Tips for both Courting and Intercourse for Men and Women

[Nigel Thornberry]

Originally Posted by Alyss

So ladies, do you still back him now?

This is proof that he hates women because he can't find love or never been with a woman. A bitter post directed at women because it sounds like he can't get a lady.

Not really, this just is the best way to move forward. Women would be free from men trying to mold them into crude sluts, and men would be free (not to mention the reproductive rights alone) to live a bitch-free existence.

[Breanna]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

Duh.

You really want this futuristic world or you are just trolling? Would you really want to live in a world without families with no human women?

[Nigel Thornberry]

Well, in the interim, there should be freedom of choice.

If I were just coming into maturity, and I had the option to walk an emotional minefield of dating and having my heart broken (or worse, being stripped of my financial freedom by some insipid sow), or financing a fuckbot with a built in artificial womb, there would be no question. I'd opt for a fuckbot.

These robotic women would never complain, or whine, or be emotionally unstable. They'd have programmed suites to nurture and support you, they'd ovulate on command and be able to synthesize a fertile ova, and potentially be able to screen genetic defects and allow you to customize your child's physical and mental attributes. It would be like GATTACA but more efficient.

Artificial wombs are less than a decade away, and will finally strip the glaring disparity between men and women in terms of reproductive rights. You could on your own volition be artificially inseminated, I lack any comparable avenue. In the spirit of equality, I want this.

[Alyss]

Originally Posted by Breanna

You really want this futuristic world or you are just trolling? Would you really want to live in a world without families with no human women?

I guess he has never had sex before. Sex is an amazing feeling and noone will ever pass up sex... Gays, non-whites, jews, animals... No one.

[Alyss]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

Well, in the interim, there should be freedom of choice.

If I were just coming into maturity, and I had the option to walk an emotional minefield of dating and having my heart broken (or worse, being stripped of my financial freedom by some insipid sow), or financing a fuckbot with a built in artificial womb, there would be no question. I'd opt for a fuckbot.

These robotic women would never complain, or whine, or be emotionally unstable. They'd have programmed suites to nurture and support you, they'd ovulate on command and be able to synthesize a fertile ova, and potentially be able to screen genetic defects and allow you to customize your child's physical and mental attributes. It would be like GATTACA but more efficient.

Artificial wombs are less than a decade away, and will finally strip the glaring disparity between men and women in terms of reproductive rights. You could on your own volition be artificially inseminated, I lack any comparable avenue. In the spirit of equality, I want this.

Why do you hate women so much??? Was I right in my post responding to brenna?

Im anti feminist, but i do not hate women. I hate how white men fight jews wars, but i still don't hate white men.

[Breanna]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

Well, in the interim, there should be freedom of choice.

If I were just coming into maturity, and I had the option to walk an emotional minefield of dating and having my heart broken (or worse, being stripped of my financial freedom by some insipid sow), or financing a fuckbot with a built in artificial womb, there would be no question. I'd opt for a fuckbot.

These robotic women would never complain, or whine, or be emotionally unstable. They'd have programmed suites to nurture and support you, they'd ovulate on command and be able to synthesize a fertile ova, and potentially be able to screen genetic defects and allow you to customize your child's physical and mental attributes. It would be like GATTACA but more efficient.

Artificial wombs are less than a decade away, and will finally strip the glaring disparity between men and women in terms of reproductive rights. You could on your own volition be artificially inseminated, I lack any comparable avenue. In the spirit of equality, I want this.

Why go through all this frankenstein stuff? Or we could just return to traditional patriarchal families. That worked just fine for our ancestors for most of history. How could you destroy the mother-infant bond?

Most normal men wouldn't want to get rid of female beauty, or the feeling of a woman's flesh, and replace it with a robot. You watch too much Star Trek.

Your model would not lead to a happy society. Humans could not develop properly without the mother-infant bond. It would likely create a population of autistics (as autism is caused by "refridgerator mothers" I'm sure a complete lack of mothers would be much worse). Look to the past of our ancestors, not the future of social engineers. Do you really believe those scientists are benevolent to our movement? You sound like Elliot Rodgers.

Women should not have the right to choose who to mate and breed with. That decision should be
made for them by rational men of intelligence.
In an ideal world, sexuality would not exist. It must be outlawed.
In a world without sex, humanity will be pure and civilized. Men will grow up healthily, without having to
worry about such a barbaric act. All men will grow up fair and equal, because no man will be able to
experience the pleasures of sex while others are denied it. The human race will evolve to an entirely
new level of civilization, completely devoid of all the impurity and degeneracy that exists today.
A few women would be spared, however, for the sake of reproduction. These women would be kept
and bred in secret labs. There, they will be artificially inseminated with sperm samples in order to
produce offspring. Their depraved nature will slowly be bred out of them in time.
Future generations of men would be oblivious to these remaining women’s existence, and that is for
the best. If a man grows up without knowing of the existence of women, there will be no desire for sex.
Sexuality will completely cease to exist. Love will cease to exist. There will no longer be any imprint of
such concepts in the human psyche. It is the only way to purify the world.”

Without women you'd get a society like a prison where men of higher ranking end up raping men of lower ranking, likely raping teens and youth. You have become so cynical. You would do away with the greatest feelings in life, love and motherhood. These high IQ scientists are usually socially retarded. I wouldn't trust them to be social engineers for a nation. Your scientific futuristic worldview is so nerdy, asiatic, and jewish. Cold, clinical, devoid of life and feeling.

[Zander]

it didn't take long for this thread to go down the shitter.....mind you, that was probably why it was started to begin with,

[Sam Emerson]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

Yeah because clearly that is working so very well for us.

Whites have always had lower fertility than muds. We have a high investment reproductive strategy. Fixing our low birthrates by becoming bastard siring wiggers just creates more problems. We need moral men, not trash.

Your strategy will produce little other than trash.

[Sam Emerson]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

For every PUA faggot, there's 10000 bitches picking up alimony or child support. I don't care for your milksop bullshit about snowflake status for women, they are scum. You can bet every single mom you meet is a complete subhuman parasite. Worse than a Jew. This is why I'm saying you should fuck and forget sluts,

Your revenge on single mothers: Create more.

Great plan, Nigel.

[Nigel Thornberry]

Originally Posted by Breanna

Or we could just return to traditional patriarchal families.

How, exactly, do you suggest we do that?

Marriage today is a financial commitment most men (quite rightly) are not willing to make frivolously. The legal system has put a wedge between men and women. Do you honestly want more men to enter into arrangements that can lead to being in a situation that is costing single fathers $32 billion dollars a year in the US, alone?

I simply don't think it's worth the risk.

Most normal men wouldn't want to get rid of female beauty, or the feeling of a woman's flesh, and replace it with a robot. You watch too much Star Trek.

If that's the case, there is nothing to worry about. I still believe that they should have the option, to see what happens.

Your model would not lead to a happy society.

I guarantee that millions of men are not living in a happy society right now, having to shell over $1k per child per month to some ungrateful bitch who isn't fit to be a mom anyway.

Humans could not develop properly without the mother-infant bond.

I think children suffer more without a father-infant bond.

It would likely create a population of autistics (as autism is caused by "refridgerator mothers" I'm sure a complete lack of mothers would be much worse). Look to the past of our ancestors, not the future of social engineers. Do you really believe those scientists are benevolent to our movement? You sound like Elliot Rodgers.

Argumentum ad metum and simple name calling, I expected a lot more from you.

Without women you'd get a society like a prison where men of higher ranking end up raping men of lower ranking, likely raping teens and youth. You have become so cynical. You would do away with the greatest feelings in life, love and motherhood. These high IQ scientists are usually socially retarded. I wouldn't trust them to be social engineers for a nation. Your scientific futuristic worldview is so nerdy, asiatic, and jewish. Cold, clinical, devoid of life and feeling.

Metum, again, you don't know what would happen. It's not as if women would be purged from earth. Companies would start selling these sex bots, and companies would start offering men the ability to reproduce without women. Ie. reproductive rights. Why do you think women should be the sole bearers of reproductive rights? I can count five or six men off the top of my head that would have opted for this had they the chance.

Originally Posted by Alyss

Why do you hate women so much???

Scum like you bitch and moan about white men, but ask why we treat you like human garbage?

[Alyss]

Nigel needs to take advice on women, or he will die alone.

[Nigel Thornberry]

Originally Posted by Alyss

Nigel needs to take advice on women, or he will die alone.

My face while reading

[Alyss]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

My face while reading

Ok, fair enough....then why did you start this thread then, Moron? Your a virgin that takes it out on women.

[Alyss]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

My face while reading

Oh... I got it now, sorry for not seeing it earlier... Your a fucking virgin poofter! Why didn't you just come out with it earlier?

[Breanna]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

How, exactly, do you suggest we do that?

I don't know. But if our ancestors could do it before, why can't we do it again?

Marriage today is a financial commitment most men (quite rightly) are not willing to make frivolously. The legal system has put a wedge between men and women. Do you honestly want more men to enter into arrangements that can lead to being in a situation that is costing single fathers $32 billion dollars a year in the US, alone?
I simply don't think it's worth the risk.

Why not? Just don't get divorced.

If that's the case, there is nothing to worry about. I still believe that they should have the option, to see what happens.

I guarantee that millions of men are not living in a happy society right now, having to shell over $1k per child per month to some ungrateful bitch who isn't fit to be a mom anyway.

So just don't get divorced.

I think children suffer more without a father-infant bond.

I think so too. They suffer without either. Which is why I uphold the patriarchal traditional family.

Companies would start selling these sex bots, and companies would start offering men the ability to reproduce without women.

But it's so communist. So anti-family and anti-life. It is completely against National Socialism idealization of motherhood and family, they would likely have someone spouting beliefs like that thrown into a concentration camp because it is the product of a twisted mind. It makes me sad how cynical you have become.

Ie. reproductive rights. Why do you think women should be the sole bearers of reproductive rights?

I don't. I don't believe in reproductive rights for anyone. I believe in the old model of sex-family-babies, no birth control, no feminism, with the man as the head of the family as the family patriarch and leader.

I can count five or six men off the top of my head that would have opted for this had they the chance.

Five or six - you act like you are speaking for all men. There are many men who are happy with women, have fun with women and love women. Men who are successful with women don't have problems with women treating them badly, using them, or divorcing them. Men who are successful with women like women because women love them and treat them well. Women don't divorce, use, or take advantage of men they love and are happy with.

[Nigel Thornberry]

Originally Posted by Alyss

Oh... I got it now, sorry for not seeing it earlier... Your a fucking virgin poofter! Why didn't you just come out with it earlier?

Because I'm not a big ol' slut who talks about my sexual life ad nauseum. This forum has enough of those, already.

Originally Posted by Breanna

I don't know. But if our ancestors could do it before, why can't we do it again?

It just seems unworkable in the long term. I have no issues with courting, and I know you don't, but, just like you're pointing the finger at me saying I don't speak for all men, neither do you.

Why not? Just don't get divorced.

Men rarely initiate divorce. Telling me this is ineffective.

I think so too. They suffer without either. Which is why I uphold the patriarchal traditional family.

Well, I did not say not to marry in the OP. I told women to be chaste and men to gain experience. Women who have less than 1 sexual partner before marriage have successful marriages over 50% higher than women who have more than 2, women who have more than 3-4 might as well not get married at all because it is almost destined to end in divorce.

Unless you're a parasite, which goes without saying.

But it's so communist.

Wtf lol.

No, it is capitalism.

Women don't divorce, use, or take advantage of men they love and are happy with.

It's still a risk that I believe men are smart not taking.

[Breanna]

Nigel don't you want to have a happy family with a woman you love, who nurtures your children and loves you?

[Nigel Thornberry]

I'd like to think I'm on that road now, but I speak for the struggling men I see everywhere, and the victims of female dominated jurisprudence. I can lie, but 31+ billion yearly doesn't. I see this as complete extortion of men by women using the most sickening leverage - their own children - to coerce them.

[Breanna]

Originally Posted by Nigel Thornberry

I'd like to think I'm on that road now, but I speak for the struggling men I see everywhere, and the victims of female dominated jurisprudence. I can lie, but 31+ billion yearly doesn't. I see this as complete extortion of men by women using the most sickening leverage - their own children - to coerce them.

I believe so too but it shouldn't make us give up on the family ideal.

[Alyss]

I'd like to think I'm on that road now, but I speak for the struggling men I see everywhere, and the victims of female dominated jurisprudence. I can lie, but 31+ billion yearly doesn't. I see this as complete extortion of men by women using the most sickening leverage - their own children - to coerce them.

End.

Suck it up princess. You men created this shit. Men say men want sex without attachments, (etc.. No marriage, no family, no kids) than calls women sluts and whores. I have no sympathy for males any longer... Differently no sympathy for fucked up cunts like you, Nigel.