|
May 31st, 2004 | #1 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Civil Discussion Of Circumcision
Did you know that Howard Stern is the first -- and still the only -- mega-celebrity to publicly and repeatedly take an appropriately outraged, uncompromising, zero-tolerance stand against the sexual mutilation of children and babies? And he is Jewish!
http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/stern.htm Quote:
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/show...85&postcount=2 Quote:
http://net.indra.com/~shredder/intact/anatomy/ Believe it or not, there are many male high school graduates in America who don't even know what a foreskin is, or that anyone actually has skin covering the head of their penis. |
||
May 31st, 2004 | #2 |
The Clairvoyant
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,883
|
I'm glad that wasn't done to me. My dad wanted it done, but my mom talked him out of it.
I feel a bit sorry for those who have had it done. |
May 31st, 2004 | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Your mother made a wise decision. My guess is that your father wanted it done to you so that you would look like him.
It is absurd that so many parents don't even question it and take their doctor's word as gospel. This picture was drawn by an 11-year old. Who would actually not believe that such an experience as depicted wouldn't be extremely painful and traumatizing? |
May 31st, 2004 | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S.E.PA
Posts: 1,626
|
A couple years ago, the stories about African female genital mutilation made the news. I must admit I was upset that people could do that to their children. Even if they consider it customary. Then it dawned on me that I was feeling sorry for someone else, when I held my own damaged organ daily. No one can feel good about circumcision once you make the connection to genital mutilation.
All so that when lined up against the wall, THEY cannot be distinguished from US easily! |
May 31st, 2004 | #5 | |
The Clairvoyant
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,883
|
Quote:
Of course, since my mom is from another country, this almost lemming like tradition isn't practiced, so she refused. |
|
May 31st, 2004 | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 30
|
Well, it was never a tradition in the USA for non jews until after WW2.
It was part of the jew victim mentality, that wanted jews to be able to blend in more easily. Pre-1950, it was easy enough to pick out a jew in say, a men's locker room or restroom, by his mutilated genitals. The jew doctors decided that all babies in the US would be cut, thus minimalizing the chance that a jew could be picked out later. I gave birth back in the early 70s to my sons, and *insisted* that they not be cut. I had quite an argument from the hospital and their pediatrician, but I stuck by my guns. Thank the gods that the movement to NOT mutilate baby boys has caught on so well in the last decade or so! Circumcision is genital mutilation, no matter how you look at it. |
May 31st, 2004 | #7 | |
The Clairvoyant
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,883
|
Quote:
If that's true, dye me hair and grab me a David Duke bumper sticker. :P |
|
May 31st, 2004 | #8 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 30
|
My source?
Simple observation. Ask non jews born before WW2 if they or men they knew were cut. Very few non jews were cut back then. None of my family's men were ever cut back then, nor anyone they knew, except jews. The only reasons to do it pre War were always religious. The trend started immediately following WW2 during the Baby Boom. The number of jews in the medical profession allowed them to shove the pseudo science ideas that it was somehow "dirty" to keep that part, on the mothers of the huge numbers of babies born then. Moms back then strayed from breastfeeding, and had their babies mutilated, all on the orders of the mainly jewish medical profession. It is not hard to put the pieces together and see why. Coincidence? I think not. |
May 31st, 2004 | #9 | |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
Quote:
I’ve read points of view on both sides. I doubt that it is of too much importance to health and function, but good sense would indicate that the procedure is not needed and should not be done. When was the practice begun, large scale, on non-jews? I don’t know, but my father was born in 1920 and he was circumcised. We are Lowland Scots and Northern English back many generations. Enkidu |
|
May 31st, 2004 | #10 |
The Clairvoyant
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,883
|
I didn't Europeans were circumsized...I thought it was only Americans.
|
May 31st, 2004 | #11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
May 31st, 2004 | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: With my awesome parents
Posts: 7,802
|
Here is a chart showing US circumcision rates. The rate is actually down to 30% in the western states now.
|
May 31st, 2004 | #13 |
Enkidu
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Under the Panopticon.
Posts: 4,297
|
To be clearer, I was born in Texas, my father in Arkansas, my mother in Kansas. Before that, my father’s family is from Ayr in the Lowlands of Scotland, my mother’s family from Yorkshire in the North of England.
Jews are not new to the US or Scotland or England. The doctor at my birth was a jew. My mother’s mother was a seamstrice (sp) and always worked for jews. My father’s mother told me stories of jewish grocers and merchants. Was it Cromwell that did this to us? ---- Palantine Creator, Well done, fast bit of research, good chart. ---- Enkidu |
May 31st, 2004 | #14 |
The Clairvoyant
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,883
|
My dad's 2nd generation German (born in the US), but he was circumsized. I'm pretty sure his grandfather wasn't circumsized, however. I have no idea why it started.
On my mom's side, circumcision is regarded as a barbaric western custom (but the Jews started this, if I am not mistaken) in her country. |
May 31st, 2004 | #15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 1,945
|
Quote:
I'm very surprised it peaked as late as it did. I was born in 1950 in Ohio, my doctor was a displaced Chinese (!) from Taiwan and my circumcision was totally routine. Nobody asked any questions. Either about the circumcision or what the hell a chink DP was doing in rural Ohio when Truman was president. The whole trouble then was nobody asked too many questions at all. I thought the rate started going down just after I was born but it actually seems to have kept climbing for many years. Live and learn. |
|
June 1st, 2004 | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: S.E.PA
Posts: 1,626
|
And they saw masturbation as the cause of mental illness. Probably because all the crazies killed time whacking off. Confused cause and effect. And if all it takes to keep your kid from going insane was to cut some skin off their little peckers, well, off with their hoods!
|
June 1st, 2004 | #17 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Terrible, circumcision is. I hear it makes the penis less sensitive. But hey, if you've had it done to you, no need to hang your head about it. There are more important things to take care of. Just make sure your sons won't have any part of their bodies cut away, and you're fine. And while we're at it, pretty pictures are best kept on paper, instead of burned into White skin. And little pieces of metal is definitely not something that should be stuck in human flesh. It feels good to be free of such things! Clean, you know. |
|
June 1st, 2004 | #18 | |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
Quote:
As for that "English common law is based on Roman law," not so. English common law is in fact the best of the Germanic legal tradition, but by contrast, today's German system is Roman law. The only jurisdictions that practice "common law" today are US, England, and former British possessions though not all. The "Civil Law" is practiced nearly everywhere else including non-White nations like China. Napolean re-established the Justinian code as the standard for law nearly everywhere outside of England. Napoleon was a mixed bag, in some ways subversive in some ways not. Anyhow Jarl, the NS was referring to Napoleonic Code based "Civil Law" against which the Anglo-American common law is the more "Germanic" tradition, sans doute. LOL Finally, one of the ironies of Hitler was that he centralized the German state in a very Roman-Napoleonic fashion and abrogated the independence of the Lander, which in America and Germany is a system of balance between local and central government known as federalism. So Hitler sold Germanism, but delivered Caesarism, in terms of politics. I dont blame him for this, it was quite necessary to stamp out reaction along with Marxism, but them's the facts dude. Last edited by Antiochus Epiphanes; June 1st, 2004 at 08:14 PM. |
|
June 1st, 2004 | #19 | |
Doubts the official story
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Pineywoods
Posts: 4,974
|
Damnable Kikes!
I've been avoiding this thread because the subject pisses me off so much. I was born in TX in the same era and didn't discover til awareness years later that the kindly old family doctor was a damned jew. I got even angrier to read that article the other day that explained the the 'total cut' they do today has only been around for a few hundred years. Originally they just snipped off the tip, leaving a significent amount of protective mucous-membrane intact. Young jews were attempting to hide the mutilation by tugging that shred down. So some stinking mohel 'invented" the full removal of all the prepuce, complete mutilation and exposure of the glans to the desensitizing effect of exposure.
I asked my niece (a nurse) why the hell she did it to her little boy. Sanitary reasons! Hell, anybody can wash their dick. She didn't even know the damned thing was meant to be a mucous organ. Primitive pervert mohels suck the blood from the freshly cut yidlet's willie. Damned Jews, ____ them all! (Trying to be civil here, did a lil edit.) Quote:
Last edited by MOMUS; June 1st, 2004 at 08:35 PM. |
|
June 1st, 2004 | #20 |
Ἀντίοχος Ἐπιφανὴς
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: flyover
Posts: 13,175
|
yep some cuts are "tighter" than others. I had a friend whose brother was born on a base in Deutschland and the doc didnt want to cut him, good man! But they insisted and he only snipped a little. Sadly, when they got the tot home, they cut off more skin.
women who cringe over this, ought to be told it's no more difficult caring for an intact penis on a baby than caring for a vagina. I talked to an Arab once who had been cut as an adult, and he stated there was a very significant difference in sensation. it seems like a bad thing to me on the whole. still, not much point in agonizing over it once it's done. |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|