Conservatism in actiona: Hitler encountering jews in Vienna

[Alex Linder]

Mein Kampf, ch 2

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...inKampfch2.htm

Today's conservatives never delve to the 'why' of our problems. They really aren't sure who "we" are, if we take their public words. Jared Taylor is a man who devotes his entire life to studying the symptoms of grave social problems, yet never once names the disease, nor renders diagnosis. If that isn't serving some ulterior purpose, that is just plain sick. Think about it. Jaredism is the politics of the cul de sac; the cultivation of frustration for its own sake.

What a contrast to Hitler, who arrives in Vienna with no pariticular impression of jews. Slowly he pieces together the puzzle; always carefully, always fairly rendering judgment. He builds a picture of the different layers of Viennese society, and how they interact. He builds up an accurate notion of the meaning and purpose of the papers and the people who produce them. Same with the Social Democrats (Marxists) He never quits till he achieves clarity with regard to the causative agent. One reason conservatives never
win is they never fight. As Hitler said:

"It is not enough that you believe, you must fight."

[Bernie]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

Mein Kampf, ch 2



Today's conservatives never delve to the 'why' of our problems. They really aren't sure who "we" are, if we take their public words. Jared Taylor is a man who devotes his entire life to studying the symptoms of grave social problems, yet never once names the disease, nor renders diagnosis. If that isn't serving some ulterior purpose, that is just plain sick. Think about it. Jaredism is the politics of the cul de act; the cultivation of frustration for its own sake.

What a contrast to Hitler, who arrives in Vienna with no pariticular impression of jews.

Yes,

But Jared knows what would happen were he to speak up, he'd be barred from writing, something he's very good at. Just as you criticise Pat Buchanan for much the same thing. Jared and Pat understand completely the extent to which they can go, that line in the sand.

Hitler arrived in Vienna long before he had aspirations of National Leadership. I dare say many a Viennese would have had much the same view of the Jews in Austria as did Hitler. After that terrible First World War Germany was almost in anarchy. Hitler skillfully used pent up resentment of Jews as a tool to gain electoral support. He and much of Germany knew what was going down in the communist 'workers paradise'. Gulags, NKVD Visits in the dead of night, Churches burnt down, Priests and Nuns murdered etc. 1920'to 1930's Germany, dare I say it, was a Freer society that the USA today. The Jew has a grip on America that Goebbels would envy.

No change will happen in the US until the Zionist Jew has had his control of the of the Media taken away.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Bernie

Yes,

But Jared knows what would happen were he to speak up, he'd be barred from writing, something he's very good at. Just as you criticise Pat Buchanan for much the same thing. Jared and Pat understand completely the extent to which they can go, that line in the sand.

Hitler arrived in Vienna long before he had aspirations of National Leadership. I dare say many a Viennese would have had much the same view of the Jews in Austria as did Hitler. After that terrible First World War Germany was almost in anarchy. Hitler skillfully used pent up resentment of Jews as a tool to gain electoral support. He and much of Germany knew what was going down in the communist 'workers paradise'. Gulags, NKVD Visits in the dead of night, Churches burnt down, Priests and Nuns murdered etc. 1920'to 1930's Germany, dare I say it, was a Freer society that the USA today. The Jew has a grip on America that Goebbels would envy.

No change will happen in the US until the Zionist Jew has had his control of the of the Media taken away.

Taylor doesn't get published in the controlled media anyway. At best he gets maybe one LTE to a jewpaper a year. And an appearance on a talk show. The rest of his time is spent trying to persuade people of things they already believe, namely that Mexicans belong in Mexico, and blacks are dangerous criminals.

As I've said for five years now, the place the education is needed, and the place public words have any use whatsoever is on the jew issue. If you don't explicitly make the link between jewish policies and anti-Aryan politics, you're wasting your time. Dr. Pierce made the link and he got much more mainstream media attention than Jared Taylor. It looks to me like Taylor intends to do to racialism what Buckley did to conservatism: make it safe for jews, and neuter it as as vehicle for Aryan interests.

Anybody at this late time who imagines Pat Buchanan is effective let alone on our side can't see straight. Pat Buchanan and Jared Taylor are part of the problem, and the fact that in certain cases their words inadvertently function as a gateway to true racialism should not accrue to their credit; otherwise you might as well credit Rush Limbaugh and Larry Elder.

[Derrick Beukeboom]

Instinctively Whites equate the nonwhite peoples with danger, filth, corruption, violence, ignorance and just overall foreigness. So, it is preaching to the choir in the macro sense the issues of the nonwhites and their acquisition of our nation and its resources.

As Alex has stated, the jewish question is far and away the most important issue at this time.
The jews are able to pretend they are 'White' or just like any other White Ethnic group, like say the Greeks or Italians.
This is the fundamental problem in a nutshell.
If/When the jews are Id'ed for what they are, then perhaps we have solid hope of pushing the jews away from the Aryan nations.
Part of the problem is the mentality and ignorance of the jews to the majority of Whites out there.

[Antiochus Epiphanes]

Right Derrick and yet I think in the past, people knew better that they were "separate" and a "people who shall dwell alone." why the difference between now and say the 1930s when well known and liked English conservative Catholic author Hillaire Belloc wrote "the Jews?" a book much referenced in WGS WWWM...

Or are we talking about a difference between the US and Europe; are the British wiser to Jews than we?

Or is this a function of the continuing decline and retreat of Christianity as a requisite factor in public participation? Which arguably marks a big difference for Jews in the US where society has long been far more secular and thus less demonstrative of their differences from us?

and whatever you think of those questions-- always I ask, how to recapture conservativism from its fatal embrace with Jewry?

[Derrick Beukeboom]

As per your questions, I do think that the overall opinion of "the jews" has fundamentally changed over time. Even in the 1950's (only a decade after WW2), the jews were widely known for being a clannish, difficult and basically foreign sort of a peculiar tribe......and this within the still mostly Aryan USA of this time period.
My how things have changed,

Spiritually and socially, we have become a very jewish sort of place.
Evangelical christians have a certain fetish for the jews and Israel which really only came forth within the last 10-15 years or so.
Commerically, the far majority of our entertainment comes forth from the jewish perspective.

The jewish spirit is thriving in money grubbing American society. In some ways, the jews can be more at home here than in Israel where there are numerous muslims who would like to take a few jews out.
No such problem for the jews here.

Jewish spirit (if not jews and white jews) effectively controls the US federal government.
The term "zog" is not an exageration.

The power of the jews has always been their intrinsic ability to attach themselves to the host nation and destroy it from within.
This is the jewish spirit in a nutshell.
In some ways, it is a most effective sociological survival strategy.
Thus, the host if he even learns of the jews in time, is often forced to basically destroy his own self to rid the jews as well.
Complicated cultural phenomenon.

So, in 2005 america you have jewish spirit permeating through everything from born again churches who worship jews and Israel to large financial institutions to hollywood entertainment to media influence to federal govt. policy decisions.

At this time, the jews must be mentioned are we are pissing in the wind.

[Antiochus Epiphanes]

Derrick, I think that Hitler's example is instructive for us as Americans, who live in a very secular society, in defeating Jewry especially because, Germany's expulsion was essentially secular whereas the preceeding expulsions were essentially religious.. although KMD suggests that a biological view of Jews as a race may have began in the post-Spanish expulsion environment with "limpieza de sangre" laws against crypto-Jews ie marranos.

One book I have recently seen that details the NS regime's specific measures to root out Jewish influence from Germany is the Koontz book

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/2...0205ProCh1.htm

you might find this book instructive as it details specific efforts by the NS to take over all aspects of German society such as academia. It is "Frankfurt school in reverse" described blow by blow.

The author is anti-NS of course but you can easily take the lessons to be learned.

[cg jung]

Originally Posted by Bernie

Yes,

But Jared knows what would happen were he to speak up, he'd be barred from writing, something he's very good at. Just as you criticise Pat Buchanan for much the same thing. Jared and Pat understand completely the extent to which they can go, that line in the sand.

Hitler arrived in Vienna long before he had aspirations of National Leadership. I dare say many a Viennese would have had much the same view of the Jews in Austria as did Hitler. After that terrible First World War Germany was almost in anarchy. Hitler skillfully used pent up resentment of Jews as a tool to gain electoral support. He and much of Germany knew what was going down in the communist 'workers paradise'. Gulags, NKVD Visits in the dead of night, Churches burnt down, Priests and Nuns murdered etc. 1920'to 1930's Germany, dare I say it, was a Freer society that the USA today. The Jew has a grip on America that Goebbels would envy.

No change will happen in the US until the Zionist Jew has had his control of the of the Media taken away.

Buchanan mentions Israel or alludes to the Jew (Neo's) more in one column than Taylor has in a lifetime. Taylor is an arrogant bastard that lives in a fifties time warp when elites like him knew better for whites as well as "themz blackies". What Taylor wants is to be socially acceptable to the Jew... no more, no less.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Antiochus Epiphanes

and whatever you think of those questions-- always I ask, how to recapture conservativism from its fatal embrace with Jewry?

How did Nazism fail to be captured by jews?

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by cg jung

Buchanan mentions Israel or alludes to the Jew (Neo's) more in one column than Taylor has in a lifetime. Taylor is an arrogant bastard that lives in a fifties time warp when elites like him knew better for whites as well as "themz blackies". What Taylor wants is to be socially acceptable to the Jew... no more, no less.

I believe that's more or less right. What I've always said...

The WASP cannot deal with the jew as the jew must be dealt with in order to defeat him. WASP culture is civil -- you OVERLOOK the flaws of the fellow in front of you, and laugh about them, and feel superior, in private. That is WASP culture. It is a very sideways looking thing, always fearful it will be caught out, doing or saying what "isn't done."

Jew culture is get in your face and whine and make demands, and harry the target until it gives in.

WASP culture cannot cope with the jew. I suspect in many ways it lost out to it in America because it grudgingly admired its ambition and cunning, although it never cared much for its style, which is basically obnoxious-and-proud-of-it combined with outlawing-anyone-who-feels-different.

The WASP cult of civility forces you to overlook motives, whereas the jews hardly do anything but motive-spot.

The way to defeat the jew is to go directly at it. Name it, explain what it is doing, stand up in public and say that you oppose it. This not only draws the strongest to you, it trumps the opposition. The jew can't pull the old "racist" or "anti-semite" card on those who respond "you'd better believe it, bubbele!"

Only a man prepared to act like this will gain followers. Buchanan got a few people because he was on tv, and because people were desperate for a leader and willing to project their hopes on any plausible target. But in the end Buchanan proved nothing but a Catholic. Unwilling to fight, for all his putative pugnacity. All God's chillun got souls, you know. Buchanan has foamed hatred on racists many times. Catholics, of course, are trained to look upward for guidance. Buchanan follows his priest, who follows his Pope, who follows Abe Foxman. These inform Buchanan that it is fitting and proper than he vent his cloaca on racists, perfectly proper and moral. By contrast, Buchanan always approaches the jews with hat in hand, kind of the way the Pope kneels before Foxman. Buchanan's complaints about jews are always fact-based and studiously neutral in tone. Do you want this fellow, who knows who counts and who doesn't leading the way? Do you trust him? How can he be a revolutionary when he acts respectful toward the dictators and resentful toward the Aryan rebels?

Saving masses or saving defective institutions isn't worth the trouble. If there were anything substantial in conservatism in the first place, jews wouldn't have been able to take it over in barely a decade. Good books, good ideas, good writers - conservatism has plenty to draw from. But good institutions, no. There isn't one I'm aware of that isn't jew-egalitarian in its core.

What is needed is an organization, for lack of a precise term, built on a foundation of pro-Aryanism and anti-jewism. Otherwise you're building on sand.

If you aren't overtly, publicly, for reasons of principle, opposed to the jews, and don't state this forthrightly, then the jews will join your group and soon take it over.

They're very pushy people. Half-measures don't phase them in the slightest, they aren't Aryans. They are genetically paranoid, aggressive, xenophobic and blind to self-presentation as Aryan goy would feel it. That is, they're incapable of embarrassment. They aren't the great masters of the lie and the trading bazaar for nothing. The only thing people as pushy as the jews understand is someone else pushing back even harder. Do you think Jared Taylor has the capacity to do that?

If you leave the door open, the semitic sandfolk will come pouring through. And after all, they have a lot more connections to money and media than you or I do. Do you think they'll be happy paying the piper without calling the tune? Does Jared Taylor allow criticism of jews in AmRen?

I remember one of our correspondents attended his conference, and wrote a nice review. Taylor linked to it. In one-point type, the smallest possible. That shows you the size of the man.

There's no way to slick it. There's no way to sneak in the back door. There's no way to make our own long march through the institutions. The best that can be done is set up an organization that names the Aryan race as that which it seeks to defend, and the jew as the main enemy against which defense is required. Those happy with the Republicans have a place to go. Those happy with the Democrats have a place to go. Those who want to live as Aryans among Aryans at long last -- finally -- will have a place to go. Those too dim to see that jews created the legal and social matrix in which Aryan aims are literally illegal won't be won over by argument, but by success achieved by a hardened core of True Believers. The Republicans and Democrats can offer material benefits. But only an Aryan party can offer spiritual rebirth and integrity and the political prospect of a life worth living in a community worth dying to bring about. Remember that almost nobody believes in either the Republicans or the Democrats. Most people don't vote. They rightly reckon their vote will not make a difference because the important things are never on the ballot. The Republican and Democrat parties are for children. An Aryan party would be for adults - men who mean to take the most important decisions affecting their lives, rather than turn them over to jew-controlled, lesbian-and-minority staffed bureaucrats.

It is freedom of association above all the jew seeks to do away with, and so it is separation from the jew and his crummy amalgam of moralizing and materialism that above all we must achieve and represent. Physical, economic, mental separation - we must live in and create a new world. We begin with an alternative conception, and make it real. Time and time again groups have done this in America. The American way, itz.

The verdict is in: AmeriKwa, now exactly 40 years old, is a gross disimprovement on the land of the Founders -- a gross failure. The battle is on for what comes next. Saving conservatism or other rotting/dead institutions is as pointless as trying to resurrect a log on the forest floor. Rather we use its nutrients to rise up through the jewish canopy toward the sun, as fresh white hardwood.

[Polybius]

Alex, I wouldn't get into re-inventing the wheel.

The two big political parties in the US are franchise operations. You buy the franchise as cheaply as you can, and you make the best of it.

The nice thing is that with our White American politics based on our Founders, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, we have the high ground. We also have the numbers. We can shift the debate our way even if we lose, and the same with public opinion.

Btw, the only founder the Republicoons' have is the mulatto elitist Hamilton.

$$$$$$$$$$$

I'm hoping that VNN will be able to send you, or a reporter to cover the attempted lynching/character assasination of the ordained Baptist minister in Mississsippi by the jews.

I am sure there are two sides to the story.

[Alex Linder]

Originally Posted by Polybius

Alex, I wouldn't get into re-inventing the wheel.

The two big political parties in the US are franchise operations. You buy the franchise as cheaply as you can, and you make the best of it.

The nice thing is that with our White American politics based on our Founders, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, we have the high ground. We also have the numbers. We can shift the debate our way even if we lose, and the same with public opinion.

Btw, the only founder the Republicoons' have is the mulatto elitist Hamilton.

$$$$$$$$$$$

I'm hoping that VNN will be able to send you, or a reporter to cover the attempted lynching/character assasination of the ordained Baptist minister in Mississsippi by the jews.

I am sure there are two sides to the story.

When's the trial?

A party can exist and run people as 'cunts and demdogs. We give the Sam Francis pussies room to maneuver. They use us as the bad guys, while they're the good "responsible" -- ie, do-nothing -- brigade.

You'll note the folks who think themselves clever always clairvoyantly know that the cannies are speaking code. Smart folks are often stupidest, functionally. You can't outlie a jew, anymore than you can outjump a nigger. They're made for it. Our strength is their weakness. We don't have to lie, not strategically. We have to tell the truth with Aryan daring, and Aryan implacability. Revolutions are made by lean and hungry men, not fat winkers.

[Polybius]

Originally Posted by Alex Linder

When's the trial?

A party can exist and run people as 'cunts and demdogs. We give the Sam Francis pussies room to maneuver. They use us as the bad guys, while they're the good "responsible" -- ie, do-nothing -- brigade.

You'll note the folks who think themselves clever always clairvoyantly know that the cannies are speaking code. Smart folks are often stupidest, functionally. You can't outlie a jew, anymore than you can outjump a nigger. They're made for it. Our strength is their weakness. We don't have to lie, not strategically. We have to tell the truth with Aryan daring, and Aryan implacability. Revolutions are made by lean and hungry men, not fat winkers.

We should be smart enough, to get our message across using the established political vehicles, and be able to shift public opinion and the debate our way.

Third party efforts are a waste of time and money.