Vanguard News Network
VNN Media
VNN Digital Library
VNN Reader Mail
VNN Broadcasts

Old February 13th, 2016 #61
Orazio
Junior Member
 
Orazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmy Marr View Post
As a result of the recent Roosh brouhaha, I have developed a slightly different perception of Spencer, his organization and its more tolerant view toward homosexuality. The alt-right showed a higher level of resistance to the outpouring of knee-jerk, anti-Roosh hysteria which revealed a feministic and social justice mentality implicit in old school White Nationalism.

In mammals, cuckoldry is only possible through the cooperation of the female. Homosexuals, for all their social liabilities, are resistant to the subversion of White nationalism by implicit feminism.

I think it no accident that harpies and their sex starved WN groupies are at the forefront of the attack against the alt-right.

Show me a White man who's willing to line up behind a "line drawn in the sand" by a flat earth feminist and I'll show you a quintessential cuck.
Very well said Jim. White nationalist White knights are beneath contempt:

Sweden : radical feminists say they would rather be raped by migrants than helped by local stret groups
Feminists in Sweden have launched a new campaign against men that wants to protect women from being raped.

FEMINISM
So, no doubt you have all heard about taHarrush by now, the Islamo-Arabic rape game. You might also have heard about the backlash against the people engaging in this behavior in Stockholm, where 200 men put their viking-genes to use by physically attacking these “refugees”.

What you probably have NOT heard about however, (or find hard to believe) is the feminist outcry (surprise surprise!) against these noble berserkers. Indeed, the rage was so great, they created the hashtag #inteerkvinna (translated as #notyourwoman) where they spewed their hatred over racism, fascism, white men and many other things that can be loosely tied to the events with some cognitive dissonance. In short, they made a collective tantrum on social media over the fact that white European men are standing up to the rape-fugees

Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=d98_1...tDSWBfaXK6S.99
__________________
How odd of God,
To choose the Jews.---William Norman Ewer
 
Old March 29th, 2016 #62
Vance Stubbs
Hatespeaker
 
Vance Stubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,281
Default

"The Dismal Tide", from TRS:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silas Reynolds
I was in a hurry for lunch. A member of my staff was out sick from work and I had just finished a presentation for some clients and missed my usual lunch hour. If I don’t eat sometime between 11:30 to 1:30, I turn into a raging lunatic, and a lot of work still needed to be done, so lunch was going to have to be quick.

Usually when I’m in a bind for time, I’ll swing by Jimbo’s BBQ and World Famous Hotdogs. It’s a family business, and they offer the standard light Southern fare—barbeque, potato salad, coleslaw, chips—but also homemade chilidogs. Jimbo’s is owned by a local guy and he employs his kids, nephews and nieces to work the grill and counter. It closes at 5:00 PM, but is filled throughout the day with older folks from the area.

The older folks drop in, grab a bite to eat, and then sit around and chat for several hours. I’ve noticed this behavior also on weekend mornings, at places like Hardee's or small-town restaurants. It’s a communal behavior. And it’s always all-White. Some of the Blacks do it, but their youth are so feral and dangerous, the older Blacks have to have this communal practice in heavily rural areas or White establishments.

My grandfather used to do it. He’d go to our local diner and “chew the fat” with the old-timers for hours. He’d have breakfast with them, go home, and repeat for lunch. They’d tell jokes, talk local and national politics and share war stories. If a friend was sitting by himself, they’d call him over and have him join the table. I’d remember sitting there and not being able to understand some of the older men, their country accents so thick, it practically required an interpreter. But, I loved the idea of local men and women sharing common cause, no one was a stranger and everyone was welcoming.

Anyway, I drive over to Jimbo’s. I walk briskly to the door, but wait to hold open the door for an elderly and frail woman using a walker. She thanks me and I follow her inside. She waits at the counter, unsure what to order and appears a little confused, maybe the lettering was hard for her to read. I ask her if she’s in line and if I may go in front of her, she smiles and says “Of course, darling, you go ahead.”

A normie SWPL is working the counter. He’s wearing a soft V-neck t-shirt and cheap jeans. He’s got an untrimmed blond beard and his hair is uncombed. I place my order and he repeats it aloud with feminine uptalk. Everything about him is indecisive and jerky. The SWPL is probably in his mid-twenties and the nearest college is thirty miles away. And it’s a Wednesday. This will be his profession, working a chilidog counter and handing out plastic cups.

I sit down at a stretched long counter with single seats, it overlooks the parking lot. Half a century ago likely a “Whites Only” placard would have been displayed. It doesn’t matter though, I’ve only ever seen a handful of Blacks in Jimbo’s and they’ve always been “country Blacks.” Country Blacks for Southerners are similar to the Magic Negro. They’re respectful (for the most part) and share more in common with White rednecks—hunting, fishing and camouflage—than their animal cousins in the cities. Although I’ve seen less of them throughout the years.

I crane my neck and glance at the other folks in Jimbo’s. They’re all White older folks. The men wear ironed khakis or clean blue jeans, button-down shirts, leather shoes and one or two are wearing a VFW (Veterans of Foreign Wars) baseball cap, nothing newer than the Vietnam War. Their wives are with them and they’re all wearing make-up, dresses or nice slacks. The men pull out chairs for their women and go to the soda fountain for their refills. They remind me of my grandparents.

I turnaround and look back out the window. A dilapidated and discolored Hondo Civic pulls in the parking lot. It probably hasn’t been hand washed and waxed in months, or years, and the rear quarter panel has a massive dent in it. A couple lazily get out of the car and amble to Jimbo’s. In an instant, I know they represent everything wrong with White Millennials.

They were likely in their mid-twenties, but I wouldn’t call them adults, so I won’t use the terms “man” or “woman.” They were, for all intents and purposes, children. The girl walks to the door first and opens it for the boy, as I suspected she would. The natural world turned on its head, chivalry be damned—a term completely alien to them and unfortunately, probably their Boomer parents.

She is a natural beauty. Beautiful face, red hair and green eyes. She wore no make-up, sported a nose piercing and had her hair pulled into a ponytail. She wore a tie-dye t-shirt, raggedy jean shorts and boat shoes (Sperry). I spotted a faded Chinese script tattooed on the back of her neck when she walked in.

The boy shuffled in next. He had a grungy dark beard and wore a gray flat brim DC United cap. No one over thirty even knows what DC United is around here. He’s wearing Ray Band sunglasses and baggy sweatpants, even though it’s in the low 70s outside. He’s also wearing dirty dark tennis shoes, with neon green trim—it looks like something small children wear.

He doesn’t take his sunglasses or baseball cap off after he walks in. My grandfather, a Marine, would have slapped me upside my head; a man always takes his cover off when indoors. The boy also has his hands deep in his pockets, another no-no. As a kid, my grandfather would have pulled them out and said, “How are you going to protect yourself if you fall or need your hands?”

I swing around in my stool and pretend to watch the baseball game on a TV in the corner to keep observing them. Naturally, the girl orders and pays for both of their meals, she pays in cash. She also fills both of their drinks and carries their trays to a table. The boy takes his hands out of his pockets and now has them clasped behind his back. When he goes to sit down in his chair, he sits Indian-style in his seat.

I glance at one of the older men, sitting by himself sipping coffee, he cringes at the sight. We look at each other and we know. Is this the future? A weak, undisciplined and unworthy future. I see it daily. Something has to change.

Jimbo’s got quiet when the boy and girl sat down. The twenty-something boy, sitting like a Kindergartener, sucked the life out of the diner. It allowed me to eavesdrop on the couple’s conversation. The girl had vocal fry and the boy, like the counter SWPL, used uptalk. They talked fast, faster than any local, but I got the impression they were from the area. They chatted about meaningless gossip.

I slipped on my light jacket and dumped my tray. On my way out, I held open the door for an elderly couple and they thanked me.

As I was walking to my truck, I started thinking about a line from No Country for Old Men.

“It's the tide. It's the dismal tide. It’s not the one thing.”
[My Response:]

This is a well-written piece, but it also perfectly encapsulates why White racists need to leave the right-wing, reactionary, traditionalist scene behind.

The guy sits cross-legged? He has stupid looking shoes on? His girlfriend opened his door? He had his hands in his pockets?

If that stuff really makes you mad, you should leave White Nationalism. Seriously. You aren't going to help us, you are a liability. The White race is not secretly a Norman Rockwell painting waiting to be restored to life and your quest to replace an all-pervading "degeneracy" with a static society that worships "tradition" will be foiled as long as White people are around.

Marry a Guatemalan or convert to Islam, and leave the future of the White race to people who use abstract reason and aren't afraid of change. If you prefer "country Blacks" and devout Mexican Catholics to White hipsters and nerds, you're fooling yourself as to where your loyalties lie and you'll end up like Bowtie and Guenon in the end anyway.
__________________
"Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like."
 
Old March 29th, 2016 #63
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
Default

Most of the followers of Altright and even TRS are contemptible meme-repeating parrots.

9/10 of these people you will find on twitter with #altright in their bio and using an avatar of a Templar or an preteen anime girl. They all use words like "shitlord", "fashy" (a way to say fascist for queers or little girls), or use nigger ebonics "fam" when referring to each other. TRS is responsible for popularizing most of these terms, and the herd just bleats and repeats. Anyone who calls for principled, serious behavior is "trying to be edgy", will be told to lighten up, or is called autistic. Racialism is just about being entertained to this type.

They don't get it. Calling yourself a "shitlord" is giving legitimacy to the enemies' terms. Mirroring leftists, gooks, and niggers isn't ironic or funny. You're not parodying anymore you're just as degenerate as the people you think you're parodying when you do this. Come up with your own terms. What does using obscure terms leftists on tumblr come up with do for you? How is degrading yourself good for whites? "lol lol lol im a shitlord! hahah!!!"

If you ever try to get in a serious discussion with this type, you will find that they are completely incapable of forming coherent thoughts without inserting 5-10 memes per sentence.

This is also probably due to the fact that most of TRS and the Altright's base are degenerate weebs (closeted pedos), and other assorted juvenile idiots from 4chan and 8chan.

Last edited by varg; March 29th, 2016 at 07:39 PM.
 
Old March 30th, 2016 #64
varg
...
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9,741
Default

Fag Milo comes out as "a gay man of Jewish descent"

Suggests most altright are just trolling with jew hatred. Talks some about Ramz, who tries to distance from jew crit & divert whites to loser AmRen cuckservatism.

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/0...the-alt-right/

Alt-right still kisses their asses.
 
Old March 31st, 2016 #65
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by varg View Post
Most of the followers of Altright and even TRS are contemptible meme-repeating parrots.

9/10 of these people you will find on twitter with #altright in their bio and using an avatar of a Templar or an preteen anime girl. They all use words like "shitlord", "fashy" (a way to say fascist for queers or little girls), or use nigger ebonics "fam" when referring to each other. TRS is responsible for popularizing most of these terms, and the herd just bleats and repeats. Anyone who calls for principled, serious behavior is "trying to be edgy", will be told to lighten up, or is called autistic. Racialism is just about being entertained to this type.

They don't get it. Calling yourself a "shitlord" is giving legitimacy to the enemies' terms. Mirroring leftists, gooks, and niggers isn't ironic or funny. You're not parodying anymore you're just as degenerate as the people you think you're parodying when you do this. Come up with your own terms. What does using obscure terms leftists on tumblr come up with do for you? How is degrading yourself good for whites? "lol lol lol im a shitlord! hahah!!!"

If you ever try to get in a serious discussion with this type, you will find that they are completely incapable of forming coherent thoughts without inserting 5-10 memes per sentence.

This is also probably due to the fact that most of TRS and the Altright's base are degenerate weebs (closeted pedos), and other assorted juvenile idiots from 4chan and 8chan.
I suspect it is mostly a game to these people. The internet has always had different trendy subcultures and lately the alt-right stuff has been gaining traction. I'd wager about 90% of these people are just clowning around feeling edgy while drinking coke behind their keyboard. There are good things about Daily Stormer but I don't find the culture on there conducive to real action - at all.
 
Old April 7th, 2016 #66
Vance Stubbs
Hatespeaker
 
Vance Stubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,281
Default

Cross-posting:

Nazism is not a right-wing ideology, it's a socialist ideology which explicitly rejects the right-wing in both its conservative-bourgeois and reactionary-traditionalist forms.

The NSDAP severely weakened the landowning Junker class, restricted the economic power of the German industrialists, favored working-class officers in the military, refused to return any power to the Kaiser, continually undermined the religious authority of the Catholic church, and claimed that the USSR represented the subversion of socialism by capitalist Jews. The NSDAP also condemned and occasionally banned much of the "far-right" intellectual cannon, from writers like Spengler and Evola, on the grounds that they were reactionary and contrary to Nazi ideals. Most attempts to assassinate Hitler came from right-wing Germans, who maligned him as a populist demagogue.

The actual far-right favors established property over socialist reform, historic borders over ethnic unification, and traditional religion over scientific progress. The "alt-right" is an unstable mixture of American conservatism, Nazism, and European traditionalism, none of which are actually compatible with each other despite sharing some common enemies. The constant arguments over "moderating our message" and "punching to our right" tend to conceal this fact.
__________________
"Surely people differ in their biologically determined qualities. But discovery of a correlation between some of these qualities is of no scientific interest and of no social significance, except to racists, sexists and the like."
 
Old April 23rd, 2016 #67
Harlan M.
Junior Member
 
Harlan M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dixie
Posts: 19
Default Daily Stormer

The Daily Stormer's popularity is being exaggerated.

The site had been using the Disqus site for it's comments, until a few month ago when the Daily Stormer was TOSed by Disqus. http://www.dailystormer.com/jewed-ag...omment-system/

The site now has it's own BBS, which as of this post has a mere 1894 total users. http://bbs.dailystormer.com/users?period=all
 
Old September 4th, 2016 #68
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Jared Taylor defining alt-right:


It's a term by coined by jew Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer, he claims and the latter happily re-tweets the vid. No mentions of Jews by either:

Quote:
Richard B. Spencer @RichardBSpencer

A very good introduction to the #AltRight from @jartaylor and @AmRenaissance.
https://twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/...76968297033728

Last edited by Robbie Key; September 4th, 2016 at 04:08 PM.
 
Old September 4th, 2016 #69
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Latest attack on Anglin from Colin Liddell


Sunday, 4 September 2016

A SURFEIT OF BRACKETS: (((DAILY STORMERISM))) AND (((HOLLYWOOD NAZISM))) VS. THE ALT-RIGHT

by Colin Liddell

I am still not certain about the exact nature of Andrew Anglin and The Daily Stormer, a site that seems to have a rather inflated opinion of itself. But my best guess at the moment is that it is a psy-ops operation, set up by, and serving, Jewish interests. Some of you may also have your doubts about the site, others not, but, as someone who has been in the Alt-Right from the start and has written for all its main outlets – Radix, Occidental Observer, Counter-Currents, TRS, and American Renaissance – and has a knowledge of attempts to stifle nationalism in other countries, you may wish to humour me in my suspicions, and see how I arrived at them. It should at least make for some interesting reading.

Because I believe with a fair degree of certainty that the Stormer is inspired by a certain radical Jewish agenda, I will henceforth refer to it, its associates, and its derivatives with echo brackets ((())), so that certain patterns will be lucidly clear.
Well, let's begin at the beginning...

After Alternative Right was set up in 2010, it started to gain some traction, as did similar sites like Counter-Currents (2010), and later TRS (2012). This new movement, drawing strength from older Paleoconservative 'enclaves' (The Occidental Observer, American Renaissance) and more sophisticated right-wing ideas from Europe, developed a strong traditionalist and identitarian message that was then spread using the "new media" of the internet – blogs, social media, and podcasting. Having America’s first Black President in the White House proved to be an accelerant. Those in power were worried, and the movement started to gain some attention from the mainstream media.

This period of the Alt-Right, which we can term Alt-Right 1.0, more or less ended when Richard Spencer decided to shut down Alternative Right (alternativeright.com), and when Andy Nowicki and myself decided to unshut it down (alternative-right.blogspot.com). This was Xmas, 2013. Spencer's decision opened the way for other sites to emerge, with Greg Johnson's excellent and erudite Counter-Currents and TRS rising to the challenge, helping to create, with ourselves, Alt-Right 2.0.

(((The Daily Stormer))) was launched several months before the end of Alt-Right 1.0, in July 2013. This was essentially a reboot of a earlier site, founded in 2012, which had been called (((Total Fascism))). The timing and political focus of these sites suggests that they were "called into being" by the emergence of Alt-Right 1.0.

Very soon a pattern became obvious. Both (((Total Fascism))) and the (((Stormer))) sought to tie the rising Alt-Right identitarian movement with the (((Hollywood))) version of the worst excesses of German National Socialism (gas chambers, lamp shades, etc.). Some of this was done tongue-in-cheek, some wasn't. This distorted Hollywood version of an actual political movement can best be represented by putting echo brackets around the term Nazism to give us (((Nazism))).

Latching onto each story that has a racial angle – think rapes, murders, terrorism, ethnic corruption, etc. – (((The Stormer))) immediately tries to give it a White Nationalist spin, while also giving it an even stronger (((Nazi))) spin, an obvious attempt to conflate the two. To anyone familiar with the history of European nationalist politics, this is Jewish Leftist Counter Metapolitics 101, and the reason why successful European nationalist parties all take special care to distance themselves from that kind of imagery and rhetoric. While it may be useful to mock Leftist exaggerations of the Holocaust, once this becomes an identity, as it has with the (((Stormer))) and those downwind from it, then you are effectively ghettoized, and who does that serve?

The sinister and willful aspect of this can be determined by observing the techniques employed when resistance is met. When sensible nationalists reject this crass identification with aspects of (((Nazism))), (((Stormerfags))) typically reply with two things: (1) "You're afraid," and (2) "They're going to call you a racist anyway."

The first point is extremely iniquitous and manipulative, because for anyone to be a nationalist in societies dominated by the globalist orthodoxy takes great courage, therefore nationalists are invariably brave men and women keen to dispel any slur on their courage.

The second point is equally underhanded, because it conflates all degrees of racism – from sensible group instincts that all peoples have to genocidal madness. This is the logic of "you may as well be hanged for a sheep as for a lamb," which means, if the penalty for two offences is the same, you might as well commit the more serious one. This has been transformed into: "Rather than being called a racist for tut-tutting at IQ differences and worrying about immigration, why not shout ‘Gas the Kikes Race War Now’ (GTKRWN)!?"

The fact is there are many degrees of racism, and some of them make sense or not, depending on a whole range of factors and situations. This also means that racism can be both moral and immoral.


(((Stormer))) office?
Underlying the (((Stormer))) mentality is the implication that all racism, whatever the degree, is totally evil. That, in essence is the meaning of the (((GTKRWN)))) meme.

In other words, the (((Stormer))) mentality is essentially the same as the Leftist mentality – a belief that all racism is evil and equally evil. The only difference is that the (((Stormer))) celebrates or encourages its dupes to celebrate this supposition of evil.

My view on these matters is simple: If one wants to be a (((GTKRWN)))-style (((stormerfag))), that is your decision, so go for it. I think it is a stupid, self-isolating, and self-defeating position, but I can understand the high degree of alienation and often sexual frustration that push young White males in that direction.

If you want to be a real National Socialist – sans (((GTKRWN))) – that too is fine. National Socialism is a political movement, ideology, and historical phenomenon that has its own existence distinct from Jewish machinations to conflate it with their own hyperbolic version of it. Many supporters of genuine National Socialism believe that the Holocaust never happened, or that the facts were substantially different. They should be free to make that case without pollution from the (((stormerfag))) element. This, however, I feel, will always be a limited taste, and of little political importance.

A more important group, as it is a natural majority, are those wanting to be sensible and moral White nationalists. This group, as well as other denizens of the Alt-Right, should not have to suffer their beliefs being tarnished by (((Nazi))) schtick, courtesy of (((Hollywood))) and the (((Stormer))). This is exactly the kind of trick that Hillary Clinton, amplified by a compliant media, tried to pull on Trump in her Reno speech, and it is exactly identical to the trick that the (((Stormer))) tries to pull on the Alt-Right every single day.

*********

One argument that apparently sincere defenders of the (((stormerfag))) tendency come out with is that they have "meme magic," have shifted the Overton Window, and have "changed everything." This is essentially their mantra and they chant it like sleep-deprived zombies, which observing their Twitter habits, I can well believe. They point to Trump and say, "we did that" or at least "that couldn'’t have happened without us."

What we see in this misplaced sense of their own power is simply a tragic misunderstanding of the phenomenon of parallel effects. This is an incidence where two effects are generated by the same cause (or causes), but then one effect is perceived wrongly as the cause of the other effect. The rise of Trump is definitely not the result of a bunch of (((Neo-Nazi LARPers))) shitposting on Twitter. This and the rise of Trump simply reflect the same cause, namely growing dissatisfaction with modern multiculturalism and the minoritization of White people.

The truth of what I say can be demonstrated by two cases, one where nationalist-leaning politicians have achieved success without relying solely on (((stormerfaggotery))), and one where they have achieved nothing even with the full support of (((stormerfaggotery))):

(1) In Europe we have seen a large range of increasingly right-wing and nationalist politicians being elected as the effects of multiculturalism kick in, and all done without copious amounts of scat-posting on Twitter. Politicians, like Marine Le Pen, have built careers in real life politics – pounding the streets, talking to people, showing their faces, etc., not shitposting like demented dysentery victims on the internet using sock accounts. No matter how big (((stormerfags))) claim their movement is, IRL it is still nothing. My second case demonstrates this.

(2) The last great political campaign in which the "meme magic" of the (((Anglin Troll army))) was unleashed was the state senate run of Robert Randsell, whose slogan "With Jews You Lose" brought him to the attention of RamZPaul, followed by (((Andrew Anglin))), me, and Greg Johnson.

That was a quite a tiff and highly enjoyable, but once the dust had settled, I made a point to notice how well Mr. Ransdell did at the polls with the full support of the (((Anglin troll army))). The result was a grand total of 53 votes for Mr. Ransdell, which he would probably have got without any help from (((Anglin))) anyway. Really, if the claims made by (((stormerfags))) about their power to influence the real world had any validity, you think they could at least have helped Randsell get into triple figures.

I actually hope the (((Anglin troll army))) is getting Trump at least 53 votes, although I suspect with the help of its bracket cousin (((the mainstream media))), it is helping to scare a few gentle souls away from voting for him.

*********

But I hate to be entirely negative about the (((Stormer))). After all, much of this article is supposition and my best guess, and I could be wrong, in which case I apologize. Also, whatever its motives, I believe the (((Stormer))) has had some utility for our movement, although not much. Along with a lot of other people and groups associated with the Alt-Right, including myself, it has engaged in shock tactics that have at least helped to break through the mainstream media’s blanket of silence. This would be the generous way to view (((Stormerism))) and its (((Naziist))) tactics. The culmination of this process was, of course, Hillary’s speech and the term "Alt-Right" going mainstream. However, 4chan, Alt-Litist Milo Yiannoupolis, Gamergate, the Daily Shoah, and Stefan Molyneux deserve the biggest shout-outs here.

However, it would be naive to see this latest breakthrough purely in terms of push factors on our part. The Left always has its own reasons for its actions and this is true in the case of Hillary's elevation of the term "Alt-Right" to the level of national discourse.

Here too there is a pattern. Back in 2013, Alt-Right 1.0 was the subject of similar attention. The pull factor here was the Left's desire to support "The Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013," an immigration reform bill introduced by the notorious "Gang of Eight" group of bipartisan Senators. Their point of attack was Jason Richwine, an important member of the main Conservative think tank opposing the act, as well as his tenuous association with our website.

This time the reason to mention us is the threat posed by Trump to the globalist system. Without that, the blanket of silence would have remained firmly tucked in, possibly with a few wrinkles. In essence, Trump wasn't created by the Alt-Right or the (((Stormer)))'s attempts to discredit us by showering the internet with (((Naziist))) drivel. Instead, the Alt-Right – at least as a mainstream phenomenon – was created by Trump, or more accurately the needs of his enemies to sling mud at him.

This is the reality we are operating in, so we shouldn't allow the Left or its possible tools in the guise of the (((Stormer))) to dictate to us what White Nationalism or the Alt-Right is or should be. Our enemies have been playing that game for decades, but they won't win this time.

http://alternative-right.blogspot.co...tormerism.html
 
Old September 4th, 2016 #70
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Liddell is a middle-aged Brit living in Japan. I think that says most of what you need to know about the guy.



Richard B. Spencer ‏@RichardBSpencer
Visiting Colin Liddell in Tokyo.


https://twitter.com/RichardBSpencer/...84169764233216
 
Old September 8th, 2016 #71
carl_sebastian
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orazio View Post
Sweden : radical feminists say they would rather be raped by migrants than helped by local street groups

Feminists in Sweden have launched a new campaign against men that wants to protect women from being raped.
A swedish female wrote on a forum that these feminists actually wants to be raped, they hate white males becuase they rarily wants to touch them, onviously she is correct, these females actually wants to be raped by the immigrants(they get off at that shit).

In any case the interracial sex must be stopped, even if some females will become unhappy becuase of the loss of sexual attention. It is nice to see somw vining genes in action!
 
Old September 10th, 2016 #72
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Alt-Right Press Conference: Kinda Low-Energy, tbh fam

Zeiger
Daily Stormer
September 10, 2016

Yesterday, a press conference was held in Washington DC by three popular figures in anti-immigration, racialist and “alt-right” circles.

Richard Spencer of NPI, Peter Brimelow of VDARE and Jared Taylor of AMREN fielded journalist’s questions for about an hour and thirty minutes.

My thoughts on the events?

The Good

First, the logo they unveiled for the alt-right was pretty sweet:



It embraces that retro aesthetic which has become emblematic of the new Nazi movement.

Also, it’s great that we have people who can do stuff like this. Most people in the alt-right operate under cover of anonymity, because they would surely be fired from their jobs or expelled from their schools if they became a public supporter of alt-right Nazism.

Having people who can directly address the press on camera is something valuable. These are events that potentially can attract a lot of eyes, and generate a lot of media buzz, and unlike written interviews it can be broadcast live with no manipulation.

The Bad

The key problem here was that no clear, central explanation was given as to what the alt-right is, what are it’s goals and worldview. The discussion was mostly vague and evasive, rather than making an effort to cut straight to the core of the issues.

It felt like for every answer, the speakers were rolling their tongues in their mouths 3 or 4 times to make sure they wouldn’t offend anyone or come off as too “extreme.”

No one leaves a Trump speech thinking “but what did he mean, though?”

In these kinds of events, it’s important to have a clear, coherent message to communicate to the press. Don’t let them try to figure out what you’re about. You have to force-feed them the points they’ll have to write about later.

This should have been worked out beforehand.

The Ugly


And we come to the really bad parts.

I said previously that no clear message was being communicated.

But some messages definitely came through.

Richard Spencer:

“I would say that the Neo-conservatives are actually a model to be emulated.”

“I don’t believe there is one moral standard for the universe or anything like that, I think everything comes from a perspective.”

“I actually understand Black Lives Matter on a fundamental level, that doesn’t mean that I approve of them or endorse them, but I, in a way, understand that deep HURT that they are coming from – they don’t feel like they are part of White America.”

“I would stress the perspectives. For me European culture is the greatest, but also, my dog is the greatest dog. By objective standards he probably falls very short, but he’s my dog.”

“I actually fundamentally understand the impulse towards Zionism.”
“When people say ‘a conspiracy,’ that’s kind of like a racist word, it’s not a real word, like ‘are you a racist?’ It’s ridiculous.”

“To call Jews European would be to insult their being and history and I would never do that.”

“I think it is very important that the Ethnostate be a dream, it is a utopia in a sense, I think it would be ridiculous to start defining it right now, it is something for the future, it is very simple, it is very similar to the idea of Zionism for Jews in the 19th century, its actually very similar to the ideal of Communism for the Left in the 19th century.”

“In terms of the European Homeland, we would have fine relationships with the Jewish Homeland, we would not want to undermine that. We understand the Zionist impulse in a way that others don’t.”

“[Race-mixing] is not really a threat to White Identity, to be honest, simply because of numbers. In terms of intermarriage between Asians and Whites or something, it’s not something significant that we really have to deal with. It’s not like half of the country is East-Asian and the other half is White and we’re all mixing – that is simply not happening on that scale, so it’s simply not an important question. I don’t feel like intermarriage is really threatening White Identity.”

“Whites aren’t going away. If you watch network television you would probably believe that half the country is gay and half is Hispanic. It’s ridiculous, that’s not what the country is.”

Who is advising this guy?

Oh, boy…

What’s the deal here?

First, probably 95% of people in the alt-right would disagree with all of the above, or at least find it pretty gay. So it’s counter-productive to present himself as a “representative” of the alt-right and push these weird ideas.

Second, this is just really bad PR. People hate the neo-conservatives – so why associate ourselves with them? Why say that “there is no crisis, whites aren’t going anywhere?” This doesn’t help motivate people to become active.

Jared Taylor:

“White Supremacist – this is the Atom bomb of insults.”

“[It follows that, by ordinary Caucasoid standards, the average White is a better person than the average Black; of greater proportion of Black than White behavior also falls below the ordinary thresholds of decency and tolerability] – you could make exactly the same statements about Whites as opposed to Asians [=average Asian is a better person than the average White]. They built much more orderly societies than we did.”

“There is a broad spectrum of opinions within the Alt-Right as to the role of Jews in the Western societies, the extent to which Jews are welcome or should be welcome in the Alt-Right, to which they could contribute, to a consciousness of Whites as a [beleaguered?] people – I tend to be among those, who thinks that European Jews are very much a part of our movement. Some people say that no, Jews should not be a part of our movement, but there is an enormous spectrum of opinion on that issue.”

“I don’t think that a Jewish American or a European Jew cannot be a fully committed man of the West who wishes our Race and our Civilization to survive. “

“I don’t think that if a Jewish person identifies with the West and with Europe that that’s something we should deny to someone just because he’s a Jew.”

Again, all if this stuff is defensive in nature. Instead of imposing our value system, these kinds of statements are meant to excuse and justify ourselves based on the enemy’s value system.

This is demoralizing, and actually reduces our legitimacy. I mean, if we accept the Judeo-liberal values, why not just be a liberal?

In Conclusion

It’s great that these sorts of events are being carried out, and Spencer et al must be commended for taking the initiative to do so. In spite of everything, this is probably a net positive, in the sense that we are getting some media attention out of it.

But ultimately, as a movement, we need to project strength and confidence. Having a vague message and being wishy-washy isn’t going to win us any converts amongst the crowd of high-energy young men.

For their next conference, they should make sure to craft a more powerful message – one that’ll appeal to the demographic we need to make the movement stronger.

http://www.dailystormer.com/alt-righ...nergy-tbh-fam/
 
Old September 10th, 2016 #73
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

I don't understand why Spencer keep associating himself with Taylor and Brimelow. He's not one of them, from what I've heard. Not politically anyway.
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #74
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

Spencer is strange. He seemed to be going full-nazi, so to speak, associating himself with the Daily Stormer and doing a podcast with Anglin but now he's started up this site www.altright.com with Daniel Friberg (Swedish cuck), Red Ice and a few others, including Jason Reza Jorjani. This Jorjani guy is an American-Iranian guy whose relatives were part of the pre-Khomeini elite and fled when the Islamic revolution happened (this might be wrong in time, they were part of the elites before that however as I understand it).

Nowadays Jorjani is working to inject the idea within nationalism that Iran is 'Aryan' and that the Islamic 'regime' needs to be overthrown, even lamenting that Obama didn't support the 'Green revolution' in Iran back in 2009. I mean... what the fuck does this have to do with the European cause?

https://altright.com/2017/01/21/rumi-was-white/
https://altright.com/2016/08/18/iran...balist-agenda/
http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/201...ia-great-again
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #75
Robbie Key
Senior Member
 
Robbie Key's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4,399
Blog Entries: 8
Default

[found this interesting article by Brandon Martinez, who I do not endorse otherwise, but this is pretty much how I see it]

Jason Reza Jorjani: Neocon Entryist in the New Right?

Brandon Martinez December 20, 2016 Analysis, Commentary
Brandon Martinez / Non-Aligned Media

I recently came across this fellow, Jason Reza Jorjani.

He describes himself as an Iranian-American of Persian and North European ancestry who is committed to promoting a Zoroastrian renaissance in the Islamic Republic of Iran.


Jorjani is on the left.

He’s now the Editor-in-Chief of Arktos, a New Right publishing company based in Europe.

At the latest National Policy Institute (NPI) conference in Washington, DC, Jorjani gave a short speech outlining his vision for Arktos.


In it he pledges to affirm the Indo-European tradition and focus more academic efforts on emphasizing the contributions of Persia and India to Western thought and development, calling them “Aryan” civilizations closely linked to Europe. All well and good. But he then informs the crowd that he will, alluding to Trump’s proposed Muslim ban, seek to extirpate “apologists of Islam” within the New Right, declaring both Sunni and Shia Islam implacable foes of the West that must be defeated, presumably by military means.

In one article on RightOn.net entitled “Getting it Right on Islam,” Jorjani pleads for a “world war with Islam” and lambasts Western leaders for not being forceful enough with the Islamic world. He writes,

Quote:
as a teacher of comparative religion, I can tell you that the hatred towards our civilization on the part of Muslim masses is not at all “beyond comprehension” and I “figure[d] out what is going on” a long time ago. But as easy as it is to grasp, the truth is not likely to be processed by “our country’s representatives” because in order to face it they would have to grow the backbone for a world war with Islam.
From a European nationalist standpoint, this makes no logical sense. It’s especially puzzling coming from someone purporting to be “New Right” and ostensibly in-the-know about the Jewish role in embroiling the West in Middle Eastern conflicts that serve Israel’s interests, not ours. Has he not read Kevin MacDonald’s work on the neoconservatives and their Zionist war agenda? It’s hard to conceptualize how he rationalizes this view in his brain – that the West has not been aggressive enough in its confrontations with the Muslim world – seeing as the Western powers have been incessantly bombing, occupying and meddling in various Muslim countries for decades, which intensified exponentially after 9/11. Indeed, the plan since 9/11, spearheaded by the Zionist neocons, has been for a coalition of Western “democracies” to overthrow seven Muslim and Arab regimes in 5-10 years, imposing puppet rulers that forfeit their own interests to those of the ruling circles in Israel and the West. Apparently, that’s not good enough for Jorjani, who wants more war and more bombs to be dropped on the heads of innocents. Critiquing Jorjani’s article, a commenter wrote:

Quote:
So, just tell me one thing: Is this American academician actually advocating world war between “Islam” and “our civilization” (Western, liberal Atlanticist modernity)? And he denounces Islam for not being inherently progressive? What kind of ‘True Right’ is this?
Now, Jorjani is right to say that Islam is not a friend or ally of European peoples and our quest for self-determination. That religion and culture should not be embraced as an ally in Europe, but be seen as part of the cultural and ethnic replacement force being used by the Kalergiites to strip the continent of its European heritage. The often despicable behaviour of predominately Muslim Middle Eastern and North African immigrants in Europe should rightly be rebuked and their repatriation should be encouraged. But he’s way off the mark with his rabid neoconservative views on Islam as it exists in its own long-established sphere of influence in the Middle East. While Muslims and Islam pose a cultural and demographic problem in Europe, which surely must be curtailed, Jorjani goes much further than that in expressing a bloodthirsty desire to have a “world war” with Islam generally. He wants more destabilization in the Middle East, which will only lead to more migrants flooding Europe’s shores who will surely employ the argument that the NATO nations of Europe owe them for wrecking their countries.

Jorjani frantically solicits for the overthrow of the Iranian regime, an agenda that coincides perfectly with the most bellicose Zionists in Israel. Presumably he wishes to impose his own version of a pro-Western, and ostensibly Israel-friendly, Zoroastrian regime in its place. He is effectively working towards a goal that corresponds with a long-standing aim of our primary enemies, the Zionists and their cohorts, who wish to tear down both Western and Muslim societies in order to elevate their own state above all others as a global hegemon.

Essentially, Jorjani is a Persian Zoroastrian extremist and entryist working to persuade Europeans, and New Rightists, to involve themselves with his Persian-centric squabbles. He wants to use Whites as cannon fodder and shock troops for a Zionist-Zoroastrian coalition to depose Islamic governance in Iran. Jorjani may have good reason to dislike the Islamic regime in Iran for suppressing his religion, Zoroastrianism, which is more indigenous to Persia than Islam. As he notes, Islam was forcefully imposed on the Persians via the Arab Muslim conquest of that empire in 651 AD. But that’s his business, not the business of European sovereigntists who have their own issues to take care of. His utopian dream of a Zoroastrian renaissance in Iran would require further Western military aggression, and a vast “reeducation” program to exculpate Iranians’ firmly-rooted Islamic beliefs. This would significantly help our Zionist enemy further colonize the region. If he wants to offer himself up as a cat’s paw of Israel in its war against its Muslim regional competitors, then he can go get himself a rifle and head over there. But insofar as he wants the West to do his dirty work, he should be booked a one-way flight to Tel Aviv where he and Netanyahu can plan their invasion of Iran.

Jorjani is clearly more interested in the history and politics of Iran than he is of any nation in the West. As far as I know, he has never identified Jewish power as a problem, or noted their central role in the decline of the West. His silence on that crucial issue, while he manically exhorts Westerners to make war on Iran and join a “world war” on Islam, culminates in a putrid message no different than the vilest warmongering neocons. Is this really someone New Rightists think is a companion in their struggle for liberation from the “hostile elite” that has engineered the demise of Western civilization?

http://nonalignedmedia.com/2016/12/j...the-new-right/
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #76
Sean Gruber
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,465
Default

The Middle East is cancer.

Avoid all bipeds from that area. Avoid all contact with the area. Believe nothing that comes out of the area. Don't touch anything having to do with the area.

It's the homeland and General HQ of our principal enemy: the Semitic race.
__________________
No jews, just right

Less talk, more action

Last edited by Sean Gruber; February 16th, 2017 at 05:49 PM.
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #77
George Witzgall
Senior Member
 
George Witzgall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
He is effectively working towards a goal that corresponds with a long-standing aim of our primary enemies, the Zionists and their cohorts, who wish to tear down both Western and Muslim societies in order to elevate their own state above all others as a global hegemon.
No. Zionists (Jewish nationalists) assert that Jews are a distinct people, unique among all other peoples, and thereby deserving of a homeland/ethno-state. Zionists actually pose a threat to the globalists/humanists, who assert that humans are all pretty much the same on the inside.

Globalists/humanists pose the biggest threat to the Aryan race. So in a sense, not only are Zionists not our enemy, Zionists and Aryans share the same biggest threat, namely globalists/humanists (be they Islamic or Christian in inspiration).

I will say there are some Zionists who believe in nationalism for Jews but not for Aryans. But this arises from a misunderstanding that Aryanism is really Anti-Semitism in disguise, a fiction I have been trying to dispel on the Aryanism thread. Once we make it clear that Aryans are not Anti-Semites, I think we can work together with Zionists to achieve homelands for Aryan peoples and support one another against the globalist threat.

As far as Zoroastrianism goes, my understanding is that it is Aryan (old enough to not have been influenced by Judaism or Semitic culture). So yes, that would be what Iranian-Aryans or true Persians would rally behind in their struggle to preserve their people.

True Persians, however, are few and far between as far as I know (I don't know much about it, but I'm just going by looking at the people and seeing the extent of mixing with non-Aryans; the same can be said of Indo-Aryans btw). So they have a particularly challenging road ahead. That being said, they are an integral part of the Aryan race (e.g. the Avesta and the Vedas in particular are our race's oldest extant works) so their struggle is our struggle.
__________________
Blood & Soul Aryan

Last edited by George Witzgall; February 16th, 2017 at 04:52 PM.
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #78
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Key View Post
This Jorjani guy is an American-Iranian guy whose relatives were part of the pre-Khomeini elite and fled when the Islamic revolution happened (this might be wrong in time, they were part of the elites before that however as I understand it).

Nowadays Jorjani is working to inject the idea within nationalism that Iran is 'Aryan' and that the Islamic 'regime' needs to be overthrown, even lamenting that Obama didn't support the 'Green revolution' in Iran back in 2009. I mean... what the fuck does this have to do with the European cause?

https://altright.com/2017/01/21/rumi-was-white/
https://altright.com/2016/08/18/iran...balist-agenda/
http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/201...ia-great-again
Now this jew introduced pro Zionist rat is meant to be with us?

Why would they give a neocon like Reza Jorjani a platform?
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #79
Serbian
Senior Member
 
Serbian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
Zionists actually pose a threat to the globalists/humanists, who assert that humans are all pretty much the same on the inside.

Globalists/humanists pose the biggest threat to the Aryan race. So in a sense, not only are Zionists not our enemy, Zionists and Aryans share the same biggest threat, namely globalists/humanists (be they Islamic or Christian in inspiration).

Fuck off faggot
__________________
Christianity and Feminism, the two deadliest poisons jews gave to the White Race


''Screw your optics, I'm going in'', American hero Robert Gregory Bowers
 
Old February 16th, 2017 #80
cillian
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 6,377
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Witzgall View Post
No. Zionists (Jewish nationalists) assert that Jews are a distinct people, unique among all other peoples, and thereby deserving of a homeland/ethno-state. Zionists actually pose a threat to the globalists/humanists, who assert that humans are all pretty much the same on the inside.

Globalists/humanists pose the biggest threat to the Aryan race. So in a sense, not only are Zionists not our enemy, Zionists and Aryans share the same biggest threat, namely globalists/humanists (be they Islamic or Christian in inspiration).

I will say there are some Zionists who believe in nationalism for Jews but not for Aryans. But this arises from a misunderstanding that Aryanism is really Anti-Semitism in disguise, a fiction I have been trying to dispel on the Aryanism thread. Once we make it clear that Aryans are not Anti-Semites, I think we can work together with Zionists to achieve homelands for Aryan peoples and support one another against the globalist threat.

As far as Zoroastrianism goes, my understanding is that it is Aryan (old enough to not have been influenced by Judaism or Semitic culture). So yes, that would be what Iranian-Aryans or true Persians would rally behind in their struggle to preserve their people.

True Persians, however, are few and far between as far as I know (I don't know much about it, but I'm just going by looking at the people and seeing the extent of mixing with non-Aryans; the same can be said of Indo-Aryans btw). So they have a particularly challenging road ahead. That being said, they are an integral part of the Aryan race (e.g. the Avesta and the Vedas in particular are our race's oldest extant works) so their struggle is our struggle.
And the sheep said, we just need to tell the wolves that they can eat grass too.
 
Reply

Tags
#1 thread, altright, andrew anglin, richard spencer, vox day

Share


Thread
Display Modes


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 PM.
Page generated in 0.61941 seconds.