Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 10th, 2017 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default #1 Linder Thread

This is an aspirational thread. But if I'm online, I will make some comments, feel free to chip in.

2017-04-15. I have moved this thread to This Just In.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 15th, 2017 at 12:03 AM.
 
Old April 10th, 2017 #2
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

11 April 2017

You Cannot Be Syrious

Following Trump and Syria, some points I have not seen others make, or emphasize correctly.

- misuse of vital interests. I've mentioned before I had a college professor yell at me for making this mistake, so I remember it. Vital means life or death, nothing short of that. Trump said we have vital interests in Syria. We do not. Our vital interest is avoiding a nuclear exchange with increasingly pissed off Russia.

- what is a man's response to Syria? A man's first concern would be to establish the facts. We know about the WMD lies that led to Iraq - and the deaths of a million Iraqis and thousands of Americans. It appears the (((left))) has learned the lesson, you dont even need to send SS Nimrat or some other clown to UN to harangue-lie, just present a few pictures. An American president acting correctly should hold his water until the facts are established. Trump, apparently listening to bad advice from his jew in-law and jew-convert daughter, decided to go the emotional route, like a woman or weak man. There is no proof anyone was gassed; there is no proof Sarin was used. Standing up at a podium and asserting that impresses no one. Men use a thing called pattern recognition. We have seen the (((left))) make up lies like this before, therefore until it is proven these people are not lying about Gas-Babies, it must be assumed they are. Just as they were lying about Incubator-Babies in Iraq. Russia and Assad both asserted they had nothing to do with the gassing, it occurred when stocks held by rebels (backed and supplied by USA and Israel) were bombed. This is the most plausible explanation. With the war close to being won in the field, Assad would not risk the one thing that would give his jewish enemies the ammunition they need to destroy him. The Americans and neocons have mere assertion on their side; actual credibility lies with Putin, Assad, and the Russian military, who are the only sober adult men in the picture. There is no reason to believe what American jews (and their goycucks) promote, and every reason to believe they are lying.

- I'm disappointed Trump listened to others rather than following his instincts. No president would have shrewdly remarked or hinted that the jews were probably the ones behind these threats to synagogues; if Trump is that hip to reality, he surely must understand the forces attempting to destroy Syria (and Iran...and bring Russia to heel), their motivation and long-term planning. Yet he goes with the obvious cheap false murderous emo-response.

- Vox Day hints Trump may be doing this as a ruse to cover a co-operation with China to do something about North Korea. I highly doubt it. There's seldom much more than appears to these things. The jewish agenda has been known for 100 years, at least since the Protocols, but actually since the Talmud. Rothschilds (today), Soros, the neocons, their tools - all indications point the same way, it's impossible to be confused about what's going on. The alt-right makes the mistake, as white people generally do, of not being specific enough. The problem is jews. Not neocons, zionists, globalists, those are all secondary, derivative, and continually to use those terms is politically wrong. The focus must be on the jew, "the world's foremost problem," as Henry Ford said 100 years ago. I don't believe it's 100% Trump has abandoned America First. He plays slap and tickle throughout his campaign, it's clearly a strategy of his, I think instinctive, to give and take. And that way of thinking also explains why he lets his advisors and subordinates go off at odds. He enjoys and knows how to work confusion and cloudiness. The key is what he actually does in Syria with regard to introducing troops. I believe Putin when he says next time there will be consequences. I hope Trump does too.

- what Assad and Putin must do is redouble efforts to destroy Isis, which Trump was in line with before the election. Once that problem is finished off, it will be far harder for International Jew to unseat the democratically elected and popular leader, especially with Russia's strengthened backing.

- Trump's generation has an obsession with appearing tough. Which is not the same thing as being tough. This is a non-jew aspect of the equation. People like Cat Lady Mattis and Mendace McMaster appear tough and hard-headed and credible to Trump and his generation's mentality, even though the reality is they are self-seeking liars. The jews and McMasters know the average America is a peasant-descended coward. He get vicarious Christabel Matthews-level leg-quivers from watching Our Paid Heroes blow up innocent people with fireworks. This proves America is Tuff. And since he's an American, he's tuff too. Football isn't back for another six months, so a nice new war would be great armchair entertainment, and the best thing for ratings too, from the fake-news (Fox + CNN) perspective.

- the bottom line is this affair reveals how completely the American government is controlled by jews. Until that control is openly contested, we'll remain at the level of frog memes. We need a political vehicle, not necessarily a party, but incorporating one at a point, that is both pro-White and anti-jew. Nothing less will do. As I said 20 years ago, remains true, there is no way out but through the jew. Trump never once made direct appeal to Whites. He did make direct appeals to literally every other group with more than ten members: jews, blacks, browns, sex deviants, etc. The age of proxies draws to a close. Trump has done more for the white movement, even against his intention, than anyone in two decades. The forces he ginned grow stronger daily - the time is ripe for someone to lead a physical defence force that in time produces a political-social party.

- Fake News. In theory media work like this: they give you the facts. They place them in context. Context means giving you pertinent background, if it exists. If you have a fire, there's no real context. But if you have something like the purported Sarin gassings, you would, if you were honestly trying to help the reader understand, explain that this sort of claim has been made before (and found bogus) - not just the Iraqi incubator story, later revealed a lie, but that a report appeared in multiple places in January of 2013:

Quote:
http://web.archive.org/web/201301300...ame-Assad.html

U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
Leaked emails from defense contractor refers to chemical weapons saying 'the idea is approved by Washington'
But this context is never provided by the lockstep media, the jew-controlled media, the lying media, the Judenpresse, the Luegenpresse, the junk media. Rather, it is dug out of the archives by truth seekers.

As I have said for 20 years, you have to fight the media for the story. The (((mass media))) aren't reporters but misleaders and obscurers.

A genuinely free media would report the claims about Assad and gassing, but it would dig into what was actually known versus claimed, and it would bring out the pattern at work - some force is trying to destroy Assad by making up lies about him. Who could that be? Well, a few dozen jews and a couple goyim signed off on a paper that talked about regime change in the middle east to the advantage of Israel - changing seven governments in five years. All accomplished save for Syria and Iran. It is obvious to the meanest intelligence that what is going on in Syria is a continuation not of this conspiracy but of this openly, publicly admitted plan. The neocons, the honest media would say, lost the election, but that doesn't mean they're not prepared to win the administration, and getting Trump to sign off on an unwarranted attack is a good first step.

But we don't have an honest media, we have a jewish media. It puts politics ahead of profits, as I have proved a million times over, though none acknowledge it. The media can advance the jewish agenda, and boost profits by stimulating wars-for-Israel, and getting Trump to bomb Syria based on false pretext shows the jews and neocons maintain substantial influence with a man who campaigned on the slogan America First.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 11th, 2017 at 01:39 AM.
 
Old April 11th, 2017 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

11 April 2017

Speculative Investments

I follow all kinds of things - gold, silver, BitCoin, stock market, sports. I'm interested in hearing what others think. Gold is currently around 1260, silver right at 18. BitCoin 1210.

I have one outstanding highly speculative investment for this year. I will announce it in September. It involves sports.

My belief is that the stock market is overvalued and will crash. That will be the time to buy stocks and real estate. I don't know when that will happen. The best source of information on the stock market are the various investor rich guys quoted and followed by lewrockwell.com - Doug Casey and the rest. Libertarians are continually mocked by racialists, but they have a much firmer grasp of certain things than racialists do. The point is not to try to time the market, most people who attempt that fail, no matter what they say, but to grasp the biggest picture: that the stock market is artificially distorted by the fed pumping money into the economy (which runs under 100 different names), producing bubbles - real estate, tech stocks, student loans, and on and on.

I don't think you can go wrong acquiring gold and silver. I don't know that they will appreciate significantly in the next ten years, but they will certainly retain some value. What I believe is close to 100% certain is that stocks are hugely overvalued. So long as interest rates are artificially kept low, due to the Fed, malinvestment-expansion will continue, but eventually there will be a crash.

As for BitCoin, I don't know whether it will go up or down, but as with gold and silver, I would tend to think it's likelier to go up. Maybe BitCoin won't be the winner, but some kind of de-middlemanned currency will be successful, in the long run. Here's is price history of BitCoin back to its inception in 2009.

https://99bitcoins.com/price-chart-history/

Contrary to what Nazis believe, speculation is good. Loaning money at interest rates is also good. The goal of this type of analysis is for us all to become non-fragile. Most fragility that isn't character weakness is financial. The (((left))) attacks our funding sources. We must become rich, because that gives us the footing for throwing real punches at the anti-White system. If you think knowledge is power, try money. Knowledge is merely necessary so that you actually know what you're doing, and have the proper orientation to know north from south; money is real power. And unlike formal political power, at the moment, it's open to anybody.

The jews are the richest group in America. Their view, as stated in The View From Sunset Boulevard, is that work just puts a roof over your head. But careful speculation makes you wealthy. I believe this is the right attitude. Take tips from winners, not losers. Of course, much of jewish wealth comes from controlling the system and gaming it, and nothing I say at any point goes toward anything but underlining the point that the white working classes (including anyone who works for a living) is being ripped off by jews controlling the money supply through the Fed. I am talking about honest speculation, where the losses are privatized, not socialized as with Goldman Sachs receiving hundreds of billions from ZOG after its failed investments.

In a White political system, money is used eugenically. So far from any positive program, this merely means that the value of money is not debased by politicians. So the man who works and saves can get ahead materially. And the man who doesn't - well, he'll have to find others willing to subsidize him. (Of course, we're talking about people who aren't impaired by something beyond their control, like physical incapacitation; it's easy enough to arrange a net for that small minority.)

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 11th, 2017 at 12:59 AM.
 
Old April 11th, 2017 #4
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

11 April 2017

The Verbal War: Free Market

It's better to use the term 'market' than 'free market.' Market means free market. Yes, there can be controlled or limited markets, but the essence of market is free exchange, even if boundaries are drawn. 'Free market' has become an ideological term, not a descriptive term. It is more often used to describe its opposite than the real thing - similar to the (((left's))) use of 'hate.' Health care is the perfect example. The ills of the system (the system is the actual ill) are inaccurately and dishonestly called/attributed to a free market. In fact, no free market exists. The government passes thousands of rules determining who can serve what to whom, and even forces the buyer to buy from a very small menu, these past few years. Then this mishmash of monopolies is called a 'free market' in order to encourage the suckers to misunderstand what's going on and go for the ultimate 'solution'-that-aint - single-payer socialism.

Nothing the federal government gets involved in is ever described neutrally or honestly. Rather you have to figure out what's going through thickets of verbal bramble and thorn. Always you are lied to, but if you grasp the end: taking your money and choices, you can soon enough grasp the means, some perfidious law, and its cover, some perfumed ideological cant.

We have a free market in health care, do we? Ok, just go out and rent a storefront in Flyover America. Announce that you can heal people. You will sell them vitamins, you will midwife their children, whatever you can actually do. You will be shut down in short order. You aren't allowed to heal people, EVEN IF YOU CAN, unless you have one of a various number of degrees. There is no free market. There is an extremely high barrier to entry for anyone seeking to offer his services. And this is just one barrier - there are hundreds of others. And so in the end, the supply is so ARTIFICALLY limited that you end up waiting a week and then forty minutes to an hour and a half before you are finally granted an audience with the System-approved medical pope.

This is the System we have. It is called a free market. It is not a free market, it is the opposite. It is called a free market so that the people who created this monstrous, self-serving system can consolidate and expand their control - taking, as I says, always, more of your money and your choices (freedom) in doing so. The (((media))) are always on the side of what makes government greater, and never on the side of restoring to the honest white man control over his own life and choices.

Whenever you see the term 'free market,' you should not respond like Pavlov's dogs, as the media intend, but should rather stay cool and evaluate the market in question. How free is it? 99.9% of the time it's not free at all. Can you walk into a store and buy Cialis? Or heart medication? Or steroids? Or antibiotics? Or cold medicine? Nope. Maybe the last, if you show a couple forms of ID to prove you aren't starting a meth lab. Yet we hear about "free markets."

People who hate markets love government control. They always imagine themselves as the controllers, and everyone else as the controlled. But it's better to let people make these decisions themselves. If they don't know what's best for them, then let them die figuring it out. To be a man, you must bear your own weight. Those who want to turn basic decisions over to government hate men. They hate white men. They see them, just as the jews do, as cows on a feedlot. To be scientifically controlled, manipulated and profited from. But our political cause is for White Men - and both of those matter. The cause cannot be reduced to the group alone, but must encompass the Man too. For we are both Whites and individual Men.

Markets are for the Man; anyone who argues against them and for government control must justify this against the loss of manly authority implicit in any such control system.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 11th, 2017 at 02:12 AM.
 
Old April 11th, 2017 #5
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

12 April 2017

Notes: Trump tweeted that Obama should stay out of Syria, and that he should have Congress declare war before acting. Both correct. Yet he observed neither the moment he got into office. I detest this kind of hypocritical inconsistency. It shows low character. ... Gold surged back into 1270s, closing just under 1277. Silver 1840. Kirk Cousins still unsigned, long-term, for Redskins, as draft approaches. (One of the more interesting NFL racial stories of past few years, altho a story not talked about.) Pentagon does nothing but lose wars, destroy America's reputation, and waste money. Fun facts I just learned: Moscow is the biggest Muslim city in Europe (2m); and there are perhaps 12 million illegal aliens (from central Asia) in Russia. I got these from the New Observer, which has been having troubles finding a format and staying up.

Political Correctness Has Never Yet Been Correctly Defined
I have explained it more accurately than anyone, back in the days of spintros. Dalyrymple, a British jew 'conservative,' in the ordinary jew-exculpating sense, has done better than any jewstream media commentator because he understands that PC is an attempt to destroy a man morally, from the inside, and turn him into a shell; - a dull-eyed repeater of lies on the outside in order to keep his job and social standing (or ration card in the old Eastern Europe). Many things Orwell had to say are relevant, although he wasn't discussing the thing directly. Joe Sobran had the terminological aptitude to observe the essence in question is best called Semitical Correctness, and I have honored him by using that term most of the time, whereas virtually no others do. We know the modern history, that the term originated with Lenin, meant deviations from the party line, and that it was resuscitated by (((Jeff Sheol))), a Brown cartoonist in the 80s who went on to become a Democratic party operative. We know that the term has never been accepted by the left, no more than they would accept anyone telling them they are a bunch of witch-hunting communists, a nasty mix of Anglo-jew cultists bent on destroying and dictating to the world. I will save the full and proper explication of the concept for my book, but I'm always alert for articles talking about PC, to see if they add anything.

'Ugly' Is the WASP's 'Hate'
Let's see what this guy has to say:
The Academy’s Assault on Intellectual Diversity Like most PC critics, we will know before reading due to source and probabilities, he'll complain PC goes too far, but he himself doesn't support any genuine argument. He'll affirm that racism is of course out of bounds among all right-thinking people. So he's a cultist like the rest of them. He's closed minded like the rest of them. He's just a tad less fervent. ... First thing we see, his use of 'ugly' to describe not the physical attack on Murray et al. but Murray's book and its ideas. Ugly is to Wasp-speak as hate is to jewspeak. The only relevant question from the rational pov is whether an argument is right or wrong, whether a fact is a fact or a lie. Hate is something the jew doesn't want to discuss, so he goes immediately after motivation, to foreclose debate. Same thing with the Wasp and 'ugly.' It's subtler, but it bespeaks the same desire: to keep certain ideas permanently off limits and ideally unthinkable. Its use is common among the high-minded WASP cult that exists at these higher-end private colleges the guy talks about. 'Ugly' ideas are rejected by high-minded, right-thinking, do-gooding Ladys Benevolent we all good little pinafore-wearing girls are supposed to be. We keep our minds on a higher level because we are Goodstons. This is the mentality. It's not like the jew mentality at all (looking for advantage, sticking together with your tribal fellow thieves) except that it overlaps almost perfectly when it comes to agenda. Same basic agenda, different motives and style. These two suppressive ideocrankisms come together on campus and drive all honest thought out or underground. More on this tomorrow. Two-three articles on PC have come out, we can take a look at them in coming days.

America Has Become Completely Jewish in Bearing and Behavior
Imagine the frustration of Putin. How do you deal with people who simply ignore facts? America has been totally jewed. Just assert things. Just lie. No need to prove anything. Attack the motives of anyone who opposes you. All the mass media do this. Every single one. They're in lockstep. Zero interest in facts. The only thing that matters is pushing the agenda and destroying anyone who gets in the way. The agenda is always anti-white and pro-jew. WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT ASSAD GASSED THESE PEOPLE? THERE IS NOT ONE SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE. A free media would start there. But we don't have a free press, we have endless lying jews and various goy stooges who cuck for them. Putin got smart and called the claims what they are - a false flag. And took the double step of warning US not to attack again and telling the world that this was probably just the first in a series. I don't know what Putin will do next if the USA continues its aggression, but it appears a showdown is likely. I'm glad I live in semi-rural Missouri rather than a major metropolitan area.

What Eminent Doctors Johnson and MacDonald Don't Understand That You Should
We should just step over it. Ignore it. Let it recede into history. That's their idea about how to cope with The Holocaust(tm). It is wrong. Why? Because the holocaust isn't history, it's propaganda - and it's not receding, it's strong as it ever was - see the reaction to Sean Spicer's comments yesterday. Propaganda is either effective or ineffective. Since the (((enemy))) controls the high points (mass media and all public authorities, including classrooms), he can broadcast and repeat his lies. But since holo claims -- all of them -- are lies, that's where we can fight back: with the truth. Just as we do on race and in every other area we are beset by jewish lies. The H is the propaganda basis on which the rest of the BS is built - ie, 'the minute you take race seriously, you end by gassing jews.' The Holocaust is the leader of a gang beating up whites; take him out, the rest will break and run. Everything jews say is bullshit, and to try to ignore their most egregious lie is flat stupid - especially when you have the proof and the jailed innocents who provided it.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 12th, 2017 at 05:03 AM.
 
Old April 11th, 2017 #6
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Donnie in Ohio
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
12 April 2017

Notes: Trump tweeted that Obama should stay out of Syria, and that he should have Congress declare war before acting. Both correct. Yet he observed neither the moment he got into office. I detest this kind of hypocritical inconsistency. It shows low character. ...
The bombing of Syria was stupid on a bunch of levels.

Who knows who used the gas? I'm sure Trump had the CIA, NSA, Homeland, everyone down to Inspector Clouseau giving him grim assurances delivered with the proper level of verbal gravitas that it was Assad. Word is Ivanka urged the Tomahawking of The Fightin' Alawite to her father "for the children".

The administration has been sending mixed signals as to the ultimate goal, with Trump saying he isn't interested in "Regime change" in Syria, and Tillerson basically directly contradicting him.

Troubling, but not freak out time.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old April 12th, 2017 #7
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie in Ohio View Post
The bombing of Syria was stupid on a bunch of levels.

Who knows who used the gas? I'm sure Trump had the CIA, NSA, Homeland, everyone down to Inspector Clouseau giving him grim assurances delivered with the proper level of verbal gravitas that it was Assad. Word is Ivanka urged the Tomahawking of The Fightin' Alawite to her father "for the children".

The administration has been sending mixed signals as to the ultimate goal, with Trump saying he isn't interested in "Regime change" in Syria, and Tillerson basically directly contradicting him.

Troubling, but not freak out time.
Of course even if Assad used gas, it's none of our business.

I just ask: why is only jews can set an agenda and stick to it? Why is this seemingly impossible for whites? Trump outlined exactly what should be done on most fronts, and now he's doing the opposite.
 
Old April 12th, 2017 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

13 April 2017

Notes: Ebook versions of 200 Years Together, Solzhenitsyn's book about Russia and jews, now fully translated into English. Gold surged into 1280s, ended at 1288. Silver closed 18.56. Remember those Italian guys busted for Holo-truthing? Update on them at Codoh. I guess they should have just stepped over it. I have not watched this, but it appears to be a video about jews and how they're messing up the world, based on E. Michael Jones's The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit: "
." Discusses SeeKut JooDayIs Non (Sicut Judaeis Non, the catholic church's policy toward jews lo these last 1000 years). SJN has failed, but Jones won't admit that because the church denies biology - by policy.

Racialists Too Often Don't See
It's not just race "they" or "the powers that be" or "ZOG" lie about. It's everything. Name one thing the USG does effectively? Manage money? We're 19,000,000,000,000 in debt. Run wars? When do we ever win? Defend the borders? We don't. Run a health care system? The cost has done nothing but spiral as government control has spread. Anything depicted by the government as bad is good. This starts but doesn't end with white men. It includes red meat, markets, businessmen. All depicted as bad by the government but actually good. Gigantic centralized government unmans the population: it takes all real personal authority away from the man and vests it in the state. Then there's the sexual element. The government destroys families by making their continued existence depend on the whims of illogical, easily manipulated women. Only those of exceptional character can keep families intact. Normal people mostly cannot. The second the woman decides she's unhappy, she has a full array of state agencies and laws backing her bad decisions, and forcing the man to subsidize them. This has led to the growth of MGTOW, which is quite an interesting development: a rational male response to The Legal Infrastructure As I Found It, is how I'd describe it. People say feminism is dead but in fact it is presupposed in all law now; it is the default assumption in society, in the middle class. Deferring to women is wrong, though. Women not submitted to men are a social menace, on the whole. There are women who can run their own lives, but they are a minority. We sometimes get obsessed with race to the point we miss certain things. Step back and look at society today - we the people basically exist to serve the federal government. It certainly doesn't exist to serve us. We are hectored and encouraged at every step to worship and support people we are already taxed heavily to subsidize. Every type of government employee is treated as a hero who has devoted his life to public service. Think about it. It's not just military. It's cops. It's teachers. It's firemen. We pay the salaries of these generally worthless occupations - and then we are encouraged to worship them on top of it. It truly is amazing how brainwashed we've become. Think about what we're missing. Before we had a giant centralized state, we had competent males in nearly all positions. Most of our daily lives involve mundane transactions. Imagine that every small task you needed to perform in public were handled by a competent white male family man. That's how society used to be. Even down to the grease monkeys, the soda jerks, the postal workers, the bank tellers. We had that. In that society, your grandfather, even if he were a semi-skilled just-off-the-farm basic worker could afford to buy land, set up a house, marry a woman, and have more than two kids. That's the world we traded for gigantic supersized jew-controlled federal government. Did we come off poorly in that trade? Of course we did. And that's why the government and its moll media (crook-nosed Brian Williams and the Beautiful Weapons, a children's classic) always lie about the old days. A giant supersized centralized state is inherently antiWhite, and this needs to be understood by more racialists.

Sicut Judaeis Non
The catholic church has a long history of dealing with jews, says EMJ. No. It has a long history of failing to deal with jews. When you doctrinally bind yourself against reality, which is what SJN does, you have set yourself up to fail. And, not that you care about it, since you don't, but if your cult dominates Whiteland, then you have set up whites to be genocided once jews have the tools to show the true meaning of SJN. And that is the story of the 20th century, continuing into the 21st.

Purity Spiraling
These days I read Daily Stormer, Occidental Dissent, Altright.com, Deadspin, The Ringer, Google news, Yahoo news, Vox Day's blog, Zero Hedge, and LewRockwell.com It's funny to see people who continually denounce purity spirals (ie, principled behavior) turn around and whine about Trump's flip-flopping. What do you think big tent means? Serious men determine their principles and stick to it. They don't hop all over the place and pretend they're clever. The principles that will protect whites are acknowledging that race is more important than party, position, cult, and that jews are our enemy. Embrace those and don't depart from them. That's the starting point for white activity. Even with his tergiversations, Trump has done more for the white cause, regardless of his intent, than anyone in the last few decades. Of course, the left has much to do with that: their hatred of whites has always been there, but it has become pronounced, public, ubiquitous, daily, after the St. Skittles affair a few years ago. Open, raw, racial hatred of whites can be found every single day in the lockstep media. Things are heating up, and the polarization that can serve us proceeds apace - if we take our own side. And that means being done with hopes and proxies. We need open pro-White, anti-jew leaders, speakers, lawyers, politicians. We need a white defensive force. We need white education since the public schools teach our children to hate themselves and despise their race. What we have is a fair amount of media agreed on the two main points: that whiteness is what matters, and that jews are the enemy. Trump is flip-flopping all over the place.

Downside to White Creativity
Evident in Christo-Enlightenment universalism. Whites use their creativity to build systems. This is generally bad. Because when these lofty nightmares are combined with a certain power of will, they bring misery to the world. The lesson is that math is universal, but almost nothing else is. We don't need a universal religion, we need limited respect for our ancestors. We don't need a universal politics, we need close attention to differences. "Love your race" is a simp meme. Our race needs not love but defense. We prefer to live among our own kind. That's it. To the little man, that doesn't seem enough. It is. White Nationalism can be a tent pole
structure. Fools deride it as abstract. Is it abstract when the enemy discriminates against us legally. Funny how no one ever has trouble defining 'white' until it comes to defending whites. We want to live among and around our own kind. That's our cause. Nothing more to it. We are denied this opportunity by law. That is not tolerable. We must do whatever it takes to reclaim that racial sovereignty.

300 German Troops Investigated for Wrongthink
Plenty of Germans must realize what's needed. [A] soldier posted a picture of a machine-gun on social media with the caption: “The fastest German asylum procedure, rejects up to 1,400 requests per minute.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 12th, 2017 at 11:40 PM.
 
Old April 12th, 2017 #9
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Donnie in Ohio
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Of course even if Assad used gas, it's none of our business.
Boom. You're channeling Tucker Carlson.Or the reverse. And the white working class who comprises the core of Trump's base, who are genuinely dumbfounded with the sudden belligerent tone towards Rus. If we have some sort of moral obligation to act in Syria, then there is a rather lengthy list of places we should be bombing daily.

Quote:
I just ask: why is only jews can set an agenda and stick to it? Why is this seemingly impossible for whites? Trump outlined exactly what should be done on most fronts, and now he's doing the opposite.
I honestly think Trump ordered the strike as a way to "demonstrate" that he wasn't connected to Putin more than anything else.

If Trump has done nothing else, he has driven the Marxist into the open. They declare their anti-White agenda openly and honestly. Absolutely astounding number of Jews at all levels of the entire SJW/BLM movement. Ditto the anti-Free Speech scum. Same crowd in the MSM ripping Trump to shreds every single day. Tapper, Blitzer, Chuckles Todd, Kristol, Krauthammer, Radditz, Bezos, Soros, etc. Endless list.

People notice that shit.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old April 13th, 2017 #10
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[between the lines]

The Academy’s Assault on Intellectual Diversity

By Robert Boyers MARCH 19, 2017 PREMIUM

"A university is among the precious things that can be destroyed." — Elaine Scarry, On Beauty and Being Just

It is tempting to describe the battles convulsing American campuses with epithets like "the politics of hysteria." Sure, but why not violent hysteria of hothouse pansies. More than a bit of hysteria was unleashed at Middlebury College this month, when protesters prevented Charles Murray from delivering a scheduled lecture. In spite of eloquent rebukes delivered by the college president and several prominent faculty members, some on the Middlebury campus defended the protest by citing the poisonous views expressed by Murray in his ugly and notorious book, The Bell Curve.

Typical chickenshit adjective user: poisonous, ugly and notorious. This is where I depart from WASPs. Real men don't use adjectives to counter arguments. They cite arguments, between quotes, and then they beat them into the ground using better arguments and evidence. The WASP way is contemptible effeminacy. It's the intellectual equivalent of a woman making eyes at you because you failed to observe some regulationlet of propriety.

Though it’s a violent instance of so-called free-speech controversies lately ignited on the nation’s campuses, the Middlebury incident doesn’t begin to reveal the depth or virulence of the opposition to robust discussion within the American professoriate, where many self-described liberals continue to believe that they remain committed to "difference" and debate, even as they countenance a full-scale assault on diversity of outlook and opinion. Well surely it at least begins to reveal the depth: these hothouse pansies can't handle argument. They can't even hear anyone saying things they don't like. They not only can't tolerate it, they raise violence against it.

Confront contemporary left-liberal academics — I continue to regard myself as a member of that deeply troubled cohort — with a familiar passage from John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty, and they will be moved at once to proclaim that Mill espouses what virtually all of us have long taken for granted. Of course we understand that "the tyranny of the majority" must be guarded against — even when it is our majority. Of course we understand that "the peculiar evil of silencing"— or attempting to silence — "the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing … posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: If wrong, they lose … the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error."

What can be more obvious than that? Of course we understand that there is danger in abiding uncritically with the views of one’s own "party" or "sect" or "class." Who among us doesn’t know that even ostensibly enlightened views cannot entitle us to think of those views, or of those who hold them, as "infallible"?

Shaming, scapegoating, and periodic ritual exorcisms are a prime feature of campus life. And yet a good many liberal academics are not actually invested in the posture to which their avowals ostensibly commit them. Mill noted among his own contemporaries, more than 150 years ago, what is very much in evidence in our own culture: that certain opinions have come to seem so important "to society" that their usefulness cannot be legitimately challenged. Thus a great many contemporary liberals subscribe to the belief — however loath they may be to acknowledge it — that certain ideas are "heretical" or "divisive" and that those who dare to articulate them must be, in one way or another, cast out. The burning desire to paint a scarlet letter on the breast of those who fail to observe the officially sanctioned view of things has taken possession of many ostensibly liberal people in academe, which has tended more and more in recent years to resemble what the Yale English professor David Bromwich calls "a church held together by the hunt for heresies." Which is properly described as a cult. The left operates as a cult, at least the non-jewish left.

When Mill wrote of the threat to liberty of "thought and discussion," he was responding, at least in part, to Tocqueville’s idea that in modern societies the greatest dangers to liberty were social rather than legal or political. Both men believed that the pressures to conform, and the pleasures associated with conformity, were such that these societies would not find it necessary to burn heretics at the stake. Mill explained:

And thus is kept up a state of things very satisfactory to some minds, because, without the unpleasant process of fining or imprisoning anybody, it maintains all prevailing opinions outwardly undisturbed, while it does not absolutely interdict the exercise of reason by dissentients afflicted with the malady of thought. … But the price paid for this sort of intellectual pacification, is the sacrifice of the entire moral courage of the human mind. A state of things in which a large portion of the most active and inquiring intellects find it advisable to keep the genuine principles and grounds of their convictions within their own breasts.

Sad to say, however, the expectations nowadays enforced with increasing and punishing severity in the academy are the basis for something rather more alarming than the regime Mill described. While dissentient views are today not always "absolutely" interdicted, and we do not hear of persons who are imprisoned for espousing incorrect views, we do routinely observe that "active and inquiring intellects" are cast out of the community of the righteous by their colleagues and formally "investigated" by witch-hunting faculty committees and threatened with the loss of their jobs. One need only mention the widely debated eruptions at Oberlin College, or Northwestern University, or others, to note that this is by no means a phenomenon limited to a handful of institutions.

The fact that these eruptions have drawn wildly inaccurate and misleading coverage in the right-wing media should not distract us from the serious implications of the kinds of intolerance promoted by ostensibly liberal faculty. Again with the adjectives. No facts cited, just prejudicial adjectives. Unmanly. Such show-trial-like events are the leading edge of efforts to create the kind of total cultural environment the critic Lionel Trilling described as built upon "firm presuppositions, received ideas, and approved attitudes." Here's where he should insert the interesting and true idea that the cultic left sees itself as the rebels rather than the System, and this warped mentality conditions everything they do and say. It has been this way for decades. It was like this, in academe, in the 1980s, and probably long before that.

What does such a total cultural environment look like? In the university it looks like a place in which all constituencies have been mobilized for the same end, in which every activity is to be monitored to ensure that everyone is "on board." Do courses in all departments reflect the commitment of the institution to raise "awareness" about all of the approved hot-button topics? If not, something must be done. Are all incoming freshmen assigned a suitably pointed, heavily ideological summer-reading text that tells them what they should be primarily concerned about as they enter? Check. Does the college calendar feature carefully orchestrated consciousness-raising sessions led by "human resources" specialists trained to facilitate "dialogues" leading where everyone must agree they ought to lead? Check. Is every member of the community primed to invoke the customary terms — "privilege," "power," "hostile," "unsafe" — no matter how incidental or spurious they seem in a given context? Essential. So college has been converted from an institution for teaching and study into cadres of commissars charging huge prices to convert students into a political bloc. Though much of the regime instituted along these lines can seem kind and gentle in its pursuit of what many of us take to be a well-intentioned indoctrination, the impression that control and coercion are the name of the game is really hard to miss.

Of course there are those who will defend the emergent total culture by arguing that we know very well how devastating bias and other forms of abuse or violence can be, and thus that we have an obligation to mobilize to prevent them. And of course it is impossible to deny that such things continue to exist, really? then give some examples and that efforts to raise awareness about them in an academic setting are indispensable. Even those of us who are worried about the future of liberal education, and about regimes of intolerance on the nation’s campuses, have often acknowledged that speech codes can be a good and necessary thing.

I’ve never met an academic — liberal or conservative — who believes that we should give a pass to racists who openly spread their poison in a classroom. What's poison? The idea that race exists? The idea that races differ in meaningful ways? The idea that whites exist as a race, are under legal and social attack, and should defend themselves? This guy belongs to the same cult he criticizes, like 99% of PC critics, he just wishes the commissars were 10% less strident. This guy's critique of PC amounts to "I should be allowed a modest demurral here and there, but fundamentally the cult is moving the right way and I'm on board."

When Donald Trump complains of the protocols and protections mandated to ensure that workplace and academic environments protect their citizens from flagrant abuse or intimidation, and declares these safeguards a laughable species of political correctness, we observe that he and his friends do not understand the relationship between freedom and responsibility, between open discussion and the civility that alone makes real discussion possible. How about giving an actual example?

But things have gotten out of hand. The desire to cleanse the campus of dissident voices has become something of a mission. Shaming, scapegoating, and periodic ritual exorcisms are a prime feature of campus life. Where does this behavior come from, historically? Jews and communists. A distinguished scholar at my own college writes in an open email letter to the faculty that when colleagues who are "different" (in his case, nonwhite, nonstraight, nonmale) speak to us we are compelled not merely to listen but to "validate their experiences." When we meet at a faculty reception a week or so later and he asks what I think of his letter, I tell him I admire his willingness to share his thoughts but have been puzzling over the word "compelled" and the expression "validate their experiences." Does he mean thereby to suggest that if we have doubts or misgivings about what a colleague has said to us, we should keep our mouths firmly shut? Exactly, replies my earnest, right-minded colleague. Perhaps only hated normal white males can appreciate free speech. Maybe that's their culture. And they are the ones who created these universities the jew-communists have destroyed.

In the last year or two, those wishing to restrain real talk or, God forbid, actual debate, more and more deploy terms like "entitlement" and "privilege" to suggest that people who stir the waters inevitably create a "hostile environment" and intimidate their colleagues, some of whom — so it is said — are thereby made to feel "powerless." Translation: we can't argue with you, so we're going to need you to shut up. It's not just a good idea, it's the code. And if you keep talking, we're going to attack you physically. Valid ideas, laughter and actual debate scare us, for we have grown up in hothouses, shielded from all wind. We need our safe spaces to blossom; cool free wind blows our petals right off. In this context, the term "entitlement" refers to people who have the confidence to speak with conviction and independence. The implication, unmistakable here, is that only those with power can speak, and that when they do so, they inevitably silence or strike fear into the hearts of everyone else, which includes the overwhelming majority of those who acquiesce in the established consensus. Not acknowledged in this scenario, though it ought to be obvious to anyone who actually values debate and difference, is that the "entitlement" belongs to all of those willing to speak out, and to take the heat, and to proceed without taking for granted that what they say will be applauded. The puerile notion that only those who are powerful and secure will ever feel entitled to speak out is one of those unfortunate assumptions promoted by those who want to be protected from actually having to confront controversy or discomfort.

Though it must seem odd to those who spend little or no time in the academy to hear that academic intellectuals are notoriously susceptible to groupthink, there are several compelling ways to account for this. For one, as Jonathan Haidt has pointed out in The Righteous Mind (Pantheon, 2012), academics are much like other people in "trying harder to look right than to be right" when they conduct an argument. Within the confines of a community that prides itself on its disciplined commitment to a consensually agreed upon set of "enlightened" views, deviations once regarded as signs of a robustly diverse intellectual culture come more and more to seem intolerable.

Though new ideas, new evidence, unfamiliar works may now and then briefly challenge the comfortably accredited views underwriting the official stance of academic institutions — think of the creative turmoil provoked by the writings of Thomas Kuhn, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, and Elaine Showalter a generation ago — the "confirmation bias" described by the psychologist Peter Wason will typically ensure that new ideas, no matter how compelling, will be received only in ways that confirm the enlightened consensus. A wide range of psychological tests conducted by Wason and others cited by Haidt provide no evidence whatsoever that the professoriate is any more likely than a less educated cohort to think independently, that is, to process fresh ideas and to draw from them anything but the officially sanctioned conclusions.

As Haidt notes, academics tend to have higher than average IQs, and are predictably "able to generate more reasons" to account for what they believe. But high IQ people like academics "are no better than others at finding reasons on the other side." This is especially troubling — or ought to be especially troubling — in the culture of the university, where diversity of outlook and ideas, and resistance to accredited formulas, is at least theoretically central to the institutional mission.

But academics today are increasingly behaving like members of an interest group, whose opinions they hold and value primarily as tokens of membership in the high status, politically virtuous elite to which they subscribe. It was once possible to suppose that this particular interest group — given its ostensible commitment to education — would want to promote genuine diversity of opinion, if only to weaken the confirmation bias we all share, "a built-in feature" of what Haidt calls our "argumentative mind." But ideological intolerance makes the confirmation bias seem to most academics not a danger but an entirely desirable feature of our collective enterprise.

The intolerance is disturbing in a variety of ways, and represents a threat to institutions of higher learning and to the work we hope to do as educators. But it is well to remember that, like other intellectual formations, our present troubles have a history. In the early 1950s, Isaiah Berlin identified what he called "a common assumption" informing the work of Enlightenment thinkers: "that the answers to all of the great questions must of necessity agree with one another." This "doctrine," Berlin argued, "stems from older theological roots," and refuses to accept any suggestion that we must learn to live with irresolvable conflicts. The consequence? John Gray calls it "a monistic philosophy that opened the way to new forms of tyranny."

The word "tyranny" is perhaps just a bit extravagant as a description of tendencies at work in the contemporary academy, and yet, when we speak of the attempt to create a total culture, dedicated to promoting a perfect consensus, we may well feel that we are confronting a real and present danger. The danger that context and complexity will count for nothing when texts or speech acts become triggers for witch hunts, and that wit and irony will be regarded as deplorable deviations from standard protocol. "Tyrants always want language and literature that is easily understood," Theodor Haecker observes.

At my own college, when a senior colleague at a public meeting last fall uttered an expression ("in their native habitat") felt by some to be "offensive" — though clearly not intended to be so, and followed by a clear apology when a complaint was voiced — there were calls for her to resign from the faculty. And though she is, and will remain, with us, the incident prompted a volley of abusive and self-righteous rhetoric, drove more than one faculty member to advise students away from courses taught by "that woman," and stirred a renewed emphasis on "re-education" and "rehabilitation."

Astonishing, of course, that those very terms — "re-education" and "rehabilitation" — do not scare the hell out of academics who use them and hear them. That they do not call to mind the not so distant history of authoritarian regimes in Europe, or lead on to the thought that "diversity," for many of us in the academy, has now come to mean a plurality of sameness. More important: The words, apparently, do not suggest how vulnerable we are — all of us — to error, slippage, and hurt, and how the protocols, tribunals, and shamings currently favored by many in the academy have distracted us from our primary obligation, which is to foster an atmosphere of candor, good will, kindness, and basic decency without which we can be of no use to one another or to our students.

Robert Boyers is the editor of Salmagundi and a professor of English at Skidmore College. His most recent book is The Fate of Ideas: Seductions, Betrayals, Appraisals (Columbia University Press, 2015).

Colleges aren't going to change because they're backed by feds who think the same way and provide the money. Students' parents must call the bluff of these marxists by refusing to put up money for their offspring to be indoctrinated.
 
Old April 13th, 2017 #11
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

14 April 2017

Notes: Gold just under 1290. Silver over 18.50. BitCoin 1174. "In the US for example, there are 100 million people capable of working not in the workforce and 45 million receiving food stamps." Nothing better than getting up before dawn on a spring or summer day.

The Basic Situation: Team White v Team Jew
Here on the so-called New Right. A few words about how we see "us" and how "they" see us. To the left, which is shorthand for jews and associated greedheads, whiners and criminals, including whiteskins I call maloccs (malocclusives), all whites are Hitler. They make no distinction between, say, Bill O'Reilly and William Pierce. We are just one lump negative. They attack us illogically but continually. On one hand we don't exist, as race is a social construct, but on the other hand we are history's bad guys, responsible not for all the material progress in the world but for everything the coloreds don't like about themselves and their position. The jews, who lead the left, believe literally everything in the world belongs to them. They believe they are the only true humans, and "even the best of the goyim should be killed." This is their religion. It's not just what they believe, it's how they behave. Others are to be used by them. Others have no rights, are worthy of no respect, can be undermined in any way that works. Coloreds working with jews lack the mental sophistication to grasp their own motives: they hate whites because they are objectively superior in nearly all ways. They want to take whites' possessions and kill off their kind. These are who we are up against. They cannot be placated because their hatred of us is racial. They hate us for what we are, and we can't change that. We either fight or die. Salon has a long list of white-positive legislation from Trump coattailers. The (((communist))) smear racist continues to be useful in cowing whites out of defending their interests. ... Who we are is what matters. We as I use it means self-conscious Whites who acknowledge jews are our enemy. Talk about the West or Christianity introduces fatal confusion. White nationalism is racial defense. The beauty of it - considered a weakness by some - is that it doesn't specify any internal arrangement but is purely focused on racial defense. Because that is what whites who value their kind and kin have in common: the need for a racial defense in a world that is increasingly hostile, discriminatory and downright murderous. Hence the concept Team White. We are not christians, we are not conservatives, we are here to proclaim our racial value and defend ourselves. In coming days I will write more about the rise of the marketer right. In a nutshell, as the first to advocate attacking conservatives rather than fraternizing with them, once that advice was followed by Trump, great success ensued. But don't disrespect conservatives - they are PROFESSIONAL MARKETERS. They saw the success of the uncucked right, and promptly moved in. I will write more about Cernovich, Vox Day, the manosphere etc as we move forward. As an example of growing anti-whiteism, here is the first time I've seen someone, an apparently whiteskin female, advocate taking the vote away from white males. Probably fair to call that a milestone en route to the hoped-for white genocide. There was a second milestone yesterday, on the road to complete cultural Untergang. That would be the female disco doctor arrested for performing multiple female genital mutilations. Of course, male genital mutilations are profitable business as usual in nearly all American "medical" institutions.

Great Risks Involved in Any Nuclear War with North Korea
The pusscons, or patriotards, get a thrill watching the US blow up the world. They are myopic cowards, with no real appreciation of the true cost of their puerile amusement.

Who Perseveres, Wins: The Kirk Cousins Story
Been following this for years. The upshot is that if you are a white man, and you dedicate yourself to your work, keep your mouth shut, you will end up in a good position in the end. Because most people are weak, fickle, easily distracted, and give up the minute they encounter opposition. Jews are notably stronger than whites in this regard, in fact they are much stronger. It is why they dominate - they work together and don't give up. We must do the same. The basic story here is interesting, whether or not you care about football. Kirk Cousins was a QB at Michigan State. He played in a pro-set offense. He was drafted in the fourth round by the Washington Redskins. In the first round, the Skins took the more successful Robert Griffin the Third, a black running QB from a typical sort of spread-scramble offense at Baylor. That is, an offense dissimilar to those run by pretty much all NFL teams. As emerged years later, the two-time Super Bowl winning coach of the Redskins wanted Cousins. But the owner, a jew named Daniel Snyder, loves black guys. He wanted a black, running, QB of the future type, and so he not only pushed for drafting Griffin III but starting him. Snyder loved to pal around with Griffin, and had a history of chumming it up with black free agents he'd overpaid yet who performed terribly, Albert Haynesworth being the most notable example. The Redskins, against the desires of the coach Shanahan, gave up a huge number of draft picks to get him. If Griffin didn't work out, the future would bleak for the next 2-3 drafts. In training camp, Cousins outperformed Griffin. As could be predicted since, as said, Cousins came from a pro-style offense and Griffin did not. But Griffin was the starter. It was written in stone. The first year, the decision seemed to be correct. Griffin, extremely fast, exploded on teams who had not seen him before. (You often see this: teams need tape to grasp how to defend new QBs - watch for Dak Prescott to decline in year two, altho not as badly as Griffin since his offense features lots of running, which puts less pressure on QB's ability to read the defense.) The Skins piled up a good record, and got into the playoffs. But Griffin, who had bad judgment, and was not capable of determining when to slide, or sliding correctly, got injured. And that was it. He never recovered. He came back slower. And still injury prone. And still heavily promoted by industry, ie Adidas and others. Coach Shanahan was blamed for sticking him in when he was already damaged, leading to a greater injury. Of course, Griffin demanded to be put back in, in the playoff game. If Shanahan had kept him out, he would have been blamed for that too. As in politics proper, blacks in sports are never held responsible for their decisions and behavior. Guilt is always pushed off on the likeliest or closest white target. So the two-time Super Bowl-winning coach is responsible, not the rookie QB. The next year, Griffin decided he was going to become a traditional QB. Sit in the pocket, read the defense, deliver the ball. But he couldn't do it. Most blacks can't. Not many whites can. It's incredibly difficult to be charged by 300-lb men and keep your eyes down the field working through your progressions. Cousins can do it. Shanahan knew that. But Shanahan got fired. Griffin was given every chance to succeed over three years. Finally the new coach hit the owner and said look, Cousins is better. Griffin cannot read defenses. He holds the ball too long. He's inaccurate. He's slower now. And he still doesn't grasp how to avoid taking hits when he runs. We need to start Cousins to have a chance. Finally the owner agreed. His black hero was let go to Cleveland. Cousins started, and the Skins had two winning seasons in a row, with Cousins passing for team-record yards. By staying quiet, offering public support for the black QB, and developing his skills, Cousins eventually was given enough time to prove that he could succeed. He hadn't done too well in the second season, when Griffin was injured, because it was his first real playing time, and he pressed too hard. In one game, he threw four interceptions. The media used this to bash him and claim he had no future. One persistent theme in football is that blacks have higher ceilings than whites. If whites make just a few mistakes, the media close the book on them. Blacks can fail repeatedly, and most of the media will say it's just a matter of tweaking things, they still have this racial athleticism and unlimited ceilings. The media are anti-white in sports, just as they are in politics. They want to drive whites out of the league, just as they want to drive them off the face of the earth. So basically the bigotry of the jew owner is the reason Cousins didn't start in year one, 2012, instead of Griffin, because he was better. Even the blacks on the team knew he was better. They stood behind Jay Gruden, the coach who replaced Shanahan, when he stood up for Cousins over Griffin. It's very discouraging to see that the better player on the practice field doesn't get to start. The average NFL career is only 3.5 years or so, and to maximize income, players need statistics their agents can use to wring money out of owners. Cousins delivers the ball very quickly. He's very smart, articulate, and selfless. Blacks knew that if he were QB, all of a sudden the line problems that were one of the elements blamed for Griffin's repeated failure, would clear up. In fact, the Skins have one of the best offensive lines in the league, and probably the best OL coach, Bill Callahan. But blame is always shifted off the deserving black onto the underserving white other(s). Blacks knew Cousins was playing better in practice, and he would get them the ball so they'd get their numbers and their contracts. So when Cousins finally replaced Griffin for good, the team's whole mentality cleared up. The best players should play. All serious athletes, of any race, feel this way. It's just basic honesty. But the way to look at it is that there should have been open competition for QB on day one, but since there wasn't, Kirk Cousins has been cost at least a year of development. After his first good year, going 9-7 and taking team to playoffs, the Skins could have tried to lock Cousins up long-term. But they didn't. They wanted more proof. They had given black Griffin chance after chance, but Cousins had to prove himself. They franchise-tagged him, so his contract went from 600k to roughly 20 million. He backed up his 2015 with great numbers in 2016. But now he had the power. Clearly at least an above average QB, if not a truly elite one, he knew that he could call his shots. The Skins again tried to lowball him, he laughed. They franchise-tagged him again. This year he'll play for 24m. And he'll be a free agent after the season. The Skins' jewish lack of faith in their QB will cost them hugely. If they don't pay Cousins 25-30m a year for five years, someone else will. But the jewish owner willing to pay a black cornerback 75m or DL 100+m, is unwilling to put out serious money for the best QB his team has had in 20 years. And since he's a jew, his racial bias against whites goes unmentioned in the media. But it is the operative element through this whole drama. Cousins is a believing christian. He has married his girlfriend. He has just had or is about to have his first child. He commits. He famously blocks his time out into fifteen-minute increments. Total commitment, Tom Brady-level, to being the best QB he can be. He is not perfect. He has shown some panic under pressure. But it's a lot easier to believe that he has more upside than that the Skins can go out and get someone better. Since at no point have the Skins defended his interests, he is quite right to push for the maximum contract he can obtain. I believe he sees it like this: I committed to my girlfriend, and I want the team to marry me. It's only fair based on my performance. If the Skins don't give him a long-term contract, he will probably go off to San Francisco, and play with Mike Shanahan's son Kyle, who used to be the with Skins when his father was there. So all the white men who were involved with this story have gone on to prosper, while the black and jew have done nothing but go backward. The much heralded Griffin is probably out of the league - just another running black QB who can't read defenses. Shanahan, who was abused with great vigor by the jewsmedia, has been proved right in his estimation of Kirk Cousins; his son, who like the father, was blamed for Griffin's failure, has gone on to lead the offense of a team that made the Super Bowl (Atlanta), and now has his first head coaching job as a result. Kirk Cousins has two seasons of passing records, and will within two years sign a contract for over 100 million. Cousins always kept his mouth shut and supported Griffin when he was the starter. He has been unfailingly straight and honest in the media. In the end, we see the triumph of a good man, and it's a real pleasure. Meanwhile, those of us on the outside should never stop talking about jewish bigotry wherever it appears (wherevere jews are, as their loxism is their very soul) because the controlled media will never mention it. Now I'm not a sports fan, I follow it for investment purposes and political purposes. But our 2017 investment will involve the Redskins. As I said, I will tell you it on September first, or right around there.

Latest Anti-White Movies: Detroit (2017) and Get Out (2017)
Written by jew Boal, blaming whites for nigger riot back in sixties. "Get Out" is by negro Peele, it's a horror movie and boring one. Even white liberals can't be trusted is its message. Good movie I saw recently is Touching the Void (2003). It's about two Brits who climbed a difficult peak in South America and had, uh, problems. Very serious problems. I particularly like that the guy who got out of the roughest situation was an apostate Catholic. In his time of deepest need, did he retreat to The Lord(tm)? He did not. He saved himself. For he had graduated from a christian to a man.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 14th, 2017 at 01:10 AM.
 
Old April 14th, 2017 #12
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

15 April 2017

Notes: Gold 1280s. Silver 18. BitCoin 1180. Namibia (old German SW Africa) says whites must give 25% of businesses to blacks. Cernovich threatens many life-destroying scoops if Bannon fired. Spencer paid to rent room (700) and security (2200) but Auburn still canceled his speech, says he will show up there anyway (2017-04-18). Trump's words have led to drop in border apprehensions, as mexes fear deportation and don't come or self-deport. Holy week visits from mexes to South Padre have also dropped substantially, presumably for same reason. Christian fools and tools, to be redundant, have helped drive their cult nearly completely out of the middle east. Amazon cuts affiliate income by 50%; at same time, nearly all youtube content producers who aren't leftists have had their videos demonetized. The left will do anything to prevent the views of the normal majority from receiving the ad money their eyeballs would naturally draw in a free market. In Arkansas, judge interferes with solid plan to execute a bunch of scumbags. Finally, there was giant new spider species discovered in Mexico, in caves of Baja. See New Species thread.

Everything the Feds Do Is Wrong and Bad
They distort the housing market in Vegas. Because Fannie and Freddie weren’t allowed to fail, it has taken years for these mortgage wards of the state to smell the delinquent mortgage coffee. The GSAs have finally decided to make a rational business decision and sell their billions in bad paper. All the federal government truly does is subsidize things the market wouldn't. Niggers. Bad real estate deals. Useless, dangerous, money-sucking foreign wars. Everything the federal government does is a threat and a danger to the white man who is sober and works for a living. If the federal government didn't exist, the only people who would miss it are its own employees and clients - the parasites who live off white men who earn. The USA has no need for a central government, just as it has no need to be one nation. The states would do much better by themselves as independent nations.

Trump the Stroker
The Russian leaders, who, unlike the Western liars, speak the truth, have said clearly that Russia will never again fight a war on her own territory. The Russians couldn’t put it more clearly. Provoke a war, and we will destroy you on your own territory. That's PC Roberts. Trump increasingly reveals himself unprincipled, thin-skinned, and unserious. He seems to have the worst flaws of multiple generations. He has the "we have to show we're tuff" of the gapedest generation, the American dupes who fed jews control of the Whiteosphere by feeding the (((USSR))) enough materiel to defeat the SS Aryans. Then he's also super emo like a youngster, flipping around in response to whoever last caught his ear. Then again, part of his problem might simply be age. Very few people retain mentality flexibility into middle age, let alone out of it. Trump said the right things to win the election. He has now reversed course on nearly all of them. So long as white men remain clowns, unable to determine a solid agenda and stick to it, they will continue to be dominated by jews, who are the definition of a people who know who they are and where they're going. ... If you can pay attention, you can see the Russians are getting increasingly frustrated with Trump/America's brazen lying and refusal to acknowledge basic facts. Couple with a tendency to lecture all others in the world as though they are the children. It is the US who act like jews. More precisely, like special-needs jews. No one sees the US as the good guys any longer. All the (((USA))) does any longer is print fake money and use it to subsidize real bad guys, from Israel to niggers -- and go around the world telling everyone not interested in carbon-copying us to prepare to be democratized, which amounts to getting MOABed and depleted uranianum used on you till you respect the Slutwalk, the synecdouche for our diseased living-ways no serious person would call culture. When you lie long enough, do you forget you're lying? This seems to be the cuck disease. The USA has flattered and fawned over jews for so long, it has forgotten objective reality exists, and that others can perceive it. Washington is so arrogant and lost in its own hubris, that Washington does not understand that the years of clear as crystal lies about Russia and Russian intentions and deeds have convinced Russia that Washington is preparing the populations of the United States and Washington’s captive peoples in West and East Europe, Canada, Australia, and Japan for a US pre-emptive nuclear strike against Russia. Published US war plans against China have convinced China of the same. If not for war, what else is the change in US war doctrine for? George W. Bush abandoned the stabilizing role of nuclear weapons by moving them from a retaliatory function to a nuclear first strike. Then he pulled out of the anti-ballistic missile treaty concluded by President Richard Nixon. Now we have US missile sites positioned on Russia’s borders. We tell the Russians the lie that the missiles are to prevent an Iranian nuclear ICBM strike against Europe. This lie is told, and accepted by the puppets in Europe, despite the known, incontestable fact that Iran has neither nukes nor ICBMs. But the Russians do not accept it. They know it is another Washington lie. When Russia hears these flagrant, blatant, obvious lies, Russia understands that Washington intends a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia. China has reached the same conclusion. So, here is the situation. Two countries with nuclear forces expect that the insane fools who rule the West are going to attack them with nuclear weapons. What are Russia and China doing? Are they begging for mercy? No. They are preparing to destroy the evil West, a collection of liars and war criminals, the like of which the world has never previously experienced. This is what happens when a nation refuses to identify jews as the enemy of everything good and destroy them. Just how far do jews/Israelis dominate the USA political system? Anything short of "completely" would be a ridiculous lie. While the jews spin absurd conspiracy theories about Russian influence, the truth is this. Here Trump fapping over yids and Israel as his Easter message.

Jesus Didn't Exist
You don't need to be saved. No one can die for your sins any more than he can make you stronger by lifting weights for you. Try Richard Carrier's book, The Historicity of Jesus, for insight into the milieu in which the christian superstition developed. Essentially, everything christians claim is a lie.

Destroy the Goy By Sexualizing His Culture
Jews always do this, whether Weimar, Palestine, or USA. Here on Facebook cutting tens of thousands of pro-Le Pen accounts. Reality as jew-enforced fiction.

Miloptic Activity at Choad
Dick dick dick, suck suck suck. Is there anyone left in this country who can keep his glans out teh teenholes? So tired of this carpe dickem. CONTROL YOURSELVES.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 15th, 2017 at 12:22 AM.
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #13
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

I moved LDC to TJI permanently. Feel free to comment or pose questions. I like reacting to stuff. Tee me up, Scotty.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 15th, 2017 at 12:23 AM.
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

It occurs to me, I have about 100 invites to Gab. So if you want to join, I guess if I put in your email, you will be let on board pronto. So post your email here if you so desire, or PM it to me. I think that's how it works. I have used Gab for months, and for me it replaces Twitter 100%. I get the same amount of useful news, and I don't even follow 200 people.

Here are my Gab posts du jour.

Alex Linder @Alex_Linder
6 minutes
Many executions, few prisons. Few laws - but enforced with Dutertean harshness. This makes for civilization.

Stick cunts in stocks. Whip men till their back looks like a bloody bingo board.

"Penitentiaries" are an uncivilized form of torture invented by the miserable English. Close them.


13 minutes
All must be done to POLARIZE the white world between WHITE NATIONALISTS (#TEAMWHITE - those who put race first, second and third) and TEAM JEW, who is the leaders of the forces bent on destroying us. CONSERVATISM CLOUDS THE PICTURE AND CONFUSES THE PEOPLE - destroy it.


15 minutes
Attacking libertarians makes no sense, it's like a stallion attacking a gelding. Libertarians are eunuchs - they are useful & unthreatening. The ones to attack are the conservatives, for they are professional seducers and misleaders. They, not libertarians, are a true threat to white nationalism.


29 minutes
Traditionalism is wrong. Never be afraid to correct a mistake.


an hour
Remember there was a time when you didn't doubt the Holocaust?

Apply that same thinking to your Jebus. Go out and make an honest intellectual inquiry. Pretend jesus is a gas chamber in Nazi Germany - prove he exists.

You can't. The balance of evidence is entirely against it.


an hour
the fear is yours, the laugher is mine, little man


an hour edited
My grandfather was able to buy ten acres, raise four boys on it, do a little farming, have some cows, pigs and chickens and fruit trees. All for $12,000. He drove a truck, did other modest jobs. How was his America not better than what we have today?


an hour
Prediction: The future of white liberation involves teams of whites invading jewsmedia concentration points and mass-slaughtering the liars within.



an hour
We sacrificed money, leisure, life-quality, sex, large families - all so we could have a giant, jew-controlled central government.


an hour
Minimalism, MGTOW, white nationalism. There are many natural connections between these.


an hour
You don't need to be saved. No one can take responsibility for your sins but you. Jesus didn't exist.

Acknowledge these truths or remain forever a child.

#TeamWhite
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #15
Olaf Menes
Senior Member
 
Olaf Menes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 775
Olaf Menes
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I don't think you can go wrong acquiring gold and silver.

The best investment, especially if you are forced into 401K contributions to receive matching funds from an employer, a decisive financial strategy is to buy small denominations of gold or silver, because when the stock market crashes and wall street takes a dump, gold and silver prices shoot through the roof.

In an event of what Survivalists call, "Shit hits the fan" or "The end of all things as we know it"....such as a catastrophic natural global disaster or general instantaneous destruction of the power grid, most experts suggest that in the long term, all trade for goods will have to be done with a tangible medium,such as verified gold and silver,meaning your stacks of paper currency will be toilet paper.

Stocks are for getting wealth in the short term.Most major stock holders such as millionaires and Billionaires, can unload stocks instantly in the event they see a crash coming. The average stockholder? well, you can't even get your money out of a 401K without retirement age, or an lengthy paperwork hassle with a huge penalty if you are under 62.

Even if you hold stocks independently and need to sell them off in a short notice situation, try getting hold of a broker when the stock market is crashing. You will be left holding a statement that is worth about what the paper it is printed on.

A wise man once said....Who happened to be White....."You don't own anything,unless you can physically keep from someone else taking it".
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #16
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olaf Menes View Post
A wise man once said....Who happened to be White....."You don't own anything,unless you can physically keep from someone else taking it".
that's why survivalists are idiots. they cant hold anything. if there truly were a SHTF scenario, 99% of these clowns will die like the supposed unprepared. so keep bagging up them delicious lentils. utter waste of time. if the mad max scenario comes, fight it out and win or lose. i cant think of anything more boring or useless than survivalism. people who stockpile guns and lentils are plus-sized morons
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #17
Donnie in Ohio
Switching to glide
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Morrison Hotel
Posts: 9,396
Blog Entries: 11
Donnie in Ohio
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
I moved LDC to TJI permanently. Feel free to comment or pose questions. I like reacting to stuff. Tee me up, Scotty.
Ending his (wildly popular) show last night, many blocks of which could be written by VNN posters, (or at least the writers of VNNF Halcyon Classic) Tucker Carlson informed his viewers that "If you're a straight white man, the left hates you, and they want to see you dead". I'm paraphrasing here, he actually went on more about it. Remarkable stuff to hear.

Nationalism of every kind is on the march. Personally, I can't believe just how well things are going. Polarization Nation, baby.

Trump is chaos, and chaos is beneficial. I expect serious civil unrest this Summer.
__________________
"When US gets nuked and NEMO is uninhabitable, I will make my way on foot to the gulf and live off red snapper and grapefruit"- Alex Linder
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #18
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,352
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donnie in Ohio View Post
Ending his (wildly popular) show last night, many blocks of which could be written by VNN posters, (or at least the writers of VNNF Halcyon Classic) Tucker Carlson informed his viewers that "If you're a straight white man, the left hates you, and they want to see you dead". I'm paraphrasing here, he actually went on more about it. Remarkable stuff to hear.

Nationalism of every kind is on the march. Personally, I can't believe just how well things are going. Polarization Nation, baby.

Trump is chaos, and chaos is beneficial. I expect serious civil unrest this Summer.
yeah... tucker was always meh, but he's got a second wind. he seems to sense the change in things. i see his clips a lot of places. i heard he and coulter were dancing around the jew thing the other day. there doesn't seem to be a way to stop the polarization (which is ultimately good, tho the path will lead thru hell most likely). the left has been getting more confident and more anti-white for decades, and, as i've said, my opinion, it really picked up speed after the trayvon martin affair. open hostility. open racial hatred. absolute unwillingness to acknowledge proven facts. where can it lead but conflict? how does one deal with people who lie continually? there's no way. i'm not putin. i dont have nukes. but they seem like they're going to produce a nuclear war because they believe they can slam their holy Narrative down on any circumstance and produce the desired outcome. i think putin is going to shoot down our planes as his next step, if we try more tricks in syria.
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #19
Olaf Menes
Senior Member
 
Olaf Menes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 775
Olaf Menes
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
that's why survivalists are idiots. they cant hold anything. if there truly were a SHTF scenario, 99% of these clowns will die like the supposed unprepared. so keep bagging up them delicious lentils. utter waste of time. if the mad max scenario comes, fight it out and win or lose. i cant think of anything more boring or useless than survivalism. people who stockpile guns and lentils are plus-sized morons
Abet I don't recall my post saying anything about stockpiling lentils! They sound absolutely disgusting.
But then again, I heard a wise man say, "Who happened to be White"... "You will be surprised what you will eat if you are hungry enough."

I think people of that mind frame stockpile guns and ammo because they "Have seen too many Mad Max movies".

Of course, maybe if you live in, or near, population centers, cites and, shit.... hits the fan, having a few hundred rounds and a good rifle is probably not a bad idea. I certainly think it would work better
at quelling riots than some harsh words from the mayor!

Last edited by Olaf Menes; April 15th, 2017 at 03:35 AM.
 
Old April 15th, 2017 #20
Alex Him
Senior Member
 
Alex Him's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 4,932
Blog Entries: 216
Alex Him
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
people who stockpile guns and lentils are plus-sized morons
What should people stockpile?
 
Reply

Tags
alex linder, alinderblog.blogspot.com

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.
Page generated in 0.23155 seconds.