Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 23rd, 2015 #1
Ian Smith son
Senior Member
 
Ian Smith son's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: France
Posts: 5,779
Ian Smith son
Default Earth may be much older than we thought, scientists say

Quote:
Researchers have found evidence in Western Australia that Earth may be 300 million years older than we thought.

That is the conclusion from a team of geochemists at UCLA and Stanford University who found evidence that life likely existed on Earth at least 4.1 billion years ago and may have begun shortly after the

planet formed 4.54 billion years ago.

“Twenty years ago, this would have been heretical; finding evidence of life 3.8 billion years ago was shocking,” said Mark Harrison, professor of geochemistry at UCLA and the co-author of the research

published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Life on Earth may have started almost instantaneously,” he said in a statement. “With the right ingredients, life seems to form very quickly.”
Earth may be much older than we thought, scientists say | Fox News

Confirmed: Oldest fragment of early Earth is 4.4 billion years old | Fox News

 
Old October 23rd, 2015 #2
Sam Emerson
Diversity = White Genocide
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Doom Fort II
Posts: 2,800
Sam Emerson
Default

Do any of our creationists (Hugh, Hiles) want to comment?
 
Old October 23rd, 2015 #3
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,701
varg
Default



Well it was easily explained during the jurassic period. It's going to be more difficult for billions of years ago.

Quick, I'm going to need a photo of micro-jesus riding bacteria. Someone get on that.
 
Old October 23rd, 2015 #4
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,439
Crowe
Default

Aw, common Varg you know the earth is only 6000 years old! . It wasn't but maybe 4000 years ago when jeboo was riding a T-Rex.

https://answersingenesis.org/evidenc...a-young-earth/

Quote:
Despite this wealth of evidence, it is important to understand that, from the perspective of observational science, no one can prove absolutely how young (or old) the universe is. Only one dating method is absolutely reliable—a witness who doesn’t lie, who has all evidence, and who can reveal to us when the universe began!

And we do have such a witness—the God of the Bible! He has given us a specific history, beginning with the six days of Creation and followed by detailed genealogies that allow us to determine when the universe began. Based on this history, the beginning was only about six thousand years ago (about four thousand years from Creation to Christ).
So there we have it. How can anyone argue with god? They wouldn't want to be a heretic or a blasphemer would they?
 
Old October 23rd, 2015 #5
notmenomore
Senior Member
 
notmenomore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,174
notmenomore
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe View Post
Aw, common Varg you know the earth is only 6000 years old! . It wasn't but maybe 4000 years ago when jeboo was riding a T-Rex.

https://answersingenesis.org/evidenc...a-young-earth/



So there we have it. How can anyone argue with god? They wouldn't want to be a heretic or a blasphemer would they?

Quote:
Only one dating method is absolutely reliable—a witness who doesn’t lie, who has all evidence, and who can reveal to us when the universe began!
Actually, there's another useful witness - the cosmic microwave background radiation. It's totally measurable, constant, and can be extrapolated backward to determine the likely time of a singularity at the origin of what has now become the observable universe.

Jeboo was about something else altogether. See W.G.Simpson, Which Way Western Man, for interesting discussion about Jeboo. Spoiler alert: Simpson leaves the physicist stuff to the physicists.
__________________
No way out but through the jews.
 
Old October 24th, 2015 #6
Crowe
Senior Member
 
Crowe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 6,439
Crowe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by notmenomore View Post
Actually, there's another useful witness - the cosmic microwave background radiation. It's totally measurable, constant, and can be extrapolated backward to determine the likely time of a singularity at the origin of what has now become the observable universe.
More importantly are christ tards who completely discount the findings of our greatest minds just because buy-bull explains it differently in a simplistic manner for retards. Retards look for simple explanations for complex things they don't understand. Whereas normal people should possess the ability to be content with not knowing without it affecting their lives. People used to look up in the sky and hear thunder or see lightning, and attributed that to being some god that was pissed off. Many christ tards probably still think god is angry when they hear thunder. Meteorology is blasphemy.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 PM.
Page generated in 0.07674 seconds.