS OFFICIALS – BUT GAVE HIM NO MORE THAN A PRIVATE RAP ON THE KNUCKLES...

INVESTIGATORS ARE HEARING NUMEROUS TALES FROM MARKET PARTICIPANTS WHO HAD LONG BELIEVED THAT MR MADOFF'S IMPRESSIVE TRACK RECORD WAS BEING FAKED. Astonishingly, many of these participants invested with Mr Madoff. According to documents sent to the SEC in 2005 by Harry Markopolos, the Boston accountant who first raised red flags about Mr Madoff in 1999 and finally got the regulator to launch an investigation more than six years later, several hedge fund managers who were funnelling money into Madoff Investment Securities said they thought the Wall Street veteran was ‘subsidising’ investment returns in down months and ‘eating the losses’ to make his results seem smoother and less risky…

The SEC... took extensive testimony from Mr Markopolos, who had told them years earlier that – most likely – Mr Madoff was running ‘the world's largest Ponzi scheme’. The conclusion was that Mr Madoff was indeed evading disclosure rules, and the SEC forced him to register formally as an investment adviser, which would open him up to regular inspections by the organisation – but IT DID NOT SUBPOENA DOCUMENTS OR DIG FURTHER.
Wall Street insiders had shunned Madoff for years - Business News, Business - The Independent

On 24 December 2008, The Evening Standard reported thus:

Quote:
A fund manager who killed himself after losing $1.4billion (£950million) in the Madoff scandal invested money on behalf of Europe's wealthiest aristocratic and royal families. René-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet was found dead in his office on New York's Madison Avenue yesterday morning…

A friend of Mr de la Villehuchet said:

‘He had been searching day and night for a way to recover the funds of his investors... It's a farewell from someone who had nothing to be ashamed of... The truth is that everybody wanted to invest with Madoff, who was considered by all as AAA or totally safe,’ he said…

The 65-year-old investor had locked the door, slashed his wrists and arms with a box cutter and bled to death…

News of the latest revelation in the Madoff saga come as the FBI has moved agents from anti-terrorism investigations in order to look into financial fraud because it poses ‘THE GREATEST THREAT’ to America.
Madoff suicide broker recruited Euro royalty | News

Will they be charging Bernard Madoff with manslaughter, do you think?

I know, silly question.

This is Madoff:

Check out the whole of this essay here:

I Am An Englishman

UPDATES:

On 18 December 2008, a week after Madoff was taken into custody, District Court Judge Gabriel Gorenstein reversed a magistrate judge’s order detaining Madoff and set bail at $10,000,000. He was thus able to go home.

Gorenstein is Jewish.

On 12 January 2009, Judge Ronald Ellis sent Madoff back to his Penthouse, against the will of government prosecutors, despite the fact that he had violated his bail conditions.

Madoff was found to have posted off at least $1m in jewellery and other valuables to family and friends whilst he was on bail. He was, thus, in breach of Judge Gorenstein's earlier order freezing his assets.

Ellis, however, ignored this and said:

Quote:
Aside from the bare assertion that there remains some risk of flight, the government has failed to articulate any flaw in the current conditions of release.
Ellis is black.
 
Old February 5th, 2009 #11
Curtis Stone
Senior Member
 
Curtis Stone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,057
Curtis Stone
Default

Hey, we were looking for this link in the thread "Can anyone prove that Jews run Wall Street?"


Get this, Jews do the work that the WASP firms (if any) don't want to do. When Jews do bad things and generate bad feelings, blame the WASPs!

In the 1970s, "hostile turnovers," notes James Stewart, "bore an unsavory taint. They generated bad feelings, especially toward those who represented the attackers. This sometimes alienated other clients. Much of the WASP investment banks and loan firms preferred to leave such work to the other firms, many of them Jewish." [STEWART, p. 25] "Various techniques and instruments were used in the Wall Street boom of the 1980s," says Norman Cantor, "but the most consequential -- and lucrative was the floating 'junk' (low grade) bond to provide capital for involuntary takeovers of one company by another ... Fiscal critic Benjamin Stein [sees] the junk bond device as a huge fraudulent Ponzi scheme generating temporary money pools that could be looted by ruthless investment bankers and corporate executives and their overcompensated lawyers." [CANTOR, p. 402]
 
Old March 22nd, 2009 #12
Joe_J.
Radio active
 
Joe_J.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gone to work on the lemming sites against Big Jew.
Posts: 9,439
Blog Entries: 2
Joe_J.
Default

When jews rule:
__________________
The average kwan is of such low quality that he'd shoot himself if he had any self awareness.
-Joe from Ohio
 
Old April 30th, 2009 #13
Brian Foley
Member
 
Brian Foley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
Brian Foley
Default 'Shylock' banned from Florida's statutes

Quote:
'Shylock' banned from Florida's statutes
TALLAHASSEE -- Citing Florida’s rich diversity, Gov. Charlie Crist signed a bill Monday removing the terms “shylock” and “shylocking” from state law, language dating back to William Shakespeare that is considered anti-Semitic.

“I think one of Florida’s greatest strengths, obviously, is our diversity, and the fact that we have such a strong sense of mutual respect for all races, all religions, all people,” Crist said.

The term comes from Shakespeare’s 16th-Century play, Merchant of Venice. The Jewish character Shylock is a loan shark who demands a pound of flesh as repayment from a debtor.

State lawmakers inserted the term, synonymous with loan shark, into Florida’s usury laws in 1969. The Anti-Defamation League urged lawmakers to repeal the language, arguing it reinforced negative stereotypes about Jews as “money hungry.”

“Shylock is dead, but Shakespeare isn’t really dead. We'll still be reading Shakespeare,” said Sen. Eleanor Sobel, D-Hollywood, who sponsored the bill. She added: “This state did the right thing by eliminating shylock from state statutes, which really is pejorative and demeaning to all Jewish people.”
LOL read the comments at the end of the article
 
Old April 30th, 2009 #14
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Sean Gruber
Default

Quote:
Citing Florida’s rich diversity,
Don't move to Florida. "Rich diversity" means dunghill.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old May 1st, 2009 #15
richyrichard
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 933
Default

Interesting that a term that has never had any other reference than to loan sharking is vocally objected to by Jews. Gee, I wonder why they feel so......refered to. The guilty man talks first.

Shylocking has to do with loan sharking, not to Jews. Funny how the Jews just natually take it that way!

Will Florida next ban the term, "shyster lawyer"?

How about Dickens', "Scrooge", who ran a counting house as a skinflint until he was converted? Shall they ban Scrooge too? Its titled, "A Christmas Carol". A what? A who? That sounds wonderfully, I mean horribly, anti-semetic!

Will they ban lampshades as well?
Bwahahahahahahaha

Last edited by richyrichard; May 1st, 2009 at 12:12 AM.
 
Old May 1st, 2009 #16
Brian Foley
Member
 
Brian Foley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Top End Australia
Posts: 282
Brian Foley
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgruber View Post
Don't move to Florida. "Rich diversity" means dunghill.
I prefer the term Mudville.
Quote:
Originally Posted by richyrichard View Post
Funny how the Jews just natually take it that way!
After the economic meltdown I say the Jews are a tad bit nervous
Quote:
Originally Posted by richyrichard View Post
Will Florida next ban the term, "shyster lawyer"?
They Jews in 2001 had the Jewfish renamed by law.
 
Old May 1st, 2009 #17
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Sean Gruber
Default Just in case

Just in case the Sentinel tries to censor or memory-hole the Comments, here they are. (Apologies for the length of this; but some of these comments are great.)


Quote:
Comments

oy.... this is sooooooo wonderful..... diversity is our strength

Posted by: shylock | April 28, 2009 at 05:45 AM


With the Ivan Boeskys, Michael Milkens, Jack Grubmans, Andrew Fastows, Gary Winnicks, Martin Frankels, Marc Richs, Pincus Finkelsteins, Sal Wachsals, Myron Fagans, Marc Driers, Yehuda Belskys, Saul Israels, Arthur Nadels, Bernard Madoffs, J. Ezra Merkin, the Edward T. Steins, how could any reasonable person conclude that Jews were money hungry?.

Posted by: Brian | April 28, 2009 at 08:20 AM


'rich diversity' huh?
How many multi-million dollar and multi-billion dollar scams do jews need to do to undo to shed the mantle of shylock?
You can outlaw the saying and talking about it and try to erase it from history, but (ya think Sobel is a jew?)but the actions of the race of people, which Brian above me cited a short list of scam artists from, their actions scream SHYLOCK, from the rooftops.

Posted by: billy | April 28, 2009 at 12:15 PM


It's not like the jews would fabricate a historical event such as the holocaust to suck every last penny out people who weren't even alive.

I wonder who made the most money from demolishing 3 skyscrapers in NYC?

Lechaim!

Posted by: Hayden | April 28, 2009 at 12:44 PM


Jews money hungry civilaztion destroying parasites? Who'd have thunk it? BTW. my wife earned her own money, it's not from my giant ponzi scheme.

Posted by: Bernie Madoff | April 28, 2009 at 12:57 PM


It's The Jews Stupid!

http://curtmaynardsnewestblog.blogsp...ws-stupid.html

Posted by: Curt maynard | April 28, 2009 at 01:47 PM


With the Ivan Boeskys, Michael Milkens, Jack Grubmans, Andrew Fastows, Gary Winnicks, Martin Frankels, Marc Richs, Pincus Finkelsteins, Sal Wachsals, Myron Fagans, Marc Driers, Yehuda Belskys, Saul Israels, Arthur Nadels, Bernard Madoffs, J. Ezra Merkin, the Edward T. Steins, how could any reasonable person conclude that Jews were money hungry?.

You forgot all the Russian Jews that screwed the Russian people out of trillions of dollars in the 1990s:

Roman Abramovich 14.7 (Sold Sibneft Oil and owns Chelsea Football Club) - Jew

Vladimir Lisin 7.0 (metallurgy)

Viktor Vekselberg 6.1 (petroleum, color metals) - Jew

Oleg Deripaska 5.8 (Russian Aluminium)

Mikhail Fridman 5.8 (Alfa Group) – Jew

Vladimir Evtushenkov 5.1 (telecommunications, finance, real estate)

Aleksey Mordashov 5.1 (black metallurgy)

Vladimir Potanin 4.7 (Norilsk Nickel).

Mikhail Prokhorov 4.7 (color metals)

Vagit Alekperov 4.1 (petroleum (LUKoil))

Viktor Rashnikov 3.6 (black metallurgy)

German Khan 3.5 (petroleum, finances, telecom)

Boris Ivanishvili 3.0 (metellurgy, finances) – Jew?

Alexamder Abramov 2.9 (black metallurgy) – Jew

Aleksei Kuzmichev 2.7 (petroleum, finances, telecom)

Suleiman Kerimov 2.6 (investor)

Vladimir Bogdanov 2.3 (petroleum (Surgutneftegaz))

Iskander Makhmudov 2.2 (color metals)

Nickolay Tsvetkov 2.2 (petroleum, finances)

Alisher Usmanov 2.0 (black metallurgy)

Mikhail Khodorkovsky 2.0 (Yukos oil)

Let's not forget

Vladimir Gusinsky 0.35 ( MediaMost)

Anatoly Chubais (Unified Energy System)

Yuri Luzhkov (Mayor of Moscow)
and Boris Berezovsky

Jews All

Posted by: Curt maynard | April 28, 2009 at 01:52 PM


Looks like this century will mark the conclusion of the 2000 year war between Israel and Rome, a war that Rome has only just become aware of.

Posted by: All Central Banks | April 28, 2009 at 02:09 PM


So the Shylock is calling the Jew a loanshark??

TJB!

Posted by: Ed in CT | April 28, 2009 at 06:24 PM


The Jews are the money hungery, theiving, retched scum they have always been and will remain this way until we cleanse the earth of there ways. www.thisismystruggle.com

Posted by: Skylockness | April 28, 2009 at 06:32 PM


Back in Henry Ford's day Jews were busy trying to get performances of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice banned from one end of the country to the other. Hollywood made a movie a few years ago starring Al Pacino as a sympathetic Shylock. I'm designing one of those looped "Bring Our Boys Home"/Breast Cancer" ribbons only this one looks like a little strip of twisted bacon. It going on my lapel to let people know I've got Jew fatigue.

Posted by: whodareswings | April 28, 2009 at 10:57 PM


So, the new term will be Madoffing.

Posted by: Pat Stetson | April 29, 2009 at 08:29 AM


What about anti-African words, like "niggardly", "the black plague", "pickaninny", and "moulignon"?

When they gone be erase from the language? Why jews get paid for the holocost and black people aint seen a dime for 400 years of slavery and oppression?

Posted by: Derjeron Nettles | April 29, 2009 at 11:26 AM


Dang Dejeronese! dat's right' WTF? and whys be calling are women's sheboons ands are mammy's as welfare recipients and chits. we needs to unifies for preperation checks, da days of da kikesters takins our pies is regergutating

Posted by: jackumup | April 29, 2009 at 12:42 PM


The worlds largest scam, the holyhoax(tm), makes the fitting term 'shylock' pale in comparison.........the blessing of jewi$h diversity, we are SO lucky..........S

Posted by: Shylock Hater | April 29, 2009 at 12:54 PM


Did someone say "Ponzi" scheme?

Doesn't that reinforce the stereotype that Italians are criminals?

I hope the term "Ponzi" is nowhere found in Florida statutes!

Posted by: Dave | April 29, 2009 at 05:56 PM


www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com

Posted by: John McGrath | April 29, 2009 at 08:17 PM


Why of course te term Shylock must be banned.Its just another little signal that might wake up some goody-goody,so-called Judeo-Christian,neoconservative flag waver,or politicaly correct liberal fool into waking up as to who runs the Western World and has been manipulating/robbing us and pushing for wars and always blaming others when there exposed. for decades! Lets all start wearing that bacon ribbon! P.S Obviosly Governor Christ is now hoping AIPAC,and the neo-conservative/fundementilist wackos in the dying GOP will give him a shot at the Presidency now.VE GOTTA DEAL FOR YOU!Oy-Vy!

Posted by: Europa Proud | April 29, 2009 at 09:37 PM


Taking offence at the comments or actions of others is just one way of attaining ascendancy over them. The claims are often as pernicious as the supposed offence, and serve to keep the pot boiling.

Of course, it relies on those who are accused being sufficiently sensitive to such accusations (however groundless they might be) but in a liberal society there will always be some fool ready to acknowledge the 'guilt' on behalf of the rest of us and, in consequence, maintain divisions. Someone will always be offended. Society should not feel obliged to jump at every accusation. Sometimes we need to tell the accuser that it is they who are bigoted and that to be a part of society they need to learn toleration.

Let me finish with this: I have known many Jewish people over the years and few if any of them would have thought to associate themselves with this absurd action. I take hope in knowing that it is only a small minority of bigoted zealots whose obsessive, inward looking actions smear the rest of their race.

Posted by: James | April 30, 2009 at 06:20 AM


How sad it is that the consequence of "diversity" and "tolerence" is censorship. Sure, it might mean little with one word in some obscure law, but the general principle is undenable and everywhere to be seen. Indeed, the UN admits it, and now, the US follows. Liberty is dead.

Posted by: Mike | April 30, 2009 at 07:41 AM


Why was the term "Shylock" in the law in the first place? Why did Shakespeare write the character?

Just senseless ignorance? Or perhaps they knew something?

Nah. Intellectual giants like Charlie Crist are smarter than Shakespeare. Generations of lawmakers were just fools compared to Crist's brilliance! Or so Jews like Eleanor Sobel would have us believe.

Posted by: Hyman Finkelstein | April 30, 2009 at 10:07 AM [This comment is particularly brilliant.]


Charlie Crist is a homosexual. Most Republicans who voted for him didn't know that. They didn't know it because the jew-controlled media hid that fact form the public. Therefore, is it any surprise to learn that Crist is pandering to the jews? We can be sure everything Crist does is overseen and directed by jews hidden behind the scenes. Just as all politicians are controlled today by the same jews. Remember, the jews control the media - thus they control public opinion - thus they control what people think about politicians and the issues - thus they control how people will vote. The jews have it all sewed up.

Posted by: Jim Younger | April 30, 2009 at 10:54 AM
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action
 
Old May 30th, 2009 #18
KMRATHELL
deken
 
KMRATHELL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,865
KMRATHELL
Default

"The JEWISH nation is the only nation that possesses the secrets of all the rest...there is no government in the world so completely at their service as America. "The British did this", the Germans did that", when it was the International Jew who did it..."the Americans are (now known as) a sordid, greedy, cruel people." Why? Because JEWISH money-power is centered here.

The genius of the Jew is to live off people, not off land, nor off the production of commodities from raw materials, but off people. Let other people till the soil; the Jew if he can will live off the tiller. Let other people toil at trades and manufacture; the Jew will exploit the fruits of their work. That is his particular genius. If this genius be described as parasitic, the term would seem to be justified by a certain fitness."

HENRY FORD SR.
"The International Jew"

Last edited by KMRATHELL; May 30th, 2009 at 11:22 PM.
 
Old June 30th, 2009 #19
albion
Senior Member
 
albion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,499
Blog Entries: 2
albion
Default


From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Winston Churchill, "Zionism versus Bolshevism", Illustrated Sunday Herald (London), Feb 8, 1920, pg. 5
 
Old July 7th, 2009 #20
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,375
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Some of World's top Crooks

Bernie Nadoff – An American Jew at the Wall Street, who skimmed US$65 billion of retiree funds, banks and charities – which he transferred into Israeli banks before declaring bankruptcy. He is sentenced to 150 in prison, recently.

Rabbi Eli Black – An American Jew businessman who controlled the United Brands Company. When cops closed on him – he jumped from a 44-storey building. He was allegedly shipped to Israel in a ‘closed casket’ alive.

Conrad Black – Owner of Canadian brewing empire – and later became the owner of 400 newspapers including the Jerusalem Post. He was caught embezzling millions of dollar and is enjoying his life in a country club prison.

Tom Billman – Charged with embezzling US$380 million, which he transferred to Israeli banks. He was caught in Paris while escaping US authorities. He was jailed but has been released secretly under Israel Lobby pressure.

Marc David Reich – A Belgium-born Jew, he was indicted for making millions of dollars through secret oil deal s with Islamic Iran. During his last days in the White House, Bill Clinton pardoned him for his contributions toward Hilary’s election.

Bernie Cornfeld – A Turkish Jew, who looted US$2.5 billion - and spent only 11 months in a Geneva jail for that crime. He is known for sexual appetite for Gentile Christian beauties.

Rev. Barry Minkow – Born into a Jewish family, he spent seven years in a county jail for embezzling US$200. After his release Barry left Judaism for Evangelism and now is Zionist Christian priest.

Ivan Boesky – A Jew who made a fortune of US$200 million by betting on corporate takeover by the Jewish groups. The case against him was dropped for too Jews from The Wall Street being involved.

Martin Flankel – He looted several insurance companies of US$3 billion, which he transferred to Israel. Currently he is enjoying his life in a country club prison.

Michael Milken – Born into an American Jewish family – he was sentenced for four years on 98 counts of racketeering and security fraud worth US$2.2 billion. However, he was released after two years.

Dennis Kozlowski – A Jew who was famous for throwing grand parties in Sardinia with “Male Model” entertaining the guests. He was convicted for looting US$560 million from Tyco.

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p...50#post1023550
 
Reply

Tags
gov, jew

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 AM.
Page generated in 0.21198 seconds.