Vanguard News Network
Pieville
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Broadcasts

Old October 14th, 2012 #101
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default We are an evil racist family

Our youngest. His oldest brother taught him to do this.

We are such an evil racist family.

Last edited by Mr A.Anderson; January 19th, 2013 at 10:05 PM.
 
Old October 14th, 2012 #102
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
Our youngest. His oldest brother taught him to do this.

We are such an evil racist family.
Nah, just good, old-fashioned, Americans:

 
Old October 14th, 2012 #103
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven L. Akins View Post
Nah, just good, old-fashioned, Americans:

I have seen those pictures before, and it raises an interesting thought in my evil racist mind.

What is the historical presidence for saluting the US Flag that way?

Reason I'm asking - I can verily imagine our eldest son saluting the flag like that tomorrow during the pledge of allegiance......and being sent to the office for it....unless he can quote historical reasons for doing so.

**edit**

Quote:
Swearing of the Pledge is accompanied by a salute. An early version of the salute, adopted in 1892, was known as the Bellamy salute. It started with the hand outstretched toward the flag, palm down, and ended with the palm up. Because of the similarity between the Bellamy salute and the Nazi salute, developed later, United States Congress instituted the hand-over-the-heart gesture as the salute to be rendered by civilians during the Pledge of Allegiance and the national anthem in the United States, instead of the Bellamy salute. Removal of the Bellamy salute occurred on December 22, 1942, when Congress amended the Flag Code language first passed into law on June 22, 1942.[18]
 
Old October 14th, 2012 #104
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
I have seen those pictures before, and it raises an interesting thought in my evil racist mind.

What is the historical presidence for saluting the US Flag that way?

Reason I'm asking - I can verily imagine our eldest son saluting the flag like that tomorrow during the pledge of allegiance......and being sent to the office for it....unless he can quote historical reasons for doing so.
Up until WWII, that was how the flag was saluted. Americans quit saluting the flag that way because of the Nazis, just like they quit using the Swastika, which was a highly popular symbol here in America before WWII:











 
Old October 14th, 2012 #105
Roy Wagahuski
professional critter
 
Roy Wagahuski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: under your bed
Posts: 1,618
Default

Roman_salute Roman_salute

"durr notsees made it all up"
__________________
"Don't underestimate the power of 'evil.' ... The fact is, 'evil' makes women horny and men curious. Use those to further the cause."
 
Old October 14th, 2012 #106
Sebastian
Member
 
Sebastian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 330
Default

Mr. A, does your son understand the implications of what he's doing? Does he understand WW2 and the events leading up to it? Does he understand the Weimar Republic, the NSP, all of that? Does he understand race? Does he understand the implications of what he's doing and the consequences he could face if non-whites were to see?

Or is this a cheap parlor trick to get a laugh out of people?

I don't think Hitler's tarnished image needs Honey Boo Boo child to lend it credibility.
 
Old October 14th, 2012 #107
Steven L. Akins
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: The Heart of Dixie
Posts: 13,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian View Post
Mr. A, does your son understand the implications of what he's doing? Does he understand WW2 and the events leading up to it? Does he understand the Weimar Republic, the NSP, all of that? Does he understand race? Does he understand the implications of what he's doing and the consequences he could face if non-whites were to see?

Or is this a cheap parlor trick to get a laugh out of people?

I don't think Hitler's tarnished image needs Honey Boo Boo child to lend it credibility.
 
Old October 14th, 2012 #108
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian View Post
Mr. A, does your son understand the implications of what he's doing? Does he understand WW2 and the events leading up to it? Does he understand the Weimar Republic, the NSP, all of that? Does he understand race? Does he understand the implications of what he's doing and the consequences he could face if non-whites were to see?

Or is this a cheap parlor trick to get a laugh out of people?

I don't think Hitler's tarnished image needs Honey Boo Boo child to lend it credibility.
He's 4 years old, fucktard. How much do 4 year olds really "know"?

You are such a fuckwit. How about this? We have raised our family to have white racial values. The younger ones don't really understand, but they have been properly indoctrinated by us, their parents. The youngens (as it were) don't understand why they hate niggers, spics, chinks, and jews.......and I really don't expect them to. The simple fact they react (viscerally) to the above mentioned is enough for me at this point. Our 11 year old is beginning to understand "Why". Our 16 year old is a full blown White Racialist, with more balls than you.

You see - you "scoff" at the idea of teaching/indoctrinating/brainwashing our extremely young with racial ideals - because they don't "understand it". Who the fuck cares? I'd rather raise young boys and girls who believe race mixing is the most disgusting thing in the world - so they WON'T do it when they are older. And once they get older, and they begin to have the cognitave skills to understand "WHY" - they are taught that.

Educating our young begins at BIRTH.

Call it "cheap parlor tricks" if you want - I don't give a flying fuck in a rolling donut - but it goes to show what your complete lack of understanding is when it comes to raising racially aware children - or it shows your true colors.

Which is it "Sebastian"?
 
Old September 19th, 2013 #109
keifer
Senior Member
 
keifer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,216
Default

Good read, well done.
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #110
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

I look back at this thread, and others, from time to time. I like to see if, where, and in what way any of my beliefs or perceptions have evolved or changed over time. Introspection if you will.

I will start with the hot button topic in this thread - Religion.

I still consider myself a Christian, as I believe the two most important tenets of The New Testament - Jesus is the Son of God, and the only way to Heaven is through Him. In its most basic form, that is what it means to be a Christian. As much controversy as it started in this thread, it almost pales by comparison the controversy it causes with other Christians. It seems although I find no conflict with my religious and racial beliefs - everyone else does. I've been told that I'm misguided, that I don't understand Christian doctrine or the teachings of Jesus, and that I'm twisting and hijacking the religion. Maybe I am or maybe I am just an anomoly. I think maybe SV summed it up the best.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Soldatul Vostru View Post
Your religion may not effect your white racial beliefs, but your white racial beliefs and antisemitism and all the rest of it, makes you a pseudo-Christian, at best.
When it comes to religion in a White State, Alex summed it up pretty well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
The most it can ever expect in a White state is to be just what you said: a matter of impotent personal belief with no social or political significance insofar as serious matters are concerned.
I've said it before, I don't care who or what a person worships, as long as it stays private and isn't foisted on others. I certainly don't believe that any religion or personal belief system should be a matter of public policy or influence social culture in the least.

And I just realized something as I'm typing this. It is impossible, in all reality, to be accepting of religion, and expect it to remain behind closed doors without extremely strict measures ensuring such.

I think of homosexuality. I have said many times that I don't care who gets their jollies off with who (as long as it is between adults) - as long as it stays in the bedroom. And yet, I know this to be near impossible, and have documented and argued that as a fact. It will always try to rear its ugly head into public - as is just human nature to bring to light things that we self identify and consider part of who we are.

Is it possible to allow for private beliefs, while enforcing strict constraints against it becoming a public thing? I'm not sure. The only thing that I am sure of is Christianity - the Church - or any other religion for that matter - should always be kept out of politics and governance.
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #111
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

The next thing I've noticed a personal change in is my view on Breeding. It may not be a change, exactly, but more of a tighter focus.

The White Race is near 9% of the world's overall population, but that isn't the problem. Whites reproduce at a much lower rate than non-whites, but that isn't the problem. Whites miscegenate with non-whites, but that isn't the problem. Whites don't reproduce above the replacement rate, but that isn't the problem either. All of these combined is the problem we face, and is a monster much greater than any of its parts.

Much has been said, by many on this subject.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
Political sovereignty is most important. Creatures breed where they feel comfortable. That's a White state. Anything short of that, we'll be fighting uphill. We must subordinate everything to gaining political independence from the jews.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Linder View Post
It is good if whites breed, but that's not the fundamental problem. The fundamental problem is we don't control our own lands. Our enemies do, and they use it to fill us up with unwanted muds. Of course individual breeding is a good thing we all can do, as it's under our direct control, but that alone cannot solve the problem, which remains a national- or even global-political matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenria View Post
No matter what whites do, we're not going to outbreed groups like Latinos and SE Asians. These are groups who seriously just pop 'em out like bread loaves from a baker's oven. Not only can whites not compete with something like that, we shouldn't!

Today, most whites are little more than niggers in lighter skin. If these people of my town were to breed to the scale of Latinos, for instance, there would be no intellectual difference between their offspring and the offspring of the common Mexican whore.

The problem is not too few of us, but too many of them.
It isn't that Whites need to breed more because of the above, and I'm not even sure if the WN community needs to breed more, although it wouldn't hurt. I would tend to think that WN's are more traditional in this aspect, and desire (or have) larger than average families. We need to replace ourselves at a growing rate, and raise our children (who will outnumber us) with our beliefs. Doing this guarantees an increasing demographic of WN's each and every generation by itself. I wish there was some information on WN birthrates to actually base this on, because the math doesn't lie (much).

But even if WN's have a much higher than average birthrate, that by itself is not enough, because we have to raise our children with our beliefs and values, provide them safety from multiculturalism (physical and psychological) and give them a pool of like minded White people to marry from! Any one of these things is insufficient on its own to counter the monster of multiculturalism and miscegenation.

Having our own physical communities to raise, educate, and socialize our children with each other would be the most beneficial, such as the PLE concept. But even without that large scale physical gathering, it can still be achieved by creating increasingly larger personal relationships with fellow WN's and their families.

We have to control our own space at some point, but until that is physically accomplished, we must do everything in our power to increase our population (which we do have direct control over), raise them right, and provide them with a ready made pool of like minded people to continue the cycle. Even in only a single generation, our numbers would increase to the point that the PLE concept would be easily achievable.
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #112
Ann2
Marie Antoinette
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 703
Default

I think when we get a White nation, our numbers will straighten themselves out.
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #113
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann2 View Post
I think when we get a White nation, our numbers will straighten themselves out.
I'm not even sure if they aren't already. The White Race as a whole may be going to hell in a handbasket and disappearing, but what do we know of our own little slice of the White Race? What is the White Nationalist or Pro-White replacement rate.

Honest question.

Does anyone else besides me think that we probably reproduce above replacement rate? I would tend to think so. It may not be enough, all on its own, but it is a glimmer of a good thing to come.....not for our generation, but for our children's.

The problem lies in geography. Because we are so spread out, and barely know each other (if at all), there is little to no chance at connectivity for our children, and our children's children. This is something that each and every single one of us must take some sort of steps to remedy. We need to give our children a better chance at finding a racially aware mate than we ever had.

Last edited by Mr A.Anderson; October 7th, 2013 at 08:29 PM. Reason: clarification
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #114
Ann2
Marie Antoinette
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr A.Anderson View Post
Honest question.

Does anyone else besides me think that we probably reproduce above replacement rate? I would tend to think so. It may not be enough, all on its own, but it is a glimmer of a good thing to come.....not for our generation, but for our children's.
I honestly don't know. There are so many people that aren't White, it's hard to get even a decent guess. I've read over and over that our numbers are down, but I really wonder if that's accurate.

Quote:
The problem lies in geography. Because we are so spread out, and barely know each other (if at all), there is little to no chance at connectivity for our children, and our children's children. This is something that each and every single one of us must take some sort of steps to remedy. We need to give our children a better chance at finding a racially aware mate than we ever had.
Maybe. At this point though, I'll just be happy if he marries a good White woman. Also, I shudder at the thought of any grandchildren. This may be horrible to say, but I don't want any at this point in my life. The thought of what they'll be born into in this country horrifies me.
 
Old October 7th, 2013 #115
Mr A.Anderson
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 4,481
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ann2 View Post
I honestly don't know. There are so many people that aren't White, it's hard to get even a decent guess. I've read over and over that our numbers are down, but I really wonder if that's accurate.
Just to clarify (and I edited my post to do so) I'm wondering how the WN replacement rate is. That is what I meant by the word 'our'.
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:40 PM.
Page generated in 0.08030 seconds.