|
July 23rd, 2018 | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,938
|
Nick Griffin Treasonous, Traitorous, Twat
This thread is to examine the treasonous and traitorous actions of Nick Griffin. Any and all information on this twat greatly appreciative. The man who destroyed both the National Front AND the British National Party. Let this thread be a court of public opinion of his guilt or indeed innocence.
Who is the real Nick Griffin? |
July 24th, 2018 | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 431
|
Quote:
Why bother? He is gone never to be taken seriously again. |
|
July 25th, 2018 | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,938
|
That’s true enough, but this cunt hovers around the periphery of nationalist political life like a cancer, with his associations in Europe. The man has no shame, he’s buddied up once again with money man Jim Dowson. Griffin has destroyed two premier nationalist political parties, yet naive people still lend an ear to this foghorn leghorn.
|
July 25th, 2018 | #4 |
Bread and Circuses
|
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. Last edited by RickHolland; July 25th, 2018 at 04:37 AM. |
July 28th, 2018 | #5 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
I'd like to know why this 'movement' is so strange and odd. In the context of Britain (which is really all I care about), the salient questions are as follows: Why did mainstream Nationalists in Britain run away from electoral politics in 2010, like cats leaping from a hot plate? What happened exactly? Who was behind this decision? Why is there no serious electoral Nationalism now, even just at local government level? Who was behind the relentless internal castigation of Griffin and the leadership from about 2008 onward when it became clear there would be a major national breakthrough? The collapse of the BNP can be traced back directly to the 2008 European election victories. Who was working to bring the BNP down from within and why? Why wasn't Griffin better-prepared for the Question Time programme, and why wasn't there negotiation with the BBC about the general tenor of the questions and the make-up of the panel and the audience? Why did the BNP agree to London as the location? Why not wait until the programme was filmed from a provincial town in a demographically-white part of the country, where a more balanced audience could be justifiable? Who was negotiating with the BBC for the BNP and with whom within the Party were their decisions ratified? Why didn't the BNP consider hiring a private PR consultancy to assist and liaise with the BBC? What was the story behind the confrontation in Brussels between party activists and the leadership? What exactly had Griffin done wrong in the view of the complainants? Where is Simon Darby? He was (unofficially) the Party's deputy leader, he had a high profile in the media, and he was a prominent election candidate. Why has he just disappeared? Why haven't known touts and informants who have provably worked for TV companies in setting-up and ridiculing Nationalists been punished for their betrayal? We are not organising a nice tea party. We should be feared, including by ordinary white people, just as Sinn Fein/IRA were. Why are these people just allowed to walk away without consequences? |
|
July 28th, 2018 | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
Well we all saw what happened next. |
|
July 28th, 2018 | #7 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
You don't engage the media on their terms, at least not entirely. A five year old knows that. Look at what George Galloway does when he is messed around by the media. He doesn't put up with it and makes a scene. If what you have been told is correct as to what happened, then something's amiss. Either Griffin's judgement was clouded at the time - perhaps his vanity got in the way - or there's a more sinister explanation. |
|
July 28th, 2018 | #8 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
Question Time was broadcast on the 22 October 2009 and sounded like this... From six minutes into the video above on into the video below the groveling and nigger fawning Griffin throws his 'pal' David Duke under the bus. Also, listen closely as the Jew, Jack Straw, traps Griffin on this new BNP policy of apologia @ 1:10 in the video above. Three weeks later (14 November 2009) Griffin's self-imposed humiliation had bought him interviews like this... You'll note that's a cold and hostile interview, but there's no longer any mention of the Holocaust or David Duke and the KKK. Last edited by Henry.; July 28th, 2018 at 08:11 PM. |
|
July 29th, 2018 | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 113
|
Excellent, thanks, I've repped you.
Right, so basically it was an agreed approach. Unfortunately, that does circle back to the same question: was it merely a misjudgement or was the enemy hand at work in some way? Let's start with the man at the top, as that's what this thread is about. Personally, I'm inclined not to believe Griffin is/was on the pay roll. Part of the reason for this is that normally it's disadvantageous for the state and enemy to have an agent at the very top, especially as the titular head of a party or group. If you stop and think about it, if you needed to infiltrate the BNP and ruin it, you'd be pretty dumb to have the leader working for you. I'm not saying leaders are above suspicion and never become agents - clearly occasionally they do - and I'm not ruling out that Griffin could be an agent, but I'm inclined to think he was not. The disadvantages of a leader-as-agent are: (i). A leader doesn't have much intelligence to pass on. He's not actually 'running' things in the sense of administration and what not, which is really the function that the enemy needs to infiltrate to have a long-term detrimental effect on things. (ii). The leader is prominent, so anything he does wrong-deliberately-accidentally-on-purpose will be noticed straight-away. This limits his effectiveness. He can be deposed, forced to resign, or people can just walk away. [c.f. I realise the latter could be the basis of a counter-argument]. (iii). Leaders are normally 'up and out', by which I mean once you become leader, you're only going one way, which is out the door, whereas somebody at a more junior level may embed themselves into the organisation over a much longer period of time and thus be more effective as an agent. You may say that Griffin was there to steer the ship onto the rocks and was playing a 'long game' in that regard, and I admit that's possible, but I'm sceptical about it. I've read what Tyndall said about him, but Griffin was manifestly trying to make the BNP a success. I have a more likely scenario in my head, which I will probably come back and add at a later point. But the above will do for now. |
July 29th, 2018 | #10 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,629
|
Quote:
"Dumb" to have the leader working for you? Nonsense. In a "Party" like the BNP, as it was back then, it made perfect sense. The A/C ran everything and knew all the main activists in the party. The BNP wasn't a huge network of dedicated men and women, there was a small number of people working there arses off and lots of supporters willing to part with their hard earned coin. Wasn't hard to push policy where the folks at the top wanted it to go. IMO. |
|
July 29th, 2018 | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 848
|
Quote:
And yet even JT was taken in! |
|
July 29th, 2018 | #12 | ||
Bread and Circuses
|
Quote:
Quote:
This is supposed to be his best intervention and the peak of his career. Now compare him with a guy that is ideologically less extreme than Griffin but compensates it with an alpha male character, a strong voice and presence, and it makes the other candidates look like soy boys near him and like Galloway can counter-attack without sounding like a wuss. Farage and Galloways have some fight in them they are revolutionary because they can effectivelly throw blows and hurt the system. This is supposed to be Farage best intervention and the peak of his career. Look to the reaction of his political enemies and how they screech. Now compare it to their reaction or lack of it in the video above. Just the terms racist/xenophobic defeats Griffin.
__________________
Only force rules. Force is the first law - Adolf H. http://erectuswalksamongst.us/ http://tinyurl.com/cglnpdj Man has become great through struggle - Adolf H. http://tinyurl.com/mo92r4z Strength lies not in defense but in attack - Adolf H. Last edited by RickHolland; July 29th, 2018 at 02:03 PM. |
||
July 29th, 2018 | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 431
|
Owens loves Griffin. What more is there to say?
|
July 29th, 2018 | #14 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
|
|
July 29th, 2018 | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Who remembers this ambush? It took place immediately after Griffin had taken part in his own murder on Question Time?
|
July 29th, 2018 | #16 |
'God Belief, German Piety'
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,913
|
There's always the possibility Griffin was recruited at Cambridge by MI5, and I have sometimes considered this, but then Griffin did take over the BNP when it was going nowhere and transformed it into an electable party.
Griffin is clearly a flawed character where the lure of money is concerned. As soon as the BNP started to take off, he put close family members on the BNP payroll. 'Pin money' he called it as he gave his mother a job as secretary answering enquiries from the public. I know from my own experience working for Griffin producing leaflets, he offered me money, £30 a leaflet, and I said no despite being unemployed, because I was involved because I believe in the cause and not to earn money out of it. I then said, when my laser toner runs dry, you could buy me another one. Deal! Griffin said. He then rather contemptuously said they (members donations) will pay for it. That left a bit of a red flag in my mind and a few years down the line it became clear Griffin was in it for the money first, and the cause second. Last edited by Gerry Fable; July 30th, 2018 at 04:36 AM. |
July 30th, 2018 | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Strange bedfellows. We're still waiting for a plausible explanation as to how Owens was able to pass under police radar as Griffin's bodyguard/driver without legal documentation, i.e., no driving licence or insurance.
|
July 30th, 2018 | #18 |
'God Belief, German Piety'
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,913
|
Paul Golding speaks of the impending crisis.
https://establishmentwatch.wordpress...ending-crisis/ Golding's take on the dodgy dealings of the BNP leadership. While completely exonerating himself of any blame. |
July 30th, 2018 | #19 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
August 1st, 2018 | #20 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 848
|
Quote:
I disagree! Gri££in destroyed the BNP, and who said it was "going nowhere" prior to his coup? IF the Gri££inite BNP was ever "electable", it was only as a SLIGHTLY MORE "right wing" alternative to the multicult UKIP, so, NOTHING in that proposition for pro-Whites! |
|
Tags |
cunt, nick griffin, scumbag, twat |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|