Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 23rd, 2008 #1
VanguardNewsNetwork
News Bot
 
VanguardNewsNetwork's Avatar
 
Woodpecker Kosovo

Russia’s not happy about the creation of an illegitimate, Muslim state in Eastern Europe: [Article].
David Duke on Serbia/Kosovo: [Here].


More...
 
Old February 24th, 2008 #2
Steve B
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 6,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoVNN.com View Post
Russia’s not happy about the creation of an illegitimate, Muslim state in Eastern Europe: [Article].
David Duke on Serbia/Kosovo: [Here].


More...

An interesting take on the Kosovo "crisis" by Webster Griffin Tarpley.

Quote:
Brzezinski Seizing Control
Over US Policy In
Slow-Motion Coup
By Webster G. Tarpley
2-23-8


WASHINGTON DC -- Events of the past few days indicate that the Zbigniew Brzezinski faction of lunatic Russia haters have now won the upper hand inside the secret councils of the Anglo-American finance oligarchy, displacing the hitherto dominant George Shultz-neocon faction. Although George Bush and his cronies still occupy the White House, the policies that are being carried out are coming from the Brzezinski left CIA machine. Brzezinski has returned to public prominence in recent months due to his role as top establishment controller for the Obama campaign. But Brzezinski is not waiting for the outcome of the November elections to take over key parts of the US government. Brzezinski and his left CIA allies are already moving to assert their strategy, even as the neocons and their characteristic obsessions are moved to the back burner. The probability of an attack on Iran or Syria is declining, even as the danger of confrontation with Russia, China, and Pakistan * all much more dangerous targets to trifle with * increases exponentially.

1. KOSOVO - The independence of Kosovo has opened a new crisis front in Eastern Europe, with the potential for very nasty complications in regard to Russia. This is the essence of the Brzezinski anti-Russian policy. Kosovo independence is of course a flagrant violation of all existing norms of international law, most notably the Helsinki CSCE treaty of 1975 which finally put an end to World War II by declaring that all borders in Europe were to be considered final unless and until any changes had been agreed through mutual consultation of the interested parties. Since the Serbian government in Belgrade is vehemently opposed to Kosovo independence, the unilateral actions of the US, British, and NATO are the very essence of international anarchy. The new regime in Kosovo goes far beyond the usual kleptocracy of NATO puppets favored by Brzezinski and his circles. The new regime in Kosovo is essentially the terrorist KLA, an organization devoted to gun-running, drug-running, and trafficking in human slaves. The KLA is a Balkan version of Al Qaeda, and both are wholly owned creations of the CIA and British intelligence. With Kosovo independence, the US, British, and NATO stand ready to use armed force to defend the right of a terrorist gang to assert sovereignty over a segment of modern Europe. The criminal obscenity of this policy could hardly be greater, but for Brzezinski all methods are legitimate provided that they increase tension with Moscow, and in that respect Kosovo independence is already a glowing success.

2. US EMBASSY, BELGRADE - The attack on the US embassy in Belgrade, Serbia by gangs of drunken students is a classic Brzezinski operation. The tactic of having an incensed rent-a-mob of swarming adolescent patsies attack the US Embassy in order to gin up a crisis is one of Zbigniew's signature specialties. During the time that Brzezinski was running the foreign policy of Trilateral puppet Jimmy Carter, there were bloody attacks on the US embassies in Pakistan and in Afghanistan, both countries that featured prominently in Brzezinski's arc of crisis theory. Most famous of all was of course the attack on the US embassy in Teheran, Iran, which led to the taking of hostages and the huge international crisis which helped to doom the Carter administration to extinction at the polls. If US diplomats or State Department personnel are taken hostage anywhere in the world in the weeks and months to come, this must be attributed to Brzezinski.

3. SPACE WARFARE - The shooting down by the Pentagon of a US satellite over the Pacific is a very provocative military stunt designed to intimidate both Moscow and Beijing, who happened to be Brzezinski's immediate targets. This reckless and irresponsible action has raised the specter of an uncontrolled arms race reaching into outer space.

4. SYRIA - Zbigniew Brzezinski himself, fresh from addressing a retreat of House Democrats in Williamsburg Virginia, is now in Syria at the head of a RAND Corporation delegation. The purpose of this mission should not be construed as peace in the Middle East, although some foolish observers may read it in that way. Brzezinski's goal is immediately to lessen Russian influence in Syria, including the closing of certain naval facilities that the Russian navy has maintained in that country. In the longer run, Brzezinski would like to turn both Syria and Iran into components of the ring he means to forge around Russia for the purpose of the strategic encirclement of that rival superpower. Zbigniew's argument against the neocons is, why attack Iran and Syria, when you can turn them into kamikaze stooges, play them against Russia, and get rid of all of them that way? Europe and China are destined to play similar anti-Russian roles in Brzezinski's playbook.

5. BUSH IN AFRICA - President Bush may not know what he is doing on his current visit to five African countries, but Zbigniew Brzezinski knows exactly what the mission is. The Brzezinski policy is to foment destabilization and chaos in Africa under the auspices of the new United States African command (US-AFRICOM), all for the purpose of driving the Chinese out of Africa. As Zbigniew announced on November 30, 2007 in the Washington Post, he intends to cut off Chinese access to oil, other energy sources, and strategic raw materials on the African continent. Since the Anglo-Americans control the Persian Gulf by direct military occupation, this is tantamount to a policy of driving the Chinese in on Eastern Siberia. Brzezinski believes that if the Chinese cannot get their oil from Africa, they will be forced to attempt the military seizure of Russia's oil wells in the Far East, where there is much oil and very few Russians. Both Moscow and Beijing know exactly what Brzezinski is doing in this regard. This is the kind of harebrained scheming by Lord Astor, Lady Astor and Sir Neville Chamberlain which helped to bring about World War II. The idea then was to play Hitler against Stalin and get rid of both of them that way. When that blew up in the faces of the British, the result was World War II. This time, it may well be thermonuclear World War III.

More here.

http://www.rense.com/general80/bz.htm
 
Old February 24th, 2008 #3
Keister Kicker
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Keister Kicker
Default

Keeping track of all the Zionist handy work that has taken place in the Balkans has always been a work out, glad Duke covered it so thoroughly this week, more on the origins of this conflict from the late great Dr. William Pierce below:





American Embassy Stormed in Serbia: Why are We Surprised?

By David Duke

No American, and I am no exception, can be happy to see an American embassy attacked and set on fire, the American flag ripped down and almost an entire nation hating the U.S. and the American people with every fiber of the their being.

But, looking at American history in Serbia, what exactly should we expect? Serbia has never been an enemy of the United States yet we have committed acts of war and terrorism against it. We have dispatched armies and invaded it, dropped bombs on civilian targets such as bridges, office buildings and power plants, and we have dictated what Serbia does within its own nation.

The present realities of Serbia and of Kosovo are the process of a long historical conflict. Kosovo is an ancient Serbian heartland that was conquered by the Muslim Ottoman Empire with the collusion of Muslim ethnic Albanians. Historical realities of the age old conflict can be reflected in the genocidal statements of the Prime Minister of Albania made in Kosovo in June 1942. At a meeting of Albanian leaders of Kosovo he said,
“We should endeavor to ensure that the Serb population of Kosovo be – the area be cleansed of them and all Serbs who had been living there for centuries should be termed colonialists and sent to concentration camps in Albania. The Serb settlers should be killed.” (Bogdanović, Dimitrije. “The Book on Kosovo”. 1990. Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, 1985. page 2428. and Genfer, Der Kosovo-Konflikt, Munich: Wieser, 2000. page 158.)
Indeed, Christian Orthodox Serbians have been relentlessly killed, suppressed and cleansed since the time of the Turkish Ottomans. The ethnic genocide of the Serbians by Turks and their mostly Islamic Albanian allies along with a state-sponsored mass migration of Albanians into Kosovo enabled their present day majority.

In the 1990s the conflict came to a head with ethnic attacks against Serbians rising to a fever pitch along with calls for Independence. The nation then known as Yugoslavia struggled against this separatist movement and a radical guerrilla war against Serbians began in earnest by the KLA, The Kosovo Liberation Army.

It is not America’s business to decide anything about another country halfway around the world. But the cadre of Jewish globalists who control American foreign policy decided that Serbia had to buckle down to what President Bush, Sr. once described as the “New World Order.” Serbia was not in the orbit of the New World Order’s agenda, so the globalists aided and supported in every way possible the KLA guerrillas while at the same time decrying its “excesses.” Who were these globalists behind the American war on Serbia? The war’s architects are listed by Reason Magazine in the May 2004 edition in an article written after the first year of the Iraq War, called “Temporary Doves” . In it Matt Welsh those who he describes as the “architects of Kosovo.”
Temporary Doves, from Reason Magazine May 2004 –Matt Welch
So it is of pressing interest to see what the architects of Kosovo, and its predecessor campaign in Bosnia, have to say about Bush’s controversial war. As luck would have it, there are recent books from three key Yugoslavia warriors: Madeleine Albright, the Munich-haunted Czechoslovak émigré who was the most influential anti-Milosevic hawk in Clinton’s cabinet; George Soros, the Munich-haunted Hungarian émigré and billionaire philanthropist who was among the earliest and most influential nongovernmental voices to urge military action against Serb nationalists; and Wesley Clark, the retired supreme allied commander of NATO who directed the Kosovo War.
What the article did not mention is that Madeline Albright, George Soros and even Wesley Clark are all committed Jewish supremacists. Although few Americans were even aware of it, even a man thought of as a Gentile, Wesley Clark, hailed from a “long-line of rabbis who were of the Cohen priest class.
Wesley Clark’s Jewish Roots
Ron Kampeas Special to the Jewish Times
SEPTEMBER 18, 2003 Washington
…Wesley Clark knew just what to say when he strode into a Brooklyn yeshiva in 1999, ostensibly to discuss his leadership of NATO’s victory in Yugoslavia.
“I feel a tremendous amount in common with you,” the uniformed four-star general told the stunned roomful of students. “I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son — at least five generations, and they were all rabbis.”
…Apparently Clark, 58, revels in his Jewish roots.
He told The Jewish Week in New York, which first reported the yeshiva comment in 1999, that his ancestors were not just Jews, but members of the priestly caste of Kohens.
The “national security” apparatus of the Clinton administration was so Jewish it should have been labeled Israel’s National Security team. In fact the major Israeli newspaper, Maariv ran a story called “The Jews Who Run Clinton’s Court” on September 2, 1994, in which it boasted of the dominant Jewish makeup of Clinton’s advisers and cabinet. It quotes a prominent Washington rabbi to the effect that the government of the United States is no longer a government of Gentiles. It bears repeating:

The U.S. has no longer a government of goyim [Gentiles], but an administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law connected with the term ‘government of goyim’ should be re-examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S.
The article boasts of their complete domination of the administration, and describes many top officials around the president, especially in national security and foreign policy as “warm Jews” upon whom Jews can always count to advance the Jewish agenda.
In the National Security Council, 7 out of 11 top staffers are Jews. Clinton had especially placed them in the most sensitive junctions in the U.S. security and foreign administrations: Sandy Berger is the deputy chairman of the council; Martin Indyk, the intended ambassador to Israel, is a senior director in charge of the Middle East and South Asia; Dan Schifter, the senior director and adviser to the president, is in charge of Western Europe;…
When warfare broke out in the mid 1990s between the Serbians under Milošević and the revolutionary Albanians in the Serbian province of Kosovo. Immediately the Jewish-influenced U.S. sided with Kosovo and waged a violent, yet undeclared war with Serbia. America’s Jewish foreign policy bosses then influenced Britain and ultimately NATO to go to war against Serbia.

An overwhelming, high tech American military force attacked not only the Serbian military forces within Kosovo and Serbia, but even bombed the civilian infrastructure throughout the nation of Serbia. City Bridges and power stations, civilian trains, and civilian buildings were bombed all over the country, even in the Serbian capitol of Belgrade. Such Bombings are routinely described by the Jewish media as terrorism when done by opponents of American policy, but when America does it, it is called “peace-keeping operations.” At the time it occurred I wrote about how sick to the stomach I felt seeing American bombs falling on a European capitol.

Imagine for a moment if the overwhelming Black majority in Washington, DC decided to break away from the United States and begun terrorist attacks and military operations to achieve that aim. Say the U.S. government moved to militarily block the revolt but a militarily superior nation halfway around the world then began to bomb New York and New Orleans and Los Angeles in support of the rebels. How would Americans feel about that nation? Perhaps in that light an American can begin to understand Serbian feelings toward us.

There a dozens of ethnic and religious wars within and between nations all over the world. America has no business taking sides and being involved in any of them. It is not our business nor in our real interests to do so.

Ironically, while we get involved in the terrible ethnic struggles around the world, America’s controllers are waging a self-destructive immigration policy that is relentlessly producing a multi-ethnic society which will inevitably produce the same dynamics of hate and violence that exist in so many nations with sizable ethnic and religious minorities. Ethnic conflicts are the primary source of wars and terrorism in the world, yet by allowing our borders to be open to massive legal and illegal immigration of non-Europeans the Jewish leadership of open immigration movements (read my articles on the supreme Jewish role in the open borders movement) are sewing the seeds of our own future conflict, of increased hatred and violence in the United States. In fact, the Jewish supremacists support massive non-European immigration as part of their ethnic “divide and conquer” policy in America just as they use divide and conquer today against Serbia and Russia.

Stephen Steinlight, the former head of National Policy for the largest Jewish organization in the United States, the American Jewish Committee put it very succinctly in an article for his fellow Jews,

For perhaps another generation, an optimistic forecast, the Jewish community is thus in a position where it will be able to divide and conquer and enter into selective coalitions that support our agenda. (see the entire quote and source in My Awakening and Jewish Supremacism)
You often hear from conservatives, “My country right or wrong.”

Yes, we love our country and our people whether they are right or wrong, but true patriots demand that our nation be right, not wrong. We demand that our nation truly acts in the interests of the American people, not in the interest of any foreign power or loyalty. Today, the most powerful foreign influence is Zionism and Jewish supremacism,, whether in serving Jewish economic and financial interests around the world or in putting Israel’s strategic interests in the Mideast or elsewhere over that of the United States.

America has become the enforcer of the Jewish-extremist agenda worldwide. Whether one speaks of the U.S. blackmailing of Switzerland to cave into the Holocaust bank extortion, American policy makers defending the Jewish Mafia, Oligarch robber barons in Russia, or the U.S. going to war against Iraq for Israel, or American support for Israel’s murderous invasions of Lebanon, or the planned Jewish Neocon war against Iran, America is thoroughly under the thumb of the Jewish supremacists.

They are initiating a new cold war and taking aggressive steps against Russia as evidenced by the placing of nuclear missiles on Russia’s doorstep because post-communist Russia is not fully under their control and blocks their control of the U.N. Security Council.

We have seen this process in other Eastern European nations who have emerged from the grip of Communism. The price Eastern European nations must pay for America’s support is their support for America’s war for Israel s in Iraq, and support for the Jewish-American agenda in the U.N. Jewish extremists have even used their power over NATO and the EU to blackmail Eastern European nations to make laws to imprison critics of Zionism as a precondition for membership, all in the name of fighting “anti-Semitism,” of course.

Here are some excerpts from two articles dealing with the issue:

As NATO Meeting Approaches, Light Shines on Handling of Jewish Issues
By Adam B. Ellick
NEW YORK (JTA) — Later this month, seven nations will clear a crucial hurdle toward full membership in NATO.
But as they embrace a military alliance that seemed unimaginable during the Soviet era, these nations — Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia — will remain under close scrutiny to ensure they follow through on promises regarding “value issues,” including how they handle Jewish affairs. JTA - 11.05.2002

Bush Wages Unsung Battle Against Global Anti-Semitism
By: Martin Tolchin and Susan Tolchin
March 12, 2007 08:04 AM EST
…The White House required East European nations that sought to join NATO to offer concrete proposals to combat anti-Semitism in their countries. “I have to give a lot of credit to the Bush administration,” said Rabbi Andrew Baker, director of international Jewish affairs at the American Jewish Committee. “A major decision in NATO enlargement has been dealing with Jewish issues. The U.S. has repeatedly raised these issues.”

Because they control American policy and the military might of America, they seek an American empire overseas as an extension of their power. This empire does not serve the interests of the American people in any way. It costs trillions of dollars and only makes enemies of half the world to the United States. Our Jewish-extremist controlled foreign policy in supporting Israeli crimes against Palestine resulted directly in tragedy of the 9-11 attacks.

Jewish supremacists lead and control the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the Federal Reserve, and are able to use these instruments to force nations to support Israel’s interests in the UN and in other international bodies.

They have gotten America involved in the internal affairs of Serbia in order to weaken a nation where Zionists have little influence, while at the same time make newly independent nations such as Kosovo, nations that must be completely dependent on U.S. military support and the thus dependent on the Jewish powerbrokers.

I do not believe in my nation right or wrong.

I believe that my nation should be right.

I believe that my nation must act for the true interests of the American people and not some powerful, extremist minority.

I believe that if America is free from the un-American influence over our American government and media, not only will the American people be free and much better off, but the world will be so as well.

It hurts my heart to see the American embassy be attacked and burned, the American flag being driven down to the mud.

It hurts even more to know that this has occurred because our great nation now embarks on policies against the best interests of the American people and against the best interests of many peoples around the world.

Let’s change America. Change is not simply to have a new set of Jewish-extremist advisers echoing Clinton’s years, nor should it be Obama’s international team headed by Dennis Ross, the same Jewish Supremacist who sabotaged the Israeli-Palestinian peace conference. Change will surely not come from the old set of Jewish extremists as evidenced by McCain’s carryover of the Bush, Israeli-First team.

Change can only come from Americans in all walks of life, in business, media, academia and government rising in a new consensus and demanding that America have the independence our forefathers fought, bled and died to win, an American government dedicated to the American people and not to any foreign power.

Let’s bring this truth to every American. Now.

DavidDuke.com






Hands Off Yugoslavia
By Dr. William Pierce
ADV Broadcast Date: 04-03-1999
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/040399.ram
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/040399.mp3

The national interests of the United States are not served by bombing Yugoslavia. Yugoslavia is a sovereign nation and should be allowed to govern its internal affairs as it sees fit. The idea that the United States is "saving lives" by the bombing is especially ludicrous. Also fallacious is that the idea is that the United States is concerned about how a nation treats its ethnic minorities. The Turks mistreat the Kurds, the Israelis mistreat the Palestinians, and many African nations are in continuous ethnic turmoil, but we are not bombing them. The only reason the United States is unhappy with Yugoslavia is that Yugoslavia is a European country which does not want to follow the directives of the United Nations and join the New World Order crowd.




Why the Jews Want War

By Dr. William Pierce
ADV Broadcast Date: 04-10-1999[
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/041099.ram
http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/ts/040399.mp3

Dr. Pierce further discusses the situation in Yugoslavia. He discusses how the New York Times reported the conflict between Albanians and Serbs before the Serbs became the media's ultimate bad guys and the Albanians became the media's innocent angels.

More Dr. William Pierce HERE




These zios pushed war on the Balkans








 
Old February 24th, 2008 #4
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve B View Post
An interesting take on the Kosovo "crisis" by Webster Griffin Tarpley.




More here.

http://www.rense.com/general80/bz.htm
The article is quite interesting.

Zbigniew Brzezinski like his close friend and former partner in crime Maggie Thatcher is a an extreme Rusophobe. I remember him back during the Bosnian war when he was calling for the complete annihilation of the Bosnian Serbs and even Serbia. He is of the opinion that the Islamic world and ZOG need to unite against Russia and Serbia. He uses conflicts like Chechnya and Kosovo to push his political agenda which is a one world government.
These people are extremely dangerous.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old February 24th, 2008 #5
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,162
notmenomore
Default

It seems we just never can get rid of these characters: more power to "democracy" in the Kwa. Here it is nearly thirty years later and Woody Woodpecker is still calling the shots.

I do recommend the worthwhile read of the entire Rense article. It begins to clear away the fog surrounding the origins of the "magic nigger's" magic. What's really intriguing is the simple fact the Brzezinski is no kike, nor is he particularly sympathetic to kike interests. Yet, he would use a nigger-tool to accomplish his ends...
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old February 26th, 2008 #6
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Quote:

Will American Empire End Before It Ends the World?
By Paul Craig Roberts

The hypocrisy of US government officials is boundless. On February 18, the US government inflamed Serbians by recognizing Muslim separatists in Kosovo, a historic province of Serbia, as an independent country. Two hundred thousand Serbs marched in protest and the US embassy in Belgrade was damaged. Is this surprising? No, not unless you are an official in the American Empire. The notorious Empire Neocon Counsel, Azlmay Khalilzad, Bush’s representative to the UN, declared: "I’m outraged by the mob attack."

What’s an embassy building compared to a province of Serbia, a province that stirs nationalist sentiments associated with the Serbs' long military struggles with the Turks? Had it not been for the Serbs, Europeans would probably be Turks.

To neocon Khalilzad a province of Serbia is nothing. It is merely real estate to be given away by US recognition bestowed on a break-away movement led by what some consider to be a gang of Muslim drug runners.

Secretary of State Condi Rice also found the Serbian response to the US giving away part of their country to be "intolerable."

Former Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke also sees no reason for the Serbs to be upset that America gave away part of their country. He explained away the Serbian protests by declaring: "The Russians are behind this."

We can understand why US diplomacy is a failure when we see our diplomats explaining that, had it not been for the Russians stirring them up, Serbians wouldn’t have noticed the loss of a historic part of their country.

Perhaps Kosovo should have its independence. However, the US government could not have handled the issue in a more provocative way.

Washington has been interfering in Serbian internal affairs since the Clinton administration. Told that Americans had to prevent genocide, few paid enough attention to Washington’s facilitation of the breakup of the Yugoslav state during the 1990s and to the Clinton administration’s bombing and murder of Serbian civilians in order to support Muslim separatists in Kosovo in 1999. Clinton used NATO as cover, but the bombing campaign was not backed by the UN Security Council. Bombs fell on Serbia for 78 days, taking out public infrastructure, bridges, factories, power stations, petrochemical plants, telecommunications facilities, markets, refugees, the Chinese Embassy and a passenger train. "Sorry honey, tell the kids I won’t be home tonight. President Clinton decided to bomb my train." Cluster bombs and depleted uranium were used. Clearly, the US government and its NATO puppets were guilty of war crimes under the Nuremberg standard.

Americans were told by an obedient media that the bombings were necessary in order to prevent Yugoslav leader, Slobodan Milosevic, from committing war crimes against the separatists who were stealing part of his country. After Clinton’s bombings intimidated the Serbian political establishment, Milosevic was turned out of office and handed over to the Americans for a payment of several hundred million dollars and delivered to the Hague for trial as a war criminal.

Milosevic represented himself at his trial and was more than a match for the trumped up charges. Unfortunately, he died in prison. Many believe he was helped on his way by an embarrassed American Empire unable to convict him.

What is the US government’s secret agenda in the Balkans? Why is the US government on the side of Muslims intent on severing Kosovo from Serbia? What is being served by creating a new Muslim state closer to Europe?

Whose interests are being served by Washington? Clearly, not our own. Or Europe’s.

And, please, none of that BS about "building freedom and democracy." As one of England’s most famous conservatives, Peregrine Worsthorne, wrote on February 20, America’s reputation as "the West’s conscience is fatally weakened."

Supposedly our time is the era of globalism and one worldism. Ancient European nationalities are dissolving into the European Union, a new super state. US corporations now have transnational interests devoid of any national loyalties. Yet, the US is hard at work dissolving a small Balkan state into even smaller constituent parts. Why is this happening? Why did Bush order US puppets in Britain, France and Germany to instantly recognize the historic Serbian province as a new Muslim state?

Is the new state of Kosovo, as rumors would have it, Richard Perle’s payoff to the Turks, or is the explanation that Serbia, like Palestine, Iraq, and Iran, lacking any international media reach, was easy for Empire Neocons to demonize in order to establish the precedent that Washington decides what territory belongs to who and who rules it. Clinton’s bombing of Serbia was a precedent for Bush’s bombing of Afghanistan and Iraq and now Africa and tomorrow Iran and Syria.

The day the Empire Crazies bomb Russia or China, we are all fried.

Be a macho super patriot, believe your government, help to fry the world. It’s the American way.
http://vdare.com/roberts/080224_empire.htm
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old February 28th, 2008 #7
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Some more pics of Serb demonstrations around the world.

Brisbane Australia


Chicago


Toronto








Zurich


Kiev
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old February 28th, 2008 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[Lind on Kosovo]

On War #252: Fools Rush In


February 27th, 2008

By William S. Lind

If the Balkans had an anthem, it would be that 1950’s doo-wop hit, “Fools rush in, where angels fear to tread.” The latest Balkan fools are the United States and the European Union, which have rushed in to recognize what Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Kostunica rightly calls the “fake state of Kosovo.” Why is it a fake state? Because there are no Kosovars, only Serbs and Albanians. Each group seeks to unite Kosovo with its homeland, historic Serbia or Greater Albania. An independent Kosovo has the half-life of a sub-atomic particle.

The action of the U.S. and the E.U. in stripping Serbia of Serbs’ historic homeland is both a crime and a blunder. It is a crime, first, because no one, not even the U.N., has a legal right to dismember a sovereign state, and second, because the narrative used to justify the illegal action is a lie. The stated justification is that the Serbs, under Slobodan Milosevic, were ethnically cleansing Kosovo of Albanians. As German courts have established, there was no ethnic cleansing of Albanians in Kosovo until NATO started bombing Serbia. After NATO launched its unprovoked attack on Serbia (Mrs. Albright’s splendid little war), the Serbs dumped the Albanians on NATO’s doorstep as a vast logistics spunge. That wasn’t terribly nice, but when you are a very small country fighting all of NATO, you do what you can. Ironically, after Serbia was forced to capitulate when Russia withdrew her support, NATO blithely presided over the ethnic cleansing of two-thirds of Kosovo’s Serbs by the Albanians.

In international affairs, blunders are worse than crimes, and two of the blunders contained in the recognition of Kosovo are likely to have consequences. The first is the creation of an irredenta, which guarantees another Balkan war. Serbia will never accept the wholesale alienation of one of her provinces. Like France after 1871, her whole policy will focus on recovering her lost territory as soon as the moment is ripe.

The second blunder is further alienating Russia, this time in a way she cannot ignore. If the U.S. and the E.U. are blind to the ghost of 1914, Russia and Serbia are not. The fact that Russia went to war to protect Serbia then puts pressure on Moscow to do so again, lest the Putin government look weak domestically as well as abroad.

Washington and Brussels scoff at the thought, but Russia and Serbia certainly have military options. A guerrilla war against European and American troops and police in Serb-inhabited portions of Kosovo is likely to occur spontaneously, at least at a low level. IEDs and sniper ambushes are easy enough to arrange. Belgrade can ramp it up by smuggling in shaped-charge anti-armor mines, dual-warhead RPGs and sniper rifles, along with Serbian special forces to make sure they are used effectively. If Europe responds with economic measures against Serbia, Russia now has enough petro-dollars to support Belgrade economically. If NATO threatens a new bombing campaign, Russia can up the ante too by sending Russian air defense troops and equipment to Serbia. The last time NATO bombed Serbia, Russia was too weak to respond. That is not true now, nor is President Putin for sale the way Mr. Yeltsin was.

The last thing the world needs now is a new Balkan war, with NATO and Russia caught in a contest of mutual escalation. Is there a way to walk this dog back? I think there is, if Washington and Brussels regain some sense of reality. They can do what Bismarck did in 1878 and call a conference. There, a solution could be negotiated that all parties might live with, even if none really liked it. One such solution would be to partition Kosovo between Serbia and Albania, with Serbia compensated for her loss of some of Kosovo by being allowed to annex the Serbian portion of Bosnia. The fact that both Kosovo and Bosnia are fake states would make such a deal all the easier. As the E.U. has already discovered, maintaining fake states is an expensive and never-ending business.

Fools rush in, but sometimes even fools are wise enough to back out again. Berlin, are you listening? The Congress of Berlin of 2008 may be as successful as the Congress of Berlin of 1878 in averting war in Europe.

William S. Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the Center for Cultural Conservatism for the Free Congress Foundation.
 
Old February 29th, 2008 #9
UND
Junior Member
 
UND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illyria
Posts: 192
UND
Default

Hail Hitler
__________________
"They are Nietzsche's over-men, these primitive Albanians — something between kings and tigers."
- Henry Noel Brailsford
Dardania+Albania = Arbenia
 
Old February 29th, 2008 #10
UND
Junior Member
 
UND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illyria
Posts: 192
UND
Default

Noel Malcolm The Guardian, Tuesday February 26 2008

"Kosovo is Serbia", "Ask any historian" read the unlikely placards, waved by angry Serb demonstrators in Brussels on Sunday. This is rather flattering for historians: we don't often get asked to adjudicate. It does not, however, follow that any historian would agree, not least because historians do not use this sort of eternal present tense.

History, for the Serbs, started in the early 7th century, when they settled in the Balkans. Their power base was outside Kosovo, which they fully conquered in the early 13th, so the claim that Kosovo was the "cradle" of the Serbs is untrue.

What is true is that they ruled Kosovo for about 250 years, until the final Ottoman takeover in the mid-15th century. Churches and monasteries remain from that period, but there is no more continuity between the medieval Serbian state and today's Serbia than there is between the Byzantine Empire and Greece.

Kosovo remained Ottoman territory until it was conquered by Serbian forces in 1912. Serbs would say "liberated"; but even their own estimates put the Orthodox Serb population at less than 25%. The majority population was Albanian, and did not welcome Serb rule, so "conquered" seems the right word.

But legally, Kosovo was not incorporated into the Serbian kingdom in 1912; it remained occupied territory until some time after 1918. Then, finally, it was incorporated, not into a Serbian state, but into a Yugoslav one. And with one big interruption (the second world war) it remained part of some sort of Yugoslav state until June 2006.

Until the destruction of the old federal Yugoslavia by Milosevic, Kosovo had a dual status. It was called a part of Serbia; but it was also called a unit of the federation. In all practical ways, the latter sense prevailed: Kosovo had its own parliament and government, and was directly represented at the federal level, alongside Serbia. It was, in fact, one of the eight units of the federal system.

Almost all the other units have now become independent states. Historically, the independence of Kosovo just completes that process. Therefore, Kosovo has become an ex-Yugoslav state, as any historian could tell you.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008.../kosovo.serbia
__________________
"They are Nietzsche's over-men, these primitive Albanians — something between kings and tigers."
- Henry Noel Brailsford
Dardania+Albania = Arbenia
 
Old February 29th, 2008 #11
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by UND View Post
Noel Malcolm The Guardian, Tuesday February 26 2008

"Kosovo is Serbia", "Ask any historian" read the unlikely placards, waved by angry Serb demonstrators in Brussels on Sunday. This is rather flattering for historians: we don't often get asked to adjudicate. It does not, however, follow that any historian would agree, not least because historians do not use this sort of eternal present tense.

History, for the Serbs, started in the early 7th century, when they settled in the Balkans. Their power base was outside Kosovo, which they fully conquered in the early 13th, so the claim that Kosovo was the "cradle" of the Serbs is untrue.

What is true is that they ruled Kosovo for about 250 years, until the final Ottoman takeover in the mid-15th century. Churches and monasteries remain from that period, but there is no more continuity between the medieval Serbian state and today's Serbia than there is between the Byzantine Empire and Greece.

Kosovo remained Ottoman territory until it was conquered by Serbian forces in 1912. Serbs would say "liberated"; but even their own estimates put the Orthodox Serb population at less than 25%. The majority population was Albanian, and did not welcome Serb rule, so "conquered" seems the right word.

But legally, Kosovo was not incorporated into the Serbian kingdom in 1912; it remained occupied territory until some time after 1918. Then, finally, it was incorporated, not into a Serbian state, but into a Yugoslav one. And with one big interruption (the second world war) it remained part of some sort of Yugoslav state until June 2006.

Until the destruction of the old federal Yugoslavia by Milosevic, Kosovo had a dual status. It was called a part of Serbia; but it was also called a unit of the federation. In all practical ways, the latter sense prevailed: Kosovo had its own parliament and government, and was directly represented at the federal level, alongside Serbia. It was, in fact, one of the eight units of the federal system.

Almost all the other units have now become independent states. Historically, the independence of Kosovo just completes that process. Therefore, Kosovo has become an ex-Yugoslav state, as any historian could tell you.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008.../kosovo.serbia

Firstly, why are muslim Shiptar sub animals allowed to post their garbage here when they are usually banned on all other NS forums on the net? They already have the mainstream media which promotes their agenda. There is too much democracy at VNN

As for Noel Malcolm, he is a well known anti Serb propagandist and chairman of the 'Bosnia Institute,' an organization dedicated to spreading quasi-scientific Bosnian muslim propaganda throughout the west.

http://www.bosnia.org.uk/

This pathetic propagandist and pro shiptar/NATO agitator has no Phd in Eastern European history. He was Foreign Editor of the Spectator and a political columnist for London's Daily Telegraph, two instruments of ZOG propaganda.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old February 29th, 2008 #12
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UND View Post
Hail Hitler
Yes, Serbia is the only country in the world where there are brainwashed people who think that the Nazis are evil.

As for Hitler it was your ZOG allies who made the comparison with Milosevic.

Quote:
Comparisons with Hitler

Meanwhile, UK Defence Secretary George Robertson has drawn similarities between Slobodan Milosevic and Adolf Hitler.

Writing in the News of the World, he said: "For over a year Slobodan Milosevic - the butcher of Belgrade - has been embarked on a path of ethnic cleansing.



George Robertson compares Mr Milosevic to Hitler
"With his murderous secret police and thugs in uniform, he has been killing men, women and children in Kosovo.

"Simply because they are Albanian and he is a Serb."

Mr Robertson said the UK could not stand idly by while "ordinary families" were wiped out.

He said: "We must learn the lesson of the early days of Hitler.

"Had we stood up to his tyranny earlier, the course of history might have been very different."

Mr Robertson said: "And so we had to bring Milosevic to heel, before the spark of violence erupted throughout the Balkans."

Another paper claimed Mr Robertson was preparing to send in the SAS to "take out" Serb war criminals in Kosovo
.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/306010.stm
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 2nd, 2008 #13
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default



Quote:
We bombed the wrong side?

Major General Lewis MacKenzie - Armed Forces of Canada (retired)


Five years ago our television screens were dominated by pictures of Kosovo-Albanian refugees escaping across Kosovo's borders to the sanctuaries of Macedonia and Albania. Shrill reports indicated that Slobodan Milosevic's security forces were conducting a campaign of genocide and that at least 100,000 Kosovo-Albanians had been exterminated and buried in mass graves throughout the Serbian province. NATO sprung into action and, in spite of the fact no member nation of the alliance was threatened, commenced bombing not only Kosovo, but the infrastructure and population of Serbia itself -- without the authorizing United Nations resolution so revered by Canadian leadership, past and present.

Those of us who warned that the West was being sucked in on the side of an extremist, militant, Kosovo-Albanian independence movement were dismissed as appeasers. The fact that the lead organization spearheading the fight for independence, the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), was universally designated a terrorist organization and known to be receiving support from Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda was conveniently ignored.

The recent dearth of news in the North American media regarding the increase in violence in Kosovo compared to the comprehensive coverage in the European press strongly suggests that we Canadians don't like to admit it when we are wrong. On the contrary, selected news clips on this side of the ocean continue to reinforce the popular spin that those dastardly Serbs are at it again.

A case in point was the latest crisis that exploded on March 15. The media reported that four Albanian boys had been chased into the river Ibar in Mitrovica by at least two Serbs and a dog (the dog's ethnic affiliation was not reported). Three of the boys drowned and one escaped to the other side. Immediately, thousands of Albanians mobilized and concentrated in the area of the divided city. Attacks on Serbs took place throughout the province resulting in an estimated 30 killed and 600 wounded. Thirty Serbian Christian Orthodox churches and monasteries were destroyed, more than 300 homes were burnt to the ground and six Serbian villages cleansed of their occupants. One hundred and fifty international peacekeepers were injured.

Totally ignored in North America were the numerous statements from impartial sources that said there was no incident between the Serbs, the dog and the Albanian boys. NATO Police spokesman Derek Chappell stated on March 16 that it was "definitely not true" that the boys had been chased into the river by Serbs. Chappell went on to say that the surviving boy had told his parents that they had entered the river alone and that three of his friends had been swept away by the current. Admiral Gregory Johnson, the overall NATO commander, further stated that the ensuing clashes were "orchestrated and well-planned ethnic cleansing" by the Kosovo-Albanians. Those Serbs forced to leave joined the 200,000 who had been cleansed from the province since NATO's "humanitarian" bombing in 1999. The '"cleansees" have become very effective "cleansers."

In the same week a number of individuals posing as Serbs ambushed and killed a UN policeman and his local police partner. During the firefight one of them was wounded which caused an immediate switch from Serbian to Albanian as he screamed, "I've been hit"! The UN pursued the attackers and tracked them to an Albanian-run farm where they discovered weapons and the wounded Albanian who had died from his wounds. Four Albanians were arrested. Once again, the ambush had been reported in the United States but not the follow-up which clearly indicated yet another orchestrated provocation by the Albanian terrorists.

Kosovo is administered by the UN, the very organization many Canadians have indicated they would like to see take over from the United States in Iraq. The fact the UN cannot order its civilian employees to go or stay anywhere -- they have to volunteer -- combined with recent history that saw the UN abandon Iraq after a single brutal attack on their compound in Baghdad and the reality that Kosovo, under the organization's administration, is a basket case, disqualifies it from consideration for such a role.

Since the NATO/UN intervention in 1999, Kosovo has become the crime capital of Europe. The sex slave trade is flourishing. The province has become an invaluable transit point for drugs en route to Europe and North America. Ironically, the majority of the drugs come from another state "liberated" by the West, Afghanistan. Members of the demobilized, but not eliminated, KLA are intimately involved in organized crime and the government. The UN police arrest a small percentage of those involved in criminal activities and turn them over to a judiciary with a revolving door that responds to bribes and coercion. The objective of the Albanians is to purge all non-Albanians, including the international community's representatives, from Kosovo and ultimately link up with mother Albania thereby achieving the goal of "Greater Albania." The campaign started with their attacks on Serbian security forces in the early 1990s and they were successful in turning Milosevic's heavy-handed response into worldwide sympathy for their cause. There was no genocide as claimed by the West -- the 100,000 allegedly buried in mass graves turned out to be around 2,000, of all ethnic origins, including those killed in combat during the war itself.

The Kosovo-Albanians have played us like a Stradivarius. We have subsidized and indirectly supported their violent campaign for an ethnically pure and independent Kosovo. We have never blamed them for being the perpetrators of the violence in the early '90s and we continue to portray them as the designated victim today in spite of evidence to the contrary. When they achieve independence with the help of our tax dollars combined with those of bin Laden and al-Qaeda, just consider the message of encouragement this sends to other terrorist-supported independence movements around the world.

Funny how we just keep digging the hole deeper!

Maj-Gen. Lewis MacKenzie, now retired, commanded UN troops during the Bosnian civil war of 1992.
http://www.g2mil.com/Jun2004.htm
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 3rd, 2008 #14
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,354
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Sweden rally against Kosovo's independence

March 01, 2008 1:38 PM

STOCKHOLM, Sweden-Hundreds of protesters Saturday gathered in Sweden's three largest cities in peaceful rallies urging the Nordic country not to recognize Kosovo's independence.

Demonstrations, staged by The Serbian Youth Organization in Sweden, began in central city squares in Stockholm, Malmo and Goteborg at 12:44 p.m. (1144 GMT), symbolizing U.N. Resolution 1244 which in 1999 formally recognized Serbia's sovereignty while simultaneously placing Kosovo under a U.N. interim administration backed up by NATO-led forces.

Police and organizers said around 600 demonstrators, mainly of Serb origin and backed up by many Swedish, Greek and Cypriot sympathizers, had rallied in the capital, while another 600 braved the cold and rain in Goteborg and 500 more in Malmo.

Sweden has not yet formally recognized Kosovo, but has said it will join the growing number of states to do so after a parliamentary committee meeting next week.

Serbia considers Kosovo its sacred heartland and has rejected Kosovo's declaration of independence.

Demonstrators carried Serb and Swedish flags as well as banners calling for the rescue of the U.N. and saying that Kosovo belongs to Serbia.

Jeremija Isakovic, a 32-year-old second-generation Serb living in Sweden, said "Kosovo is the cultural and historic cradle for Serbia."

"The way things are right now, one side has won everything, while the other has been totally degraded," he said. "There has to be a solution that both parties can sign."

During the Stockholm demonstration, police said they stopped and frisked around 20 members of the Swedish Resistance Movement, an organization linked to some neo-Nazi acts, who were on their way to the rally.

Police spokeswoman Ann-Charlotte Wejnas said they were equipped with cobblestones, bottles and golf clubs and were "making trouble."

One of them was arrested for assault, while another was arrested for resistance.

Wejnas added that police had also been forced to remove around 20 demonstrators from the heart of the city after the rally had ended because they had hurled fireworks at cars.
 
Old March 6th, 2008 #15
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Some of the jew enemies of Serbia

Government
Morton Abramowitz (advisor to albanian terrorists)
Richard Holbrooke (envoy to the balkans)
Madeleine Albright (secretary of state 1992-2000)
Daniel Serwer (US institute for war)
Tom Lantos(deceased)
Joe Lieberman (connecticut )
Dianne Feinstein (california )
William Cohen (secretary of defence 1997-2001)
Carl Levin (Michigan r)
Abe Bayer (deceased)
Arlen Specter (Pennsylvania )
Wesley Clark (nato commander and terrorist)
George Soros (billionaire terrorist sponsor and impeialist)
Benjamin Gilman (NY senator)
Douglas Feith (neocon)
Richard Perle (neocon)
Paul Wolfowitz (neocon)
Norman Cigar (Pentagon)
James Lyon (International crisis group)
Elliot Engel (NY)
Barbara Boxer (California)
James Rubin (Clinton spokesman)
Charles Schumer (NY)
Samuel Berger (Clinton adviser)
Bernard Kouchner (france)
Nicolas Sarkozy (france)
Ileana Ross-Lehtinen - Florida (Jew)

Media
Tim Judah (propaganda hack )
Tom Friedman (NY Times)
Richard Cohen (NY Times)
Roy Gutman (Newsday)
David Finn (Propaganda Hack)
Caroline Glick (Jerusalem Post)
Eric Margolis (Toronto Sun)
David Rieff (NY University)
Susan Sontag (deceased)
Philip J. Cohen (author "serbia secret war")


Chains by:
NY Times
Washingot Post
Izzy Asper
Conrad Black
Rupert Murdoch

Non jewish zionists
Joe Biden
Bill/Hillary Clinton
George Bush
Condoleeza Rice
Tony Blair
Dick Chaney
Patrick G. Moore (radio "free europe")
Noel Malcolm (auther "bosnia short history')
Jonathan Steele (the guardian)


David Gompert How to defeat Serbia?" (?)
James Gow - (???)
Daniel Goldhagen (jew)
Shlomo Avineri (jew)
David Rohde - Endgame: The Betrayal and Fall of Srebrenica(jew)

Ed Vulliamy (???)
Laura Silber Yugoslavia: Death of a Nation (jew)
Louis Sell (???)
Stephen Schwartz - Kosovo: Background to a War (jew)
Christopher Hitchens Kosovo: Background to a War (jew)-

more info at http://compuserb.com/sdl/
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 6th, 2008 #16
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
jewsign

Quote:
Maiden name turns into campaign issue

In politics, nothing is off limits -- even something as seemingly innocuous as a middle or maiden name.

Take Barrack Obama.

Republican talk show hosts are repeatedly invoking his middle name, Hussein, in an apparent attempt to connect him to the executed Iraqi dictator or Muslims. John McCain apologized earlier this week for such comments made by a supporter at an Ohio rally.

Now it appears to be U.S. Rep. Melissa Bean's turn.

Republican challenger Steve Greenberg circulated a news release Wednesday referring to the Barrington Democrat as Melissa Luburich Bean, adding her Serbian maiden name.

The news release blasted Bean for not supporting Kosovo's move to separate from Serbia and her backing by pro-Serbian organizations.

Greenberg defended the news release Wednesday, saying her maiden name was fair game and her support for Serbia is disturbing, especially in light of last week's attack on the U.S. embassy in the Eastern European country.

"I think ultimately when you run for office you are being vetted many ways -- your middle name and last name and you get called many names," said the Long Grove businessman. "If we are thin-skinned about it … we are probably in the wrong business."

Bean has a long record of supporting Serbian groups and Serbia's efforts to prevent a Kosovo succession. The position is in conflict with the official stance of the Bush administration and that of several key Western European allies.

The attack on the embassy was reportedly carried out by rioters upset with the U.S. support of a separate Kosovo state. The Serbian government denounced the attack.
http://serbliberationblog.blogspot.c...b-does-it.html



The chutzpah of this filthy Jew swine Greenburg whose only loyalty is to Israel and his fellow jews. Look at what he wrote


Quote:
Melissa Bean places the interests of radical foreign nations above Freedom and Democracy
2/27/2008

Serbian Caucus Co-Chair continues support for anti-American Serbian fundamentalists and is getting paid for it

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

LAKE ZURICH 2/27/08— Eighth District Republican Nominee Steve Greenberg re-affirmed his support for the newly independent nation of Kosovo and called on Melissa Luburich Bean to follow his lead, by denouncing the Serbian violence against America and the people of Kosovo, withdrawing her sponsorship of controversial H. Res. 445 and by returning campaign donations from the anti-American Serbian Unity Conference.

The United States and eighteen other major world powers, including Great Britain, France, and Germany, have officially recognized Kosovo as a sovereign nation, but Melissa Luburich Bean stands against Kosovo’s freedom and independence. Last May Bean introduced H. Res. 445, which affirms Serbian control over Kosovo, by stating that “since 1999 Serbia has had no political, military, or economic presence in its[emphasis added] province of Kosovo,” and rejects future independence of Kosovo. Through her continued support of her resolution, Melissa Bean chooses to side with Serbian criminals who attacked America by breaking into and setting ablaze the U.S. Embassy in Belgrade last week while the Serbian government stood by and did nothing.

Bean’s support for anti-American Serbian fundamentalists runs even deeper; she has taken over $24,000 from members of the Serbian Unity Conference which “strongly denounces Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence as well as America’s subsequent recognition of it.” Bean even sent a letter to President George W. Bush urging him to not recognize Kosovo as an independent nation.

Steve Greenberg:

“Melissa Bean chose to side with oppression and anti-American fundamentalists, instead of freedom and independence. Melissa Bean places the interests of radical foreign nations above the interests of freedom and democracy. She must denounce the Serbian violence against Americans at our embassy. She must stand on the side of freedom and withdraw her sponsorship of controversial H. Res. 445 which does not support the American policy of recognition for Kosovo. Finally she should return all money sent to her by the Serbian Unity Conference.”

Jew Steve Greenberg
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 7th, 2008 #17
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Interview with Borislav Milosevic brother of murdered former Serb President Slobodan Milosevic


Quote:

Borislav Milosevic: "Serbians Will Never Accept Kosovo Independence"


Borislav Milosevic, Ambassador of the United Republic of Yugoslavia to Russia from 1998 - 2001, elder brother of former President of Yugoslavia Slobodan Milosevic, told our correspondent in an exclusive interview about the political situation in Serbia and the future of Kosovo, and about Russian-Serbian relations.

Borislav is 71-years old and still trim and smart. He speaks fluent Russian, English, and French. He bears a slight resemblance with his late brother, Slobodan, and shares the same anxieties about the future of their beloved native land.

What is your opinion about the announcement of Kosovo's independence and its recognition by several countries?

MILOSEVIC: It is very painful for every Serbian. There is a feeling of humiliation and injustice, a trampling of international rights, the helplessness of the United Nations. It means that if you have force and resources, you can defend your rights in international relations. If you don't have such power, you don't have any rights. I think that the U.S. and the European Union made a gross and criminal mistake with far-reaching, serious consequences for international relations.

At the present moment (February 17) do you foresee any possibilities for the settlement of Kosovo's status problem?

MILOSEVIC: Yes, there are some. We should continue negotiations and the search for compromise. But some countries will continue to block this course. There were no real negotiations between Belgrade and Pristina. Actually, Albanian separatists during negotiations in Vienna and Brussels tested the Serbian side - to see what kinds of concessions they could win. The Serbian side made concessions. The Kosovo Albanians didn't make any offerings or concessions because the U.S. and some European countries promised them independence. Thus, Kosovo's separatists simply waited for the end of this show, and their bosses handed them this independence.

What do you think about Kosovo's future?

MILOSEVIC: There are no responsible and serious political parties in Serbia today that stand for recognition of Kosovo's independence. Russia and China in the Security Council of the United Nations stand for the territorial integrity of Serbia. The positions of Russia and China are very important for the system of international law. The situation around Kosovo may be a double precedent for global affairs. First, in March 1999 NATO unleashed aggression against Yugoslavia, and western politicians said this war was an exception of the rule. But now U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice says that it was a precedent: "Why can't we attack Iran? We bombed Yugoslavia without a mandate of the Security Council of the United Nations already!" Second, this is a precedent for all current points of separatism all over the world.

How do you estimate the chances of Belgrade to confirm and defend the territorial integrity of Serbia?

MILOSEVIC: We will never recognize Kosovo's independence; such a declaration... is illegal. Russia and China think the same way and they are opposed to any idea of Kosovo becoming a member of the United Nations. Without a membership in the UN, Kosovo remains just a territory, not a country.

What is your opinion concerning the use of military force by Belgrade to decide this present problem? Is it possible?

MILOSEVIC: I don't think so. The Serbian authorities declared it would use only peaceful methods, not military force, in the conflict with the Albanian separatists. My opinion is that there is no need to reject legal methods for the defense of our own people. Kosovo's Albanians, however, never give such promises to Serbians. On the contrary, they threaten the Serbians by warning them that if Kosovo doesn't receive independence, they won't be able to control the fury of the people, and conflict would be inevitable.

Frankly speaking, there are no Armed Forces in Serbia. More than 250,000 Serbians were driven out from Kosovo by Albanian separatists. Presently, Serbians are living in Kosovo like in a ghetto. After the NATO occupation, more than 150 ancient Orthodox churches were destroyed by Albanians in Kosovo. There are no repair works. Serbians are living there in constant fear. Even Serbian children cannot go to school without adults. After NATO's occupation, hundreds of Serbians were killed in Kosovo. More than 3,000 Serbians are "missing" in Kosovo (that means "killed"). There are no investigations. Presently, Albanians are capturing Serbia's federal, social, and private property. The occupation's forces in Kosovo, the so-called peacekeeping forces, ignored Resolution 1244 of the Security Council of the UN. They misrepresent the current situation in Kosovo in its reports to the UN General Secretary. Today, Kosovo is a crucial point in the drug trade, which traffics heroin from Afghanistan and Pakistan to Europe.

Why is the U.S. seeking independence for distant Kosovo?

MILOSEVIC: First, it is a matter of principle. The U.S. wants to demonstrate all over the world its hegemony in global affairs. That means only the U.S. can decide who may receive independence, and to whom it is not allowed. Second, it is another step in NATO's expansion in the East. It's not enough to control the territory by air and sea blockade. Full control of the territory requires having troops on the ground. American politicians are dreaming about the creation of the so-called ‘security belt' from the Baltic Sea to the Balkans and Black Sea. Only Belarus prevents the fulfillment of this plan.

The target of NATO's enlargement to the East is not Serbia, but Russia, with its huge natural resources. This is obvious to many Russians. The U.S. have such cases in its geopolitical game in the Balkans. That means that Kosovo will join NATO.

There were some discussions in Russian mass media about Tomislav Nikolic's offer of Serbia ‘s accession to the ‘Union of Russia and Belarus' and the construction of a Russian military base in Serbia. What do you think of such an idea?

MILOSEVIC: This idea about Serbia joining the Union of Russia and Belarus is not new. President Slobodan Milosevic offered this plan in 1999. State Duma Chairman at the time, Gennady Seleznyov, visited Belgrade in April 1999 during NATO's air raids and discussed this plan. As to military bases, there are many fictions. Tomislav Nikolic said if the U.S. puts antiballistic missiles in Poland and the Czech Republic, Russia may deploy its own radar in Serbia.

Do you think that the Serbian population of Kosovska Mitrovica will join Belgrade? Is it possible that Serbian inhabitants in that area state their desire to divide Kosovo into two parts because they don't want to live with Albanians?

MILOSEVIC: I don't have a right to divide Kosovo. The whole region belongs to Serbia! The Serbian government cannot divide Kosovo, its own territory.

A big Serbian community lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Is it possible that the Republika Srpska will obtain independence? Is it possible to create a chain reaction in the Balkans?

Certainly, the Republika Srpska has a right to separate from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Why a part of Serbia may declare its independence, and a current part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republika Srpska, cannot have such right? Furthermore, if the people want, the Republika Srpska can join Serbia. The parade of separatism and divisions can continue in the Balkans.

If Serbia will not recognize a separation of Kosovo and stop diplomatic relations with countries which support Kosovo, what do you see for Serbia's future?

Do you think that Serbia should submit to Kosovo's recognition by Western countries?

MILOSEVIC: I think that the Serbian people will never submit to the separation of Kosovo from their native land. As to the future of Serbia, I think that the joining to the European Union and NATO is not Serbia's only option. I think we may cooperate with Europe and America and have the strategic partnership with Russia and have close ties with China, India, and other countries.

Will Serbia continue to lean toward Europe?

MILOSEVIC: Surely, it will. Serbia is in Europe, we are Europeans. But Serbia has to join the European Union as a whole country with its borders recognized by the international community. This joining should be without robbery and black mail from Kosovo and The Hague.

You and Tomislav Nikolic met with a then-candidate for the presidential post, Dmitry Medvedev. What does he think?

MILOSEVIC: Russians cannot be more Serbian than Serbians themselves. Medvedev repeats the principal position of Russia that Kosovo's independence is unacceptable for Moscow. Nikolic and I were very impressed by Medvedev.

Now Belgrade is an ally of Moscow. Is it a friendship without problems?

MILOSEVIC: Persons and peoples are friends, but countries don't have emotions. States and organizations have only interests. In the present time relations between Serbia and Russia are excellent. And I am sure that our productive and mutually profitable cooperation will strengthen and develop. We respect Russia and Vladimir Putin.

Did Slobodan Milosevic make any mistakes concerning Kosovo?

MILOSEVIC: There are no politicians without mistakes in the world. Slobodan all his life defended people from terrorists, and territorial integrity of Serbia from separatists. There was no genocide against the Albanians. That is false. Slobodan was looking for a political settlement. He met with Ibrahim Rugova and other moderate Albanian leaders. But the West didn't let him reach a compromise; the West supported the Albanians... NATO unleashed a war against Yugoslavia in 1999. It was not a humanitarian operation, but an aggressive military operation to conquer and expand in the East.

Do you believe the results of the official investigation of your brother's death? Was it murder or assassination in The Hague?

MILOSEVIC: I don't think that somebody put poison in his tea or smothered him with a pillow. But it was murder nevertheless because prison denied him permission to go to Moscow for medical treatment at a special hospital. A conclusion was made by an international doctors' council that he required urgent medical treatment in a special hospital. The government of Russia agreed to receive Slobodan in Moscow's Bakulev Center for Cardiovascular Surgery. So yes, what happened was the murder of an innocent and guiltless person. Slobodan represented himself in court very well, so they decided to escape from him.

By Yuri Plutenko
http://mnweekly.ru/politics/20080306/55314865.html
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 8th, 2008 #18
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Default

Serbs Defending Europe's Gates Once Again

Freedom Party of Austria (FPO) leader Heinz-Christian Strache on Sunday attended the service at the Church of the Ascension of Holy Mother of God in Vienna's 17th district and said afterwards that he would defend Serbian positions and fight for Serbia in Austria's parliamentary life.


In a one-and-half hour speech, Strache said that he absolutely supports the just struggle of the Serbian people and urges the respect of international law. Condemning the recognition of the unilateral declaration of independence by Pristina separatists, Strache warned that this could hit the entire Europe like a boomerang.


“Similar to 600 years ago, the Serbs are again defending Europe, which is threatened by a dangerous islamization,” Strache said, adding that he would initiate a general patriotic movement made up of all patriotic parties in Europe to oppose the wrong policy of left-wing politicians and the mondialistic abuse of the Christian culture and civilization.


Austrain patriot Heinz-Christian Strache


Turkoalbanian savages in Austria sent this brave man death threats.




http://istina.at/index.php/component...page/Itemid,1/

Heinz-Christian Strache on front page of the Serbian news paper Kurir, where he gave an in depth interview. The cover reads 'I love Serbs'. This is one of the few papers in Serbia were you can still find some truth and objectivity, all the others are 100% pro American/ZOG
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Old March 8th, 2008 #19
Troy Alexander
Nice shot Troy you got him
 
Troy Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,332
Blog Entries: 1
Troy Alexander
Default

Why are you so wound up. One day decadence will come to the Albanian nation and the Serbian people will be waiting with a knife. Best thing to do is be patient and prepare and stop getting yourself wound up. Stop worrying; your a great nation and they are a horde; I should think that one day you will massacre every last one of these 'people'.
 
Old March 8th, 2008 #20
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,899
Serbian
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiddangerous View Post
Why are you so wound up. One day decadence will come to the Albanian nation and the Serbian people will be waiting with a knife. Best thing to do is be patient and prepare and stop getting yourself wound up. Stop worrying; your a great nation and they are a horde; I should think that one day you will massacre every last one of these 'people'.
Hopefully that day comes in my lifetime.
__________________
Don Black's Stormfront ''Russians''
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=456327
Russia Insider
https://russia-insider.com/en
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.
Page generated in 0.25240 seconds.