|
|
June 15th, 2006 | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In someone's nose hole!
Posts: 375
|
"Ancient Europe pyramid was fake" claims ZOGettes
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...3-pyramid.html
So they dispute evidence that an ancient pyramid found in Bosnia was man-made. Is it because they don't want to accept there was an advanced Aryan culture? You read and decide. |
June 30th, 2006 | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
|
That story stunk of "Bigfoot" from the start.
|
June 30th, 2006 | #3 |
Doubts the official story
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Pineywoods
Posts: 4,974
|
|
July 3rd, 2006 | #4 |
Doubts the official story
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Pineywoods
Posts: 4,974
|
Take another look at the alleged pyramid. It merges into the neighboring range of hills, appears to be similar in height, and is furrowed by similar erosion channels. Geologically it looks like just another hill, albeit one that has four triangular faces.
How many of the known Pyramids or mounds were built among hills? I can think of none. Hill people have no need for pyramids. There is a sense of futility (that the ancients would have felt too) in building a hill among a range of hills - even if it is pyramidal. |
July 3rd, 2006 | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
Topography does change with the passing of time. How do you explain the complexes of tunnels?
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
July 3rd, 2006 | #6 | |
Doubts the official story
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The Pineywoods
Posts: 4,974
|
I certainly wasn't there then to know but I'd bet they were and long before that as well. Are you suggesting the hills grew up around a pre-existing dirt pyramid in recent centuries? That's highly unlikely. They show signs of having eroded for quite some time.
I know nothing of the complexes of tunnels except that their posited existance doesn't imply that the hill is a man-made structure. All I know is what I said; it seems more likely to be a simple hill than an ancient pyramid. Karst topography is common in the region, is the bedrock composed of limestone? Sinkholes and caverns occur in such regions and tunnels are easy to dig. All I'm going by is the photo and logic. Quote:
Take another look at the alleged pyramid. It merges into the neighboring range of hills, appears to be similar in height, and is furrowed by similar erosion channels. Geologically it looks like just another hill, albeit one that has four triangular faces. How many of the known Pyramids or mounds were built among hills? I can think of none. Hill people have no need for pyramids. There is a sense of futility (that the ancients would have felt too) in building a hill among a range of hills - even if it is pyramidal. |
|
June 30th, 2006 | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
April 17th, 2011 | #8 |
Holorep survivor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,849
|
The Bosnian pyramid complex is emerging, aligned to the stars and solstices
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes. http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf |
June 30th, 2006 | #9 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
Behind every debunking of Aryan superiority you will find a Jew.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
April 20th, 2013 | #10 |
Holorep survivor
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The wild frontier
Posts: 4,849
|
__________________
Secede. Control taxbases/municipalities. Use boycotts, divestment, sanctions, strikes. http://www.aeinstein.org/wp-content/...d-Jan-2015.pdf https://canvasopedia.org/wp-content/...Points-web.pdf |
June 12th, 2013 | #11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 86
|
This is a picture of the "stone slabs" found within the pyramid in Bosnia.
Skeptics say it is just a geological formation, not manmade. http://badarchaeology.files.wordpres...id_geology.jpg Although the stone block layers are not perfectly rectangular, the Inca were also known for fitting together misshapen stones. In was more difficult to carve stones in the stone age, so it was easier try to give a general shape and then fit the different shapes together with another stone that would fit against it. The layer between the two layers of stone slabs in the excavation may look like sedimentary rock, but it is actually dirt with a high clay content. Compacted and left to coagulate for thousands of years, it would take on the appearance of a sedimentary layer. Huge manmade earthen mounds and pyramids have also been found in the Mississippi flood plains of the United States. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_mound One thing we do have to be cautious about is that this alleged pyramid does not stand in isolation on a flat plane; it is surrounded by hills. This could be one of the reasons the site had not been noticed before. Combined with the heavy erosion on one side of the pyramid, it seems to blend in with the rugged landscape. In fact, it seems to me that this pyramid is actually connected to the hill range behind it. This does not necessarily mean it is just a natural geologic phenomena, as the builders may have just built the pyramid against the hill in the river valley since there was not enough room. But this pyramid is not Ayers Rock in Australia, if you know what I mean. It could easily just be part of the landscape. |
June 30th, 2006 | #12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,719
|
Quote:
The Jew and self-hating `white` just hates the idea of ancient Aryan civilisation. They prefer to think that the negro who never mastered the art of lighting a fire is responsible for all these technological marvels.
__________________
http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.co.uk/ |
|
July 1st, 2006 | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The re-writing of history according to the jew vigorously opposes all evidence that shows existence of ancient civilizations. Archeological digs are shut down and pursuit of knowledge is written off as "one of those whacked weirdohs". Seeing as how the jews themselves claim to be the originator of all mankind and date the beginnings of such somewhere around 4000 BCE ( I think the jew year is 5766 and not 2006 ), anything proven to be in existence prior to this would start a major unraveling of their weavings of lies and deceit. A rather interesting side note is that the jews themselves state that judaism began with Abraham and his covenant with g_d. They further state that judaism was the first monotheistic religion from which other later-appearing monotheistic religions such as christianity and islam are derived.
I believe they found a pyramid in Bosnia, and the re-writers of true history (the jews) are shutting it down and debunking it to the realms of "nutjobs". Last edited by Shirt; July 1st, 2006 at 02:04 AM. |
July 1st, 2006 | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Burning Down Indian Country
Posts: 6,185
|
Well, wouldn't it be reasonable to find other artifacts around the area to sustain the idea of an ancient Aryan culture?
|
July 1st, 2006 | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Know what I mean? |
|
July 1st, 2006 | #16 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For example, take the ancient city of Catal Huyuk on the plateau of Anatolia, now present day Turkey. The site was basically a mound of earth in the middle of wheat fields. Initial excavations began somewhere around 1961 to 1965. Twelve successive layers were excavated, the top most recent layer being dated at 5600 BCE. The lowest older layer being dated at 6500 BCE. No one knows at this time how many layers of this city are yet to be found. What has been excavated so far shows a city of shrines, temples, trade, artisans, and wealth. The site has basically been turned into a tourist attraction. Further excavations have been basically for show. No new discoveries or attempts to determine just how old this city is. Just the same old same old data from 40 years ago.
Last edited by Shirt; July 1st, 2006 at 03:25 AM. |
July 1st, 2006 | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 997
|
English 'Experts' have a habit of often being wrong.
English history expert Trevor-Roper's first pronouncement of the faked Hitler Diaries as 'genuine' may turn out as misplaced as the Exeter University expert claiming that the pyramid has no archaeological significance. Osmanagic ought to keep digging to uncover more of the 'slabs', blocks, tunnels that he has noted - if the evidence is there, the truth will come out. |
July 1st, 2006 | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 3,483
|
Aren't pyramids usually built on flat plains, where they stand out? What would be the point of putting one in among a bunch of hills, where it looks like all the other hills?
Where's the photos of the stone blocks and passageways?That would be some evidence. Good Motto for Holocaust Revisionists: "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence," said Curtis Runnels, an archaeologist at Boston University in Massachusetts and a Balkan prehistory expert.... It doesn't matter how many eye witnesses report they see a pyramid, "eye witnesses" aren't proof, especially when the eye witnesses expect to get money or positive attention from their stories. |
July 1st, 2006 | #19 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
July 3rd, 2006 | #20 |
Berserker for Wotan
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Midgard
Posts: 830
|
It could be just a hill, or it could be a pyramid that was intentionally (or otherwise) buried for some reason. I look forward to any new findings on the matter.
__________________
"At every door-way, ere one enters, one should spy round, one should pry round for uncertain is the witting that there be no foeman sitting, within, before one on the floor." -Odin, from the Hávamál (Olive Bray's translation) |
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|