|
September 11th, 2009 | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,046
|
This subject has already been critiqued before and no one has ever competently answered to the critique.
Quote:
What's the point of doing genetic tests when you cannot find a population? Every single species biologists have classified through sequencing have had an actual physical population that could be identified, this is a paramount principal which most seem completely ignorant and blind to. If you cannot find a consistently interbreeding stable population within some time frame you have absolutely no basis whatsoever to come to the conclusion that there exists a species (or sub race as you like to say) where you think there is one. At any rate the classical heroes - such as Grant and Guenthar didn't even contribute anything to this field, that is they had nothing unique to give anthropologically. The sub racial idea and "discovery" of the Nord was done by Deniker (Albeit commendably without any ideology) all Guenthar and Grant did was tag on their own opinions and historical outlook, basically they were thinking up a novel background for these sub races by observing Europid history. Comically, this outlook on history was rejected by the Third Reich itself (Which in all had only 5% pure Nords , meaning that this forum has approximately 0.00% Nords ) . In the end the only person worth recognizing for any sort of real work would probably be Deniker as someone who studied haplotype but failed to realize that what he was seeing was diversity . There is no sub race of Drosophilia with white eye color, or red eye color, or brown eye color that is genetic diversity at work if every novel genetic snippet made us a sub race then it would be viable to just say that each individual is his own sub race, if that is so what is the purpose of such a label to begin with? Species is a meaningful, well developed concept, sub race is not. Last edited by psychologicalshock; September 11th, 2009 at 08:30 PM. |
|
September 15th, 2009 | #22 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 67
|
|
September 16th, 2009 | #23 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,091
|
Quote:
The same kind of "debate" could be argued about the Cromagnids, they are afterall the oldest people of Europe and unlike the other tribal subraces they are the ones who have the most Aryanic influence to them. And they are certainly closer to being considered "Aryan" than the mediterranids. It shows as the Irano-Nordid subrace is quite present where the Aryan Kingdom was settled, even though this is proof of remnants from the Aryan presence, of course this type is not "Aryan" since it fell to race-mixing with that of the ones from the non-Aryan variety.
__________________
"The Jews, racially are monsters, flunked hybrids, distraughted, who have to disappear. Everything they fiddle, everything they scheme is cursed." - Céline, 1938 |
|
July 26th, 2010 | #25 | |
Barbarian
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,307
|
Quote:
Cro-Magnon man (White racially and ancestor to all the White sub-ethnicities - and something we have deteriorated from in terms of brain size and physical health) quite likely had the epicanthal eye-folds that people are so determined to associate with Mongol ancestry. It is an adaptation to the cold. During your development as a fetus you go through a stage of having epicanthal eye folds and many children have them for a very short while after birth and then they disappear. Our forms during our fetal development reflect our evolution quite remarkably. RickHolland's (Holland is a common Jewish name) post is what the Jews would like us to believe. I am not saying he is a Jew however as I can't know that. Last edited by Hilda; July 26th, 2010 at 04:42 AM. |
|
July 31st, 2012 | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 3
|
is nord-indid or Indian's from north-western part of India are sub-race of Aryan race....
according to dna studies they have almost 70% r1a1* |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|