|
April 7th, 2013 | #41 |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Yes, pressured by me. I pointed out the hypocrisy of fascists trying to disparage my ethnic group as unintelligent while being afraid to let me debate them without restriction.
|
April 7th, 2013 | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,414
|
That sounds more like an 'appeal to reason' than pressure.
|
April 7th, 2013 | #43 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
For the record, I don't consider all beaners "unintelligent". Hell, I don't even consider them unintelligent in general. That is not my issue with beaners, and never has been. In fact, I actually respect the work ethic (as a whole) your people have (traditionally) as well as family values (traditionally). I will say that the younger generations of beaners are shitheads, but no more so than the younger generation of whites, niggers, or chinks. Multi-culturalism is bad for ALL the races, as it erases racial identity and heritage. Unfortunately, the younger generations have bought into the lie to the detriment of all. Fuck jews, and their lies. I just wish that you would admit it, for in there, we could actually find common ground. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #44 |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Stupid hillbilly, no one is talking to you, least of all me, after your attempts to act as a government informant.
|
April 7th, 2013 | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Oh well, not everyone is principled. Oh well.
|
April 7th, 2013 | #46 |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
You're the least principled, snitch, trying to inform on members by reporting lies to military authorities. You're a government informant who tries to silence opponents through false reporting. You're not just a fascist, but a hypocritical fascist.
|
April 7th, 2013 | #47 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
You really do get pretty paranoid. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #48 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
I consider him a friend of mine, have made no bones about it here and there are very few in that category in WNist circles. Considering the opinions of SF on this forum, surely no one will misconstrue my statement as name dropping by any stretch of the imagination. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #49 |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
I'm flattered.
However, your fellow fascists repeatedly emphasize the unintelligence of Mexican and Central American immigrants as well as U.S. Indians. |
April 7th, 2013 | #50 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
You may want to re-word or edit that, shitskin. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #51 | ||
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
April 7th, 2013 | #52 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
Prove it. I never used your name, your user name, your avatar, your signature block, your ethnicity, your race, or any of the specific things that you have said. Merely inquiring if a member of the USMC posting as a full member of an officially designated "Hate" site (by the SPLC and ADL) would be against the UCMJ, Article 134, is NOT snitching *you* out in any way, shape, or form. Get your facts straight, private. You just made a serious accusation against me, based on your own lies and/or misconception of what actually transpired. Retract or prove that I informed the USMC of "N.M. Valdez" posting on VNNF, and was somehow compensated by the "Government" for my actions as a snitch and/or informant. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #53 | ||
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
Quote:
The reference to "Leavenworth" is an insinuation that I will be incarcerated in a federal prison as a result of this snitching. Who said that an informant has to be compensated by the government to be an informant? |
||
April 7th, 2013 | #54 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
|
April 7th, 2013 | #55 |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Oh, wow. No, while libertarianism is European in origin, that's where the similarities with fascism end. Libertarians were originally anarchist radicals in the nineteenth century, with the word "libertarian" first recorded as being used in a political context by the French anarchist Joseph Dejacque. You couldn't be any closer to authoritarian. And regardless of whatever kind of label you want to use, you're dodging the question of why you won't post a thread about me being unbanned. |
April 7th, 2013 | #56 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
I posed a theoretical (on my part) situation to a JAG officer. The result was, "Stop talking or I will have to investigate" for violations of the UCMJ. How is that "snitching" or "informing" the government on *you* in any way, shape, or form, shitskin? Answer: It isn't. You have made a completely inflammatory and untrue allegation against me, and I want you to retract it by editing your posts. I never informed anything, merely inquired about the legality under your governing law (UCMJ) for a completely fictional member of the UCMJ, without EVER implicating you in any way, shape, or form. In other words, I asked a question, and got an answer straight from the horses mouth. Consider it a "Wiki" answer from the subject matter experts. You don't like that answer.....fuck off, not my problem. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #57 | |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
If I called up the FBI and asked a "hypothetical" question about a member of VNN Forum's plot to firebomb a Jewish synagogue, I wouldn't squeal with anger and demand a retraction if someone called me a government informant. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #58 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
You do realize that that is as far from authoritarian as you can get... You want me to try to get you reinstated at SF, then you go and say nonsensical stuff like that. /facepalm |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #59 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
|
Quote:
Answer: NO You have made an accusation that I am a Government Snitch and a Government Informant. Prove it, or retract it. Thus far, you haven't proved jack shit. *edit* beyond me inquiring about the legalities of a member of the USMC posting on an officially designated "hate" site (per SPLC and ADL) as a full member - and if that was against Article 134 of the UCMJ. If anything, you should be banned from this site, because what you are doing is actually ILLEGAL and breaking the laws that you are governed by. |
|
April 7th, 2013 | #60 | |
SMASH THE FASH
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,382
|
Quote:
I think the problem with asking you to advocate the reinstatement is your idea that opposing viewpoints should be casually dismissed with "facepalms" rather than debated. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|