Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old April 10th, 2015 #1
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default #1 When Whites Are a Minority...Thread

[point of this thread is to demonstrate that nothing will change, except in the sense of getting worse. whites will still be guilty, they'll be attacked verbally and physically with extra confidence and judicial/media backing. since we are in the "Whiteness Studies" section, consider this an objective study, through the posting and considerations of Examples, of how whites are treated by non-whites and by the media when/where they are the minority.]

Example: South Africa. Whites are 9% of the SA population of perhaps 55m. When their students are violently attacked by niggers at a university, the media side with the attackers.

Racial clashes at CPUT - Why we had separate universities

By Mike Smith

20th of February 2015

Look at this crap happening at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology (CPUT)

CPUT students in race clash

Race clash: CPUT at standstill

So a bunch of black students (about 300) who wanted free education (because they are poor, but always have money for alcohol) went on a rampage on the Bellville Campus of CPUT yesterday at around 16h00.

As usual, when they chimp out, they prevent anybody else from studying or leaving the campus. The blacks shut the gates and prevented the white and coloured students from going home. When a white girl wanted to drive through the gates the boons stoned her car, rocked it and jumped on it. Two white male engineering students rushed to help her and were hit from behind with bricks and the one had a stone thrown in his face. Nevertheless they managed to bravely fight back and open the gates for the other students. Some of the coloured students helped them to keep the gates open and let the other students escape.

These young men are obviously heroes, but as usual the media turns it all around in those reports as if the whites beat up the poor blacks and “shoved them to the ground”. How dramatic hey? 300 boons against about 10 white boys, but the boons are the victims. Go figure. It just makes your blood boil doesn’t it?

Where was campus security? Where was the police? These young men whose fees are all paid up are now in hospital. Their studies disrupted simply because of a bunch of uncivilized savages with an entitlement chip on their shoulders.

You see shit like this and the liberals still ask you why you are a racist.

God help me, because every time I close my eyes I see that quote of Mencken drift past my brain...

http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary...l#comment-form
 
Old April 10th, 2015 #2
Johan
Moderator
 
Johan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,576
Johan
Default

Alex,are you agree that there is no political solution to this "problems".You pointed at the situation in S.A., i follow this closely because i have relatives over there { i get sick of the way the English traitors now blow the big horn over it}.
I think as long Whites don't cooperate with each other,it wil brin nothing against jewish media and other attacks on our race.
 
Old April 11th, 2015 #3
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan View Post
Alex,are you agree that there is no political solution to this "problems".You pointed at the situation in S.A., i follow this closely because i have relatives over there { i get sick of the way the English traitors now blow the big horn over it}.
What do you mean by political solution?

If you mean, is it possible for whites remaining in South Africa to reach an agreement with blacks that blacks will stick to, one which safeguards white rights and allows them to live, say, Orania-style? If you mean that, then no. I don't think it's possible. What has happened in SA is this:

- communist jews, controlling the global press, demonize white South Africa for decades, wearing it down
- its leaders, in order to relieve pressure and garner awards, sell out their people
- the black majority comes to power, apartheid, or white protection, is done away with
- after blacks have political power, and whites are a cringing minority, it still remains true that most of the economic power remains with whites, since, well, they created the assets in the first place
- the blacks put in place anti-white discrimination called BEE - Black Economic Empowerment. they hound whites out of all government jobs, they get rid of them wherever they possibly can, they insistute huge reparations and discriminations law. eventually hundreds of thousands of whites cant even find jobs and are reduced to squatting.
- blacks as of 2015 still are unhappy that white farmers own much land, worth lots of money, and there are still too many white engineers employed keeping the grid up.
- no international funds are interested in investing capital in South Africa because it isn't safe, and so the communist ANC focuses on stealing or dispossessing whites of whatever assets they continue to retain 21 years after the nigger revolution.
- it has been pointed out that altho most jews fled South Africa after the revolution their communists midwifed (joe slovo and ronnie kasrils sp?), a lot of the asset transfer going on today is from white firms to jew-owned firms.

Quote:
I think as long Whites don't cooperate with each other,it wil brin nothing against jewish media and other attacks on our race.
In my opinion the only solution for whites in South Africa is to leave the christian church, form a racial broederbund, and slaughter blacks wholesale until whites regain power. Then quickly as possible: 1) get nukes, 2) extend their martial control as far north as physical barriers make reasonable. Then kill any new blacks who try to enter.

I don't know that the above is possible. Maybe it isn't. But I do know that if they dont, things will keep going the way they are: whites will continue to be slaughtered by the thousands year in and year out; white farmers will eventually be dispossessed, more or less the way it happened in Zimbabwe. Whites will continue to be discriminated against in universities and in jobs. Whites will exist only as hated, despised, slaughtered outsiders in a land they built, subject to across-the-board legal discrimination, ceaseless jewsmedia hostility, and continual black violence.

I don't know if whites can physically retake South Africa, but I don't see any other hope for them.

Last edited by Alex Linder; April 12th, 2015 at 01:14 PM.
 
Old April 12th, 2015 #4
Johan
Moderator
 
Johan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,576
Johan
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post

If you mean, is it possible for whites remaining in South Africa to reach an agreement with blacks that blacks will stick to, one which safeguards white rights and allows them to live, say, Orania-style? If you mean that, then no. I don't think it's possible. What has happened in SA is this:

In my opinion the only solution for whites in South Africa is to leave the christian church, form a racial broederbund, and slaughter blacks wholesale until whites regain power. Then quickly as possible: 1) get nukes, 2) extend their martial control as far north as physical barriers make reasonable. Then kill any new blacks who try to enter.
Correct,beside the zionist influence in projects like Orania.I see nothing in "luxury" ghettos for Whites in black territories.

That's the right solution,this can be only won if the play it on the racial card.In that case it must be Dutch,French,German and English united against all the shit.And that i don't see happen on a short term.
 
Old April 12th, 2015 #5
Olaf Menes
Senior Member
 
Olaf Menes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 775
Olaf Menes
Default

What do you mean....When?


Whites are already a minority! Because the gutless maggot sellout politicians are such cowardly vultures, they have abandoned their own race to secure a financial future for their own worthless offspring.

It is the politicians and media cowards who project this "White Privilege" hoax and the "Only Whites are Racist" mentality. The levels of White libertard garbage, indoctrinated maggots brainwashed by overpriced, ineffective public school systems that teach White children to despise their own race, are replacing those Whites who actually have racial pride and cultural heritage values.

The White race is being turned into garbage mentally and physically to the point they no longer represent the European race at all.

In effect, Whites are already the minority. The only hope lies in the suppression effect.

The only chance lies in the possibility that many Whites will see the utter ruin that the current cultural and social trends will lead to....that they are the people being suppressed by RACISM... the entire European zone... and America...indeed White nations...will end up looking like a Monrovia open sewer slum zone.
 
Old April 12th, 2015 #6
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

nigger judge is outraged that a 3yo shies from niggers after two of them home-invaded her house. he gives the nigger criminals probation.

can hear judge speak thru link
http://www.courier-journal.com/story...fear/25581605/

[this is exactly the type of shit you get where whites are a minority. dissing blacks (anything they dont like) is the only real crime, and whitey will be made to pay for it]
 
Old April 14th, 2015 #7
Samuel Toothgold
Charachature incarnate
 
Samuel Toothgold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Already in accordance with the future Repulsive Tapir Avatar Mandate
Posts: 4,068
Samuel Toothgold
Default

This is how children learn how to lie.
I hope these willfully unarmed parents are also "Christians" (not to get confused with the Pius Brothers or any other benevolence based persons), so that they learn how lies are born.
This is the result of Afirmative Action appointments of a likely Afflete appointed to kolege. Legal studies, like medicine, point out ethics and objectiveness. If this appointment had at least had the intellectual capacity to learn, it wouldn't have punished truth-telling children through awarding a 2nd class acquital.
Imagine a white judge doing likewise, supposing hooded Klan members were to be tried for a crib invasion and then 2nd class acquitting them, because the witnessing Nigglet has nightmares starring hooded persons or avoiding hooded persons in public. Would that white judge complain about hurt feelings?
__________________
youtube.com/watch?v=-EDJRcwQvN4 youtube.com/watch?v=S0lxK5Ot5HA
youtube.com/watch?v=HFv92Lc8FXg
 
Old May 1st, 2015 #8
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johan View Post
Correct,beside the zionist influence in projects like Orania.I see nothing in "luxury" ghettos for Whites in black territories.

That's the right solution,this can be only won if the play it on the racial card.In that case it must be Dutch,French,German and English united against all the shit.And that i don't see happen on a short term.
I'm too far away to know the specifics of what can and should be done. Just know the general intentions of the races involved, their histories of behavior. Whites will be living in a state of war in South Africa until there is radical change, and there is no sign of that coming, or even that any serious group of whites desires to bring it about. So whites will hunker down and continue to get picked off in twos and threes daily. And if there is a change, it is likelier to be a mass slaughter or land expropriation than anything white-positive.
 
Old May 1st, 2015 #9
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

A Destruction of Robin DiAngelo and the Bogus Concept of White Privilege

Found this comment below a typical garbage column by an anti-white consultant pushing the notion of #whiteprivilege, and creator of #whitefragility epithet for whites who resist her garbage. The point here is that this anti-white cliche-loaded set of anti-white stereotypes is being impressed into the tiny, angry minds of the rising demographics of coloreds. They are being taught, almost in so many words, that everything good that whites have was

1) originally created by non-whites
2) was stolen by whites.

When tens of millions of people with this kind of mindset take power, guess what they're going to do?

a) take everything whites own as restitution
b) kill whites off out of vengeance.

And there's going to be a hell of a lot of misery on the way to that end state.

Yes, white geoncide is the ultimate meaning of and intention behind the bogus concept of 'white privilege.' It's an attempt to inculcate guilt in whites and to intimidate them, while simultaneously stoking genocidal rage in coloreds.

It is jews inciting 'minorities' who are 90+ percent of the world's population (!) to commit genocide against our white race.



Quote:
Danielle Tillman Top Commenter
Lol obsession?! Your white world revolves around people of color! You appropriate the culture, create systems to ensue failure, enact laws to guarantee your smooth climb to the American Dream while minorities have to work TWICE as hard just to be told they still aren't good enough. You misconstrue or children's history books to make you look like saviors and make us look like ungrateful savages. Your entire races history is built on the backs of other races. And still walk around naive to your privilege. And we don't consider ourselves victims, we just aren't blind. To sum my comment up, you tried it.
Reply
48 Yesterday at 3:44pm
Here's the column. From this same DiAngelo we've posted elsewhere, possibly in this thread. Loxism is big business. There's dollars in hating whites and attacking them.

Why It's So Hard to Talk to White People About Racism
Posted: 04/30/2015

Dr. Robin DiAngelo explains why white people implode when talking about race.

I am white. I have spent years studying what it means to be white in a society that proclaims race meaningless, yet is deeply divided by race. This is what I have learned: Any white person living in the United States will develop opinions about race simply by swimming in the water of our culture. But mainstream sources -- schools, textbooks, media -- don't provide us with the multiple perspectives we need. Yes, we will develop strong emotionally laden opinions, but they will not be informed opinions. Our socialization renders us racially illiterate. When you add a lack of humility to that illiteracy (because we don't know what we don't know), you get the break-down we so often see when trying to engage white people in meaningful conversations about race. Illiteracy comes from the media denying the lived experiences of whites, which are reflected EVEN in the slanted statistics collected and skewed by the anti-white system.

Mainstream dictionary definitions reduce racism to individual racial prejudice and the intentional actions that result. The people that commit these intentional acts are deemed bad, and those that don't are good. If we are against racism and unaware of committing racist acts, we can't be racist; racism and being a good person have become mutually exclusive. But this definition does little to explain how racial hierarchies are consistently reproduced.

Social scientists understand racism as a multidimensional and highly adaptive system -- a system that ensures an unequal distribution of resources typical socialist claptrap; economic parallel to political - no consideration that whites hugely disporportionately produce those goods, and hugely disproportionately have them redistributed to non-producing blacks and other peoples of failure. nay, because whites work harder, produce more, save more, have more than others, it can only be because of some kind of evil actions on their part - hence racism, the perfect conceptual tool for explaining white success _and_ black failure at the same time. what a godsend! between racial groups. Because whites built and dominate all significant institutions, (often at the expense of and on the uncompensated labor of other groups) blacks have gone from animals crawling around a field stuffing cotton in sacks to the conceivers, creators and builders of the entire nation - only to have their due credit and rewards snatched from them by evil racist whites, their interests are embedded in the foundation of U.S. society. While individual whites may be against racism, they still benefit from the distribution of resources controlled by their group. No acknowledgement that whites conceived and created nearly everything that provides the infrastructure of the lives of all races. All that interests the anti-white is implying that coloreds privileged to live in a wonderful world they could never create or even sustain themselves are somehow owed more than this incredible free-ridership so many of them enjoy (and the rest try to swim here to grab a piece of).

Yes, an individual person of color can sit at the tables of power, but the overwhelming majority of decision-makers will be white. Yes, white people can have problems and face barriers, but systematic racism won't be one of them. This distinction -- between individual prejudice and a system of unequal institutionalized racial power -- is fundamental. One cannot understand how racism functions in the U.S. today if one ignores group power relations.

This is why it is no use arguing with leftists, they are committed to unreason. The left controls the institutions and has for decades. They instituted official anti-white systematic institutionalized RACIAL DISCRIMINATION back in the 1970s, and it has been applied to all companies of any size for five decades now. Yet not a peep about this - even though it fits precisely what she is talking about. Leftists have the power, have had the power for decades -- all academia, media, government bureaucracy sing DiAngelo's anti-white tune -- yet they pretend they are fighting the power. No reasoned argument or evidence can reach them, they simply dismiss it out of hand.

This systemic and institutional control allows those of us who are white in North America to live in a social environment that protects and insulates us from race-based stress. Like those kids being forced to mix with blacks in a public school - at gunpoint? First, why should whites endure race-based stress? They created America. Why shouldn't whites protect their children? Why should they be denied the constitutional protection afforded by free association to secure their living-spaces against nigger criminality? Yet this woman would prefer to see whites rapes and murdered, and she brazenly denies that the system is biased against whites, which is obviously the case since it promotes forced mixing in a thousand ways, all against the express wishes of the white population, reflected in its votes and its behavior. We have organized society to reproduce and reinforce our racial interests and perspectives. Whites have always voted to shut our borders and against legal discrimination against whites, yet both policies remain in place. What this woman is saying is plain wrong. She knows that, which makes her a liar. Further, we are centered in all matters deemed normal, universal, benign, neutral and good. Apparently this anti-white thinks we should replace, say, western medicine with voodoo or witch doctors. Thus, we move through a wholly racialized world with an unracialized identity (e.g. white people can represent all of humanity, people of color can only represent their racial selves). We move through a world we created for our own kind. Like every other animal from beaver to honeybee does. It's only a problem when whites do it. Challenges to this identity become highly stressful and even intolerable. The following are examples of the kinds of challenges that trigger racial stress for white people:

Suggesting that a white person's viewpoint comes from a racialized frame of reference (challenge to objectivity);

People of color talking directly about their own racial perspectives (challenge to white taboos on talking openly about race);

People of color choosing not to protect the racial feelings of white people in regards to race (challenge to white racial expectations and need/entitlement to racial comfort);

People of color not being willing to tell their stories or answer questions about their racial experiences (challenge to the expectation that people of color will serve us);

A fellow white not providing agreement with one's racial perspective (challenge to white solidarity);

Receiving feedback that one's behavior had a racist impact (challenge to white racial innocence);

Suggesting that group membership is significant (challenge to individualism);

An acknowledgment that access is unequal between racial groups (challenge to meritocracy);

Being presented with a person of color in a position of leadership (challenge to white authority);

Being presented with information about other racial groups through, for example, movies in which people of color drive the action but are not in stereotypical roles, or multicultural education (challenge to white centrality).

All these amount to whites are guilty for everything and need to be punished. They need to be discredited and disrespected so that they can be softened up for dispossession of their worldly goods and finally genocide. They committed the crime of proving they were better than browntown, and for that they must die.

Not often encountering these challenges, we withdraw, defend, cry, argue, minimize, ignore, and in other ways push back to regain our racial position and equilibrium. I term that push back white fragility.

She rejects the concept of legitimate white claims or reactions to her anti-white agenda a priori. That is, she rejects those in theory. Whites are guilty. That is her position. There is nothing they can do or say that will change that. They need to just shut up and do what she says.

This concept came out of my on-going experience leading discussions on race, racism, white privilege and white supremacy with primarily white audiences. It became clear over time that white people have extremely low thresholds for enduring any discomfort associated with challenges to our racial worldviews. We can manage the first round of challenge by ending the discussion through platitudes -- usually something that starts with "People just need to," or "Race doesn't really have any meaning to me," or "Everybody's racist." Scratch any further on that surface, however, and we fall apart.

Blaming whites for things they aren't responsible for while failing to hold blacks accountable for things they are will have that effect on normal people, especially when you don't allow a second side to your 'discussion' which is actually a monologue.

Socialized into a deeply internalized sense of superiority garbage, they are merely using their sense organs to see that whites look, smell, act better than blacks and browns. diangelo, again, denies, implicitly, a priori the possibility of legitimate white superiority pretty much across the board. but that's the case, no matter which measure you want to use. and entitlement that we are either not consciously aware of or can never admit to ourselves, we become highly fragile in conversations about race. Yeah, people are really fragile when you harangue them in a tendentious monologue you've mislabeled a discussion. And the subject of your jeremiad is why whites are an evil destructive race which needs to disappear. We experience a challenge to our racial worldview as a challenge to our very identities as good, moral people. It also challenges our sense of rightful place in the hierarchy. Thus, we perceive any attempt to connect us to the system of racism as a very unsettling and unfair moral offense. They correctly perceive that as there's nothing you can point to in white behavior that is blameworthy, you are going to make things up in order to take something from them, both intangible things like self-respect, but also money and opportunities. And they know that, unlike lying you, your anti-white attacks are backed by the system and its legal authorities.

The following patterns make it difficult for white people to understand racism as a system and lead to the dynamics of white fragility. While they do not apply to every white person, they are well-documented overall:

Segregation: Most whites live, grow, play, learn, love, work and die primarily in social and geographic racial segregation. Yet, our society does not teach us to see this as a loss. Is it a loss? Most whites marry whites. Whites who move are likelier to move to whiter areas, reflecting their preferences. Why are you denying the validity of white existence as whites in a white world? Why are you so bent on destroying whites' comfort in their own white society? Why do you consider white behavior and preferences as inherently invalid? Who says forced association and mongrelization are good things? Pause for a moment and consider the magnitude of this message: We lose nothing of value by having no cross-racial relationships. Pause for a moment and consider the magnitude of this message: nothing is lost when people of failure invade a white area. All white experience shows something very great is lost, since whites move out wherever the presence of blacks and browns becomes too strong. Those feelings and decisions must be invalid, since this "expert" doesn't even consider them. And we know what should would say if she did. Why is the white preference inherently invalid but the non-white preference inherently valid? The entire record of muds expanding from big cities to suburbs is the destruction of those suburbs, the loss of civility, standards, the decline in property values. All related to race, 100%. But goes entirely unmentioned by this woman. White preferences are inherently invalid. White experiences with blacks and browns don't matter and must not be taken into account. Only the 'minority' POV is valid and should be respected. In fact, the whiter our schools and neighborhoods are, the more likely they are to be seen as "good." No, the more likely they are to be good. Which results in their being perceived as good. Again - this woman denies white superiority a priori. Wherever whites may seem to be superior, it's just that. A racist trick! Not sure how it's carried off, since the media are uniformly owned by jews and anti-white in their treatment of these things, but we'll leave it as an inexplicable mystery. The obvious truth, the hypothesis that satisfies Occam's razor, is that whites simply are superior. As individuals. And in the kinds of neighborhoods and cities they create. People of pigeon are drawn to their areas because they are obviously much better than the ones the pigeon people can create for themselves. The implicit message is that there is no inherent value in the presence or perspectives of people of Color. This is an example of the relentless messages of white superiority that circulate all around us, shaping our identities and worldviews. Where is it circulating? In the media that hide the race of black and brown criminals, and go out of their way to denounce white racism literally every day of the year? DiAngelo's explanations dissatisfy Mr Occam. She always takes the opposite approach: looks for the most convoluted explanation that explains the given facts. Whites are manifestly superior - and colored behavior, which we are supposed to respect, right?, shows that: if whites are evil haters and racists, why do people of pigeon continually flood their areas? If whites are terrible, shouldn't the pigeon races be trying to escape that? I mean, don't people try to escape terrible things, rather than hang out with them? It is a sign of how far gone our civilization is that people like DiAngelo rise to public prominence pushing irrational, bigoted nonsense like she is.

The Good/Bad Binary: The most effective adaptation of racism over time is the idea that racism is conscious bias held by mean people. If we are not aware of having negative thoughts about people of color, don't tell racist jokes, are nice people, and even have friends of color, then we cannot be racist. Thus, a person is either racist or not racist; if a person is racist, that person is bad; if a person is not racist, that person is good. Although racism does of course occur in individual acts, these acts are part of a larger system that we all participate in. The focus on individual incidences prevents the analysis that is necessary in order to challenge this larger system. The good/bad binary is the fundamental misunderstanding driving white defensiveness about being connected to racism. We simply do not understand how socialization and implicit bias work. You can't even name one open racist in government. I mean, you can't name one pro-white racist. Plenty of anti-white racists. Your claims of system bias don't hold water for anyone who reads the news. How many trillions of dollars extracted from white taxpayers have been funnelled to people of pigeon? Whites literally have years of their lives devoted to subsidizing the pigeon people we are told are the victims of this system. It is a foul joke.

Individualism: Whites are taught to see themselves as individuals, rather than as part of a racial group. Individualism enables us to deny that racism is structured into the fabric of society. The USA was 90% white until 1960. This means there can be no difference between whiteness and the society it builds and racism. Which implies, since racism is 'bad,' that whites themselves are bad, and inherently build bad societies. But the problem is with the person who hates whites. Not whites themselves. This erases our history and hides the way in which wealth has accumulated over generations and benefits us, as a group, today. It also allows us to distance ourselves from the history and actions of our group. Thus we get very irate when we are "accused" of racism, because as individuals, we are "different" from other white people and expect to be seen as such; we find intolerable any suggestion that our behavior or perspectives are typical of our group as a whole. Back to the old blacks thought up and built everything, but whites stole it from them thru slavery and redlining. This is simply history-flavored trolling.

Entitlement to racial comfort: In the dominant position, whites are almost always racially comfortable and thus have developed unchallenged expectations to remain so. Well, god forbid whites be comfortable in a land they build, like beavers or rabbits or any other animal. What a horrible idea. Whites build something nice and be comfortable in their nest. She wants whites to be uncomfortable as the mud-crowd is, and to justify her hate, she concocts bogus historical explanations to account for white success and black failure. The jewish-communist term 'racism' will of course feature prominently. The same jews who created the anti-white concept of racism also created the concept of communism, which led to the murder of tens of millions of innocent white men in the 20th century. That systemic prejudice couldn't possibility be linked to the agenda behind 'diversity' and 'multiculturalism' and such, now, could it? I mean, just because the same jewish bloodlines are promoting it? (Along with people of failure and white mals [short for malocclusives] like DiAngelo, assuming she is white.)

We have not had to build tolerance for racial discomfort and thus when racial discomfort arises, whites typically respond as if something is "wrong," and blame the person or event that triggered the discomfort (usually a person of color). This blame results in a socially-sanctioned array of responses towards the perceived source of the discomfort, including: penalization; retaliation; isolation and refusal to continue engagement. Since racism is necessarily uncomfortable in that it is oppressive, white insistence on racial comfort guarantees racism will not be faced except in the most superficial of ways.

How would you feel if I blamed you, DiAngelo, for the drastic decline in the honeybee population? You'd be all, that had nothing to do with me. So it is with whites and nons. Whites have nothing to do with the failure of people of pigeon. They need to take responsibility for their failures - or not. But at the least, they need to get off whitey's EBT train and go back to the shitholes they created for themselves.

Racial Arrogance: Most whites have a very limited understanding of racism because we have not been trained to think in complex ways about it and because it benefits white dominance not to do so. Yeah, if there's one thing no white ever hears about, certainly not every minute of every day of his life, it's racism. It's totally not like the media don't spend every single session blaming white attitudes for black behavior. If blacks riot, white racism is the reason. Blacks are basically controlled as via voodoo doll by white behavior. Which of course is the reverse of the truth: white attitudes are a response -- always -- to proven patterns of black behavior. Yet, we have no compunction about debating the knowledge of people who have thought complexly about race. Whites generally feel free to dismiss these informed perspectives rather than have the humility to acknowledge that they are unfamiliar, reflect on them further, or seek more information.

Racial Belonging: White people enjoy a deeply internalized, largely unconscious sense of racial belonging in U.S. society. In virtually any situation or image deemed valuable in dominant society, whites belong. The interruption of racial belonging is rare and thus destabilizing and frightening to whites and usually avoided. How terrible it is, the thought that even one white, anywhere, should feel comfortable and unhated and at peace. We must change this.

Psychic freedom: Because race is constructed as residing in people of color, whites don't bear the social burden of race. We move easily through our society without a sense of ourselves as racialized. Yeah, well the key there is it's our society. Not theirs. We didn't vote to open borders. Your judge pals did. And you prate about the system favoring us! You lie. Race is for people of color to think about -- it is what happens to "them" -- they can bring it up if it is an issue for them (although if they do, we can dismiss it as a personal problem, the race card, or the reason for their problems). Most of them came here of their own free will - and against ours. Apparently they prefer living among racist whites to nigger normal in Nigeria. Apparently whites have some positive qualities that outweigh this mysterious, ghostly 'racism' you speak of with such religious fervor. This allows whites much more psychological energy to devote to other issues and prevents us from developing the stamina to sustain attention on an issue as charged and uncomfortable as race. We have our own problems, and they are on rather a higher level than bushmen from Africa. Why should we lower ourselves to their concerns? They already freeride off our society, indeed most of them would not even be alive were it not for our science and techology. These facts don't go away because you anti-white genocidalists obscure them.

Constant messages that we are more valuable: Living in a white dominant context, we receive constant messages that we are better and more important than people of color. Not through the media we don't. All we ever hear is about the glory of diversity and the horror of racism. For example: our centrality in history textbooks, historical representations and perspectives; our centrality in media and advertising; our teachers, role-models, heroes and heroines; everyday discourse on "good" neighborhoods and schools and who is in them; popular TV shows centered around friendship circles that are all white; religious iconography that depicts God, Adam and Eve, and other key figures as white. While one may explicitly reject the notion that one is inherently better than another, one cannot avoid internalizing the message of white superiority, as it is ubiquitous in mainstream culture. Whites are consistently pictured as evil racists on the wrong side of history in these forums, and colored achievements are presented wildly out of proportion to their actual size. Real white achievement is denigrated or simply ignored in order to promote sub-mediocrities because they are colored. It has been this way for decades. As for superiority, why don't you take on that question directly, since you're so interested in it. Find some measures of it, then find ones where whites _aren't_ objectively superior. Everybody thinks whites are superior because they are. You know it. You're fronting, as your coon heroes say. We proud whites call your bluff.

These privileges and the white fragility that results prevent us from listening to or comprehending the perspectives of people of color and bridging cross-racial divides. The antidote to white fragility is on-going and life-long, and includes sustained engagement, humility, and education. We can begin by:

Being willing to tolerate the discomfort associated with an honest appraisal and discussion of our internalized superiority and racial privilege.

Challenging our own racial reality by acknowledging ourselves as racial beings with a particular and limited perspective on race.

Attempting to understand the racial realities of people of color through authentic interaction rather than through the media or unequal relationships.

Taking action to address our own racism, the racism of other whites, and the racism embedded in our institutions -- e.g., get educated and act.

Why should we agree to have your colored landfill deposited on our front lawns, our workspaces, and in our souls? Why should we allow our superior race to be trashed by people of failure and their hate-filled apologists. We don't need blacks. We don't need browns. But they sure seem to need us. If whites are so terrible, then the most obvious solution is to let the races go their own ways. But you don't support that. For one, it would put anti-white liars like you out of a job. For two, it would show that your arguments are wrong. The all-white state would succeed, even if placed in the worst geography on earth, while the black/brown would fail, even if given the optimal terrain. What's more, I assert you are well aware of this, and the proof is you won't allow racial separation, not into two states, not even into two cities. Because it will show all your fine words to be lies. You are simply a racial traitor, a sellout making a career out of abusing whites and lying about them, torturing them and attempting to bring about their genocide. You know what you deserve, DiAngelo? . . . You do, don't you

"Getting it" when it comes to race and racism challenges our very identities as good white people. It's an ongoing and often painful process of seeking to uncover our socialization at its very roots. It asks us to rebuild this identity in new and often uncomfortable ways. But I can testify that it is also the most exciting, powerful, intellectually stimulating and emotionally fulfilling journey I have ever undertaken. It has impacted every aspect of my life -- personal and professional. Translation: Hating whites is trendy and profitable. The way to be safe from charges of racism is to make them first and loudest.

I have a much deeper and more complex understanding of how society works. I can challenge much more racism in my daily life, and I have developed cherished and fulfilling cross-racial friendships I did not have before.

I do not expect racism to end in my lifetime, and I know that I continue to have problematic racist patterns and perspectives. Yet, I am also confident that I do less harm to people of color than I used to. This is not a minor point of growth, for it impacts my lived experience and that of the people of color who interact with me. If you are white I urge you to take the first step -- let go of your racial certitude and reach for humility. Your humility is false, your chutzpah is real. You profit off spreading hate. You are contemptible.

--

By Dr. Robin DiAngelo, associate professor of critical multicultural and social justice education at Westfield State University.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/good-m...b_7183710.html

Last edited by Alex Linder; May 1st, 2015 at 09:50 PM.
 
Old May 7th, 2015 #10
Alex Linder
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 45,373
Blog Entries: 34
Alex Linder
Default

The murder of Jayde Panayiotou and the manipulating liberal media

By Mike Smith

4th of May 2015

Two weeks ago the beloved teacher from Port Elizabeth’s Riebeek College Girl’s High School, Jayde Panayiotou, was abducted outside her home at Stellen Glen residential complex in Deacon Road, Kabega, brutally murdered and her body found in the Uitenhage township of KwaNobuhle.

Readers of this blog will by now have noticed that I said absolutely nothing about it at the time. Reason being…When it came to the way the media handled the murder, I could smell a rat a mile away.

Every day there are white people brutally murdered by blacks in South Africa. Farmers are the most vulnerable, but most of the time the sheer brutality and lengthy torture of the victims, often with nothing stolen, tell us that the motive is not robbery, but something else.

Problem is that the media NEVER makes such a big noise about these murders.

There is no doubt that Jayde Panayiotou was a beautiful person. She was much loved, but in the bigger scheme of things, the question has to be asked, “What made her case so special to the media?”

The media knew right from the start that there were speculations about her murder. They knew who the real perpetrator (her husband) was, that is why they played the sheeple like a cheap fiddle and the public like a bunch of fools all fell for it.

They published the picture of the black suspect taken at the ATM where he withdrew money from her bank account. Something they never do.

Usually, when it comes to black on white violence, the media goes out of its way to hide the race of the victim/s and the perpetrator/s. In this case they had no qualms to repeatedly publish pictures of the victim and the suspect. By me the alarm bells went off.

Then came the highly publicized marches after her murder, the highly publicized funeral, and her husband’s moving tribute at her funeral …that he incidently googled and stole from Charles Atkins who wrote it in 2010 …

Like I said, “What made her so special?”

When three year old Willemientjie Potgieter was picked up by her red hair by one of the savages and shot in the back of her head, the media hardly mentioned it.

Nevertheless, In the Jayde case, people were angry. Comments on News24 and IOL quickly degenerated into racial accusations and stereotyping, but the most amazing thing was that the comment sections were not blocked. It was thrown open.

Normally when these black savages murder an old white couple or so, the comments sections are closed to prevent exactly these so called “racists” remarks. Why were they, what appears without censoring, almost all allowed in the Jayde case?

And just as the “racist” comments reached fever pitch online, they broke the news that Jayde’s husband, Christopher was arrested for planning her murder all along. Behind it all was a devious white male who had an extramarital affair and who contracted black killers to the price of R80,000 to murder his wife.

Why did the media do it?

The media never lets a chance go by to vilify white males and this was again such a chance. Further, the public should hang their heads in shame for being such evil “racists”; for leaving such dirty, racist comments online. Like naughty school children they were chastised, made to wash their mouths with soap and sent to go and stand in the corner by teacher Media with her rod of morality in her hand.

The media loves stupid sheeple. It sells papers.

On the other hand, the media can only fool those who do not know or understand the agenda.

http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary...iotou-and.html
 
Reply

Tags
#1

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:08 PM.
Page generated in 0.15078 seconds.