|
September 29th, 2018 | #1281 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
Gratitude
Blog post re the concept of gratitude...who deserves your gratitude? A story with all the ear-markings of myth re a 'spotless Jew lamb' who died and claims it's because you are 'bad'; or YOUR BLOOD relation/ancestors who tried to live so that you too could do so?
Whose spilled blood is 'precious' and whose is alien to you? This post touches on that concept and the so-called 'fixed creation' that we know did not occur, and the 'fall' that we know did not occur, because we have the evidence that these Marvel Comic stories are fallacious, because of things like: 1. The very first extinction event, the end-Ordovician, was 450 million years ago. 2. There were five mass extinctions of every living thing on earth, none of which was the same as what we have today because of the different atmosphere on each one. 3. The earth’s atmosphere at the FIRST creation had thin air unlike today's, which we know from studying the bubbles in 2.7-billion-year-old lava fields. Earth’s ancient air was half as thick as today’s air. 4. I show the neurological research that corroborates Julian Jaynes Bicameral Mind theory regarding the 'talking snake' and the 'talking donkey' in the book of Numbers and the 'talking god' throughout the OT. 5. And of course we know there was no perfect garden if no fixed creation: and we can further prove that up with the first 'predator' on the earth, which was 540 million years ago in creatures we call the anomalocaridids. That pesky Science. And perhaps even stronger that pesky loyalty one has to their own blood, that they feel a biological pull toward, is forever the 'thorn in the side' of the Christ cult. https://jewicidaltendencies.wordpres...lived-for-you/
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier Last edited by Emily Henderson; September 29th, 2018 at 12:14 AM. Reason: needed divine intervention to remind me that it's 'whose' not 'who's'. |
October 9th, 2018 | #1282 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 19
|
Quote:
|
|
October 10th, 2018 | #1283 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Normal Area
Posts: 714
|
__________________
White people need an anti-defamation league more than anyone. What "anti-semites" say about jews is true and hence can not be defamation. |
October 12th, 2018 | #1284 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Quote:
|
|
October 17th, 2018 | #1285 |
Intellijintly Dezined
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Pre-Rapture, USA ⚛️
Posts: 3,871
|
No Census, No Women Reporting on the Risen Joo...
How simple it is in 2018, regarding some things, to find out whether they are truth or fiction.
Therefore we should not be stupefied like peasants from the way-back, simply because of attachments and familiarity to stories. If a story ends up being a fairy-tale, so be it. If you're of a White Western mentality, you will want to know, and act accordingly. https://jewicidaltendencies.wordpres...ife-with-myth/
__________________
"Inquiry and doubt are essential checks against deception."--Richard Carrier |
October 24th, 2018 | #1286 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,685
|
Stormfront's anti-White lunatic Elcyrus
Quote:
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race ''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers |
|
October 24th, 2018 | #1287 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 8,105
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
December 5th, 2018 | #1288 | ||
A White ethnic group too
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Crackertown, down yonder in a honkey home, away from Multicultia :)
Posts: 142
Blog Entries: 3
|
Quote:
Quote:
On the previous page, I was documenting how Hitler was part of the problem by banning all non-Christian organizations, stating he was a Cackolick (Catholic) for life, making Positive Christianity his party's religious program, etc. Hitler went on to treat the Germans like little Christard sheeple, shepherding 8 million of them to the slaughterhouse by 1945 for his insane teetotaler, vegetarian, childless, marriage-less Cathylick ego trip. The left likes panting us as Nazis, but we're not since most of us hate Christianity.
__________________
True diversity is preserving all ethnic groups. We ought to have community centers for us, to have closure for our history, celebrate our heritage & look to the future. National Folk Faith AFA CT :) Last edited by John Smithwick; December 11th, 2018 at 10:31 AM. |
||
December 9th, 2018 | #1289 |
Senior Member
|
Christianity & Nationalism:
A Cautionary Tale Robert Hampton Charles Maurras 1,412 words The arguments over identitarians should embrace or abandon Christianity is a question that still remains unresolved within the broader movement. Last week, Quintilian entered the fray and offered a reasoned argument for why white nationalists should embrace Christianity. The writer believes that white nationalists have fallen prey to the corrupted image of modern Christianity and fail to see the glory of the traditional faith. According to Quintilian, Christianity is essential to the creation of an ethnostate and nationalists must strive to restore it to its traditional state. But identitarians should be wary of the possibility that a restored and conservative Christianity would be amenable to our cause. In fact, this resurgent Christianity may be more inclined to fight against our movement, regardless of however much we profess our devotion to the faith. Quintilian deplores Vatican II as the event that destroyed the historical religion, but the Church was hostile to our beliefs many long before the bishops met in Rome in 1962. Take for instance the tragic tale of the Action Française.[1] Charles Maurras’s reactionary nationalist movement wanted to restore the monarchy, end the separation of church and state, and uphold France’s traditional Catholic identity. It was firmly opposed to liberalism and many of its economic and political beliefs were firmly in line with Catholic social teaching. Maurras himself was an agnostic, but he argued for the necessity of the Catholic faith and was extremely careful in allaying clerical fears about his irreligion. This should have been a movement the Church fully supported, and in its early years, many clerics did. The movement provided most of the militant activists in Catholic battles against the forces of secularism and liberalism in the first decades of the 20th century. Yet, many Church intellectuals began to suspect the Action Française of being too militant, too political, too nationalist, and too, hilariously enough, pagan. Clerics began to suspect the nationalists were drawing young Catholics to an ideology not controlled by the Church. Church leaders preferred a safer political outlet that directed the youth to follow the instructions of priests, not pro-Catholic agnostics. In 1926, the Vatican issued a formal condemnation against the Action Française, put their publications on the index liborum prohibitorum, denied communion to anyone associated with the movement, and purged sympathizers from the clergy. This was the pre-Vatican II church led by a conservative pope. Unlike any Right-wing movement today, Action Française had plenty of bishops who were willing to vouch for the proper Christianity of Maurras’s newspaper and politics. Right before the condemnation, the movement’s leaders pleaded with Catholic authorities that they were true to the faith. All of this was for naught as the Church happily kneecapped an allied movement that it could not control. This condemnation was not enacted by liberal modernists who wanted the Church to be more tolerant and heterodox. Maurras was attacked for failing to adhere to traditional dogma and his lack of genuine piety. His movement was seen as dangerous because it made the youth too nationalist and too enamored with classical ideals. Catholic leaders did not oppose the movement because of its anti-liberalism–it was simply because Action wasn’t directly controlled by the Church and its unorthodox ideas were more popular than Church-sanctioned ones. The Church was also hostile to the Falange for the same reasons it condemned the Action Française, along with the accusation José Antonio Primo de Rivera was a “Bolshevik” for wanting sensible social reforms. Even though the Falange was firmly opposed to liberalism, defended the Church from Left-wing attacks, and emphasized Spain’s traditional Catholic identity, Church authorities did not like the movement because of its ultra-nationalism, alleged crypto-paganism, and masculine values.[2] This hostility was par for the course for the conservative Pope Pius XI, who served as the vicar of Christ for much of this time period. Pius XI is considered a man who upheld traditional church teachings against the modernists Pope Pius X despised and is altogether a representative of the era Quintilian wishes the West to return to. However, Pius XI’s Christianity was strongly opposed to racialism and nationalism. He spoke out several times against racial thinking, emphasizing that “catholic meant universal” and to divide the world by nationality and race is “contrary to the faith of Christ.” He ordered the drafting of an encyclical that would aggressively condemn racialism and anti-Semitism shortly before he died in 1939. The encyclical was never published, but many of its ideas found their way in the first encyclical of Pius XI’s successor, Pius XII. That work, Summi Pontifactus, claimed there were no real racial differences as we are all part of one human race. Quintilian blames modernism for the ultimate corruption of the Church, and this may be true when it comes to the god-awful liturgy of modern masses. But modernism is not what made the Church racially egalitarian and hostile toward nationalist movements. It is a feature that has been found in Christianity since the beginning and has only been tempered by the needs of secular society. We can see this secular temperance in Poland and Hungary, the two exemplars of the Christian nationalism Quintilian envisions. The relationship between the Church and Eastern European nationalists isn’t as harmonious as one would imagine, but the Church restrains itself on their disagreements due to the demands of secular society. Poland’s leading Catholic bishops have long urged the country to take in non-white migrants and to cease its efforts to purge communists from the judiciary. Some Catholic leaders in the country have gone as far as to deride the immigration policies of the ruling government as “un-Christian.” The Church hierarchy in Hungary is slightly better as they have argued with Pope Francis over the pontiff’s aggressively pro-migrant stance. But even there, prominent Church leaders still urge for more liberal immigration policies, albeit in more mild tones than that of their western colleagues. The reason the Church is more muted in its criticism of nationalism in Poland and Hungary has less to do with them finding identitarian arguments in Thomas Aquinas than in their fear of alienating the flock. The vast majority of Poles and Hungarians want to keep their countries white, regardless of whether that desire comports to church teaching. Throughout the centuries, the Church has adapted its teachings and tone to reach the widest audience. Secular liberalism’s domination of Western Europe and America makes the Church try to sound nicer on LGBT issues and pitch God as your personal therapist. In a society where nationalists control the discourse, the Church would similarly adapt to those circumstances, as Greg Johnson has pointed out. But you first must gain power and dramatically change the culture to see this effect. A white nationalist-driven “restoration” of Christianity outside of a seizure of power is not going to happen. Institutional Christianity will continue to oppose us until that day comes, regardless of how Christian we appear today. Just ask Italy’s Lega, which seeks to put crucifixes back in classrooms and claims the Gospel as its foundation. The nationalist party receives only hostility from the Church. The resurgence of a more traditionalist Christianity wouldn’t necessarily help our cause. It would see us as an enemy and likely be as hostile to us as the corrupt institutions we face right now. As seen in the example of the Action Française, when you define yourself as a Christian movement, you become beholden to the opinions of priests and pastors. The clergy would want strict adherence to Christian dogma and would not broker “innovative” racialist readings of scripture and tradition. It would prefer we focus on side issues like banning contraceptives rather than protecting our people from demographic replacement. It would tells us African and Latin American Christians are our brothers and that there is no good reason to bar them from our countries. To oppose these measures would risk condemnation and the deflation of our movement. Identitarians must appeal to Christians in order to gain victory, but we mustn’t let ourselves be defined by Christianity. Our best arguments are secular and should appeal to Europeans regardless of whether they are Christian, pagan, or atheist. There is only so much energy and political capital we have and we must choose our battles wisely. To waste our limited energy on restoring Christianity to its pre-20th century state would be a serious error with no real rewards. Notes [1] Eugen Weber, Action Francaise: Royalism and Reaction in Twentieth Century France. [2] Stanley G. Payne, Fascism in Spain: 1923-1977. https://www.counter-currents.com/201...utionary-tale/ |
December 9th, 2018 | #1290 |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Jew S. A.
Posts: 3,679
|
Jesus jewsus. (I can't find the "Lines" thread)
|
December 10th, 2018 | #1291 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: South Texas
Posts: 50
|
Gab's Rob Monster wishes everyone a Happy Hanukkah:
https://gab.com/epik/posts/42930863 Quote:
|
|
December 10th, 2018 | #1292 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
My brain hurts. I just read that entire conversation. The derp is immeasurable. This is why you kill your enemies when you get half a chance.
__________________
Free Palestine. |
|
December 12th, 2018 | #1293 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 19
|
|
January 6th, 2019 | #1294 | |
Senior Member
|
Pope urges EU leaders to show solidarity with refugees off Malta
Sun Jan 6, 2019 04:21PM [Updated: Sun Jan 6, 2019 05:47PM ] HomeEuropeEU Quote:
|
|
January 7th, 2019 | #1295 |
WARFATHER
|
love among my brothers who hate christinsanity
I became frustrated with the religious strife among us and impulsively posted a shoddily composed insult. God knows, my mother dragged me to Sunday school and then through years a sitting beside her and my siblings in church. Long before I attained puberty, Jesus had already become the personification of boredom for me.
Last edited by Widener; January 9th, 2019 at 04:19 PM. |
January 7th, 2019 | #1296 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 849
|
Quote:
They can be killed. Priests aren't supernatural. They can be killed. Christians aren't supernatural. Their men can be killed and their women can be taken as war booty... Thereby solving Jeffrey's problem of not getting laid. But, more importantly, Jews are not supernatural and they can be killed.
__________________
Free Palestine. |
|
January 9th, 2019 | #1297 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: In a dystopian nightmare
Posts: 4,808
|
Well, at least didn't involve diddling kiddies.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/relig...=.7a5e6053bd59
__________________
Political correctness is oppression disguised as good manners. |
January 9th, 2019 | #1298 |
Senior Member
|
Watching court trials is interesting in this aspect. A lot of fruity talk - from Whites - about 'in their heart', 'redemption', 'hoping he comes to terms with it' and so on. And that's people talking about their sons and daughters being brutally murdered by niggers and hispanics. You guys sentence people to death or give them a real life sentence so maybe it's a little justifiable that way. In Sweden, most killers are jailed for perhaps 15 years. What a joke, eh?
Although I must say from watching a lot of documentaries on people being in for life. Just something...deeply inhumane about it. Doesn't seem right. Either you believe in people being able to reform themselves or you don't. So, a more lenient punishment or death. The life sentence doesn't seem to serve any other purpose than satisfying the victim's relatives. Which I'd think is not unimportant but...Either the fella can be reformed or not, in the end. Just seems wishy-washy. |
January 9th, 2019 | #1299 |
Senior Member
|
Public executions would be a thing in my future White-Society.
That'll show the lower classes of our people what we're about. No sick shit like decapitations like the Saudis do but a public hanging? Sure. This guy was hanged as one of the convicted of kidnapping and raping a pregnant woman: https://iranhr.net/en/articles/1064/ |
January 9th, 2019 | #1300 |
Senior Member
|
The jewed so called human rights organizations call it inhumane. It is the opposite. It is the Iranians taking this fucking degenerate by his actions - and showing him what the rest of the Iranians think of it. You do this - we do this. Live with it, scum.
|
Tags |
#1, christianity |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|