|
December 16th, 2010 | #21 | |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
Quote:
A healthy society weeds most of these sick bastards out, or kills them. A healthy society has enough genuine patriots within the ranks of government to block these criminals. They can't be cured. They can only be dealt with. |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #22 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,699
|
Quote:
He entered his first military school in 1897, truly an old-school officer who climbed the ladder of a military career in typically steady Prussian fashion. This is to say, he deserved each and every promotion, political connections or moves being unknown factors in the honourable Prussian Officers Corp. He was highly decorated in WW1 for bravery beyond the call of duty. At that time he was a mere boy. By the time WW2 started he was one of the "old" men in the German Wehrmacht. One of the major figures in the Polish campaign, he is regarded as the "Conqueror of Warsaw". While there he made strenuous efforts to curb the excesses by some SS troops against the Jewish population of Poland. His efforts included writing official Army communiqués to Adolf Hitler's personal attention, protesting the behaviour of some of the SS troops, who were nominally under his command but who refused to follow his orders to cease and desist. This "interference" earned him Hitler's permanent displeasure which explains that despite his military successes, his exemplary leadership, courage and morality he was persona non grata and received neither promotions nor awards, no matter how richly deserved after this incident. General Blaskowitz, in the right command, would have probably become another Rommel, von Manstein or Guderian. Alas, this was denied this brave up-standing man, outstanding general and exceptional tactician. After the military and economic collapse of Germany he was inexplicably arrested on the basis of a Russian claim that he had committed war crimes. This outrageous charge has in the meantime been fully uncovered for what it was, namely a shameful effort to murder or at least smear and incarcerate every German General possible no matter how unfounded the charges might have been. While incarcerated at the prison in Nuernberg, he was mysteriously murdered right under the noses of Allied guard, who "had seen nothing". It isn't enough to defame a man like him, it's not enough to lie about honourable German soldiers and to haunt them into death. No, the "Liberators" have to concoct monstrous lies even after the murdered innocents are in their grave. In the case of General Blaskowitz, it is claimed he was killed by SS-commandos while in prison, because of his opposition to the inhuman actions of some of their comrades 6 years before. The Waffen-SS can be accused without fear of contradiction, since this brave group of men has suffered a degree of character assassination unequalled in history. So it's "safe" to accuse the SS, men who in reality were for the most part the most formidable fighting group ever assembled. Given the vagaries of unrestricted warfare their conduct was usually correct and their bravery has never been doubted by anyone. Anyone who is even slightly familiar with the conditions under which Germans were held at the prison in Nuernberg by their "Liberators" can only stare in disbelieve at such a story. · The Germans were watched 24 hours a day. The lights were never turned off. · They couldn't even do their needs, without one of the "Liberators" watching them. · They were treated in such a shamefully human-rights-abusing manner that words fail to describe it. · There wasn't even a second of privacy for any of these men. This is no exaggeration, but unmitigated fact. And under those conditions, there was an SS-commando going around murdering, of all people, a German officer. Ya, right! My God, how talmudically dishonest you are, you "Historians". General Blaskowitz, innocent victim of Allied brutality, dishonesty, false accusations and false arrest, murder victim of Allied guards, May you rest in peace. http://www.germancross.com/MHeroes/MHeroes.htm
__________________
Isn't it strange that we talk least about the things we think about most? We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction. -Charles A. Lindbergh http://www.fff.org/freedom/0495c.asp |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high rainfall coastal strip of the White Continent nation
Posts: 3,602
|
psychopaths = sociopaths
Quote:
There is believed to be a genetic component to sociopathy, which must be activated in the first 18 months of life by poor treatment by the mother, in order for the child to develop sociopathy. This is based on research with monkeys with 95% genetic similarity to humans. Is this the psychiatric disease that defines the jew, or do they have something else? |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #24 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
As you say, this scumbag being considered as a National hero is an example of the sordid fraud that the Jewish media and subverted education system has inflicted on us. We need to remove the Jews. We would still have plenty of societal problems to deal with - but without the Jews, at least we wouldn't have an organized group (funded by our stolen money obtained through the Jewish Money Monopoly) working fervently toward our destruction. |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #25 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Don't surrender. They're going to kill you anyway. And after you're dead, they're going to defame you. Surrender is not an option. |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #26 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
I'd like to see a movie made about Eisenhower.
A movie that traces his Jewish roots, exposes his Jewish benefactor and highlights his crimes. The "Jewish History" version of Eisenhower is bullshit. |
December 16th, 2010 | #27 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,311
|
Jewishness is not determined by behavior. The jews would love for us to go down this Taylorian road. If Eisenhower was jewish then Paul Gottfried is white.
|
December 16th, 2010 | #28 | |
Pussy Bünd "Commander"
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: land of the Friedman, home of the Braverman
Posts: 13,329
|
Quote:
I submit that NO treatment of jews can be considered excessive. Whatever is to be done with them, they've earned it.
__________________
Worse than a million megaHitlers all smushed together. |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #29 |
Geriatric Coalburner
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,826
|
The Jews must be shaking in their boots at the spread of idea on the internet.
It's one thing for a white to be told their ancestors were duped, and they lost past wars. A reaction of "so what, too late" is common. It's another thing for a white to feel their children are going to Jew-run education systems and being indoctrinated for their own misery, slavery to an ancient enemy, and destruction. If that does not fire off a wave of fighting emotions, then this people - our people - are truly done. The battle of Rome vs. Judea has been concluded, and the slave has solidified it's position as master, since all masters in the slave camp have been eradicated. Whereas the past 2000 years were spent with the previous master in attempt to regain it's position, the next era will be spent with the slaves (whites) fighting amongst themselves and destroying themselves, while the new master and king watches from his 6 mansions and garage full of slave-made autos, in amusement and laughter, before he tells them "fun is over, stop texting the next white woman whose pussy you're trying to use but have no white kids from, stop telling off your family on facebook, stop looking at the next piece of kike ware you think is important to buy, and get to bed, you have to get up at 8am to serve me, I need a 7th mansion". No decent parent - or decent white looking at fellow young defenseless whites - should want to see their descendants suffer at the behest the new Juden Aristocracy - of JEW Values no less!, where the aristocratic icons are not the Napoleons or others who wanted their people to be inspired by beauty and strength and all that moves a people forward, but the icons of prosper being the Lloyd Blankfeins, the ruthless "money before quality of life and people" treacherous usurers, who rather than be painters, or crafters, or builders, or anything contributing to the quality of a peoples life as an icon for the people of "good", have their aristocratic contribution as their usurious doctrines of automated financial swindle - the new "Good", GREED IS GOOD, who as leaders show their people the path to prosper is all that is Jewish: Use, steal, lie, cheat, darken and destroy. All that is destructive comes from these people. |
December 16th, 2010 | #30 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Jared Taylor does not name the Jew and would not write what I wrote about Eisenhower. The Jews want you to follow people like Taylor.... into a cul-de-sac. A dead end. Staying far away from the root of the problem. What do the facts tell you? That Eisenhower wasn't Jewish? That Eisnehower's benefactor wasn't Jewish? That Eisenhower didn't commit war crimes? That Eishenhower didn't do the bidding of the Jewish power structure? I'm not understanding where you're coming from. The OP is a simple examination of a set of facts. A fact pattern exists. What does the fact pattern indicate? Last edited by Pat Healey; December 16th, 2010 at 11:54 AM. |
|
December 16th, 2010 | #31 | |
Holy Order of Cosmonauts
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,136
|
Quote:
There are undoubtedly people on VNNF who have training in psychology and can tell us a hell of a lot more about it than I know. It seems to go deeper than just a criminal insanity with jews. It is hard to quantify, and one can only guess. Personally I think there is something built into the universe, kind of a nihilistic force of dissolution, which is working through the jews. It may be more accurate to say they have chosen to work as agents of destruction, perhaps on a subconscious level, but probably at least some of them know exactly what they are and what they're doing, if not most of them. That is why I think they are actually capable of destroying life on this planet, and will if not stopped. At this level one can only speculate, about reasons why they do what they do. I'm a ditchdigger, not a philosopher. I'll leave the heavy mental stuff to those who are better equipped for it. |
|
December 17th, 2010 | #32 |
National Socialist
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,447
|
Eisenhower was on MacArthur's staff as a Major during the 1930s in Manila. I don't know the exact time line, but I do think he was briefly a full bird Colonel on George Marshall's staff around the time of Pearl Harbor before being promoted (over 30 more senior Officers) and sent to Africa as a Major General (I think). Photos from around D-Day show him clearly wearing 4 stars.
I'm certainly not an Eisenhower fan, but articles that clearly screw up basic historical facts do little to further our objectives. Years ago an excellent book "The Politician" came out regarding Eisenhower's underhandedness. Operation Keelhaul is written about at length. Goes to show that not everyone liked IKE in the 50s. |
December 17th, 2010 | #33 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
|
December 17th, 2010 | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jewnited Snakes of Amnesia
Posts: 13,622
|
|
December 17th, 2010 | #35 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
“Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which accounts for Germany’s startling rise from the depression to a world power in five years. The German government financed its entire operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took the entire Capitalist and Communist world to destroy the German revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Bankers.” Kike Eisenhower does not talk about this is his speech. He is merely referring to the "Military Industrial Complex" just as JFK referred to the same group as the "Ruthless and Monolithic Conspiracy". Neither one of them came out and explained what what going on....exactly. How did Germany do it? By issuing a Domestic Productivity Based Currency. What's that? A currency where each dollar is backed by a dollar's worth of work or product produced...domestically. NOT based on debt to the Jews and Interest payment on the initial debt...to the Jews. That's how they did it. Last edited by Pat Healey; December 17th, 2010 at 10:54 AM. |
|
Share |
Thread | |
Display Modes | |
|