Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old May 28th, 2017 #1
NewsFeed
News Bot
 
Post Female Takes on Roosh

His argument is that on the one hand women have been “so programmed to believe in human rights, egalitarianism, multiculturalism,” immigration, and refugee settlements, that they consistently vote in Leftist politicians. And on the other hand, he claims that women have an innate psychology, an “ego” that prevents them from changing their minds i.e. women won’t stop voting in Leftists despite being presented with the evidence, even the harsh realities of Muslim terrorism. So, his solution is to deny woman’s suffrage. His logic: no female vote necessarily means no Leftist leaders.

Although Roosh is right that “nothing will change” other than increased criticism and is right in terms of his view on the destructive agenda of the crooked elites in the Western world, who use mass-immigration, particularly of Muslims, as a tactic to mix and divide European populations so they can increase their control over them, the ‘solution’ he proposes is wrong. Women are not the real problem.

For sure women tend to vote for Leftists, but what is happening behind the vote, the mechanisms in place that make what a person is voting for exist in the first place?

It is mostly males as politicians, as leaders of political parties, which make up that strata, that are behind most, if not close to all, immigration policies for the last several decades in the Western world. It is mostly men that have ushered in multiculturalism, mass-immigration, corporate liberalism and so on for decades, which is leading to the end of the West. It is mostly men behind the neoconservative foreign policies and the funding of open-border movements that are directly related to the migrant crisis and denationalisation. These things are all closely related. It is mostly men at the top tweaking the transformation of the Western world.

Why do men, like Roosh, blame women for the decline of the West? Are we scapegoats? An easy explanation? Our decline is much more complex than just the fault of women. Denying women the vote means denying both Leftist and non-Leftist women the vote. All those non-Leftist women will not have a voice that counts. Why not also deny men the vote, because a significant portion also vote Leftist! Maybe a better solution is to deny the vote for those who are non-European foreign-born and those born to them, who overwhelmingly vote Leftist.

In fact, our elites ignore our voices, our will, whether male or female, to favour the foreigner, so why vote at all. One example: statistics show that the majority (over 60%) of Europeans don’t want any more Muslim immigration, figures that have been climbing for decades, but it continues and continues to increase. Elites could stop it, but they won’t. This has nothing to do with women.

Blaming women is the same thing as women, particularly feminists, blaming men. Same generalisations and lack of sophistication because of the want of an easy answer. In the present climate, with the view that women are to blame, I su

----- snip -----


read full article at source: http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2017/05/f...-on-roosh.html
 
Reply

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.
Page generated in 0.19102 seconds.