Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old January 26th, 2011 #81
procopius
Senior Member
 
procopius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,611
procopius
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ulysses Crane View Post
No. There is no evil in Norse mythology. There is only law and chaos. The Gods represent law, the giants and trolls and other creatures represent chaos. Not all giants are evil. It's a lot more complicated than "good vs evil". Our Pagan ancestors did not think of such, because either means absolute.



...and then the worlds would be reborn, along with Asgard and Valhalla.



Because the Norse viewed everything in cycles. All Aryans did. Hence the Sunwheel/swastika. The world would be sent into darkness and despair and then destroyed and a new world would be reborn, lead by Baldur and the sons of Thor and Odin. The Norse did not believe in an "unknown supreme god". That's bullshit.

Shut the fuck up about shit you don't know, asshole.
I may be an asshole but atleast I'm not a stupid shit eating fuck like you.
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #82
ray bateson
baппed
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A:\
Posts: 3,367
ray bateson
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by procopius View Post
I may be an asshole but atleast I'm not a stupid shit eating fuck like you.
PawwwWRAAAAAAYYEAHZ GAAAHhwould!!!
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #83
Vijay Coomar
TNT NT-YT
 
Vijay Coomar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: VNN Chatroom
Posts: 2,898
Vijay Coomar
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ray bateson View Post
PawwwWRAAAAAAYYEAHZ GAAAHhwould!!!
What kind of stoopid shitskin pidgin is this?
__________________
Make America WHITE Again.

Join a gym. Get in shape. If women still hate you, well then that can't be changed, but as much as they hate you, they will still want to lay you. -Keifer
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #84
John Q. Ferguson
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 312
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John in Woodbridge View Post
I recently joined the Council of Conservatives Citizens. One of their planks is that America is a Christian nation. But their type of Christianity is a white nationalist one, if you can believe that.
Of course I can.

If white Christians truly believed in an egalitarianism then where did black churches come from?

You think niggers were too lazy to go to white church? (Well maybe. Dumb question.)

Let me re-state that. You really think white Christians, historically, have wanted to share a pew with a nigger?

What type of Christianity was being practiced in Richmond in 1850?

You think German Christians felt really badly about the treatment of das juden? What type of Christianity was being practiced in Berlin in 1940?

What type of Christianity is being practiced across America at the multitude of white churches that reject the hippie-dippie, feel-good, hug a fag, we're all the same, bullshit?

Let me put it this way. Attacking Christianity is like attacking the media.

Let's get rid of the media. It's perverted, it's anti-white, it's full of fags, niggers, muds and jews. So let's tear down the TV stations and smash the flat screens. Set off dynamite in the San Andreas Fault and watch Hollyweird and Kalifornia slide into the ocean. (Actually not a bad idea.)

Or.

Let's recognize that the media is inherently malleable. And it is also an incredibly useful tool for shaping public opinion. So instead of trying to demolish it, why not control it. Let's find media people who believe in white nationalism. Even better, let's grow our own. Let's sponsor our own TV station or radio station or forums. Let's flood the internet with a positive, pro-white message.

Same-same with the public educational system, universities . . . and Christianity.

Look, no disrespect intended to Christian white nationalists, but social institutions are like whores. They're easy. They swing from liberal to conservative, from pro-this to pro-that easily. Christianity has been perverted just like the media, public schools, the military and other institutions. But that doesn't make it the enemy of white nationalism.

Final point:

God created man in his own image.

Go ask a conservative white Christian, especially a Southern one, if he really thinks God looks like Jimmy Walker.

 
Old January 26th, 2011 #85
M. Issig
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 459
M. Issig
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OTPTT View Post
Many thinking themselves wise and intelligent in their own eyes can't seem to get it through their thick skulls that the modern day Jew is not the same people as the Israelites of the Bible. ....
Yes. And, as long as the rhetoric consists of the words Jew and Jewish, the essence of the argument and/or assertions are invalid.


 
Old January 26th, 2011 #86
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,050
Fred Streed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad Charles View Post

No, I haven't read Rosenberg's book but I've read summaries. He likes the Manichaeism gnostic 'heresy' which obviously isn't like CI, I agree, especially in that it rejects the entire Old Testament - and also more importantly doesn't claim that White people descended from "real" Jews. That's a pretty disgusting part of CI to me personally.
The inclusion of the jew bible, the Old Testament, was probably a political move on the part of the early Jesus cult, an attempt to gain credibility and give the impression that they had a history behind them. They were actually an upstart cult that sprang up among the slaves and bottom strata of Roman society. Someone here, I think it was John Q. Ferguson in another thread, gave several New Testament quotes that appeared to support slavery. Of course they do. Slavery was a way of life for a sizable number of early xtians. A message that they should accept their lot because they would gain their reward in an afterlife was music to their ears.

The message of the Jesus cult truly was a huge break from traditional Judaism. In fact it isn't even close, there is a difference of kind between the meek acceptance of the tribulations of this world and their focus on an afterlife, as espoused by the New Testament, and the bloodthirsty rapaciousness of the jew's Old Testament, with it's insane tribal god.

Of course maybe ol' Yahway completely changed his attitude after he finally got laid, a virgin at that, and after a shot of some of that jew poon-tang he mellowed right out.



Quote:
I admire Rosenberg for attempting to replace the more odious forms of Christianity that were holding back some of the National Socialist program. It would have unified the churches. I may have tended to accept this type of Christianity for pragmatic reasons, to unite the White race but...I don't know. It still seems Jewish and for principle reasons would be difficult to implement wholeheartedly.
I used to tend toward the attitude that WN should avoid antagonizing nominal xtians. Years ago when I first arrived in WV and went to work for Dr. Pierce we had an older, and vastly more experienced gentleman on staff who was kind of my mentor for awhile. He always said there could be NO COMPROMISE with our ideology and that an attempt at accommodation with xtianity fundamentally undermined our message of biological racism and would fatally weaken it. I kind of based my ideas of xtians on educated Americans of an older generation who considered themselves xtians but never questioned science, they believed in evolution and had an open mind about things scientific, most of them if pressed would have admitted they thought of the bible as the mythology of an earlier time.

The gentleman in question, BTW, was a certain Will Williams who hailed from the state of NC. I don't think he would mind me mentioning his name in this context.

He was right, as I came to fully understand later.

Quote:
Hope to get some expert opinion on this because it's an interesting topic.
I ain't an expert but I agree it is an interesting topic.

Last edited by Fred Streed; January 26th, 2011 at 09:32 PM. Reason: stupid grammar errors
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #87
Moose
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 909
Moose
Default

Christianity is an inaccurate, or maybe meaningless term, from an analytical perspective.

There is Paulism, and then there is Augustinianism.

Paulism, or early Christianity, was essentially non-rabbi approved judaism centered on a spiritual guru, spread amongst the gentiles, with Paul acting as a sort of Muhammad character. In fact the great divide didn't come til much later, a result of unresolvable differences between gentile judaism and rabbinical judaism.

Christianity however became "Aryanized" or "Romanized." St. Augustine, "the doctor of the Church" as all the churches revere him, was a big time student of Greek philosophy, and infused it into the cult. From the time of Augustine until Luther, this was the focus of Christianity. Morality. Augustine himself said that the bible should only be taken as metaphorical, and also something to the effect that Christianity was not a religion for serious thinking men. Luther though, was an Augustinian. His beef with the Church was essentially moral.

The bad part is that he shifted the focus of the Church being a communion (communion meaning people coming together) on moral teachings and a family ritual, into a bible reading religion.

So today what we see in not only evangelism, "the baptists," but Catholicism as well, is a 180 degree return to Paulism. Most of these Christians today really are accurately, judeo.
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #88
MikeTodd
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
 
MikeTodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
MikeTodd
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OTPTT View Post
Many thinking themselves wise and intelligent in their own eyes can't seem to get it through their thick skulls that the modern day Jew is not the same people as the Israelites of the Bible. ....
They weren't White either so what's it matter?
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together.
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #89
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,050
Fred Streed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Q. Ferguson View Post
If white Christians truly believed in an egalitarianism then where did black churches come from?
It came from the innate and healthy racism born into Whites. It damned sure didn't come from anything contained in xtianity itself. They were segregated despite xtianity, not because of it.


Quote:
...You really think white Christians, historically, have wanted to share a pew with a nigger?
No, for the reasons stated above.

Quote:
You think German Christians felt really badly about the treatment of das juden? What type of Christianity was being practiced in Berlin in 1940?
You realize, of course, that there was no jew holocaust? But if the National Socialists had attempted a "final solution" it would have probably been impossible due to christ-insanity.


Quote:
Let me put it this way. Attacking Christianity is like attacking the media.
No. It is not. It is more like attacking the kike control of the media. We don't want to eliminate the news and entertainment media, we just want to free it from jew control.

Same with spiritual matters. We want to break it free from the control of an alien and unhealthy creed that denies basic reality in favor of obvious but dangerous non-sense.

Quote:
Let's get rid of the media. It's perverted, it's anti-white, it's full of fags, niggers, muds and jews. So let's tear down the TV stations and smash the flat screens. Set off dynamite in the San Andreas Fault and watch Hollyweird and Kalifornia slide into the ocean. (Actually not a bad idea.)

Or.

Let's recognize that the media is inherently malleable. And it is also an incredibly useful tool for shaping public opinion. So instead of trying to demolish it, why not control it. Let's find media people who believe in white nationalism. Even better, let's grow our own. Let's sponsor our own TV station or radio station or forums. Let's flood the internet with a positive, pro-white message.
see above

Quote:
Same-same with the public educational system, universities . . . and Christianity.
Saying we should control xtianity is an awful lot like saying "Let's regain control of the mass media by controlling the yids that run it. Won't work! What will work is to get rid of it and replace it with a spirituality of our own.



Quote:
Final point:

God created man in his own image.
Wrong. The jews of the old testament created a god in their image. The underclass of the Roman Empire modified him to better fit their image.
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #90
Thad Charles
Master Race
 
Thad Charles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: neo-Weimar JewSA
Posts: 1,568
Thad Charles
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The way you defeat something like christ-insanity, in my opinion, is to develop superior institutions, defined as having higher standards and being based in reality rather than fantasy. Do that, and remove the legal privileges the church receives, I think it would disappear over time
Yes, which I believe was Hitler's view as well. Instead of making martyrs out of people (the Christians really do have a taste for that since time immemorial) by attacking the churches it really would have been best to just let them erode naturally. Seeing how great Nazi Germany really was I think that was just the place for it to happen. It had the culture and the scientific advancements to accomplish such a feat.
__________________
"What are they? A religion, a race, a criminal conspiracy?" - Craig 'Chain' Cobb on the jews
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #91
Thad Charles
Master Race
 
Thad Charles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: neo-Weimar JewSA
Posts: 1,568
Thad Charles
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Streed View Post
I used to tend toward the attitude that WN should avoid antagonizing nominal xtians. Years ago when I first arrived in WV and went to work for Dr. Pierce we had an older, and vastly more experienced gentleman on staff who was kind of my mentor for awhile. He always said there could be NO COMPROMISE with our ideology and that an attempt at accommodation with xtianity fundamentally undermined our message of biological racism and would fatally weaken it.
I have to agree with you here on the "antagonizing" because really - how many Christians really believe anyway? I know the idea of an afterlife is very attractive. But in a country like the U.S. where a vast majority claims to be Christian, are they really acting like it? Practicing what they preach? Yes, at the moment they may be practicing the bad parts that we hate. The Jews are the Chosen People. Support Isra-hell. Equality for negroids and mestizos, etc. However, when it comes to things like this filth that Hollywood produces, who is gobbling that up? The "vastly Christian" public.

So it's my view that Christians really don't have any problem with discarding minor points of the Christian doctrine. Promiscuous sex? Homosexuality? I want to keep my R-rated movies! Christianity then takes a backseat.

Quote:
I kind of based my ideas of xtians on educated Americans of an older generation who considered themselves xtians but never questioned science, they believed in evolution and had an open mind about things scientific, most of them if pressed would have admitted they thought of the bible as the mythology of an earlier time.
Absolutely, and that's why I think these people don't have any issue at all with discarding some of these doctrines willy-nilly. You just have to make them feel good. We have to reach them by making hate FEEL good. We have to make them FEEL the truth. The truth that the Jew has so eroded our society like Christ (ha!) knows how many other societies in the past. The truth that if we continue down this path, we're going to face some really grim realities and if not them, their children and grandchildren.

Yes the filth that Hollywood largely churns out daily appeals to us humans' baser urges - sexual. But I'd argue that hating the enemy and fighting for your own appeals to base urges as well.

It's like I said about the backseat, we just have to put Christianity there when we deal with these people. Besides a very scant minority of hardcore Christians (think Opus Dei and maybe some Mormon sects and maybe some Evangelical sects), it's not going to be difficult at all to put Christianity in a corner while we get down to business. And I think we all know Christians are the kings of rationalization so perhaps despite thinking their "hate" is wrong, they'll still think they're going to heaven. To them, that's everything and to me as long as it doesn't get in the way of our goals, so be it.
__________________
"What are they? A religion, a race, a criminal conspiracy?" - Craig 'Chain' Cobb on the jews
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #92
Thad Charles
Master Race
 
Thad Charles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: neo-Weimar JewSA
Posts: 1,568
Thad Charles
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Q. Ferguson View Post

Let's recognize that the media is inherently malleable. And it is also an incredibly useful tool for shaping public opinion. So instead of trying to demolish it, why not control it. Let's find media people who believe in white nationalism. Even better, let's grow our own. Let's sponsor our own TV station or radio station or forums. Let's flood the internet with a positive, pro-white message.
Wasn't it Lenin who said the best way to control the opposition is to lead it? Let's take a page out of their book.

It would be infinitely hard to gain influence in the popular media. Hell, a guy named Rick Sanchez couldn't even keep his job after uttering a SINGLE thing about Jew control.

Now when it comes to churches, that's an interesting idea. But again, how long would it take for a covert WN priest to be defrocked after making comments about Jews? Those refugees generally get banished to Traditional Catholic churches (which I have a soft spot for admittedly) which have next to no influence.

Slightly off-topic but if we could get high-ranking positions in orgs like the ADL, SPLC, AIPAC, whatever, and erode them from the inside...I don't know if that would make a dent but that's far more realistic than infiltrating mass media or influential churches.
__________________
"What are they? A religion, a race, a criminal conspiracy?" - Craig 'Chain' Cobb on the jews
 
Old January 26th, 2011 #93
John in Woodbridge
Senior Member
 
John in Woodbridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,749
John in Woodbridge
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Q. Ferguson View Post
Let me re-state that. You really think white Christians, historically, have wanted to share a pew with a nigger?
No. How churches behave today is a fairly recent phenomena. I'm talking about going into Africa and bringing back pure blue-gummed niggers and dropping them into white communties like biological time bombs. The Catholic Church routinely advocates amnesty for illegal aliens.
__________________
It’s time to stop being Americans. It’s time to start being White Men again. - Gregory Hood
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #94
Jurgenmac
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 169
Default

This book Caesar's Messiah gave me the biggest laugh for a long time.

Read carefully in parallel Josephus's war of the Jews reveals that most of Jesus's mysterious gabble has anti-semitic meaning. For instand he says he is the water of life to a Samaritan when in the Jewish wars the Samaritans died of thirst fighting the Romans at the same location where Jebo speaks to the woman and similarly there are jokes in relation to cannibal Jews in Jerusalem.
This book appears to be onto something.

The Parallels
The relationship between Jesus and Titus begins on Mount Ger-
izzim, where Jesus calls himself "living water" on the same spot
where Jews would later die of thirst during the war. Because Titus
has not received control over the army when that battle occurs, the
authors of the Gospels have Jesus announce that "my time has not
yet come"—in other words, that his ministry had not yet begun—to
maintain the parallelism between his ministry and Titus' campaign.
Jesus then begins his ministry at the Sea of Galilee, where he
gathers in his disciples, who he calls "fishers of men." Titus also has
the "onset" of his campaign at the same location, where his "disci-
ples" become "fishers of men" by spearing Jews as they attempt to
swim for safety after the Romans sink their boats.
Jesus next encounters a possessed man at Gadara who unleashes
a "legion" of demons that possess a herd of swine and rush wildly
into the Jordan river. Titus has a strangely parallel experience at
Gadara, where one "demonically possessed" man unleashed a legion
of "demons"—that is, the Sicarii—who infect a herd of "swine"—
that is, Jewish youth. The combined group is then chased by the
Romans and rushes "like the wildest of beasts" into the Jordan river.
Following the Gadara encounter, the "son of Mary" travels to
Jerusalem where he informs his disciples that they will one day "eat
of his flesh." This prophecy comes to pass when a "son of Mary" is
eaten by his mother during Titus' siege of Jerusalem.
The Gospels next describe two assaults on the Mount of Olives,
one in which a naked man escapes and another in which the Mes-
siah is captured. These episodes parallel events on the Mount of
Olives during Titus' siege of Jerusalem, where a "naked" man—
Titus—escapes, and a Messiah is captured.
The pair of Mount of Olives assaults is followed in both the
Gospels and Titus' campaign by a description of three crucified men,
one of whom miraculously survives. In each version, an individual
named "Joseph of Arimathea" (Joseph Bar Matthias) takes the sur-
vivor down from the cross.
336 CAESAR'S MESSIAH
Jesus concludes his ministry by predicting that Simon will be
taken to Rome and martyred, but that John will be spared. At the
conclusion of Titus' campaign, the rebel leaders Simon and John are
captured. Simon is taken to Rome and martyred, but John is spared
and given life imprisonment.
Each one of these parallels is unusual enough to raise the ques-
tion of whether it was created intentionally. The fact that the paral-
lels occur in the same order lays the matter to rest, because such a
sequence could not occur accidently Further, Titus was the only
individual, other than Jesus, who could have been the "Son of Man"
foreseen in the Gospels. Titus was the only individual in history who
encircled Jerusalem with a wall and demolished its temple. The fact
that the campaign of this unique individual parallels Christ's min-
istry confirms the proposition that the two were deliberately linked,
since such a combination of historical singularities could not have
occurred circumstantially.
The Daniel-Moses Combination
This work has shown that, without question, Josephus manipulated
the dates of events to create the impression that the prophecies of
Daniel were coming to pass in the first century C.E. In doing so,
Josephus, accidentally or otherwise, provided a fictitious historical
context for Jesus, who claimed to be the Messiah that Daniel had
envisioned.
The authors of the Gospels also inserted numerous parallels
with the life of Moses into their story of Jesus so as to make it appear
that he was, like Moses, the founder of a new, divinely inspired reli-
gion. Josephus linked his history to this theme by recording that the
war with the Jews came to an end forty years to the day after Jesus'
resurrection. In doing so, he created the impression that Christianity
had mirrored Judaism's forty years of wandering following the orig-
inal Passover. Only by concluding the war on that date, the fifteenth
of Nisan, 73 C.E., could Josephus have simultaneously "fulfilled" both
the seven-year cycle of tribulation envisioned by Daniel—the pre-
cise length of the war—and completed Christianity's mirroring of the
events following the original Passover. The dual linkage between the
Gospels and War of the Jews proves that the parallels were created
Conclusion 337
deliberately because two separate authors could not have recorded
such a combination of precise prophecies and dates by chance.
The Puzzle of the Empty Tomb
My reading of the combined story of Jesus' resurrection is perhaps
the clearest proof of the Flavian origin of Christianity. This is be-
cause the story was designed to be a way of proving beyond a doubt
that creating the Gospels as satire was the real intent of its authors.
This proof also has the advantage of being, if incorrect, so easy to
disprove. Experts in probability can either confirm or deny the con-
clusions in this work and the truth will out.
This work was in no way created as a criticism of the faith of
contemporary Christians. I felt required to present my findings
because of the light they shed on the origin and purpose of both
anti-Semitism and the moral structure of Western societies.
I realize that some will find the conclusions of this work disori-
enting. Symbols long thought to have been based on Christian love
may really be images of Roman conquest. Even the belief that our
culture is Judeo-Christian may be incorrect, in that it may have been
completely shaped by Roman "religious" influence. Most unnerving
to me is this question: What would Western civilization be like if,
instead of emerging from the Christian tradition, it had emerged
from a culture that worshiped strength and scorned weakness?
It is also hard to accept that so many have missed the obvious
clues left by the creators of Christianity to inform us of the true ori-
gin of the religion. While many of the puzzles are difficult to see and
solve, it is simply amazing that no one has noticed heretofore that
Titus' campaign had a conceptual outline parallel to Jesus' ministry.
This is not a difficult thing to see and should have been common
knowledge centuries earlier. Homo sapiens failed to earn its title in
this instance.
Though Christianity may have begun as a cruel joke, it has
become the basis for much of humankind's moral progress. I present
this work with great ambivalence, but truth is a whole, and no part
should be hidden. During the turmoil that is about to descend, we
should all remember the words of Jesus: "And you shall know the
truth, and the truth shall set you free."
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #95
Metal Warrior
Leaving a bruise
 
Metal Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Land o' Bears, PA
Posts: 1,652
Metal Warrior
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by procopius View Post
The Vikings peacefully converted over time as well. There was no military expedition into Scandinavia from the Christians. The Christians of Europe barely had a standing military in their lands (during the time of Vikings), and of course, this made them easy prey to Viking raids.
The Kristjan leaders absolutely used force to convert Scandinavian heathens (who didn't fully capitulate until the 15th Century), as exemplified by the actions of the pompous "St." Olaf Tryggvason:
Quote:
Olaf routinely used violence, torture or death to attempt to force conversions. Several instances of Olaf's attempts lead to days of remembrance amongst modern heathens similar manner to feast days of martyred Christian saints. Raud the Strong (remembered January 9) refused to convert and, after a failed attempt using a wooden pin to pry open his mouth to insert a snake, was killed by a snake goaded by a hot poker through a drinking horn into Raud's mouth and down his throat. Eyvind Kinnrifi (February 9) likewise refused and was killed by a brazier of hot coals resting on his belly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by procopius View Post
The Norse people were also taught that their Gods would be eventually defeated by evil (the Giants). The Norse knew that Asgard would fall and Valhalla would be no more. Although the Norse Gods were heroic and would certainly go down fighting (as a Norse warrior should), they were just too weak to defeat their enemies.
Wrong, all their enemies, including the Giants (Jotunn) die with them. The conflict is larger than any individual being. Ulysses Crane had it right.

Asa-Thorr's sons are among those who survive Ragnarok (the final conflict between Order, as represented by Thorr and Odhinn; and Chaos, represented by Loki, the Jotunn and Fenris-wolf), along with the daughter of the Sun and the humans Lif and Lifthrasir to repopulate a world of order and enlightenment. A wholesome, respectable White world which many of us would feel quite comfortable in.

It's all symbolic to us anyway, just an ancient European way of explaining human behaviors and physical phenomena they didn't quite have a handle on.
__________________
This message is hidden because Dan_O is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because N.M. Valdez is on your ignore list.

Last edited by Metal Warrior; January 27th, 2011 at 09:28 AM.
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #96
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,050
Fred Streed
Default

It's good to have some guys posting who actually have some knowledge about a Pagan religion, such as Metal Warrior and Ulysses Crane. This knowledge is important because it reconnects us with the spirituality of our ancestors, something the Jesus culties have done their best to suppress. The remarkable thing about the Northern European beliefs is how in tune it was with reality. By that I mean their ideas about chaos and order, their ideas on the cyclic nature of the world, with none of the world-denying turn-the-other-cheek crap of xtianity.
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #97
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,375
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad Charles View Post
Yes, which I believe was Hitler's view as well. Instead of making martyrs out of people (the Christians really do have a taste for that since time immemorial) by attacking the churches it really would have been best to just let them erode naturally. Seeing how great Nazi Germany really was I think that was just the place for it to happen. It had the culture and the scientific advancements to accomplish such a feat.
The most important thing is to keep christ cult influence out of politics. So if there's a White government, all it has to do is inform the preacher class it won't tolerate any teaching against the official doctrine on race. That's the grounding of the new state, and any teaching against it will be executed. It has to be that serious. The christ lunatic leaders have proven nothing if not that they're flexible, so I don't see this being a problem. The scriptures, as has been said, will support any political reading, including WN.

That is the short-term policy. The long term policy is to wean people away from the insanity christ lunacy represents. This is not so simple a matter as it appears, because the lunacy is partly based in genetics - ie, simple animal fear, conformism, and stupidity. Those things don't just go away because we don't like them. They must be, rather, channeled more effectively that christ-insanity channels them, while some kind of tolerable eugenics is practiced to raise the average IQ to a level (i'd say around 130) where craziness like the christ cult becomes less attractive. As I say, this is not something that happens overnight. At the same time the above is going on, you develop what I've called The Defenders, as an elite racial-protection class. This could be somewhat like the SS - it would have intellectual, moral and physical qualifications. This would be looked up to by the people. It would be as incorruptible as anything human can be, and it would set the model for interactions on the popular level. Of course, this is easy, easy, easy to write and say, but not so easy to make work in reality. But I do believe it is possible to have a society in which the average, repeat, average, person is not drawn to government or Jebus as the solution to all his ills. The principle of subsidiarity is solid and must be insisted on. The government and the man both have their place, and must be kept/forced to it. The man must carry his weight; the government must do only what it exists to do.
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #98
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,375
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Fairy tales should be compared with religion. Fairy tales convey the magic and mystery of the world without the moralizing and the lie that the stories they contain are actually literally true. Fairy tales show what kind of consequences certain actions bring. They teach the truth through stories without any need to moralize or posit nonexistent afterlife.

Christianity is for dogs, not men. Fairy tales are for men.
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #99
Fred Streed
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,050
Fred Streed
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad Charles View Post
I have to agree with you here on the "antagonizing" because really - how many Christians really believe anyway?
It was my former position that we should avoid making a fuss over xtianity. I have since came to realize just what an impediment the christinsanity is to clear thinking on matters of race and the jew.
The poison has filtered throughout our culture and shows up in places where you would never expect. Even in people who are convinced they are free of the superstitions of the working peasants. An example is the "violence doesn't solve anything" mindset prevalent in liberals. They send their sons off to school with niggers and spics after drilling this lie into their heads. Or the idea that the jews are somehow special prevalent in so many educated, fairly intelligent people, many of whom probably consider themselves atheists or agnostic or part of some new-age crap.

We need clear thinking on racial issues. Xtianity by it's nature, with it's insistence on spooks and impossibilities, clouds the issue. Worse yet is it's insistence on unnatural and impossible morality.

Last edited by Fred Streed; January 27th, 2011 at 02:31 PM.
 
Old January 27th, 2011 #100
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,375
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Just as men should not yield to women, commense sense should never yield to christ-insanity.

How many of our current miseries can be traced to just those yieldings.
 
Reply

Tags
#1, christianity

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.
Page generated in 0.13520 seconds.