Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old May 25th, 2014 #21
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

funny the DM has rep as right-wing paper but its basic assumptions are 100% feminist, as in this article in which photos and shallow arguments are used to build a bogus case that women are victims of discrimination.

white men are never allowed their achievements, never credited for them as a sex/race. they're always at someone else's expense. this article even admits that fewer qualified white males go on to advanced education than other groups, and that right there is where the real racial discrimination lies. white men realize that educationism today, with its slowness, passivity, lack of competitition, propaganda, group projects, etc is not the place for them, and a place that makes it clear it doesn't want them, so they naturally turn to the world of work and achievement where standards and real and objective, and they can actually make money and win fame


Female 'A+' students make only as much as males who earn 'C' grades

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...tml#newcomment

look at this photo: "ha ha, i get everything easy and free because i'm a privileged white male" - that's what this stock photo was selected to convey by the DM editor
 
Old May 25th, 2014 #22
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

bloodsweatcheersUwarriorgrrl
Friday 7:40pm
PFollow bloodsweatcheers
jShare to Facebook
iShare to Twitter
rGo to permalink
I mean, they didn't say they didn't like cheering, they said they didn't like the low wages and sexual harassment. So I'm not sure what the point of your comment is.

http://jezebel.com/being-an-nfl-chee...1580669638/all

[argument over NFL cheerleaders and their 'working' conditions. the point here is that women feel they should be able to set terms for everything. and boy, if you want to talk 'privilege' in this society, that is one that is backed by every form of popular culture. it really is true: without grasping it, these women want everything exactly the way they want it, and it's someone else's responsibility -- legally -- to provide it. in the employment world, as elsewhere, wimmin have no problem forcing employers to do what they want. women will dictate terms on everything - if they can. that's their natural impulse, certainly. you really can't separate freeom from responsibility. since no one believes women are capable of taking responsibility, it must all be laid at the feet of the men who marry or employ them. his freedom, any idea of freedom, is profoundly alien to the basic female mindset. and this biological tendency is strengthened by everything in the media, everything coming from every official vector. the woman is always the victim, and the man is always reponsible for what she does and says and how she feels, which is of course the all-standard]
 
Old May 26th, 2014 #23
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

[this is the dead center of the female mentality]

OMGGGGGG. I really hope SOMEONE at John Frieda sees this page and brings Ocean Waves back WITH THE EXACT SAME FORMULA. Just seeing the pic of it triggered intense *must grab* feelings! I used to use this everyday and it actually made my hair healthier. One time, I actually sprayed my hair down with it at the beach and OMG....best hair ever. It looked like the grl's did on the bottle with the long hair.
*Thinking about how great everything about this was...*
The bottle, the colour, the scent, the price, the perfectly fine mist of the nozzle...ahh I could go on and on...

http://jezebel.com/why-wont-they-bri...ray-1563505694
 
Old August 19th, 2014 #24
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

http://www.women24.com/Wellness/Wome...inist-20140818

i left a comment on this

Alex Linder - Just postedReport commentComments Policy
If you weren't afraid, maybe you would describe those men as niggers, which I'm guessing 100% of them were.
 
Old September 8th, 2014 #25
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

5 Feminist Myths That Will Not Die
Christina Hoff Sommers Sept. 2, 2014

If we're genuinely committed to improving the circumstances of women, we need to get the facts straight

Much of what we hear about the plight of American women is false. Some faux facts have been repeated so often they are almost beyond the reach of critical analysis. Though they are baseless, these canards have become the foundation of Congressional debates, the inspiration for new legislation and the focus of college programs. Here are five of the most popular myths that should be rejected by all who are genuinely committed to improving the circumstances of women:

Quote:
MYTH 1: Women are half the world’s population, working two-thirds of the world’s working hours, receiving 10% of the world’s income, owning less than 1% of the world’s property.
FACTS: This injustice confection is routinely quoted by advocacy groups, the World Bank, Oxfam and the United Nations. It is sheer fabrication. More than 15 years ago, Sussex University experts on gender and development Sally Baden and Anne Marie Goetz, repudiated the claim: “The figure was made up by someone working at the UN because it seemed to her to represent the scale of gender-based inequality at the time.” But there is no evidence that it was ever accurate, and it certainly is not today.

Precise figures do not exist, but no serious economist believes women earn only 10% of the world’s income or own only 1% of property. As one critic noted in an excellent debunking in The Atlantic, “U.S. women alone earn 5.4 percent of world income today.” Moreover, in African countries, where women have made far less progress than their Western and Asian counterparts, Yale economist Cheryl Doss found female land ownership ranged from 11% in Senegal to 54% in Rwanda and Burundi. Doss warns that “using unsubstantiated statistics for advocacy is counterproductive.” Bad data not only undermine credibility, they obstruct progress by making it impossible to measure change.

Quote:
MYTH 2: Between 100,000 and 300,000 girls are pressed into sexual slavery each year in the United States.
FACTS: This sensational claim is a favorite of politicians, celebrities and journalists. Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore turned it into a cause célèbre. Both conservatives and liberal reformers deploy it. Former President Jimmy Carter recently said that the sexual enslavement of girls in the U.S. today is worse than American slavery in the 19th century.

The source for the figure is a 2001 report on child sexual exploitation by University of Pennsylvania sociologists Richard Estes and Neil Alan Weiner. But their 100,000–300,000 estimate referred to children at risk for exploitation—not actual victims. When three reporters from the Village Voice questioned Estes on the number of children who are abducted and pressed into sexual slavery each year, he replied, “We’re talking about a few hundred people.” And this number is likely to include a lot of boys: According to a 2008 census of underage prostitutes in New York City, nearly half turned out to be male. A few hundred children is still a few hundred too many, but they will not be helped by thousand-fold inflation of their numbers.

Quote:
MYTH 3: In the United States, 22%–35% of women who visit hospital emergency rooms do so because of domestic violence.
FACTS: This claim has appeared in countless fact sheets, books and articles—for example, in the leading textbook on family violence, Domestic Violence Law, and in the Penguin Atlas of Women in the World. The Penguin Atlas uses the emergency room figure to justify placing the U.S. on par with Uganda and Haiti for intimate violence.

What is the provenance? The Atlas provides no primary source, but the editor of Domestic Violence Law cites a 1997 Justice Department study, as well as a 2009 post on the Centers for Disease Control website. But the Justice Department and the CDC are not referring to the 40 million women who annually visit emergency rooms, but to women, numbering about 550,000 annually, who come to emergency rooms “for violence-related injuries.” Of these, approximately 37% were attacked by intimates. So, it’s not the case that 22%-35% of women who visit emergency rooms are there for domestic violence. The correct figure is less than half of 1%.

Quote:
MYTH 4: One in five in college women will be sexually assaulted.
FACTS: This incendiary figure is everywhere in the media today. Journalists, senators and even President Obama cite it routinely. Can it be true that the American college campus is one of the most dangerous places on earth for women?

The one-in-five figure is based on the Campus Sexual Assault Study, commissioned by the National Institute of Justice and conducted from 2005 to 2007. Two prominent criminologists, Northeastern University’s James Alan Fox and Mount Holyoke College’s Richard Moran, have noted its weaknesses:

“The estimated 19% sexual assault rate among college women is based on a survey at two large four-year universities, which might not accurately reflect our nation’s colleges overall. In addition, the survey had a large non-response rate, with the clear possibility that those who had been victimized were more apt to have completed the questionnaire, resulting in an inflated prevalence figure.”

Fox and Moran also point out that the study used an overly broad definition of sexual assault. Respondents were counted as sexual assault victims if they had been subject to “attempted forced kissing” or engaged in intimate encounters while intoxicated.

Defenders of the one-in-five figure will reply that the finding has been replicated by other studies. But these studies suffer from some or all of the same flaws. Campus sexual assault is a serious problem and will not be solved by statistical hijinks.

Quote:
MYTH 5: Women earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns—for doing the same work.
FACTS: No matter how many times this wage gap claim is decisively refuted by economists, it always comes back. The bottom line: the 23-cent gender pay gap is simply the difference between the average earnings of all men and women working full-time. It does not account for differences in occupations, positions, education, job tenure or hours worked per week. When such relevant factors are considered, the wage gap narrows to the point of vanishing.

Wage gap activists say women with identical backgrounds and jobs as men still earn less. But they always fail to take into account critical variables. Activist groups like the National Organization for Women have a fallback position: that women’s education and career choices are not truly free—they are driven by powerful sexist stereotypes. In this view, women’s tendency to retreat from the workplace to raise children or to enter fields like early childhood education and psychology, rather than better paying professions like petroleum engineering, is evidence of continued social coercion. Here is the problem: American women are among the best informed and most self-determining human beings in the world. To say that they are manipulated into their life choices by forces beyond their control is divorced from reality and demeaning, to boot.

Why do these reckless claims have so much appeal and staying power? For one thing, there is a lot of statistical illiteracy among journalists, feminist academics and political leaders. There is also an admirable human tendency to be protective of women—stories of female exploitation are readily believed, and vocal skeptics risk appearing indifferent to women’s suffering. Finally, armies of advocates depend on “killer stats” to galvanize their cause. But killer stats obliterate distinctions between more and less serious problems and send scarce resources in the wrong directions. They also promote bigotry. The idea that American men are annually enslaving more than 100,000 girls, sending millions of women to emergency rooms, sustaining a rape culture and cheating women out of their rightful salary creates rancor in true believers and disdain in those who would otherwise be sympathetic allies.

My advice to women’s advocates: Take back the truth.

Christina Hoff Sommers, a former philosophy professor, is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. She is the author of several books, including Who Stole Feminism and The War Against Boys, and is the host of a weekly video blog, The Factual Feminist. Follow her @CHSommers.

http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-m...-will-not-die/
 
Old November 21st, 2014 #27
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

final stop down feminist road, in Sweden it comes full circle

 
Old November 27th, 2014 #28
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

anita sarkeesian, conwoman

http://guardianlv.com/2014/11/anita-...or-con-artist/
 
Old April 17th, 2015 #29
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,374
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

 
Old March 30th, 2016 #30
Josie_in_SF
Junior Member
 
Josie_in_SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 143
Blog Entries: 6
Josie_in_SF
Default

"Feminism" is masculinity for women. If a woman believed in full on "female supremacy," at least that would be something of an honest position. "Feminism" is an entirely dishonest, incongruent position.
 
Old February 1st, 2017 #31
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,910
Robbie Key
Default

Has anyone read The Fraud of Feminism (1913) by Ernest Belfort Bax? Apparently a classic.

PDF: https://ia600208.us.archive.org/27/i...00baxerich.pdf

Or it can be read here, THE FRAUD OF FEMINISM: https://ernestbelfortbax.com/

Quote:
Introduction

IN the following pages it is not intended to furnish a treatise on the evolution of woman generally or of her place in society, but simply to offer a criticism on the theory and practice of what is known as Modern Feminism.

By Modern Feminism I understand a certain attitude of mind towards the female sex. This attitude of mind is often self-contradictory and illogical. While on the one hand it will claim, on the ground of the intellectual and moral equality of women with men, the concession of female suffrage, and commonly, in addition thereto, the admission of women to all professions, offices and functions of public life; on the other it will strenuously champion the preservation and intensification of the privileges and immunities before the law, criminal and civil, in favour of women, which have grown up in the course of the nineteenth century.

The above attitude, with all its inconsistencies, has at its back a strong sex-conscious party, or sex union, as we may term it, among women, and a floating mass of inconsequent, slushy sentiment among men. There is more than one popular prejudice which obscures the meaning and significance of Modern Feminism with many people. There is a common theory, for instance, based upon what really obtained to some extent before the prevalence of Modern Feminism, that in any case of antagonism between the two sexes, women always take the man’s side against the woman. Now this theory, if it ever represented the true state of the case, has long ceased to do so.

The powerful female sex union spoken of, in the present day, exercises such a strong pressure in the formation of public opinion among women, that it is rapidly becoming next to impossible, even in the most flagrant cases, where man is the victim, to get any woman to acknowledge that another woman has committed a wrong. On the other hand it may be noted, that the entire absence of any consciousness of sex antagonism in the attitude of men towards women, combined with an intensification of the old-world chivalry prescribed by tradition towards the so-called weaker sex, exercises, if anything, an increasing sway over male public opinion. Hence the terrific force Feminism has obtained in the world of the early twentieth century.

It is again often supposed, and this is also a mistake, that in individual cases of dispute between the sexes, the verdict, let us say of a jury of men, in favour of the female prisoner or the female litigant is solely or even mainly determined by the fact of the latter’s good looks. This may indeed play a part; but it is easy to show from records of cases that it is a subordinate one – that, whatever her looks or her age may be, the verdict is given her not so much because she is a pretty woman as because she is a woman. Here again the question of attractiveness may have played a more potent part in determining male verdicts in the days before Feminist sentiment and Feminist views had reached their present dominance. But now the question of sex alone, of being a woman, is sufficient to determine judgment in her favour.

There is a trick with which votaries of Feminism seek to prejudice the public mind against its critics, and that is the “fake” that any man who ventures to criticise the pretensions of Feminism, is actuated by motives of personal rancour against the female sex, owing to real or imaginary wrongs suffered by him at the hands of some member or members of the sex. I suppose it may be possible that there are persons, not precisely microcephalous idiots, who could be made to believe such stuff as this in disparagement of him who ventures an independent judgment on these questions; otherwise the conduct of Feminists in adopting this line of argument would be incomprehensible. But we would fain believe that the number of these feebleminded persons, who believe there is any connection between a man having independent judgement enough to refuse to bend the knee to Modern Feminist dogma, and his having quarrelled with any or all of his female friends or relations, cannot be very numerous. As a matter of fact there is not one single prominent exponent of views hostile to the pretensions of what is called the “Woman’s Movement” of the present day, respecting whom there is a tittle of evidence of his not having lived all his life on the best of terms with his womankind. There is only one case known of indirectly by the present writer, and that not of a prominent writer or speaker on the subject, that would afford any plausible excuse whatever for alleging anti-Feminist views to have been influenced by personal motives of this kind. I am aware, of course, that Feminists, with their usual mendacity, have made lying statements to this effect respecting well-nigh every prominent writer on the anti-Feminist side, in the hope of influencing the aforesaid feeble-minded members of the public against their opponents. But a very little investigation suffices to show in every case the impudent baselessness of their allegations. The contemptible silliness of this method of controversy should render it unworthy of serious remark, and my only excuse for alluding to it is the significant sidelight it casts upon the intellectual calibre of those who resort to it, and of the confidence or want of confidence they have in the inherent justice of their cause and the logical strength of their case.

Last edited by Robbie Key; February 1st, 2017 at 08:53 AM.
 
Old February 1st, 2017 #32
Todd Fletch
Junior Member
 
Todd Fletch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 187
Todd Fletch
Default

Feminism Is Just A Polite Word For A Hate Movement Against Men

Feminism is a hate movement. The elites are said to have funded this. Get to tax two households instead of one. Here we have white women, the most spoiled and pampered people on the planet, complaining that they're oppressed. What a joke!

The word feminism has become such a pejorative one in the comments area that in left leaning publications of all places--more often than not--it's basically used as an four lettered word.

Hell, He For She is an organization that all but admits that feminism is basically having to rebrand itself. Maybe old things like the SCUM manifesto made their feigned oppression a bit less sympathetic to the average joe.

Feminism is a shit test that our fathers and grandfathers totally failed. It seems to have a bit too much over representation of JEWISH WOMEN as its leaders too!

As long as this fourth wave feminism keeps having temper trantrums about air cconditioners in offices ALLEGEDLY being SEXIST, being stompy foot anger marches about Hillbillery losing to Trump, regret rape, false wage gap, a grossly overstated 1 in 5 women are RAAaaaped exaggeration, etc. Just countless examples of intellectual dishonesty.

Here's a classic article about why the "misandry bubble burst" years ago and why the "feminist bull market" is over: http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2012/04/...ecade-ago.html
 
Old January 3rd, 2019 #33
ulsterpatriot
Junior Member
 
ulsterpatriot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 152
ulsterpatriot
Default

For all we have supposedly gained in equality, we have lost even more in our distinctiveness. And I would argue that no one has lost more than women.

Seventy years ago, women who chose to work could do so and many did. But many more women followed their natural impulse toward motherhood, choosing not just to have children, but be members of a society that still valued having mothers in the lives of their children enough to support an economy where the man worked, and the mother was there to raise the next generation, provide love and guidance, and to nurture their hopes and dreams.

This was destroyed. The big lie women are told is that they have it better these days, but the ugly reality, ladies, is you have been turned into lesser versions of men. Something beautiful and precious was surrendered, without choice in many cases to what was deemed a new economic reality, but when we reconsider what happened, it’s easy to see the scam.

The Left promised that you would have the liberation of cheap sex and the joy of working for faceless bureaucracies. The skills which once managed households and ensured our future have now been employed into Excel spreadsheets and politically correct HR regulations guides. Your bodies, which once served as temples for admiration and respect have been desecrated into common brothels in the public eye, where you are forced to trade on your looks as well as you can as long as you can before being disposed and forgotten.

The non Nationalist Right was no ally to women either, as in their desire to avoid the cultural battles which might launch perpetual offense, the people elected by the Republicans in destroying the industry of the West and putting the market above the family, gleefully endorsed the two working parent vision of America where the state would now raise your children in a rich ferment of self-hatred and insecurity.

Women were promised freedom and liberation at the cost of any new life they would make. Tomorrow was traded for today, a choice Western women made in many different areas, but now the moment has come due and what do we see? We see marriage, as an institution, made into a public mockery. We see sex even, once something as simple to understand as basic anatomy, somehow absurdly transformed into a question, all because we made the same bad bargain of trying to make everyone the same.

Women, and especially those who happen to be White, are now seeing the backslide that comes after making their deal with the devil. No longer served by the Second Wave Feminism that painted them as the social hero, they must give way to the minority, the transgender, the immigrant, and the outsider as they get their turn to be special before blending into the equality of nothingness. You are now only valued for your votes and your submission, your wombs to produce the soldiers of the next generations of equality as the state relentlessly bombards through propaganda and peer pressure alike. Here is the rotten fruit of Feminism,

I wish it was a joke, but motherhood, the inescapably vital experience that makes women who they are is now presented. It’s a choice to be restrained for when the fun is done. It isn’t understood anymore as how our future is made – not because that ever stopped being true – but because we are supposed to forget. There was a time when women were special, when men fought to defend you, and when they enjoyed dominion over our homes and served as stewards for the next generation. There was a time when women had a future in the achievements of each son and daughter they produced. But that time is passing.

The hope we have for the future is that this is a choice, and although the cost would undoubtedly be high, only our lack of courage and foresight compels us to walk astray from this pathway to hell so paved with good intentions.



I could imagine a future where women were mothers and housewives again, not because we chain them to a stove or oven, but because if given the choice without overwhelming media and peer pressure, most women would rather raise kids than chase dollars. A healthy society has always been constructed this way, and if we didn’t care so much about false idols like equality or money, the twin temptations that we pretend force us to surrender choice, we can reclaim what we once enjoyed.

I know it can work because I’ve seen it work. My family lives modestly, but my wife supports me, and we exist as a team against the world. I have talked to other order15 members and nationalists in general who are reclaiming femininity, who are taking back their homes, and we must be allies to these women and men who are connecting to produce our future, with their bodies and with their hearts, regardless of what main stream society does.

But that requires us to forget the lies we’ve been taught. We can start again with basics: A boy can be a boy and a girl should be a girl. And a family has two parents. That isn’t oppression; that’s the future our children require. The traditional family unit is priceless, and when our women and men serve that higher purpose, our movement and ideals will only prosper.

http://www.order15.com/2018/12/14/what-women-lost/
 
Reply

Tags
#1, feminism

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Page generated in 0.12366 seconds.