Eric Thomson: An Aryan Overview of Religion, in Theory & Practice

[Lars Redoubt]

An Aryan Overview of Religion, in Theory & Practice

by E. Thomson

The Word in Writing
Major religions have their ‘holy books’ which their alleged adherents cite in justification or condemnation of certain practices. It is revealing that NO religious leader or promoter is content merely to hand out copies of his religious ‘holy book’, even if the words are alleged to be from his respective god or gods (including goddesses). Buddhists have their ‘holy scriptures’, although Buddha is not a god, so their priests also cite such texts as bases for their lessons. As lawyers know, written words are always subject to interpretations. In Europe, lawyers (often pronounced “liars”) were derived from priests, monks & other clergy. In Dark Age (Age of Filth & Faith) England, if an accused could claim to read from a sacred text, his status would be elevated from ‘common criminal’ to ‘a member of the clergy’, which included certain privileges in courts of law, in those times. Hence, crooks would learn the words to the usual passage by rote & pretend to read the words, which they had really memorized, since they could not read at all! This trick usually worked in courts, since courtroom personnel were most often illiterate themselves! Many of them also pretended to read, so it was an example of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” in daily practice: a conspiracy of hypocrisy. Writing & the ability to read it have been considered signs of great status. In China, if an illiterate peasant found a scrap of paper upon which anything resembling writing appeared, he was ordered, under pain of death, to hand that piece of paper to his local Mandarin (who could read!) for study & evaluation. I read that villages had their ‘postal box’ for depositing such pieces of paper, for subsequent collection by the Mandarins’ minions.

Such societies often had a social hierarchy based on writing ability. China’s would be, from bottom up, peasants, postmen & Mandarins. Israel’s would be scribes, pharisees & hypocrites; England’s would be toilers, liars & friars, &c. Written words themselves had magical & religious significance, as did numbers & symbols. Thus it is that “clerical” refers equally to writing & to religious promotion, as “clerk” relates to “cleric.”

Much was achieved, mainly for mischief, when a “god’s word” was put into writing! It opened a Pandora’s Box full of possibilities for pernicious prose, errors of omission, errors of commission, mistranslations & misspellings. Most readers have heard of the printer’s error of spelling ”coronel” as “colonel” in English. Instead of the printer spanking his devil, the word was multiplied so much that the error became the “correct” spelling in English! I understand that similar errors of text occurred in “incanabula,” which I was told meant texts inscribed in books before the invention of printing. It is possible that monkeries copied ‘sacred’ texts by means of monks who were good at drawing the letters, but who may not have been able to read the texts which they were supposed to copy. Fortunately, we do not seem to be currently inundated by incanabula requiring proofreading, as we are by printed texts! Thus it is, that the more something is written, the greater the chance for intentional & accidental errors. Imagine an infinite number of monkeys with an infinite number of typewriters!

It is no wonder that the Catholic Church forbade translations of its ‘holy book’, for when it finally did become available to ‘unapproved’ readers, it sparked all sorts of heresies, schisms & bloody ‘holy wars’. Even when the words of a text are the same, two readers may derive two opposing interpretations of what they have read. A hundred readers may derive 100 different meanings, or more, depending on their understanding of the words, & to which words they give emphasis. Religious texts are like the proverbial wife of Caesar: “all things to all men.” Words take on meaning from the reader or listener. Recently, a crowd of Mexicans confronted a crowd of Gringos in Texas. As I heard, both groups were shouting, “Remember the Alamo!” at one another. For Gringos, the words mean fighting Mexicans. For Mexicans, the words mean, “Kill Gringos!” Meaning resides in the mind of the beholder.

The Spoken Word
Religions evolve or devolve when speakers voice their interpretations of the written texts, & of texts written to ‘interpret’ the original texts. It has been noted that Australia was where the British sent their common criminals, & America was where they sent their religious nuts. If one drops a bible in America, someone will likely pick it up & start a new church, based on the first page he reads. The Black Muslims have done this with the words of The Koran, which they interpret to please themselves, just as Black “Israelites” consider themselves to be the “true jews”. One local Black preacher assured me that King Solomon had kinky hair, revealing his Black heritage, as he read in HIS bible. At last count, I know of several versions of “The Bible”: King James the Pervert; The Catholic Douay version, The New Revised Standard version, funded by kosher-commie-capitalist bankster, Jakob Schiff; & a “Scofield Bible”, which is apparently the basis for another definition of “Israelite.” Then we should be aware of “The Geneva Bible”, & bibles translated into other languages, &c. Although “The Bible” of whatever version is allegedly the basis for the Christians’ religions, it includes the Old Testament, which is anything but Christian! This is like combining Yahweh & Satan into a single deity. The Mormons, pronounced “Morons”, have composed their very own book, allegedly from an “angel” fittingly named “Moroni.” Once again, we see the connection between religious leaders or conspirators & their written texts. This modern pattern identifies how bibles & other ‘holy books’ begin: The human founders of a religion impose their interpretation in the beginning, & those words become interpreted & perverted by other religious leaders, who compose their own texts, for later interpretation; so on & so forth. The written doctrines of a religion may be likened to the words of a song, & the promoters of the doctrine are the ‘singers’ of their ‘song’: emphasizing some of the lyrics & muting the rest, according to their purposes. In religion, the power of the singer is essential to the power of his words. A written text is just as useless, unspoken, as it is on a shelf, unread. One wonders how the Protestant Reformation would have fared had it appeared in pamphlet form, without Martin Luther. The rebellion against the Catholic Church most likely would have been buried, if it had only appeared in writing, without the able rabble-rousers who spoke in its name, & who stirred others to fight. The Catholics also had their ‘singers’, who persuaded their believers to fight. If no ‘singers’ had existed, Luther’s written theses could have been burnt as trash, or the Pope’s indulgences could have fuelled a ‘Bonfire of the Vanities,’ & a Thirty Years’ War avoided! Luther did not write a new bible, but relied on the translation printed by Gutenberg for his song. The Gutenberg Bible was Luther’s lyrics & the totem of his perceived legitimacy as ‘singer’ or religious leader.

The power of the singers is at least on par with their purported lyrics or doctrines which are supposedly derived from their ‘immutable holy books’, as history proves from the U.S. Civil War. Abolitionists who purported to be Christians denounced slavery as “unChristian”, but nowhere have I read anything in The New Testament, nor the Old, which denounces slavery. On the contrary, Jesus’ alleged advice to slaves is to serve their masters loyally. Dr. Oliver reported the discovery in Sardinia of a slave collar which was inscribed that the slave who wore it was the property of the so very Christian Archbishop of Sardinia. Dr. Oliver also concluded that “the good Christianity brought to Europe was not new, & the new was not good.” He added that such crimes as theft were wrong amongst Whites, simply because they were wrong; not because some ancient Hebrew scribe wrote down that they were ‘wrong’ in a ‘holy book’. Nietzsche applauded the inclusion of the jew-book in European culture, because it made Europeans exercise their minds in order to interpret around what was ostensibly forbidden. In other words, it made Whites into ‘lawyers’, much like jews! When Greeks were Aryans, in ancient times, they denounced such use of words as “sophistry”, i.e. immoral abuse of language, as when the letter of the law is misused to defeat the spirit of the law, much as Jesus was said to rebuke the Pharisees for the same thing.

It seems fair to say that excessive reliance on written & spoken words, as opposed to action & experience, leads one toward hypocrisy, in which one can use words to excuse any crime of commission or omission. When one’s god is derived entirely from words purveyed in texts written by men & meanings interpreted by other men, such gods become “all things to all men,” & thus, as fallible as men are, themselves.

A god’s purpose is to serve men who need his wisdom. Men can offer nothing to a being endowed, by definition, with everything! As the French say: “Noblesse oblige”: that the higher one’s rank, the greater his obligations. If we consider how finite men’s gods are, much as we are, as tiny parts of The Universe, we may have the way in which the Gordian Knot of man’s religious verbiage may be severed, so that men may dream better dreams in order to achieve higher planes of religion & therefore of existence, as our destiny demands. It is our privilege & our duty to achieve ORION!

--------------------

Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.

[brutus]

It has been noted that Australia was where the British sent their common criminals, & America was where they sent their religious nuts. If one drops a bible in America, someone will likely pick it up & start a new church, based on the first page he reads.

Good stuff! LOL!

.